447:. Google Scholar focuses on aggregating citations for books, not newspaper articles, but you can see his writing is widely cited, even if Google News would be a better way to demonstrate this. Now, if you want to take out that he's an author from the lede, I think that's reasonable and would support the change. But there shouldn't be any question about his notability.
303:
The finding from the previous nomination discussion was accurate. What makes you think that his citation numbers are "trivial"? They were not trivial a year ago and have only increased since then. This entry does have room for improvement (citation formatting is the first thing I see) but this
85:
186:
396:
Google scholar is primarily for academic or scholarly works and isn't a fair measure for a journalist, especially not an entertainment journalist. Washington Post authors on popular topics like
412:
don't have ANY scholar citations, but we wouldn't question their notability. Those journos, like Pincus-Roth, are well represented in a Google search or a news search and are notable.
586:-- I don't see what has changed since the last AfD, where the article was kept. The tone is somewhat neutral, and the subject appears notable, per positions held and awards received.
80:
139:
542:
275:
248:
180:
562:
146:
443:
As a journalist he's got a lot of citations, but as an author, he has one book. To clarify (in case there's a 3rd nomination?), here's a screenshot from the
112:
107:
524:
What positions held satisfy WP:JOURNALIST? What is special about the scope of his work? How hoes authorship of a non notable unviewed book help?
116:
226:
99:
613:
595:
574:
554:
533:
515:
488:
456:
438:
421:
391:
371:
351:
313:
294:
267:
240:
64:
17:
334:
201:
168:
225:
of sources there are no independent reliable sources that have any depth of coverage about him. The awards are not major.
473:
634:
40:
347:
162:
158:
103:
609:
529:
434:
387:
236:
499:
208:
343:
630:
591:
570:
550:
511:
484:
452:
417:
367:
330:
309:
36:
409:
362:
I wasn't trying to hide anything about authoring the article. I don't have any conflict of interest.
222:
194:
95:
70:
605:
525:
430:
383:
232:
174:
29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
629:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
587:
566:
546:
507:
448:
413:
363:
326:
305:
338:
218:
280:
253:
55:
401:
133:
604:
What positions held? Good jobs but nothing notable. What awards? None are major.
405:
229:
is a failed proposal so should not be used. His citation numbers are trivial.
426:
And it was you that linked to google scholar to claim he was widely cited
397:
378:
Following the scholar link above we can see that his highest cited work
231:
Last afd was tainted by a bad faithed nomination and sock puppetry.
623:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
476:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
444:
502:
based on positions held, scope of work, and authorship of
337:) is the creator of the page that is the subject of this
86:
Articles for deletion/Zachary Pincus-Roth (2nd nomination)
427:
129:
125:
121:
193:
482:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,
207:
43:). No further edits should be made to this page.
637:). No further edits should be made to this page.
543:list of Journalism-related deletion discussions
276:list of Television-related deletion discussions
249:list of Journalism-related deletion discussions
563:list of Maryland-related deletion discussions
8:
561:Note: This debate has been included in the
541:Note: This debate has been included in the
274:Note: This debate has been included in the
247:Note: This debate has been included in the
445:second page of his Google Scholar citations
560:
540:
273:
246:
81:Articles for deletion/Zachary Pincus-Roth
304:clearly meets standards for notability.
227:Knowledge (XXG):Notability (journalists)
78:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
7:
77:
24:
382:has bee cited 3 times. Trivial.
429:. Trying to have it both ways?
314:07:45, 30 September 2016 (UTC)
295:11:40, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
268:11:39, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
241:07:22, 29 September 2016 (UTC)
1:
614:04:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
534:04:06, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
65:11:07, 15 October 2016 (UTC)
596:19:20, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
575:19:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
555:19:16, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
516:03:04, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
489:02:54, 7 October 2016 (UTC)
457:12:03, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
439:10:35, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
422:02:38, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
392:02:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC)
372:02:40, 3 October 2016 (UTC)
352:14:14, 1 October 2016 (UTC)
654:
221:journo. While there is a
626:Please do not modify it.
32:Please do not modify it.
