Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2010 August 19

4715:-- We do not like "accused" categories, because they are potentially libellous. A person prosecuted and acquitted is entitled to be regarded as innocent, but this category carries the innuendo that they are guilty. I find it difficult to see how a woman can be guilt of buggery. Lesbian sex was never a crime in England (I think). It would be appropriate to have a category for "People convicted of homosexual offences", and I expect that there is one. This leaves the difficulty of those who killed themselves while awaiting trial (and such like). I hope that this is a small group who can either be tacitly (though strinctly incorrectly) be included in the convicted category, or perhaps we can do without a category for them. 1261:- If someone wants to note that they were formerly banned, they can note it quite easily on their user page. Categories shouldn't be used as bottom-of-the-page notices. That said, in reading the above, I could "almost" suggest keep if this was for those who have been recently unbanned (like in the last month), and this showing as a sort of probation, and an easy way for helpful admins to check on the probationees. However, the opportnities for abuse of this category (in mean-spiritedness) are just simply too high for it to be kept. - 3706:

interconnections. For example, the Mead Substation has 21 lines terminating there 9 of which can come from Hoover Dam (the pictures are a bit difficult to follow). Some of the lines from the Hoover Dam substation appear to connect with Arizona. The lines from Mead feed interconnects in three states and 15 power entities plus the dam. Yet this type of structure does not have an article. So which category does the Mead Substation go into?

4614:- not convinced by the nomination myself. I think this category is fairly clearly defined, and doesn't raise BLP issues; it's true 'anti-homosexuality laws' may be a bit vague, but it can be assumed to stand for 'laws which criminalise homosexual acts or behaviour'. Some people currently in it may not be categorised correctly, but I think in principle, it's an acceptable category (and one with a great deal of historical significance). 1326:. While I can see it as possible that some will want to use it as some kind of badge-of-honor, addition of this category to user pages other than your own should be forbidden and if done, it should be treated as vandalism and a personal attack. We need more positive reinforcements, not reminding people of their past errors, which is paramount to slapping them in the face and saying "we will never forgive". What's next, a 4658:'Buggery' predates 'homosexuality' - true; but buggery between same sex persons, well there is surely no difficulty in extending the definition of homosexuality to include that type of buggery. Regarding 'pornography': cases of prosecution where 'homosexual' pornography is involved far exceed prosecutions where heterosexual pornography is involved. Taking all things into account this Category is valid and useful. 1029:

ban lifted. Some of them, like Jack and BCommand, continue to be members of the community, some of them simply go away after they've won their fight, and some of them go on to get banned again. I don't see how this could be "abused." It's only intended to go on the pages of users who used to be banned, since they are no longer banned they are perfectly free to opt out and remove this (let me mention again)

2840:: because I created the categories for Amarna Letters, 1-authors, 2-officials, and 3-places (And many of the articles needed for the cats-(I had worked on the A.letters for 2-4 years-(required),.....(I even had to identify a letter that I Googled, and being the Reverse of the letter (8-10 cuneiform characters per line, (no formulaic stuff))(so one of the last Articles/letters I worked on)-(See also the 4410:

category were prosecuted centuries before the concept of a homosexual identity existed. Others were convicted under general anti-obscenity laws that did not necessarily pertain specifically to homosexuality. At least one woman was convicted for cross-dressing, which is not in and of itself a homosexual trait nor is a law forbidding it necessarily anti-homosexual. I propose that we

4430:"Prosecuted" is far more narrow than "accused of or alleged"; it means that there was necessarily government action taken against an individual. It doesn't require or imply that the individual was necessarily punished or convicted, or that they were a homosexual, just that there was an official process initiated on that basis. No comment beyond that for now. 2361:. As Kristin Barlowe's article was deleted for lacking notability, this is now categorizing works-by-person for a person not notable enough for an article. Note that there is a strong precedent that "albums produced by X" categories are deleted if X doesn't have an article; therefore, the same should apply to anything else that's "nouns verbed by X." 1229:. This is not a good idea for a category, and arguably not a useful one either (why does it help to know a user was unbanned? Why would anyone want to browse a list of unbanned users?). If a user wants to note on their own userpage that they've been banned and are now unbanned, they can do so, but we shouldn't have a category for the purpose. 2925:, I had the 3rd photo of a section of the 11-12 Chapters(Tablets), and I reviewed the use of some words in the other chapters, (before my attempt at line-by-line interpretation, for the 3rd photo section-(the beginning paragraphs 1 thru 8), trying to get a feel for them. (using the wonderful English, Maureen Kovacs (95 percent) 4632:

But that's not how the category is being used, nor is that definition accurate. There are people here who were prosecuted for such things as possession of obscene materials, which isn't an "anti-homosexuality law" and criminalizes obscene material regardless of content or prospective customers. There

2766:

I beg to differ. The proliferation of categories, if it is a problem at all, is the Knowledge (XXG) system's problem, not ours. If it truly is a problem, high level administrators will have to put limitations on the mechanism. Personally, I think that most list page are just plain dumb. If you have a

821:

Bans are meant to protect wikipedia, and shouldn't be used to permanently label users: regardless of what the proposed purpose of this category is, as it stands it simply categorises users as "previously banned", and carries the implication, intentional or not, that they should not be trusted or that

5346:

Part of a wrong pattern. They are cities or they are towns they are not both. There is a tree for cities and a tree for towns. The exceptions are places like Russia where the Russian name really means both. This is clean up from when the cleanup on these names started months ago. These could not

4409:

concerns should it be applied to a living person (one or another of the right-wingers who've been caught with their pants down in recent years, for example). The bigger problem is the assumption that the laws under which some of these people were convicted were "anti-homosexual". Some people in this

2929:

text)(Before the "Assyrian Project" cuneiform layout)-(And guess what, there is even "pornography, pornography-like use" in the text (one place I know of-(one could have guessed it))..(the 'prostitute' is one of the protagonists, in the story)-(these scribe guys (or gals) were quite the lucky people

1726:

There is another category on Universities and colleges affiliated with the Transcendental Meditation Movement, which follows Knowledge (XXG) convention. It mentions that "Institutions of higher education affiliated, associated or administered by the Transcendental Meditation movement" are mentioned,

1055:

Can you provide an example of where someone has "attacked" you please? I was very careful to indicate that I believe there to be an inherent problem with the category, and not that your motives were malicious, as indicated by the phrase "intentional or not" in my nomination. I resent the implication

1028:

category they can simply remove it from their user or talk pages. The goal here is not to label these users (since we already do that with the list of unbanned users that for some reason nobody objects to at all) but rather to aid in tracking what happens to users who have succeeded in getting their

4676:

So a woman convicted of buggery with a man should be categorized as having been "prosecuted" under an "anti-homosexuality law"? Someone convicted under a sexuality-neutral obscenity law should be categorized as having been "prosecuted" under an "anti-homosexuality law"? "Expanding the definition of

4470:

I'm not following your point here, at least as a reply to my comment. My point was only that your characterization of this as a mere allegation or accusation category was inapt, because the category focuses on some government as the accuser (rather than just anyone, as you'd have in an unqualified

4498:

I'm saying that there's a bias inherent in saying that a person's been prosecuted for a crime and that this bias argues against the category. Regardless, it appears that everyone in this category was convicted of one thing or another and given that there's really no need for a prosecuted category.

1629:

Yea, thanks for that, I only explained myself like seven times now, is it too much effort for you to read a conversation before participating in it? I can see where this is headed, and that's fine. I did this in good faith and made efforts to make it invisible and to make it clear that it was for

4741:

Your comment apears to carry with it the suggestion that homosexuality is deprecated or something to feel ashamed about. In reality homosexuality is to be celebrated as part of human diversity. As such I must disagree with your views, and recommend, once again, that the category stays, reflecting

2781:

Well, that's one opinion. In my opinion, it's not one that's been widely adhered to by consensus decisions at CFD. Generally, there has been no approach that says categories can be used whenever one editor feels they are necessary. They can be created when one user feels it is necessary, but once

1147:

How about this one: "I think Beeblebrox got too "over-excited" when he unblocked the user, and thought this was a fun idea." or this one:"This unsavoury and mean spirited category can only serve to create division and ill will amongst users." In the rush to defend the feelings of banned users my

1172:

If this category were kept, it would need to be renamed in line with current user categories, suchlike "Wikipedians who have formerly been banned". It would also need to be opt-in. My concern is issues it would cause: people 'tagging' formerly banned users who do not want the category on their

946:

I considered this option when commenting on the related template; I believe if a user would like to identify as being formerly banned but now reformed, I think a userbox is probably the way to go rather than a category which would be quite easily prone to abuse in the aforementioned manner.

