Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Zeek

1125:

contains what the company says about itself, not the journalism itself, see: "Though the app has an easy-to-use graphic interface, its complexity lies in the logistics of transferring the credit from person to person in exchange for money. Zeek serves as the connection between the two parties, in place of a face-to-face meeting"...."The company is beginning with a pilot in Israel, with hopes of entering additional markets, such as Asia, Latin America, and Europe, in the future"...."In many cases, consumers find pursuing a refund more trouble than it’s worth, so they take the line of least resistance – settling for a credit, in the hope that they will find something else they want from the same store. But for those who can’t, Zeek has a solution – a platform that lets buyers, sellers, and barterers of store credits to find each other, no matter where they are"...."While Zeek is clearly a made-in-Israel app – it could have evolved only in a country where refunds are not a matter of course – the app is useful abroad as well. Zeek has tens of thousands of users in Israel, as well as in Europe and the US, where it is used to buy and sell gift certificates. The ability to break certificates into smaller chunks is a useful one for users abroad, according to Zeek. Plus, the fact that it’s all cloud-based makes Zeek convenient and user-friendly. “When you sell the gift vouchers or store credits, all you have to do is send it to us,” the company says. “Once it is received and approved, you will be contacted and we will forward you the money in the most convenient way: either check, PayPal or directly to your bank account. If you purchase a store credit or voucher, this item will be sent to you by mail.”...."If you’ve ever received a gift voucher for a store you rarely or never shop in, then Zeek could prove useful. The marketplace and mobile app lets you buy and sell unwanted store credit, including gift vouchers, credit notes, gift cards and e-vouchers. The seller gets to offload credit that is of no use or before it expires, and the buyer gets to purchase credit at a significant discount. Meanwhile, Zeeks take a commission on each transaction. Win-win-win, you might say"...."Originally launched out of Tel Aviv in 2014, Zeek has since expanded to the U.K., which is now a key market for the startup and part of the reason for today’s announced fund-raise. The new capital will be used to consolidate its position in the U.K. and for further international expansion. This will include a hiring drive as Zeek plans to increase headcount in order to accelerate that growth"...."The company’s app and marketplace lets you trade unwanted store credit, including gift vouchers, credit notes, gift cards and e-vouchers. The seller gets to offload credit that is of no use or before it expires, and the buyer gets to purchase credit at a significant discount"....In turn, Zeek takes a commission on each transaction. It’s a model identical to extremely well-funded U.S. startup Raise, which closed a $ 56 million round of Series B funding early last year, putting Zeek’s bank balance into sharp contrast"...."Fresh off a $ 9.5 million Series B funding round, Zeek is planning on expanding beyond its Israeli headquarters and moving into Europe. The company already has a presence in the U.K. — it’s been there since December 2014 — and it now looks as though demand and additional capital will be taking this gift card-specific marketplace to new horizons"....Zeek, an Israeli app company for unwanted store credit, lets you sell store credit (those receipts you get when you return an item that usually ends up getting washed in the laundry), gift cards and e-vouchers below face value. Zeek recently announced that it has raised $ 3 million from....". None of that was actual journalism efforts but instead actually the company supplying its own information "coated" as news (none of that came close at all for significance, substance or of course "news"), once we accept that at any and all costs, we're an advertising website.

2466:, all of the essence of PR has in fact stayed and has actually become worse now that the PR sources listed. There is no amount of copyediting that fixes an article when its core and basis is advertising and that alone, because we are essentially simply fashioning it into something either the same or worse. Now, the last article listed contains noticeable amounts of interviews, such as beginning paragraphs, "Mr Eral admits", "Mr Eral saw", "Mr Eral talks about..." and this continues as the interview continues itself, and the information about some other matters about business school and education, the article simply contains a few other paragraphs until it ends, so that was hardly journalism at all, if a large amount was simply an interview (the last sets of paragraphs, for example, are all either interviews or company-supplied information, nothing actually independent). What still says, as my analyses had shown before above, is that this is clearly a company intent with finding and establishing any platforms it can obtain and use as advertising and PR, and it shows when a large amount of "news" are simply either interviews or company-supplied information such as the background of company-involved fundings and finances. Also, it's quite unlikely that any other amount of news would actually help, especially given what I have clearly stated above which was the concerns of using whatever news, because of the severity of 2458:, so that shows the peculiar similarities in the past 2 articles I've examined, showing the essence of interviewed information also, the fact how carefully crafted the article is. Now, the next article is also as blatant in that it noticeably contains interviewed information, and of course focuses only largely with what the company's current status is about funding and finances, it goes to say "Meanwhile, Zeek co-founder and CEO Daniel Zelkind tells me the startup isn’t yet profitable but implies that it could be if it chose to", this is an obvious attempt at seeking to interest clients and investors by enticing them about available business opportunities. The next one then goes to state about ""To use Zeek you simply need to download the free app from the App Store or Google Play, upload an unwanted gift voucher, set the price wanted and wait for a buyer. Zeek will send cash directly to sellers and vouchers to buyers, so everyone can get on with the purchases they would prefer to make, with either the cash they wanted, or a bonus on their voucher, which this is entirely PR and something only the company would say about itself, certainly not some uninvolved journalist, and then the article goes to en with an interview, but not before going into specifics about the company's business and finances. Also, see how the company article has changed from 2197:

sugarcoated PR, and are not immune from company-supplied information, therefore the company can and is in fact saying whatever it wants, without having to pay or use another platform, because the news publisher is allowing them to use their in clear exchange for "publishing news". What is always by far important than accepting potentially acceptable articles, are not allowing, at any costs, advertisements, because that's exactly what we have worked to not accept for so long, so by allowing this article and other articles, it would cause a snowball and domino affect to then become excuses of "Well, that advertising article was Keep at AfD because people simply listed sources? I'll list my own sources and republished PR without any worries since no one will likely delete my own advertising". Stating that this may be of interest to viewers in fact not the case, because listing such blatant company information and PR sources, are only what their clients and investors want to see, because no one else aside from these intentions, would care to learn about the company's services, plans or interviewed thoughts by the businesspeople, that's why PR exists, for companies themselves to state what

2570:, in that the news source was simply publishing what the man and company said, not what said news source own words were. "Reputation" means nothing because there has been notoriety as it is that any source can easily republish PR and-or have the person themselves, such as the CEO or businessperson author the "news column" itself, so it is never convincing to state that any news source is automatically acceptable simply because it's a "news source", because once we start accepting anything that comes from there, we're not the closely analyzing encyclopedia that hopes and is careful to not accept advertising. There has been consensus also as it is at AfD that these news sources will even state themselves "This information comes from the company", showing how it was not even the news publication's own efforts, they simply republished company information. The notability guidelines themselves state that any sources must be actual substantial coverage itself, and because I noted above that the listed quotes were not substantial or independent, it's not a convincing source. 2892:- (1) The first 2 are ones that have been listed and counted as unconvincing (see analysis carefully above so mentioning those 2 new links are not acceptable and (2) the last one is literally talking about gift cards and how the business is making money, and it goes to talk about its own plans about money....That's not news, that's PR. As consensus recently has shown, simply iterating that there are news sources meaning nothing if the analysis and Delete votes above have explicitly shown it is the contents the matter, because, hell, the source could even be listing a press release and "Say: Press release by " and that would be, nothing, literally nothing, except that they hired a PR agent for advertising. There is no substantial coverage if a source is simply repeating what the company's own information about their own business plans, because when it's a specific as these, it's not only showing the news source submitted every word, but that the company supplied that exact information. 2449:. “Once it is received and approved, you will be contacted and we will forward you the money in the most convenient way: either check, PayPal or directly to your bank account. If you purchase a store credit or voucher, this item will be sent to you by mail.” The last sentence then goes to actually state information about the investing, that is by classic examples of past AfD Deletions, obvious company-supplied information and PR. Having such blatant company-supplied information therefore clearly affects actually calling it "journalism", especially if there are budget cuts involved, therefore there's not only leniency in what's published, there's then leniency about 3629:- None of the sources referenced in the article have been written by the organization or any of its members and disclosure of collaboration was not used in the articles. This leads me to believe that the media coverage provided is independent by nature. Every time a journalist interview's a company's point person information is exchanged. Although I can understand how some of it can pass as self-promotion, I think the extent of the coverage exceeds well beyond standard media coverage by far. Furthermore, there is a wide range of information provided by the article's sources that details much more than just fundraising or the investors behind 2445:

about Zeek again but that's only because of the CEO and how it's stated how the company can be used, and the "benefits it causes!"....until it gets to puffery again "Zeek has tens of thousands of users in Israel, as well as in Europe and the US, where it is used to buy and sell gift certificates. The ability to break certificates into smaller chunks is a useful one for users abroad, according to Zeek. Plus, the fact that it’s all cloud-based makes Zeek convenient and user-friendly", the information following this then goes to state “When you sell the gift vouchers or store credits, all you have to do is send it to us,”

3107:, but let not the massive sources and information suggest otherwise, it's simply consisting of trivial and unconvincing information about the company, again an example is specifying information about company gift cards, which no one cares about aside from clients and investors and therefore only belongs at the company website instead. The article then actually cares to go to specifics about the numbers involving said clients and investors and of course the sources repeat this also, because it's unacceptable to simply state the fact it's a known news source automatically makes it acceptable, because as notorious as 3431:. I am amazed that the Forbes/sites (not Forbes) has been considered a reliable source when it is very obvious that there is no journalistic oversight. In many of these sources presented, the amount coverage is so limited that the entirety of it has been pasted into this AfD. That's not indepth coverage. The rest of the "news" is essentially very brief pieces about funding which clearly show that they have been placed by the company. None of this is useful for notability. More importantly, I see this as a case of a COI editor pushing to "keep" the article. -- 2440:- The sources above are entirely still PR, because for one example the first article listed, is not only containing company-supplied information, the beginning itself states "the benefits that Zeek gives you!" No one says that unless they have financial gains and interests in the company itself, this article actually never actually focuses with the company as largely as it may first seem, because the large amounts of first paragraphs are about other things such as the political events happening, and the company is finally started to be mentioned in the 525:

ability to break certificates into smaller chunks is a useful one for users abroad, according to Zeek. Plus, the fact that it’s all cloud-based makes Zeek convenient and user-friendly. “When you sell the gift vouchers or store credits, all you have to do is send it to us,” the company says. “Once it is received and approved, you will be contacted and we will forward you the money in the most convenient way: either check, PayPal or directly to your bank account. If you purchase a store credit or voucher, this item will be sent to you by mail.”

3112:

far as adding a massive amount of company PR, but then simply stated they were removing the advert templates themselves simply because they were the author, but that they certainly were not involved with the company....yet they never made any other contributions and they also focused quite heavily with this article alone, that's not something anyone would emphasize as boldly unless they had gains in this article itself. Note one sentence that was added "The company has the potential"....

81: 3679: 2052:- I want to also add that the Keep votes themselves have not either challenged the analysis listed, which includes my own above, or substantiated themselves in any shape or form. Honesty is that not one single source actually came close to becoming both substantial and non-PR. One particular user has come to continue listing that "major news sources" are alone to accept, but it's the 2454:

company in those sentences then simply goes into sales-pitch mode talking about how the company works and how it can be used, next, is how the buying and selling methods work. This then goes to state interviewed information from the businessman and then goes to other specifics about the company's current business plans and actually then goes to end with the same damn sentence about

2655: 3749:

silly (e.g., unlinking red links and poor grammar changes) and the articles and AfDs chosen for editing/participation seem scattershot. But telling in the AfD !votes is a sensitivity to whether an article is promotional (delete) and if the subject appears in a sufficient number of sources per Google search (keep). I wish I had more to go on for a sockpuppet report.