76:AfDs for this article:
323:Note to closing admin
96:Zachary Pincus-Roth
71:Zachary Pincus-Roth
577:
557:
491:
344:Shawn in Montreal
342:
297:
270:
63:
645:
628:
498:appears to meet
487:
481:
479:
477:
320:
291:
288:
287:
283:
264:
261:
260:
256:
212:
211:
197:
149:
137:
119:
62:
60:
53:
34:
653:
652:
648:
647:
646:
644:
643:
642:
641:
635:deletion review
624:
492:
483:
472:
470:
289:
285:
284:
281:
262:
258:
257:
254:
154:
145:
110:
94:
91:
74:
56:
54:
48:The result was
41:deletion review
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
651:
649:
640:
639:
619:
618:
617:
616:
599:
598:
579:
578:
558:
538:
537:
536:
519:
518:
480:
469:
468:
467:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
461:
460:
459:
376:
375:
374:
355:
354:
317:
316:
298:
271:
230:
215:
214:
151:
90:
89:
88:
83:
75:
73:
68:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
650:
638:
636:
632:
627:
621:
620:
615:
611:
607:
606:duffbeerforme
603:
602:
601:
600:
597:
593:
589:
585:
581:
580:
576:
572:
568:
564:
559:
556:
552:
548:
544:
539:
535:
531:
527:
526:duffbeerforme
523:
522:
521:
520:
517:
513:
509:
505:
501:
500:WP:JOURNALIST
497:
494:
493:
490:
486:
485:North America
478:
475:
458:
454:
450:
446:
442:
441:
440:
436:
432:
431:duffbeerforme
428:
425:
424:
423:
419:
415:
411:
407:
403:
399:
395:
394:
393:
389:
385:
384:duffbeerforme
381:
377:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
353:
349:
345:
340:
336:
332:
328:
324:
319:
318:
315:
311:
307:
302:
299:
296:
293:
292:
277:
272:
269:
266:
265:
250:
245:
244:
243:
242:
238:
234:
233:duffbeerforme
228:
224:
220:
210:
206:
203:
200:
196:
192:
188:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
167:
164:
160:
157:
156:Find sources:
152:
148:
144:
141:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
97:
93:
92:
87:
84:
82:
79:
72:
69:
67:
66:
61:
59:
51:
44:
42:
38:
33:
27:
26:
19:
625:
622:
583:
503:
495:
471:
402:Rachel Elson
379:
322:
300:
279:
252:
216:
204:
198:
190:
183:
177:
171:
165:
155:
142:
57:
49:
47:
31:
28:
588:K.e.coffman
567:K.e.coffman
547:K.e.coffman
508:Safehaven86
449:Bangabandhu
414:Bangabandhu
410:Donna Britt
406:Steven Goff
364:Bangabandhu
327:Bangabandhu
306:Bangabandhu
181:free images
58:Sandstein
631:talk page
37:talk page
633:or in a
582:Leaning
504:Avenue Q
474:Relisted
408:or even
398:Pat Goss
380:Avenue Q
335:contribs
140:View log
39:or in a
219:notable
187:WP refs
175:scholar
113:protect
108:history
159:Google
117:delete
496:Keep:
202:JSTOR
163:books
147:Stats
134:views
126:watch
122:links
16:<
610:talk
592:talk
584:Keep
571:talk
551:talk
530:talk
512:talk
453:talk
435:talk
418:talk
388:talk
368:talk
348:talk
331:talk
310:talk
301:Keep
237:talk
217:Non
195:FENS
169:news
130:logs
104:talk
100:edit
50:keep
339:XfD
290:ter
286:Car
282:Jim
263:ter
259:Car
255:Jim
223:lot
209:TWL
138:– (
52:.
612:)
594:)
573:)
565:.
553:)
545:.
532:)
514:)
506:.
455:)
437:)
420:)
404:,
400:,
390:)
370:)
350:)
341:.
333:•
325::
321:—
312:)
278:.
251:.
239:)
189:)
132:|
128:|
124:|
120:|
115:|
111:|
106:|
102:|
608:(
590:(
569:(
549:(
528:(
510:(
451:(
433:(
416:(
386:(
366:(
346:(
329:(
308:(
235:(
213:)
205:·
199:·
191:·
184:·
178:·
172:·
166:·
161:(
153:(
150:)
143:·
136:)
98:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.