473:
177:, but the main objection seemed to be that species should not be categorised simply as "introduced/invasive species" without specifying the location. As it was subsequently re-created with sub-cats by location, I am therefore raising this CfD seeking a decision to authorise the un-deletion, with limitations on usage. –
215:
It seems to me that FL has misread the 2007 CFD. There was indeed a consensus that categorising species merely as "introduced" was a bit silly, because so many species have been introduced somewhere. However, FL seems to be reading this as a consensus that it would have been ok if sub-categorised
503:, all member pages are recent recipients of the re-created Order rather than recipients of the historical Order following the time of Queen Tamar. It was the recent re-creation which was the main reason for counting the award as non-notable in the AfD. –
97:, it is not necessary to view a CfD from 2007 as legislation. What we have instead is a category created, populated, used and not facing even a nomination for deletion. Therefore, the prevailing consensus is that the category remains. -
293:) - not articles about species that may mention that the species has been introduced somewhere. The current category inclusion criteria appear to be trying to say that, but could probably be improved (perhaps with some examples), but
93:. There is no need, nor authority, for CfD to 'authorise' the creation of a category. The passage of seven years since the original CfD and five years since the creation of this version of the category page means that, since
216:
by location; but I don't see any support for that idea. If it had been proposed, I am sure that somebody would have pointed to the horrendous category clutter it would have caused, and on those grounds I oppose it now.
322:
DexDor makes a good point, and in what category would we put the various lists envisioned by BHG? But the name of this category invites the categorization of the species themselves. Perhaps a rename along the lines of
451:
443:
226:. That still seems to be the best approach, because many species have been introduced or invaded so many countries that the lost of invaded countries could be enormous. Consider for example
434:
298:
202:
166:
42:
37:
219:
210:
174:
301:); attempting to do the whole lot in one go would make it more difficult to separate out the few articles that should remain in this category. A category rename (e.g. to "
286:
278:
21:
508:
182:
17:
415:
264:
328:
242:. There would be massive clutter if it was categorised by country; once we get down to sub-national level, the clutter would be horrendous.
223:
476:
saw the deletion of the related article, and even if it were notable, it probably still wouldn't be enough for this category to be valid.
235:
231:
324:
127:
239:
282:
297:
as per this CFD nomination. My plan has been to tackle this tree branch-by-branch (e.g. following the saltwater fish CFD -
277:
These categories should be restricted to articles specifically about introductions and their effects (e.g. articles like
474:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/The Order of the Eagle of
Georgia and the Seamless Tunic of Our Lord Jesus Christ
554:
534:
517:
493:
420:
388:
360:
340:
314:
269:
191:
105:
78:
170:
118:
514:
188:
530:
411:
260:
206:
135:
336:
525:
This is not a defining award. Awards need to be a lot more than notable for us to have categories for winners.
305:" or something a bit shorter) might help to clarify that this should be a topic category, not a set category.
252:. Those are enough to start list categories, which could be expanded by listifying the existing categories. --
290:
550:
504:
488:
435:
Category:Recipients of the Order of the Eagle of
Georgia and the Seamless Tunic of Our Lord Jesus Christ
384:
370:
Category:Recipients of the Order of the Eagle of
Georgia and the Seamless Tunic of Our Lord Jesus Christ
356:
178:
74:
526:
404:
253:
477:
332:
549:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
355:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
227:
383:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
310:
102:
94:
222:
there was strong support for presenting this data in lists, which should be grouped in a
175:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories_for_discussion/Log/2007_May_23#Category:Introduced_Species
161:, so that species should only be categorised by region/country within this tree; and
159:
Restrict non-geographical categories in this tree for use as container categories
306:
98:
303:
Human-facilitated introduction of animals to regions where they are not native
377:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
234:, distributed in every continent (see the "distribution" tab in its
543:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
349:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
459:
455:
447:
439:
249:
245:
143:
139:
131:
123:
557:). No further edits should be made to this section.
391:). No further edits should be made to this section.
363:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
209:. That's when I saw that I had also closed the
325:Category:Consequences of species introduction
167:January_17#Category:Introduced saltwater fish
8:
236:listing at the Invasive Species Compendium
240:Category:Invasive plant species in Oregon
18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
230:(Janaese knotweed), one of the world's
7:
329:Category:Lists of introduced species
224:Category:Lists of introduced species
28:
398:The result of the discussion was:
238:), yet we find it categorised in
169:. There was a decision to delete
88:The result of the discussion was:
232:100 most invasive plant species
205:, which prompted FL to open a
1:
250:8 lists of introduced species
30:
535:21:32, 30 January 2014 (UTC)
518:18:45, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
494:14:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
421:22:52, 2 February 2014 (UTC)
341:07:05, 31 January 2014 (UTC)
315:20:43, 27 January 2014 (UTC)
270:22:56, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
246:12 lists of invasive species
192:17:31, 26 January 2014 (UTC)
106:23:22, 4 February 2014 (UTC)
327:and another for pure lists
171:Category:Introduced species
119:Category:Introduced species
60:Category:Introduced species
574:
165:those recently deleted at
546:Please do not modify it.
380:Please do not modify it.
352:Please do not modify it.
70:Please do not modify it.
471:Nominator's rationale:
199:Delete and listify all
156:Nominator's rationale:
207:discussion on my talk
490:(tell Luke off here)
95:consensus can change
220:May 2007 discussion
211:May 2007 discussion
115:Propose restricting
275:Oppose nomination.
244:There are already
527:John Pack Lambert
419:
268:
228:Fallopia japonica
51:
50:
565:
548:
511:
486:
483:
480:
464:
463:
431:Propose deleting
410:
407:
382:
354:
259:
256:
185:
148:
147:
72:
47:
36:
31:
573:
572:
568:
567:
566:
564:
563:
562:
561:
555:deletion review
544:
509:
484:
481:
478:
437:
433:
405:
389:deletion review
378:
372:
367:
361:deletion review
350:
254:
201:. I closed the
183:
121:
117:
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
571:
569:
560:
559:
539:
538:
537:
520:
497:
496:
468:
467:
466:
465:
425:
424:
423:
394:
393:
373:
371:
368:
366:
365:
345:
344:
343:
333:Carlossuarez46
317:
272:
243:
217:
214:
203:January 17 CFD
195:
194:
153:
152:
151:
150:
109:
108:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
570:
558:
556:
552:
547:
541:
540:
536:
532:
528:
524:
521:
519:
516:
513:
512:
506:
502:
499:
498:
495:
492:
491:
487:
475:
472:
469:
461:
457:
453:
449:
445:
441:
436:
432:
429:
428:
427:
426:
422:
417:
413:
409:
402:
399:
396:
395:
392:
390:
386:
381:
375:
374:
369:
364:
362:
358:
353:
347:
346:
342:
338:
334:
330:
326:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
304:
300:
296:
292:
288:
284:
280:
276:
273:
271:
266:
262:
258:
251:
247:
241:
237:
233:
229:
225:
221:
212:
208:
204:
200:
197:
196:
193:
190:
187:
186:
180:
176:
172:
168:
164:
160:
157:
154:
145:
141:
137:
133:
129:
125:
120:
116:
113:
112:
111:
110:
107:
104:
100:
96:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
41:
39:
33:
32:
23:
19:
545:
542:
522:
507:
500:
489:
470:
430:
400:
397:
379:
376:
351:
348:
319:
302:
294:
274:
198:
181:
162:
158:
155:
149:and sub-cats
114:
90:
87:
69:
66:
408:HairedGirl
257:HairedGirl
55:January 26
43:January 27
38:January 25
551:talk page
505:Fayenatic
385:talk page
357:talk page
179:Fayenatic
163:reinstate
91:NO ACTION
75:talk page
553:or in a
416:contribs
387:or in a
359:or in a
299:this CFD
265:contribs
77:or in a
20: |
448:history
320:Comment
218:In the
132:history
523:Delete
501:Delete
412:(talk)
401:delete
307:DexDor
261:(talk)
99:Splash
515:ondon
456:watch
452:links
406:Brown
255:Brown
189:ondon
140:watch
136:links
46:: -->
16:<
531:talk
479:Luke
460:logs
444:talk
440:edit
403:. --
337:talk
311:talk
291:this
289:and
287:this
283:this
279:this
248:and
144:logs
128:talk
124:edit
35:<
414:• (
295:not
263:• (
173:at
22:Log
533:)
485:94
482:no
458:|
454:|
450:|
446:|
442:|
339:)
331:.
313:)
285:,
281:,
142:|
138:|
134:|
130:|
126:|
103:tk
101:-
529:(
510:L
462:)
438:(
418:)
335:(
309:(
267:)
213:.
184:L
146:)
122:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.