Knowledge (XXG):Cherrypicking

559:

especially true of scholarship. For example, for a peer-reviewed publication, a scholarly mathematician should know the consensus of mathematical knowledge on a topic or should not publish at all on that topic. However, Knowledge (XXG) has no such requirement for its editors. An editor who knows just one fact and just one source about it is allowed to add the fact and the source to Knowledge (XXG), as long as all policies and guidelines are satisfied, and other editors can separately add more facts and sources from their knowledge. We strive to reach the state where the article as a whole is not the result of cherrypicking of some sources from many sources; for example, neutrality or due weight may require it, but an individual editor is not required to be neutral, only the article is, and an article's neutrality and balancing of weight are often achieved by adding content, without necessarily deleting other content. Our concern against cherrypicking when editing a Knowledge (XXG) article is generally against cherrypicking specifically from within a single source.

440:, database copies, and library hard copies of a newspaper are limited to one edition per day, and that is not necessarily the last edition. Some newspapers that maintain their own websites may choose to put the latest version on the website, and sometimes corrections are even added days or weeks later, but that is not guaranteed. Databases may or may not be updated to match newspapers' own websites, since database publishers are often separate from newspaper publishers, even if they are connected by contract. In any case, we use what is available, and, if we have a choice, we should use the best available, and we cite what we use. 420:

corrected between printings even if they're of the same edition. Unfortunately, library catalogues often do not indicate what printing is in a library, differentiating only between editions. It is possible that, for current editions of modern books, libraries tend to buy first printings whereas bookstores may stock more recent printings, although you may have to visit in person to find out. Printings are often marked in a modern book on the copyright page but only in a code, such as a line that says only "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10" or perhaps "10 9 8 7 6 5 4", in which the smallest number visible is often the printing number.

475:

and not to add Washington's. However, if another editor adds Washington's view, you may not delete it on the grounds that you disagree. No matter how sure you are that Washington is wrong to the bone, leave the content and the citation in place. What you may do is add a source that disputes Washington's view. This is consistent with Knowledge (XXG) being a work continually undergoing improvement and no editor is required to know or believe every source. Thus, to choose one source and not another is not cherrypicking from one source.

134: 661:, article), I argue now that doubtless someone besides Keynes said it and, given the content and if said by enough people, doubtless a scholar said it and it's useful and harmless to include it here (in a non-article) with the qualification, rather than write it in my own words and less wittily, somewhat as if I invented the notion. If an attribution to a presumably now-anonymous scholar can be provided, it'll be good to add it. 453:

ethology is reliable, that author's view has changed and the later view is authoritative, regardless of which edition was first or third. However, if a distinction can be found between two views about one subject, both would be authoritative for that author and we would not report a change. If the distinction is minor, the earlier view may not be entitled to weight in Knowledge (XXG).

390:

past. While an individual editor is not required to know all of the significant sources on a subject, it is helpful if you do, or if you know at least some of them. Therefore, if you are familiar with a different and unused source that should be used, feel free to edit an article consistently with the different source, if the source is otherwise eligible to be used in Knowledge (XXG).

516:

it from the same sourcing that you believe was cherrypicked by another editor, you should be able to find evidence of cherrypicking. Speculation is not an acceptable ground for continuing to challenge content as cherrypicked. In general, the better course is to find any contradictory or significant qualifying information yourself and to edit the page to reflect what you have found.

229:

cherrypicking words with the effect of changing the meaning of what the source is saying. It is cherrypicking even if the source is precisely cited. It is still cherrypicking even if the editor meant well in changing the meaning; the issue is not the editor's intention, but how the Knowledge (XXG) article represents the source's meaning.

281:

work has not less than the highest quality, but neither artist knows about the other, so neither one is criticizing the other. In effect, the book is a source that contains multiple sources, which you can treat separately. If you're editing an article about artist B but not about artist A, you don't have to report what artist A said.

42: 538:

denied that superiority. This can happen because a publisher wants a catchier title in order to encourage more sales, and some publishing contracts take control of the titles away from the authors. We do not ordinarily report a fact on the basis of a book title alone, but in a case like this we would be especially unlikely to do so.

119: 377:

source has several volumes, consider all the volumes. That kind of source may have relevant content sprinkled across all the volumes. You may have to read all of them. For some, searching the index (even reading the whole index from A to Z) is needed. For some, you'll need to search online inside a source for various terms.

574:

is 'selecting relevant information and not selecting irrelevant information'. We're supposed to do that when writing for Knowledge (XXG). For example, if you're writing an article about one person and basing it on a source about that person's family, you generally should select only information about

162:

often means selecting from the general range of sources on a topic so as to misrepresent a consensus or to misrepresent what has been published. For that, the remedy is to edit to reflect what another editor missed, because we don't expect an editor to know all the sources on a topic or even all of a

524:

Contradiction may justify deleting contradicted information more weakly sourced, but often it justifies presenting both sides of a topic, as by leaving intact the original statement and adding a new statement, so readers can know multiple perspectives. Which course to follow depends on the case, but

474:

Suppose Smith wrote a book with one view and Washington wrote another book with a contradictory view. Suppose you agree with Smith but not with Washington. Provided they came from different sources, e.g. different books or different websites, when you edit an article, you're free to add Smith's view

410:

It may be appropriate to cite an older edition even when a newer edition is also being cited, or instead of a newer edition, but this would be rare. The older information would have to be entitled to weight apart from the newer. One case is when writing about the historical development of an idea or

406:

Citing multiple editions in one article is permissible if the content is sourced to multiple editions. A statement being kept and which is supported by an older edition should continue to be supported by the older edition in a citation, unless an editor has found that the newer edition also supports

402:

If an editor finds that a later edition contradicts or qualifies an earlier edition that was cited in Knowledge (XXG), the editor who found it should treat the newer edition as if it is a separate source and edit the Knowledge (XXG) article, perhaps replacing or editing old content and old citations

398:

A later edition of a work usually replaces all earlier editions. Earlier editions are usually not authoritative as sourcing against later editions. However, an editor may not know of a newer edition or may not have access to it. Therefore, it generally is not cherrypicking to get information from an

293:

Some subjects are grounded in critique of society or of another subject. For instance, a belief system may contradict another. Given that a Knowledge (XXG) article is about only one subject, not every contradiction from outside of that subject need be reported, but substantial contradiction probably

249:

Earlier and later within a single source is generally not earlier or later in time. Exceptions may occur if a single source presents chronologically ordered material, such as an anthology of dated writings, a history, or a biography. However, even if an author is known to complete the writing of one

241:

Politics is a field in which changing one's mind is commonly criticized, at least in the United States. A claim is that a lack of consistency over time may make a candidate less trustworthy. However, while that may be more relevant to electing one or another candidate, it is less relevant to editing

515:

to persist in claiming that cherrypicking occurred unless evidence of it has been uncovered. You may know a subject very well and believe an article to be erroneous, but either you know it from other sourcing (but a conflict between multiple sources is not evidence of cherrypicking) or, if you know

431:

Newspapers traditionally have idiosyncratic ways of labeling different editions in the course of a day, especially in past decades, so that the labels may not make clear which is earlier or later, especially to an out-of-town reader. Additionally, the publisher may arbitrarily designate one edition

367:

On the other hand, merely additional information does not have to be provided. For example, if a source says "brain surgery is difficult" and goes on to state the experience of a surgeon who performed it without changing the meaning of the main information, the surgeon's experience does not have to

358:

Either contradictory or qualifying information may be found anywhere in a source, not necessarily adjacent to the main information. For example, while the main information may be in a middle chapter of a book, contradictory or qualifying information may be in an endnote, in an introduction, or on a

