Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Usablenet - Knowledge

Source 📝

200: 255:
as a possible basis for notability. However, the article is nothing but a rewritten press release, based almost entirely on quotes from a Usablenet employee. This sort of churnalism is
161: 279: 325: 302: 194: 399:
The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with
108: 93: 411:. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails 409:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
88: 81: 17: 337: 314: 291: 268: 134: 129: 215: 138: 182: 102: 98: 369: 121: 438: 40: 176: 356: 434: 36: 352: 172: 421: 389: 360: 340: 317: 294: 271: 125: 63: 400: 208: 384: 351:. Sources provided do not meet GNG, with none consisting of significant coverage on the subject. 222: 58: 117: 69: 333: 310: 287: 264: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
433:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
404: 256: 412: 259:
for the purposes of NCORP, and thus the original concerns over notability remain valid. –
232: 407:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include 248: 188: 416: 379: 252: 236: 53: 329: 306: 283: 260: 155: 429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
372:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
240: 244: 151: 147: 143: 207: 378:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 441:). No further edits should be made to this page. 324:Note: This discussion has been included in the 301:Note: This discussion has been included in the 278:Note: This discussion has been included in the 280:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 326:list of New York-related deletion discussions 303:list of Software-related deletion discussions 221: 8: 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 323: 300: 277: 257:not considered to be an independent source 251:removed the PROD, citing the existence of 403:and (this bit is important!) containing 235:. Highly promotional tone. Created by a 231:PRODded with the rationale: "Fails the 401:in-depth information *on the company* 7: 233:notability guideline for companies 24: 94:Introduction to deletion process 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 422:18:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC) 390:13:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC) 361:22:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC) 341:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 318:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 295:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 272:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC) 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 64:03:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC) 458: 431:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 237:single-purpose account 405:"Independent Content" 253:this Macworld article 82:Articles for deletion 392: 343: 320: 297: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 449: 387: 382: 377: 375: 373: 226: 225: 211: 159: 141: 79: 61: 56: 34: 457: 456: 452: 451: 450: 448: 447: 446: 445: 439:deletion review 393: 385: 380: 368: 366: 168: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 59: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 455: 453: 444: 443: 425: 424: 376: 365: 364: 363: 345: 344: 321: 298: 229: 228: 165: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 454: 442: 440: 436: 432: 427: 426: 423: 420: 419: 414: 410: 406: 402: 398: 395: 394: 391: 388: 383: 374: 371: 362: 358: 354: 350: 347: 346: 342: 339: 336: 335: 331: 327: 322: 319: 316: 313: 312: 308: 304: 299: 296: 293: 290: 289: 285: 281: 276: 275: 274: 273: 270: 267: 266: 262: 258: 254: 250: 246: 243:, a PR firm ( 242: 238: 234: 224: 220: 217: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 170:Find sources: 166: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 62: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 430: 428: 417: 408: 396: 367: 353:BilledMammal 348: 332: 309: 286: 263: 230: 218: 212: 204: 197: 191: 185: 179: 169: 75: 49: 47: 31: 28: 241:LaunchSquad 195:free images 435:talk page 249:NemesisAT 118:Usablenet 70:Usablenet 37:talk page 437:or in a 418:HighKing 413:WP:NCORP 370:Relisted 245:see diff 162:View log 103:glossary 39:or in a 201:WP refs 189:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 397:Delete 386:plicit 349:Delete 173:Google 139:delete 60:plicit 50:delete 239:from 216:JSTOR 177:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 357:talk 330:Tera 328:. – 307:Tera 305:. – 284:Tera 282:. – 261:Tera 209:FENS 183:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 334:tix 311:tix 288:tix 265:tix 247:". 223:TWL 160:– ( 415:. 359:) 203:) 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 52:. 381:✗ 355:( 338:₵ 315:₵ 292:₵ 269:₵ 227:) 219:· 213:· 205:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 180:· 175:( 167:( 164:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 55:✗

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review

plicit
03:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
Usablenet

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Usablenet
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.