Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Vivian Miranda - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

372:. Postdocs are usually not yet notable (that's still true for assistant professors, the next step up the ladder), and an award to support a postdoc is also not enough for notability. It's difficult to find the astronomical Vivian Miranda publications among all the non-astronomy publications by other Vivians Miranda, and among all the other astronomy publications by Vinicius and Valmin and other Vs Miranda, but it's clear from the difficulty of finding them that they're not cited highly enough to make a surprise case for 531:
Of course. But the argument for notability will have to be that she is covered in nontrivial detail in independent reliable sources, not that she won the Woods Lectureship nor that she is the only Brazilian on a multi-billion-dollar academic project. Incidentally, is "trans" as a noun rather than an
502:
My understanding of NACADEMIC is, based on it saying "It is possible for an academic not to be notable under the provisions of this guideline but to be notable in some other way under the general notability guideline or one of the other subject-specific notability guidelines" is that an academic who
585:
people who are still at the post-doc stage are almost never notable. Nothing here suggests otherwise for this individual. I have had enough articles on Ph.D. holding professors with several years of teaching and multiple publications deleted to know that Miranda is no where near making the
436:
every semester is not so arduous). Also, I think the press release from Brookhaven counts as adequately "independent": it's by the organization who chose to give her an award, not by Miranda herself, and not by her employer or by any of the schools where she studied. The same goes for the
234:
The article's sources are not independent - the subject's employer, and a press release from the institution that gave her an award. I can't find any independent sources giving her significant coverage, and so can't see how she passes
203: 432:, but the content isn't so objectionable that it has to be expunged. It can live on as a userspace draft indefinitely, or in Draft space proper for months (coming back to edit an academic biography to reset the 265: 567: 458: 156: 290: 377: 340: 197: 315: 397: 88: 103: 438: 163: 466:
I have been working on this article today and am continuing to do so. I believe it more robustly demonstrates GNG notability at this time.
129: 124: 83: 76: 17: 133: 116: 218: 97: 93: 185: 630: 484:, not GNG. She clearly fails to meet any of them. So any notability will have to rely on non-academic material, not on 40: 508: 471: 591: 179: 537: 493: 384: 485: 445:
article about the award named in her honor, mention Miranda as the first recipient, and (for the time being)
420:
It looks like this was promoted from sandbox-draft status the same day it was created. I don't think there's
612: 595: 541: 526: 512: 497: 475: 409: 388: 357: 332: 307: 282: 257: 175: 58: 352: 327: 302: 277: 252: 120: 626: 563: 522: 504: 467: 454: 36: 239:; she is an early career scholar, having completed her PhD in 2015, and I'm not seeing how she passes 225: 608: 587: 421: 369: 112: 64: 533: 489: 380: 211: 405: 240: 344: 319: 294: 269: 244: 72: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
625:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
481: 425: 373: 35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
559: 532:
adjective considered acceptable language, or is it a bad translation of the source titles? —
518: 450: 191: 433: 429: 236: 604: 441:
by the Sociedade Brasileira de Física. Alternatively, we could add a little bit to the
401: 150: 442: 547: 480:
We have standards for what it takes to be notable as an academic. They are in
54: 488:
the details of academic projects in which she is a minor participant. —
517:
Concur. An academic that fails NACADEMIC but passes GNG is notable. --
558:
and says that the latter should be used as an adjective, not a noun.
621:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
376:. There is a little popular-press media for being transgender 503:
does not meet NACADMIC but still meets GNG is still notable.
