1875:
defending a lawsuit over whether the statue may remain isn't worth it. Some may ascribe to that an inherent "political reason", but then the banality of such "political reasons" makes it non-defining. And one can never really ascribe motives to anonymous actors with any certainty and the speculation of reliable sources is still just speculation. Any of the recent statues torn down during the protests/riots in the US may be ascribed to "political reasons" but that proves too much. For those who are convinced that there is group hell-bent on white supremacy, one could claim that the various people whose deaths are being protested were killed for "political reasons" too.
1585:. First "dishonored" is undefinable; if someone urinates on it, puts graffiti on it, puts a mask on it (as done recently) is is "dishonored"? Does it matter why each of those is done? We cannot fathom the motives of usually anonymous actors. Hence, those items based on "political reasons" are probably subject to analysis, re-analysis, and what is political compared to good for one's image, "good for business", or just anger or not willing to spend the money to defend it? Those statues removed or destroyed keeps it simple and unbiased.
735:
1701:. In the detailing I have refined the description into "permanently dishounoured", so as to keep out any paint-thrown event. (However, maybe the restriction 'permanently' might be thrown out when/since only full articles about statues would be included? If the statue has its own article, it might be included then for being 'temporally' dishonoured.
1097:, founder of the Boy Scout movement but a fan of the Hitler Youth – removed from public display pending review yesterday. There have been two or three similar examples in London, with similar unsavoury pasts, that have been taken out of streets. Maybe they belong in art galleries or museums but do not merit the status of national hero! --
1664:- About 'Statues': I initially used this word becasue it is well-defined overall. We could include other memorials, I think there should be some explicit "act of honouring" attached to it. When even more widened to "statues ... and symbols", the definition has no borders any more and would make the category less useful (example:
1760:, which to me would be very a usefull inclusion. Some argued that it is POV, while I think that our RS-policy prevents that, starting in the article itself (btw, isn't this same POV-argument working for "political reasons"?). Finally, I tried to explain that dishonouring is the exact opposit of "honouring ". Have a nice edit. -
1756:, "useless" or just wrong? Anyway, I count four editors who propose to remove this criterium wholesale (no "dishonoured/political motive" at all). Which removes the essence, and I cannot count that as issues with this word itself. Limiting all to "removed for political reason" (as you do) might work, but excludes
1609:
are well-sourced (by RS) by definition. This category is just using that, it does not redefine or re-interpret the article (which indeed would be POV). The example "if someone urinates on it" by itself does not qualify because of this (and it is not "permanently" btw, now a requirement). However, if
896:
dishonoring? Maybe, maybe not: artworks are regularly put in storage for any number of reasons. Is it permanent? Probably not. While there is plenty of room between putting it atop City Hall and melting it down to make a public toilet, there is no clear line for "dishonoured". What are the objective
293:
a "film about" category: what objective measure says how much about the subject must the film be; and what reliable sources tell us it's at least that much. This is a particularly egregious one of the genre, since a vast number (maybe most, maybe nearly all) of films have some familial relationships
143:
It seems fairly clear from the content that the intention of the category is indeed films about "individual named families (real or fictional)", & this seems an acceptable category. The proposed rename would cast the net even wider - too much so, imo. Yes, some purging is probably needed, for
1874:
I agree with
Marcocapelle, but would include destroyed with removed as somethings are left destroyed. The reasons are unfathomable; if done by the legislature (town or larger), they may be ascribed to "political reasons", but not necessarily as governments often remove statues because the cost of
1638:- First, the existence of this category, exact naming aside, is encyclopedically relevant. Roughly, it is the the intersection of 'statue', 'removed' and 'political reason'. From here, IMO, the next question is a better naming/definition. Not even by the nom, who proposed deletion in boldface,
1159:
Dishonoured is a loaded NPOV term and arguably not defining. It's exceptionally unclear, implies that the original statue was an honour, and further implies someone took an action to slight that honour. That's how I read it at first and I'm not the only one here who thinks that based on the
892:"Dishonoured" is an inherently vague, POV term. In Philadelphia, the Frank Rizzo statue was regularly spat on and vandalized with labels like "Racist". To many, that would be "dishonouring". The talk page discussion is looking for something "permanent". Now the statue is in storage. Is
1501:
779:
there seems to be a consensus that the category should not be deleted, and there is consensus that the current name should change, but there is no consensus on what it should be renamed to. Since there is consensus that the current name is inappropriate, I will move this to
1683:
or decapitating the statue: turning around the "honour". I don't see why this is POV. There are enough reliable sources that describe a protest as a protest. Sure this question can rise with all political or social activities, but as long as we use guidelines as
1341:
would be within its scope, which I think would be diluting it somewhat. Limiting the scope to works which have actually been removed would be better than having a category for public monuments under a cloud, which could potentially expand to infinite size.
436:
was last known as the
Crusaders before the team folded after the 1939 season. The "Hilltoppers" moniker did not come into usage at the school in 1947. The football team was also known as the Saints and Tigers prior to being renamed the Crusaders. See also
1705:
for example. More considerations?). All in all: I prefer to keep the word "dishonour" in the definition; claims that it is POV is missing the power of our reliable sourcing etc. policies. My secondary preferrence is "political protest" (before "political
1233:
I'll just say that lots of statues are "removed" for all sorts of reasons - for example from display to storage in museums. The group collected here were all removed/destroyed for reasons that (broadly construed) are political. Hence my suggestion of
1650:- In my opinion difficulty of wording, when the difficulty is only in the exact bordering of a word's meaning, this does not qualify for deletion; improvement and clarification (for example in the category page introduction) should solve it.
