Knowledge (XXG)

:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 October 11 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

757:
rare cases) have much to do with the individuals future career, most Former Redcoats within WP have gone on to do comparable jobs to a far more notable level. However the fact that there is a wealth of reliable secondary sources for each of these individuals identifying them as Redcoats is proof in itself how notable the job and the people who do it are to the British Public - even if that notability is not understood or accepted internationally. I agree with the idea that being a Redcoat can be a gateway, however I disagree profusely with the idea that it is
1549:- Might be useful if this was restricted to other Wikimedia sites (such as commons, Wikibooks, etc.), but the lone user in this category appears to be a bureaucrat on a completely unrelated Wiki. Nothing to stop someone from creating their own wiki, promoting themselves to bureaucrat, and then joining this category. Thus, it isn't particularly useful for any purpose I can think of for improving the encyclopedia. 960:
be easy to dismiss them as biased - these are articles about the notable individual's life and they still define the individual by this former profession. I have made this argument since the start, yet you choose to dismiss me as not understanding this distinction, this Job is a notable one in UK culture and because of that we do define those who have carried out the job by it.
409:. I don't find the floating adjective problematic in a title, and I like keeping category names short. The addition of the word "topics" seems to me to add no clarification to the reader, so the extra verbiage just creates clutter in the category list of articles. However, if the rename does go ahead, please re-create the existing title as a redirect. -- 2476:. I believe this is a defining characteristic of these songs since in the minds of the audience this fact will always be closely associated with the tune, and emotions and associations are very significant aspects when it comes to music. I'm more uncertain about the option of listifying though, but for now I'm voting simply to keep. __ 959:
here, not sources that make an offhand trivial comment about the person's past or biography and 7 of these are clearly reliable sources that define these individuals by their former profession. For the sake of argument I haven't even included articles which directly relate to Butlins because it would
861:
This is not about categorisation by any factoid, it is about categorisation by notable profession, and these individuals are regularly cited as notably having been in that profession. The level of notability is high enough that a decent Head Article could probably be written from it though reasonably
2813:
But many songs are specially created and launched to catch that market that don't reach number one, and songs that aren't created to catch that market can still reach number one. Thus, there is nothing specifically defining about a Christmas number one. If it is defining to some, it's definitely not
2734:
per Philip Stevens, this is a defining characteristic of many if not all of these songs. In recent years particularly with the XFactor dominating the number 1 spot the second and third spot have become more notable per ONaNcle (though no1's before this such as "Mad World" were equally contentious.);
2514:
though I wish we were delivered from having these churned out as musAc in all the shops just before Christmas. The alternative might be to regard this as an award catefgory, which we should listify and delete. One characteristic is that they are Christmas-related and normally drop out of the chart
884:
the person is notable? In this case, I cannot but conclude that it is not. If it's notable, then write an article and include them in the list. But unless it's defining for those included, we don't create a category for it. It sounds like there's a basic misunderstanding of this point. No commenters
829:
This category provides interesting common trait of the individuals listed in it. Whether or not these individuals are notable because of having been a Redcoat doesn't, to my mind, have any bearing on whether this category should exist. (The argument about alumni categories seems pertinent--in some
727:
I think that's a good argument for including the details of someone having this job in their bio article on WP, but not one for having a category for it. Many things are verifiable and possibly even notable and influential, but categories are generally used for features that are central and defining
756:
Would you then consider all University Alumni Categories requiring deletion, or does the fact that the individual attends a notable college whose notability is relevant to their own notability make it a reasonable keep? Whilst Former Lifeguard and U.S. Senate Pages do not (except in exceptionally
2773:
I don't know about elsewhere, but in the UK the singles market rises hugely at Christmas, & a large number of these were specially created & launched to catch that market. There's no "just happen" about it. Quite a large number are specifically Christmas-related, & many others are
704:
but anyone who draws on previous experience such as stand up comedy will often notably raise their previous career as a redcoat. Equally these individuals are regularly cited in the press every time Redcoats and/or Butlins is discussed and uses them to define the role. Sometimes sources will
894:
One defining trait per WP:CAT is "notable profession", which has been my argument all along. It is defining as I have already demonstrated, these individuals are regularly defined by this notable former profession even when they may have done something more notable in their later life i.e;
254: 223: 2717:
So because I'm a Canadian national, I can't be interesting in anything in WP that has to do with "European matters"? Slightly provincial, no? But then again, I guess so too is "Christmas number-two singles in the UK", so it makes sense.
2493:– not sure about this - in the UK it used to be whatever happened to be #1 but these days it is Simon Cowell's choice (or anti-SC choice). Either way, it is now a big and highly publicised deal. (Eg is this a defining characteristic of 2187:(i.e. changed "former" to formerly") to avoid confusion with defunct companies. This category should classify companies that have now been privatized. If they are also defunct that should thus be categorized independently. __ 2665:;-))) How someone like you living in Canada keeps worrying about an entry about European matters??? I've been curious to follow end-November and December charts since the Beatles years to know who will get in the 2453:. I realize that there is some honor to having the number-one song in UK at Christmas, but that is a non-defining characteristic of the song. They just happen to be #1 at this time of year. I think the list at 1812: 1737: 2533:
These aren't Christmas-related songs, but pop songs that just happen to be number one over the Christmas holiday in the UK. I think the list for this case is great, but defining to each song? I don't see it.
1296: 2422: 851:
It doesn't? So it's OK for categories to exist that categorizes by any factoid about a person, as long as it is true and, as you put it, subjectively "interesting"? This seems highly problematic to me.