3805: 1938: 2339:, although perhaps on a slightly weaker level. Some sources in the article and listed above provide coverage that is more on the routine side, while still providing some non-routine style coverage. However, other sources provide more comprehensive and thorough coverage, such as the examples provided below, which are 52:. Although the discussion is leaning towards "delete", opinion remains divided, in good faith, over whether the sources are of sufficient quality to sustain an article. This also applies if one only counts the views of established editors. It seems that the attempts at canvassing have had no apparent effect. 3516:

I am well aware of the concerns raised by opposing editors regarding the article. But I don't believe they are justified at this stage of the article. The subject here should be the actual content of the article as opposed to how the information as it is presented by the media, although I do think It

3352:

I have clearly and staunchly listed exactly the unacceptable parts from those listed sources above, and I have also been clear that we cannot compare this to other articles especially worldwide ones such as Google, Facebook, Twitter, etc. because they are not the same subject, I repeat myself to make

3147:

The mobile app is open to both buyers and sellers, and provides a secure platform for voucher transaction. Zeek's operations also accommodates the purchase of gift cards by consumers at a discounted rate compared to their face value. In April 2015, over 80,000 people were using the mobile app, and in

2444:

and even then, that's simply about ""Zeek aims to replace the hassle by transferring credits to someone who wants them, eliminating the inevitable squabbling over refunds", company puffery and that alone, until the focus goes to politics again, and then after a few other paragraphs, it starts talking

2196:

When an article is not acceptable, is when there's enough to suggest we should otherwise not accept it, and in clear cases, it's because of PR intents and actions, which is the case here, the Delete votes including mine and then my analyses above have shown these exact news sources are in fact simply

1691:

Sellers of vouchers will be paid by PayPal or bank transfer. Be warned, however, that you have to wait up to 14 business days for the payment to be made. The Israeli company, which has been trading for more than a year, says the delay is for security reasons. It says the money raised by sales is held

1681:

The app allows sellers to scan in their unwanted gift card and set the price they want for it. Buyers, some of whom might be in the store to make a purchase, can buy the unwanted credit for a discount of around 3%-10%. Electronic vouchers can be redeemed instantly; others have to bought as a physical

1633:

When Itay Eral realised a voucher he received as a wedding present had expired before he had a chance to use it, he decided to do something about it. The result it Zeek, a mobile marketplace for unwanted gift vouchers and cards, where sellers are charged a fee of 7% of the card’s value and people can

3111:

is becoming, we must take sources, especially ones heavily focused with company-supplied information, lest we become a PR webhost, which is clearly what the company and SPA users involved with this, considered it to be. There's particularly one user of concern, Eyaladam, which not only went to go as

2819:

An interesting suggestion, but any closer should also keep in mind that a no consensus close is allowed in AfD discussions, if such closure is warranted. Other potential closure options are also available. Discussions are not required to be closed exclusively as either keep or delete. Such either-or

2177:

supporting it. Appears the article has evolved substantially from it's first draft and I don't see any promotional puffery. The article states facts and is well sourced. There is lots of room on wikipedia -- and this article may be of interest to researchers/readers. Since when does an article about

2113:

BTW the recently deleted content "Most vouchers are sold for around 3%-10% off the card's original value. transactions are paid through a PayPal or via Bank transfer. Sellers may be forced to wait for up to 14 days business days due to security reasons before they can receive payment. Meanwhile, the

777:

Originally launched out of Tel Aviv in 2014, Zeek has since expanded to the U.K., which is now a key market for the startup and part of the reason for today’s announced fund-raise. The new capital will be used to consolidate its position in the U.K. and for further international expansion. This will

643:

The company’s site and app sells gift cards to major brands, as well as resells unused or unwanted gift cards. Reselling would presumably put a dent in what Zeek‘s press release says is a staggering $ 100 billion in unused gift cards, up from an estimated $ 41 billion in unclaimed gift cards between

2741:

comments here before the user even responds. Also, I'm not ignoring any aspects of the discussion here, although you seem to entirely ignore those in favor of retaining the article, as though if any !voters for retention are all in error. Sorry, but this seems a bit biased. It's all good though. No

1361:

The awards listed are not significant, and Red Herring is pay-per-play. The rest is about investments, and "being featured in the news" which is a hallmark of such promotional articles. The sources offered above are not convincing either, as they hue closely to the company messaging and are PR-like

821:

Fresh off a $ 9.5 million Series B funding round, Zeek is planning on expanding beyond its Israeli headquarters and moving into Europe. The company already has a presence in the U.K. — it’s been there since December 2014 — and it now looks as though demand and additional capital will be taking this

740:

If you’ve ever received a gift voucher for a store you rarely or never shop in, then Zeek could prove useful. The marketplace and mobile app lets you buy and sell unwanted store credit, including gift vouchers, credit notes, gift cards and e-vouchers. The seller gets to offload credit that is of no

707:

Zeek is on a mission to rescue $ 100 billion worth of unused gift cards and vouchers for users. Zeek is a web-based and app marketplace platform that allows users to buy gift vouchers for over 350 leading UK brands at discounted rates as well as sell their unwanted gift vouchers quickly and easily.

464:

Though the app has an easy-to-use graphic interface, its complexity lies in the logistics of transferring the credit from person to person in exchange for money. Zeek serves as the connection between the two parties, in place of a face-to-face meeting, but the process is still somewhat clumsy. This

3748:

This account was created on October 2, in the middle of this AfD. Many of the article edits were without merit and I reverted them. If this is a sockpuppet, then it's one that is seemingly trying to appear independent (behavior-wise) of a participant in this AfD, as the article edits were kind of

3704:

WP:GNG is rather thin here because, as shown by the analysis the sources themselves are PR and so is the article and this also shows by the fact this article's history suggests it was only started by PR in and of itself, and that's something we take quite seriously, lest we become a damned website

2721:

comes across as not just snide and dismissive, but disingenuously reductive - the poster has outlined many problems with the present article, making out that fixing a lesser one than its extremely dubious notability is the one fix constitutes you deliberately ignoring the previous discussion right

516:

In many cases, consumers find pursuing a refund more trouble than it’s worth, so they take the line of least resistance – settling for a credit, in the hope that they will find something else they want from the same store. But for those who can’t, Zeek has a solution – a platform that lets buyers,

3236:

companies and private, venture-funded ones. The former are independently audited and under a great deal of scrutiny. The latter could be lying through their teeth, and the Knowledge (XXG) editors are taking this at face value, turning this promotional materials into something that is (ostensibly)

744:

Today the Tel Aviv-headquarted company is disclosing that it’s closed a $ 3 million Series A round from Blumberg Capital, Qualcomm Ventures (the chip maker’s venture arm), and Waze founder and existing Zeek investor Uri Levin. Originally launched in Israel before expanding to the U.K. in December

524:

While Zeek is clearly a made-in-Israel app – it could have evolved only in a country where refunds are not a matter of course – the app is useful abroad as well. Zeek has tens of thousands of users in Israel, as well as in Europe and the US, where it is used to buy and sell gift certificates. The

3553:

I don't mind you finding folks to improve this article (although it kind of looks like canvassing), but it is clear to me that you're not really considering the reasons behind the delete positions. I can see this because you're not effectively responding to any of the concerns that are based in

3541:

and worth preserving. I did seek help in improving the article and I see nothing wrong with that. Editors seek help every single day in Knowledge (XXG) and as a community, we should strive to help one another as much as possible under the proper guidelines. I can't apologize for doing by best to

3220:

So company-provided figures are okay for large companies, but figures provided by secondary sources for smaller companies are no good? You allude above that company-provided figures are problematic, yet also appear to state just above that it's also okay, depending on the size of the company. No

520:

The Zeek app, available for Android and iOS, allows users to scan a copy of their credit and upload details to Zeek’s cloud. Users name their asking price. Zeek categorizes and tags the credit by store, product, style, gender and age appropriateness, and any other criteria users potential buyers

3182:

The number of users demonstrates the company's impact and provides a claim of significance, and has been reported in reliable sources. I'll throw in an oherstuffexists argument here: if figures pertaining to user information is going to be omitted from Knowledge (XXG), then we better delete the

2028:

There is no encyclopedic value to this article as it stands and sources presented do not amount to encyclopedia notability. Accepting such promotional articles is not in the best interest of the project, IMO, as it would also mean that volunteer editors would waste their time trying to maintain

2565:

Yes, there are from my quotes above, showing the specific examples where the majority of one of the articles simply contained the man saying his own words itself, that was not journalism if the "news" article kept going back to the man himself, instead of the journalist actually making her own

2453:

places what. Now, as for the others, not only are they also beginning with such puffery company-supplied information, the worst cases are, one, the fact the company is not mentioned until the sixth thin paragraph, it also then simply focuses with other events, the actual information about this

2138:

If anyone is repeating their concerns, it's to emphasize what and why they are. No one is making any other statements than that, so as for the deleted contents, this is because it went to such overspecifics about the company and its services, it's clear it only came from one place: the company

856:

Zeek, an Israeli app company for unwanted store credit, lets you sell store credit (those receipts you get when you return an item that usually ends up getting washed in the laundry), gift cards and e-vouchers below face value. Zeek recently announced that it has raised $ 3 million in Series A

1480:

I'd like to see more recent and harder (like from long-established newspapers) sources that show the company has had some staying power before voting to keep. That doesn't include articles about the seeking of funding. Also, I'd like to note that we're supposed to judge the notability of the

1124:

as the Delete votes here are firm with stating what the exact concerns are and why we should delete this (the one Keep vote above me is simply restating what the user said above but not actually giving their own thoughts; I'll note that every single source offered above is PR, in that it only

1396:

the company supplying its own information "coated" as news? Are seriously suggesting that such a broad media coverage is all supplied by the company? I find that to be exaggerated since these are not one or two individual sources but instead a wide range of different media sources from three

2832:

for more information. Also, per the above, it's unclear who the "concerned advocate" would be here; who would this be, the nominator advocating for deletion, another user advocating for deletion, one of whom has provided two gigantic walls of text, or one of the users who have advocated for

3095:- Be aware that the history shows these supposed changes were actually simply to add specifications about the company's gift cards operations which of course is PR and this has been noted above with my analysis, the other ones are simply mere simple changes about it, particularly see also 3012:

articles are evidence that the company and its product do generate real interest in worldwide media, and has nothing to do with fundraising or PR. Please note that at this point the reason the article is incomplete in due to over moderation from editors seeking to delete the article.

1387:"The awards listed are not significant, and Red Herring is pay-per-play"?- The awards the company has won are legit. You can basically argue that every award could potentially be fixed by payment. Are you suggesting that all 100 finalists on Red Herring have paid for their placement? 1677:

Available for Apple and Android devices, the free Zeek app aims to match people with unwanted gift cards with people who would be shopping in that particular store anyway. Zeek estimates that 47% of Brits are given an unwanted gift card each year – half of which never get redeemed.

