Knowledge (XXG):Cherrypicking

548:

especially true of scholarship. For example, for a peer-reviewed publication, a scholarly mathematician should know the consensus of mathematical knowledge on a topic or should not publish at all on that topic. However, Knowledge (XXG) has no such requirement for its editors. An editor who knows just one fact and just one source about it is allowed to add the fact and the source to Knowledge (XXG), as long as all policies and guidelines are satisfied, and other editors can separately add more facts and sources from their knowledge. We strive to reach the state where the article as a whole is not the result of cherrypicking of some sources from many sources; for example, neutrality or due weight may require it, but an individual editor is not required to be neutral, only the article is, and an article's neutrality and balancing of weight are often achieved by adding content, without necessarily deleting other content. Our concern against cherrypicking when editing a Knowledge (XXG) article is generally against cherrypicking specifically from within a single source.

429:, database copies, and library hard copies of a newspaper are limited to one edition per day, and that is not necessarily the last edition. Some newspapers that maintain their own websites may choose to put the latest version on the website, and sometimes corrections are even added days or weeks later, but that is not guaranteed. Databases may or may not be updated to match newspapers' own websites, since database publishers are often separate from newspaper publishers, even if they are connected by contract. In any case, we use what is available, and, if we have a choice, we should use the best available, and we cite what we use. 409:

corrected between printings even if they're of the same edition. Unfortunately, library catalogues often do not indicate what printing is in a library, differentiating only between editions. It is possible that, for current editions of modern books, libraries tend to buy first printings whereas bookstores may stock more recent printings, although you may have to visit in person to find out. Printings are often marked in a modern book on the copyright page but only in a code, such as a line that says only "1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10" or perhaps "10 9 8 7 6 5 4", in which the smallest number visible is often the printing number.

464:

and not to add Washington's. However, if another editor adds Washington's view, you may not delete it on the grounds that you disagree. No matter how sure you are that Washington is wrong to the bone, leave the content and the citation in place. What you may do is add a source that disputes Washington's view. This is consistent with Knowledge (XXG) being a work continually undergoing improvement and no editor is required to know or believe every source. Thus, to choose one source and not another is not cherrypicking from one source.

123: 650:, article), I argue now that doubtless someone besides Keynes said it and, given the content and if said by enough people, doubtless a scholar said it and it's useful and harmless to include it here (in a non-article) with the qualification, rather than write it in my own words and less wittily, somewhat as if I invented the notion. If an attribution to a presumably now-anonymous scholar can be provided, it'll be good to add it. 442:

ethology is reliable, that author's view has changed and the later view is authoritative, regardless of which edition was first or third. However, if a distinction can be found between two views about one subject, both would be authoritative for that author and we would not report a change. If the distinction is minor, the earlier view may not be entitled to weight in Knowledge (XXG).

379:

past. While an individual editor is not required to know all of the significant sources on a subject, it is helpful if you do, or if you know at least some of them. Therefore, if you are familiar with a different and unused source that should be used, feel free to edit an article consistently with the different source, if the source is otherwise eligible to be used in Knowledge (XXG).

505:

it from the same sourcing that you believe was cherrypicked by another editor, you should be able to find evidence of cherrypicking. Speculation is not an acceptable ground for continuing to challenge content as cherrypicked. In general, the better course is to find any contradictory or significant qualifying information yourself and to edit the page to reflect what you have found.

218:

cherrypicking words with the effect of changing the meaning of what the source is saying. It is cherrypicking even if the source is precisely cited. It is still cherrypicking even if the editor meant well in changing the meaning; the issue is not the editor's intention, but how the Knowledge (XXG) article represents the source's meaning.

270:

work has not less than the highest quality, but neither artist knows about the other, so neither one is criticizing the other. In effect, the book is a source that contains multiple sources, which you can treat separately. If you're editing an article about artist B but not about artist A, you don't have to report what artist A said.

31: 527:

denied that superiority. This can happen because a publisher wants a catchier title in order to encourage more sales, and some publishing contracts take control of the titles away from the authors. We do not ordinarily report a fact on the basis of a book title alone, but in a case like this we would be especially unlikely to do so.

