200:
255:
as a possible basis for notability. However, the article is nothing but a rewritten press release, based almost entirely on quotes from a
Usablenet employee. This sort of churnalism is
161:
279:
325:
302:
194:
399:
The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of deep or significant coverage with
108:
93:
411:. None of the references in the article meet the criteria and having searched I am unable to locate any references that meet the criteria. Topic fails
409:
original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject
88:
81:
17:
337:
314:
291:
268:
134:
129:
215:
138:
182:
102:
98:
369:
121:
438:
40:
176:
356:
434:
36:
352:
172:
421:
389:
360:
340:
317:
294:
271:
125:
63:
400:
208:
384:
351:. Sources provided do not meet GNG, with none consisting of significant coverage on the subject.
222:
58:
117:
69:
333:
310:
287:
264:
77:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
433:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
404:
256:
412:
259:
for the purposes of NCORP, and thus the original concerns over notability remain valid. –
232:
407:. "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include
248:
188:
416:
379:
252:
236:
53:
329:
306:
283:
260:
155:
429:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
372:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
240:
244:
151:
147:
143:
207:
378:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
441:). No further edits should be made to this page.
324:Note: This discussion has been included in the
301:Note: This discussion has been included in the
278:Note: This discussion has been included in the
280:list of Companies-related deletion discussions
326:list of New York-related deletion discussions
303:list of Software-related deletion discussions
221:
8:
109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
323:
300:
277:
257:not considered to be an independent source
251:removed the PROD, citing the existence of
403:and (this bit is important!) containing
235:. Highly promotional tone. Created by a
231:PRODded with the rationale: "Fails the
401:in-depth information *on the company*
7:
233:notability guideline for companies
24:
94:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
1:
422:18:14, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
390:13:49, 24 August 2021 (UTC)
361:22:42, 20 August 2021 (UTC)
341:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
318:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
295:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
272:12:07, 17 August 2021 (UTC)
84:(AfD)? Read these primers!
64:03:41, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
458:
431:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
237:single-purpose account
405:"Independent Content"
253:this Macworld article
82:Articles for deletion
392:
343:
320:
297:
99:Guide to deletion
89:How to contribute
449:
387:
382:
377:
375:
373:
226:
225:
211:
159:
141:
79:
61:
56:
34:
457:
456:
452:
451:
450:
448:
447:
446:
445:
439:deletion review
393:
385:
380:
368:
366:
168:
132:
116:
113:
76:
73:
59:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
455:
453:
444:
443:
425:
424:
376:
365:
364:
363:
345:
344:
321:
298:
229:
228:
165:
112:
111:
106:
96:
91:
74:
72:
67:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
454:
442:
440:
436:
432:
427:
426:
423:
420:
419:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
395:
394:
391:
388:
383:
374:
371:
362:
358:
354:
350:
347:
346:
342:
339:
336:
335:
331:
327:
322:
319:
316:
313:
312:
308:
304:
299:
296:
293:
290:
289:
285:
281:
276:
275:
274:
273:
270:
267:
266:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
243:, a PR firm (
242:
238:
234:
224:
220:
217:
214:
210:
206:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
174:
171:
170:Find sources:
166:
163:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
110:
107:
104:
100:
97:
95:
92:
90:
87:
86:
85:
83:
78:
71:
68:
66:
65:
62:
57:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
430:
428:
417:
408:
396:
367:
353:BilledMammal
348:
332:
309:
286:
263:
230:
218:
212:
204:
197:
191:
185:
179:
169:
75:
49:
47:
31:
28:
241:LaunchSquad
195:free images
435:talk page
249:NemesisAT
118:Usablenet
70:Usablenet
37:talk page
437:or in a
418:HighKing
413:WP:NCORP
370:Relisted
245:see diff
162:View log
103:glossary
39:or in a
201:WP refs
189:scholar
135:protect
130:history
80:New to
397:Delete
386:plicit
349:Delete
173:Google
139:delete
60:plicit
50:delete
239:from
216:JSTOR
177:books
156:views
148:watch
144:links
16:<
357:talk
330:Tera
328:. –
307:Tera
305:. –
284:Tera
282:. –
261:Tera
209:FENS
183:news
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
334:tix
311:tix
288:tix
265:tix
247:".
223:TWL
160:– (
415:.
359:)
203:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
52:.
381:✗
355:(
338:₵
315:₵
292:₵
269:₵
227:)
219:·
213:·
205:·
198:·
192:·
186:·
180:·
175:(
167:(
164:)
158:)
120:(
105:)
101:(
55:✗
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.