1400:"Zeek’s business model is still not entirely clear- That article is from early 2014 when the company just started. This is evidence of neutral media coverage. Media coverage of the Zeek dated back almost three years which confirms my claim that these are a lot more than PR articles. 3309:

because nobody has effectively countered SwisterTwister's deep analysis of the sources, except to suggest that we can trust that journalism occurred in "reliable sources" even with no examples of such given. Simply saying "but it was covered by {laundry list}!" doesn't suffice --

3159:

encyclopedic content. The uncritical inclusion of 80,000 and 100,000 "users" is not in the best interest of the encyclopedia. This could only have come from the company, and is not independently verifiable since the company is private. With such editing, Knowledge (XXG) becomes a

3583:

Allow me to answer your concerns, I think we should examine the current state of the article independent of the article's history. In regards to the article sources; I'd like to point out that we should try to review the information itself, not how it is presented. In regards to

517:

sellers, and barterers of store credits to find each other, no matter where they are. According to Zeek CEO Daniel Zelkind, retailers are cleaning up on this system, to the detriment of consumers. As much as NIS 600 million ($ 175 million) in store credits go unused every year.

1695:

Guardian Money took a look at the site and was slightly underwhelmed – many vouchers were being sold with just a 2% or 3% discount, making it hardly worth the hassle. However, voucher discounts may become much more attractive after Christmas as more of them appear on the

2995:- At his point, it looks like weak attempts are made from editors still asking for the deletion of the article. The fact that you are claiming that all major reporting done on the company is just PR is just astonishing. Moreover, I'd like to address the following quote: 1716:

I don't agree with any of your assertions of sourcing, based on your putting forward bad sources previously; please don't try to put words into my mouth. Also, please learn to use wiki formatting, instead of messed-up HTML that appears cut-and-pasted from elsewhere -

471:

Zeek’s business model is still not entirely clear, and the two founders are in talks on the matter with the retail chains, but they emphasize that no matter what, for users, the buyers and sellers, there will be no charge for use of the app or transaction fees of any

781:

The company’s app and marketplace lets you trade unwanted store credit, including gift vouchers, credit notes, gift cards and e-vouchers. The seller gets to offload credit that is of no use or before it expires, and the buyer gets to purchase credit at a significant

639:

If you thought gift cards didn’t have traction, think again. Israel-based Zeek announced a $ 9.5 million Series B funding round led by Scale-Up Venture Capital on Wednesday. That financing includes contributions from major players like Blumberg Capital and Qualcomm

3851:

I find the responses to my request above to be unsubstantial. Continuing with the crutch of a multiplicity of sources, and simply the opinion that the sources check out as significant non-promo coverage, isn't enough to counter SwisterTwister's analysis. Also,

1434:

claim that all sources are not reliable as well as the claim that all media sources here are basically Sock Puppets at the hands of the company is far from accurate. Given more time I could improve the article. There are sufficient sources in order to so.

1034:

to be uncritically republishing corporate statements put through the filter of newspapers and online sources. Media sources are at the bottom ladder as far as RS are concerns. In this particular case, these are secondary sources, but I would not call them

3221:

offense is intended here, and I appreciate your points, (e.g. Facebook is much larger and under more scrutiny) but Knowledge (XXG) articles are based upon what reliable sources state, whereas primary sources should be used sparingly and with discretion.

1393:"*Later that year the company won Appcircus's Connect & Enrich App Challenge award"- What's wrong with this sentence? It is what the original article reports. The company won the award plain and simple. Is that not notable? Why is this advertisement? 2919:

Re. "mentioning those 2 new links are not acceptable...." I am allowed to have an opinion. I have one, and I shared it, and it is what it is. You may not agree with or like my opinion, but I have a right to have one. Please don't try to intimidate or

1731:

All of that is advertising and that alone, because the "articles" explicitly and largely state exactly what the company wants to say about itself, not what an encyclopedia says; all of that actually goes to excessive specifics about its services.

1409:"In turn, Zeek takes a commission on each transaction. It’s a model identical to extremely well-funded U.S. startup Raise, which closed a $ 56 million round of Series B funding early last year, putting Zeek’s bank balance into sharp contrast": 1390:"The rest is about investments"- If theses investments about the company have gained such significant coverage than I would say that it is notable in the eyes of the media. These are not PR articles but actual reporting on the start-up company. 3616:- While I can understand the concerns raised about the promotional language of some of the sources, I 'd like to point out that currently there are 16 different sources stated in the article. Some sources openly criticize the company's product 3801:, (warning, totally off-topic!) wow! is this some sort of record, an article of around 300 words (excluding references) generating an afd of about 12,000 words, does wiki have an article on "List of really, really, really, really long afds"? 1582:

argument above is pretty compelling to me, which is why I ask for what I asked for. I think it's going to have to come from another editor for me even to take a look at it. If nothing like I've requested is supplied, consider my !vote a

602:

Zeek is a mobile app and website that allows users to buy gift cards and vouchers from their favorite brands at a discount and sell unwanted gift vouchers for cash, providing a solution to the estimated $ 100 billion of unused gift cards

1415:

The media coverage goes well beyond the ones referenced in the article. For example this article about 10 promising start-ups. Is this article considered as pure PR? Did all 10 company paid for article placement? I still struggle with

2608:

to interpret our RS rules such that things that are clearly barely-processed press releases would be treated as A+ first-class carefully-verified information you can absolutely rely upon, that does not mean that doing so is somehow a

785:

In turn, Zeek takes a commission on each transaction. It’s a model identical to extremely well-funded U.S. startup Raise, which closed a $ 56 million round of Series B funding early last year, putting Zeek’s bank balance into sharp

3639:- This is probably the weakest argument of all. Perhaps could be true if the article was published in early 2015. At this point the company has a clear business model with and has made a notable impact in worldwide mainstream media 3353:

these concerns clear, not because it's "convincing", other comments have stated these same concerns, so it's not a matter of "affected analysis or statements" at all. The Delete votes have still continued in noting the concerns.

2736:

Thanks for doing your part to quell freedom of speech on Knowledge (XXG). My comment is pure and only positive in intention. Also, my comment was geared toward K.e.coffman; perhaps allow the user time to respond before scolding

2762:. I've seen this done at least twice by the same editor, and I would echo DG's suggestion to please avoid this practice. On the substance of NA's comment, I've expressed here and in other AfDs that promotional articles on 1618:"compounding that is the lack of wiki formatting ability"- This should not be the issue here. Please focus on the subject at hand. If you feel you can improve the article formatting than by all means please do so. 475:

The company is beginning with a pilot in Israel, with hopes of entering additional markets, such as Asia, Latin America, and Europe, in the future. The US is irrelevant, because store credit is very rarely used

609:

Zeek was founded in 2014 by CEO Daniel Zelkind, VP Marketing Itay Erel and CTO Ziv Isaiah and has 35 employees in Israel and London. The company has raised $ 12.5 million to date including the latest financing

482:

The first investor in the company was Uri Levine, former president and co-founder of traffic app Waze , who today is chairman and co-founder of financial fees comparison site Feex. He is also an angel investor.

338:- note that the article used to be much longer, but it was all unsourced, so I cut it to RSes a few hours ago. This appears to have originally been created as a puffery-filled promotional piece (see also the 3787:: At this point, it seems the account does more harm than good for this discussion. The weak keep argument made by this user seems like an attempt to harm the article's credibility more than anything else. 3769:

This is the height of misusing sources to create Knowledge (XXG) entry. Merely citing sources does not make anything notable. And the above case of using fake accounts to Keep vote is highly questionable.

521:

would search for. Buyers pay no commission, and depending on store policies, sellers can often sell different chunks of their credit to different customers, allowing them to maximize their sale coverage.

353:. There may be articles actually about the company that don't originate with the company and aren't about funding rounds and ownership which I've missed, of course. Be careful not to confuse coverage of 289: 2178:

a company supported by sources such as The Guardian, CNBC, Globes, TechCrunch, Jewish Business News and The Jerusalem Post not clearly deserve a place on wikipedia? This is an open and shut KEEP case.

1559:

right there on the page. That you link to a blog page and claim it's an RS severely lowers my opinion of your skill in assessing sources, and leads me to distrust your assertions on source quality -

1053:

It is good journalistic practice to seek information from the article's subject. That these journalists from reputable news organizations follow this practice does not render the sources unreliable.

345:, which was part of the same cluster). I can see sources in GNews, but they're all funding rounds and ownership (which the article already covers) and promotional churnalism about what the company 3484:

Yes I am concerned by the heavy persistence of somehow attempting to think not acknowledging the actual concerns listed, by thinking others will say differently, is not actually what will happen.

2829: 2543:

are publishing content that is "entirely still PR" from Zeek. I cannot agree that these reputable sources "have financial gains and interests in the company itself". Do you have evidence for this

3570:

don't apply. If you found any non-promo language (true journalism) in any reliable source and presented it, while also demonostrating that such is significant coverage, it will be considered.

3338:

restating the same repepetive content is by no means any sort of deep analysis. There is no need to counter SwisterTwister's "deep analysis" of the sources because it is simply not convincing.

1634:

buy vouchers at a discounted rate. Eral founded the business in 2013 along with Daniel Zelkind and Ziv Isaiah from a headquarters in Tel Aviv. Zeek raised $ 3m (£2.07m) in funding in 2015.

1017:

Reselling would presumably put a dent in what Zeek‘s press release says is a staggering $ 100 billion in unused gift cards (directly stating that the numbers come from Zeek's press release)

1685:

Co-founder of Zeek Daniel Zelkind says: “The app solves a problem we’ve all experienced. We’re allowing people to earn real money for something that would go unused or ultimately expire.”

1011:

Zeek has tens of thousands of users in Israel, as well as in Europe and the US (potentially unverifiable claims by the company, as the firm is private and does not release revenue numbers)

1637:

Zelkind told The Guardian last year: “The app solves a problem we have all experienced. We are allowing people to earn real money for something that would go unused or ultimately expire.”

565:

The app then lets willing buyers pick up the gift card at the discounted value – Zeek reckons it sees an average 20 per cent skimmed off – and find it in their postbox shortly thereafter.

1238: 789:

With that said, in a statement Alex Lazovsky, General Partner of Scale-Up VC, is talking up Zeek’s unicorn potential, although I tellingly failed to get the startup’s current valuation.

242: 88: 1005:

Zeek’s business model is still not entirely clear, and the two founders are in talks on the matter with the retail chains ... (comes from the company about the state of the "talks")

1977: 1277: 3690:

for their edits. There is a possibility that this is an undisclosed paid editor/canvassed editor/sockpuppet who is probably voting on multiple AfDs to hide the actual target. --

1647: 1578:

Agreed with David Gerard, and compounding that is the lack of wiki formatting ability (see above), plus the idea that inclusion in a list is meaningful for our purposes. The

741:

use or before it expires, and the buyer gets to purchase credit at a significant discount. Meanwhile, Zeeks take a commission on each transaction. Win-win-win, you might say.

3686:

Please note that the above contributor has recently created an account, rapidly made 10 edits and then started !voting on multiple AfDs, many of which don't make sense. See

3380:

analysis. If you cannot counter the arguments made, you have no case for keeping, unless you can find other reliable sources demonstrating significant, non-promo coverage.

2264: 2110:

that are unacceptable, therefore since I have firmly and clearly stated such contents were PR" Which contents exactly are you referring to? Or is it your subjective opinion.

1537:

of the subject". There are sources in at least 4 languages about the company, and the claim that all news about the company is due to VC-backed funding is just not realistic

3148:

December 2015 it had over 100,000 users. Zeek's profits are realized via commissions that are charged to sellers for each transaction. In July 2016, Zeek had 35 employees.