123:
of family (e.g. relationships), or individual named families (real or fictional)? If the former, it should be renamed. If the latter, major purging would seem to be in order (it seems a tricky distinction to make though).
2227:
These 2 categories contain just one article and we are generally moving away from categorizing organisms (especially marine organisms) by country as it leads to large numbers of non-defining categories on some articles.
1391:
it does not help a lot to restrict this to political motives, because there is no political motives tree which we can make this category part of. I would rather propose to include removals and destroyals for any reason.
1328:
1238:. Another suggestion, "intentionally damaged statues" is too broad and vague - does this include paint? Some damage is fairly trivial and not defining. No objection to "public sculpture" rather than "statues".
1696:
these doubts can be resolved. For
Knowledge such a strive for NPOV in subtle issues is nothing new, and is not reason to eliminate a questioned concept like '(dis)honoured' and even extreme wordings like
842:
This category lacks objective criteria. What is "dishonouring"? Covering it with tar and setting it on fire? Moving it to a new location? Putting it in storage? Spitting on it? Allowing it to weather away?
1828:
is the best solution (and purging statues that have not been removed). The fact that they have been "dishonoured" is of course interesting to mention in the articles but not a basis for categorization.
1046:. The issues with the current name are obvious, so I won't go on about them. The subject is highly topical, and defining - the nom does not address whether a category is needed in this area - it is.
1331:– " monuments and memorials" doesn't come under "statues'; it's the other way around. "Dishonoured" is POV, and considering the British spelling is not very idiomatic in British English.
1145:, "dishonoured" is nicely the opposite of "honouring" by erecting a statue, and intentionally has the 'political reasons' in it too. Also, qualification is by RS as always, not by POV. -
1111:"Dishonoured" is very subjective and POV and would need to be deleted if there wasn't an available alternative. Would prefer "Demolished or removed statutes" to just "Removed statues."
995:
to align with its subcategory, and purge any statues from the category that are still or again in place. Definitely do not keep the category under its current name, as too subjective.
1668:
was not erected in honour but is an 'symbol'; should any (theoretical) protests make for inclusion?). This way, I support including 'monuments' in this category, and so in the naming.
742:
42:
37:
1735:
DePiep, the only thing everyone else here agrees on is that "dishonoured" is a completely useless word in a category name. Perhaps this is more obvious to native speakers.
873:: the criteria are described in the header. The talkpage has invitations for improvements, including improvements on the scope. This also answers some questions in the nom.
422:
410:
398:
1424:
does cover removals of statues for political motives as well, I expect in real life the term "iconoclasm" is hardly ever used in a secular (non-religious) context.
2012:- In most English usage, "Bedouin" seems to be used as an adjective, singular noun and group noun. "Bedouins" is commonly used as plural including in the article,
1702:
1337:
doesn't fit in the category as it currently is if its scope is statues. If it were just "removed and destroyed", without the "political reasons", something like
897:
inclusion criteria? There certainly aren't any included that I can find, and I can't dream up another term to convey whatever the category is intended to say. -
2411:. Sports biography categories are not divided by century, even for events like boxing or archery that are millennia old, so this is not useful for navigation. ―
632:
1658:
1610:"politician Z urinates on statue" makes the papers, and from there a Knowledge article, inclusion in this category is correct, not POV, and to the point. -
1094:
1713:
386:
2408:
1323:
21:
1235:
1043:
2217:
2205:
1093:, name needs work. Is it to be just statues pulled down by the populace, for example, the statue of Sadam Hussein. What about the statue of
537:
523:
506:
489:
473:
450:
374:
1500:
The intent here seems to be statues that were vandalized or destroyed for political reasons but that has been going on for a long time:
1174:
1125:
643:
418:
406:
394:
17:
1216:
1160:
discussion. There's no reason why we can't have a removed statue category though and that would be defining, but this is an overreach.
878:
Also, this post gives me a first impression of "I don't understand it", instead of "Not a good idea, for these considerations: ...". -
1297:
Not that subjective (POV?) IMO. Politcal protest is well-sourced (RS) to be included in the article, this being
Knowledge. See also
620:
469:
2393:
2381:
628:
438:
2397:
2385:
1272:
252:(as nominator): As mentioned above, for fictional families the distinction seems really unclear. Maybe this should be renamed to
382:
2000:
1757:
1680:
1102:
514:
per nom, as is the standard naming convention when sports teams were known by a different nickname prior to their dissolution.
2021:
1665:
1567:
1370:"Monuments" would already include "memorials", innit? Wouldn't just "Monuments" cover all nicely though? Worth considering. -
253:
1578:
1556:
1196:
1824:
If statues have been "dishonoured" but not removed it is barely a defining characteristic, that is why I still think that
662:
per actual content, after I moved three articles that were directly in this category to the appropriate continent subcat.
105:
1275:
is the only specific "incident" article currently in the category. So a rename is the obvious way to go for most of us.
854:? Are paintings "dishonoured" when they are moved, put in storage or painted over? Is editing a movie "dishonouring" it?