4553:

Yes, I went ahead and created and populated the category. Regardless of the outcome here I thought that the Para 175 category was valid and viable. The persecution category already existed (note that Para 175 both pre- and post-dates Nazi Germany so the two categories are not synonymous).

3705:

just included the participating transmission system and not the notable ties. So while there may be a lot of overlap currently, I think that is simply an indication that there are a lot of missing articles. One other issue is that we tend to downplay and not really explain are the grid

2686:- You could delete the category called "Amarna letters locations" for the same reason. However, it is a useful tool to have when trying to draw parallels between settlements for the same period. And there aren't that many 20th-18th century BCE historical-geographical texts to go on. -- 996:- either you allow mandatory listing of users (in which case it's a clear permanent label that discourages redeemed users, regardless of intent) or you make it opt-in (in which case it's basically useless for any productive purpose). I don't think either is particularly helpful. ~ 447:

is suspect. Why would we want to categorize together various bridges that happen to have been named after MLK? This seems to be the sort of things lists typically deal with. I could understand categorizing actual monuments to MLK together—but bus stops, streets, and hospitals?

1114:

I don't see any statements by anyone else which were any closer to attacking his motives either, so it seemed like he was at least partly referring to my own statement, which I had tried to keep courteous as always; in any case, I'm willing to drop the issue if Beeblebrox is.

4633:

are people who were prosecuted under "buggery" laws which predate the concept of "homosexuality" as a sexual identity so by definition the laws can't be "anti-homosexuality" (buggery between a male and a female was also illegal under most of these laws). We already have

1716: 5500:

this discussion, and have a broader discussion concerning "cities and towns" vs "cities" and "towns" vs "settlements" vs whatever else. I'd like to see a broader consensus, since there are more than a few of these, across many different intersection types. -

2767:

tool called categories - use it. It's more convenient, because it shows up on the relevant pages, and links you to all relevant entries. A list (especially one like this one) would show a whole bunch of names that probably will never get their own page. --

1148:

feelings apparently are not important. It's not making me cry or anything, I', sure I'll get a good night's sleep tonight, but those remarks are not helpful and make unfounded assumptions about my motives. And no, neither of them were written by you.

4475:

category), and requires that government have taken some action to try to punish based on the allegation under some law. Which isn't to say this category shouldn't be deleted or kept, but I just wanted us to be clear on what we were talking about.

2135:

Pure duplication. Alternatively, the singular "Bibliothèque nationale de France collection" is more consistent with the other categories in the parent, & I'd be happy to set a precedent to rename to "Collection of ...." like most museums have.

1191:

per Xeno, for now, and keep because the AN discussion was still ongoing (what a lovely way to fork the discussion and complicate the reading of the original thread). Also, I think we should see how this works out. We already label people on the

2967:(Listify if wanted). Being "useful" may lead this information to have value to be conveyed in an article of some type. But we probably should not be categorising places based upon appearing in written works... Imagine how many categories 1727:

which is all inclusive. So the category "Universities and colleges associated with the Transcendental Meditation Movement" is redundant. Use of the word "affiliated" follows existing Knowledge (XXG) convention, unlike "associated".

