2330:
editors who only care about categories and not about articles. We have all those categories about the years when people were born, and they've never struck me as particularly defining of a life's accomplishments, so the whole issue strikes me as rather silly.) Anyway, for editors who actually pay attention to the subject area, being a Fellow of this
Society is a more important defining characteristic than having been born in a particular year, and, in fact, is a reasonably important characteristic. It strikes me as something that would be mentioned often in secondary sources about persons, and as something that could reasonably be put in the lead section (even if it hasn't been yet on the pages DexDor looked at), so it actually seems to satisfy the definitions of "defining" given at the linked page. --
2355:-- The main article says: "In 2009 SIAM instituted a Fellows program to recognize certain members who have made outstanding contributions to the fields SIAM serves". This suggests that the award has not been lavishly made and is a recognition of the subject's eminence in his field. I note that quite a number of the Presidents of SIAM have blue links to articles. We discourage categories for minor awards as creating clutter, but I think we might regard this as within the exception to .
355:
be applied. The article gatekeepers instead try to use an erratic OR based reasoning for inclusion and are not willing to allow for basic WP-Guidelines being used at the article. Nice stronghold of the faithful. The list does and will not not include the major and most important part of the people addressed with the cat. That is violating WP BLP and is as contentious as currently beyound any fix. Insofar I still opt for a delete.
568:(3) If any are found to not have these reliable sources, they should be removed from the category. (4) The above list article may have been somehow linked to this category at one point, but today that article is increasingly irrelevant to the contents of this category. (5) If reliable sources for inclusion are being followed, there is no issue with WP:COP, WP:LISTPEOPLE or WP:BLPCAT.
1580:(Can we create a new CSD class for categories created by people who clearly have no clue about how Knowledge categories work?). For info: When created this category was placed under categories for: Music, Film, Art, Mineral, Geothermal Energy, Renewable Energy, Soar Energy, Patents, Trademark, Book Publishing. A number of categories by the same editor have also been CSD tagged.
621:
revert those attempts. Of course the only people currently are, and will be, in this category are people who are on record according to reliable sources as someone who is a climate change skeptic. Of course if anyone ever tries to use this category as an attack their edit will be reverted. Don't prevent something very useful because something theoretically could happen.
297:(A) Without an explanation for a divergence there should be a 1:1 relationship between the category and the article/list that serves as the base. (B) They should both follow BLPCAT, which in part would limit entries to those otherwise qualified people for whom their position on the mainstream assessment has been sufficiently noted in secondary RSs (and not just blogs).
384:: I have been looking at all Knowledge articles of the notable people currently in this category, and am one-third complete (more to come). Immediately below are those currently in this category whose public skepticism on the mainstream assessment of climate change appears to have been sufficiently noted in reliable secondary sources, sorted by their profession:
239:, we should categorize people based on defining characteristics. It may very well be the case that climate change skepticsm is the one and only defining characteristic of a person. Same applies to activists for that matter. If needed, the definition of the category may be changed to deal with the several problems that are mentioned in the rationale.
260:) is not relevant. We have several biographies of people whose primary reason for notability is as a climate skeptic. These categories just need to be used properly and not used on any biography where the subject once mentioned skepticism of climate science, instead of having a continued presence and activism in the climate skepticism movement.
2491:
suffers the problems of all "films about" categories: how much "about" the subject must the film be and what reliable sources tell us that it's at least that much. A lot of this is projection (no pun intended), as no doubt reading sufficient comments about
American television's first interracial kiss
2194:
It's one of the highest awards given by the organization. Fellows tend to include it prominently on biographies and CVs, because it represents an acknowledgment by their peers of outstanding contributions over the course of a research career. That's why consensus elsewhere on
Knowledge is that it's a
567:
I believe the following is starting to emerge: (1) Consensus is favoring opposition to this proposed category deletion. (2) The notable people in this category have reliable, secondary sources stating their climate change skepticism, even if not all are scientists appearing in the above list article.
354:
WP guidelines require statements of third parties that certain people are sceptics, right? Currently, the underlying article is deeply entrenched. A simple rule as "categorize all who are repeatedly being deemed an imprtant climate sceptic by reliable third party sources" is not applied and wioll not
2509:
The category contents should be refined to those where interracial romance is a central theme addressed by the work (explanatory header would be useful here). Organising such works by their shared theme is something readers and scholars would expect and the theme of interracial romance in particular
1073:
mention various Native
American chiefs, Taliban folks, Al Qaeda folks, the Lincoln assassins (who were executed by the US army), etc. I have no confidence that this category with its deliberate mixing of underinclusive and overinclusive daughter cats is more than a synthesis and subjective category.