2555:. This is notable, but not defining. The comments above seem to me to be more appropriate for a discussion of whether such a list would exist, not whether we should categorize based on this feature. 1978:
per standard naming conventions of Wikiproject categories (personally I slightly prefer "Wikiproject Table Tennis participants, but the userbox says members, so thought it best to stick with that).
2567:
per meco. It is often defining, as news articles talking about a given song often say "it was a Christmas No. 1 in...". In other words, the song is defined by the fact it was a Christmas No. 1. --
1672:- Linked to a userbox stating "This user is proud of the Islamic Republic of Iran". Does not help Knowledge (XXG) to categorize users who are proud of particular countries; no encyclopedic value. 2413: 2041: 679: 42: 37: 2139:
I nominate these categories for renaming. I'm not enough of an expert in English to be sure that what I am proposing is the correct solution, so I'm hoping for corrections if warranted. __
1426:, so keeping this would allow a "who contribute to" category for every other non-notable Wiki out there. Since there is no article on this, it can't possibly facilitate collaboration. 2258: 675: 812:
per Stuart.Jamieson. Being a former Redcoat indicates the sort of entertainer they are and indicates the influence of Butlins within the British entertainment industry.
2132: 266: 265:. Spell out the meaning of this category. Many readers will not know what "DOM-TOM" refers to. The proposed name conforms with the name format of the article 1528: 849:"Whether or not these individuals are notable because of having been a Redcoat doesn't, to my mind, have any bearing on whether this category should exist." 2430: 1770: 2208: 21: 1790: 1520: 2694: 2454: 1762: 2262: 2234: 1511: 1401: 1753: 2083: 2698: 2632: 1393: 2230: 2079: 17: 2819: 2706: 2539: 2462: 2184: 2074: 453: 421: 2180: 2158: 2128: 2124: 1110: 2179:. I have modified the proposed name of one of the categories to counter an ambiguity which I just realized. Instead of its new name being 1384: 947: 2070: 880:
The standard for categorization is not notability. It is whether or not the trait is defining. In other words, is that trait one of the
2101: 2457:
is the best way to identify these songs and, as they are already number ones in the UK, this seems to be overcategorization as well.
2092: 2136: 2097: 2065: 1266: 1062: 953: 123: 92: 2120: 2110: 2088: 1274: 1070: 2061: 1090:
Category only contains, and will only ever contain, one member. I think the relevant guidelines are WP:OC#NARROW and WP:OC#SMALL.
2106: 2494: 2211:
which I agree is ambiguous. I'm not sure about 'Formerly municipally owned' as it appears to be overly adverbed. Ex-municipal?
1974: 1912: 1257: 1053: 696:
you can't refer to it as a gateway job because it may be notable in their future careers - The most obvious example of this is
2736: 1833: 1159: 528: 160: 119: 88: 635: 955:
Do I really need to go on providing sources that show how often notable people are defined as former Redcoats, and I mean
477: 2301:
I did consider in v of and was unsure. If the basic approach is accepted, others can decide which is the better choice.
1114: 831: 2841: 2823: 2804: 2783: 2765: 2748: 2722: 2710: 2678: 2653: 2644: 2623: 2603: 2576: 2559: 2543: 2524: 2506: 2485: 2466: 2407: 2382: 2358: 2341: 2310: 2296: 2274: 2246: 2220: 2196: 2170: 2148: 2054: 2027: 2003: 1987: 1929: 1894: 1870: 1852: 1838: 1803: 1747: 1721: 1697: 1681: 1626: 1598: 1574: 1558: 1503: 1475: 1451: 1435: 1376: 1348: 1324: 1308: 1249: 1221: 1197: 1181: 1164: 1143: 1126: 1099: 1045: 1017: 993: 969: 889: 875: 856: 843: 821: 803: 779: 770: 751: 722: 686: 643: 618: 590: 566: 550: 533: 505: 483: 458: 426: 399: 360: 332: 308: 292: 273: 240: 205: 181: 165: 142: 109: 74: 2815: 2702: 2619: 2535: 2458: 674:
they were a Butlins Redcoat. It's more of an interesting factoid about a previous job held by a person, somewhat like
626: 391: 1946: 2744: 965: 871: 799: 766: 718: 449: 417: 2840:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2357:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2002:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1937: 1908: 1869:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1696:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1573:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1450:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1323:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1196:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
992:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
565:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
307:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
180:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2572: 2381:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
2026:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1954: 1893:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1720:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1643: 1597:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1474:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1347:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1220:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
1016:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
746:"Becoming a Redcoat is seen as a way into show business, although this is less prevalent in more recent years." 589:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
331:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
204:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a