2901:). If 'One' pre-emptively jumps on something, Best give it more than 24-48 hours. Removing the category for execration texts, is probably an impossibility: It is a VIEW into societies, morals, religion, and etc..... , the wonderful 909:

There are potentially positive ways to use this: for example, an unbanned user who comes back to become a well-respected one might just like to self-identify. I believe additional discussion regarding the possible uses of this at

2884:

exercise, and not intentional, but probably the resultant. (I just got a note about the execration texts, (I had just seen items being put in the category, so I hadn't bothered to go there. It's almost like the pre-emptive

2890: 518:

It would probably be better to expend the energy in cleaning out the categories instead of trying to restructure them. The two terms are often interchangeable, and splitting them apart is unlikely to aid navigation. -

487:, and thinking that it is in dire need of cleaning. And honestly, of clarification. Everything from ubiquitous pyramids to buildings named after someone, to tributes in media. Any suggestions and/or volunteers? : ) - 2905:, some as cartoons, are part of the wonder of human history, human originality. (Thank Goodness, in words, and paragraphs, one can express themselves).... (from a HOT-SonoranDesert, ArizaonUSA)-(And a replay, for 1509:, per Xeno noting that if it is opt-in it has no point. The could be purpose in keeping a record of bannings, but this isn't a good way. Also, there are too few members for it to be worthwhile as a category. -- 3696:

within defined areas. The interconnects are the facilities that provide isolation against failure while allowing the various systems to be tied together to share power. So their roles are quite different.

2177:

All the other "collection/s" are so called; "holdings" seems affected to me. The vast majority of their collections are of course not manuscripts, though all the articles so far do I think cover manuscripts.

3670: 2668:. Being mentioned in a work is generally not defining for a place, unless it's the only evidence that the place existed. I don't think that these ancient places are defined by their being mentioned in the 2703:

Yes, we certainly could. The fact that something is useful doesn't necessarily mean a category is the best means to present the information, however. I just don't see this as a defining characteristic of

4758:

As Knowledge (XXG) editors we neither deprecate nor celebrate homosexuality. However, society certainly can and does both. It is only quite recently that calling someone gay wasn't considered defamation

4736:

we do not like "accused" categories because they are potentially libellous. A person prosecuted and acquitted is entitled to be regarded as innocent, but this category carries the innuendo that they are

699:

is not necessarily a population center, but a municipal subdivision of a county (not unlike a "civil township" or "borough" in other states). A city is commonly surrounded by a town of the same name.-

3330: 1033:

category from their page. I would ask everyone to limit their comments to the cat itself and stop attacking my motives, which I have plainly stated repeatedly now. I would also like to hear from some

1020:

There's a lot of uninformed and wrong headed speculation about my motives in the above votes which shows that they did not read my clearly stated rationale for creating this when I posted about it at

4358: 3626: 4414:

the category and restrict it to those people who were actually convicted of something (but I have no idea what the best name or scope would be) and then review the articles to see what belongs.

4402: 5422:. Mediterranean is redundant as Malta has no other coast; "cities", "towns", etc. is also redundant, and causes an argument over which they are, becuase of the differing usages of "city". 5455:

Given the parent categories above this category, it might be in order to withdraw this nomination and instead nominate all the non-conforming names of child/grandchild, etc categories of

4271: 2358: 42: 37: 4394: 4529: 4349: 3666: 3617: 2127: 2102: 3369:– The 1964 CAMS Manual of Motor Sport used the term "Australian Formula 2" for the category when it was introduced in that year, it still uses "Australian Formula 2" as can be seen at 1630:

tracking purposes only and would be hidden, and yet I'm still being attacked. Delete the damn category already and end this, I'm sick of these thoughtless nasty attacks on my motives.

3499: 400: 2105:. There is no consensus for the name of the category. Probably, a separate discussion should be held in order to find out a consensus as to how all such categories should be named. 5294: 3986: 1712: 5092: 4452:

A lot of innocent people are prosecuted. Not saying that that in and of itself mandates action but the stigma of prosecution when innocent does IMHO raise serious questions.

3731:

for now. I'm going to wait on deletion until we clarify how we are using the transmission systems, grids and interconnect categories before agreeing with deletion of these.

1246:

with fire. Even if hidden, this isn't the greatest idea ever. I was actually quite tempted to circumvent this discussion and IAR delete it. We aren't here to judge people.