917:
812:
2429:
1333:
616:
210:
1015:"Removed" would eliminate the "political protest" (or 'dishounouring') aspect, which IMO is essential here. See also
202:
simple wording can lead to confusion... I believe many readers will find differences between "Films about
Families" (
165:, films about families is an extremely broad and indiscriminate characteristic. Perhaps we should consider deletion.
1774:(ec) Note: I do not understand the reasoning that "there is no parent cat available for this concept, so ..." could
214:); "Films about Family" (educational films about family life in general); and even "Family Films" (sometimes called
2473:
2457:
2438:
2373:
2369:
2302:
2285:
2271:
2252:
2234:
2201:
2193:
2189:
2120:
2106:
2084:
2063:
2034:
2004:
1996:
1965:
1884:
1869:
1838:
1813:
1791:
1769:
1744:
1729:
1619:
1594:
1569:
1537:
1513:
1509:
1492:
1469:
1460:
I do not understand how this requirement of some parent category could force us into/away from any category name. -
1449:
1433:
1415:
1401:
1379:
1365:
1351:
1310:
1284:
1266:
1247:
1228:
1207:
1179:
1154:
1130:
1098:
1079:
1055:
1028:
1004:
975:
955:
937:
907:
887:
864:
789:
699:
671:
652:
608:
604:
370:
303:
283:
271:
265:
244:
227:
192:
174:
157:
133:
97:
2213:
1257:
Far too subjective a term for categorisation. Better to make a category for the incidents than for the statues.
820:
803:
2493:
2350:
2322:
2170:
2142:
1938:
1910:
766:
719:
585:
557:
351:
323:
109:
78:
1552:
1480:
2090:
2017:
1956:
1880:
1825:
1590:
992:
781:
433:
299:
180:
145:
2448:, categorizing people by occupation and century is not meaningful for a modern occupation like racing driver.
2262:
per nom, in line with many previous mergers of organism categories from country to region or continent level.
2433:
1203:
1166:
1117:
204:
2453:
2267:
2102:
2059:
1834:
1429:
1397:
1000:
951:
667:
519:
502:
279:
223:
170:
1406:
It fits into the iconclasm tree. Including ones "for any reason" makes the category too vague and broad.
2489:
2365:
2346:
2318:
2185:
2166:
2138:
1934:
1906:
1505:
762:
715:
600:
581:
553:
465:
366:
347:
319:
74:
1645:. Above, I have read just one argument against the existence itself (~ 'not a new issue so delete' ?).
2094:
2047:
1977:
1952:
1262:
2470:
1962:
1876:
1779:
1698:
1586:
786:
486:
295:
94:
270:
Seems awkward and clumsy, but I don't have a better idea either... I think we need some help from
1582:
1565:
1488:
1199:
1161:
1112:
943:
684:
446:
261:
240:
129:
1679:. The dishounouring can be removal-by-protest, but it also includes explicit statements such as
1524:
Yup, it has been going on a long time, but how is that a reason for deletion? In fact statues
1502:
File:Johannes Adam Simon Oertel
Pulling Down the Statue of King George III, N.Y.C. ca. 1859.jpg
2488:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2449:
2317:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2263:
2137:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2116:
2098:
2080:
2072:
2055:
2051:
1973:
1905:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1849:
1830:
1740:
1533:
1445:
1425:
1411:
1393:
1361:
1280:
1243:
1051:
996:
947:
714:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
663:
552:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
515:
498:
318:
Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
275:
219:
188:
166:
153:
2345:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
2165:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1933:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
761:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
580:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
346:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
73:
Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the category's
1865:
1809:
1787:
1765:
1725:
1689:
1615:
1465:
1375:
1347:
1338:
1306:
1224:
1150:
1075:
1024:
971:
933:
883:
743:
Knowledge:Categories for discussion/Log/2020 July 27#Category:Destroyed landmarks by country
461:
215:
1504:
and seems too vague. (Favor renaming over keeping current name if no consensus to delete.)
2425:
2298:
1258:
274:(or maybe everyone but me in this discussion is a regular there and I should butt out!)--
2466:
2093:
already serves as the topic category, so we may nominate that category for renaming to
851:
847:
482:
179:
We have a lot of very broad film categories. I think this is defining, for example for
2280:
1693:
1560:
1484:
694:
680:
532:
442:
257:
236:
125:
2024:). This being the English Knowledge, category titles should follow English usage. -
1271:
With very few exceptions, the articles are titled as the artwork, not the incident;
2112:
2076:
1751:
1736:
1685:
1529:
1441:
1407:
1357:
1276:
1239:
1047:
784:. This is without prejudice to a fresh nomination for renaming to a different name.
184:
149:
2230:
1861:
1805:
1797:
1783:
1761:
1721:
1611:
1605:
I think "political reasons" is not editor-subjective; those incidents having it
1461:
1371:
1343:
1302:
1220:
1146:
1071:
1020:
967:
929:
879:
648:
2412:
2294:
1421:
1551:
iff the scope is narrowed and the category is renamed. Maybe something like
2339:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
2159:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1927:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1653:- Widening the category to "removed" would include all statues removed for
755:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
574:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
340:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
67:
The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more categories.
1709:- So I conclude and primarily propose to move=rename this category into:
235:
This is indeed about specific families, not family as a social concept.
