Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Ugliness (2nd nomination) - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

380:
The way the system works, those are would be different things. Keep means that if people type in Ugliness, they get the article called Ugliness. Redirect means that if they type in Ugliness, they will be redirected to a different article. "Merge" means that the content of Ugliness would be added
273:
and, as Metro points out, ] (of which "ugliness" would be a degree). If someone wants to write an article that explores psychology and literary references to what physical characteristics repulse others, that would be a worthwhile endeavor. But this is crap.
381:
into another article, and when people type in Ugliness, they would find the information in a new place. Delete, of course, means that typing in the word Ugliness would return the phrase "Knowledge (XXG) does not have an article by that name."
87: 81: 149: 234:
An article could be written on ugliness. I recently saw a book on it (I think called "Ugliness") in a bookstore. However, this article is really just a dictionary item.
269:
This article has never been more than an essay that quotes Webster's Dictionary. That's what "Wiktionary" is for. Some competent articles have been written about
160:. There is nothing here but a broad definition, and it's not clear there's anything encyclopedic to say about the concept that isn't already covered elsewhere. 76: 248:
The place to discuss reverting back to the redirect is the discussion that dealt with turning the redirect into an article in the first place:
249: 17: 312: 411: 390: 371: 342: 316: 283: 261: 243: 224: 206: 185: 164: 59: 116: 111: 426: 36: 120: 156:
Per the previous deletion discussion, ugliness as a concept is one that is covered sufficiently as the antonym of
296:. Although not much, this article does have some integrity, so it would be a bit of a waste to just delete it. 103: 425:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a
355: 340: 328: 293: 175: 157: 47: 300: 407: 367: 239: 202: 386: 403: 363: 279: 194: 336: 308: 257: 235: 220: 198: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
382: 275: 181: 304: 161: 107: 253: 216: 53: 137: 99: 65: 359: 332: 270: 419:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
193:- it's previously been deleted, and it's little more than a 211:
It doesn't require deletion to revert the article back to
212: 144: 133: 129: 125: 88:Articles for deletion/Ugliness (second nomination) 39:). No further edits should be made to this page. 429:). No further edits should be made to this page. 82:Articles for deletion/Ugliness (2nd nomination) 8: 250:Talk:Beauty/Archives/2023/November#Ugliness 74: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 72: 24: 197:, not an encyclopedic article. 77:Articles for deletion/Ugliness 1: 412:23:36, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 391:21:22, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 372:17:34, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 343:10:57, 24 January 2009 (UTC) 317:22:17, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 284:17:21, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 262:17:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 244:17:18, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 225:17:19, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 207:16:33, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 186:16:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 165:16:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC) 60:03:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC) 446: 422:Please do not modify it. 182:THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL 32:Please do not modify it. 356:Physical Attractiveness 329:Physical Attractiveness 294:Physical Attractiveness 176:Physical attractiveness 158:Physical attractiveness 48:Physical attractiveness 71:AfDs for this article: 44:The result was 320: 303:comment added by 437: 424: 319: 297: 147: 141: 123: 56: 34: 445: 444: 440: 439: 438: 436: 435: 434: 433: 427:deletion review 420: 402:, in that case. 298: 143: 114: 98: 95: 93: 90: 69: 54: 37:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 443: 441: 432: 431: 415: 414: 396: 395: 394: 393: 375: 374: 345: 287: 286: 264: 246: 229: 228: 227: 188: 154: 153: 94: 92: 91: 86: 84: 79: 73: 70: 68: 63: 42: 41: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 442: 430: 428: 423: 417: 416: 413: 409: 405: 401: 398: 397: 392: 388: 384: 379: 378: 377: 376: 373: 369: 365: 361: 357: 353: 349: 346: 344: 341: 338: 334: 330: 326: 323: 322: 321: 318: 314: 310: 306: 302: 295: 291: 285: 281: 277: 272: 268: 265: 263: 259: 255: 251: 247: 245: 241: 237: 233: 230: 226: 222: 218: 214: 210: 209: 208: 204: 200: 196: 192: 189: 187: 184: 183: 178: 177: 172: 169: 168: 167: 166: 163: 159: 151: 146: 139: 135: 131: 127: 122: 118: 113: 109: 105: 101: 97: 96: 89: 85: 83: 80: 78: 75: 67: 64: 62: 61: 58: 57: 50: 49: 40: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 421: 418: 399: 351: 347: 324: 289: 288: 266: 236:Steve Dufour 231: 199:Chicken Wing 190: 180: 174: 170: 155: 52: 45: 43: 31: 28: 299:—Preceding 404:Warrington 364:Warrington 383:Mandsford 276:Mandsford 195:WP:DICDEF 46:merge to 352:Redirect 325:Redirect 313:contribs 305:S8333631 301:unsigned 150:View log 100:Ugliness 66:Ugliness 254:Uncle G 217:Uncle G 117:protect 112:history 55:MBisanz 360:Beauty 333:Beauty 271:Beauty 267:Delete 232:Delete 191:Delete 162:Powers 145:delete 121:delete 400:Merge 348:Keep' 292:with 290:Merge 171:Merge 148:) – ( 138:views 130:watch 126:links 16:< 408:talk 387:talk 368:talk 350:and 335:. - 309:talk 280:talk 258:talk 240:talk 221:talk 213:this 203:talk 134:logs 108:talk 104:edit 358:or 354:to 337:Mgm 331:or 327:to 173:to 410:) 389:) 370:) 362:. 315:) 311:• 282:) 260:) 252:. 242:) 223:) 215:. 205:) 179:. 136:| 132:| 128:| 124:| 119:| 115:| 110:| 106:| 51:. 406:( 385:( 366:( 339:| 307:( 278:( 256:( 238:( 219:( 201:( 152:) 142:( 140:) 102:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
deletion review
Physical attractiveness
MBisanz
03:00, 28 January 2009 (UTC)
Ugliness
Articles for deletion/Ugliness
Articles for deletion/Ugliness (2nd nomination)
Articles for deletion/Ugliness (second nomination)
Ugliness
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
delete
View log
Physical attractiveness
Powers
16:03, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
Physical attractiveness
THE AMERICAN METROSEXUAL
16:07, 23 January 2009 (UTC)
WP:DICDEF
Chicken Wing
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.