377:) for taking the time to find the original articles and include the reference that I omitted at first. I think if you read the original articles which are now available in the references section that will support the notability of this topic. It is not as high profile as other Congressional committees but it does come up on occasion and there were multiple detailed articles which offered significant coverage it over time (both recent ones and ones from the 1960s and early 1970s).
503:? The sources in the article are very dodgy (a handful of old local news pieces and a one-sentence off-handed mention of it in a CNN article). I tried to find better sources on my own but all I could find were of equally shoddy quality. However, if there are lots of articles talking specifically about this committee in polisci or history texts then I would reconsider my position.
463:. This isn't the suffragettes movement or the 17th amendment, it is barely even notable for the Congresswomen who were involved with it. We would never write an article suggesting that the men's barbershops at the Capitol were important, so emphasizing beauty salons/makeup as a core part of womens history seems inappropriate.
517:
Without the Beauty Shop, Congresswomen might not have equal rights as
Congressmen. It was also the first and only committee women were allowed to chair. Regardless, it passes general notability guidelines. I don't have time to sit here and dig up other sources, but this is what I have and again, it
481:
Women's beauty and fashion is a critical component to women's history. I'm a woman, and I don't need anyone explaining to me what is important to women's history or not. Beauty salons are a core piece of women's history and have been dating back to ancient history. Besides, this subject has been
242:
Non notable minor congressional committee. Other than a passing reference to it in a CNN article there are no detailed sources on it; the two newspaper links appear to have been falsified (the links are broken and no record of them can be found in their respective archives). Even with sources,
211:
137:
132:
141:
124:
518:
shows that it passes GNG. Please note, I have a
Newspapers.com advanced subscription, so some of these might not be accessible to everyone, but I assure you, they are reliable secondary sources that cover the subject significantly.
205:
128:
320:
120:
72:
171:
243:
however, there is no indicia that this body, which existed for only a few years, was ever notable other than the mere fact that it was briefly associated with a few notable congresspersons.
395:
300:
164:
260:
226:
703:
682:
664:
512:
491:
472:
447:
426:
406:
386:
352:
332:
312:
292:
280:
272:
252:
193:
66:
340:
187:
96:
533:
111:
183:
363:
The newspaper links were not falsified. I apologize for not knowing how to properly reference the newspaper archive that I used as a source. Thank you
641:
233:
482:
widely written about in political science and political women's history, especially when one digs into the history of the women who created it.
199:
604:
91:
84:
17:
618:
105:
101:
374:
720:
40:
599:
559:
596:"Letter from Catherine May to the Editor of the Yakima Morning Herald regarding House Beauty Shop Committee, 1967"
568:
579:
592:
by
Frederick L. Berns - he wrote two articles for the Washington Bureau and they were nationally syndicated
678:
716:
36:
417:
Passes general notability guidelines This is a notable part of women's history and
American politics.
623:
595:
699:
508:
499:. Thank you for your response. Are there any sources backing up the claim that this topic has been
468:
403:
382:
348:
328:
308:
288:
268:
248:
219:
694:; this is way more sources than I was able to find and I also have a Newspapers.com account haha
660:
487:
422:
674:
368:
80:
62:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
715:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
459:, but it is sort of patronizing to describe a beauty salon in a Congressional building as an
54:
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
537:
443:
695:
504:
464:
399:
378:
344:
324:
304:
284:
264:
244:
691:
656:
496:
483:
456:
435:
418:
605:"Former Rep. Yvonne Brathwaite Burke (D-CA) on chairing the House Beauty Shop Cmte."
527:
364:
58:
158:
439:
630:
589:
555:
564:
528:"Whereas: Stories from the People’s House - Wash, Rinse, and Equal Treatment"
635:
585:
574:
530:
from the
History, Art & Archives of the United House of Representatives
590:"House Beauty Shop Committee: It's 'unsubstantive' source of good news"
501:
widely written about in political science and political women's history
608:
642:"The Senate Has Its Own Longstanding, Secretive Basement Barbershop"
646:
711:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
571:. His column was syndicated in publications across the country.
543:
A History of the
Committee on House Administration, 1947-2012
321:
list of United States of
America-related deletion discussions
121:
United States House Select
Committee on the House Beauty Shop
73:
United States House Select
Committee on the House Beauty Shop
545:. Four pages devoted to the history of the Beauty Shop.
154:
150:
146:
556:"Lady Legislator's Beauty Shop Is Closed To Outsiders"
218:
586:"House beauty shop committee runs money making venue"
396:
list of
Washington, D.C.-related deletion discussions
301:
list of Beauty pageants-related deletion discussions
232:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
723:). No further edits should be made to this page.
631:"New Cannon Salon Aims to Beautify Capitol Hill"
394:Note: This discussion has been included in the
339:Note: This discussion has been included in the
319:Note: This discussion has been included in the
299:Note: This discussion has been included in the
279:Note: This discussion has been included in the
261:list of Politicians-related deletion discussions
259:Note: This discussion has been included in the
281:list of Politics-related deletion discussions
8:
455:I don't think you meant it this way at all,
341:list of Alabama-related deletion discussions
112:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
619:"Congressional hair salon finds its roots"
393:
338:
318:
298:
278:
258:
402:, is the complaint department really on
500:
460:
575:"The ladies change from red to black"
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
673:Missvain has proven her argument.