1011:
as proposed, as this fits the current contents, except for "People killed by Nazi
Germany", which is a country not a military force (a convict given the death penalty would meet that criteria, for example). That category should be removed. Given the exclusion of that category, this is clearly a very
1072:
what's categorized here is a hodge-podge. Not all people killed by Nazi
Germany were killed by the German military, for example. And only one person has been killed by the US military??? Really, I kind of thought that a few hundred thousand Confederate forces - some of whom must be notable - not to
747:
Brazil has no such official subdivision. Each
Brazilian state (estado) is divided in municipalities (municĂpios), and each municipality may have zones (zonas), sub-prefectures (subprefeituras), districts (distitos) and neighborhoods (bairros). We simply have no towns here and after I performed some
620:
Then you're not thinking about it enough, and you're not actually looking at the articles of those who are currently in this category. Are articles written according to our opinion? No, and neither is categorization. Do we avoid writing articles because they could be written as attack pages? No, we
2216:
as nominated. Being elected as a fellow of a major academic society is typically one of that society's highest honors, and is defining as a category in that, for instance, it is standard to mention such fellowships when introducing a speaker. But the grammar of the existing category name obviously
824:
Could be. City sound quite "generic" to me, but it'll work. And yes, I did nominate the contents (as I mentioned in my rationale), but there were more articles and sub-categories, I just re-categorized them. The three remaining pages refer to two locations whose actual existence I question and one
335:
for discovering the problems stated in the proposal. While it is easier to delete than fix, please don't take the easy route. It sounds like this cat needs to be split into two or more new cats, probably three: scientists, politicians, and others who have stated they are skeptics. It would require
2299:
Maybe, but judging from your continued argument here you appear to have overlooked my description of why it's defining, which has nothing to do with
Knowledge procedure. It's because when academics write one-paragraph bios about each other (or as I said above when they do the same thing in spoken
601:
This will tend to be overcategorization and an attack category. The fact that someone is a climate change skeptic may not at all relate to their notability, and in those cases this will essentially be categorizaing by opninion, which we do not do. The more I think about this category, the more it
2329:
This discussion is not very important to me, but I just figured I'd look back. I guess the main thing that confuses me is why some editors think that keeping categories as tidy as possible is more important than an understanding of the actual content of pages. (I suspect NONDEF is only edited by
582:
Thoughts: (1) Perhaps the scientists in this category not appearing in the above list article should be added to that article. (2) Perhaps this category should become three categories: Category:Climate change skeptics (scientists), Category:Climate change skeptics (politicians), Category:Climate
1402:
There is no clear use of the above category. I would also support deletion of the parent category on the grounds that gathering categories related to templates in one place on the grounds that they are categories doesn't seem to serve any administrative function and it a needless split of
761:
By the way, I never understood the difference between the two cats above. I'd be glad if anyone could clarify why we categorize
Brazilian municipalities with "Populated places in STATE" instead of "Municipalities of STATE", since the official Brazilian definition of a city/town/village is
2454:
It makes sense to have this category for films like West Side Story and
Pocahontas, but the current title is a little too broad including films like Rugrats and Napoleon Dynamite, which do have interracial romances in them, but the fact that they're interracial is never even mentioned.
1668:-- The one article may possibly need further categories but most of the parents are examples of where the company in the article might like to trade, not what it is concerned with. In other words this category is mis-formed and it would be better to start from scratch.
1561:. Category created by a new single purpose editor promoting their royalty investment company. The only content is the investment company. Editor seems to have a misunderstanding of the purpose of categories. I can't envisage much scope for additional content.
2140:
characteristic (and adds to category clutter). It may be appropriate to create a list of presidents (or fellows) of the society - but it would be better for such a list to be created directly from a RS. If not deleted then rename per nom.
2425:
rename; there's also consensus to prune the contents of the category to those for which the interracial nature of the romance is significant. The pruning won't be carried out as part of this close, but any user can work on
2101:
2195:
criterion for notability. Your argument doesn't seem to distinguish between this and other awards given by organizations. Care to explain why you think this category should be deleted and other, similar subcats of
1131:, which for some reason that I can't imagine was nice and full even though the IDF since its creation has killed far less, even in proportion to its size, than dozens of other militarys in the same time span. --
1633:
This category contains one article and an empty sub-category. Whatever the hypothetical usage that might be useful, the category currently is not categorizing anything. No objection to recreating later.
2132:. Having looked at a sample of articles in this category most make no mention of this society so it can hardly be a defining characteristic of such peple. Even on articles where it is mentioned (
256:
This category should be used when climate change skepticism is a principal driver of the person's public work. I disagree with the opinion that categorisation by activism issue (as contained in
2251:. It is an understandable mistake to say that the category is "not defining". It is actually a significant factor in determining whether or not the subjects of such pages are notable per
1092:
1091:
As long as we have the subcats (e.g. for IDF) then we should keep this category. If for no other reason than it makes it easier to target the subcats for CFD. See related discussion
42:
37:
175:
are not being followed. The underlying article does exclude a large part of the people in the category (especially non-climate-scientists and politicians) and contradicts
1352:
AFAIK there's no rule saying that a template category containing only a small (how small?) number of templates is a problem that needs to be fixed. Per the exception in
389:
156:
1981:
579:
category under discussion, Category:Climate change skeptics, contains only people and is a subcategory of Category:Climate change skepticism, which is good structure.
1209:-- It may be necessary to purge out elements of the Nazi Germany member, which probably includes holocaust victims (who were not killed by soldiers). Better still
2163:
this seems a reasonable category to keep. SIAM is old, but the Fellow designation is new, which perhaps is why you don't see it mentioned in every article.
2097:
2444:
771:
202:
we shouldn't categorize people based on one position they have - which of course calls into question the "Climate change activists" tree as well.
21:
1152:
The IDF category seems POV to me and it likely suffers the same problems highlighted above and probably should be deleted, you can nominate it.
2080:
1989:
1879:
1501:
1380:
1210:
1025:
961:
945:
941:
98:
1024:
This is better than the current category and matches the subcategories. But I think this category is still too vague and maybe something like
280:
just above. These people are activists and need and deserve to be categorized as such. They are not hiding their ideas; they publicize them.
2196:
2156:
2112:
1967:
1963:
949:
802:? The former is much better developed and matches the naming on the parent categories. Also, I see that you have nominated the contents of
1046:
Such a rename/rescope should also apply to the subcategories so that should be a separate discussion. DexDor 06:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1128:
953:
865:
753:
17:
2180:
no indication that this is defining; if inclusion is automatic upon application it's trivial; if otherwise, it's a non-defining award.