2013:, which is a policy, not a guideline. The rest of the article is not much better. There are no indications of notability or significance, and the article also attempts to 575: 2315: 2298: 1014:

Zeek looks to combat this age-old frustration by setting up a digital marketplace where unloved gift cards can be bought and sold with ease. (more of company aspirations)

437: 339: 2281: 1406:

Reporting about different awards the company won seems neutral news reporting as done the original article. If that is advertisement I'll remove it from the article.

3099:

the long history of concerns with this article and the noticeable actions of this only existing for PR and that alone. At the time of AfD starting, the article was

1674:

Consumers given unwanted gift cards and vouchers as Christmas presents may want to try a new app which promises to sell them on for close to their original value.

3187:

article right away, because it contains content about users, including numbers of users! Furthermore, in the Facebook lead, the number of users is verified using

532: 2118:. Why was it deleted in the claim that is was content provided by the company? How is this content promotional? it seems like an attempt to sabotage the article. 489: 1210:

and launched their #ZEEKFACE campaign, which ran until January 2016. In July 2016 the company manged to secure a $ 9.5 Million succesful round B funding led by

399:

insufficient coverage in reliable sources to where there is no possible content that would substantiate to justify an article. Notability is not established. —

283: 2801:

I would ask that you come up with as clear a "keep" or "delete" as you can, and not be distracted by the chaff thrown up by a remarkably concerned advocate -

2820:

restrictions would over-simplify closure options on Knowledge (XXG), essentially making discussion closures into a "yes" or "no" default, which is akin to a

2350:

that have been published in independent, reliable sources. Also, the article has been heavily copy edited after being nominated for deletion (see the page's

1067:

I believe the above statement confuses investigative journalism with the practice of redressing press releases and / or taking briefings set up by PR firms.

1378:

Deep coverage provides an organization with a level of attention that extends well beyond routine announcements and makes it possible to write more than a

682: 617: 490:"Stuck with a store credit? Zeek helps you get rid of it. A new app helps Israelis reclaim hundreds of millions of shekels lost annually to unused credits" 2759: 2675:. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out 650:

Zeek was founded in 2014 by CEO Daniel Zelkind, Itay Erel and Ziv Isaiah. Zeek will direct a chunk of the new round toward expansion in the UK market.

1783:. These long-established newspapers are evidence of the notability of the subject. The claim that all of that is pure advertising is just absorbed.- 1522: 866: 429: 3732:; this is a brand new account and already voting at AfDs. How would an editor with a 2-day old account know what "salt" is in deletion discussions? 1306: 3537:

are trusted sources. In regards to the claims made by opposing editors regarding COI. I'm not the creator of the article, but I do think it meets

1829: 2143:. My stated analyses and concerns are reaffirmed because, again, to state the above words, "they firmly and clearly state" the PR and concerns. 568:

Money goes direct to into the seller’s bank account or PayPal, and the buyer is now free to spend his or her new gift card as he or she pleases.

3314:

it's covered is critical. If it's covered in a passing or run-of-the-mill or PR-ish way, we cannot go by that, unless we wish to cheapen this

2758:-- yes, I also find the templated suggestions to not be appropriate in deletion discussions, as they do come across as condescending (pls see 2669: 2056:

that are unacceptable, therefore since I have firmly and clearly stated such contents were PR, there is absolutely no compromising with that.

2658:

Thank you for your suggestion. When you believe an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Knowledge (XXG) is a

2114:

money made from the transactions is kept in a separate collateral account until the payment can be sent" This is media coverage provided by

559:

Zeek looks to combat this age-old frustration by setting up a digital marketplace where unloved gift cards can be bought and sold with ease.

2082:- At this point at seems the editors above are just repeating their previous statements as they refuse to accept article sources. It seems 3554:

policies/guidelines. Repeating that {laundry list of sources} are trusted sources isn't a serious response. You need to make a case why

2694: 1985: 1285: 657: 97: 3283:- This certainly cannot be compared to Facebook, an established company compared to this one which is still needing money and investors. 1506:

The company was included in several different (beyond references in the original article) articles by main stream media sources such as

839: 249: 127: 3617: 3056: 1657: 562:

It’s simple really - Agatha’s ungrateful sod of a nephew uploads a picture of his gift card and sets a price, all via his smartphone.

17: 1155:; even the sources listed above state: "Zeek’s business model is still not entirely clear..." The second rationale for deletion is 857:

funding from Blumberg Capital and Qualcomm Inc. through its venture investment group, Qualcomm Ventures and Waze founder Uri Levin.

3729: 3687: 2872: 2604:, I have no problem calling that "promotional" and not considering it reliable sourcing to base an encyclopedia upon. While it's 1555:

The Forbes link is blatantly to one of their hosted blog pages, not to anything published under their editorial imprimatur. They

585: 1534: 878: 2686: 2676: 2414: 2388: 1168:

Later that year the company won Appcircus's Connect & Enrich App Challenge award. In 2015 the company was selected among,

1008:

The company is beginning with a pilot in Israel, with hopes of entering additional markets (discussion of company aspirations)

447: 1002:

Zeek said it will use this new funding to facilitate its expansion into Europe this year. (Comes from the company, obviously)

796: 752: 3247:"Appboy’s software processes approximately 2 billion messages per month between 420 million users.<ref name=fortune/: --> 2205:

clients and investors, not people completely uninvolved. When we become a PR webhost, we're damned as an ad-free and PR-💕.

113: 2938:

The sentence meant that the links were unacceptable themselves, I'll note I never mentioned anything else in that comment.

1320: 1239:"Felicidades a Swift File Transfer, Guudjob y zeek! Las mejores apps Android de la Connect & Enrich App Challenge 2014" 3427:. Many of these sources quote the organisations employees and use it as a story source which is explicitly not allowed by 1450: 412: 3542:

improve the article. I did not try to intimate Wiki editors like other editors that have participated in this discussion.

2825: 2234: 2139:

itself, since that's the person who would know the company's own services best....therefore republished advertising, aka

1610: 1530: 1097: 1023:

Today the Tel Aviv-headquarted company is disclosing that it’s closed a $ 3 million Series A round (routine funding news)

874: 2864: 2375: 542: 499: 3887: 2875:. These are three examples of bylined articles offering significant coverage in publications with editorial oversight. 40: 3081:– I have expanded the article. In the process, I have added several sources that are not included in my !vote above. 1100:

exceeds far beyond just trivial coverage. Moreover, the company has won The UK and Israel business, was selected for

2766:

subjects cannot be improved through copyediting alone. If all the fluff were to be removed, what would be left is a

1521:

There are enough notable mentions about the company from many different sources that pass as sufficient coverage in

715: 2639:

round...". Yes, the company's accomplishments have been to the point its ability to take money from investors. :-)

374:

Only sources are trivial coverage of the subject; no substantial reliable coverage appears to exist. Does not meet

304: 3027:

You mean, removing content and sources that aren't up to Knowledge (XXG) standards - I can't apologise for that -

2544: 964: 465:

is due to the fact that the retailers refuse to accept physical or digital copies of store credit, only originals.

86:

If you came here because someone asked you to, or you read a message on another website, please note that this is

3237:

authoritatively presented in Knowledge (XXG)'s voice. For example, please see this uncritical editing in action:

1807: 1688:

He says 94% of vouchers sell within 24 hours, with Amazon vouchers holding the record time of just five seconds.

690: 387: 271: 1854:-- at this point, the article establishes that it exists solely to promote the business. It should be delete as 159: 3718: 3497: 3366: 3296: 3125: 2951: 2905: 2583: 2483: 2218: 2156: 2069: 1745: 1605:

It is absoulotly true that "The Forbes link is blatantly to one of their hosted blog pages". That is why I did

1429: 1138: 215: 210: 2859:. An Israeli company is going to have different types of coverage than a US or UK company, but it still meets 1858:. Once Knowledge (XXG) starts accepting such promotional articles, it will lose its value as an encyclopedia. 1830:

http://www.forbes.com/sites/yoavvilner/2016/01/18/16-london-based-startups-ready-to-take-on-2016/#5ff8a3546973

1501:

Please tell me what you consider to be "lightweight promotional junk" and I'll remove it from the article ASAP

2566:

efforts, but that was clearly not the case since the man was advertising his own company, making the article

3813: 3191:

primary source! Well, at least in this Zeek article, secondary sources are used to verify this information!

1504:

To answer the claim:"I'd like to see more recent and harder (like from long-established newspapers) sources"

219: 3140:-- the article is still unconvincing, even with the recent changes. For example, it contains this material: 1526: 1481:

subject, not the presentation of the article's content -- any lightweight promotional junk can be removed.

1438: 870: 143: 117: 3835: 3695: 3471: 3436: 3032: 2983: 2806: 2727: 2631:

I would add that the language in this article is puffed up to the point of being comical: "...the company

2618: 2183: 1961: 1903: 1722: 1564: 1468: 1261: 1170: 1101: 362: 3538: 3399: 2856: 2821: 2767: 2336: 1379: 1105: 1020:

Zeek is on a mission to rescue $ 100 billion worth of unused gift cards (yet more of company aspirations)

350: 102: 3883: 3737: 3261: 3223: 3211: 3193: 3169: 3083: 2998:"Yes, the company's accomplishments have been to the point its ability to take money from investors. :-) 2929: 2880: 2835: 2775: 2744: 2699: 2644: 2356: 2320: 2303: 2286: 2269: 2034: 1867: 1367: 1072: 1044: 325: 202: 36: 3613: 3589: 3559: 3424: 2921: 1956: 1256: 265: 3664: 2099: 1776: 1759:

At this point, it is established that the company has sufficient coverage in trusted sources such as

686: 383: 3853: 3636: 3597: 3567: 3319: 2682: 2014: 1579: 1518:

article might be just a passing mention but it is further proff that the company is well establish.

1152: 1031: 342: 3775: 3706: 3485: 3354: 3284: 3113: 3057:

https://www.theguardian.com/money/2015/nov/14/overdraft-money-transfer-christmas-banks-credit-cards

2939: 2893: 2571: 2505: 2471: 2379: 2206: 2144: 2057: 1896: 1733: 1417: 1126: 925: 494: 297: 3626: 3593: 3563: 3428: 3233: 3203: 2860: 2423: 3809: 3250: 2549: 2539: 2103: 1912: 1780: 1054: 968: 959: 883: 834: 261: 149: 80: 3827: 1855: 1156: 667: 3868: 3861: 3839: 3831: 3817: 3792: 3779: 3757: 3750: 3741: 3723: 3699: 3691: 3668: 3646: 3578: 3571: 3547: 3502: 3475: 3467: 3440: 3432: 3411: 3407: 3388: 3381: 3371: 3347: 3343: 3330: 3323: 3301: 3265: 3227: 3215: 3197: 3173: 3130: 3087: 3036: 3028: 3022: 3018: 2987: 2979: 2956: 2933: 2910: 2884: 2839: 2810: 2802: 2779: 2748: 2731: 2723: 2703: 2690: 2648: 2622: 2614: 2588: 2557: 2488: 2360: 2324: 2307: 2290: 2273: 2255: 2223: 2187: 2179: 2161: 2130: 2126: 2074: 2038: 1871: 1788: 1750: 1726: 1718: 1710: 1706: 1595: 1588: 1568: 1560: 1548: 1544: 1489: 1482: 1472: 1464: 1454: 1446: 1371: 1143: 1116: 1112: 1076: 1062: 1048: 976: 912: 891: 778:

include a hiring drive as Zeek plans to increase headcount in order to accelerate that growth.

