407:
Yes, it is true you need multiple sources. I'm suspicious of some of the reports put forward by some research agencies where it is difficult to identify the author or where they just don't look right. Also, I found reports mentioned on "Market
Research Future" but this website is registered on
416:
is probably OK. Once you go searching though, there appears to be sufficient reports and all in all - unless someone can point to a reason to discount these references - I think there's enough here to say that there exists sufficient sources that meet the criteria for establishing notability.
315:
I looked at all of the references there' The last one ("Magic
Quadrant for Intrusion Detection and Prevention Systems") is arguably suitable, including about 3 paragraphs of content on the company. The rest are all useless, and more than one good source is needed to write an article anyway.
208:
276:
268:
264:
165:
272:
202:
97:
112:
301:. Most of the material removed was promotional in some form. I don't see any references that would support a keep vote, but I haven't checked them all.
409:
413:
260:
92:
85:
17:
298:
410:
this "GLOBAL AND UNITED STATES INTRUSION DETECTION AND PREVENTION SOFTWARE MARKET SIZE, STATUS AND FORECAST 2021-2027" report
106:
102:
54:
138:
133:
436:
338:
223:
142:
472:
40:
190:
169:
125:
184:
468:
36:
180:
370:
Analyst reports such as Garner, Forrester, etc, meet GNG/NCORP criteria for establishing notability.
306:
453:
423:
394:
382:
376:
358:
325:
310:
288:
252:
67:
216:
230:
240:
447:
81:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
467:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
414:
this "Intrusion
Detection and Prevention Systems Software Market Analysis 2022" by Stratagem
389:
320:
247:
62:
302:
196:
129:
418:
371:
159:
386:
317:
244:
59:
121:
73:
349:
381:
Yes, but there's only one of them (which I will admit I missed in the
463:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
385:) and don't you need two such sources to establish notability?
439:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
412:
by
Kingpin Market Research is ... difficult ... to validate,
341:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
155:
151:
147:
215:
445:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
347:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
229:
297:the article used to be much longer, note revision
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
475:). No further edits should be made to this page.
259:Note: This discussion has been included in the
243:. Knowledge (XXG) is not a business directory.
8:
113:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
258:
408:Knowledge (XXG)'s Blacklist. So while
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
24:
263:lists for the following topics:
98:Introduction to deletion process
1:
88:(AfD)? Read these primers!
492:
395:21:45, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
377:18:33, 31 March 2023 (UTC)
359:07:07, 25 March 2023 (UTC)
326:22:35, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
311:04:57, 24 March 2023 (UTC)
289:03:04, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
253:02:27, 18 March 2023 (UTC)
454:10:14, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
424:11:12, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
68:18:06, 1 April 2023 (UTC)
465:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
239:Lack of notability per
170:edits since nomination
283:"Ghost of Dan Gurney"
86:Articles for deletion
456:
452:
361:
291:
286:
103:Guide to deletion
93:How to contribute
58:
55:non-admin closure
483:
446:
444:
442:
440:
357:
346:
344:
342:
287:
285:
261:deletion sorting
234:
233:
219:
163:
145:
83:
52:
34:
491:
490:
486:
485:
484:
482:
481:
480:
479:
473:deletion review
435:
433:
392:
391:it has begun...
348:
337:
335:
323:
322:it has begun...
280:
250:
249:it has begun...
176:
136:
120:
117:
80:
77:
65:
64:it has begun...
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
489:
487:
478:
477:
459:
458:
443:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
400:
399:
398:
397:
390:
364:
363:
345:
331:
330:
329:
328:
321:
292:
248:
237:
236:
173:
116:
115:
110:
100:
95:
78:
76:
71:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
488:
476:
474:
470:
466:
461:
460:
457:
455:
451:
450:
441:
438:
431:
425:
422:
421:
415:
411:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
396:
393:
388:
384:
383:WP:REFBOMBing
380:
379:
378:
375:
374:
369:
366:
365:
362:
360:
356:
354:
353:
343:
340:
333:
332:
327:
324:
319:
314:
313:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
284:
278:
274:
270:
266:
262:
257:
256:
255:
254:
251:
246:
242:
232:
228:
225:
222:
218:
214:
210:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
186:
182:
179:
178:Find sources:
174:
171:
167:
161:
157:
153:
149:
144:
140:
135:
131:
127:
123:
119:
118:
114:
111:
108:
104:
101:
99:
96:
94:
91:
90:
89:
87:
82:
75:
72:
70:
69:
66:
61:
56:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
464:
462:
449:CycloneYoris
448:
434:
432:
419:
372:
367:
351:
350:
336:
334:
294:
282:
238:
226:
220:
212:
205:
199:
193:
187:
177:
79:
49:
47:
31:
28:
203:free images
387:* Pppery *
318:* Pppery *
303:Walt Yoder
299:1139512372
277:California
245:* Pppery *
60:* Pppery *
469:talk page
269:Computing
265:Companies
122:Vectra AI
74:Vectra AI
50:Withdrawn
37:talk page
471:or in a
437:Relisted
420:HighKing
373:HighKing
339:Relisted
273:Internet
241:WP:NCORP
166:View log
107:glossary
39:or in a
295:Comment
275:, and
209:WP refs
197:scholar
139:protect
134:history
84:New to
181:Google
143:delete
224:JSTOR
185:books
160:views
152:watch
148:links
16:<
368:Keep
307:talk
217:FENS
191:news
156:logs
130:talk
126:edit
231:TWL
164:– (
355:iz
309:)
281:-
279:.
271:,
267:,
211:)
168:|
158:|
154:|
150:|
146:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
352:L
305:(
235:)
227:·
221:·
213:·
206:·
200:·
194:·
188:·
183:(
175:(
172:)
162:)
124:(
109:)
105:(
57:)
53:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.