2013:
1988:
1671:- About '(permanently) dishonoured': I choose this wordt because it is
1329:
Category:Removed
Confederate States of America monuments and memorials
1356:
I'm ok with that, though I still prefer "statues", or "sculptures".
1657:
reasons (i.e., reason for removal is not used at all). But that is
1714:
Category:Monuments and memorials dishonoured for political reasons
946:
intends to say: do not keep the category under its current name.
1642:
an argument the concept being unacceptable for the encyclopedia
1324:
Category:Monuments and memorials removed for political reasons
1848:
No, not just each and every "removal". This line of arguing,
1236:
Category:Statues removed or destroyed for political reasons
1044:
Category:Statues removed or destroyed for political reasons
2482:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2311:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2242:- A category with one member is not useful in any way. -
2131:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
1899:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
708:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
546:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
312:
The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion.
2407:
And also any appropriate subcats under hierarchies like
828:
824:
816:
808:
1327:. This would be a more appropriate parent category to
679:
To match the actual content. 19:47, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1778:
us into a category name. If everything fails, could
1856:
reason for inclusion: "political reasons". I oppose
2496:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2353:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2325:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2173:). No further edits should be made to this section.
2145:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1941:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1913:). No further edits should be made to this section.
769:). No further edits should be made to this section.
722:). No further edits should be made to this section.
642:Better match to contents and consistency with e.g.
588:). No further edits should be made to this section.
560:). No further edits should be made to this section.
354:). No further edits should be made to this section.
326:). No further edits should be made to this section.
81:). No further edits should be made to this section.
1995:) and does not require an "s" to make it more so.
419:Category:St. Edward's Hilltoppers football seasons
407:Category:St. Edward's Hilltoppers football players
395:Category:St. Edward's Hilltoppers football coaches
1675:the opposite for the act of erecting the statue:
1217:Category:Removed or intentionally damaged statues
846:Why statues? Does that include the bas-relief on
1991:. The word is already a plural (the singular is
1483:. Statues have no honor to defend or to remove.
423:Category:St. Edward's Crusaders football seasons
411:Category:St. Edward's Crusaders football players
399:Category:St. Edward's Crusaders football coaches
119:Is this supposed to be for films that cover the
1955:could be created or a new nomination to rename
1659:missing the point for the relevant intersection
928:. Why do you not simply propose improvements? -
912:no to all of this. All of your points are just
2394:Category:21st-century American racing drivers
2382:Category:20th-century American racing drivers
2016:. Category names seem to favor plurals (e.g.
1528:are heavily concentrated on recent removals.
633:Category:Prehistoric echinoderms by continent
8:
1860:outcome of this CfD that omits this point. -
629:Category:Prehistoric echinoderms by location
1095:Robert Baden-Powell, 1st Baron Baden-Powell
916:again, not arguments. I repeat: go to the
383:Category:St. Edward's Hilltoppers football
333:Category:St. Edward's Hilltoppers football
2409:Category:American racing drivers by state
1298:
1142:
1067:
1016:
963:
2469:, is the complaint department really on
485:, is the complaint department really on
387:Category:St. Edward's Crusaders football
1987:Move to match the title of our article
1796:(ec) Discovered above: the proposal by
729:Category:Destroyed landmarks by country
254:Category:Films about real-life families
41:
33:
2218:Category:Echinoderms of South America
2206:Category:Echinoderms of South America
2111:Ok with that - so Keep for this one.
1579:Category:Removed or destroyed statues
1557:Category:Iconoclastic statue removals
1197:Category:Removed or destroyed statues
7:
332:
644:Category:Invertebrates by continent
18:Knowledge:Categories for discussion
2332:American racing drivers by century
2075:above - our standard arrangement.
2046:, we might create a split between
1215:for objectivity to something like
441:, an article I have just created.
28:
2360:The result of the discussion was:
2180:The result of the discussion was:
1948:The result of the discussion was:
1800:above is worth considering: use "
776:The result of the discussion was:
621:Category:Echinoderms by continent
595:The result of the discussion was:
361:The result of the discussion was:
88:The result of the discussion was:
2398:Category:American racing drivers
2386:Category:American racing drivers
1273:Firdos Square statue destruction
733:
617:Category:Echinoderms by location
567:Category:Echinoderms by location
439:St. Edward's Crusaders football
2022:Category:Indian capital cities
1:
2202:Category:Echinoderms of Chile
2152:Category:Echinoderms of Chile
2089:Looking at it again, in fact
1607:made into a wikipedia article
183:(I'd imagine - not seen it).
106:Category:Films about families
60:Category:Films about families
30:
2214:Category:Echinoderms of Peru
1951:do not rename, but category
1732:— 11:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1633:. (I created this category).
804:Category:Dishonoured statues
748:Category:Dishonoured statues
1334:Twelve Responses to Tragedy
110:Category:Films about family
2513:
2050:for the general topic and
1631:Keep and consider renaming
1553:Category:Statue iconoclasm
1481:Category:Destroyed statues
920:. There is a diff between
272:Knowledge:WikiProject Film
91:do not rename as nominated
2474:11:50, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
2458:04:42, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2439:04:08, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2374:17:09, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2303:11:06, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
2286:04:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
2272:20:00, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2253:18:21, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2235:05:02, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2194:17:08, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
2121:16:08, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
2107:15:52, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
2085:21:09, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2064:19:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2035:18:19, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
2005:10:40, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1966:03:36, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
1885:05:16, 22 June 2020 (UTC)
1870:19:41, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1839:14:32, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1814:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1792:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1770:12:58, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1745:12:34, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1730:10:44, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1620:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1595:19:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
1570:04:09, 14 June 2020 (UTC)
1538:21:58, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
1514:21:36, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
1493:19:51, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1470:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1450:21:59, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
1434:14:53, 13 June 2020 (UTC)
1416:14:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1402:14:37, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1380:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1366:14:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1352:10:39, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1311:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1285:14:54, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1267:10:38, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1248:01:45, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1229:01:18, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
1208:21:38, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1180:22:10, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1155:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1131:21:35, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1080:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1056:21:05, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
1029:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
1005:19:55, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
976:12:39, 20 June 2020 (UTC)
956:07:03, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
938:22:52, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
908:18:11, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
888:16:28, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
865:15:58, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
790:03:33, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
700:04:59, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
672:06:42, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
653:17:29, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
609:17:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
538:04:58, 18 June 2020 (UTC)
524:22:05, 17 June 2020 (UTC)
507:13:10, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
490:12:11, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
474:19:22, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
451:18:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
375:17:07, 19 June 2020 (UTC)
304:19:31, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
284:18:36, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
266:17:48, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
245:19:46, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
228:16:16, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
193:14:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
175:06:32, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
158:01:57, 12 June 2020 (UTC)
134:22:16, 11 June 2020 (UTC)
98:03:28, 23 June 2020 (UTC)
2485:Please do not modify it.
2342:Please do not modify it.
2314:Please do not modify it.
2162:Please do not modify it.
2134:Please do not modify it.
2091:Category:Bedouin society
2018:Category:American people
1957:Category:Bedouin society
1930:Please do not modify it.
1902:Please do not modify it.
1826:Category:Removed statues
993:Category:Removed statues
782:Category:Removed statues
758:Please do not modify it.
711:Please do not modify it.
577:Please do not modify it.
549:Please do not modify it.
343:Please do not modify it.
315:Please do not modify it.
181:Little Women (2019 film)
148:is in too many subcats.
146:Little Women (2019 film)
70:Please do not modify it.
1758:this Leopold II example
1440:Oh, it is, very often.
1040:Strong keep, but rename
962:OK, treated as such in
922:I don't understand this
434:St. Edward's University
218:). Naming is tough!--
2405:Nominator's rationale:
2225:Nominator's rationale:
1985:Nominator's rationale:
840:Nominator's rationale:
640:Nominator's rationale:
430:Nominator's rationale:
256:and purged instead? --
117:Nominator's rationale:
2054:for the biographies.
1997:Justlettersandnumbers
1703:this Churchill statue
1661:. I reject this idea.
1420:While the wp article
1099:John Maynard Friedman
850:or the sculptures on
432:The football team at
294:as part of the plot.
1782:serve the purpose? -
989:Weak keep if renamed
497:makes sense to me.--
1780:Category:Rebellions
1852:, again omits the
1802:Category:Monuments
1583:User:Verne Equinox
944:User:SummerPhDv2.0
2052:Category:Bedouins
1974:Category:Bedouins
1920:Category:Bedouins
1141:As I describe in
51:
50:
2504:
2487:
2437:
2420:
2366:Timrollpickering
2344:
2316:
2283:
2251:
2248:
2245:
2240:Merge categories
2186:Timrollpickering
2164:
2136:
2095:Category:Bedouin
2048:Category:Bedouin
2033:
2030:
2027:
1978:Category:Bedouin
1971:Propose renaming
1953:Category:Bedouin
1932:
1904:
1755:
1563:
1506:RevelationDirect
1177:
1169:
1128:
1120:
906:
903:
900:
863:
860:
857:
833:
832:
800:Propose deleting
760:
737:
736:
713:
697:
626:Propose renaming
614:Propose renaming
601:Timrollpickering
579:
551:
535:
416:Propose renaming
404:Propose renaming
392:Propose renaming
380:Propose renaming
367:Timrollpickering
345:
317:
103:Propose renaming
72:
47:
36:
31:
2512:
2511:
2507:
2506:
2505:
2503:
2502:
2501:
2500:
2494:deletion review
2483:
2423:
2414:
2391:Propose merging
2379:Propose merging
2351:deletion review
2340:
2334:
2329:
2323:deletion review
2312:
2281:
2249:
2246:
2243:
2211:Propose merging
2199:Propose merging
2171:deletion review
2160:
2154:
2149:
2143:deletion review
2132:
2031:
2028:
2025:
1963:Good Ol’factory
1939:deletion review
1928:
1922:
1917:
1911:deletion review
1900:
1749:
1561:
1339:Poets' Fountain
1213:Keep and rename
1193:Keep and rename
1173:
1165:
1124:
1116:
904:
901:
898:
861:
858:
855:
806:
802:
787:Good Ol’factory
767:deletion review
756:
750:
734:
731:
726:
720:deletion review
709:
695:
586:deletion review
575:
569:
564:
558:deletion review
547:
533:
352:deletion review
341:
335:
330:
324:deletion review
313:
216:Children's film
95:Good Ol’factory
79:deletion review
68:
62:
57:
52:
45:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2510:
2508:
2499:
2498:
2478:
2477:
2476:
2465:per nominator.
2460:
2442:
2441:
2402:
2401:
2400:
2388:
2356:
2355:
2335:
2333:
2330:
2328:
2327:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2288:
2274:
2256:
2255:
2237:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2208:
2176:
2175:
2155:
2153:
2150:
2148:
2147:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2123:
2087:
2066:
2040:
2039:
2038:
2037:
1982:
1981:
1980:
1944:
1943:
1923:
1921:
1918:
1916:
1915:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1891:
1890:
1889:
1888:
1887:
1877:Carlossuarez46
1843:
1842:
1821:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1816:
1794:
1718:
1710:
1707:
1669:
1662:
1651:
1648:
1635:
1634:
1627:
1626:
1625:
1624:
1623:
1622:
1598:
1597:
1587:Carlossuarez46
1572:
1545:
1544:
1543:
1542:
1541:
1540:
1517:
1516:
1495:
1474:
1473:
1472:
1458:
1457:
1456:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1382:
1318:
1317:
1316:
1315:
1314:
1313:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1210:
1189:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1184:
1183:
1182:
1134:
1133:
1106:
1087:
1086:
1085:
1084:
1083:
1082:
1066:Is closest to
1059:
1058:
1042:, perhaps to
1036:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1008:
1007:
985:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
978:
959:
958:
875:
874:
852:Mount Rushmore
848:Stone Mountain
844:
843:
837:
836:
835:
834:
794:
793:
792:
772:
771:
751:
749:
746:
730:
727:
725:
724:
704:
703:
702:
688:
674:
656:
655:
637:
636:
635:
623:
591:
590:
570:
568:
565:
563:
562:
542:
541:
540:
526:
509:
492:
481:per nominator.
476:
454:
453:
427:
426:
425:
413:
401:
389:
357:
356:
336:
334:
331:
329:
328:
308:
307:
306:
296:Carlossuarez46
288:
287:
286:
247:
230:
211:The Roosevelts
197:
196:
195:
160:
137:
136:
114:
113:
112:
84:
83:
63:
61:
58:
56:
53:
49:
48:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2509:
2497:
2495:
2491:
2486:
2480:
2479:
2475:
2472:
2468:
2464:
2461:
2459:
2455:
2451:
2447:
2444:
2443:
2440:
2435:
2431:
2427:
2422:
2418:
2410:
2406:
2403:
2399:
2395:
2392:
2389:
2387:
2383:
2380:
2377:
2376:
2375:
2371:
2367:
2364:
2361:
2358:
2357:
2354:
2352:
2348:
2343:
2337:
2336:
2331:
2326:
2324:
2320:
2315:
2309:
2308:
2304:
2300:
2296:
2292:
2289:
2287:
2284:
2278:
2275:
2273:
2269:
2265:
2261:
2258:
2257:
2254:
2241:
2238:
2236:
2233:
2232:
2226:
2223:
2219:
2215:
2212:
2209:
2207:
2203:
2200:
2197:
2196:
2195:
2191:
2187:
2184:
2181:
2178:
2177:
2174:
2172:
2168:
2163:
2157:
2156:
2151:
2146:
2144:
2140:
2135:
2129:
2128:
2122:
2118:
2114:
2110:
2109:
2108:
2104:
2100:
2096:
2092:
2088:
2086:
2082:
2078:
2074:
2070:
2067:
2065:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2042:
2041:
2036:
2023:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2010:Do not rename
2008:
2007:
2006:
2002:
1998:
1994:
1990:
1986:
1983:
1979:
1975:
1972:
1969:
1968:
1967:
1964:
1960:
1958:
1954:
1949:
1946:
1945:
1942:
1940:
1936:
1931:
1925:
1924:
1919:
1914:
1912:
1908:
1903:
1897:
1896:
1886:
1882:
1878:
1873:
1872:
1871:
1867:
1863:
1859:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1846:
1845:
1844:
1840:
1836:
1832:
1827:
1823:
1822:
1815:
1811:
1807:
1803:
1799:
1795:
1793:
1789:
1785:
1781:
1777:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1753:
1748:
1747:
1746:
1742:
1738:
1734:
1733:
1731:
1727:
1723:
1719:
1716:
1715:
1711:
1708:
1704:
1700:
1695:
1691:
1687:
1682:
1678:
1674:
1670:
1667:
1663:
1660:
1656:
1652:
1649:
1647:
1644:
1641:
1637:
1636:
1632:
1629:
1628:
1621:
1617:
1613:
1608:
1604:
1603:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1599:
1596:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1580:
1576:
1573:
1571:
1568:
1566:
1564:
1558:
1554:
1550:
1547:
1546:
1539:
1535:
1531:
1527:
1526:with articles
1523:
1522:
1521:
1520:
1519:
1518:
1515:
1511:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1496:
1494:
1490:
1486:
1482:
1478:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1463:
1459:
1451:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1438:
1437:
1436:
1435:
1431:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1413:
1409:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1399:
1395:
1390:
1387:
1381:
1377:
1373:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1354:
1353:
1349:
1345:
1340:
1336:
1335:
1330:
1326:
1325:
1320:
1319:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1295:
1294:
1293:
1292:
1291:
1286:
1282:
1278:
1274:
1270:
1269:
1268:
1264:
1260:
1256:
1253:
1249:
1245:
1241:
1237:
1232:
1231:
1230:
1226:
1222:
1218:
1214:
1211:
1209:
1205:
1201:
1200:Verne Equinox
1198:
1194:
1191:
1190:
1181:
1178:
1176:
1170:
1168:
1163:
1162:SportingFlyer
1158:
1157:
1156:
1152:
1148:
1144:
1140:
1139:
1138:
1137:
1136:
1135:
1132:
1129:
1127:
1121:
1119:
1114:
1113:SportingFlyer
1110:
1109:Strong rename
1107:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1092:
1089:
1088:
1081:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1064:
1063:
1062:
1061:
1060:
1057:
1053:
1049:
1045:
1041:
1038:
1037:
1030:
1026:
1022:
1018:
1014:
1013:
1012:
1011:
1010:
1009:
1006:
1002:
998:
994:
990:
987:
986:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
960:
957:
953:
949:
945:
941:
940:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
919:
915:
911:
910:
909:
895:
891:
890:
889:
885:
881:
877:
876:
872:
869:
868:
867:
866:
853:
849:
841:
838:
830:
826:
822:
818:
814:
810:
805:
801:
798:
797:
796:
795:
791:
788:
785:
783:
777:
774:
773:
770:
768:
764:
759:
753:
752:
747:
745:
744:
740:
728:
723:
721:
717:
712:
706:
705:
701:
698:
692:
689:
686:
682:
678:
675:
673:
669:
665:
661:
658:
657:
654:
651:
650:
645:
641:
638:
634:
630:
627:
624:
622:
618:
615:
612:
611:
610:
606:
602:
599:
596:
593:
592:
589:
587:
583:
578:
572:
571:
566:
561:
559:
555:
550:
544:
543:
539:
536:
530:
527:
525:
521:
517:
513:
510:
508:
504:
500:
499:Paul McDonald
496:
493:
491:
488:
484:
480:
477:
475:
471:
467:
463:
459:
456:
455:
452:
448:
444:
440:
435:
431:
428:
424:
420:
417:
414:
412:
408:
405:
402:
400:
396:
393:
390:
388:
384:
381:
378:
377:
376:
372:
368:
365:
362:
359:
358:
355:
353:
349:
344:
338:
337:
327:
325:
321:
316:
310:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
289:
285:
281:
277:
276:Paul McDonald
273:
269:
268:
267:
263:
259:
255:
251:
248:
246:
242:
238:
234:
231:
229:
225:
221:
220:Paul McDonald
217:
213:
212:
207:
206:
201:
198:
194:
190:
186:
182:
178:
177:
176:
172:
168:
164:
161:
159:
155:
151:
147:
142:
139:
138:
135:
131:
127:
122:
118:
115:
111:
107:
104:
101:
100:
99:
96:
92:
89:
86:
85:
82:
80:
76:
71:
65:
64:
59:
54:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
2484:
2481:
2462:
2450:Marcocapelle
2445:
2416:
2404:
2390:
2378:
2362:
2359:
2341:
2338:
2313:
2310:
2290:
2276:
2264:Marcocapelle
2259:
2239:
2229:
2224:
2210:
2198:
2182:
2179:
2161:
2158:
2133:
2130:
2099:Marcocapelle
2073:Marcocapelle
2068:
2056:Marcocapelle
2043:
2009:
1992:
1984:
1970:
1959:could follow
1950:
1947:
1929:
1926:
1901:
1898:
1857:
1854:encyclopedic
1853:
1850:Marcocapelle
1831:Marcocapelle
1801:
1775:
1712:
1699:WP:TERRORIST
1676:
1672:
1654:
1646:
1643:
1640:I have found
1639:
1630:
1606:
1574:
1548:
1525:
1497:
1476:
1426:Marcocapelle
1394:Marcocapelle
1388:
1332:
1321:
1254:
1212:
1192:
1172:
1164:
1123:
1115:
1108:
1090:
1039:
997:Marcocapelle
988:
948:Marcocapelle
925:
921:
913:
893:
870:
845:
839:
799:
778:
775:
757:
754:
738:
732:
710:
707:
693:per above --
690:
676:
664:Marcocapelle
659:
647:
639:
625:
613:
597:
594:
576:
573:
548:
545:
528:
516:SportsGuy789
511:
494:
478:
457:
429:
415:
403:
391:
379:
363:
360:
342:
339:
314:
311:
290:
249:
232:
209:
203:
199:
167:Marcocapelle
162:
140:
120:
116:
102:
90:
87:
69:
66:
2279:per nom. --
1798:User:Ham II
1091:Strong keep
942:Presumably
531:per nom. --
462:KingSkyLord
2467:...William
1422:Iconoclasm
1259:Rathfelder
483:...William
2490:talk page
2471:the roof?
2347:talk page
2319:talk page
2293:per nom.
2167:talk page
2139:talk page
1935:talk page
1907:talk page
1706:reason").
1690:WP:FRINGE
1677:honouring
914:questions
763:talk page
716:talk page
582:talk page
554:talk page
487:the roof?
460:per nom.