266:
list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions
146: 142: 138: 210: 224: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 633:). No further edits should be made to this page. 396:Note: This discussion has been included in the 339:Note: This discussion has been included in the 314:Note: This discussion has been included in the 289:Note: This discussion has been included in the 264:Note: This discussion has been included in the 243:either. Regretfully, I think this is a delete. 291:list of Astronomy-related deletion discussions 341:list of Illinois-related deletion discussions 8: 104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 316:list of Brazil-related deletion discussions 398:list of Women-related deletion discussions 395: 338: 313: 288: 263: 603:. Not enough there yet for notability. 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 546:I think it's a bad translation. The 379:but I don't think that's enough. — 24: 89:Introduction to deletion process 1: 613:10:20, 15 October 2019 (UTC) 596:21:21, 14 October 2019 (UTC) 568:17:58, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 542:01:09, 10 October 2019 (UTC) 59:08:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC) 527:18:02, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 513:17:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 498:17:24, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 476:17:18, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 459:16:41, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 410:11:23, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 389:06:22, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 358:06:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 333:06:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 308:06:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 283:06:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 258:06:10, 9 October 2019 (UTC) 79:(AfD)? Read these primers! 650: 623:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 550:, for example, treats 418:Return to Draft world 77:Articles for deletion 554:as a short form of 424:a case for passing 588:John Pack Lambert 548:GLAAD style guide 449:this page there. 412: 360: 335: 310: 285: 94:Guide to deletion 84:How to contribute 641: 505:Elysia (Wiki Ed) 468:Elysia (Wiki Ed) 350: 347: 325: 322: 300: 297: 275: 272: 250: 247: 229: 228: 214: 166: 154: 136: 74: 34: 649: 648: 644: 643: 642: 640: 639: 638: 637: 631:deletion review 355: 348: 345: 330: 323: 320: 305: 298: 295: 280: 273: 270: 255: 248: 245: 171: 162: 127: 111: 108: 71: 68: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 647: 645: 636: 635: 617: 616: 598: 580: 579: 578: 577: 576: 575: 574: 573: 572: 571: 570: 534:David Eppstein 490:David Eppstein 461: 414: 413: 392: 391: 381:David Eppstein 362: 361: 353: 336: 328: 311: 303: 286: 278: 253: 232: 231: 168: 113:Vivian Miranda 107: 106: 101: 91: 86: 69: 67: 65:Vivian Miranda 62: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 646: 634: 632: 628: 624: 619: 618: 614: 610: 606: 602: 599: 597: 593: 589: 584: 581: 569: 565: 561: 557: 553: 549: 545: 544: 543: 539: 535: 530: 529: 528: 524: 520: 516: 515: 514: 510: 506: 501: 500: 499: 495: 491: 487: 483: 479: 478: 477: 473: 469: 465: 462: 460: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 435: 431: 427: 423: 419: 416: 415: 411: 407: 403: 399: 394: 393: 390: 386: 382: 378: 375: 371: 367: 364: 363: 359: 356: 351: 342: 337: 334: 331: 326: 317: 312: 309: 306: 301: 292: 287: 284: 281: 276: 267: 262: 261: 260: 259: 256: 251: 242: 238: 227: 223: 220: 217: 213: 209: 205: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 177: 174: 173:Find sources: 169: 165: 161: 158: 152: 148: 144: 140: 135: 131: 126: 122: 118: 114: 110: 109: 105: 102: 99: 95: 92: 90: 87: 85: 82: 81: 80: 78: 73: 66: 63: 61: 60: 57: 56: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 622: 620: 600: 582: 556:transgender, 555: 551: 463: 446: 417: 365: 233: 221: 215: 207: 200: 194: 188: 182: 172: 159: 70: 53: 49: 47: 31: 28: 519:Tagishsimon 443:Leona Woods 198:free images 605:Xxanthippe 560:XOR'easter 486:puffing up 451:XOR'easter 374:WP:PROF#C1 370:WP:TOOSOON 627:talk page 434:G13 clock 354:(blether) 329:(blether) 304:(blether) 279:(blether) 254:(blether) 37:talk page 629:or in a 447:redirect 402:Thsmi002 241:WP:NPROF 157:View log 98:glossary 39:or in a 482:WP:PROF 464:Comment 426:WP:PROF 204:WP refs 192:scholar 130:protect 125:history 75:New to 601:Delete 583:Delete 439:notice 430:WP:GNG 366:Delete 349:Summit 324:Summit 299:Summit 274:Summit 249:Summit 237:WP:GNG 176:Google 134:delete 50:delete 552:trans 346:Girth 321:Girth 296:Girth 271:Girth 246:Girth 219:JSTOR 180:books 164:Stats 151:views 143:watch 139:links 16:< 609:talk 592:talk 586:cut. 564:talk 538:talk 523:talk 509:talk 494:talk 472:talk 455:talk 406:talk 385:talk 212:FENS 186:news 147:logs 121:talk 117:edit 55:Tone 428:or 422:yet 226:TWL 155:– ( 611:) 594:) 566:) 540:) 525:) 511:) 496:) 474:) 457:) 408:) 400:. 387:) 368:, 343:. 318:. 293:. 268:. 206:) 149:| 145:| 141:| 137:| 132:| 128:| 123:| 119:| 52:. 615:. 607:( 590:( 562:( 536:( 521:( 507:( 492:( 470:( 453:( 404:( 383:( 230:) 222:· 216:· 208:· 201:· 195:· 189:· 183:· 178:( 170:( 167:) 160:· 153:) 115:( 100:) 96:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Tone
08:41, 16 October 2019 (UTC)
Vivian Miranda

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Vivian Miranda
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Stats
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.