250: 219: 2520: 1819: 395: 2615: 1634: 908: 905: 706: 374: 911: 432: 2599: 2337: 2306: 2270: 2050: 1122: 932: 2614:. As currently defined -- songs that just happen to be #1 on Dec. 25 -- it's trivial and non-defining. 1651: 941: 2279:
It doesn't have a wonderful sound to it, but it is very straightforward. I'm wondering though whether
2740: 1744: 961: 867: 795: 762: 714: 670:. This is kind of a gateway job into the entertainment business, but I don't think anyone is notable 442: 410: 2761: 2719: 2650: 2568: 2556: 1423: 886: 853: 776: 748: 710: 683: 502: 370: 270: 139: 2586: 2324: 736:
they were Butlins Redcoats. They are notable for some other reason. The job itself most certainly
493: 2800: 2791:: for many of the songs listed (those of Slade, Cliff Richard, etc., maybe even Mr Blobby), this 2516: 2405: 1983: 1848: 1831: 1799: 1677: 1554: 1431: 1304: 1157: 1095: 935: 863: 839: 741: 667: 526: 158: 541:
Nominator is nominally correct, but I don't see a significant issue with it remaining as is. __
2779: 2674: 2640: 1139: 938: 926: 917: 473: 288: 899: 2595: 2502: 2333: 2302: 2266: 2216: 2166: 2046: 1177: 1118: 1295:- "Wikipedians by individual" category, which have a unanimous precedent for deletion (see 1741: 817: 387: 2757: 2481: 2292: 2242: 2192: 2144: 914: 546: 2796: 2398: 1979: 1844: 1826: 1795: 1673: 1550: 1427: 1300: 1152: 1091: 950: 896: 835: 521: 153: 923: 830:
ways, these individuals are "alumni" of Butlins--although I expect someone will cry
2775: 2670: 2636: 2121:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Manual of Style#Category names with hyphens misused after "ly"
1135: 902: 791: 468: 284: 135: 2795:
an important defining characteristic. (At least, it was when I was young...) --
2498: 2212: 2162: 1173: 920: 697: 255:
Category:Political parties in the overseas departments and territories of France
224:
Category:Political parties in the overseas departments and territories of France
1918: 1615: 1492: 1365: 1238: 1034: 944: 813: 607: 383: 349: 229: 98: 2589:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
2327:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
496:
to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
2477: 2288: 2238: 2229:"Ex-municipal" sounds bad is my immediate reaction. Other possibilities are 2188: 2140: 701: 542: 2375:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2257:
How about considering an approach that might address both problems? Would
2020:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1887:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1714:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1591:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1468:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1341:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1214:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1010:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
583:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
325:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
198:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2756:. It is peculiar, but UK Christmas #1 single is notable and defining. -- 705:
similarly identify the individuals redcoat status as notable for instance
929: 1794:
per standard naming conventions of using "Wikipedians" and not "Users".
885:
in this discussion have exhibited an understanding of the distinction.
713:
specifically identifies him by the term "the former Butlins Redcoat".
866:
would cover it with a re-writing of the Notable Redcoats section.
1813:
Category:Wikipedians using the service awards template incorrectly
1738:
Category:Wikipedians using the service awards template incorrectly
1791:
Category:Wikipedians using the service award template incorrectly
517: 2263:
Category:Companies formerly owned by municipalities of England
2235:
Category:Companies of Norway formerly owned by municipalities
2042:
Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2010 October 23
1512:
Category:Wikipedians who are Bureaucrats on other wiki sites
1461:
Category:Wikipedians who are Bureaucrats on other wiki sites
2414:
Category:Christmas number-one singles in the United Kingdom
2368:
Category:Christmas number-one singles in the United Kingdom
1754:
Category:Users using the service award template incorrectly
1707:
Category:Users using the service award template incorrectly
2084:
Category:Municipally owned companies of the United Kingdom
2834:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2351:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1996:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1863:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1690:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1567:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1444:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1317:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1190:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
986:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
666:. These people are not notable for reason of having been 559:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
301:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
174:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2631:
per Peterkingiron ; it could also be renamed to include
2231:
Category:Formerly municipality-owned companies of Norway
2080:
Category:Municipal owned companies of the United Kingdom
2438: 2434: 2426: 2418: 2185:
Category:Formerly municipally owned companies of Norway
2075:
Category:Formerly municipally owned companies of Norway
1962: 1958: 1950: 1942: 1778: 1774: 1766: 1758: 1659: 1655: 1647: 1639: 1536: 1532: 1524: 1516: 1409: 1405: 1397: 1389: 1282: 1278: 1270: 1262: 1078: 1074: 1066: 1058: 651: 647: 639: 631: 439:. This should really have been done by the nominator :( 436: 2739:
and retain. The list remains for the number 1 spot.
2259:
Category:Companies owned by municipalities of England
2181:
Category:Former municipally owned companies of Norway
728:
for a person. The fact remains that these people are
1385:
Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Catholic Wiki
1334:
Category:Wikipedians who contribute to Catholic Wiki
740:
be said to be a kind of gateway job, as the article
2844:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2774:"novelty" songs that do well at this time of year. 2594:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 2385:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2361:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2332:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 2071:
Category:Former municipal owned companies of Norway
2030:). No further edits should be made to this section. 2006:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1897:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1873:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1724:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1700:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1601:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1577:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1478:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1454:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1351:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1327:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1224:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1200:). No further edits should be made to this section. 1020:). No further edits should be made to this section. 996:). No further edits should be made to this section. 593:). No further edits should be made to this section. 569:). No further edits should be made to this section. 501:Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 335:). No further edits should be made to this section. 311:). No further edits should be made to this section. 208:). No further edits should be made to this section. 184:). No further edits should be made to this section. 77:). No further edits should be made to this section. 775:Yes, I would. It's an argument I've long pursued. 2102:Category:Municipally owned companies of Scotland 794:has been notified of this discussion by myself. 2669:and it remains so important forty years later-- 2093:Category:Municipally owned companies of England 134:. Suggest renaming to match article for party, 2207:– this is part of a wider problem as there is 2137:Category:Municipally owned companies in Canada 2133:Category:Municipally-owned companies of Canada 2098:Category:Municipal owned companies of Scotland 2066:Category:Municipally owned companies of Norway 761:a gateway having little notability otherwise. 267:Overseas departments and territories of France 2111:Category:Municipally owned companies of Wales 2089:Category:Municipal owned companies of England 8: 2515:completely immediately after the festival. 2062:Category:Municipal owned companies of Norway 2107:Category:Municipal owned companies of Wales 1815:per VegaDark and because templates name is 2209:Category:Former government-owned companies 516:as the parent article of this category is 2695:List of Christmas number one singles (UK) 2455:List of Christmas number one singles (UK) 1975:Category:WikiProject Table Tennis members 1913:Category:WikiProject Table Tennis members 1258:Category:Wikipedians who like Mr. Trololo 1207:Category:Wikipedians who like Mr. Trololo 1054:Category:Defunct airlines of East Germany 1003:Category:Defunct airlines of East Germany 382:Instead of having a floating adjective. — 18:Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion 2737:Category:Christmas hit singles in the UK 2497:? It probably is, regrettably perhaps.) 120:Category:Wales Labour Party politicians 89:Category:Wales Labour Party politicians 60:Category:Wales Labour Party politicians 2699:Christmas number-two singles in the UK 2633:Christmas number-two singles in the UK 2735:for this reason consider renaming to 7: 2159:Category:Municipally owned companies 2129:Category:Municipally owned companies 2125:Category:Municipally-owned companies 1111:Category:Defunct airlines by country 1115:Category:Airlines of defunct states 1973:Nominator's rationale - Rename to 1789:Nominator's rationale - Rename to 28: 2392:The result of the discussion was: 2287:would be the best preposition. __ 2037:The result of the discussion was: 1904:The result of the discussion was: 1731:The result of the discussion was: 1608:The result of the discussion was: 1485:The result of the discussion was: 1358:The result of the discussion was: 1231:The result of the discussion was: 1027:The result of the discussion was: 600:The result of the discussion was: 342:The result of the discussion was: 215:The result of the discussion was: 124:Category:Welsh Labour politicians 93:Category:Welsh Labour politicians 84:The result of the discussion was: 2119:With reference to discussion at 627:Category:Former Butlins Redcoats 576:Category:Former Butlins Redcoats 2495:Hallelujah (Leonard Cohen song) 2701:much more helpful for that? -- 2525:18:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 