2921:, though it actually came earlier(?))... the Mari texts, Kultepe texts, Ugaritic texts, others WILL follow, it is just a question of when: an Aside: when I worked on the 4397:

instead of this vaguer category. There is also the issue of this being an "accused of" or "alleged" category, something which may not be a concern for these people

4161:- The name of the page is: "In the news". The reason that the word "Knowledge (XXG)" is shown is to indicate that this is not a main namespace-related category. - 2757:. I have no objection to a list of this material. I just don't agree that it's category material, whether or not it was the first known mention of place or not. 5329: 2947: 399:. We don't categorize things together when all they have in common is that they were named after the same person. Other similar ones for eponymous schools were 2821:, mention in articles where appropriate. It's a nice category, but the category system can't usefully support this level of granularity in its current state. 5087: 5007: 3662: 3658: 1395:

this is a list of previously banned users that wanted to be included in this cat, there are more previously banned users but they didn't want to be included.

4902:

There's only one article in this category; it appears marginally notable at best, and the other articles previously in the category have been deleted under

5477:

That is acceptable when if and when we have articles that are not about port cities. But when it is only cities call it that. But if it needs to move to

4525: 1459:

Good intentions or not, this has the perceived effect of being a permanent mark of shame on reformed editors. What good it might do is outweighed by that.

3487: 3349: 4010: 3998: 21: 4366: 4043:

and a couple of other cosmetic fixes. Change also makes clear that the categories are not for times when Knowledge (XXG) is mentioned in news outlets.

3634: 1953: 1864: 3714:, who owns the facility? Clearly it is a major interconnection point for power to multiple transmission systems but it is not a transmission system. 4076:

I don't think this rename is actually possible - as far as I know, you can't have two colons in a category title. If I'm wrong, go ahead and do it.

3317:) tried to rename this category by redirecting it to a non-existent target; I've replaced the redirect with a rename request, because the relevant 5095:. (Note: I created both categories, but this one came first -- I got the name better on the parent cat. PS - Thanks for the notification, Koavf.) 4267: 4026: 4022: 3941: 2782:

nominated they are subject to whatever consensus decides, and in many cases that decision is that it is not an appropriate use of category space.

2156: 372: 5361:

what user use or benefit is there to having separate trees for 'Ports cities' and 'Port towns'? They don't exist now. No use that I can see.

4244:

Anyway, while I stick with the nomination, whatever the outcome the admin one should be renamed to conform with the capitalization of the rest.

4882: 2123: 364: 3990: 2337: 1543:. This targets only one user and is un-needed as it shows this person was bad in the past and that kind of public knowledge may be harmful. - 17: 4874: 3341: 3483: 2739:

When you're taking about the first known historical mention of a place, it is relevant. The execration texts pre-date the Amarna scripts. --

2329: 1285: 822:

they are somehow "beneath" other users. I see no useful purpose of this category other than to label users with a great deal of negativity.

5390: 3075: 2310: 1557:

To be fair, Beeblebrox was not specifically targeting me; xeno mostly emptied the category (see above). I believe in transparency about my

696: 4224: 3288: 3067: 1393:- The recently unblocked Mario is already requesting to change his name so he can move on I don't think he will be wanting t add his cat. 881:

I think Beeblebrox got too "over-excited" when he unblocked the user, and thought this was a fun idea. I also agree with LessHeard vanU. /

355: 4768: 4682: 4642: 4577: 4559: 4504: 4457: 4419: 4249: 4187: 4120: 4102: 4048: 4865: 4698:- Clear BLP issues, different laws in different countries etc, awful. Prosecuted but founfd innocent, really you must be having a laugh. 4634: 3498:. Small category. If several other merging nominations succeed, it will create a properly populated category. The related discussion is 3292: 3267: 2320: 1430:- same reason we don't demand people keep warnings on their talk page. If someone's disruptive we can easily check past issues anyway. 5478: 2200: 4227:

begins with Knowledge (XXG), and not a one has two colons. I don't see a compelling reason for introducing a new pseudo-namespace. -

4212: 3657:. The guidelines says that this category lists regional power grids or interconnects. However, it does not says how it differs from 3058: 679:

In both everyday and WP usage, the undisambiguated form invariably refers to the denser entity (city or village)— even among locals,