346:

Qualifying information is information that might not contradict the main information but that alters how the main information should be understood. For example, to quote a source that says that most Americans sleep late and skip work but to ignore that the source limits that by saying "on weekends"

237:

Timing matters. A statement at a given point in time may contradict any statement that was made earlier in time. However, a statement that is earlier in time does not contradict a later statement, even by the same person. Anyone is permitted to change their views. Generally, it does not discredit a

152:

If you are familiar with multiple credible sources on a subject and they are significantly different from each other, you may realize that Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines support reporting from some or all of the sources, and you should edit accordingly. If one editor is not familiar with

558:

has a wider meaning that is not entirely useful for the editing of Knowledge (XXG). In those outside media, authors may be expected to have sufficient knowledge of a subject to refrain from misrepresenting the state of knowledge by cherrypicking sources from all the sources on the subject. This is

537:

A book's title appears to be a statement of fact but the author, inside the book or elsewhere, denies what the title says is correct as a statement of fact. This did happen with one book, the title of which placed one class of people as superior to another class, whereas inside the book the author

493:

A consensus in a field or discipline is not usually the responsibility of one author, even if the author is an especially influential leader. A change in that consensus, such as on whether light needs ether as a medium for travel, is reportable in Knowledge (XXG) when sourcing reflecting consensus

419:

Printings and impressions may be treated like editions for these editorial purposes. Although in the U.S. different printings of one edition tend to be identical or very similar, generally there is no law requiring that and they may differ in any way a publisher wishes. For instance, errors may be

389:

However, an article as a whole should reflect the range of sources available on the article's subject. This does not require using every source that exists, just that the sourcing cited be reasonably representative of the range of sources that exist. This applies regardless of who edited it in the

376:

While Knowledge (XXG) may consider a "source" to be just p.32 of a certain book, to prevent cherrypicking you should consider a source in its larger sense. While many sources are organized for speedy lookups, some are not or your interest may not allow looking in just one place. For instance, if a

324:

Different fields of study have points of disagreement with each other. Even if the same author writes on multiple fields or disciplines in a single source, a Knowledge (XXG) article within one field of scholarship generally does not have to report contradictions emanating solely from other fields,

284:

This can be a difficult concept to apply with integrity and consistency. It is easier if a book is an anthology, but it can be true of many other books as well. For example, it is common for journalists to interview multiple sources for one book; and many studies and surveys in the social sciences

280:

Suppose one book has several in-depth profiles of different artists. According to the book, artist A says it's necessary to schedule four hours a day to paint in order to produce masterpieces but artist B says one should never schedule time for painting but should instead await inspiration, so the

533:

A book says that according to one religion only persons A, B, and C are prophets but according to another religion only persons D, E, and F are prophets. Although that is contradictory, in an article about both religions both statements should be reported, perhaps in the form of a fully disclosed

332:

Linguists tend not to rank cultures as dominant versus subcultural or as developed versus underdeveloped while sociologists tend to do exactly that, not because one is ignorantly insensitive and the other is cruelly chauvinist but because linguists need to learn the languages and ranking does not

529:

An author says something is true and a year later retracts the statement. Usually, report only the later statement or nothing at all. The exception would be if the earlier statement remains especially notorious after the retraction and must be discussed even though it was retracted, but that is

462:

Editors should not be considered like authors, even if an editor's name is more prominent than that of any author. Generally, what is published is the view or intellectual responsibility of an author and may or may not be that of an editor. An editor may even approve the publication of directly

385:

When editing Knowledge (XXG), it's not cherrypicking in general to miss contradictory or qualifying information from a different source than a source that had information already being used, because we don't expect editors to be familiar with all of the possible sources that could be cited on a

250:

chapter before beginning research for the next, do not assume that earlier or later in a source equates with earlier or later in time unless the source's content makes that chronological ordering clear. Even in sources that appear to rely on chronology, be careful about literary devices such as

452:

do not matter because any later work that contradicts or qualifies any earlier work replaces the earlier work as authority. For example, if an author wrote in 1993 in the third edition of a Paris travel guide that ethology is wholly nonsense but in 2002 in the first edition of a cookbook that

228:

As to contradictory information that needs to be reported in Knowledge (XXG), if, for example, a source says "Charlie loves all blue coats and hates all red coats", to report in Knowledge (XXG) that according to that source "Charlie loves all... coats" is cherrypicking from the source. It is

3128: 212:

Not all information must be presented. A source must be fairly represented for the purpose of the article and that includes contradictory and qualifying information, but, other than that, information need not be added if (for example) it is not due the weight or is redundant.

1168: 604: 2329: 411:

of an author's views. Another case is when two editions of the same work are actually about different subjects; an example is with some popular guides to computer software, where an older edition of a book may be about an older version of the same software.

510:

It is legitimate to ask on a page's talk page once about whether cherrypicking occurred in a specific case. If your question is based on speculation, that is where you may speculate, and even then only if reasonable. Beyond that, however, it is against

336:

A scientist may be expected to start with a hypothesis and challenge it with a scientific investigation to ensure thoroughness while a lawyer or detective may be expected to start with no hypothesis and find what a forensic investigation yields free of

149:, in a negative sense, means selecting information without including contradictory or significant qualifying information from the same source and consequently misrepresenting what the source says. This applies both to quotations and to paraphrasings. 1733: 1198: 3015: 238:

person that they reject older views, or probably most research scientists would have no credibility. One scholar reputedly said, when challenged about changing his mind, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

2464: 2895: 2067: 2424: 386:

topic. Therefore, to have gotten information from one source without acknowledging that it was contradicted or qualified in another source is not a valid criticism of an editor's work in Knowledge (XXG) as cherrypicking.

2233: 1828: 3268: 1535: 3208: 2955: 407:

the statement, in which case updating the citation to reflect the newer edition is helpful, or that the newer edition contradicts the statement, in which case the statement and the citation should both be updated.

2576: 1213: 3278: 3020: 880: 3544: 3539: 2830: 347:

is to omit qualifying information and misrepresent the source on Americans' work customs. While qualifying information is infinite and cannot all be quoted or paraphrased, if it is significant, include it.

3333: 1633: 749:

Reportedly, the old consensus was affirmative; Einstein disagreed; and some scientists questioned or denied Einstein's view for a few decades. Einstein's view survived as the new consensus of the field.

3318: 3068: 1608: 3656: 333:

provide much help to that end while sociologists specifically study relationships between peoples and thus study rankings without necessarily agreeing with those rankings in their own value systems.

1663: 1360: 3338: 2745: 1931: 1385: 1308: 890: 1510: 940: 930: 478:

If Smith's and Washington's views are in the same source, you must report both views, and not only the one you agree with. They're in the same source and you may not cherrypick from a source.

350:

This example of qualifying information is from a book: "I have taken artistic license in conveying both reality and essence" and "ome conversations... are not intended... as verbatim quotes."

2785: 2765: 1728: 1698: 184:(policy): Neutral point of view, by selectively presenting one point of view from available reliable sources that actually support two or more points of view that may conflict with each other 1010: 607:(using these sources is not cherrypicking in the negative sense discussed in this essay but some editorial decisions in creating these sources may be akin to cherrypicking by other people) 2022: 1748: 1025: 965: 1098: 3483: 1430: 2790: 459:

Anthologies should be considered as collections in which each contribution has its own authorship, whether that results in all the contributions having the same or different authors.

2870: 2825: 2735: 2685: 1951: 1678: 1653: 242:

an article. We may report that a candidate held one view at one time and another view at another time, sourcing each view, or report only one view if that is all that is entitled to

3592: 3378: 1668: 1303: 1288: 1000: 153:

some sources, another editor who is can edit accordingly. Irrespective of one editor's views, an article as a whole needs to conform to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

2705: 1268: 163:

consensus. Our concern within Knowledge (XXG) is about cherrypicking from within a source or closely-related multiple sources, and an editor should be careful in handling that.