2507:09:16, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2486:08:07, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2467:06:18, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2311:21:38, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2297:18:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2275:18:47, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2247:12:39, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2221:12:26, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2197:10:31, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2171:08:56, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 2149:08:02, 27 September 2010 (UTC) 1670:Nominator's rationale - Delete 1547:Nominator's rationale - Delete 1420:Nominator's rationale - Delete 1293:Nominator's rationale - Delete 484:15:57, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 459:10:06, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 427:09:55, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 400:08:28, 30 September 2010 (UTC) 1: 2117:Nominator's nationale: Rename 30: 2824:00:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 2805:04:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 2784:03:15, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 2766:22:44, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 2749:21:04, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 2723:21:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2711:17:23, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2679:14:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2654:10:41, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2645:05:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2624:05:32, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2604:00:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2577:05:36, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2408:02:09, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 2342:00:37, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 2055:15:31, 23 October 2010 (UTC) 1988:01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1930:16:46, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1853:19:09, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 1839:12:39, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1804:01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1748:21:04, 18 October 2010 (UTC) 1682:01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1627:16:50, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1559:01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1504:16:49, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1436:01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1377:16:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1309:01:15, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1250:16:48, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 1182:02:26, 15 October 2010 (UTC) 1165:01:28, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 1144:20:08, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1127:19:55, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1100:17:02, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 1046:16:45, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 970:08:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 890:00:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 876:23:02, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 857:21:34, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 844:03:58, 17 October 2010 (UTC) 822:14:47, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 804:10:41, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 780:22:38, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 771:22:24, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 752:21:51, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 723:21:45, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 687:20:58, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 619:16:51, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 551:10:26, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 534:01:27, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 506:21:31, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 361:16:54, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 293:03:10, 14 October 2010 (UTC) 274:23:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 241:16:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 166:01:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC) 143:23:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC) 110:16:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC) 2816:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 2703:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 2560:05:53, 4 October 2010 (UTC) 2544:19:51, 1 October 2010 (UTC) 2536:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 2459:Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars 2265:be an acceptable approach? 2123:and the recent renaming of 2013:Municipally owned companies 1172:as part of several series 834:at me for saying that.) -- 2861: 1938:Category:User Table Tennis 1909:Category:User Table Tennis 1880:Category:User Table Tennis 152:to match parent article. 2837:Please do not modify it. 2378:Please do not modify it. 2354:Please do not modify it. 2023:Please do not modify it. 1999:Please do not modify it. 1890:Please do not modify it. 1866:Please do not modify it. 1717:Please do not modify it. 1693:Please do not modify it. 1594:Please do not modify it. 1570:Please do not modify it. 1471:Please do not modify it. 1447:Please do not modify it. 1344:Please do not modify it. 1320:Please do not modify it. 1217:Please do not modify it. 1193:Please do not modify it. 1013:Please do not modify it. 989:Please do not modify it. 586:Please do not modify it. 562:Please do not modify it. 328:Please do not modify it. 304:Please do not modify it. 251:Category:DOM-TOM Parties 220:Category:DOM-TOM Parties 201:Please do not modify it. 191:Category:DOM-TOM Parties 177:Please do not modify it. 70:Please do not modify it. 1109:. Part of two series, 2667:top three at Christmas 2448:Nominator's rationale: 1843:No objection to that. 1088:Nominator's rationale: 909:Russ_Hamilton_(singer) 661:Nominator's rationale: 380:Nominator's rationale: 260:Nominator's rationale: 129:Nominator's rationale: 933:Dave Allen (comedian) 2814:defining for all. -- 2649:You must be joking? 