1330:
1322:
1618:
583:
change skeptics (other public figures), each a subcategory of Category:Climate change skepticism. Please provide your thoughts below.
572:
549:
176:
1652:
1599:
799:
749:
525:
1769:
1313:
1854:
1739:
1180:
1138:
1777:
161:
Several of these individuals are included in List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming.
1376:
982:
545:
1760:
767:
125:
763:
163:
The definition and use of the category is insofar neither applicable, nor comprehensive nor along basic WP policy rules.
2440:
1404:
992:
More grammatical title and better fit to the subcategories. Possible alternative: "People killed by a military force".
2514:
2501:
2483:
2464:
2432:
2364:
2339:
2324:
2294:
2264:
2243:
2226:
2206:
2189:
2170:
2150:
2122:
2089:
2012:
1998:
1955:
1888:
1866:
1845:
1826:
1808:
1751:
1677:
1660:
1643:
1625:
1607:
1589:
1570:
1510:
1433:
1411:
1392:
1365:
1304:
1234:
1222:
1189:
1161:
1147:
1118:
1104:
1082:
1058:
1037:
1016:
1001:
970:
877:
856:
835:
815:
784:
699:
630:
611:
592:
364:
345:
323:
306:
289:
264:
248:
229:
211:
192:
133:
107:
257:
116:
220:. It has neither a definition nor a defining article. Would you open an AfD for it? I am sort of lukewarm about it.
2086:
1995:
1885:
1639:
1507:
1054:
1033:
967:
717:
463:
302:
104:
748:
fixes and proposed some deletions, I realized this category will remain unpopulated forever since we already have
2534:
2412:
2384:
2060:
2032:
1936:
1908:
1725:
1697:
1481:
1453:
1282:
1254:
978:
925:
897:
795:
680:
652:
607:
78:
1093:
Knowledge:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2014_October_21#Category:People_killed_by_the_United_States_Armed_Forces
2497:
2320:
2222:
2185:
1157:
1114:
1078:
852:
207:
2300:
rather than written language) they usually include this specific piece of information. A few random examples:
803:
708:
1528:
825:
place that seems to be actually a private farm (subject to our GNG, therefore), not a geographical location.
2360:
1862:
1673:
1218:
1213:, which will include the navies and air forces for countries where only soldiers are part of the military.
873:
725:
2511:
2274:
2137:
2009:
1622:
1013:
833:
782:
261:
244:
1799:
Seems like a questionable sub-category to me; does it matter that the films are sequels in this context?
336:
peeking into each of the 86 articles in this category. If you must, you can contact me for help. Cheers.
2530:
2408:
2380:
2203:
2167:
2119:
2076:
2056:
2028:
1985:
1932:
1904:
1875:
1743:
1721:
1693:
1656:
1635:
1603:
1519:
1497:
1477:
1449:
1278:
1250:
1050:
1029:
957:
921:
893:
811:
676:
648:
381:
298:
94:
74:
2474:
per nom. Any category under a "Films about ..." category should also be a "Films about ..." category.
2305:
2335:
2260:
2239:
1379:
for my rationale for creating this category. Your thoughts there about the purpose and usefulness of
1301:
1185:
1143:
603:
168:
1536:
1049:
Fair enough. Making the less flawed name consistent is still progress so I support this nomination.
2493:
2429:
2316:
2218:
2181:
2159:, which I don't think is appropriate. Given that we use fellow status in groups like SIAM to prove
1952:
1842:
1748:
1153:
1110:
1074:
848:
847:
all of Brazil's settlements will and ought be either cities or municipalities or populated places.
696:
626:
588:
341:
203:
693:
delete (category was empty upon close, but it seems there is agreement that this should not exist)
93:. As closer I will only remove the template etc, and leave it to others to remedy the problems. –
2356:
2278:
2252:
1858:
1669:
1420:
1353:
1214:
869:
521:
180:
770:, why can't it be the same for Brazilian municipalities? We currently have one category called
2529:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2379:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2234:
David and Lagrange say it all, significant honor used to determine notability of academics. --
2027:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1903:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1835:
1804:
1692:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1448:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1429:
1408:
1388:
1249:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
892:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
826:
775:
647:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
396:
277:
273:
240:
2407:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2055:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1931:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1720:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1476:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1277:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
920:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
675:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
183:
applies. Btw, it may not be deemed a WP:Navigational list, as it is not a mainspace feature.
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2479:
2290:
2200:
2164:
2146:
2116:
2008:
as more natural phrasing (and support related German sub-category rename proposal as well).
1585:
1361:
1100:
997:
807:
537:
494:
486:
478:
440:
424:
412:
360:
319:
285:
225:
188:
172:
2460:
2331:
2312:
2256:
2235:
1566:
1298:
1175:
1133:
432:
408:
314:
Primary notability as a climate skeptic suggests we should have this for organization. --
575:, which was a fine idea. Category:Climate change skepticism does not contain any people.
2160:
1838:
622:
584:
482:
428:
404:
351:
337:
2309:
868:. After which those that are municipalities or cities can be manually recatgorised.