108: 366:

source has several volumes, consider all the volumes. That kind of source may have relevant content sprinkled across all the volumes. You may have to read all of them. For some, searching the index (even reading the whole index from A to Z) is needed. For some, you'll need to search online inside a source for various terms.

563:

is 'selecting relevant information and not selecting irrelevant information'. We're supposed to do that when writing for Knowledge (XXG). For example, if you're writing an article about one person and basing it on a source about that person's family, you generally should select only information about

151:

often means selecting from the general range of sources on a topic so as to misrepresent a consensus or to misrepresent what has been published. For that, the remedy is to edit to reflect what another editor missed, because we don't expect an editor to know all the sources on a topic or even all of a

513:

Contradiction may justify deleting contradicted information more weakly sourced, but often it justifies presenting both sides of a topic, as by leaving intact the original statement and adding a new statement, so readers can know multiple perspectives. Which course to follow depends on the case, but

463:

Suppose Smith wrote a book with one view and Washington wrote another book with a contradictory view. Suppose you agree with Smith but not with Washington. Provided they came from different sources, e.g. different books or different websites, when you edit an article, you're free to add Smith's view

399:

It may be appropriate to cite an older edition even when a newer edition is also being cited, or instead of a newer edition, but this would be rare. The older information would have to be entitled to weight apart from the newer. One case is when writing about the historical development of an idea or

395:

Citing multiple editions in one article is permissible if the content is sourced to multiple editions. A statement being kept and which is supported by an older edition should continue to be supported by the older edition in a citation, unless an editor has found that the newer edition also supports

391:

If an editor finds that a later edition contradicts or qualifies an earlier edition that was cited in Knowledge (XXG), the editor who found it should treat the newer edition as if it is a separate source and edit the Knowledge (XXG) article, perhaps replacing or editing old content and old citations

387:

A later edition of a work usually replaces all earlier editions. Earlier editions are usually not authoritative as sourcing against later editions. However, an editor may not know of a newer edition or may not have access to it. Therefore, it generally is not cherrypicking to get information from an

282:

Some subjects are grounded in critique of society or of another subject. For instance, a belief system may contradict another. Given that a Knowledge (XXG) article is about only one subject, not every contradiction from outside of that subject need be reported, but substantial contradiction probably

238:

Earlier and later within a single source is generally not earlier or later in time. Exceptions may occur if a single source presents chronologically ordered material, such as an anthology of dated writings, a history, or a biography. However, even if an author is known to complete the writing of one

230:

Politics is a field in which changing one's mind is commonly criticized, at least in the United States. A claim is that a lack of consistency over time may make a candidate less trustworthy. However, while that may be more relevant to electing one or another candidate, it is less relevant to editing

504:

to persist in claiming that cherrypicking occurred unless evidence of it has been uncovered. You may know a subject very well and believe an article to be erroneous, but either you know it from other sourcing (but a conflict between multiple sources is not evidence of cherrypicking) or, if you know

420:

Newspapers traditionally have idiosyncratic ways of labeling different editions in the course of a day, especially in past decades, so that the labels may not make clear which is earlier or later, especially to an out-of-town reader. Additionally, the publisher may arbitrarily designate one edition

356:

On the other hand, merely additional information does not have to be provided. For example, if a source says "brain surgery is difficult" and goes on to state the experience of a surgeon who performed it without changing the meaning of the main information, the surgeon's experience does not have to

347:

Either contradictory or qualifying information may be found anywhere in a source, not necessarily adjacent to the main information. For example, while the main information may be in a middle chapter of a book, contradictory or qualifying information may be in an endnote, in an introduction, or on a

335:

Qualifying information is information that might not contradict the main information but that alters how the main information should be understood. For example, to quote a source that says that most Americans sleep late and skip work but to ignore that the source limits that by saying "on weekends"

226:

Timing matters. A statement at a given point in time may contradict any statement that was made earlier in time. However, a statement that is earlier in time does not contradict a later statement, even by the same person. Anyone is permitted to change their views. Generally, it does not discredit a

141:

If you are familiar with multiple credible sources on a subject and they are significantly different from each other, you may realize that Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines support reporting from some or all of the sources, and you should edit accordingly. If one editor is not familiar with

547:

has a wider meaning that is not entirely useful for the editing of Knowledge (XXG). In those outside media, authors may be expected to have sufficient knowledge of a subject to refrain from misrepresenting the state of knowledge by cherrypicking sources from all the sources on the subject. This is

526:

A book's title appears to be a statement of fact but the author, inside the book or elsewhere, denies what the title says is correct as a statement of fact. This did happen with one book, the title of which placed one class of people as superior to another class, whereas inside the book the author

482:

A consensus in a field or discipline is not usually the responsibility of one author, even if the author is an especially influential leader. A change in that consensus, such as on whether light needs ether as a medium for travel, is reportable in Knowledge (XXG) when sourcing reflecting consensus

408:

Printings and impressions may be treated like editions for these editorial purposes. Although in the U.S. different printings of one edition tend to be identical or very similar, generally there is no law requiring that and they may differ in any way a publisher wishes. For instance, errors may be

378:

However, an article as a whole should reflect the range of sources available on the article's subject. This does not require using every source that exists, just that the sourcing cited be reasonably representative of the range of sources that exist. This applies regardless of who edited it in the

365:

While Knowledge (XXG) may consider a "source" to be just p.32 of a certain book, to prevent cherrypicking you should consider a source in its larger sense. While many sources are organized for speedy lookups, some are not or your interest may not allow looking in just one place. For instance, if a

313:

Different fields of study have points of disagreement with each other. Even if the same author writes on multiple fields or disciplines in a single source, a Knowledge (XXG) article within one field of scholarship generally does not have to report contradictions emanating solely from other fields,

273:

This can be a difficult concept to apply with integrity and consistency. It is easier if a book is an anthology, but it can be true of many other books as well. For example, it is common for journalists to interview multiple sources for one book; and many studies and surveys in the social sciences

269:

Suppose one book has several in-depth profiles of different artists. According to the book, artist A says it's necessary to schedule four hours a day to paint in order to produce masterpieces but artist B says one should never schedule time for painting but should instead await inspiration, so the

522:

A book says that according to one religion only persons A, B, and C are prophets but according to another religion only persons D, E, and F are prophets. Although that is contradictory, in an article about both religions both statements should be reported, perhaps in the form of a fully disclosed

321:

Linguists tend not to rank cultures as dominant versus subcultural or as developed versus underdeveloped while sociologists tend to do exactly that, not because one is ignorantly insensitive and the other is cruelly chauvinist but because linguists need to learn the languages and ranking does not

518:

An author says something is true and a year later retracts the statement. Usually, report only the later statement or nothing at all. The exception would be if the earlier statement remains especially notorious after the retraction and must be discussed even though it was retracted, but that is

451:

Editors should not be considered like authors, even if an editor's name is more prominent than that of any author. Generally, what is published is the view or intellectual responsibility of an author and may or may not be that of an editor. An editor may even approve the publication of directly

374:

When editing Knowledge (XXG), it's not cherrypicking in general to miss contradictory or qualifying information from a different source than a source that had information already being used, because we don't expect editors to be familiar with all of the possible sources that could be cited on a

239:

chapter before beginning research for the next, do not assume that earlier or later in a source equates with earlier or later in time unless the source's content makes that chronological ordering clear. Even in sources that appear to rely on chronology, be careful about literary devices such as

441:

do not matter because any later work that contradicts or qualifies any earlier work replaces the earlier work as authority. For example, if an author wrote in 1993 in the third edition of a Paris travel guide that ethology is wholly nonsense but in 2002 in the first edition of a cookbook that

217:

As to contradictory information that needs to be reported in Knowledge (XXG), if, for example, a source says "Charlie loves all blue coats and hates all red coats", to report in Knowledge (XXG) that according to that source "Charlie loves all... coats" is cherrypicking from the source. It is

3117: 201:

Not all information must be presented. A source must be fairly represented for the purpose of the article and that includes contradictory and qualifying information, but, other than that, information need not be added if (for example) it is not due the weight or is redundant.

