Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Zammad - Knowledge (XXG)

Source đź“ť

491:
can the “keep” voters share the best three pieces of coverage of this topic in reliable independent sources? It’s not relevant to this discussion whether or not there’s a long-standing article on de.wiki (there are thousands of articles on en.wiki that don’t meet our notability requirements. We just
200: 161: 231:
Article about a piece of software sourced entirely to self-published or related sources. A search for other possible sources shows nothing better that would indicate notability.
270: 290: 310: 330: 372:
the additional sources are certainly an improvement. I’m not sure whether they’re enough to establish notability. Let’s see what the consensus of other editors is.
194: 93: 108: 353:
The article is currently based on 16 secondary sources (as well as 28 primary sources). How many secondary sources would be required for notability?
88: 81: 17: 102: 98: 463: 413: 568: 40: 215: 182: 134: 129: 138: 121: 536:. I think this shows that "it is discussed in reliable sources as significant in its particular field", as 537: 564: 176: 36: 545: 450: 254:
I have added further secondary sources to the article to underline notability. What do you think? --
427: 208: 172: 58: 359: 259: 549: 501: 481: 454: 431: 404: 381: 364: 342: 322: 302: 282: 263: 240: 63: 393:
google search does not find anything. As mentioned, references all seem to be primary sources.
497: 399: 377: 338: 318: 298: 278: 236: 222: 77: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
563:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
477: 390: 541: 446: 423: 55: 52:. Insufficient discussion to establish notability, but sources might exist in German. 508: 441:
It seems it has received coverage in a number of German-language sources, and it has
354: 255: 188: 493: 394: 373: 334: 314: 294: 274: 249: 232: 155: 473: 125: 526: 514: 520: 492:
haven’t got round to deleting them yet and de.wiki is no different).
442: 117: 69: 559:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
532: 466:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
416:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
151: 147: 143: 207: 443:
a long-standing article on the German Knowledge (XXG)
472:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 422:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 221: 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 571:). No further edits should be made to this page. 329:Note: This discussion has been included in the 309:Note: This discussion has been included in the 289:Note: This discussion has been included in the 269:Note: This discussion has been included in the 271:list of Technology-related deletion discussions 291:list of Computing-related deletion discussions 311:list of Internet-related deletion discussions 8: 331:list of Germany-related deletion discussions 109:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 328: 308: 288: 268: 506:Sources cited in the article include 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 389:No claims in the article that meet 24: 94:Introduction to deletion process 1: 550:19:21, 28 January 2021 (UTC) 502:03:46, 28 January 2021 (UTC) 482:03:55, 21 January 2021 (UTC) 455:12:51, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 432:03:24, 12 January 2021 (UTC) 382:10:33, 10 January 2021 (UTC) 365:16:48, 11 January 2021 (UTC) 264:08:18, 04 January 2021 (UTC) 64:01:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC) 405:19:15, 8 January 2021 (UTC) 343:14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 323:14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 303:14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 283:14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 241:14:33, 2 January 2021 (UTC) 84:(AfD)? Read these primers! 588: 561:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 82:Articles for deletion 484: 434: 403: 363: 345: 325: 305: 285: 99:Guide to deletion 89:How to contribute 579: 471: 469: 467: 421: 419: 417: 397: 357: 253: 226: 225: 211: 159: 141: 79: 62: 34: 587: 586: 582: 581: 580: 578: 577: 576: 575: 569:deletion review 485: 462: 460: 435: 412: 410: 247: 168: 132: 116: 113: 76: 73: 53: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 585: 583: 574: 573: 555: 554: 553: 552: 470: 459: 458: 457: 420: 409: 408: 407: 384: 367: 347: 346: 326: 306: 286: 266: 229: 228: 165: 112: 111: 106: 96: 91: 74: 72: 67: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 584: 572: 570: 566: 562: 557: 556: 551: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 529: 528: 523: 522: 517: 516: 511: 510: 509:Linux-Magazin 505: 504: 503: 499: 495: 490: 487: 486: 483: 479: 475: 468: 465: 456: 452: 448: 444: 440: 437: 436: 433: 429: 425: 418: 415: 406: 401: 396: 392: 388: 385: 383: 379: 375: 371: 368: 366: 361: 356: 352: 349: 348: 344: 340: 336: 332: 327: 324: 320: 316: 312: 307: 304: 300: 296: 292: 287: 284: 280: 276: 272: 267: 265: 261: 257: 251: 245: 244: 243: 242: 238: 234: 224: 220: 217: 214: 210: 206: 202: 199: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 174: 171: 170:Find sources: 166: 163: 157: 153: 149: 145: 140: 136: 131: 127: 123: 119: 115: 114: 110: 107: 104: 100: 97: 95: 92: 90: 87: 86: 85: 83: 78: 71: 68: 66: 65: 60: 57: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 560: 558: 538:WP:NSOFTWARE 531: 525: 519: 513: 507: 488: 461: 438: 411: 386: 369: 350: 230: 218: 212: 204: 197: 191: 185: 179: 169: 75: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 540:puts it. -- 195:free images 542:Un assiolo 447:Un assiolo 565:talk page 424:Barkeep49 37:talk page 567:or in a 527:golem.de 515:heise.de 464:Relisted 414:Relisted 355:Schokita 256:Schokita 162:View log 103:glossary 59:a·po·des 39:or in a 521:LANline 494:Mccapra 489:Comment 395:Jeepday 374:Mccapra 370:Comment 351:Comment 335:Mccapra 315:Mccapra 295:Mccapra 275:Mccapra 250:Mccapra 233:Mccapra 201:WP refs 189:scholar 135:protect 130:history 80:New to 474:Daniel 391:WP:GNG 387:Delete 173:Google 139:delete 118:Zammad 70:Zammad 216:JSTOR 177:books 156:views 148:watch 144:links 16:< 546:talk 530:and 498:talk 478:talk 451:talk 445:. -- 439:Keep 428:talk 400:talk 378:talk 360:talk 339:talk 319:talk 299:talk 279:talk 260:talk 237:talk 209:FENS 183:news 152:logs 126:talk 122:edit 56:Wug· 533:t3n 246:Hi 223:TWL 160:– ( 548:) 524:, 518:, 512:, 500:) 480:) 453:) 430:) 380:) 341:) 333:. 321:) 313:. 301:) 293:. 281:) 273:. 262:) 239:) 203:) 154:| 150:| 146:| 142:| 137:| 133:| 128:| 124:| 54:— 544:( 496:( 476:( 449:( 426:( 402:) 398:( 376:( 362:) 358:( 337:( 317:( 297:( 277:( 258:( 252:: 248:@ 235:( 227:) 219:· 213:· 205:· 198:· 192:· 186:· 180:· 175:( 167:( 164:) 158:) 120:( 105:) 101:( 61:​

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
Wug·
a·po·des
01:40, 3 February 2021 (UTC)
Zammad

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Zammad
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log
Google
books
news
scholar
free images

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