418: 406: 391: 366: 358: 329: 64: 29:

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.

3882:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

3620: 3609: 3585: 3555: 3420: 3155:

As SwisterTwister mentioned, this material belongs solely on the company's web site. This is

2021:). Do the readers need to know that the company secured funding "in order to further expend ( 379: 35:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's

3733: 3257: 3207: 3165: 2974:

literal press releases being used as sources. Just tagged another two. Are these really the

2925: 2876: 2771: 2715: 2640: 2553: 2030: 1863: 1363: 1211: 1192: 1068: 1058: 1040: 972: 887: 321: 311: 3656: 3377: 2852: 2738: 2402:"Zeek, a startup that lets you buy and sell unwanted gift vouchers, closes $ 9.5M Series B" 2010: 1859: 1362:

or routine announcements about funding rounds as would be expected of a VC-backed company.

1349:"Zeek, a startup that lets you buy and sell unwanted gift vouchers, closes $ 9.5M Series B" 753:"Zeek, a startup that lets you buy and sell unwanted gift vouchers, closes $ 9.5M Series B" 375: 3660: 3518: 2470:. Once we start compromising about accepting advertisements, we have become a PR webhost. 2427: 2401: 2174: 1642:

The company claims 30% of vouchers worldwide go unused amounting to £65bn being wasted."

860:

Zeek said it will use this new funding to facilitate its expansion into Europe this year.

1840: 745:

2014, the startup plans to use the new funding to “expedite” further European expansion.

618:"A gift card startup just raised $ 9.5 million to solve the unclaimed gift card problem" 3856:

isn't necessarily as time-restrictive as suggested -- it's about whether a subject has

3771: 2924:

me into feeling that I am not allowed to share a legitimate and reasoned opinion here.

2533: 2511: 2246: 1818: 1621: 1515: 1507: 953: 931: 800: 537: 55: 2722:

here on this page. This is not a helpful mode of discussion; please do not do this -

3202:

The comparison is not pertinent as Facebook is a billion dollar corporation which is

1630:

UK consumers are estimated to waste around £1bn in unused voucher credits each year.

909: 3788: 3642: 3543: 3526: 3403: 3339: 3014: 3009: 2978:

that any of the "keep" editors can find? If so, that condemns the article itself -

2868: 2347: 2343: 2122: 2115: 2083: 1784: 1760: 1702: 1652: 1540: 1463:

I am unconvinced by the stuff added to the article, and my delete opinion stands -

1442: 1348: 1307:"Blumberg Capital & Qualcomm Invest $ 3 Million in Israeli Startup Zeek Mobile" 1108: 1096:- I updated the article adding information which passes as"significant coverage in 804: 760: 400: 177: 165: 133: 3619:. That is while the article is heavily moderated i.e those sources do comply with 3067: 2708:

The best thing I can think of to fix it is to delete this worthless advertisement.

1334: 277: 236: 963:

have accepted "paid product placements" from Zeek. Do you have evidence for this

112:

However, you are invited to participate and your opinion is welcome. Remember to

3376:

There is absolutely a need to counter it, and how dare you talk down someone's

3161: 3108: 2601: 2567: 2528: 2467: 2405: 2140: 2095: 1892: 1808:

http://jewishbusinessnews.com/2016/07/06/top-10-israeli-undiscovered-startups/

1772: 948: 756: 719: 3633:

such as the company's business model, services rendered and current activity.

1178:

won The UK and Israel business award for most promising start up of the year.

3534: 206: 3206:

and a subject of great scrutiny. This is clearly not happening with Zeek.

1412:

The article mentions the company business model. How is this a RP article?

723: 3398:

Convincing arguments for deletion have been made; in particular it fails

3184: 2517: 1889: 1215: 1196: 937: 622: 3188: 2654: 3522: 2523: 1321:"Fintech Fundings: 25 Companies Raise $ 450 Million Week Ending May 22" 943: 829: 662: 3530: 2499: 2392: 2340: 2091: 1768: 1511: 919: 658:"TechNation: Zeek Raises $ 9.5 Million for Store-voucher Marketplace" 580: 442: 2970:

With all these weeks of discussion and work on the article, there's

1978:"Sajid Javid: "Israel has made business bloom in the barren desert"" 1682:

card and sent in the post by the seller within seven business days.

1648:"Overdraft or a 'money transfer'? How to ease the cost of Christmas" 1278:"Sajid Javid: "Israel has made business bloom in the barren desert"" 1203: 3241:. The editor had presented the number (that even the publication 981:

The language of the coverage has promotional undertones, such as:

3876:

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.

3630: 3005: 2830:

Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Administrator instructions

2662:, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the 2659: 2087: 2018: 1764: 1207: 198: 70: 2017:

notability from the company the founders previously worked at (

1609:. Thank you for agreeing that the other two references pass as 797:"Growing startup Zeek helps you sell those unwanted gift cards" 3448:

Check out some of these attempts to influence the discussion:

75: 2237:

to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

2497:

I cannot agree that any of the reputable news organizations

917:

I cannot agree that any of the reputable news organizations

354: 106:(agreement) is gauged based on the merits of the arguments, 1692:

in a separate collateral account before a payment is made.

3860:

proven itself notable. There's no timetable set for that.

3002:

The company's media coverage goes well beyond fundraising.

656:

Levy, Ruti; Appelberg, Shelly; Orpaz, Inbal (2016-07-28).

3245:) as info independently verified by RS, as they claimed: 2376:"Stuck with a store credit? Zeek helps you get rid of it" 96:

among Knowledge (XXG) contributors. Knowledge (XXG) has

3464: 3461: 3458: 3455: 3452: 3449: 3238: 3100: 3096: 2824:, particularly when users have divergent opinions. See 2613:, and I really don't see that we're obliged to do so - 2459: 2351: 1527:

Knowledge (XXG):Notability#General notability guideline

871:

Knowledge (XXG):Notability#General notability guideline

232: 228: 224: 2354:), and does not have a promotional tone at this time. 2173:

The article meets notability guidelines, and multiple

296: 1841:

https://www.marketingweek.com/disruptive-brands/zeek/

576:"Israeli gift card marketplace co Zeek raises $ 9.5m" 428:

per the significant coverage in multiple independent

3239:"according to the company" was conveniently left out 1819:

https://www.marketingweek.com/100-disruptive-brands/

533:"Zeek app lets you buy and sell unwanted gift cards" 3104: 2463: 2415:"Voucher Trading Startup Zeek Moves into UK Market" 2243:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 716:"Zeek Lets You Buy And Sell Unwanted Gift Vouchers" 310: 2826:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion process § Common outcomes 2025:) the company's market presence in the UK market"? 1335:"UK sees $ 1.4B in unused gift vouchers each year" 3423:and using these for notability is a violation of 320:Company is not notable. Fails CorpDepth and GNG. 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 3890:). No further edits should be made to this page. 3728:Comment: I would question the contribution from 2668:The Knowledge (XXG) community encourages you to 479:For the time being it only has a Hebrew website. 3068:http://video.cnbc.com/gallery/?video=3000469149 2389:"Zeek allows shoppers to trade credit vouchers" 830:"Tech Talk: Israel is a Kickstarter superpower" 822:gift card-specific marketplace to new horizons. 438:"Zeek allows shoppers to trade credit vouchers" 2265:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 1915:award for most promising start up of the year. 1191:In 2015 Zeek secured $ 3 million funding from 2316:list of Business-related deletion discussions 2299:list of Websites-related deletion discussions 126:Comments may be tagged as follows: suspected 8: 2314:Note: This debate has been included in the 2297:Note: This debate has been included in the 2280:Note: This debate has been included in the 2263:Note: This debate has been included in the 1039:for the purpose of establishing notability. 2760:Knowledge (XXG):Don't template the regulars 2282:list of Israel-related deletion discussions 3446:Note to closing admin: Canvassing concerns 2313: 2296: 2279: 2262: 2009:...this article is not in compliance with 1529:, which requires "significant coverage in 1436: 873:, which requires "significant coverage in 100:regarding the encyclopedia's content, and 3183:second two paragraphs in the lead of the 2106:no longer pass as significant coverage. " 2424:"Uncashed vouchers hold key for MBA app" 1202:In December 2015, they were featured on 1174:Europe: Top 100 Finalists. In June 2016 120:on this page by adding ~~~~ at the end. 3049: 2770:listing, which Knowledge (XXG) is not. 1930: 1800: 1230: 3517:can be said with great certainty that 3246: 1607:not include it in the original article 683:"Top 10 Israeli Undiscovered Startups" 3232:There's big difference between large 349:to do - lots of trivia, but not much 18:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion 7: 3826:This is precise what is explored in 3802: 1957:"2015 Red Herring Europe: Finalists" 1257:"2015 Red Herring Europe: Finalists" 2687:New contributors are always welcome 1104:100 finalists. This is evidence of 3318:. At best for this subject, it's 2600:When the RSes are clearly running 24: 2685:to try out your editing skills. 3803: 3730:Special:Contributions/Seanhaley1 3688:Special:Contributions/Seanhaley1 3677: 2653: 1309:. Blumberg Capital. 20 May 2015. 865:There is sufficient coverage in 79: 3256:(same diff as already linked). 1791:) 8:30, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 616:Reback, Gedalyah (2016-07-27). 2851:because article subject meets 2695:many reasons you might want to 2256:18:24, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 2224:23:41, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 2188:15:46, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 2162:23:44, 30 September 2016 (UTC) 2131:12:30, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 2075:04:20, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 2039:04:02, 29 September 2016 (UTC) 1976:Ruthven, Hunter (2005-11-05). 1872:05:35, 28 September 2016 (UTC) 1751:21:17, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1727:21:11, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1711:22:30, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1596:17:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1569:16:13, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1549:18:00, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1490:12:29, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1473:10:14, 27 September 2016 (UTC) 1455:06:43, 26 September 2016 (UTC) 1372:19:18, 25 September 2016 (UTC) 1276:Ruthven, Hunter (2005-11-05). 1144:19:09, 25 September 2016 (UTC) 1117:08:56, 25 September 2016 (UTC) 908:like paid product placements. 892:04:26, 25 September 2016 (UTC) 436:Goldenberg, Roy (2014-03-19). 419:17:16, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 392:14:12, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 367:11:19, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 330:10:43, 22 September 2016 (UTC) 1: 828:Shapira, Ariel (2015-05-27). 116:on the part of others and to 2456:who the investing people are 2029:neutrality of this article. 1888:: May 20, 2014, third place 1646:Jones, Rupert (2015-11-14). 751:O'Hear, Steve (2016-07-27). 714:O'Hear, Steve (2005-05-18). 689:. 2016-07-06. Archived from 488:Shamah, David (2014-08-21). 3869:13:19, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 3840:07:41, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 3818:01:44, 7 October 2016 (UTC) 3780:20:46, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 3758:16:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 3742:04:48, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 3724:04:36, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 3700:07:50, 6 October 2016 (UTC) 3669:23:35, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3579:15:01, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3503:05:49, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3476:05:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3441:05:41, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3412:19:41, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3389:15:07, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3372:19:21, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3348:21:28, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3331:12:06, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3302:01:31, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3266:01:45, 5 October 2016 (UTC) 3228:03:09, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3216:02:56, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 3198:23:59, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 3174:23:17, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 3131:22:24, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 3088:13:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 3037:11:48, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 3023:14:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2988:07:29, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2957:15:43, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2934:03:16, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2911:02:54, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2885:02:26, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2840:15:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2811:09:08, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2780:19:49, 4 October 2016 (UTC) 2749:14:56, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2732:14:30, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2704:14:23, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2649:09:18, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2623:09:09, 2 October 2016 (UTC) 2589:01:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2558:01:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 2489:03:41, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 2361:01:28, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 2325:00:58, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 2308:00:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 2291:00:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 2274:00:57, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 1907:Europe: Top 100 Finalists. 1380:very brief, incomplete stub 1351:. techcrunch. 27 July 2016. 1077:02:42, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 1063:02:30, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 1049:01:44, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 977:01:23, 3 October 2016 (UTC) 913:02:40, 1 October 2016 (UTC) 65:18:48, 8 October 2016 (UTC) 3909: 3705:because of PR webhosting. 3419:The sources are blatantly 3248:– this is verified by the 2635:to secure a $ 9.5 million 795:Chang, Lulu (2016-07-27). 531:Keach, Sean (2015-01-20). 3243:attributed to the company 2711:In addition, your use of 2689:. You don't even need to 1525:to allow Zeek to qualify 1337:. CNBC. 24 December 2015. 574:Rabi, Idan (2016-07-27). 3879:Please do not modify it. 3649:) 00:11, 7 October 2016 3550:) 15:48, 5 October 2016 2417:. Jewish Business Times. 1323:. Finovate. 21 May 2015. 750: 713: 32:Please do not modify it. 3795:) 00:12, 7 October 2016 2833:retention? Which user? 1159:, with content such as: 158:; accounts blocked for 128:single-purpose accounts 98:policies and guidelines 3514:Note to closing admin: 3466:. I see a COI here. -- 3000: 1880:With content such as: 1698: 1639: 1557:explicitly disclaim it 1384: 1382:about an organization. 1102:Red Herring (magazine) 869:to allow Zeek to pass 862: 824: 791: 747: 710: 652: 612: 570: 527: 484: 2996: 2438:Comment and analysis' 1672: 1628: 1376: 854: 819: 775: 738: 705: 637: 600: 557: 514: 462: 2799:To the closing admin 2693:(although there are 2399: 2100:Jewish Business News 1939:"TAU Innovation Day" 1777:Jewish Business News 1404:Regarding the awards 1397:different languages. 687:Jewish Business News 3684:Suspicious account: 2506:The Times of Israel 2380:The Times of Israel 1897:Tel Aviv University 1670:The article notes: 1030:Knowledge (XXG) is 926:The Times of Israel 901:Most of those look 852:The article notes: 817:The article notes: 773:The article notes: 736:The article notes: 703:The article notes: 635:The article notes: 598:The article notes: 555:The article notes: 512:The article notes: 495:The Times of Israel 460:The article notes: 110:by counting votes. 89:not a majority vote 3864:Stevie is the man! 3753:Stevie is the man! 3574:Stevie is the man! 3384:Stevie is the man! 3326:Stevie is the man! 2764:marginally notable 2678:how to edit a page 2540:The Jerusalem Post 2422:Moules, Jonathan. 2104:The Jerusalem Post 1913:UK Israel Business 1781:The Jerusalem Post 1626:The article notes: 1591:Stevie is the man! 1485:Stevie is the man! 960:The Jerusalem Post 835:The Jerusalem Post 3164:platform itself. 