4790:. No prejudice against this being a well-sourced list/article, which explains the circumstances of such accusations/prosecutions. - 2541: 2492: 5209: 4014: 4002: 3962: 463: 444: 418: 3591: 421:. If someone else has a better scheme for this or thinks that it simply doesn't need diffusion, please let me know here. Thanks. — 5298: 3978: 3974: 3707: 3702: 3698: 3370: 1451: 1250: 1205: 1097: 535:– agree with Vegaswikian's idea re categorisation. I went to King Edward VII School but no-one ever suggested it was a memorial. 484: 3711: 3599: 2861: 2860:

has the largest number-(of many of the mid-centuries-It only gets larger after 1000 BC), of "Persons from the 14th century BC"-

2809: 864:

as per the nomination. This unsavoury and mean spirited category can only serve to create division and ill will amongst users.

660: 275:

I must have botched this when I did the conversions into "video albums" categories, mistyping as "music videos." Speedy-able?--

245: 120: 4220: 3395: 462:

per nom and per precedent - not really a defining characteristic. I have no problem with the schools being recategorised into

396: 5028: 4764: 4678: 4638: 4573: 4555: 4500: 4453: 4415: 4245: 4183: 4116: 4098: 4044: 3582: 2913:, about 12-16 Amarna letters)(It is a wonderful Soap Opera,-(the Amarna letters, (there's poetry, also, etc., and the entire 2609: 1370: 1327: 931: 1945: 1916: 4333:. I actually failed to understand the argument related to the BLP—almost all articles appear to be about people long dead. 2018:

There's no need for merging. Everything in it is already part of the parent category. It either needs keeping or deleting.

5205: 3966: 3863: 2637: 664: 4786:

all "prosecuted" categories as just being examples of an accusation with a process attached. The keyword missing here is

4389:. This category is problematic. The bulk of its contents appear to be people sent to concentration camps under Germany's 787: 3813: 2488: 897: 5521: 5460: 5261: 5237: 5173: 5149: 4991: 4967: 4834: 4810: 4318: 4294: 3925: 3901: 3780: 3756: 3551: 3527: 3451: 3427: 3251: 3227: 3027: 3003: 2593: 2569: 2455: 2431: 2290: 2266: 2086: 2062: 1795: 1771: 1678: 1654: 1492: 748: 724: 584: 560: 324: 300: 199: 175: 74: 5505: 5490: 5472: 5448: 5437: 5431: 5402: 5384: 5370: 5356: 5341: 5318: 5286: 5221: 5194: 5133: 5116: 5104: 5080: 5061: 5053: 5032: 5020: 4951: 4934: 4915: 4859: 4794: 4772: 4751: 4724: 4707: 4686: 4667: 4646: 4623: 4603: 4581: 4563: 4544: 4508: 4489: 4461: 4443: 4423: 4343: 4278: 4253: 4231: 4191: 4165: 4145: 4124: 4106: 4085: 4071: 4052: 3954: 3885: 3868: 3842: 3834: 3817: 3805: 3740: 3723: 3682: 3576: 3511: 3475: 3411: 3386: 3361: 3280: 3211: 3181: 3154: 3137: 3118: 3106:

part of one country's culture and it is just being appropriated by another country's culture. Things can be placed in

3102:-ish category. Something can legitimately be part of the culture of more than one country. It doesn't mean that it is 3052: 2987: 2959: 2939: 2831: 2813: 2786: 2776: 2761: 2748: 2728: 2695: 2676: 2645: 2622: 2553: 2532: 2513: 2480: 2415: 2392: 2366: 2314: 2250: 2230: 2212: 2187: 2168: 2145: 2115: 2046: 2032: 2011: 1997: 1970: 1933: 1907: 1884: 1876: 1820: 1755: 1736: 1702: 1639: 1622: 1595: 1565: 1552: 1535: 1518: 1499: 1486: 1467: 1454: 1442:, a ban, which is typically enforced via a block, is easy enough to check on without categorizing users like this... — 1434: 1422: 1405: 1382: 1361: 1344: 1318: 1298: 1265: 1253: 1238: 1217: 1183: 1157: 1130: 1109: 1071: 1050: 1012: 988: 962: 937: 901: 873: 856: 837: 772: 708: 671: 649: 609: 544: 523: 513: 491: 475: 452: 438: 430: 407: 349: 284: 265: 257: 224: 159: 140: 132: 99: 2628: 107: 4472: 795: 778: 236: 232: 4947: 4677:

homosexuality" is another way of saying "original research" as is ascribing motives to lawmakers without evidence.