1157: 593: 2318: 400:

of an author's views. Another case is when two editions of the same work are actually about different subjects; an example is with some popular guides to computer software, where an older edition of a book may be about an older version of the same software.

499:

It is legitimate to ask on a page's talk page once about whether cherrypicking occurred in a specific case. If your question is based on speculation, that is where you may speculate, and even then only if reasonable. Beyond that, however, it is against

325:

A scientist may be expected to start with a hypothesis and challenge it with a scientific investigation to ensure thoroughness while a lawyer or detective may be expected to start with no hypothesis and find what a forensic investigation yields free of

138:, in a negative sense, means selecting information without including contradictory or significant qualifying information from the same source and consequently misrepresenting what the source says. This applies both to quotations and to paraphrasings. 1722: 1187: 3004: 227:

person that they reject older views, or probably most research scientists would have no credibility. One scholar reputedly said, when challenged about changing his mind, "When the facts change, I change my mind. What do you do, sir?"

2453: 2884: 2056: 2413: 375:

topic. Therefore, to have gotten information from one source without acknowledging that it was contradicted or qualified in another source is not a valid criticism of an editor's work in Knowledge (XXG) as cherrypicking.

2222: 1817: 3257: 1524: 3197: 2944: 396:

the statement, in which case updating the citation to reflect the newer edition is helpful, or that the newer edition contradicts the statement, in which case the statement and the citation should both be updated.

2565: 1202: 3267: 3009: 869: 3533: 3528: 2819: 336:

is to omit qualifying information and misrepresent the source on Americans' work customs. While qualifying information is infinite and cannot all be quoted or paraphrased, if it is significant, include it.

3322: 1622: 738:

Reportedly, the old consensus was affirmative; Einstein disagreed; and some scientists questioned or denied Einstein's view for a few decades. Einstein's view survived as the new consensus of the field.

3307: 3057: 1597: 3645: 322:

provide much help to that end while sociologists specifically study relationships between peoples and thus study rankings without necessarily agreeing with those rankings in their own value systems.

1652: 1349: 3327: 2734: 1920: 1374: 1297: 879: 1499: 929: 919: 467:

If Smith's and Washington's views are in the same source, you must report both views, and not only the one you agree with. They're in the same source and you may not cherrypick from a source.

339:

This example of qualifying information is from a book: "I have taken artistic license in conveying both reality and essence" and "ome conversations... are not intended... as verbatim quotes."

2774: 2754: 1717: 1687: 173:(policy): Neutral point of view, by selectively presenting one point of view from available reliable sources that actually support two or more points of view that may conflict with each other 999: 596:(using these sources is not cherrypicking in the negative sense discussed in this essay but some editorial decisions in creating these sources may be akin to cherrypicking by other people) 2011: 1737: 1014: 954: 1087: 3472: 1419: 2779: 448:

Anthologies should be considered as collections in which each contribution has its own authorship, whether that results in all the contributions having the same or different authors.

2859: 2814: 2724: 2674: 1940: 1667: 1642: 231:

an article. We may report that a candidate held one view at one time and another view at another time, sourcing each view, or report only one view if that is all that is entitled to

3581: 3367: 1657: 1292: 1277: 989: 142:

some sources, another editor who is can edit accordingly. Irrespective of one editor's views, an article as a whole needs to conform to Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines.

2694: 1257: 152:

consensus. Our concern within Knowledge (XXG) is about cherrypicking from within a source or closely-related multiple sources, and an editor should be careful in handling that.

523:

disagreement. The reason is that the book is itself relying on two other sources, each of which may be authoritative for its own subject but not for the other source's subject.