97:Introduction to deletion process
626:- yes, the salon still exists!
461:notable part of women's history
650:(talks about the beauty salon)
534:"Reopen Beauty Shop for House"
1:
552:. 24 August 1970. pps. 30-31.
704:14:40, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
683:13:09, 13 January 2020 (UTC)
665:06:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
513:05:15, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
492:04:10, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
473:04:07, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
448:03:57, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
427:03:54, 12 January 2020 (UTC)
407:11:07, 11 January 2020 (UTC)
387:15:27, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
353:04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
333:04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
313:04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
293:04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
273:04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
253:04:40, 10 January 2020 (UTC)
67:01:40, 17 January 2020 (UTC)
600:Washington State University
565:"Capitol's Beauty Business"
87:(AfD)? Read these primers!
740:
598:held in the collection of
560:International News Service
713:Please do not modify it.
580:The Richmond News Leader
32:Please do not modify it.
615:And it still exists...
548:"House Beauty Shop."
85:Articles for deletion
55:(non-admin closure)
409:
355:
335:
315:
295:
275:
102:Guide to deletion
92:How to contribute
57:
731:
538:Associated Press
237:
236:
222:
174:
162:
144:
82:
53:
34:
739:
738:
734:
733:
732:
730:
729:
728:
727:
721:deletion review
179:
170:
135:
119:
116:
79:
76:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
737:
735:
726:
725:
707:
706:
685:
654:
653:
652:
651:
639:
628:
613:
612:
611:
602:
593:
583:
572:
562:
553:
546:
540:
531:
524:
523:
522:
521:
520:
519:
476:
475:
450:
429:
411:
410:
390:
389:
357:
356:
336:
316:
296:
276:
240:
239:
176:
115:
114:
109:
99:
94:
77:
75:
70:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
736:
724:
722:
718:
714:
709:
708:
705:
701:
697:
693:
689:
686:
684:
680:
676:
672:
669:
668:
667:
666:
662:
658:
649:
648:
643:
640:
638:
637:
632:
629:
627:
625:
620:
617:
616:
614:
610:
606:
603:
601:
597:
594:
591:
587:
584:
582:
581:
576:
573:
570:
566:
563:
561:
557:
554:
551:
547:
544:
541:
539:
535:
532:
529:
526:
525:
516:
515:
514:
510:
506:
502:
498:
495:
494:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
478:
477:
474:
470:
466:
462:
458:
454:
451:
449:
445:
441:
438:on this one.
437:
433:
430:
428:
424:
420:
416:
413:
412:
408:
405:
401:
397:
392:
391:
388:
384:
380:
376:
373:
370:
366:
362:
359:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
337:
334:
330:
326:
322:
317:
314:
310:
306:
302:
297:
294:
290:
286:
282:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
250:
246:
235:
231:
228:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
181:Find sources:
177:
173:
169:
166:
160:
156:
152:
148:
143:
139:
134:
130:
126:
122:
118:
117:
113:
110:
107:
103:
100:
98:
95:
93:
90:
89:
88:
86:
81:
74:
71:
69:
68:
64:
60:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
712:
710:
690:- Thank you
687:
675:NotButtigieg
670:
655:
645:
634:
622:
578:
569:Drew Pearson
549:
542:
452:
431:
414:
371:
360:
241:
229:
223:
215:
208:
202:
196:
190:
180:
167:
78:
49:
47:
31:
28:
434:--I'm with
206:free images
400:...William
717:talk page
696:Omanlured
636:Roll Call
577:from the
558:from the
536:from the
505:Michepman
465:Michepman
404:the roof?
379:Omanlured
345:Michepman
325:Michepman
305:Michepman
285:Michepman
265:Michepman
245:Michepman
37:talk page
719:or in a
692:Missvain
657:Missvain
624:The Hill
497:missvain
484:Missvain
457:Missvain
436:Missvain
419:Missvain
375:contribs
165:View log
106:glossary
39:or in a
688:Comment
453:Comment
365:Cryptic
212:WP refs
200:scholar
138:protect
133:history
83:New to
59:Natg 19
609:C-SPAN
440:Drmies
184:Google
142:delete
647:DCist
644:from
633:from
621:from
227:JSTOR
188:books
172:Stats
159:views
151:watch
147:links
16:<
700:talk
679:talk
671:Keep
661:talk
588:and
550:Time
509:talk
488:talk
469:talk
444:talk
432:Keep
423:talk
415:Keep
383:talk
369:talk
361:Keep
349:talk
329:talk
309:talk
289:talk
269:talk
249:talk
220:FENS
194:news
155:logs
129:talk
125:edit
63:talk
50:keep
607:on
567:by
234:TWL
163:– (
702:)
681:)
663:)
511:)
490:)
471:)
446:)
425:)
398:.
385:)
351:)
343:.
331:)
323:.
311:)
303:.
291:)
283:.
271:)
263:.
251:)
214:)
157:|
153:|
149:|
145:|
140:|
136:|
131:|
127:|
65:)
52:.
698:(
677:(
659:(
507:(
486:(
467:(
442:(
421:(
381:(
372:·
367:(
347:(
327:(
307:(
287:(
267:(
247:(
238:)
230:·
224:·
216:·
209:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
186:(
178:(
175:)
168:·
161:)
123:(
108:)
104:(
61:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.