4541: 4094: 3314: 2922: 2805: 1558: 869: 621: 111: 4204: 3107: 2826: 2412: 1732: 1619: 1309:, however it was restored and I got tired of arguing for it to be removed. One is bad enough, we don't need two. 1306:

as redundant and potentially damaging. I had previously removed the related "List of Formerly Banned Users" here

1196:, this can be removed by the user if they really wish but is still good for, well, categorizing (tracking, etc.) 1127: 1068: 959: 834: 5520:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

5236:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

5148:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4966:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4809:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4293:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4208: 3900:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3755:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3526:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3426:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3226:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3111: 3099: 3002:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2724:; etc. What century the text happens to have been written in is irrelevant when it's a place that still exists. 2568:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2430:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2265:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2061:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

1770:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

1653:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

723:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

559:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

299:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

174:

Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

5456: 5260:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

5172:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4990:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4833:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4317:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4064: 3924:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3779:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3550:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3450:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3250:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

3026:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2592:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2454:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2289:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

2085:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

1794:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

1677:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

1548: 852: 747:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

583:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

323:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

198:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

73:

Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's talk page or in a

4175: 4060: 4040: 3852:

I created this category thinking that I would put more articles in it, but I don't think there are enough. --

1835: 5419: 2159:

would be my choice personally, but out of these two names I'd say 'Holdings' is preferable to 'collections'.

1894:

per nom; strictly speaking it's not redundant, as not all songs written by George Harrison were published by

504:

as a child. Then start splitting the mess. Probably needs some discussing someplace before a big overhaul.

5427: 5057: 5041: 4720: 4537: 3838: 3471: 1880: 1698: 1531: 1314: 692: 688: 434: 280: 261: 136: 3321:

suggests that Australia does use the "Formula 2" rather than "Formula Two" spelling for its racing series.

2403: 1610: 1475: 1118: 1059: 950: 825: 617: 1941: 1826: 5486: 5380: 5352: 5314: 4943: 4930: 4274:; keep the rest as they are. There is no precedent for double colons, and I don't see the need for it. 3736: 3719: 2377: 1484: 1464: 1371:"Badges? We ain't got no badges. We don't need no badges! I don't have to show you any stinkin' badges!" 1310: 865: 509: 155: 4216: 1278: 1226: 5347:

be batch nominated since each and every article needs to be looked at to see what actions are needed.

1843: 5441: 4703: 4524:. Could it be that the category was stripped of Paragraph 175 cases since the original posting? (the 3881: 3345: 3318: 3194: 2823: 1728: 1635: 1447: 1443: 1401: 1247: 1210: 1153: 1102: 1084:

I don't think it was specifically directed toward you, and I don't think he meant "attacking" in the

1046: 768: 637: 633: 2387: 5113: 4600: 3693: 3208: 3133: 3115: 2951: 2783: 2758: 2725: 2673: 2008: 1544: 1514: 848: 645: 449: 404: 4591: 2946:) completed by SUnday,-(sic) late afternoon, and other categories, now continued as a result are: 1413:. For more reasons than I can shake a stick at. Per Robofish, per Black Kite, per Jc37, per LHvU. 5423: 5100: 5076: 4857: 4716: 4619: 4139: 4081: 3952: 3803: 3467: 3150: 3050: 2955: 2549: 2509: 2478: 2164: 1903: 1751: 1694: 1591: 1562: 1527: 1496: 1378: 1357: 1234: 1056:

that I am making personal attacks simply because I do not feel that the category should be kept.

985: 919: 607: 501: 497: 471: 347: 276: 222: 97: 3326: 2007:

per nom. There is no tree for songs by publisher and I don't really see the need to start one.