1231:
459:
164:
1109:
I grant that that's a plausible reason to stay execution, but it's just a stay. :-)
1820:
1800:
1425:
1384:
529:
498:
455:
436:
416:
400:
1617:
Better dealt with as part of the tree of that covers the provenance of royalties (
390:
List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
157:
List of scientists opposing the mainstream scientific assessment of global warming
2475:
2301:
2286:
2142:
1581:
1357:
1096:
993:
541:
533:
513:
420:
377:
356:
332:
315:
281:
221:
184:
2492:
on Star Trek, one could assert that Star Trek was "about" interracial kissing.
762:"municipality"). I know there has been a discussion in 2010, but, for example,
2456:
2311:. As for your not-so-veiled accusation that Tryptofish is confused: please be
2281:
are mutually exclusive. I suggest you read the paragraph of NONDEF beginning "
1562:
517:
490:
2307:
2133:
159:
as main and base of the definition, using however the interesting notion of
2401:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2049:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1925:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1714:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1470:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1271:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
914:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
669:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1984:. Secondly, none of the athletics parents include "track and field". –
2102:
Category:Fellows of the Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
2303:
2273:
You appear to be making the assumption that (a characteristic) being
774:(with no similar cats for the other states), is it a valid category?
2098:
Category:Fellows of Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
2042:
Category:Fellows of Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics
571:
Note: Recently, Category:Climate change denial was merged into
555:
Immediately below are those currently in this category who do
1383:
would be appreciated. Should that cat be deleted as well?
1377:
Template talk:Template category#Remove auto-categorization
1127:
I created the parent cat and other subcats in fairness to
944:. For the record, the contents at the time of closure are
2523:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2373:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2021:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1897:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1686:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1442:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1243:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1026:
Category:Civilians deliberately killed by military forces
886:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
641:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
559:
have reliable secondary sources noting their skepticism:
177:
Knowledge:Categorization_of_people#Consider_making_a_list
2155:
This would militate for deleting most of the subcats of
1964:
Category:Athletics (track and field) national champions
1918:
Category:Athletics (track and field) national champions
1785:
1781:
1773:
1765:
1544:
1540:
1532:
1524:
1338:
1334:
1326:
1318:
1171:
733:
729:
721:
713:
141:
137:
129:
121:
2537:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2415:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2387:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2063:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2035:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1939:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1911:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1728:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1700:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1484:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1456:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1285:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1257:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1129:
Category:People killed by the Israel Defense Forces
1028:might be closer to what is being categorized here.
928:). No further edits should be made to this section.
900:). No further edits should be made to this section.
683:). No further edits should be made to this section.
655:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
954:Category:People killed by the Turkish Armed Forces
1853:-- probably to both parents, but perhaps just to
2510:has a long and storied history within the arts.
1982:Category:National association football champions
1230:-- - change to - people killed by armed forces
2111:Grammar and consistency with other subcats of
1980:. Firstly, "National" should come first, like
548:(mathematician, engineer, think tank member),
528:(weathercaster and Weather Channel founder),
8:
1314:Category:Small Knowledge template categories
1264:Category:Small Knowledge template categories
532:(weathercaster and WeatherAction founder),
983:Category:People killed by military forces
272:for the well written reasons provided by
218:Category:Climate change environmentalists
2445:Category:Films about interracial romance
524:(journalist and news magazine founder),
423:(atmospheric scientist and researcher),
1761:Category:Computer-animated sequel films
1707:Category:Computer-animated sequel films
772:Category:Municipalities in Minas Gerais
329:keep (Oppose deletion) but fix problems
1381:Category:Knowledge template categories
1211:Category:People killed by armed forces
1012:thin tree, but arguably a viable one.
946:Category:People killed by Nazi Germany
942:Category:People killed by armed forces
2197:Category:Fellows of learned societies
2157:Category:Fellows of learned societies
2113:Category:Fellows of learned societies
1968:Category:National athletics champions
950:Category:People killed by the Taliban
768:Category:Populated places in New York
509:appearing in the above list article):
474:appearing in the above list article):
7:
451:appearing in the above list article:
439:(physicist and Nobel Prize winner),
388:Scientists appearing in the article
2283:Often, users can become confused...
1419:- Per nom and per the exception in
1356:most of these categories are fine.
866:Category:Populated places in Brazil
764:Category:Municipalities in New York
754:Category:Populated places in Brazil
415:, (geologist and palaeontologist),
179:by the use of the category itself.
18:Knowledge:Categories for discussion
2441:Category:Interracial romance films
2394:Category:Interracial romance films
1619:Category:Intellectual property law
800:Category:Municipalities of Brazil‎
573:Category:Climate change skepticism
216:There is no activist cat, but one
28:
2422:The result of the discussion was:
2070:The result of the discussion was:
1946:The result of the discussion was:
1874:; I can't see why not to both. –
1735:The result of the discussion was:
1491:The result of the discussion was:
1292:The result of the discussion was:
935:The result of the discussion was:
750:Category:Municipalities of Brazil
690:The result of the discussion was:
493:(U.S. House of Representatives),
489:(U.S. House of Representatives),
481:(U.S. House of Representatives),
88:The result of the discussion was:
1855:Category:Computer-animated films
1740:Category:Computer-animated films
117:Category:Climate change skeptics
60:Category:Climate change skeptics
1738:delete and upmerge contents to
602:seems to categorize by opinion.