3635: 2849: 2764: 1880: 1732: 1637: 1252: 1212: 1067: 3640: 3477: 2570: 2483: 2081: 1822: 1647: 1572: 1307: 1282: 1207: 819: 778: 2458: 2403: 2388: 2904: 2854: 2709: 2001: 1339: 1222: 1102: 2141: 1519: 3437: 2066: 1812: 1549: 1474: 1044: 2121: 235:

in the article, but generally the view that came later in time is not contradicted by the view that came earlier in time for purposes of reporting in Knowledge (XXG).

3332: 2984: 2829: 2749: 2418: 2167: 2096: 1950: 1247: 163:

The main information from a source, insofar as stated in Knowledge (XXG), must be accompanied by any contradictory and qualifying information from the same source.

3377: 2934: 1632: 1509: 1399: 1302: 1287: 1514: 889: 2919: 2889: 2699: 2448: 2443: 1980: 1429: 1384: 1314: 3457: 2136: 3625: 3232: 1677: 1052: 766: 3317: 1034: 3187: 3062: 1082: 2949: 2664: 2061: 1747: 1529: 1359: 1272: 874: 1807: 1024: 3538: 2839: 2799: 2513: 2126: 2046: 1562: 1464: 1394: 1182: 274:

report what respondents said, and the result may be people disagreeing with each other without knowing about each other, thus not criticizing each other.

3427: 2999: 2182: 3620: 2679: 2116: 1862: 1354: 894: 130:

for an article, without seeing the true meaning of the source. Likewise, some people will select only red cherries or dark purple cherries from a farm.

2478: 2423: 2393: 864: 3147: 3067: 1930: 194: 3462: 3432: 3222: 3202: 2759: 2428: 2383: 2378: 2187: 2071: 1975: 1712: 1424: 1369: 1324: 1262: 1232: 1137: 1127: 899: 3242: 2744: 1344: 1029: 3630: 3397: 3272: 3122: 2844: 2540: 2348: 2227: 2076: 1672: 1494: 1444: 984: 116:

Do not cherrypick. When selecting information from a source, include contradictory and significant qualifying information from the same source.

3412: 3352: 3277: 2769: 2739: 2659: 2488: 1459: 1449: 1414: 1227: 1132: 854: 3452: 3422: 3287: 3262: 3142: 2914: 2373: 2282: 2242: 2146: 1802: 1787: 1662: 1267: 1117: 1072: 1004: 964: 814: 46:

It contains the advice or opinions of one or more Knowledge (XXG) contributors. This page is not an encyclopedia article, nor is it one of

3564: 3392: 3372: 3297: 3292: 2864: 2353: 1996: 1905: 1767: 1702: 1612: 1602: 1577: 1539: 1534: 1469: 1237: 1197: 1142: 47: 1850: 460:

Different sources may sometimes be treated differently. A case where this would be appropriate may be shown with a hypothetical example:

2468: 2131: 1960: 3586: 2989: 2277: 2262: 2177: 1752: 1097: 844: 839: 3382: 3192: 3162: 3127: 2954: 2433: 2343: 2257: 1900: 1870: 1742: 924: 564:

the one person and ignore most information about most other people, even though they're all extensively detailed in the same source.

232: 182: 170: 1019: 667: 3548: 3417: 3247: 2974: 2874: 2684: 2560: 2473: 2438: 2363: 2333: 2197: 2031: 2021: 1970: 1797: 1782: 1707: 1479: 1329: 1172: 959: 904: 829: 759: 588: 348:

cover. Many sources are well organized and make finding everything you need relatively simple, but not all sources are so helpful.

211: 176: 2463: 2358: 2323: 1152: 631: 3523: 3337: 3252: 3014: 2959: 2879: 2834: 2789: 2784: 2669: 2503: 2298: 2006: 1827: 1607: 1582: 1489: 1484: 1364: 994: 909: 824: 3518: 2714: 2398: 3574: 3347: 3227: 3107: 3082: 2909: 2545: 2508: 2498: 2101: 2041: 1895: 1192: 1167: 1122: 974: 949: 939: 914: 243:

in biographies, as where a military veteran has a flashback to a wartime experience, as they can make chronologies uncertain.