5281: 5129: 5015: 4911: 4484: 4438: 4338: 3571: 3407: 3275: 2617: 2528: 2226: 2183: 2141: 2110: 1815: 1337: 704: 4200: 1193: 5482: 5468: 5398: 5376: 5366: 5348: 5337: 5310: 4926: 4275: 3732: 3715: 3678: 3507: 3500:

Knowledge (XXG):Categories for discussion/Log/2010_July_27#Category:Plug-in hybrid promoters

3357: 3171: 2873: 2772: 2744: 2691: 2669: 2208: 2026: 1991: 1964: 1927: 1479: 1460: 1418: 1307: 887: 684: 680: 668: 540: 505: 151: 4406: 4393:. Clearly they belong in a category akin to this one but would perhaps be better served by 4115:

Would the admin who closes this debate please also delete the above test category? Thanks.

2872:

the history of the world is actually one of the things being done by Knowledge (XXG), (see

1604: 1085: 911: 5445: 5436:

The use of "cities" isn't entirely redundant. Please note the difference in scope between

5218: 5191: 5049: 4747: 4699: 4663: 4228: 4068: 3877: 3830: 3701:

provides a better picture of this by providing article about the converter stations while

3190: 2857: 2382: 1952:

the deleting. Merging isn't necessary as all songs in the category are already members of

1872: 1631: 1397: 1225:, per the nomination and the justification I've just given for deleting the corresponding 1200: 1149: 1092: 1042: 764: 520: 426: 253: 128: 4903: 1717:

Category:Universities and colleges affiliated with the Transcendental Meditation movement

1713:

Category:Universities and colleges associated with the Transcendental Meditation Movement

1664:

Category:Universities and colleges associated with the Transcendental Meditation Movement

1021: 981: 915: 659:, I think. The status quo seems to be standard for this kind of situation; for example, 1493:

impaled children on a pike and cast them over a wall to bleed-out in their mother's arms

496:

Yuck! Memorials seem to be a type of monument. So maybe the starting move is to create

3382: 3308: 3129: 2501: 1980: 1510: 1296: 1181: 641: 5375:

If we have more then one type, it would be named using some form of populated places.

2701:"You could delete the category called "Amarna letters locations" for the same reason." 847:

If you are not currently blocked or banned then you should simply be "a contributor".

5096: 5072: 4850: 4615: 4390: 4134: 4077: 3945: 3796: 3207:, who apparently was unaware of the convention not to do this during an ongoing CFD. 3204: 3146: 3043: 2980: 2709: 2545: 2505: 2471: 2400:: I don't think this technically meets a CSD, but it seems pretty non-controversial. 2160: 1899: 1747: 1576: 1374: 1353: 1230: 926: 600: 467: 340: 215: 90: 5277: 5125: 5011: 4907: 4478: 4432: 4334: 3854: 3567: 3403: 3322: 3271: 2950:-(and that too has evolved forward)---.... (from a HOT-SonoranDesert, ArizaonUSA).. 2713: 2613: 2524: 2222: 2179: 2137: 2106: 1811: 1333: 700: 5464: 5394: 5362: 5333: 5217:

Apparently we've ended up with two of these that differ only by capitalisation.

4533: 4179: 3674: 3665:

although most of entries have this or one of its subcategories. Same applies to

3503: 3399: 3353: 3164: 2909:, after creating all the three categories, I linked as many photos available on 2768: 2740: 2687: 2204: 2020: 1985: 1958: 1921: 1919:

or something. Categorising songs into their publishing company would be useful.

1414: 882: 536: 5328:

Part of a pattern. This matches nearly every one of its sibling categories in

1746:- this is an empty category in any case, but they're obviously the same topic. 5045: 4743: 4659: 3826: 2856:.... The result of the categories in the 1350-1330 BC (timeframe) is that the 1976: 1895: 1868: 1037:

unbanned users to see what they think since this all this defense of how they

1024:. This is not intended to be mandatory, if a user does not want to be in this 997: 422: 249: 124: 5502: 4791: 4162: 3378: 3304: 2984: 2906: 2849: 2705: 2247: 2043: 1289: 1262: 1174: 488: 5254: