502:; but the reality is that the vast majority of it today is, and furthermore the most significant evidentiary challenges arise in the digital realm. I have no doubt that the subject of video evidence itself is sufficiently notable to merit its own article if and when it's developed (the Google Scholar link above turns up a
494:, but more wordily, which is my wont. For now, there's just not enough in this article to justify a separate article. It's just a one-sentence unreferenced definition and an arbitrary list of examples. This would be better-suited as a paragraph in
556:
I can see how you might read it that way, so let me put it another way. Although an article could be written on this topic, and if such an article was written, it would be sufficiently notable to be retained, at present, it is essentially a mere
197:
506:
of articles devoted to the subject), but for now, that separate treatment is not justified; the reader is better served seeing its treatment in context than a one-liner. In the absence of a merge, though,
424:
this is clearly a reasonable topic for an article, but none of the content is good. We have one sentence and a bunch of wiki-links; the "examples" listed are arbitrary and don't aid in understanding.
335:: the articles in the "See also" section collectively cover just about anything that could possibly be added here. Maybe redirect, I don't know if this is really a likely search term though.
191:
158:
105:
312:
90:
229:
356:
my search returns multiple secondary references. There are multiple incoming links. Looks like a stub that needs to be improved to me.
440:
131:
126:
135:
561:. The fact that sources exist that could be used in an article does not mean that dicdefs should be retained, and I don't think
118:
85:
78:
17:
292:
also says: "One perennial source of confusion is that a stub encyclopedia article looks very much like a dictionary entry..."
212:
179:
99:
95:
490:
for now, without prejudice to splitting out into a separate article if the amount of content justifies. I agree with
455:
393:
593:
275:
says: "A topic is presumed to merit an article if... It is not excluded under the What
Knowledge is not policy".
40:
173:
574:
549:
520:
476:
446:
414:
384:
367:
344:
324:
301:
284:
263:
241:
169:
60:
434:
340:
589:
545:
297:
280:
259:
237:
232:. This article is a definition with examples (and the source cited only mentions two of the examples).
36:
219:
320:
205:
122:
491:
430:
380:
362:
336:
74:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
588:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
562:
558:
541:
537:
495:
487:
426:
293:
276:
255:
233:
185:
53:
570:
516:
467:
405:
316:
114:
66:
499:
353:
376:
357:
57:
152:
498:, which would help to provide additional context. I recognize that historically,
289:
272:
251:
566:
531:
512:
584:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
458:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
396:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
148:
144:
140:
204:
536:
your rationale seems to contradict your vote, as per
464:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
402:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
596:). No further edits should be made to this page.
311:Note: This discussion has been included in the
250:stub just needs expansion; the concept passes
218:
8:
106:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
310:
313:list of Law-related deletion discussions
7:
24:
500:not all video evidence is digital
91:Introduction to deletion process
18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion
429:better handles the topic now.
1:
415:12:21, 25 February 2021 (UTC)
385:20:20, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
368:18:41, 23 February 2021 (UTC)
345:00:22, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
325:23:56, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
302:21:17, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
285:00:14, 18 February 2021 (UTC)
264:23:49, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
242:23:43, 17 February 2021 (UTC)
230:Knowledge is not a dictionary
375:. Perfectly valid law stub.
81:(AfD)? Read these primers!
613:
61:13:57, 14 March 2021 (UTC)
575:18:59, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
550:18:53, 8 March 2021 (UTC)
521:17:32, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
477:10:21, 5 March 2021 (UTC)
447:02:05, 4 March 2021 (UTC)
586:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
79:Articles for deletion
511:is my backup !vote.
254:with flying colors.
484:Merge and redirect
479:
475:
417:
413:
366:
327:
96:Guide to deletion
86:How to contribute
604:
565:says otherwise.
535:
496:digital evidence
488:digital evidence
474:
472:
465:
463:
461:
459:
443:
437:
427:Digital evidence
412:
410:
403:
401:
399:
397:
360:
223:
222:
208:
156:
138:
76:
54:Digital evidence
34:
612:
611:
607:
606:
605:
603:
602:
601:
600:
594:deletion review
529:
480:
468:
466:
454:
452:
441:
435:
418:
406:
404:
392:
390:
165:
129:
113:
110:
73:
70:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
610:
608:
599:
598:
580:
579:
578:
577:
553:
552:
524:
523:
462:
451:
450:
449:
400:
389:
388:
387:
370:
347:
329:
328:
308:
307:
306:
305:
304:
267:
266:
226:
225:
162:
115:Video evidence
109:
108:
103:
93:
88:
71:
69:
67:Video evidence
64:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
609:
597:
595:
591:
587:
582:
581:
576:
572:
568:
564:
560:
555:
554:
551:
547:
543:
539:
533:
528:
527:
526:
525:
522:
518:
514:
510:
505:
501:
497:
493:
489:
485:
482:
481:
478:
473:
471:
460:
457:
448:
444:
438:
432:
428:
423:
420:
419:
416:
411:
409:
398:
395:
386:
382:
378:
374:
371:
369:
364:
359:
355:
351:
348:
346:
342:
338:
334:
331:
330:
326:
322:
318:
314:
309:
303:
299:
295:
291:
288:
287:
286:
282:
278:
274:
271:
270:
269:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
246:
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
221:
217:
214:
211:
207:
203:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
178:
175:
171:
168:
167:Find sources:
163:
160:
154:
150:
146:
142:
137:
133:
128:
124:
120:
116:
112:
111:
107:
104:
101:
97:
94:
92:
89:
87:
84:
83:
82:
80:
75:
68:
65:
63:
62:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
585:
583:
508:
503:
492:power~enwiki
483:
469:
453:
431:power~enwiki
421:
407:
391:
372:
349:
337:Gnomingstuff
332:
247:
227:
215:
209:
201:
194:
188:
182:
176:
166:
72:
49:
47:
31:
28:
542:fgnievinski
294:fgnievinski
277:Magnolia677
256:fgnievinski
234:Magnolia677
192:free images
470:Sandstein
408:Sandstein
590:talk page
563:WP:NEXIST
559:WP:DICDEF
538:WP:NEXIST
317:Shellwood
37:talk page
592:or in a
456:Relisted
422:Redirect
394:Relisted
352:Passess
159:View log
100:glossary
50:redirect
39:or in a
377:Bearian
358:Jeepday
198:WP refs
186:scholar
132:protect
127:history
77:New to
58:Spartaz
354:WP:GNG
333:Delete
170:Google
136:delete
213:JSTOR
174:books
153:views
145:watch
141:links
16:<
571:talk
567:TJRC
546:talk
532:TJRC
517:talk
513:TJRC
509:keep
381:talk
373:Keep
363:talk
350:Keep
341:talk
321:talk
298:talk
290:WP:N
281:talk
273:WP:N
260:talk
252:WP:N
248:Keep
238:talk
228:Per
206:FENS
180:news
149:logs
123:talk
119:edit
504:lot
486:to
220:TWL
157:– (
52:to
573:)
548:)
540:.
519:)
445:)
439:,
383:)
343:)
323:)
315:.
300:)
283:)
262:)
240:)
200:)
151:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
134:|
130:|
125:|
121:|
56:.
569:(
544:(
534::
530:@
515:(
442:ν
436:π
433:(
379:(
365:)
361:(
339:(
319:(
296:(
279:(
258:(
236:(
224:)
216:·
210:·
202:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
177:·
172:(
164:(
161:)
155:)
117:(
102:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.