3093:Comment to closer 2673:in updating pages 2545:exceptional claim 2387:Goldenbery, Roy. 2327: 2310: 2293: 2276: 2258: 2254: 1457: 1441:comment added by 965:exceptional claim 191: 190: 187: 114:assume good faith 63: 3900: 3881: 3866: 3808: 3807: 3806: 3755: 3721: 3716: 3681: 3680: 3576: 3500: 3495: 3386: 3369: 3364: 3328: 3299: 3294: 3226: 3196: 3128: 3123: 3086: 3070: 3065: 3059: 3054: 2954: 2949: 2908: 2903: 2838: 2747: 2720: 2714: 2702: 2666:link at the top. 2657: 2586: 2581: 2486: 2481: 2447:the company says 2431: 2418: 2413:Tanenbaum, Gil. 2409: 2396: 2383: 2359: 2352:Revision history 2323: 2306: 2289: 2272: 2253: 2251: 2244: 2242: 2240: 2238: 2221: 2216: 2159: 2154: 2072: 2067: 1997: 1996: 1994: 1993: 1984:. Archived from 1973: 1967: 1966: 1953: 1947: 1946: 1935: 1843: 1838: 1832: 1827: 1821: 1816: 1810: 1805: 1748: 1743: 1668: 1666: 1665: 1656:. Archived from 1611:reliable sources 1593: 1531:reliable sources 1523:reliable sources 1487: 1432: 1427: 1353: 1352: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1331: 1325: 1324: 1317: 1311: 1310: 1303: 1297: 1296: 1294: 1293: 1284:. Archived from 1273: 1267: 1266: 1253: 1247: 1246: 1235: 1212:Blumberg Capital 1193:Blumberg Capital 1141: 1136: 1098:reliable sources 881:of the subject". 875:reliable sources 867:reliable sources 850: 848: 847: 838:. Archived from 815: 813: 812: 803:. Archived from 771: 769: 768: 759:. Archived from 734: 732: 731: 722:. Archived from 701: 699: 698: 678: 676: 675: 666:. Archived from 633: 631: 630: 596: 594: 593: 584:. Archived from 553: 551: 550: 541:. Archived from 510: 508: 507: 498:. Archived from 458: 456: 455: 446:. Archived from 430:reliable sources 415: 409: 403: 355:Zeek the journal 340:recently-deleted 315: 314: 300: 252: 240: 222: 185: 173: 157: 141: 122: 92:, but instead a 83: 76: 62: 60: 53: 34: 3908: 3907: 3903: 3902: 3901: 3899: 3898: 3897: 3896: 3888:deletion review 3877: 3862: 3804: 3751: 3719: 3707: 3678: 3572: 3519:Financial Times 3498: 3486: 3382: 3367: 3355: 3324: 3297: 3285: 3222: 3192: 3126: 3114: 3082: 3075: 3074: 3073: 3066: 3062: 3055: 3051: 2952: 2940: 2906: 2894: 2865:Times of Israel 2834: 2743: 2718: 2712: 2698: 2584: 2572: 2484: 2472: 2442:fifth paragraph 2434: 2428:Financial Times 2421: 2412: 2400:O'Hear, Steve. 2386: 2374:Shamah, David. 2373: 2355: 2319: 2302: 2285: 2268: 2259: 2247: 2245: 2233: 2231: 2219: 2207: 2201:want to say to 2157: 2145: 2070: 2058: 2002: 2001: 2000: 1991: 1989: 1975: 1974: 1970: 1955: 1954: 1950: 1937: 1936: 1932: 1895:Day Contest at 1848: 1847: 1846: 1839: 1835: 1828: 1824: 1817: 1813: 1806: 1802: 1746: 1734: 1663: 1661: 1645: 1589: 1483: 1430: 1418: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1347: 1346: 1342: 1333: 1332: 1328: 1319: 1318: 1314: 1305: 1304: 1300: 1291: 1289: 1275: 1274: 1270: 1255: 1254: 1250: 1237: 1236: 1232: 1139: 1127: 845: 843: 827: 810: 808: 794: 766: 764: 729: 727: 696: 694: 681: 673: 671: 655: 628: 626: 615: 591: 589: 573: 548: 546: 530: 505: 503: 487: 453: 451: 435: 413: 407: 401: 384:FuriouslySerene 257: 248: 213: 197: 175: 163: 147: 131: 118:sign your posts 74: 56: 54: 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3906: 3904: 3895: 3894: 3893: 3892: 3872: 3871: 3845: 3844: 3843: 3842: 3821: 3820: 3796: 3782: 3767:Delete per nom 3763: 3762: 3761: 3760: 3746: 3745: 3744: 3702: 3672: 3671: 3641: 3640: 3634: 3624: 3607: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3603: 3602: 3581: 3508: 3507: 3506: 3505: 3479: 3478: 3443: 3414: 3393: 3392: 3391: 3374: 3333: 3304: 3277: 3276: 3275: 3274: 3273: 3272: 3271: 3270: 3269: 3268: 3177: 3176: 3152: 3151: 3150: 3149: 3142: 3141: 3134: 3133: 3103:and it is now 3090: 3072: 3071: 3060: 3048: 3047: 3043: 3042: 3041: 3040: 3039: 2990: 2964: 2963: 2962: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2914: 2913: 2887: 2845: 2844: 2843: 2842: 2814: 2813: 2795: 2794: 2793: 2792: 2791: 2790: 2789: 2788: 2787: 2786: 2785: 2784: 2783: 2782: 2709: 2667: 2664:edit this page 2626: 2625: 2594: 2593: 2592: 2591: 2562: 2561: 2534:Digital Trends 2512:TrustedReviews 2492: 2491: 2433: 2432: 2419: 2410: 2397: 2384: 2365: 2364: 2363: 2329: 2328: 2311: 2294: 2277: 2241: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2191: 2190: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2164: 2120: 2119: 2111: 2077: 2046: 2045: 2044: 2043: 2042: 2041: 2026: 1999: 1998: 1968: 1948: 1929: 1928: 1924: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1920: 1919: 1918: 1917: 1916: 1909: 1900: 1875: 1874: 1845: 1844: 1833: 1822: 1811: 1799: 1798: 1794: 1793: 1792: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1753: 1700: 1699: 1640: 1622:Marketing week 1619: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1598: 1573: 1572: 1571: 1539: 1538: 1519: 1516:Marketing Week 1508:Marketing Week 1505: 1502: 1499: 1498: 1492: 1475: 1414: 1413: 1407: 1401: 1398: 1394: 1391: 1388: 1375: 1374: 1355: 1354: 1340: 1326: 1312: 1298: 1268: 1248: 1229: 1228: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1218: 1200: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1180: 1179: 1161: 1160: 1146: 1119: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1087: 1086: 1085: 1084: 1083: 1082: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1028: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1018: 1015: 1012: 1009: 1006: 1003: 989: 988: 987: 986: 985: 984: 983: 982: 954:Digital Trends 932:TrustedReviews 896: 895: 864: 863: 825: 801:Digital Trends 792: 748: 711: 679: 653: 644:2005 and 2011. 613: 571: 538:TrustedReviews 528: 485: 422: 421: 394: 369: 343:Daniel Zelkind 336:Delete per nom 318: 317: 254: 193: 189: 188: 84: 73: 68: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3905: 3891: 3889: 3885: 3880: 3874: 3873: 3870: 3867: 3865: 3859: 3855: 3850: 3847: 3846: 3841: 3837: 3833: 3829: 3825: 3824: 3823: 3822: 3819: 3815: 3811: 3810:Coolabahapple 3800: 3797: 3794: 3790: 3786: 3783: 3781: 3777: 3773: 3768: 3765: 3764: 3759: 3756: 3754: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3727: 3726: 3725: 3722: 3717: 3714: 3710: 3703: 3701: 3697: 3693: 3689: 3685: 3676: 3675: 3674: 3673: 3670: 3666: 3662: 3658: 3654: 3651: 3650: 3648: 3644: 3638: 3635: 3632: 3628: 3625: 3622: 3618: 3615: 3611: 3608: 3601: 3599: 3595: 3591: 3587: 3582: 3580: 3577: 3575: 3569: 3565: 3561: 3557: 3552: 3551: 3549: 3545: 3540: 3536: 3532: 3528: 3524: 3520: 3515: 3512: 3511: 3510: 3509: 3504: 3501: 3496: 3493: 3489: 3483: 3482: 3481: 3480: 3477: 3473: 3469: 3465: 3462: 3459: 3456: 3453: 3450: 3447: 3444: 3442: 3438: 3434: 3430: 3426: 3422: 3418: 3415: 3413: 3409: 3405: 3401: 3397: 3394: 3390: 3387: 3385: 3379: 3375: 3373: 3370: 3365: 3362: 3358: 3351: 3350: 3349: 3345: 3341: 3337: 3334: 3332: 3329: 3327: 3321: 3317: 3313: 3308: 3305: 3303: 3300: 3295: 3292: 3288: 3282: 3279: 3278: 3267: 3263: 3259: 3255: 3253: 3252: 3244: 3240: 3235: 3231: 3230: 3229: 3225: 3224:North America 3219: 3218: 3217: 3213: 3209: 3205: 3201: 3200: 3199: 3195: 3194:North America 3190: 3186: 3181: 3180: 3179: 3178: 3175: 3171: 3167: 3163: 3158: 3154: 3153: 3146: 3145: 3144: 3143: 3139: 3136: 3135: 3132: 3129: 3124: 3121: 3117: 3110: 3106: 3102: 3098: 3094: 3091: 3089: 3085: 3084:North America 3080: 3077: 3076: 3069: 3064: 3061: 3058: 3053: 3050: 3046: 3038: 3034: 3030: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3020: 3016: 3011: 3007: 3003: 2999: 2994: 2991: 2989: 2985: 2981: 2977: 2973: 2969: 2966: 2965: 2958: 2955: 2950: 2947: 2943: 2937: 2936: 2935: 2931: 2927: 2923: 2918: 2917: 2916: 2915: 2912: 2909: 2904: 2901: 2897: 2891: 2888: 2886: 2882: 2878: 2874: 2870: 2866: 2862: 2858: 2854: 2850: 2847: 2846: 2841: 2837: 2836:North America 2831: 2827: 2823: 2818: 2817: 2816: 2815: 2812: 2808: 2804: 2800: 2797: 2796: 2781: 2777: 2773: 2769: 2765: 2761: 2757: 2754: 2753: 2752: 2751: 2750: 2746: 2745:North America 2740: 2735: 2734: 2733: 2729: 2725: 2717: 2710: 2707: 2706: 2705: 2701: 2700:North America 2696: 2692: 2688: 2684: 2681:, or use the 2680: 2679: 2674: 2672: 2665: 2661: 2656: 2652: 2651: 2650: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2629: 2628: 2627: 2624: 2620: 2616: 2612: 2607: 2603: 2599: 2596: 2595: 2590: 2587: 2582: 2579: 2575: 2569: 2564: 2563: 2560: 2559: 2555: 2551: 2546: 2542: 2541: 2536: 2535: 2530: 2526: 2525: 2520: 2519: 2514: 2513: 2508: 2507: 2502: 2501: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2493: 2490: 2487: 2482: 2479: 2475: 2469: 2465: 2461: 2457: 2452: 2448: 2443: 2439: 2436: 2435: 2429: 2425: 2420: 2416: 2411: 2407: 2403: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2385: 2381: 2377: 2372: 2371: 2370: 2369: 2362: 2358: 2357:North America 2353: 2349: 2348:staff writers 2345: 2344:news articles 2342: 2338: 2334: 2331: 2330: 2326: 2322: 2321:North America 2317: 2312: 2309: 2305: 2304:North America 2300: 2295: 2292: 2288: 2287:North America 2283: 2278: 2275: 2271: 2270:North America 2266: 2261: 2260: 2257: 2252: 2250: 2239: 2236: 2225: 2222: 2217: 2214: 2210: 2204: 2200: 2195: 2194: 2193: 2192: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2176: 2172: 2169: 2168: 2163: 2160: 2155: 2152: 2148: 2142: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2128: 2124: 2117: 2112: 2109: 2105: 2101: 2097: 2093: 2089: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2073: 2068: 2065: 2061: 2055: 2051: 2048: 2047: 2040: 2036: 2032: 2027: 2024: 2020: 2016: 2012: 2008: 2007: 2006: 2005: 2004: 2003: 1988:on 2016-02-09 1987: 1983: 1982:Real Business 1979: 1972: 1969: 1964: 1963: 1958: 1952: 1949: 1944: 1940: 1934: 1931: 1927: 1914: 1910: 1908: 1905: 1901: 1898: 1894: 1891: 1887: 1884: 1883: 1882: 1881: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1865: 1861: 1857: 1853: 1850: 1849: 1842: 1837: 1834: 1831: 1826: 1823: 1820: 1815: 1812: 1809: 1804: 1801: 1797: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1757: 1752: 1749: 1744: 1741: 1737: 1730: 1729: 1728: 1724: 1720: 1715: 1714: 1713: 1712: 1708: 1704: 1697: 1693: 1689: 1686: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1660:on 2016-05-01 1659: 1655: 1654: 1649: 1644: 1643: 1638: 1635: 1631: 1627: 1623: 1620: 1617: 1612: 1608: 1604: 1603: 1602: 1601:Clarification 1599: 1597: 1594: 1592: 1586: 1581: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1566: 1562: 1558: 1554: 1553: 1552: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1542: 1536: 1532: 1528: 1524: 1520: 1517: 1513: 1509: 1503: 1500: 1497: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1479: 1476: 1474: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1459: 1458: 1456: 1452: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1433: 1428: 1425: 1421: 1411: 1410: 1408: 1405: 1402: 1399: 1395: 1392: 1389: 1386: 1385: 1383: 1381: 1373: 1369: 1365: 1360: 1359: 1350: 1344: 1341: 1336: 1330: 1327: 1322: 1316: 1313: 1308: 1302: 1299: 1288:on 2016-02-09 1287: 1283: 1282:Real Business 1279: 1272: 1269: 1264: 1263: 1258: 1252: 1249: 1245:(in Spanish). 