2157:– to harmonise with 1635:Category:User IRIRAN 1584:Category:User IRIRAN 375:Category:LGBT topics 832:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS 711:Ian Watkins (Steps) 864:Redcoats (Butlins) 742:Redcoats (Butlins) 2693:Aren't the lists 2616:Shawn in Montreal 2606: 2344: 1151:per Vegaswikian. 1134:per vegaswikian-- 939:Michael Barrymore 927:William G Stewart 806: 680:former lifeguards 676:U.S. Senate pages 508: 481: 457: 440: 425: 51: 50: 2852: 2839: 2593: 2591: 2443: 2442: 2403: 2380: 2356: 2331: 2329: 2183:I have proposed 2025: 2001: 1967: 1966: 1926: 1925: 1922: 1892: 1868: 1829: 1824: 1818: 1783: 1782: 1719: 1695: 1664: 1663: 1623: 1622: 1619: 1596: 1572: 1541: 1540: 1500: 1499: 1496: 1473: 1449: 1422:- No article on 1414: 1413: 1373: 1372: 1369: 1346: 1322: 1287: 1286: 1246: 1245: 1242: 1219: 1195: 1155: 1083: 1082: 1042: 1041: 1038: 1015: 991: 790: 668:Butlins Redcoats 656: 655: 615: 614: 611: 588: 564: 524: 500: 498: 482: 471: 448: 445: 431: 416: 413: 368:Propose renaming 357: 356: 353: 330: 306: 248:Propose renaming 237: 236: 233: 203: 179: 156: 117:Propose renaming 106: 105: 102: 72: 47: 36: 31: 2860: 2859: 2855: 2854: 2853: 2851: 2850: 2849: 2848: 2842:deletion review 2835: 2741:Stuart.Jamieson 2720:Good Ol’factory 2651:Good Ol’factory 2584: 2557:Good Ol’factory 2416: 2412: 2399: 2383:deletion review 2376: 2370: 2365: 2359:deletion review 2352: 2322: 2040:Relisting, see 2028:deletion review 2021: 2015: 2010: 2004:deletion review 1997: 1940: 1936: 1923: 1920: 1919: 1895:deletion review 1888: 1882: 1877: 1871:deletion review 1864: 1836: 1827: 1822: 1816: 1756: 1752: 1722:deletion review 1715: 1709: 1704: 1698:deletion review 1691: 1637: 1633: 1620: 1617: 1616: 1599:deletion review 1592: 1586: 1581: 1575:deletion review 1568: 1514: 1510: 1497: 1494: 1493: 1476:deletion review 1469: 1463: 1458: 1452:deletion review 1445: 1387: 1383: 1370: 1367: 1366: 1349:deletion review 1342: 1336: 1331: 1325:deletion review 1318: 1260: 1256: 1243: 1240: 1239: 1222:deletion review 1215: 1209: 1204: 1198:deletion review 1191: 1162: 1153: 1056: 1052: 1039: 1036: 1035: 1018:deletion review 1011: 1005: 1000: 994:deletion review 987: 962:Stuart.Jamieson 887:Good Ol’factory 868:Stuart.Jamieson 854:Good Ol’factory 796:Stuart.Jamieson 777:Good Ol’factory 763:Stuart.Jamieson 749:Good Ol’factory 715:Stuart.Jamieson 709:interview with 684:Good Ol’factory 629: 625: 612: 609: 608: 591:deletion review 584: 578: 573: 567:deletion review 560: 531: 522: 503:Good Ol’factory 491: 467: 443: 411: 354: 351: 350: 333:deletion review 326: 320: 315: 309:deletion review 302: 271:Good Ol’factory 234: 231: 230: 206:deletion review 199: 193: 188: 182:deletion review 175: 163: 154: 140:Good Ol’factory 103: 100: 99: 75:deletion review 68: 62: 57: 52: 45: 34: 26: 25: 24: 12: 11: 5: 2858: 2856: 2847: 2846: 2830: 2829: 2828: 2827: 2826: 2808: 2807: 2786: 2768: 2751: 2728: 2727: 2726: 2725: 2715: 2714: 2713: 2686: 2685: 2684: 2683: 2682: 2681: 2626: 2608: 2607: 2592: 2581: 2580: 2579: 2569:Philip Stevens 2562: 2549: 2548: 2547: 2546: 2528: 2527: 2509: 2488: 2470: 2469: 2445: 2444: 2410: 2388: 2387: 2371: 2369: 2366: 2364: 2363: 2347: 2346: 2345: 2330: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2254: 2253: 2252: 2251: 2250: 2249: 2224: 2223: 2174: 2173: 2114: 2113: 2104: 2095: 2086: 2077: 2068: 2058: 2057: 2033: 2032: 2016: 2014: 2011: 2009: 2008: 1992: 1991: 1990: 1969: 1968: 1933: 1932: 1900: 1899: 1883: 1881: 1878: 1876: 1875: 1859: 1858: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1834: 1820:service awards 1806: 1785: 1784: 1750: 1727: 1726: 1710: 1708: 1705: 1703: 1702: 1686: 1685: 1684: 1666: 1665: 1630: 1629: 1604: 1603: 1587: 1585: 1582: 1580: 1579: 1563: 1562: 1561: 1543: 1542: 1507: 1506: 1481: 1480: 1464: 1462: 1459: 1457: 1456: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1416: 1415: 1380: 1379: 1354: 1353: 1337: 1335: 1332: 1330: 1329: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1289: 1288: 1253: 1252: 1227: 1226: 1210: 1208: 1205: 1203: 1202: 1186: 1185: 1184: 1167: 1160: 1146: 1129: 1103: 1102: 1085: 1084: 1049: 1048: 1023: 1022: 1006: 1004: 1001: 999: 998: 982: 981: 980: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 974: 973: 972: 915:Freddie_Davies 824: 807: 788: 787: 786: 785: 784: 783: 782: 690: 689: 658: 657: 622: 621: 596: 595: 579: 577: 574: 572: 571: 555: 554: 553: 536: 529: 510: 509: 499: 488: 487: 486: 461: 437:notified by me 429: 403: 402: 384:Justin (koavf) 377: 364: 363: 338: 337: 321: 319: 316: 314: 313: 297: 296: 295: 277: 276: 257: 244: 243: 211: 210: 194: 192: 189: 187: 186: 170: 169: 168: 161: 146: 145: 126: 113: 112: 80: 79: 63: 61: 58: 56: 53: 49: 48: 40: 29: 27: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2857: 2845: 2843: 2838: 2832: 2831: 2825: 2821: 2817: 2812: 2811: 2810: 2809: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2794: 2790: 2787: 2785: 2781: 2777: 2772: 2769: 2767: 2763: 2759: 2755: 2752: 2750: 2746: 2742: 2738: 2733: 2730: 2729: 2724: 2721: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2700: 2696: 2692: 2691: 2690: 2689: 2688: 2687: 2680: 2676: 2672: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2657: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2648: 