534:

disagreement. The reason is that the book is itself relying on two other sources, each of which may be authoritative for its own subject but not for the other source's subject.

3646: 2860: 2775: 1891: 1743: 1648: 1263: 1223: 1078: 3651: 3488: 2581: 2494: 2092: 1833: 1658: 1583: 1318: 1293: 1218: 830: 789: 2469: 2414: 2399: 2915: 2865: 2720: 2012: 1350: 1233: 1113: 2152: 1530: 3448: 2077: 1823: 1560: 1485: 1055: 2132: 246:

in the article, but generally the view that came later in time is not contradicted by the view that came earlier in time for purposes of reporting in Knowledge (XXG).

3343: 2995: 2840: 2760: 2429: 2178: 2107: 1961: 1258: 174:

The main information from a source, insofar as stated in Knowledge (XXG), must be accompanied by any contradictory and qualifying information from the same source.

3388: 2945: 1643: 1520: 1410: 1313: 1298: 1525: 900: 2930: 2900: 2710: 2459: 2454: 1991: 1440: 1395: 1325: 3468: 2147: 3636: 3243: 1688: 1063: 777: 3328: 1045: 3198: 3073: 1093: 2960: 2675: 2072: 1758: 1540: 1370: 1283: 885: 1818: 1035: 3549: 2850: 2810: 2524: 2137: 2057: 1573: 1475: 1405: 1193: 285:

report what respondents said, and the result may be people disagreeing with each other without knowing about each other, thus not criticizing each other.

3438: 3010: 2193: 3631: 2690: 2127: 1873: 1365: 905: 141:

for an article, without seeing the true meaning of the source. Likewise, some people will select only red cherries or dark purple cherries from a farm.

2489: 2434: 2404: 875: 3158: 3078: 1941: 205: 3473: 3443: 3233: 3213: 2770: 2439: 2394: 2389: 2198: 2082: 1986: 1723: 1435: 1380: 1335: 1273: 1243: 1148: 1138: 910: 3253: 2755: 1355: 1040: 3641: 3408: 3283: 3133: 2855: 2551: 2359: 2238: 2087: 1683: 1505: 1455: 995: 127:

Do not cherrypick. When selecting information from a source, include contradictory and significant qualifying information from the same source.

3423: 3363: 3288: 2780: 2750: 2670: 2499: 1470: 1460: 1425: 1238: 1143: 865: 3463: 3433: 3298: 3273: 3153: 2925: 2384: 2293: 2253: 2157: 1813: 1798: 1673: 1278: 1128: 1083: 1015: 975: 825: 57:

It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of

3575: 3403: 3383: 3308: 3303: 2875: 2364: 2007: 1916: 1778: 1713: 1623: 1613: 1588: 1550: 1545: 1480: 1248: 1208: 1153: 58: 1861: 471:

Different sources may sometimes be treated differently. A case where this would be appropriate may be shown with a hypothetical example:

2479: 2142: 1971: 3597: 3000: 2288: 2273: 2188: 1763: 1108: 855: 850: 3393: 3203: 3173: 3138: 2965: 2444: 2354: 2268: 1911: 1881: 1753: 935: 575:

the one person and ignore most information about most other people, even though they're all extensively detailed in the same source.

243: 193: 181: 1030: 678: 3559: 3428: 3258: 2985: 2885: 2695: 2571: 2484: 2449: 2374: 2344: 2208: 2042: 2032: 1981: 1808: 1793: 1718: 1490: 1340: 1183: 970: 915: 840: 770: 599: 359:

cover. Many sources are well organized and make finding everything you need relatively simple, but not all sources are so helpful.

222: 187: 2474: 2369: 2334: 1163: 642: 3534: 3348: 3263: 3025: 2970: 2890: 2845: 2800: 2795: 2680: 2514: 2309: 2017: 1838: 1618: 1593: 1500: 1495: 1375: 1005: 920: 835: 3529: 2725: 2409: 3585: 3358: 3238: 3118: 3093: 2920: 2556: 2519: 2509: 2112: 2052: 1906: 1203: 1178: 1133: 985: 960: 950: 925: 254:

in biographies, as where a military veteran has a flashback to a wartime experience, as they can make chronologies uncertain.

3478: 3293: 3178: 3103: 2990: 2910: 2880: 2730: 2349: 2319: 2283: 2173: 2037: 1956: 1738: 1603: 1568: 1415: 1173: 1123: 1118: 845: 589: 512: 28: 1901: 1088: 3580: 3168: 3163: 3123: 3108: 3098: 2975: 2820: 2228: 2218: 2117: 1926: 1788: 1073: 945: 3626: 3554: 3511: 3323: 3188: 3088: 3048: 3005: 2950: 2940: 2935: 2905: 2740: 2715: 2700: 2655: 2541: 2263: 2203: 1936: 1773: 1708: 1703: 1693: 1445: 1068: 820: 802: 763: 199: 3228: 3183: 2546: 2419: 2379: 2183: 1921: 1450: 895: 542:

Qualification probably does not require deletion or even debate, as long as significant qualifications are reported.

736: 138: 3458: 3398: 3373: 3313: 3223: 3218: 2805: 2622: 2324: 2314: 2102: 2097: 1515: 1188: 990: 399:

earlier edition and not from a later edition. (An editor with a later edition is encouraged to edit accordingly.)

190:(policy): No original research, by presenting a statement not supported by any source, not even the cited sourcing 196:(policy): Not giving undue weight to a view, by omitting information that shows that it is relatively unimportant 3418: 3368: 3148: 3143: 3113: 2602: 2566: 2561: 2258: 2062: 1896: 1420: 1253: 1228: 1103: 722:(https://archive.org/) (this also has old Web pages), and paid-for databases (often free in libraries) such as 437: 202:(guideline): Not giving a fringe view undue weight, by omitting information that shows that it is a fringe view 158: 3413: 2980: 2835: 2248: 2243: 2027: 1946: 1803: 1465: 870: 3353: 2815: 2612: 2536: 1400: 1345: 1330: 860: 617: 3453: 3063: 2632: 2607: 2586: 1966: 1598: 1390: 955: 487: 295: 62: 657:, June 25, 2011, 3:14 a.m.) and, given that Google said it turned up 441,000 matches for the quotation ( 251: 2627: 2617: 2531: 2504: 1768: 1020: 594: 307: 263: 72: 3083: 2047: 1886: 1783: 980: 494:

has reported that change, but one author's change of view usually is not a change in the consensus.

638: 502:

Cherrypicking should not be done, regardless of whether the result is a quotation or a paraphrase.

2223: 2213: 2122: 786: 208:(guideline): Not using an unreliable source, by omitting information that would show unreliability 50: 605:

Knowledge (XXG):Children's, adult new reader, and large print sources questionable on reliability

1976: 329:

A theologian and a mathematician may contradict each other on the role of a deity in arithmetic.

707: 675: 133: 3248: 3193: 2339: 2278: 1578: 456:

Coauthors who form a stable group can be considered like a single author for these purposes.

715: 719: 711: 17: 653:, as accessed November 27, 2012), although one blog poster argued that it is reasonable ( 486:

This is about consensus in a field or discipline. For consensus in Knowledge (XXG), see

137:"Cherry-picking" a source is selecting only the information favourable to an editor's 27:

This page is about source cherrypicking. For the guideline on rule cherrypicking, see

3620: 3129:

Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith

703: 65:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 699: 695: 29:

Knowledge (XXG):Gaming the system § Gaming the use of policies and guidelines

433: 2330:

Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack

177:

Failure to do so often violates Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines:

730: 755: 423:

Knowledge (XXG)'s citations almost never show which printing is cited.

1734:

Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument

Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause

620:(for an article with largely one-sided views regardless of sourcing) 724: 1199:

Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability

221:

For the policy on not going beyond what sourcing expresses, see

3509: 3046: 2653: 1859: 800: 759: 463:

contradictory statements in one work, such as in an anthology.

113: 36: 2896:

Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article

2068:

Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals

1536:

Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion

694:

Websites supporting searches include, for hardcopy sources,

2425:

Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify

2234:

Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass

1829:

What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion

1169:

Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books

881:

Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country

3657:

Knowledge (XXG) essays introducing or defining new terms

3269:

How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?

3279:

How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle

315: 271: 101: 94: 87: 80: 2831:

No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability

2465:

Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature

645:

Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?

2577:

There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns

1214:

Don't demolish the house while it's still being built

525:

hypothetical examples may illuminate the difference:

3021:

Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé

651:(probably online only), February 11, 2011, 9:19 a.m. 3568: 3522: 2595: 2302: 2166: 2000: 1872: 1632: 1559: 1054: 813: 595:

Knowledge (XXG):Coatrack (the section Fact picking)

3540:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays 3319:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them 941:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction 1511:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards 803:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content 1664:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions 1609:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions 1361:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography 672:Famous For 15 Minutes: My Years With Andy Warhol 641:, that is doubted for want of a primary source ( 3339:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man 3069:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball 2746:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity 1386:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area 891:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia 3647:Knowledge (XXG) essays about original research 2766:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage 1932:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors 1699:Counting and sorting are not original research 403:or just adding new content and new citations. 3652:Knowledge (XXG) essays about reliable sources 3593:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance 3209:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"! 1729:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability 1011:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy 771: 8: 3259:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake 2023:An uncivil environment is a poor environment 1749:How to save an article proposed for deletion 1026:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs 1001:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG) 966:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields 714:(http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/), the 448:With regard to one author's views, editions 2791:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability 554:Outside of Knowledge (XXG), in many media, 482:Consensus change outside of Knowledge (XXG) 3519: 3506: 3484:You don't have to be mad to work here, but 3056: 3043: 2871:Notability is not relevance or reliability 2826:News coverage does not decrease notability 2736:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information 2686:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 2663: 2650: 1869: 1856: 1679:Before commenting in a deletion discussion 1654:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 810: 797: 778: 764: 756: 3379:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you 1669:Arguments to make in deletion discussions 1289:Identifying and using independent sources 3545:Don't cite essays as if they were policy 2706:Big events make key participants notable 2153:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly 1531:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source 1269:Formatting bilateral relations templates 728:(for books and journals) and those from 132: 59:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 3637:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality 2956:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else 2861:Notability is not a level playing field 2776:How the presumption of notability works 1892:Contributing to complicated discussions 1744:How the presumption of notability works 1264:Formatting bilateral relations articles 1079:Adding images improves the encyclopedia 630: 3489:You should not write meaningless lists 2786:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments 2093:Staying cool when the editing gets hot 1834:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork 1659:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews 1224:Don't hope the house will build itself 831:All Five Pillars are equally important 145:In the context of editing an article, 2916:One sentence does not an article make 2866:Notability is not a matter of opinion 2582:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip 2495:Don't throw your toys out of the pram 2013:A weak personal attack is still wrong 1952:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors 1584:Don't throw more litter onto the pile 1526:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress 1351:Minors and persons judged incompetent 1114:An unfinished house is a real problem 1099:Alternatives to the "Expand" template 901:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG) 432:as authoritative and, almost always, 7: 3632:Knowledge (XXG) essays about editing 3469:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes 3449:Things that should not be surprising 3144:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense 2470:Don't remind others of past misdeeds 2415:Don't come down like a ton of bricks 2400:Don't call people by their real name 2148:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning 2078:Profanity, civility, and discussions 1486:There are no shortcuts to neutrality 702:(http://books.google.com/) and, for 600:Knowledge (XXG):How to mine a source 467:Different authors of different works 294:should be reported or summarized as 3344:No one cares about your garage band 3329:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG) 2996:What is and is not routine coverage 2841:No one cares about your garage band 2761:Existence does not prove notability 2179:Assume the assumption of good faith 2108:There is no Divine Right of Editors 1962:Relationships with academic editors 1824:Why was the page I created deleted? 1819:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole 1259:Featured articles may have problems 1046:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki 3389:Please do not murder the newcomers 2946:Reducing consensus to an algorithm 2430:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid 1644:Adjectives in your recommendations 1521:What an article should not include 1411:The problem with elegant variation 1219:Don't get hung up on minor details 1036:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia 63:thoroughly vetted by the community 25: 3642:Knowledge (XXG) behavioral essays 3439:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG) 3011:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase 2711:Businesses with a single location 1992:You have a right to remain silent 1441:Restoring part of a reverted edit 1396:Potential, not just current state 1326:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats 710:(http://www.gutenberg.org/), the 444:Same author across multiple works 2460:Don't knit beside the guillotine 2455:Don't ignore community consensus 1689:Confusing arguments mean nothing 368:be provided in Knowledge (XXG). 258:Multiple sources within a source 117: 40: 34:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 2961:Sources must be out-of-universe 2676:All high schools can be notable 2073:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values 1759:Identifying blatant advertising 1541:The world will not end tomorrow 1371:Not everything needs a template 1284:How to write a featured article 886:Editors will sometimes be wrong 3550:Avoid writing redundant essays 3199:Don't stuff beans up your nose 3074:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 2901:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability 2851:Notability cannot be purchased 2811:Masking the lack of notability 1574:Copyediting reception sections 1476:Temporary versions of articles 1406:Principle of Some Astonishment 1194:Creating controversial content 1094:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 1041:Knowledge (XXG) is a community 1: 3576:About policies and guidelines 2691:Articles with a single source 2315:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can 2138:Two wrongs don't make a right 2128:The rules of polite discourse 2058:It's not the end of the world 1366:Not everything needs a navbox 1234:Don't "teach the controversy" 906:Here to build an encyclopedia 698:(http://www.amazon.com/) and 637:Although often attributed to 363:Merely additional information 3464:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG 3159:BOLD, revert, revert, revert 3079:Alternatives to edit warring 1942:Maintaining a friendly space 498:Paraphrasings and quotations 325:unless they are criticisms. 156:Outside of Knowledge (XXG), 3444:The Five Pillars of Untruth 3234:Editing under the influence 2771:Google searches and numbers 2490:Don't template the regulars 2405:Don't call the kettle black 2199:Be excellent to one another 2083:Revert notification opt-out 1987:We are all Wikipedians here 1436:Put a little effort into it 1381:Obtain peer review comments 1336:Introduction to structurism 1274:Fruit of the poisonous tree 1244:Editors are not mindreaders 1149:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle 1139:Beef up that first revision 911:Leave it to the experienced 876:Don't search for objections 3673: 3474:Why not create an account? 3409:Requirements for adminship 3284:How to vandalize correctly 3254:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG) 3214:Don't delete the main page 3134:Avoid using preview button 2856:Notability comparison test 2440:Don't fight fire with fire 2435:Don't eat the troll's food 2395:Don't call a spade a spade 2390:Don't bludgeon the process 2239:Encourage full discussions 2088:Shadowless Fists of Death! 1724:Don't attack the nominator 1684:But there must be sources! 1506:Try not to leave it a stub 1456:Source your plot summaries 485: 305: 261: 220: 70: 26: 18:Knowledge (XXG):CHERRYPICK 3518: 3505: 3424:Sarcasm is really helpful 3364:Notability is not eternal 3289:How to win a citation war 3059: 3055: 3042: 2751:Every snowflake is unique 2671:Advanced source searching 2666: 2662: 2649: 2552:No, you can't have a pony 2500:Do not insult the vandals 2360:Don't be high-maintenance 1917:Encouraging the newcomers 1868: 1855: 1461:Specialized-style fallacy 1426:Pruning article revisions 1254:Endorsements (commercial) 1239:Editing on mobile devices 1144:Blind men and an elephant 1119:Articles have a half-life 866:Dissent is not disloyalty 836:Avoid vague introductions 809: 796: 488:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus 415:Printings and impressions 3434:The Night Before Wikimas 3299:Ignore every single rule 3274:How to get away with UPE 3154:Before they were notable 2926:Overreliance upon Google 2721:Common sourcing mistakes 2294:Settle the process first 2254:Imagine others complexly 2158:Writing for the opponent 2133:There is no common sense 1814:Unopposed AFD discussion 1799:Relisting can be abusive 1674:Avoid repeated arguments 1279:Give an article a chance 1129:Avoid mission statements 1089:Advanced text formatting 1084:Advanced article editing 1031:Knowledge (XXG) in brief 1016:The rules are principles 976:Product, process, policy 826:Articles must be written 125:This page in a nutshell: 3569:Policies and guidelines 3404:Requests for medication 3384:Please bite the newbies 3309:Mess with the templates 2876:Notability means impact 2410:Don't call things cruft 2385:Don't be the Fun Police 2194:Avoid the word "vandal" 2143:Knowledge (XXG) clichés 2008:A thank you never hurts 1779:Liar liar pants on fire 1714:Deletion is not cleanup 1624:Writing better articles 1614:Write the article first 1589:Gender-neutral language 1561:Writing article content 1551:Writing better articles 1546:Write the article first 1481:Tertiary-source fallacy 1249:Encourage the newcomers 1209:Dictionaries as sources 1154:Build content to endure 712:Perseus Digital Library 649:The Wall Street Journal 550:outside Knowledge (XXG) 3627:Knowledge (XXG) essays 3598:Policy writing is hard 3304:Is that even an essay? 3001:What notability is not 2756:Existence ≠ Notability 2365:Don't be inconsiderate 2289:Read before commenting 2274:Mind your own business 2189:Avoid personal remarks 1764:Identifying test edits 1109:A navbox on every page 1064:100K featured articles 861:Concede lost arguments 856:Competence is required 787:Knowledge (XXG) essays 618:Template:Cherry picked 372:One source or multiple 142: 3394:Pledge of Tranquility 3139:Avoid using wikilinks 2966:Subjective importance 2480:Don't spite your face 2269:Keep it down to earth 2033:Beware of the tigers! 1972:Too long; didn't read 1912:Edit at your own pace 1882:Accepting other users 1649:AfD is not a war zone 996:There is no seniority 936:Neutrality of sources 302:Mixed fields of study 136: 61:, as it has not been 3560:Quote your own essay 3429:Sausages for tasting 3204:Don't-give-a-fuckism 3174:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh? 2986:Vanispamcruftisement 2886:Notability sub-pages 2696:Avoid template creep 2656:Essays on notability 2572:There are no oracles 2355:Don't be a WikiBigot 2209:Call a spade a spade 1982:Unblock perspectives 1809:The Heymann Standard 1794:Overzealous deletion 1754:I just don't like it 1491:There is no deadline 1356:"Murder of" articles 1184:Common-style fallacy 1056:Article construction 971:Process is important 916:Levels of competence 841:Be a reliable source 625:Notes and references 590:WP:Civil POV pushing 570:A positive sense of 563:Positive meaning of 3349:No one really cares 3264:Go ahead, vandalize 3026:Two prongs of merit 2971:Third-party sources 2891:Notabilitymandering 2846:No one really cares 2801:Inherent notability 2796:Independent sources 2681:Alternative outlets 2515:Nationalist editing 2485:Don't take the bait 2450:Don't help too much 2375:Don't be prejudiced 2345:Don't be an ostrich 2310:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI 2043:Deletion as revenge 2018:Advice for hotheads 1839:No Encyclopedic Use 1719:Does deletion help? 1619:Writing about women 1501:The deadline is now 1496:There is a deadline 1376:Nothing is in stone 1006:Tendentious editing 921:Levels of consensus 639:John Maynard Keynes 513:assuming good faith 166:Do not cherrypick. 3359:No sorcery threats 3239:Embrace Stop Signs 3119:Assume good wraith 3094:Anti-Wikipedianism 2931:Perennial websites 2921:Other stuff exists 2557:Passive aggression 2520:No angry mastodons 2510:Hate is disruptive 2370:Don't be obnoxious 2335:Don't be a fanatic 2113:Most ideas are bad 2053:Forgive and forget 1862:Essays on civility 1471:Run an edit-a-thon 1204:Deprecated sources 1179:Citation underkill 1164:Chesterton's fence 1134:Be neutral in form 986:Reasonability rule 951:Oversimplification 926:Most ideas are bad 546:Larger meaning of 520:Deletion or debate 354:Where to find them 143: 3614: 3613: 3610: 3609: 3606: 3605: 3501: 3500: 3497: 3496: 3479:Yes legal threats 3294:Ignore all essays 3179:Complete bollocks 3104:Asshole John rule 3038: 3037: 3034: 3033: 2991:What BLP1E is not 2911:One hundred words 2881:Notability points 2645: 2644: 2641: 2640: 2445:Don't give a fuck 2320:Civil POV pushing 2284:Mutual withdrawal 2174:Assume good faith 2038:Civility warnings 1957:Please say please 1907:Editors' pronouns 1851: 1850: 1847: 1846: 1739:Follow the leader 1604:Use our own words 1569:Avoid thread mode 1416:Pro and con lists 1174:Citation overkill 1124:Autosizing images 846:Civil POV pushing 708:Project Gutenberg 131: 130: 112: 111: 88:WP:CHERRY-PICKING 16:(Redirected from 3664: 3555:Finding an essay 3520: 3507: 3169:Butterfly effect 3164:Boston Tea Party 3124:Assume stupidity 3109:Assume bad faith 3099:Articlecountitis 3057: 3044: 2976:Trivial mentions 2821:Minimum coverage 2664: 2651: 2350:Don't be ashamed 2229:Discussing cruft 2219:Deny recognition 2118:Nothing is clear 1927:Expect no thanks 1870: 1857: 1789:Nothing is clear 1636:deleting content 1319:Tertiary sources 1074:Acronym overkill 946:The one question 811: 798: 791: 780: 773: 766: 757: 750: 747: 741: 716:Internet Archive 692: 686: 668: 662: 635: 381:Multiple sources 318: 274: 223:WP:STICKTOSOURCE 170:Main information 121: 120: 114: 104: 97: 90: 83: 81:WP:CHERRYPICKING 44: 43: 37: 21: 3672: 3671: 3667: 3666: 3665: 3663: 3662: 3661: 3617: 3616: 3615: 3602: 3564: 3535:Value of essays 3514: 3493: 3324:Legal vandalism 3189:Counting juntas 3089:Anti-Wikipedian 3051: 3049:Humorous essays 3030: 3006:What to include 2951:Run-of-the-mill 2941:Read the source 2906:Offline sources 2701:Bare notability 2658: 2637: 2591: 2542:No Confederates 2340:Don't be a jerk 2298: 2264:Keep it concise 2204:Beyond civility 2162: 1996: 1937:How to be civil 1902:Don't retaliate 1864: 1843: 1774:Keep it concise 1709:Delete the junk 1704:Delete or merge 1694:Content removal 1628: 1594:Myth vs fiction 1555: 1446:Robotic editing 1309:Science sources 1304:Primary sources 1294:History sources 1069:Abandoned stubs 1050: 821:Article content 805: 792: 784: 754: 753: 748: 744: 720:Wayback Machine 693: 689: 670:Violet, Ultra, 669: 665: 636: 632: 627: 581: 568: 552: 522: 508: 500: 491: 484: 469: 446: 429: 417: 396: 383: 374: 365: 356: 344: 322: 321: 314: 310: 304: 291: 278: 277: 270: 266: 260: 235: 226: 219: 172: 118: 108: 107: 100: 93: 86: 79: 75: 67: 66: 41: 35: 32: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 3670: 3668: 3660: 3659: 3654: 3649: 3644: 3639: 3634: 3629: 3619: 3618: 3612: 3611: 3608: 3607: 3604: 3603: 3601: 3600: 3595: 3590: 3589: 3588: 3583: 3572: 3570: 3566: 3565: 3563: 3562: 3557: 3552: 3547: 3542: 3537: 3532: 3526: 3524: 3516: 3515: 3510: 3503: 3502: 3499: 3498: 3495: 3494: 3492: 3491: 3486: 3481: 3476: 3471: 3466: 3461: 3456: 3451: 3446: 3441: 3436: 3431: 3426: 3421: 3416: 3411: 3406: 3401: 3396: 3391: 3386: 3381: 3376: 3371: 3366: 3361: 3356: 3351: 3346: 3341: 3336: 3331: 3326: 3321: 3316: 3311: 3306: 3301: 3296: 3291: 3286: 3281: 3276: 3271: 3266: 3261: 3256: 3251: 3246: 3241: 3236: 3231: 3229:Editsummarisis 3226: 3221: 3216: 3211: 3206: 3201: 3196: 3191: 3186: 3184:Counting forks 3181: 3176: 3171: 3166: 3161: 3156: 3151: 3146: 3141: 3136: 3131: 3126: 3121: 3116: 3111: 3106: 3101: 3096: 3091: 3086: 3081: 3076: 3071: 3066: 3060: 3053: 3052: 3047: 3040: 3039: 3036: 3035: 3032: 3031: 3029: 3028: 3023: 3018: 3013: 3008: 3003: 2998: 2993: 2988: 2983: 2978: 2973: 2968: 2963: 2958: 2953: 2948: 2943: 2938: 2933: 2928: 2923: 2918: 2913: 2908: 2903: 2898: 2893: 2888: 2883: 2878: 2873: 2868: 2863: 2858: 2853: 2848: 2843: 2838: 2833: 2828: 2823: 2818: 2813: 2808: 2803: 2798: 2793: 2788: 2783: 2778: 2773: 2768: 2763: 2758: 2753: 2748: 2743: 2741:Don't cite GNG 2738: 2733: 2728: 2723: 2718: 2716:But it's true! 2713: 2708: 2703: 2698: 2693: 2688: 2683: 2678: 2673: 2667: 2660: 2659: 2654: 2647: 2646: 2643: 2642: 2639: 2638: 2636: 2635: 2630: 2625: 2620: 2615: 2613:WikiHarassment 2610: 2605: 2599: 2597: 2593: 2592: 2590: 2589: 2584: 2579: 2574: 2569: 2564: 2559: 2554: 2549: 2547:No queerphobia 2544: 2539: 2534: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2517: 2512: 2507: 2502: 2497: 2492: 2487: 2482: 2477: 2472: 2467: 2462: 2457: 2452: 2447: 2442: 2437: 2432: 2427: 2422: 2417: 2412: 2407: 2402: 2397: 2392: 2387: 2382: 2377: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2357: 2352: 2347: 2342: 2337: 2332: 2327: 2322: 2317: 2312: 2306: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2297: 2296: 2291: 2286: 2281: 2276: 2271: 2266: 2261: 2256: 2251: 2246: 2241: 2236: 2231: 2226: 2221: 2216: 2211: 2206: 2201: 2196: 2191: 2186: 2184:Assume no clue 2181: 2176: 2170: 2168: 2164: 2163: 2161: 2160: 2155: 2150: 2145: 2140: 2135: 2130: 2125: 2120: 2115: 2110: 2105: 2100: 2095: 2090: 2085: 2080: 2075: 2070: 2065: 2060: 2055: 2050: 2045: 2040: 2035: 2030: 2025: 2020: 2015: 2010: 2004: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1995: 1994: 1989: 1984: 1979: 1974: 1969: 1964: 1959: 1954: 1949: 1944: 1939: 1934: 1929: 1924: 1922:Enjoy yourself 1919: 1914: 1909: 1904: 1899: 1894: 1889: 1884: 1878: 1876: 1866: 1865: 1860: 1853: 1852: 1849: 1848: 1845: 1844: 1842: 1841: 1836: 1831: 1826: 1821: 1816: 1811: 1806: 1801: 1796: 1791: 1786: 1781: 1776: 1771: 1766: 1761: 1756: 1751: 1746: 1741: 1736: 1731: 1726: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1696: 1691: 1686: 1681: 1676: 1671: 1666: 1661: 1656: 1651: 1646: 1640: 1638: 1635: 1630: 1629: 1627: 1626: 1621: 1616: 1611: 1606: 1601: 1596: 1591: 1586: 1581: 1576: 1571: 1565: 1563: 1557: 1556: 1554: 1553: 1548: 1543: 1538: 1533: 1528: 1523: 1518: 1513: 1508: 1503: 1498: 1493: 1488: 1483: 1478: 1473: 1468: 1463: 1458: 1453: 1451:Sham consensus 1448: 1443: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1423: 1418: 1413: 1408: 1403: 1398: 1393: 1388: 1383: 1378: 1373: 1368: 1363: 1358: 1353: 1348: 1343: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1316: 1311: 1306: 1301: 1296: 1286: 1281: 1276: 1271: 1266: 1261: 1256: 1251: 1246: 1241: 1236: 1231: 1226: 1221: 1216: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1196: 1191: 1186: 1181: 1176: 1171: 1166: 1161: 1156: 1151: 1146: 1141: 1136: 1131: 1126: 1121: 1116: 1111: 1106: 1101: 1096: 1091: 1086: 1081: 1076: 1071: 1066: 1060: 1058: 1052: 1051: 1049: 1048: 1043: 1038: 1033: 1028: 1023: 1018: 1013: 1008: 1003: 998: 993: 988: 983: 978: 973: 968: 963: 958: 953: 948: 943: 938: 933: 928: 923: 918: 913: 908: 903: 898: 896:Explanationism 893: 888: 883: 878: 873: 868: 863: 858: 853: 848: 843: 838: 833: 828: 823: 817: 815: 807: 806: 801: 794: 793: 785: 783: 782: 775: 768: 760: 752: 751: 742: 687: 663: 643:Zweig, Jason, 629: 628: 626: 623: 622: 621: 609: 608: 602: 597: 592: 580: 577: 567: 561: 551: 544: 540: 539: 535: 531: 521: 518: 507: 504: 499: 496: 483: 480: 468: 465: 445: 442: 428: 425: 416: 413: 395: 392: 382: 379: 373: 370: 364: 361: 355: 352: 343: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 320: 319: 311: 306: 303: 300: 290: 287: 276: 275: 267: 262: 259: 256: 234: 231: 218: 217:Contradictions 215: 210: 209: 203: 197: 191: 185: 171: 168: 129: 128: 122: 110: 109: 106: 105: 102:WP:CHERRY-PICK 98: 91: 84: 76: 71: 68: 56: 55: 47: 45: 33: 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3669: 3658: 3655: 3653: 3650: 3648: 3645: 3643: 3640: 3638: 3635: 3633: 3630: 3628: 3625: 3624: 3622: 3599: 3596: 3594: 3591: 3587: 3584: 3582: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3574: 3573: 3571: 3567: 3561: 3558: 3556: 3553: 3551: 3548: 3546: 3543: 3541: 3538: 3536: 3533: 3531: 3528: 3527: 3525: 3521: 3517: 3513: 3508: 3504: 3490: 3487: 3485: 3482: 3480: 3477: 3475: 3472: 3470: 3467: 3465: 3462: 3460: 3459:Watchlistitis 3457: 3455: 3454:The WikiBible 3452: 3450: 3447: 3445: 3442: 3440: 3437: 3435: 3432: 3430: 3427: 3425: 3422: 3420: 3417: 3415: 3412: 3410: 3407: 3405: 3402: 3400: 3399:R-e-s-p-e-c-t 3397: 3395: 3392: 3390: 3387: 3385: 3382: 3380: 3377: 3375: 3374:Play the game 3372: 3370: 3367: 3365: 3362: 3360: 3357: 3355: 3352: 3350: 3347: 3345: 3342: 3340: 3337: 3335: 3332: 3330: 3327: 3325: 3322: 3320: 3317: 3315: 3314:My local pond 3312: 3310: 3307: 3305: 3302: 3300: 3297: 3295: 3292: 3290: 3287: 3285: 3282: 3280: 3277: 3275: 3272: 3270: 3267: 3265: 3262: 3260: 3257: 3255: 3252: 3250: 3247: 3245: 3242: 3240: 3237: 3235: 3232: 3230: 3227: 3225: 3224:Edits Per Day 3222: 3220: 3219:Editcountitis 3217: 3215: 3212: 3210: 3207: 3205: 3202: 3200: 3197: 3195: 3192: 3190: 3187: 3185: 3182: 3180: 3177: 3175: 3172: 3170: 3167: 3165: 3162: 3160: 3157: 3155: 3152: 3150: 3147: 3145: 3142: 3140: 3137: 3135: 3132: 3130: 3127: 3125: 3122: 3120: 3117: 3115: 3112: 3110: 3107: 3105: 3102: 3100: 3097: 3095: 3092: 3090: 3087: 3085: 3082: 3080: 3077: 3075: 3072: 3070: 3067: 3065: 3062: 3061: 3058: 3054: 3050: 3045: 3041: 3027: 3024: 3022: 3019: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3009: 3007: 3004: 3002: 2999: 2997: 2994: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2984: 2982: 2979: 2977: 2974: 2972: 2969: 2967: 2964: 2962: 2959: 2957: 2954: 2952: 2949: 2947: 2944: 2942: 2939: 2937: 2934: 2932: 2929: 2927: 2924: 2922: 2919: 2917: 2914: 2912: 2909: 2907: 2904: 2902: 2899: 2897: 2894: 2892: 2889: 2887: 2884: 2882: 2879: 2877: 2874: 2872: 2869: 2867: 2864: 2862: 2859: 2857: 2854: 2852: 2849: 2847: 2844: 2842: 2839: 2837: 2834: 2832: 2829: 2827: 2824: 2822: 2819: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2809: 2807: 2806:Insignificant 2804: 2802: 2799: 2797: 2794: 2792: 2789: 2787: 2784: 2782: 2779: 2777: 2774: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2764: 2762: 2759: 2757: 2754: 2752: 2749: 2747: 2744: 2742: 2739: 2737: 2734: 2732: 2729: 2727: 2724: 2722: 2719: 2717: 2714: 2712: 2709: 2707: 2704: 2702: 2699: 2697: 2694: 2692: 2689: 2687: 2684: 2682: 2679: 2677: 2674: 2672: 2669: 2668: 2665: 2661: 2657: 2652: 2648: 2634: 2631: 2629: 2626: 2624: 2623:WikiLawyering 2621: 2619: 2616: 2614: 2611: 2609: 2606: 2604: 2601: 2600: 2598: 2596:WikiRelations 2594: 2588: 2585: 2583: 2580: 2578: 2575: 2573: 2570: 2568: 2565: 2563: 2560: 2558: 2555: 2553: 2550: 2548: 2545: 2543: 2540: 2538: 2535: 2533: 2530: 2526: 2523: 2522: 2521: 2518: 2516: 2513: 2511: 2508: 2506: 2503: 2501: 2498: 2496: 2493: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2481: 2478: 2476: 2473: 2471: 2468: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2456: 2453: 2451: 2448: 2446: 2443: 2441: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2431: 2428: 2426: 2423: 2421: 2420:Don't cry COI 2418: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2406: 2403: 2401: 2398: 2396: 2393: 2391: 2388: 2386: 2383: 2381: 2380:Don't be rude 2378: 2376: 2373: 2371: 2368: 2366: 2363: 2361: 2358: 2356: 2353: 2351: 2348: 2346: 2343: 2341: 2338: 2336: 2333: 2331: 2328: 2326: 2325:Cyberbullying 2323: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2313: 2311: 2308: 2307: 2305: 2301: 2295: 2292: 2290: 2287: 2285: 2282: 2280: 2277: 2275: 2272: 2270: 2267: 2265: 2262: 2260: 2257: 2255: 2252: 2250: 2247: 2245: 2242: 2240: 2237: 2235: 2232: 2230: 2227: 2225: 2222: 2220: 2217: 2215: 2212: 2210: 2207: 2205: 2202: 2200: 2197: 2195: 2192: 2190: 2187: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2171: 2169: 2165: 2159: 2156: 2154: 2151: 2149: 2146: 2144: 2141: 2139: 2136: 2134: 2131: 2129: 2126: 2124: 2121: 2119: 2116: 2114: 2111: 2109: 2106: 2104: 2103:The last word 2101: 2099: 2098:The grey zone 2096: 2094: 2091: 2089: 2086: 2084: 2081: 2079: 2076: 2074: 2071: 2069: 2066: 2064: 2061: 2059: 2056: 2054: 2051: 2049: 2046: 2044: 2041: 2039: 2036: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2026: 2024: 2021: 2019: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2006: 2005: 2003: 1999: 1993: 1990: 1988: 1985: 1983: 1980: 1978: 1975: 1973: 1970: 1968: 1965: 1963: 1960: 1958: 1955: 1953: 1950: 1948: 1945: 1943: 1940: 1938: 1935: 1933: 1930: 1928: 1925: 1923: 1920: 1918: 1915: 1913: 1910: 1908: 1905: 1903: 1900: 1898: 1895: 1893: 1890: 1888: 1885: 1883: 1880: 1879: 1877: 1875: 1871: 1867: 1863: 1858: 1854: 1840: 1837: 1835: 1832: 1830: 1827: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1817: 1815: 1812: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1802: 1800: 1797: 1795: 1792: 1790: 1787: 1785: 1782: 1780: 1777: 1775: 1772: 1770: 1767: 1765: 1762: 1760: 1757: 1755: 1752: 1750: 1747: 1745: 1742: 1740: 1737: 1735: 1732: 1730: 1727: 1725: 1722: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1687: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1670: 1667: 1665: 1662: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1650: 1647: 1645: 1642: 1641: 1639: 1637: 1631: 1625: 1622: 1620: 1617: 1615: 1612: 1610: 1607: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1597: 1595: 1592: 1590: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1577: 1575: 1572: 1570: 1567: 1566: 1564: 1562: 1558: 1552: 1549: 1547: 1544: 1542: 1539: 1537: 1534: 1532: 1529: 1527: 1524: 1522: 1519: 1517: 1516:Walled garden 1514: 1512: 1509: 1507: 1504: 1502: 1499: 1497: 1494: 1492: 1489: 1487: 1484: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1474: 1472: 1469: 1467: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1454: 1452: 1449: 1447: 1444: 1442: 1439: 1437: 1434: 1432: 1429: 1427: 1424: 1422: 1419: 1417: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1407: 1404: 1402: 1399: 1397: 1394: 1392: 1389: 1387: 1384: 1382: 1379: 1377: 1374: 1372: 1369: 1367: 1364: 1362: 1359: 1357: 1354: 1352: 1349: 1347: 1344: 1342: 1341:Mine a source 1339: 1337: 1334: 1332: 1329: 1327: 1324: 1320: 1317: 1315: 1312: 1310: 1307: 1305: 1302: 1300: 1297: 1295: 1292: 1291: 1290: 1287: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1277: 1275: 1272: 1270: 1267: 1265: 1262: 1260: 1257: 1255: 1252: 1250: 1247: 1245: 1242: 1240: 1237: 1235: 1232: 1230: 1227: 1225: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1215: 1212: 1210: 1207: 1205: 1202: 1200: 1197: 1195: 1192: 1190: 1189:Concept cloud 1187: 1185: 1182: 1180: 1177: 1175: 1172: 1170: 1167: 1165: 1162: 1160: 1159:Cherrypicking 1157: 1155: 1152: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1142: 1140: 1137: 1135: 1132: 1130: 1127: 1125: 1122: 1120: 1117: 1115: 1112: 1110: 1107: 1105: 1102: 1100: 1097: 1095: 1092: 1090: 1087: 1085: 1082: 1080: 1077: 1075: 1072: 1070: 1067: 1065: 1062: 1061: 1059: 1057: 1053: 1047: 1044: 1042: 1039: 1037: 1034: 1032: 1029: 1027: 1024: 1022: 1019: 1017: 1014: 1012: 1009: 1007: 1004: 1002: 999: 997: 994: 992: 991:Systemic bias 989: 987: 984: 982: 979: 977: 974: 972: 969: 967: 964: 962: 959: 957: 954: 952: 949: 947: 944: 942: 939: 937: 934: 932: 929: 927: 924: 922: 919: 917: 914: 912: 909: 907: 904: 902: 899: 897: 894: 892: 889: 887: 884: 882: 879: 877: 874: 872: 869: 867: 864: 862: 859: 857: 854: 852: 849: 847: 844: 842: 839: 837: 834: 832: 829: 827: 824: 822: 819: 818: 816: 812: 808: 804: 799: 795: 788: 781: 776: 774: 769: 767: 762: 761: 758: 746: 743: 739: 738: 733: 732: 727: 726: 721: 717: 713: 709: 705: 704:public domain 701: 697: 691: 688: 684: 680: 679:0-380-70843-4 677: 673: 667: 664: 660: 656: 652: 650: 646: 640: 634: 631: 624: 619: 616: 615: 614: 613: 606: 603: 601: 598: 596: 593: 591: 588: 587: 586: 585: 578: 576: 573: 572:cherrypicking 566: 565:cherrypicking 562: 560: 557: 556:cherrypicking 549: 548:cherrypicking 545: 543: 536: 532: 528: 527: 526: 519: 517: 514: 505: 503: 497: 495: 489: 481: 479: 476: 472: 466: 464: 460: 457: 454: 451: 443: 441: 439: 435: 426: 424: 421: 414: 412: 408: 404: 400: 393: 391: 387: 380: 378: 371: 369: 362: 360: 353: 351: 348: 341: 335: 331: 328: 327: 326: 317: 313: 312: 309: 301: 299: 297: 288: 286: 282: 273: 269: 268: 265: 257: 255: 253: 247: 245: 239: 232: 230: 224: 216: 214: 207: 204: 201: 198: 195: 192: 189: 186: 183: 180: 179: 178: 175: 169: 167: 164: 161: 160: 159:cherrypicking 154: 150: 148: 147:cherrypicking 140: 139:point of view 135: 126: 123: 116: 115: 103: 99: 96: 95:WP:CHERRYPICK 92: 89: 85: 82: 78: 77: 74: 69: 64: 60: 54: 52: 46: 39: 38: 30: 19: 3523:About essays 3512:About essays 3419:Rouge editor 3369:Oops Defense 3149:Barnstaritis 3114:Assume faith 2936:Pokémon test 2781:High Schools 2603:WikiBullying 2567:Superhatting 2562:POV railroad 2259:Just drop it 2063:Nobody cares 1897:Divisiveness 1421:Printability 1314:Style guides 1158: 1104:Amnesia test 961:Paraphrasing 745: 735: 729: 723: 700:Google Books 690: 682: 671: 666: 658: 654: 648: 644: 633: 611: 610: 583: 582: 571: 569: 564: 555: 553: 547: 541: 523: 509: 501: 492: 477: 473: 470: 461: 458: 455: 449: 447: 430: 422: 418: 409: 405: 401: 397: 388: 384: 375: 366: 357: 349: 345: 323: 292: 283: 279: 248: 240: 236: 227: 211: 176: 173: 165: 157: 155: 151: 146: 144: 124: 48: 3530:Essay guide 3414:Rouge admin 2981:Video links 2836:No big loss 2525:just madmen 2475:Don't shout 2249:How to lose 2244:Get over it 2028:Be the glue 1947:Negotiation 1804:Relist bias 1634:Removing or 1466:Stub Makers 1299:Law sources 1229:Don't panic 49:This is an 3621:Categories 3586:Guidelines 3354:No, really 3334:LTTAUTMAOK 2816:Make stubs 2537:No racists 2279:Say "MOBY" 2001:Philosophy 1874:The basics 1431:Publicists 1401:Presentism 1346:Merge Test 1331:Inaccuracy 814:Philosophy 696:Amazon.com 683:Disclaimer 681:)), p. v ( 434:microforms 427:Newspapers 342:Qualifiers 252:flashbacks 3064:Adminitis 2633:WikiPeace 2608:WikiCrime 2587:UPPERCASE 1967:Thank you 1599:Proseline 1391:Permastub 956:Paradoxes 871:Don't lie 737:EbscoHost 612:Templates 296:criticism 200:WP:FRINGE 73:Shortcuts 3581:Policies 2731:Coatrack 2628:WikiLove 2618:WikiHate 2532:No Nazis 2505:Griefing 1769:Immunity 1021:Trifecta 851:Cohesion 731:ProQuest 579:See also 506:Remedies 394:Editions 308:Shortcut 289:Critique 272:WP:MSWAS 264:Shortcut 194:WP:UNDUE 3244:Emerson 3084:ANI flu 2048:Failure 1887:Apology 1784:Nothing 981:Purpose 706:works, 316:WP:MFOS 182:WP:NPOV 2726:Clones 2303:Don'ts 2224:Desist 2214:Candor 2123:Reader 584:Essays 450:per se 244:weight 233:Timing 1977:Truce 725:JStor 647:, in 530:rare. 337:bias. 206:WP:RS 188:WP:OR 51:essay 3249:Fart 3194:Crap 1579:Coup 931:Need 734:and 676:ISBN 438:PDFs 2167:Dos 790:(?) 718:or 659:id. 655:id. 3623:: 685:). 436:, 298:. 779:e 772:t 765:v 740:. 490:. 225:. 53:. 31:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Cherrypicking - Knowledge (XXG)

Index