233:. Given the sheer number of sources that are cited for it, and how many of them are more recent (2015 or 2016) than the previous AfD in 2011, I have to wonder if this is a serious nomination. But if your bar is plans to synthesise it; did you not read under the "Attempts at synthesis" section "The team at RIKEN has listed the synthesis of element 121 among their future plans after their attempts to synthesise element 120 in 2017–2018 and element 119 in 2019–2020"? At that rate, even 5 years (to 2022) doesn't look completely out of the question, if they plan to start after 119 and 120.
251:
Incidentally, the links to sources above may be a little problematic because most scientists in the field call this "element 121" and not "unbiunium", so that one would only get unreliable sources searching the latter term. It seems fairly clear that a substantial number of reliable sources exist for
320:
calls out new superheavy elements as an example: "Certain scientific extrapolations are considered to be encyclopedic, such as chemical elements documented by IUPAC before isolation in the laboratory, provided that scientists have made significant non-trivial predictions of their properties." I
500:
I think you're confusing notability with existence. For some unforeseen technical reasons, we may never be able to produce
Unbiunium. However we still would have an article on it as the theory behind it and attempts to produce it have been covered by reliable secondary sources.
214:
Elements 119 and 120 will probably have some information revealed on them in the next 5 years, but I doubt that this element will. Having a full article for it will make
Knowledge promote it as something to be excited about for the near future.
410:
1. We wouldn't keep an article because someone said "this might become notable in the future," so we really can't delete an article because someone says "this will probably never become notable" - it's nonsense.
183:
82:
177:
521:
136:
344:
No policy based reason for deletion given. The article has enough sources covering this scientific research. This isn't "promotion" but an article similar to
143:
77:
395:
321:
believe the copious text and sources here count as "significant non-trivial predictions" of the likely properties of element 121.
479:. If you find articles that have existed for 3 years, with absolutely no sign of notability, please nominate them for deletion.
17:
553:
533:
510:
488:
460:
434:
420:
398:
376:
357:
330:
307:
289:
261:
242:
224:
61:
109:
104:
198:
113:
529:
165:
476:
96:
572:
391:
40:
159:
525:
456:
372:
364:
326:
257:
238:
568:
430:
345:
303:
220:
36:
155:
484:
425:
Anything that has never been notable but that
Knowledge has had an article on for at least 3 years??
416:
388:
191:
57:
298:
Knowledge is NOT supposed to promote stories of the distant future as things to be excited about.
549:
280:
I don't quite understand the nomination. What policy based reason are you giving for deletion? --
205:
452:
368:
322:
313:
253:
234:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
567:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
495:
426:
407:
299:
275:
216:
480:
412:
171:
100:
53:
545:
440:
130:
502:
349:
281:
92:
67:
443:
territory? If such articles do exist or have existed, they would be
252:
this, given the fact that the article currently has 31 references.
561:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
312:
Are you sure that's a policy? The closest thing I know of is
126:
122:
118:
190:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
575:). No further edits should be made to this page.
83:Articles for deletion/Unbiunium (2nd nomination)
204:
8:
522:list of Science-related deletion discussions
520:Note: This debate has been included in the
519:
75:
316:, but actually the second point there
7:
74:
544:: the subject is clearly notable.
365:Human mission to Superheavy Island
24:
439:Wouldn't that start to get into
78:Articles for deletion/Unbiunium
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
592:
564:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
554:11:43, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
534:01:31, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
511:16:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
489:15:25, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
461:15:23, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
435:15:20, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
421:15:18, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
399:14:38, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
377:14:33, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
358:14:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
331:14:15, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
308:14:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
290:13:49, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
262:13:27, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
243:13:11, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
225:13:01, 1 May 2017 (UTC)
62:21:25, 2 May 2017 (UTC)
73:AfDs for this article:
346:Human mission to Mars
477:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS
363:You might call it "
536:
526:Shawn in Montreal
379:
583:
566:
507:
499:
362:
354:
286:
279:
209:
208:
194:
146:
134:
116:
48:The result was
34:
591:
590:
586:
585:
584:
582:
581:
580:
579:
573:deletion review
562:
505:
493:
389:Gamebuster19901
352:
284:
273:
151:
142:
107:
91:
88:
71:
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
589:
587:
578:
577:
557:
556:
538:
537:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
491:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
401:
396:Contributions)
382:
381:
380:
338:
337:
336:
335:
334:
333:
293:
292:
267:
266:
265:
264:
246:
245:
212:
211:
148:
87:
86:
85:
80:
72:
70:
65:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
588:
576:
574:
570:
565:
559:
558:
555:
551:
547:
543:
540:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
518:
512:
509:
508:
497:
492:
490:
486:
482:
478:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
462:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
438:
437:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
418:
414:
409:
405:
402:
400:
397:
393:
390:
386:
383:
378:
374:
370:
366:
361:
360:
359:
356:
355:
347:
343:
340:
339:
332:
328:
324:
319:
315:
311:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
296:
295:
294:
291:
288:
287:
277:
272:
269:
268:
263:
259:
255:
250:
249:
248:
247:
244:
240:
236:
232:
229:
228:
227:
226:
222:
218:
207:
203:
200:
197:
193:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
161:
157:
154:
153:Find sources:
149:
145:
141:
138:
132:
128:
124:
120:
115:
111:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
89:
84:
81:
79:
76:
69:
66:
64:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
563:
560:
541:
503:
453:Double sharp
448:
444:
403:
384:
369:Double sharp
350:
341:
323:Double sharp
317:
282:
270:
254:Double sharp
235:Double sharp
230:
213:
201:
195:
187:
180:
174:
168:
162:
152:
139:
54:Josh Milburn
49:
47:
31:
28:
542:Speedy Keep
496:Georgia guy
427:Georgia guy
404:Speedy Keep
387:per above
385:Speedy keep
342:Speedy Keep
300:Georgia guy
276:Georgia guy
231:Strong Keep
217:Georgia guy
178:free images
50:speedy keep
481:Exemplo347
449:precedents
413:Exemplo347
318:explicitly
314:WP:CRYSTAL
569:talk page
408:WP:SKCRIT
93:Unbiunium
68:Unbiunium
37:talk page
571:or in a
546:Porphyro
445:mistakes
367:". ^_-☆
137:View log
39:or in a
475:That's
271:Comment
184:WP refs
172:scholar
110:protect
105:history
447:, not
441:WP:WAX
156:Google
114:delete
392:(Talk
199:JSTOR
160:books
144:Stats
131:views
123:watch
119:links
16:<
550:talk
530:talk
504:Neil
485:talk
457:talk
431:talk
417:talk
406:per
373:talk
351:Neil
327:talk
304:talk
283:Neil
258:talk
239:talk
221:talk
192:FENS
166:news
127:logs
101:talk
97:edit
58:talk
206:TWL
135:– (
552:)
532:)
524:.
501:--
487:)
459:)
451:.
433:)
419:)
375:)
348:--
329:)
306:)
260:)
241:)
223:)
186:)
129:|
125:|
121:|
117:|
112:|
108:|
103:|
99:|
60:)
52:.
548:(
528:(
506:N
498::
494:@
483:(
455:(
429:(
415:(
394:║
371:(
353:N
325:(
302:(
285:N
278::
274:@
256:(
237:(
219:(
210:)
202:·
196:·
188:·
181:·
175:·
169:·
163:·
158:(
150:(
147:)
140:·
133:)
95:(
56:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.