485:(Canadian Minister of State),
1:
1235:01:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
700:01:02, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
593:17:29, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
497:(U.K. Member of Parliament),
399:(geochemist and politician),
365:06:57, 12 November 2014 (UTC)
30:
2515:21:19, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
2502:17:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2484:18:31, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
2465:00:35, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
2433:01:53, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
2365:17:36, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
2340:20:07, 25 October 2014 (UTC)
2325:06:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2295:05:49, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
2265:21:11, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
2244:03:29, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
2227:02:40, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
2207:00:04, 23 October 2014 (UTC)
2190:17:30, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2171:01:51, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
2151:18:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
2123:00:54, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
2090:21:43, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
2013:22:22, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1999:12:47, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1956:01:54, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
1889:21:35, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
1867:17:30, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1846:18:23, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1827:17:59, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1809:16:16, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1752:01:56, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
1678:17:28, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1661:04:47, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1644:01:36, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1626:22:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1608:04:45, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1590:18:20, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1571:16:30, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1511:21:31, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
1434:23:49, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1412:22:18, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1405:Category:Knowledge templates
1393:20:28, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1366:18:07, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1305:14:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
1223:17:24, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
1190:03:34, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
1162:19:05, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
1148:03:46, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
1119:22:23, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1105:20:50, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1083:17:13, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1059:12:34, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1038:01:32, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
1017:22:13, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
1002:18:50, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
971:12:25, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
878:17:20, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
857:17:04, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
836:00:06, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
816:20:44, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
785:19:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
631:13:43, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
612:04:42, 5 December 2014 (UTC)
427:(professor of climatology),
346:16:29, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
324:04:00, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
307:02:21, 27 October 2014 (UTC)
290:23:37, 26 October 2014 (UTC)
265:21:14, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
249:13:04, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
230:09:24, 22 October 2014 (UTC)
212:16:59, 21 October 2014 (UTC)
193:23:43, 20 October 2014 (UTC)
108:12:33, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
1578:Delete - speedy if possible
979:Category:Deaths by military
907:Category:Deaths by military
258:Category:Activists by issue
2554:
796:Category:Cities in Brazil‎
464:Sonja Boehmer-Christiansen
407:(professor of geography),
403:(professor of geography),
466:(professor of geography)
443:(chemist and politician)
419:(atmospheric scientist),
373:Analysis of this category
2526:Please do not modify it.
2404:Please do not modify it.
2376:Please do not modify it.
2161:notability for academics
2052:Please do not modify it.
2024:Please do not modify it.
1928:Please do not modify it.
1900:Please do not modify it.
1717:Please do not modify it.
1689:Please do not modify it.
1473:Please do not modify it.
1445:Please do not modify it.
1274:Please do not modify it.
1246:Please do not modify it.
917:Please do not modify it.
889:Please do not modify it.
804:Category:Towns in Brazil
709:Category:Towns in Brazil
672:Please do not modify it.
662:Category:Towns in Brazil
644:Please do not modify it.
435:(professor of geology),
431:(professor of physics),
70:Please do not modify it.
1872:Upmerge to both parents
544:(think tank director),
2452:Nominator's rationale:
2277:and being relevant to
2109:Nominator's rationale:
1975:Nominator's rationale:
1797:Nominator's rationale:
1556:Nominator's rationale:
1350:Nominator's rationale:
990:Nominator's rationale:
745:Nominator's rationale:
516:(think tank founder),
505:Other public figures (
153:Nominator's rationale:
2136:) it appears to be a
1818:Overcat and trivial.
1744:Category:Sequel films
552:(think tank founder)
295:Keep but fix problems
270:keep current category
501:(U.K. party leader)
1520:Category:Royalties
1463:Category:Royalties
522:Christopher Booker
411:(astrophysicist),
604:John Pack Lambert
458:(meteorologist),
51:
50:
2545:
2528:
2438:Propose renaming
2406:
2378:
2095:Propose renaming
2083:
2054:
2026:
1992:
1961:Propose renaming
1930:
1902:
1882:
1823:
1790:
1789:
1757:Propose deleting
1719:
1691:
1636:RevelationDirect
1549:
1548:
1516:Propose deleting
1504:
1475:
1447:
1343:
1342:
1310:Propose deleting
1276:
1248:
1183:
1178:
1141:
1136:
1051:RevelationDirect
1030:RevelationDirect
976:Propose renaming
964:
919:
891:
831:
780:
766:is a sub-cat of
738:
737:
705:Propose deleting
674:
646:
538:James Delingpole
536:(commentator ),
495:Douglas Carswell
487:Marsha Blackburn
479:Michele Bachmann
441:Fritz Vahrenholt
425:Chris de Freitas
413:Robert M. Carter
382:NewsAndEventsGuy
299:NewsAndEventsGuy
146:
145:
113:Propose deleting
101:
72:
47:
36:
31:
2553:
2552:
2548:
2547:
2546:
2544:
2543:
2542:
2541:
2535:deletion review
2524:
2430:Good Ol’factory
2413:deletion review
2402:
2396:
2391:
2385:deletion review
2374:
2275:WP:NON-DEFINING
2249:Keep and rename
2232:Keep and rename
2217:needs fixing. —
2214:Keep and rename
2138:WP:NON-DEFINING
2081:
2061:deletion review
2050:
2044:
2039:
2033:deletion review
2022:
1990:
1953:Good Ol’factory
1937:deletion review
1926:
1920:
1915:
1909:deletion review
1898:
1880:
1821:
1763:
1759:
1749:Good Ol’factory
1726:deletion review
1715:
1709:
1704:
1698:deletion review
1687:
1522:
1518:
1502:
1482:deletion review
1471:
1465:
1460:
1454:deletion review
1443:
1316:
1312:
1283:deletion review
1272:
1266:
1261:
1255:deletion review
1244:
1181:
1176:
1139:
1134:
962:
926:deletion review
915:
909:
904:
898:deletion review
887:
827:
776:
711:
707:
697:Good Ol’factory
681:deletion review
670:
664:
659:
653:deletion review
642:
520:(commentator),
433:Don Easterbrook
409:Sallie Baliunas
375:
155:The cat claims
119:
115:
99:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2551:
2549:
2540:
2539:
2519:
2518:
2517:
2507:Support rename
2504:
2494:Carlossuarez46
2486:
2468:
2467:
2449:
2448:
2447:
2418:
2417:
2397:
2395:
2392:
2390:
2389:
2369:
2368:
2367:
2349:
2348:
2347:
2346:
2345:
2344:
2343:
2342:
2317:David Eppstein
2268:
2267:
2246:
2229:
2219:David Eppstein
2211:
2210:
2209:
2199:shouldn't be?