1244: 1240: 1234: 1231: 1227: 1217: 1213: 1209: 1205: 1201: 1198: 1194: 1190: 1189: 1188: 1187: 1186: 1185: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1158: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1123: 1120: 1118: 1114: 1110: 1107: 1103: 1099: 1095: 1092: 1091: 1078: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1065: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1033: 1029: 1022: 1019: 1016: 1013: 1010: 1007: 1004: 1001: 1000: 999: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 993: 992: 991: 990: 980: 979: 978: 974: 970: 966: 962: 961: 956: 955: 950: 946: 945: 940: 939: 934: 933: 928: 927: 922: 921: 916: 915: 914: 911: 907: 904: 900: 899: 898: 897: 894: 893: 889: 885: 880: 876: 872: 868: 861: 858: 853: 842:on 2016-09-25 841: 837: 836: 831: 826: 823: 818: 807:on 2016-09-25 806: 802: 798: 793: 790: 787: 783: 779: 774: 763:on 2016-09-25 762: 758: 754: 749: 746: 742: 737: 726:on 2016-09-25 725: 721: 717: 712: 709: 704: 693:on 2016-09-25 692: 688: 684: 680: 670:on 2016-09-25 669: 665: 664: 659: 654: 651: 648: 645: 641: 636: 625: 624: 619: 614: 611: 607: 604: 599: 588:on 2016-09-25 587: 583: 582: 577: 572: 569: 566: 563: 560: 556: 545:on 2016-09-25 544: 540: 539: 534: 529: 526: 522: 518: 513: 502:on 2016-09-25 501: 497: 496: 491: 486: 483: 480: 477: 473: 469: 466: 461: 450:on 2016-09-25 449: 445: 444: 439: 434: 433: 431: 427: 424: 423: 420: 416: 410: 404: 398: 395: 393: 389: 385: 381: 377: 373: 370: 368: 364: 360: 356: 352: 348: 344: 341: 337: 334: 333: 332: 331: 327: 323: 313: 309: 306: 303: 299: 295: 291: 288: 285: 282: 279: 276: 273: 270: 267: 263: 260: 259:Find sources: 255: 251: 247: 244: 238: 234: 230: 226: 221: 217: 212: 208: 204: 200: 196: 195: 194: 183: 179: 171: 167: 161: 155: 151: 145: 139: 135: 129: 125: 121: 119: 115: 109: 105: 104: 99: 95: 91: 90: 85: 82: 78: 77: 72: 69: 67: 66: 61: 59: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 3878: 3875: 3863: 3857: 3848: 3832:Lemongirl942 3798: 3784: 3766: 3752: 3712: 3708: 3692:Lemongirl942 3683: 3652: 3573: 3539:WP:CORPDEPTH 3527:The Guardian 3513: 3491: 3487: 3468:Lemongirl942 3445: 3433:Lemongirl942 3416: 3400:WP:CORPDEPTH 3395: 3383: 3360: 3356: 3335: 3325: 3316:encyclopedia 3315: 3311: 3306: 3290: 3286: 3280: 3249: 3242: 3156: 3137: 3119: 3115: 3092: 3078: 3063: 3052: 3044: 3029:David Gerard 3010:The Guardian 3001: 2997: 2992: 2980:David Gerard 2975: 2971: 2967: 2945: 2941: 2899: 2895: 2889: 2857:WP:WORLDVIEW 2848: 2822:WP:SUPERVOTE 2803:David Gerard 2798: 2768:WP:DIRECTORY 2763: 2755: 2724:David Gerard 2677: 2670: 2663: 2636: 2632: 2615:David Gerard 2610: 2605: 2597: 2577: 2573: 2548: 2538: 2532: 2522: 2516: 2510: 2504: 2498: 2477: 2473: 2455: 2450: 2446: 2441: 2437: 2367: 2366: 2337:WP:CORPDEPTH 2332: 2248: 2232: 2212: 2208: 2202: 2198: 2180:Newtonslaw40 2170: 2150: 2146: 2121: 2116:The Guardian 2107: 2084:The Guardian 2079: 2063: 2059: 2053: 2049: 2022: 1990:. Retrieved 1986:the original 1981: 1971: 1960: 1951: 1945:(in Hebrew). 1943:Telecom News 1942: 1933: 1925: 1906: 1885: 1862:also apply. 1851: 1836: 1825: 1814: 1803: 1795: 1761:The Guardian 1739: 1735: 1719:David Gerard 1701: 1694: 1690: 1687: 1684: 1680: 1676: 1673: 1669: 1662:. Retrieved 1658:the original 1653:The Guardian 1651: 1641: 1636: 1632: 1629: 1625: 1606: 1600: 1590: 1584: 1575: 1561:David Gerard 1556: 1494: 1484: 1477: 1465:David Gerard 1460: 1437:— Preceding 1423: 1419: 1403: 1377: 1343: 1329: 1315: 1301: 1290:. Retrieved 1286:the original 1281: 1271: 1260: 1251: 1242: 1233: 1225: 1175: 1169: 1148: 1132: 1128: 1121: 1106:WP:CORPDEPTH 1093: 1036: 958: 952: 942: 936: 930: 924: 918: 905: 902: 882: 859: 855: 851: 844:. Retrieved 840:the original 833: 820: 816: 809:. Retrieved 805:the original 788: 784: 780: 776: 772: 765:. Retrieved 761:the original 743: 739: 735: 728:. Retrieved 724:the original 706: 702: 695:. Retrieved 691:the original 672:. Retrieved 668:the original 661: 649: 646: 642: 638: 634: 627:. Retrieved 621: 608: 605: 601: 597: 590:. Retrieved 586:the original 579: 567: 564: 561: 558: 554: 547:. Retrieved 543:the original 536: 523: 519: 515: 511: 504:. Retrieved 500:the original 493: 481: 478: 474: 470: 467: 463: 459: 452:. Retrieved 448:the original 441: 425: 396: 371: 359:David Gerard 351:WP:CORPDEPTH 346: 335: 319: 307: 301: 293: 286: 280: 274: 268: 258: 245: 192: 181: 169: 160:sockpuppetry 153: 142:; suspected 137: 123: 111: 107: 101: 93: 87: 57: 50:no consensus 49: 47: 31: 28: 3734:K.e.coffman 3614:WP:NOTPROMO 3590:WP:NOTPROMO 3560:WP:NOTPROMO 3425:WP:NOTPROMO 3258:K.e.coffman 3208:K.e.coffman 3166:K.e.coffman 3097:which shows 2926:Safehaven86 2877:Safehaven86 2772:K.e.coffman 2641:K.e.coffman 2518:he:Geektime 2346:written by 2031:K.e.coffman 1962:Red Herring 1904:Red Herring 1864:K.e.coffman 1587:(for now). 1535:independent 1364:K.e.coffman 1262:Red Herring 1171:Red Herring 1069:K.e.coffman 1041:K.e.coffman 938:he:Geektime 879:independent 623:he:Geektime 322:Philafrenzy 284:free images 3854:WP:TOOSOON 3661:seanhaley1 3655:It passes 3637:WP:TOOSOON 3598:WP:TOOSOON 3568:WP:TOOSOON 3378:good faith 3320:WP:TOOSOON 3162:churnalism 3109:churnalism 3045:References 2869:TechCrunch 2855:, and per 2739:good faith 2637:successful 2602:churnalism 2568:churnalism 2529:TechCrunch 2468:churnalism 2406:TechCrunch 2368:References 2249:Sandstein 2141:churnalism 2096:TechCrunch 2015:WP:INHERIT 1992:2015-06-10 1926:References 1893:Innovation 1796:References 1773:TechCrunch 1664:2016-09-27 1580:WP:TOOSOON 1292:2015-06-10 1226:References 1153:WP:TOOSOON 1032:WP:NOTNEWS 949:TechCrunch 846:2016-09-25 811:2016-09-25 767:2016-09-25 757:TechCrunch 730:2016-09-25 720:TechCrunch 697:2016-09-25 674:2016-09-25 629:2016-09-25 592:2016-09-25 549:2016-09-25 506:2016-09-25 454:2016-09-25 94:discussion 58:Sandstein 3884:talk page 3772:Light2021 3627:WP:ORGIND 3594:WP:ORGIND 3564:WP:ORGIND 3535:CNN Money 3429:WP:ORGIND 3254:article." 3234:WP:LISTED 3204:WP:LISTED 2863:based on 2861:WP:SIGCOV 2742:worries. 2611:good idea 1911:June 2016 1533:that are 1243:AppCircus 877:that are 786:contrast. 782:discount. 640:Ventures. 603:globally. 150:canvassed 144:canvassed 103:consensus 37:talk page 3886:or in a 3828:WP:BOGOF 3185:Facebook 2922:bludgeon 2890:Commment 2606:possible 2335:– Meets 2235:Relisted 2108:contents 2054:contents 1890:Tel Aviv 1856:WP:PROMO 1451:contribs 1439:unsigned 1216:Qualcomm 1197:Qualcomm 1157:WP:PROMO 1037:reliable 414:contribs 243:View log 182:username 176:{{subst: 170:username 164:{{subst: 154:username 148:{{subst: 138:username 132:{{subst: 39:or in a 3849:Comment 3799:Comment 3789:Ymd2004 3785:Comment 3643:Ymd2004 3621:WP:SPIP 3610:WP:SPIP 3586:WP:SPIP 3556:WP:SPIP 3544:Ymd2004 3523:Haaretz 3421:WP:SPIP 3404:Edwardx 3340:Ymd2004 3336:Comment 3281:Comment 3251:Fortune 3138:Comment 3079:Comment 3015:Ymd2004 2993:Comment 2968:Comment 2756:Comment 2716:sofixit 2683:sandbox 2671:be bold 2633:managed 2598:Comment 2524:Haaretz 2341:bylined 2123:Ymd2004 2080:Comment 2050:Comment 1852:Comment 1785:Ymd2004 1703:Ymd2004 1696:market. 1576:Comment 1541:Ymd2004 1495:Comment 1478:Comment 1461:Comment 1443:Ymd2004 1109:Ymd2004 944:Haaretz 708:zeek.me 663:Haaretz 402:Mythdon 380:WP:CORP 347:aspires 290:WP refs 278:scholar 216:protect 211:history 146:users: 3715:wister 3711:wister 3657:WP:GNG 3612:& 3533:, and 3531:Globes 3494:wister 3490:wister 3417:Delete 3396:Delete 3363:wister 3359:wister 3307:Delete 3293:wister 3289:wister 3122:wister 3118:wister 2948:wister 2944:wister 2902:wister 2898:wister 2873:Globes 2871:, and 2853:WP:GNG 2691:log in 2580:wister 2576:wister 2550:Cunard 2537:, and 2500:Globes 2480:wister 2476:wister 2393:Globes 2215:wister 2211:wister 2153:wister 2149:wister 2092:Globes 2066:wister 2062:wister 2011:WP:NOT 1886:Awards 1860:WP:ENN 1769:Globes 1742:wister 1738:wister 1585:Delete 1514:. The 1512:Forbes 1426:wister 1422:wister 1149:Delete 1135:wister 1131:wister 1122:Delete 1055:Cunard 969:Cunard 957:, and 920:Globes 906:really 903:really 884:Cunard 610:round. 581:Globes 476:there. 443:Globes 397:Delete 376:WP:GNG 372:Delete 262:Google 220:delete 3004:Both 2972:still 2849:Keep: 2697:). . 2203:their 2175:WP:RS 1902:2015 472:sort. 305:JSTOR 266:books 250:Stats 237:views 229:watch 225:links 124:Note: 16:< 3836:talk 3830:. -- 3814:talk 3793:talk 3776:talk 3738:talk 3720:talk 3696:talk 3665:talk 3659:. – 3653:Keep 3647:talk 3631:Zeek 3596:and 3566:and 3548:talk 3499:talk 3472:talk 3437:talk 3408:talk 3368:talk 3344:talk 3298:talk 3262:talk 3212:talk 3189:this 3170:talk 3127:talk 3105:this 3101:this 3033:talk 3019:talk 3008:and 3006:CNBC 2984:talk 2976:best 2953:talk 2930:talk 2907:talk 2881:talk 2828:and 2807:talk 2776:talk 2728:talk 2660:wiki 2645:talk 2619:talk 2585:talk 2554:talk 2485:talk 2464:this 2462:and 2460:this 2333:Keep 2220:talk 2199:they 2184:talk 2171:Keep 2158:talk 2127:talk 2102:and 2088:CNBC 2071:talk 2035:talk 2019:Waze 1868:talk 1789:talk 1779:and 1765:CNBC 1747:talk 1723:talk 1707:talk 1565:talk 1545:talk 1510:and 1469:talk 1447:talk 1431:talk 1368:talk 1214:and 1208:CNBC 1206:and 1195:and 1176:Zeek 1151:per 1140:talk 1113:talk 1094:Keep 1073:talk 1059:talk 1045:talk 973:talk 910:Zero 888:talk 426:Keep 408:talk 388:talk 363:talk 357:. - 326:talk 298:FENS 272:news 233:logs 207:talk 203:edit 199:Zeek 71:Zeek 3858:yet 3312:how 3157:not 2451:who 2023:sic 1204:Sky 647:... 606:... 468:... 378:or 312:TWL 241:– ( 178:csp 174:or 166:csm 134:spa 108:not 3838:) 3816:) 3778:) 3740:) 3698:) 3682:— 3667:) 3592:, 3588:, 3562:, 3558:, 3529:, 3525:, 3521:, 3474:) 3463:, 3460:, 3457:, 3454:, 3451:, 3439:) 3410:) 3402:. 3346:) 3322:. 3264:) 3214:) 3172:) 3035:) 3021:) 2986:) 2932:) 2883:) 2867:, 2809:) 2778:) 2730:) 2719:}} 2713:{{ 2647:) 2621:) 2556:) 2531:, 2527:, 2521:, 2515:, 2509:, 2503:, 2426:. 2404:. 2391:. 2378:. 2318:. 2301:. 2284:. 2267:. 2186:) 2129:) 2098:, 2094:, 2090:, 2086:, 2037:) 1980:. 1959:. 1941:. 1870:) 1775:, 1771:, 1767:, 1763:, 1725:) 1709:) 1650:. 1567:) 1547:) 1471:) 1453:) 1449:• 1370:) 1280:. 1259:. 1241:. 1115:) 1075:) 1061:) 1047:) 975:) 967:? 951:, 947:, 941:, 935:, 929:, 923:, 890:) 832:. 799:. 755:. 718:. 685:. 660:. 620:. 578:. 535:. 492:. 440:. 417:) 411:• 390:) 382:. 365:) 328:) 292:) 235:| 231:| 227:| 223:| 218:| 214:| 209:| 205:| 184:}} 172:}} 162:: 156:}} 140:}} 130:: 3834:( 3812:( 3791:( 3774:( 3736:( 3713:T 3709:S 3694:( 3663:( 3645:( 3623:. 3600:: 3546:( 3492:T 3488:S 3470:( 3435:( 3406:( 3361:T 3357:S 3342:( 3291:T 3287:S 3260:( 3210:( 3168:( 3120:T 3116:S 3031:( 3017:( 2982:( 2946:T 2942:S 2928:( 2900:T 2896:S 2879:( 2805:( 2774:( 2726:( 2643:( 2617:( 2578:T 2574:S 2552:( 2547:? 2478:T 2474:S 2430:. 2408:. 2395:. 2382:. 2213:T 2209:S 2182:( 2151:T 2147:S 2125:( 2064:T 2060:S 2033:( 1995:. 1965:. 1899:. 1866:( 1787:( 1740:T 1736:S 1721:( 1705:( 1667:. 1624:: 1613:. 1563:( 1543:( 1467:( 1445:( 1424:T 1420:S 1366:( 1295:. 1265:. 1199:. 1133:T 1129:S 1111:( 1071:( 1057:( 1043:( 971:( 886:( 849:. 814:. 770:. 733:. 700:. 677:. 632:. 595:. 552:. 509:. 457:. 432:. 405:( 386:( 361:( 324:( 316:) 308:· 302:· 294:· 287:· 281:· 275:· 269:· 264:( 256:( 253:) 246:· 239:) 201:( 186:. 180:| 168:| 152:| 136:|

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Articles for deletion/Zeek - Knowledge (XXG)

Index