Knowledge

:Articles for deletion/Zymo Research - Knowledge

Source 📝

403:- in my opinion, there's very little in the Washington Post reference. The two short paragraphs amounts to 4 sentences. The first sentence talks about how Zymo, along with the other companies in this article, has developed a home testing kit. The second sentence describes the contents of the kit. The next paragraph, sentence three, is a statement from Marc Van Eden, VP of Business Development at Zymo, where he says that Zymo passes the samples to a lab for processing. The final sentence is Marc saying that the lab can process the samples in 24 hours but they're waiting for FDA approval. 431:. The criteria for establishing notability for companies/organizations as per WP:NCORP is for multiple sources (at least two) of significant coverage with in-depth information *on the company* and (this bit is important!) containing "Independent Content". Also, "Independent content", in order to count towards establishing notability, must include original and independent opinion, analysis, investigation, and fact checking that are clearly attributable to a source unaffiliated to the subject. The references fail NCORP, topic fails GNG/ 369:
The reference you added was (17 March 2020). "DIY nasal swabs, drive-thrus and labs in overdrive: Americans are desperate for more coronavirus testing". The Washington Post. Retrieved 29 March 2020. This would appear to be a general article , with Zymo included as one of the many companies trying
348:
I added a Washington Post article that included two paragraphs on Zymo for recent coronavirus-related news. I might suggest seeing whether any related coverage comes out regarding that sort of thing, though I would certainly say delete in 6-12 months if nothing arrives. I also searched through a
235: 370:
to develop at-home COVID testing. How much of the full article is about them? Iwould assume that if this becomes practical, it wil for other firms also, and the non-PR coverage will mention all of them.
326: 229: 307: 188: 135: 120: 195: 83: 161: 156: 165: 115: 108: 17: 148: 250: 217: 129: 125: 450: 485: 40: 211: 78: 468: 441: 395: 381: 358: 337: 318: 298: 277: 207: 90: 481: 152: 36: 257: 61: 424: 266:
no evidence of notability. The first three references are PR, the 4th is from the company itself.
243: 144: 96: 73: 464: 292: 53: 330: 311: 104: 29:
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below.
480:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
35:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's
428: 420: 223: 432: 391: 354: 386:
Yeah, there are two short paragraphs (in a fairly long article) about Zymo specifically.
57: 460: 436: 377: 273: 182: 387: 350: 400: 372: 349:
number of local newspapers in Orange County, but almost nothing came up.
268: 476:
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate.
453:
to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
56:, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired 286: 178: 174: 170: 66: 242: 459:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 43:). No further edits should be made to this page. 488:). No further edits should be made to this page. 325:Note: This discussion has been included in the 306:Note: This discussion has been included in the 327:list of California-related deletion discussions 308:list of Companies-related deletion discussions 256: 8: 136:Help, my article got nominated for deletion! 324: 305: 287:version of article nominated for deletion 7: 425:in-depth information on the company 24: 121:Introduction to deletion process 67:request the article's undeletion 18:Knowledge:Articles for deletion 1: 111:(AfD)? Read these primers! 505: 419:I am unable to locate any 359:18:30, 29 March 2020 (UTC) 338:09:25, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 319:09:24, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 278:06:00, 26 March 2020 (UTC) 91:01:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC) 469:15:39, 3 April 2020 (UTC) 442:14:27, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 396:16:44, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 382:15:54, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 299:02:37, 5 April 2020 (UTC) 478:Please do not modify it. 32:Please do not modify it. 109:Articles for deletion 54:minimal participation 421:significant coverage 429:independent content 471: 340: 321: 296: 289:--User:Ceyockey ( 126:Guide to deletion 116:How to contribute 496: 458: 456: 454: 335: 316: 290: 261: 260: 246: 198: 186: 168: 106: 86: 81: 76: 69: 34: 504: 503: 499: 498: 497: 495: 494: 493: 492: 486:deletion review 472: 449: 447: 427:and containing 331: 312: 203: 194: 159: 143: 140: 103: 100: 84: 79: 74: 65: 64:). Editors can 62:"soft deletion" 48:The result was 41:deletion review 30: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 502: 500: 491: 490: 457: 446: 445: 444: 413: 412: 411: 410: 409: 408: 407: 406: 405: 404: 362: 361: 342: 341: 322: 302: 301: 264: 263: 200: 139: 138: 133: 123: 118: 101: 99: 94: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 501: 489: 487: 483: 479: 474: 473: 470: 466: 462: 455: 452: 443: 440: 439: 434: 430: 426: 422: 418: 415: 414: 402: 399: 398: 397: 393: 389: 385: 384: 383: 379: 375: 374: 368: 367: 366: 365: 364: 363: 360: 356: 352: 347: 344: 343: 339: 336: 334: 328: 323: 320: 317: 315: 309: 304: 303: 300: 295: 294: 288: 285: 282: 281: 280: 279: 275: 271: 270: 259: 255: 252: 249: 245: 241: 237: 234: 231: 228: 225: 222: 219: 216: 213: 209: 206: 205:Find sources: 201: 197: 193: 190: 184: 180: 176: 172: 167: 163: 158: 154: 150: 146: 145:Zymo Research 142: 141: 137: 134: 131: 127: 124: 122: 119: 117: 114: 113: 112: 110: 105: 98: 97:Zymo Research 95: 93: 92: 89: 88: 87: 82: 77: 68: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 38: 33: 27: 26: 19: 477: 475: 448: 437: 416: 371: 345: 333:CAPTAIN RAJU 332: 314:CAPTAIN RAJU 313: 291: 283: 267: 265: 253: 247: 239: 232: 226: 220: 214: 204: 191: 102: 75:bibliomaniac 72: 71: 49: 47: 31: 28: 230:free images 52:. Based on 50:soft delete 293:talk to me 482:talk page 37:talk page 484:or in a 461:MelanieN 451:Relisted 438:HighKing 433:WP:NCORP 189:View log 130:glossary 60:(a.k.a. 39:or in a 236:WP refs 224:scholar 162:protect 157:history 107:New to 417:Delete 208:Google 166:delete 423:with 388:Jlevi 378:talk 351:Jlevi 274:talk 251:JSTOR 212:books 196:Stats 183:views 175:watch 171:links 16:< 465:talk 392:talk 355:talk 346:Wait 284:Note 244:FENS 218:news 179:logs 153:talk 149:edit 58:PROD 401:DGG 373:DGG 269:DGG 258:TWL 187:– ( 467:) 435:. 394:) 380:) 357:) 329:. 310:. 297:) 276:) 238:) 181:| 177:| 173:| 169:| 164:| 160:| 155:| 151:| 70:. 463:( 390:( 376:( 353:( 272:( 262:) 254:· 248:· 240:· 233:· 227:· 221:· 215:· 210:( 202:( 199:) 192:· 185:) 147:( 132:) 128:( 85:5 80:1

Index

Knowledge:Articles for deletion
talk page
deletion review
minimal participation
PROD
"soft deletion"
request the article's undeletion
bibliomaniac
1
5
01:19, 13 April 2020 (UTC)
Zymo Research

Articles for deletion
How to contribute
Introduction to deletion process
Guide to deletion
glossary
Help, my article got nominated for deletion!
Zymo Research
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
View log

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.