2182:Carlossuarez46
2175:
2174:
2173:
2126:
2125:
2106:
2105:
2104:
2066:
2065:
2045:
2043:
2040:
2038:
2037:
2017:
2016:
2015:
2002:
2001:
1972:
1971:
1970:
1942:
1941:
1921:
1919:
1916:
1914:
1913:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1869:
1848:
1829:
1812:
1811:
1794:
1793:
1792:
1791:
1731:
1730:
1710:
1708:
1705:
1703:
1702:
1682:
1681:
1680:
1663:
1646:
1628:
1612:
1611:
1610:
1574:
1573:
1553:
1552:
1551:
1550:
1487:
1486:
1466:
1464:
1461:
1459:
1458:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1414:
1396:
1395:
1369:
1368:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1288:
1287:
1267:
1265:
1262:
1260:
1259:
1239:
1238:
1237:
1225:
1203:
1202:
1201:
1200:
1199:
1198:
1197:
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1165:
1164:
1154:Carlossuarez46
1122:
1121:
1111:Carlossuarez46
1086:
1085:
1075:Carlossuarez46
1066:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1041:
1040:
1019:
1005:
1004:
987:
986:
985:
931:
930:
910:
908:
905:
903:
902:
882:
881:
880:
859:
849:Carlossuarez46
841:
840:
839:
838:
819:
818:
806:for deletion.
794:. What about
788:
787:
758:
757:
742:
741:
740:
739:
686:
685:
665:
663:
660:
658:
657:
637:
636:
635:
634:
633:
615:
614:
565:
564:
540:(journalist),
511:
510:
483:Maxime Bernier
476:
475:
453:
452:
429:David Douglass
405:Robert Balling
397:Claude Allègre
394:
393:
374:
371:
370:
369:
368:
367:
326:
309:
292:
267:
251:
234:
233:
232:
204:Carlossuarez46
196:
195:
150:
149:
148:
147:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2550:
2538:
2536:
2532:
2527:
2521:
2520:
2516:
2513:
2508:
2505:
2503:
2499:
2495:
2490:
2487:
2485:
2481:
2477:
2473:
2470:
2469:
2466:
2462:
2458:
2453:
2450:
2446:
2442:
2439:
2436:
2435:
2434:
2431:
2427:
2423:
2420:
2419:
2416:
2414:
2410:
2405:
2399:
2398:
2393:
2388:
2386:
2382:
2377:
2371:
2370:
2366:
2362:
2358:
2357:Peterkingiron
2354:
2353:Possible keep
2351:
2350:
2341:
2337:
2333:
2328:
2327:
2326:
2322:
2318:
2314:
2310:
2308:
2306:
2304:
2302:
2298:
2297:
2296:
2292:
2288:
2284:
2280:
2276:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2269:
2266:
2262:
2258:
2254:
2250:
2247:
2245:
2241:
2237:
2233:
2230:
2228:
2224:
2220:
2215:
2212:
2208:
2205:
2202:
2198:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2176:
2172:
2169:
2166:
2162:
2158:
2154:
2153:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2139:
2135:
2131:
2128:
2127:
2124:
2121:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2107:
2103:
2099:
2096:
2093:
2092:
2091:
2088:
2085:
2084:
2078:
2074:
2071:
2068:
2067:
2064:
2062:
2058:
2053:
2047:
2046:
2041:
2036:
2034:
2030:
2025:
2019:
2018:
2014:
2011:
2007:
2004:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1994:
1993:
1987:
1983:
1979:
1976:
1973:
1969:
1965:
1962:
1959:
1958:
1957:
1954:
1950:
1947:
1944:
1943:
1940:
1938:
1934:
1929:
1923:
1922:
1917:
1912:
1910:
1906:
1901:
1895:
1894:
1890:
1887:
1884:
1883:
1877:
1873:
1870:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1859:Peterkingiron
1856:
1852:
1849:
1847:
1844:
1840:
1837:
1833:
1830:
1828:
1825:
1824:
1817:
1814:
1813:
1810:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1795:
1787:
1783:
1779:
1775:
1771:
1767:
1762:
1758:
1755:
1754:
1753:
1750:
1746:
1745:
1741:
1736:
1733:
1732:
1729:
1727:
1723:
1718:
1712:
1711:
1706:
1701:
1699:
1695:
1690:
1684:
1683:
1679:
1675:
1671:
1670:Peterkingiron
1667:
1664:
1662:
1658:
1654:
1650:
1647:
1645:
1641:
1637:
1632:
1629:
1627:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1613:
1609:
1605:
1601:
1597:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1579:
1576:
1575:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1560:
1557:
1554:
1546:
1542:
1538:
1534:
1530:
1526:
1521:
1517:
1514:
1513:
1512:
1509:
1506:
1505:
1499:
1495:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1485:
1483:
1479:
1474:
1468:
1467:
1462:
1457:
1455:
1451:
1446:
1440:
1439:
1435:
1432:
1431:
1427:
1422:
1418:
1415:
1413:
1410:
1406:
1401:
1398:
1397:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1371:
1370:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1351:
1348:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1324:
1320:
1315:
1311:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1303:
1300:
1296:
1293:
1290:
1289:
1286:
1284:
1280:
1275:
1269:
1268:
1263:
1258:
1256:
1252:
1247:
1241:
1240:
1236:
1233:
1229:
1226:
1224:
1220:
1216:
1215:Peterkingiron
1212:
1208:
1205:
1204:
1191:
1188:
1187:
1184:
1179:
1172:
1169:
1168:
1167:
1166:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1151:
1150:
1149:
1146:
1145:
1142:
1137:
1130:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1120:
1116:
1112:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1102:
1098:
1094:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1087:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1071:
1068:
1067:
1060:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1047:
1045:
1044:
1043:
1042:
1039:
1035:
1031:
1027:
1023:
1020:
1018:
1015:
1010:
1007:
1006:
1003:
999:
995:
991:
988:
984:
980:
977:
974:
973:
972:
969:
966:
965:
959:
955:
951:
947:
943:
939:
936:
933:
932:
929:
927:
923:
918:
912:
911:
906:
901:
899:
895:
890:
884:
883:
879:
875:
871:
870:Peterkingiron
867:
863:
860:
858:
854:
850:
846:
843:
842:
837:
834:
832:
830:
823:
822:
821:
820:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
797:
793:
790:
789:
786:
783:
781:
779:
773:
769:
765:
760:
759:
755:
751:
746:
743:
735:
731:
727:
723:
719:
715:
710:
706:
703:
702:
701:
698:
694:
691:
688:
687:
684:
682:
678:
673:
667:
666:
661:
656:
654:
650:
645:
639:
638:
632:
628:
624:
619:
618:
617:
616:
613:
609:
605:
600:
597:
596:
595:
594:
590:
586:
580:
578:
574:
569:
563:(None so far)
562:
561:
560:
558:
553:
551:
547:
543:
539:
535:
531:
527:
523:
519:
515:
508:
504:
503:
502:
500:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
473:
470:Politicians (
469:
468:
467:
465:
461:
460:David Bellamy
457:
450:
446:
445:
444:
442:
438:
434:
430:
426:
422:
418:
414:
410:
406:
402:
398:
391:
387:
386:
385:
383:
379:
372:
366:
362:
358:
353:
349:
348:
347:
343:
339:
334:
330:
327:
325:
321:
317:
313:
310:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
291:
287:
283:
279:
275:
271:
268:
266:
263:
259:
255:
252:
250:
246:
242:
238:
235:
231:
227:
223:
219:
215:
214:
213:
209:
205:
201:
198:
197:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
174:
170:
169:WP:LISTPEOPLE
166:
162:
158:
154:
151:
143:
139:
135:
131:
127:
123:
118:
114:
111:
110:
109:
106:
103:
102:
96:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
2525:
2522:
2506:
2488:
2471:
2451:
2437:
2424:
2421:
2403:
2400:
2375:
2372:
2352:
2282:
2248:
2231:
2213:
2177:
2129:
2108:
2094:
2079:
2072:
2069:
2051:
2048:
2023:
2020:
2005:
1988:
1977:
1974:
1960:
1948:
1945:
1927:
1924:
1899:
1896:
1878:
1871:
1850:
1831:
1819:
1815:
1796:
1756:
1737:
1734:
1716:
1713:
1688:
1685:
1665:
1648:
1630:
1614:
1598:be that? --
1595:
1577:
1558:
1555:
1515:
1500:
1493:
1490:
1472:
1469:
1444:
1441:
1424:
1416:
1399:
1372:
1349:
1309:
1294:
1291:
1273:
1270:
1245:
1242:
1227:
1206:
1186:(yada, yada)
1174:
1144:(yada, yada)
1132:
1069:
1022:Weak Support
1021:
1008:
989:
975:
960:
937:
934:
916:
913:
888:
885:
861:
844:
829:VictĂŁo Lopes
828:
791:
778:VictĂŁo Lopes
777:
744:
704:
692:
689:
671:
668:
643:
640:
598:
581:
576:
570:
566:
556:
554:
530:Piers Corbyn
526:John Coleman
512:
506:
499:Nigel Farage
477:
471:
462:(botanist),
456:Joe Bastardi
454:
448:
437:Ivar Giaever
417:John Christy
401:Timothy Ball
395:
376:
328:
311:
294:
274:Marcocapelle
269:
253:
241:Marcocapelle
236:
217:
199:
160:
152:
112:
97:
91:keep but fix
90:
87:
69:
66:
2279:WP:ACADEMIC
2253:WP:ACADEMIC
1653:67.70.35.44
1651:per nom --
1600:67.70.35.44
1421:WP:SMALLCAT
1354:WP:SMALLCAT
808:Vegaswikian
546:David Evans
542:Myron Ebell
534:Ann Coulter
514:Joseph Bast
