325:, looked promising at first, as it seemed to have a whole essay on the subject, but then actually reading the essay itself revealed that its about vampires in fiction in general, barely mentions Stephen King's work, and when it does, only talks about Salem's Lot. So, in the end, there was only the one, good source, that talks about Stephen King's use of vampires as a whole, which is not enough. All the other sources are discussions about individual books or stories on their own, so combining them to support this article would just be
322:
318:
284:, with some of it actually not even being correct. I have not yet looked to see if there are any actual legitimate, secondary sources that discuss vampires in King's works as a whole (as opposed to just on individual vampires like
205:
309:- After actually looking for sources, I haven't found enough on the topic that would support an article. There are plenty of sources on individual works of King's that feature vampires (largely
253:
317:), but I have only found one actually decent source that discusses the concept of vampires in his work as a whole, that also features in-depth analysis that goes beyond plot summary, which is
288:) in more than just terms of plot summary that would give the topic notability, but even if there are, the vast bulk of the current article needs to be removed and completely re-written.
199:
158:
90:
105:
165:
131:
126:
135:
118:
276:- Not only is this nothing but completely in-universe summaries sourced only to the works of fiction themselves, but a whole lot of this is
220:
187:
85:
78:
17:
181:
99:
95:
281:
425:
177:
40:
408:
387:
370:
338:
297:
265:
245:
60:
227:
122:
114:
66:
421:
193:
36:
334:
293:
213:
350:
326:
277:
404:
364:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
420:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
383:
314:
396:
354:
330:
321:
While it, alone, is a great source, its the only one I was able to find. Others, like
289:
261:
241:
400:
360:
310:
54:
152:
379:
285:
257:
237:
416:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
254:
list of
Fictional elements-related deletion discussions
148:
144:
140:
212:
378:: a SYNTHy topic based purely on original research.
226:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
428:). No further edits should be made to this page.
252:Note: This discussion has been included in the
8:
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
251:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
91:Introduction to deletion process
1:
409:21:51, 30 October 2019 (UTC)
388:20:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
371:19:29, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
339:19:50, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
298:19:12, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
266:18:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
246:18:13, 23 October 2019 (UTC)
61:02:42, 31 October 2019 (UTC)
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
445:
418:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
115:Vampire (Stephen King)
67:Vampire (Stephen King)
79:Articles for deletion
282:WP:ORIGINALRESEARCH
236:Non-notable topic
368:
268:
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
436:
359:
315:American Vampire
231:
230:
216:
168:
156:
138:
76:
57:
34:
444:
443:
439:
438:
437:
435:
434:
433:
432:
426:deletion review
369:
173:
164:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
55:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
442:
440:
431:
430:
412:
411:
390:
373:
358:
344:
343:
342:
341:
301:
300:
270:
269:
234:
233:
170:
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
441:
429:
427:
423:
419:
414:
413:
410:
406:
402:
398:
394:
391:
389:
385:
381:
377:
374:
372:
366:
362:
356:
352:
349:
346:
345:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
305:
304:
303:
302:
299:
295:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
272:
271:
267:
263:
259:
255:
250:
249:
248:
247:
243:
239:
229:
225:
222:
219:
215:
211:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
183:
179:
176:
175:Find sources:
171:
167:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
58:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
417:
415:
392:
375:
347:
306:
273:
235:
223:
217:
209:
202:
196:
190:
184:
174:
161:
72:
53:
49:
47:
31:
28:
311:Salem's Lot
307:Weak Delete
286:Kurt Barlow
200:free images
422:talk page
357:fancruft.
331:Rorshacma
290:Rorshacma
37:talk page
424:or in a
351:WP:SYNTH
327:WP:SYNTH
323:this one
278:WP:SYNTH
159:View log
100:glossary
39:or in a
401:4meter4
361:ZXCVBNM
274:Comment
206:WP refs
194:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
56:MBisanz
393:Delete
380:Drmies
376:Delete
348:Delete
178:Google
136:delete
50:delete
397:WP:OR
355:WP:OR
319:here.
221:JSTOR
182:books
166:Stats
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
405:talk
384:talk
365:TALK
335:talk
313:and
294:talk
280:and
262:talk
242:talk
214:FENS
188:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
395:as
329:.
258:TTN
238:TTN
228:TWL
157:– (
407:)
386:)
353:,
337:)
296:)
264:)
256:.
244:)
208:)
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
52:.
403:(
399:.
382:(
367:)
363:(
333:(
292:(
260:(
240:(
232:)
224:·
218:·
210:·
203:·
197:·
191:·
185:·
180:(
172:(
169:)
162:·
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.