329:. As others have said, this is an important and interesting area of research, and is notable enough to deserve an article. Unfortunately, it is also a very young area of research, and it will be next to impossible to write a good article about it for a few years yet. I say that having a poor article consisting mostly of links is better than no article at all on this topic. (OTOH, I have no intention of working on this article ...)
240:
417:
as one of its affiliates. The fact that the two major professional/academic societies for computing in the US consider "ubiquitous computing" a field worthy of a journal would seem to be a pretty good indication that the field in question is sufficiently notable to have an article in
Knowledge (XXG).
460:
Obvious keep. Over a million refs in Google. "Articles for deletion" and other banners just unhelpful and unsightly clutter. What's to stop vandals from submitting numerous articles for deletion and forcing everyone to view the notices for the long discussion
183:. None of this is original research, and there are many papers on ubiquitous computing as can be seen from the resources link in the article. The article could use some copyeditting (I've tagged it) but that is not a reason for deletion. --
147:. Ubiquitous computing emerged as a new topic in computer science. Challenges are in developing new kind of applications. The article gives a simple and global view of the area and given links are very useful.
374:- the article may be poorly written and referenced, but the field itself is a legitmate area of research, with (as other editors have already pointed out) journals and conferences dedicated to it. --
347:
114:
317:. I agree that this is an important area of research. The article could be more informative about the issues ubicomp raises but the links are useful––
203:
dedicated to it (already linked from the article). There are university centers and research projects studying ubiquitous computing, at for example,
87:
82:
91:
74:
148:
410:
17:
444:
414:
228:
334:
274:
243:, etc. As Whpq says above, the article needs some cleanup and appropriate attribution, but that's not a reason for deletion.
480:
36:
232:
196:
465:
451:
429:
385:
366:
338:
321:
309:
281:
251:
187:
168:
156:
138:
56:
330:
78:
479:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
152:
424:
380:
220:
236:
176:- ubiquitous computing is an area of research that has had a long history including research from the
448:
70:
62:
54:
318:
306:
440:
419:
375:
260:
216:
165:
164:. What is here is not worth having. The subject might however be notable (I'm no expert on it).
294:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
351:
462:
50:
290:
224:
122:
199:
search for "ubiquitous computing" turns up about about 24,500 results. There's a whole
289:. This is a well known, standard, and notable branch of computer science research, not
249:
363:
267:
133:
127:
407:"A catalyst for advancing research and practice in mobile and ubiquitous computing"
302:
259:- Legitimate article. Requires major sourcing, but should remain and be improved.
293:. Just to give some examples that I don't think are atypical, my university has a
108:
402:
200:
177:
245:
184:
48:. A notable topic that's very easily sourced, though this article isn't. —
231:, including (behind paywalls) articles on the general topic from the
181:
195:. This is a verifiable and notable concept and field of study. A
473:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
398:
359:
212:
208:
355:
298:
227:. There are over 1700 hits for "ubiquitous computing" in a
204:
104:
100:
96:
303:
ten faculty members who include it in their interests
39:). No further edits should be made to this page.
483:). No further edits should be made to this page.
125:and more weblinks than you can poke a stick at.
401:has a journal devoted to ubiquitous computing:
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
445:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (science)
439:This discussion has been added as a
24:
415:Personal and Ubiquitous Computing
209:Case Western Reserve University
1:
301:devoted to the subject, and
500:
466:21:10, 13 March 2007 (UTC)
452:00:49, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
443:to the proposed guideline
430:01:27, 11 March 2007 (UTC)
386:19:12, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
367:16:30, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
360:project at Carnegie Mellon
339:12:50, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
322:11:39, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
310:02:01, 10 March 2007 (UTC)
213:Carnegie Mellon University
157:02:08, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
121:Yow! A humungous heap of
57:04:10, 14 March 2007 (UTC)
282:03:01, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
252:23:20, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
188:22:03, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
169:19:27, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
139:19:02, 8 March 2007 (UTC)
476:Please do not modify it.
350:reveals links like this
205:Arizona State University
32:Please do not modify it.
221:University of Toronto
71:Ubiquitous computing
63:Ubiquitous computing
403:Pervasive Computing
356:academic conference
413:lists the journal
229:Google News search
454:
428:
384:
337:
215:. It's taught at
137:
123:original research
491:
478:
438:
422:
378:
333:
279:
278:
272:
271:
265:
264:
131:
112:
94:
34:
499:
498:
494:
493:
492:
490:
489:
488:
487:
481:deletion review
474:
449:trialsanderrors
352:published paper
276:
275:
269:
268:
262:
261:
241:Washington Post
85:
69:
66:
44:The result was
37:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
497:
495:
486:
485:
469:
468:
455:
435:
434:
433:
432:
389:
388:
369:
341:
324:
312:
307:David Eppstein
284:
254:
197:Google Scholar
190:
171:
159:
149:82.238.123.210
119:
118:
65:
60:
42:
41:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
496:
484:
482:
477:
471:
470:
467:
464:
459:
456:
453:
450:
446:
442:
437:
436:
431:
426:
421:
420:Allan McInnes
416:
412:
408:
404:
400:
396:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
382:
377:
376:Allan McInnes
373:
370:
368:
365:
361:
357:
353:
349:
348:google search
345:
344:Absolute keep
342:
340:
336:
332:
328:
325:
323:
320:
316:
313:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
285:
283:
280:
273:
266:
258:
255:
253:
250:
248:
247:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
218:
214:
210:
206:
202:
198:
194:
191:
189:
186:
182:
179:
175:
172:
170:
167:
166:Sam Blacketer
163:
160:
158:
154:
150:
146:
143:
142:
141:
140:
135:
130:
129:
124:
116:
110:
106:
102:
98:
93:
89:
84:
80:
76:
72:
68:
67:
64:
61:
59:
58:
55:
53:
52:
47:
40:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
475:
472:
457:
406:
394:
371:
343:
326:
314:
299:research lab
286:
256:
244:
225:Georgia Tech
201:IEEE journal
192:
173:
161:
144:
126:
120:
49:
45:
43:
31:
28:
405:, which is
346:. A quick
315:Strong keep
287:Strong keep
193:Strong keep
174:Strong Keep
145:Strong keep
463:Anthony717
178:Xerox PARC
51:Rebelguys2
441:test case
395:Addendum:
319:Gilliancs
461:periods?
364:Ideogram
358:, and a
270:Zahakiel
237:Newsweek
115:View log
88:protect
83:history
409:. The
335:(talk)
295:course
223:, and
211:, and
180:, see
162:Delete
92:delete
362:. --
354:, an
291:WP:OR
134:Help!
109:views
101:watch
97:links
16:<
458:Keep
447:. ~
425:talk
399:IEEE
397:the
381:talk
372:Keep
327:Keep
297:and
257:Keep
246:schi
185:Whpq
153:talk
105:logs
79:talk
75:edit
46:keep
411:ACM
331:CWC
305:. —
233:NYT
217:MIT
128:Guy
113:– (
418:--
239:,
235:,
219:,
207:,
155:)
107:|
103:|
99:|
95:|
90:|
86:|
81:|
77:|
427:)
423:(
383:)
379:(
277:►
263:◄
151:(
136:)
132:(
117:)
111:)
73:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.