447:Scientists
421:Petr Chylek
181:WP:Coatrack
2332:Tryptofish
2257:Tryptofish
2236:Randykitty
1836:WP:OVERCAT
1302:Od Mishehu
518:Glenn Beck
491:Paul Broun
331:Thanks to
55:October 20
43:October 21
38:October 19
2531:talk page
2409:talk page
2381:talk page
2077:Fayenatic
2057:talk page
2029:talk page
1986:Fayenatic
1933:talk page
1905:talk page
1876:Fayenatic
1839:MarnetteD
1722:talk page
1694:talk page
1594:wouldn't
1498:Fayenatic
1478:talk page
1450:talk page
1299:עוד מישהו
1279:talk page
1251:talk page
958:Fayenatic
922:talk page
894:talk page
677:talk page
649:talk page
623:Prhartcom
585:Prhartcom
550:Ray Evans
352:Prhartcom
338:Prhartcom
173:WP:BLPCAT
95:Fayenatic
75:talk page
2533:or in a
2411:or in a
2383:or in a
2313:WP:CIVIL
2201:Lagrange
2165:Lagrange
2117:Lagrange
2059:or in a
2031:or in a
1935:or in a
1907:or in a
1724:or in a
1696:or in a
1480:or in a
1452:or in a
1373:Comment:
1281:or in a
1253:or in a
1232:satusuro
924:or in a
896:or in a
679:or in a
651:or in a
77:or in a
20: |
2134:example
2006:Support
1851:Upmerge
1822:Lugnuts
1801:DonIago
1774:history
1596:db-test
1533:history
1385:Wbm1058
1327:history
1228:Support
1207:Support
1009:Support
792:Comment
722:history
130:history
2489:Delete
2476:DexDor
2472:Rename
2287:DexDor
2178:Delete
2143:DexDor
2130:Delete
2073:rename
1978:Rename
1949:rename
1832:Delete
1816:Delete
1666:Delete
1649:Delete
1631:Delete
1615:Delete
1582:DexDor
1559:Delete
1494:delete
1417:Delete
1400:Delete
1358:DexDor
1295:Delete
1182:crewer
1140:crewer
1097:DexDor
1070:Delete
994:DexDor
938:rename
845:Delete
599:Delete
378:Serten
357:Serten
333:Serten
316:Obsidi
282:Hmains
254:Oppose
237:Oppose
222:Serten
200:Delete
185:Serten
165:WP:COP
2457:JDDJS
2087:ondon
1996:ondon
1886:ondon
1782:watch
1778:links
1563:Sionk
1541:watch
1537:links
1508:ondon
1335:watch
1331:links
1170:Done.
968:ondon
862:Merge
730:watch
726:links
138:watch
134:links
105:ondon
46:: -->
16:<
2498:talk
2480:talk
2461:talk
2361:talk
2336:talk
2321:talk
2291:talk
2261:talk
2255:. --
2240:talk
2223:talk
2186:talk
2147:talk
2075:. –
1863:talk
1843:Talk
1834:per
1805:talk
1786:logs
1770:talk
1766:edit
1742:and
1674:talk
1657:talk
1640:talk
1604:talk
1586:talk
1567:talk
1545:logs
1529:talk
1525:edit
1496:. –
1430:Бøяg
1423:. --
1389:talk
1375:See
1362:talk
1339:logs
1323:talk
1319:edit
1219:talk
1177:brew
1158:talk
1135:brew
1115:talk
1101:talk
1079:talk
1055:talk
1034:talk
998:talk
956:. –
952:and
874:talk
853:talk
812:talk
798:and
752:and
734:logs
718:talk
714:edit
627:talk
608:talk
589:talk
577:This
361:talk
342:talk
320:talk
312:keep
303:talk
286:talk
276:and
245:talk
226:talk
208:talk
189:talk
171:and
142:logs
126:talk
122:edit
35:<
2512:SFB
2443:to
2315:, —
2285:".
2204:613
2168:613
2120:613
2100:to
2010:SFB
1966:to
1857:.
1623:SFB
1621:).
1426:DŃŤŃŹ
1409:SFB
1014:SFB
981:to
940:to
864:to
557:not
507:not
472:not
449:not
278:SFB
262:SFB
167:,
22:Log
2500:)
2482:)
2463:)
2428:.
2426:it
2363:)
2338:)
2323:)
2293:)
2263:)
2242:)
2225:)
2188:)
2149:)
2115:.
1951:.
1865:)
1807:)
1784:|
1780:|
1776:|
1772:|
1768:|
1747:.
1676:)
1659:)
1642:)
1606:)
1588:)
1569:)
1543:|
1539:|
1535:|
1531:|
1527:|
1407:.
1391:)
1364:)
1337:|
1333:|
1329:|
1325:|
1321:|
1297:.
1221:)
1173:--
1160:)
1117:)
1103:)
1095:.
1081:)
1057:)
1036:)
1000:)
948:,
876:)
855:)
814:)
732:|
728:|
724:|
720:|
716:|
695:.
629:)
610:)
591:)
380:,
363:)
350:@
344:)
322:)
305:)
288:)
247:)
228:)
210:)
191:)
140:|
136:|
132:|
128:|
124:|
2496:(
2478:(
2459:(
2359:(
2334:(
2319:(
2289:(
2259:(
2238:(
2221:(
2184:(
2145:(
2082:L
1991:L
1881:L
1861:(
1841:|
1803:(
1788:)
1764:(
1672:(
1655:(
1638:(
1602:(
1584:(
1565:(
1547:)
1523:(
1503:L
1428:-
1387:(
1360:(
1341:)
1317:(
1217:(
1156:(
1113:(
1099:(
1077:(
1053:(
1032:(
996:(
963:L
872:(
851:(
810:(
756:.
736:)
712:(
625:(
606:(
587:(
392::
359:(
340:(
318:(
301:(
284:(
243:(
224:(
206:(
187:(
144:)
120:(
100:L
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.