2647: 2646: 2642: 2638: 2634: 2630: 2627: 2625: 2621: 2617: 2613: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2601: 2597: 2590: 2588: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2574: 2570: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2554: 2551: 2550: 2545: 2541: 2537: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2517:Peterkingiron 2513: 2510: 2508: 2504: 2500: 2496: 2492: 2489: 2487: 2483: 2479: 2475: 2472: 2471: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2440: 2436: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2420: 2415: 2411: 2409: 2406: 2404: 2402: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2389: 2386: 2384: 2379: 2373: 2372: 2367: 2362: 2360: 2355: 2349: 2348: 2343: 2339: 2335: 2328: 2326: 2321: 2320: 2312: 2308: 2304: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2294: 2290: 2286: 2282: 2278: 2277: 2276: 2272: 2268: 2264: 2260: 2256: 2255: 2248: 2244: 2240: 2236: 2232: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2225: 2222: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2206: 2203: 2202: 2201: 2200: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2190: 2186: 2182: 2178: 2172: 2168: 2164: 2160: 2156: 2153: 2152: 2151: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2138: 2134: 2130: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2112: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2099: 2096: 2094: 2090: 2087: 2085: 2081: 2078: 2076: 2072: 2069: 2067: 2063: 2060: 2059: 2056: 2052: 2048: 2044: 2043: 2038: 2035: 2034: 2031: 2029: 2024: 2018: 2017: 2012: 2007: 2005: 2000: 1994: 1993: 1989: 1985: 1981: 1977: 1976: 1971: 1970: 1964: 1960: 1956: 1952: 1948: 1944: 1939: 1935: 1934: 1931: 1928: 1927: 1915: 1914: 1910: 1905: 1902: 1901: 1898: 1896: 1891: 1885: 1884: 1879: 1874: 1872: 1867: 1861: 1860: 1854: 1850: 1846: 1842: 1841: 1840: 1837: 1832: 1830: 1821: 1814: 1810: 1807: 1805: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1792: 1787: 1786: 1780: 1776: 1772: 1768: 1764: 1760: 1755: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1743: 1739: 1735: 1732: 1729: 1728: 1725: 1723: 1718: 1712: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1699: 1694: 1688: 1687: 1683: 1679: 1675: 1671: 1668: 1667: 1661: 1657: 1653: 1649: 1645: 1641: 1636: 1632: 1631: 1628: 1625: 1624: 1612: 1609: 1606: 1605: 1602: 1600: 1595: 1589: 1588: 1583: 1578: 1576: 1571: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1556: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1544: 1538: 1534: 1530: 1526: 1522: 1518: 1513: 1509: 1508: 1505: 1502: 1501: 1489: 1486: 1483: 1482: 1479: 1477: 1472: 1466: 1465: 1460: 1455: 1453: 1448: 1442: 1441: 1437: 1433: 1429: 1425: 1424:Catholic Wiki 1421: 1418: 1417: 1411: 1407: 1403: 1399: 1395: 1391: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1378: 1375: 1374: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1352: 1350: 1345: 1339: 1338: 1333: 1328: 1326: 1321: 1315: 1314: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1298: 1294: 1291: 1290: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1268: 1264: 1259: 1255: 1254: 1251: 1248: 1247: 1235: 1232: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1223: 1218: 1212: 1211: 1206: 1201: 1199: 1194: 1188: 1187: 1183: 1179: 1175: 1171: 1168: 1166: 1163: 1158: 1156: 1150: 1147: 1145: 1141: 1137: 1133: 1130: 1128: 1124: 1120: 1116: 1112: 1108: 1105: 1104: 1101: 1097: 1093: 1089: 1086: 1080: 1076: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1060: 1055: 1051: 1050: 1047: 1044: 1043: 1031: 1028: 1025: 1024: 1021: 1019: 1014: 1008: 1007: 1002: 997: 995: 990: 984: 983: 971: 967: 963: 958: 954: 952: 951:Will_Gompertz 948: 946: 942: 940: 936: 934: 930: 928: 924: 922: 918: 916: 912: 910: 906: 904: 900: 898: 897:Shane Ritchie 893: 892: 891: 888: 883: 879: 878: 877: 873: 869: 865: 860: 859: 858: 855: 850: 847: 846: 845: 841: 837: 833: 828: 825: 823: 819: 815: 811: 808: 805: 801: 797: 793: 789: 781: 778: 774: 773: 772: 768: 764: 760: 755: 754: 753: 750: 747: 744:itself says: 743: 739: 735: 731: 726: 725: 724: 720: 716: 712: 708: 703: 699: 695: 692: 691: 688: 685: 681: 677: 673: 669: 665: 662: 659: 653: 649: 645: 641: 637: 633: 628: 624: 623: 620: 617: 616: 604: 601: 598: 597: 594: 592: 587: 581: 580: 575: 570: 568: 563: 557: 556: 552: 548: 544: 540: 537: 535: 532: 527: 525: 519: 515: 512: 511: 507: 504: 497: 495: 490: 489: 485: 479: 475: 470: 465: 462: 460: 455: 451: 447: 438: 434: 430: 428: 423: 419: 415: 408: 405: 404: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 378: 376: 372: 371:Category:LGBT 369: 366: 365: 362: 359: 358: 346: 343: 340: 339: 336: 334: 329: 323: 322: 318:Category:LGBT 317: 312: 310: 305: 299: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 279: 278: 275: 272: 268: 264: 261: 258: 256: 252: 249: 246: 245: 242: 239: 238: 226: 225: 221: 216: 213: 212: 209: 207: 202: 196: 195: 190: 185: 183: 178: 172: 171: 167: 164: 159: 157: 151: 148: 147: 144: 141: 137: 133: 130: 127: 125: 121: 118: 115: 114: 111: 108: 107: 95: 94: 90: 85: 82: 81: 78: 76: 71: 65: 64: 59: 54: 44: 41: 39: 33: 32: 23: 19: 2836: 2833: 2792: 2788: 2770: 2753: 2731: 2666: 2661: 2659: 2628: 2611: 2585: 2564: 2552: 2511: 2490: 2473: 2450: 2447: 2400: 2394: 2391: 2377: 2374: 2353: 2350: 2323: 2284: 2280: 2204: 2176: 2175: 2154: 2116: 2115: 2039: 2036: 2022: 2019: 1998: 1995: 1972: 1917: 1906: 1903: 1889: 1886: 1865: 1862: 1808: 1788: 1733: 1730: 1716: 1713: 1692: 1689: 1669: 1614: 1610: 1607: 1593: 1590: 1569: 1566: 1546: 1491: 1487: 1484: 1470: 1467: 1446: 1443: 1419: 1364: 1360: 1357: 1343: 1340: 1319: 1316: 1292: 1237: 1233: 1230: 1216: 1213: 1192: 1189: 1169: 1148: 1131: 1106: 1087: 1033: 1029: 1026: 1012: 1009: 988: 985: 956: 903:Duncan James 881: 848: 826: 809: 792:Talk:Butlins 758: 745: 737: 733: 729: 693: 671: 663: 660: 606: 602: 599: 585: 582: 561: 558: 538: 513: 492: 463: 406: 379: 367: 348: 345:No Consensus 344: 341: 327: 324: 303: 300: 280: 262: 259: 247: 228: 217: 214: 200: 197: 176: 173: 149: 136:Welsh Labour 131: 128: 116: 97: 86: 83: 69: 66: 2596:Dana boomer 2334:Dana boomer 2303:Vegaswikian 2267:Vegaswikian 2047:Dana boomer 1119:Vegaswikian 921:Johnny Ball 698:Jimmy Perry 407:Weak oppose 2155:Rename all 1745:Od Mishehu 945:Darren Day 700:who wrote 446:HairedGirl 414:HairedGirl 55:October 11 43:October 12 38:October 10 2758:SmokeyJoe 2512:Weak Keep 1742:עוד מישהו 702:Hi-de-Hi! 435:has been 283:per nom. 2797:RFBailey 2660:you the 2587:Relisted 2325:Relisted 1980:VegaDark 1845:VegaDark 1835:Contribs 1828:Armbrust 1796:VegaDark 1674:VegaDark 1551:VegaDark 1428:VegaDark 1301:VegaDark 1161:Contribs 1154:Armbrust 1092:Jan 1922 836:RFBailey 732:notable 530:Contribs 523:Armbrust 494:Relisted 478:contribs 454:contribs 422:contribs 162:Contribs 155:Armbrust 20:‎ | 2776:Johnbod 2671:ONaNcle 2637:ONaNcle 2491:Comment 2427:history 2205:Comment 1951:history 1907:Rename 1767:history 1648:history 1525:history 1398:history 1271:history 1136:ONaNcle 1067:history 882:reasons 734:because 672:because 640:history 539:Neutral 514:Opposer 469:SatyrTN 464:Neutral 433:WT:LGBT 285:Johnbod 218:Rename 150:Support 87:Rename 2732:rename 2612:Delete 2553:Delete 2499:Occuli 2451:Delete 2213:Occuli 2163:Occuli 1809:Rename 1734:Rename 1611:Delete 1488:Delete 1361:Delete 1234:Delete 1174:Hmains 1149:Oppose 957:define 664:Delete 450:(talk) 418:(talk) 281:Rename 263:Rename 132:Rename 2658:It's 2435:watch 2431:links 2161:etc. 1959:watch 1955:links 1916:. -- 1775:watch 1771:links 1656:watch 1652:links 1613:. -- 1533:watch 1529:links 1490:. -- 1406:watch 1402:links 1363:. -- 1279:watch 1275:links 1236:. -- 1075:watch 1071:links 1032:. -- 814:Cjc13 648:watch 644:links 605:. -- 444:Brown 412:Brown 347:. -- 227:. -- 96:. -- 46:: --> 16:< 2820:talk 2801:talk 2789:Keep 2780:talk 2771:Keep 2762:talk 2754:Keep 2745:talk 2707:talk 2697:and 2675:talk 2662:joke 2641:talk 2629:Keep 2620:talk 2600:talk 2573:talk 2565:Keep 2540:talk 2521:talk 2503:talk 2482:talk 2478:meco 2474:Keep 2463:talk 2439:logs 2423:talk 2419:edit 2397:. — 2395:keep 2338:talk 2307:talk 2293:talk 2289:meco 2271:talk 2261:and 2243:talk 2239:meco 2237:. __ 2217:talk 2193:talk 2189:meco 2177:Note 2167:talk 2145:talk 2141:meco 2131:and 2051:talk 1984:talk 1963:logs 1947:talk 1943:edit 1924:damr 1849:talk 1800:talk 1779:logs 1763:talk 1759:edit 1678:talk 1660:logs 1644:talk 1640:edit 1621:damr 1555:talk 1537:logs 1521:talk 1517:edit 1498:damr 1432:talk 1410:logs 1394:talk 1390:edit 1371:damr 1305:talk 1297:here 1283:logs 1267:talk 1263:edit 1244:damr 1178:talk 1170:keep 1140:talk 1132:Keep 1123:talk 1113:and 1107:Keep 1096:talk 1079:logs 1063:talk 1059:edit 1040:damr 1030:Keep 966:talk 872:talk 840:talk 827:Keep 818:talk 810:Keep 800:talk 767:talk 759:only 719:talk 707:this 694:Keep 682:. 652:logs 636:talk 632:edit 613:damr 603:Keep 547:talk 543:meco 518:LGBT 474:talk 355:damr 289:talk 235:damr 104:damr 35:< 2283:or 2233:or 2135:to 2127:to 1911:to 1811:to 1736:to 1299:). 1117:. 738:can 730:not 678:or 466:-- 452:• ( 420:• ( 373:to 253:to 222:to 122:to 91:to 22:Log 2822:) 2803:) 2793:is 2782:) 2764:) 2747:) 2709:) 2677:) 2643:) 2635:-- 2622:) 2602:) 2575:) 2542:) 2534:-- 2523:) 2505:) 2484:) 2465:) 2437:| 2433:| 2429:| 2425:| 2421:| 2340:) 2309:) 2295:) 2285:in 2281:of 2273:) 2245:) 2219:) 2195:) 2169:) 2147:) 2109:→ 2100:→ 2091:→ 2082:→ 2073:→ 2064:→ 2053:) 2045:. 1986:) 1961:| 1957:| 1953:| 1949:| 1945:| 1851:) 1825:. 1823:}} 1817:{{ 1802:) 1777:| 1773:| 1769:| 1765:| 1761:| 1740:. 1680:) 1658:| 1654:| 1650:| 1646:| 1642:| 1557:) 1535:| 1531:| 1527:| 1523:| 1519:| 1434:) 1408:| 1404:| 1400:| 1396:| 1392:| 1307:) 1281:| 1277:| 1273:| 1269:| 1265:| 1180:) 1142:) 1125:) 1098:) 1077:| 1073:| 1069:| 1065:| 1061:| 968:) 949:. 943:, 937:, 931:, 925:, 919:, 913:, 907:, 901:, 874:) 842:) 820:) 802:) 769:) 721:) 650:| 646:| 642:| 638:| 634:| 549:) 520:. 476:/ 441:-- 398:☯ 291:) 269:. 138:. 2818:( 2799:( 2778:( 2760:( 2743:( 2705:( 2673:( 2639:( 2618:( 2598:( 2571:( 2538:( 2519:( 2501:( 2480:( 2461:( 2441:) 2417:( 2401:Ξ 2336:( 2305:( 2291:( 2269:( 2241:( 2215:( 2191:( 2165:( 2143:( 2049:( 1982:( 1965:) 1941:( 1921:X 1847:( 1798:( 1781:) 1757:( 1676:( 1662:) 1638:( 1618:X 1553:( 1539:) 1515:( 1495:X 1430:( 1412:) 1388:( 1368:X 1303:( 1285:) 1261:( 1241:X 1176:( 1138:( 1121:( 1094:( 1081:) 1057:( 1037:X 964:( 870:( 838:( 816:( 798:( 765:( 717:( 654:) 630:( 610:X 545:( 480:) 472:( 456:) 424:) 396:M 394:☺ 392:C 390:☎ 388:T 386:❤ 352:X 287:( 232:X 101:X

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion
Log
October 10
October 12
deletion review
Category:Wales Labour Party politicians
Category:Welsh Labour politicians
Xdamr
16:43, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Category:Wales Labour Party politicians
Category:Welsh Labour politicians
Welsh Labour
Good Ol’factory
23:52, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Armbrust

Contribs
01:29, 12 October 2010 (UTC)
deletion review
deletion review
Category:DOM-TOM Parties
Category:Political parties in the overseas departments and territories of France
Xdamr
16:44, 19 October 2010 (UTC)
Category:DOM-TOM Parties
Category:Political parties in the overseas departments and territories of France
Overseas departments and territories of France
Good Ol’factory
23:01, 11 October 2010 (UTC)
Johnbod

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