348:talk page
320:talk page
75:talk page
2492:or in a
2413:Justin (
2349:or in a
2321:or in a
2282:Lenticel
2169:or in a
2141:or in a
1937:or in a
1909:or in a
1562:gobonobo
1485:Dimadick
1322:Move to
1299:my reply
1143:my reply
1068:my reply
1017:my reply
964:my reply
918:talkpage
765:or in a
739:Relisted
718:or in a
696:Lenticel
681:Dimadick
584:or in a
556:or in a
534:Lenticel
470:contribs
443:Jweiss11
350:or in a
322:or in a
258:Paul_012
237:Dimadick
144:example
126:Paul_012
77:or in a
20: |
2446:Support
2291:Support
2277:Support
2260:Support
2113:Johnbod
2077:Johnbod
2071:as per
2044:Comment
2014:Bedouin
1989:Bedouin
1804:...". -
1752:Johnbod
1737:Johnbod
1673:exactly
1530:Johnbod
1442:Johnbod
1408:Johnbod
1389:Comment
1358:Johnbod
1277:Johnbod
1255:Delete.
1240:Johnbod
1070:. :-) -
1048:Johnbod
871:Comment
817:history
691:Support
677:Support
660:Support
529:Support
512:Support
495:Support
479:Support
458:Support
250:Comment
185:Johnbod
163:Comment
150:Johnbod
121:concept
55:June 11
43:June 12
38:June 10
2231:DexDor
1993:badawi
1862:DePiep
1806:DePiep
1784:DePiep
1762:DePiep
1722:DePiep
1694:WP:DUE
1612:DePiep
1575:Rename
1498:Delete
1462:DePiep
1372:DePiep
1344:Ham II
1303:DePiep
1221:Beland
1147:DePiep
1072:DePiep
1021:DePiep
968:DePiep
930:DePiep
880:DePiep
741:, see
649:DexDor
598:Rename
364:Rename
291:Delete
233:Oppose
200:Oppose
141:Oppose
2463:Merge
2363:Merge
2295:Oculi
2183:Merge
2069:Split
1776:force
1686:WP:RS
1655:other
1219:. --
825:watch
821:links
205:Roots
46:: -->
16:<
2454:talk
2370:talk
2299:talk
2268:talk
2190:talk
2117:talk
2103:talk
2081:talk
2060:talk
2001:talk
1881:talk
1866:talk
1835:talk
1810:talk
1788:talk
1766:talk
1741:talk
1726:talk
1681:this
1666:this
1616:talk
1591:talk
1581:per
1549:Keep
1534:talk
1510:talk
1489:talk
1477:Move
1466:talk
1446:talk
1430:talk
1412:talk
1398:talk
1376:talk
1362:talk
1348:talk
1307:talk
1281:talk
1263:talk
1244:talk
1225:talk
1204:talk
1151:talk
1103:talk
1076:talk
1052:talk
1025:talk
1001:talk
972:talk
952:talk
934:talk
924:and
894:that
884:talk
829:logs
813:talk
809:edit
685:talk
668:talk
605:talk
520:talk
503:talk
466:talk
447:talk
371:talk
300:talk
280:talk
262:talk
241:talk
224:talk
189:talk
171:talk
154:talk
130:talk
35:<
2396:to
2384:to
2250:PhD
2247:mer
2244:Sum
2216:to
2204:to
2032:PhD
2029:mer
2026:Sum
1976:to
1858:any
1841:CfD
1577:to
1555:or
1479:to
1301:. -
1195:to
1019:. -
991:to
966:. -
926:CfD
905:PhD
902:mer
899:Sum
862:PhD
859:mer
856:Sum
631:to
619:to
421:to
409:to
397:to
385:to
208:or
108:to
22:Log
2456:)
2419:vf
2415:ko
2372:)
2301:)
2270:)
2192:)
2119:)
2105:)
2097:.
2083:)
2062:)
2020:,
2003:)
1961:.
1883:)
1868:)
1837:)
1812:)
1790:)
1768:)
1743:)
1728:)
1692:,
1688:,
1618:)
1593:)
1559:.
1536:)
1512:)
1491:)
1468:)
1448:)
1432:)
1414:)
1400:)
1378:)
1364:)
1350:)
1309:)
1283:)
1265:)
1246:)
1227:)
1206:)
1153:)
1078:)
1054:)
1027:)
1003:)
974:)
954:)
936:)
886:)
827:|
823:|
819:|
815:|
811:|
670:)
646:.
607:)
522:)
505:)
472:)
468:|
449:)
373:)
302:)
282:)
264:)
243:)
226:)
191:)
173:)
156:)
132:)
93:.
2452:(
2436:☯
2434:M
2432:☺
2430:C
2428:☮
2426:T
2424:❤
2421:)
2417:a
2368:(
2297:(
2266:(
2188:(
2115:(
2101:(
2079:(
2058:(
1999:(
1879:(
1864:(
1833:(
1808:(
1786:(
1764:(
1754::
1750:@
1739:(
1724:(
1720:-
1717:.
1614:(
1589:(
1532:(
1508:(
1487:(
1464:(
1444:(
1428:(
1410:(
1396:(
1374:(
1360:(
1346:(
1305:(
1279:(
1261:(
1242:(
1223:(
1202:(
1175:C
1171:·
1167:T
1149:(
1126:C
1122:·
1118:T
1105:)
1101:(
1074:(
1050:(
1023:(
999:(
970:(
950:(
932:(
882:(
831:)
807:(
687:)
683:(
666:(
603:(
518:(
501:(
464:(
445:(
369:(
298:(
278:(
260:(
239:(
222:(
187:(
169:(
152:(
128:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.