323:, at the very least. It involved cutting out possibly most of the bla bla. I also tried to inline some of the academic (sans url) sources in the references section, but I don't have the patience for that full effort at this point. I wouldn't object if someone else wanted to just delete them. But the page passes GNG, it seems. I'm unsure if it passes
362:
personal details, there are strong security reasons for keeping identity to yourself), and then requesting on a topic's talk page that an unbiased editor screen your requests and implement changes on your behalf. If talk page response is slow, all editors can also be pinged on their personal IP or
203:
238:
and I've today reverted more promotional content. Might be best at the COI board, but wanted to get the opinion of AfD people. A quick search shows it's notable, but I suspect the article should be restarted from scratch.
358:. I would recommend they do some research on both matters, and modify future editing accordingly. In the case of this page, that would likely necessitate admitting a conflict of interest (
197:
156:
296:
256:
276:
129:
124:
133:
116:
163:
88:
103:
350:. After becoming acclimated with the page's Wiki markup, I can safely observe that the posting editor(s) is unfamiliar with Knowledge (XXG)'s
235:
218:
327:? I'll do some additional research, although based on Joe's statement, at the very least a partial merge to Stanford might be appropriate.
185:
387:
364:
328:
120:
83:
76:
17:
403:- it's been heavily rewritten since the nomination. I still find it overly promotional, but I'm happy to withdraw the nomination
429:
412:
395:
372:
336:
308:
288:
268:
248:
179:
58:
97:
93:
175:
112:
64:
446:
351:
40:
225:
425:
408:
391:
368:
332:
304:
284:
244:
191:
324:
442:
264:
54:
36:
421:
211:
404:
300:
280:
240:
72:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
441:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
260:
355:
320:
236:
https://xtools.wmflabs.org/articleinfo/en.wikipedia.org/Virtual_Human_Interaction_Lab
150:
234:
Blatently promotional, mostly created by a clear COI account according to
420:. Has enought sources for WP:GNG. Could definatetly do with a clean-up.
52:. The nominator has withdrawn, and there are no delete !votes present.
437:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
363:
account talk pages. Good luck, and welcome to
Knowledge (XXG)!
146:
142:
138:
210:
224:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
449:). No further edits should be made to this page.
356:strong guidelines concerning editing with a bias
297:list of Environment-related deletion discussions
295:Note: This discussion has been included in the
275:Note: This discussion has been included in the
255:Note: This discussion has been included in the
257:list of California-related deletion discussions
277:list of Education-related deletion discussions
8:
104:Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
294:
274:
254:
386:. There seems to be enough coverage.
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
319:I think I've saved this page from
24:
89:Introduction to deletion process
1:
113:Virtual Human Interaction Lab
65:Virtual Human Interaction Lab
59:02:02, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
430:23:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
413:19:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
396:23:38, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
373:19:57, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
337:19:49, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
309:07:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
289:07:28, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
269:22:16, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
249:20:08, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
79:(AfD)? Read these primers!
466:
439:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
77:Articles for deletion
311:
291:
271:
94:Guide to deletion
84:How to contribute
457:
229:
228:
214:
166:
154:
136:
74:
57:
34:
465:
464:
460:
459:
458:
456:
455:
454:
453:
447:deletion review
352:stylistic norms
171:
162:
127:
111:
108:
71:
68:
53:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
463:
461:
452:
451:
433:
432:
422:Britishfinance
415:
398:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
340:
339:
313:
312:
292:
272:
232:
231:
168:
107:
106:
101:
91:
86:
69:
67:
62:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
462:
450:
448:
444:
440:
435:
434:
431:
427:
423:
419:
416:
414:
410:
406:
402:
399:
397:
393:
389:
388:66.198.222.67
385:
382:
381:
374:
370:
366:
365:66.198.222.67
361:
357:
353:
349:
346:
345:
344:
343:
342:
341:
338:
334:
330:
329:66.198.222.67
326:
322:
318:
315:
314:
310:
306:
302:
301:Coolabahapple
298:
293:
290:
286:
282:
281:Coolabahapple
278:
273:
270:
266:
262:
258:
253:
252:
251:
250:
246:
242:
237:
227:
223:
220:
217:
213:
209:
205:
202:
199:
196:
193:
190:
187:
184:
181:
177:
174:
173:Find sources:
169:
165:
161:
158:
152:
148:
144:
140:
135:
131:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
109:
105:
102:
99:
95:
92:
90:
87:
85:
82:
81:
80:
78:
73:
66:
63:
61:
60:
56:
55:North America
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
438:
436:
417:
400:
383:
359:
347:
325:WP:CORPDEPTH
316:
233:
221:
215:
207:
200:
194:
188:
182:
172:
159:
70:
49:
47:
31:
28:
261:IntoThinAir
198:free images
50:speedy keep
443:talk page
37:talk page
445:or in a
401:Comment.
317:Comment.
157:View log
98:glossary
39:or in a
204:WP refs
192:scholar
130:protect
125:history
75:New to
321:WP:TNT
176:Google
134:delete
219:JSTOR
180:books
164:Stats
151:views
143:watch
139:links
16:<
426:talk
418:Keep
409:talk
392:talk
384:Keep
369:talk
354:and
348:Note
333:talk
305:talk
285:talk
265:talk
245:talk
212:FENS
186:news
147:logs
121:talk
117:edit
405:Joe
360:not
241:Joe
226:TWL
155:– (
428:)
411:)
394:)
371:)
335:)
307:)
299:.
287:)
279:.
267:)
259:.
247:)
206:)
149:|
145:|
141:|
137:|
132:|
128:|
123:|
119:|
424:(
407:(
390:(
367:(
331:(
303:(
283:(
263:(
243:(
230:)
222:·
216:·
208:·
201:·
195:·
189:·
183:·
178:(
170:(
167:)
160:·
153:)
115:(
100:)
96:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.