3467: 3282: 3167: 3092: 2979: 2899: 2869: 2719: 2338: 2308: 2272: 2162: 2026: 1945: 1727: 1592: 1557: 1404: 1162: 1112: 1107: 834: 578: 501: 17: 1890: 1077: 3569: 3157: 3152: 3112: 3097: 3087: 2964: 2809: 2217: 2207: 2106: 1915: 1777: 1062: 934: 3615: 3543: 3500: 3312: 3177: 3077: 3037: 2994: 2939: 2929: 2924: 2894: 2729: 2704: 2689: 2644: 2530: 2252: 2192: 1925: 1762: 1697: 1692: 1682: 1434: 1057: 809: 791: 752: 188: 3217: 3172: 2535: 2408: 2368: 2172: 1910: 1439: 884: 531:

Qualification probably does not require deletion or even debate, as long as significant qualifications are reported.

725: 127: 3447: 3387: 3362: 3302: 3212: 3207: 2794: 2611: 2313: 2303: 2091: 2086: 1504: 1177: 979: 388:

earlier edition and not from a later edition. (An editor with a later edition is encouraged to edit accordingly.)

179:(policy): No original research, by presenting a statement not supported by any source, not even the cited sourcing 185:(policy): Not giving undue weight to a view, by omitting information that shows that it is relatively unimportant 3407: 3357: 3137: 3132: 3102: 2591: 2555: 2550: 2247: 2051: 1885: 1409: 1242: 1217: 1092: 711:(https://archive.org/) (this also has old Web pages), and paid-for databases (often free in libraries) such as 426: 191:(guideline): Not giving a fringe view undue weight, by omitting information that shows that it is a fringe view 147: 3402: 2969: 2824: 2237: 2232: 2016: 1935: 1792: 1454: 859: 3342: 2804: 2601: 2525: 1389: 1334: 1319: 849: 606: 3442: 3052: 2621: 2596: 2575: 1955: 1587: 1379: 944: 476: 284: 51: 646:, June 25, 2011, 3:14 a.m.) and, given that Google said it turned up 441,000 matches for the quotation ( 240: 2616: 2606: 2520: 2493: 1757: 1009: 583: 296: 252: 61: 3072: 2036: 1875: 1772: 969: 483:

has reported that change, but one author's change of view usually is not a change in the consensus.

627: 491:

Cherrypicking should not be done, regardless of whether the result is a quotation or a paraphrase.

2212: 2202: 2111: 775: 197:(guideline): Not using an unreliable source, by omitting information that would show unreliability 39: 594:

Knowledge (XXG):Children's, adult new reader, and large print sources questionable on reliability

1965: 318:

A theologian and a mathematician may contradict each other on the role of a deity in arithmetic.

696: 664: 122: 3237: 3182: 2328: 2267: 1567: 445:

Coauthors who form a stable group can be considered like a single author for these purposes.

704: 708: 700: 642:, as accessed November 27, 2012), although one blog poster argued that it is reasonable ( 475:

This is about consensus in a field or discipline. For consensus in Knowledge (XXG), see

126:"Cherry-picking" a source is selecting only the information favourable to an editor's 16:

This page is about source cherrypicking. For the guideline on rule cherrypicking, see

3609: 3118:

Assume that everyone's assuming good faith, assuming that you are assuming good faith

692: 54:. Some essays represent widespread norms; others only represent minority viewpoints. 688: 684: 18:

Knowledge (XXG):Gaming the system § Gaming the use of policies and guidelines

422: 2319:

Don't accuse someone of a personal attack for accusing of a personal attack

166:

Failure to do so often violates Knowledge (XXG)'s policies and guidelines:

719: 744: 412:

Knowledge (XXG)'s citations almost never show which printing is cited.

1723:

Don't overuse shortcuts to policy and guidelines to win your argument

Knowledge (XXG) is not here to tell the world about your noble cause

609:(for an article with largely one-sided views regardless of sourcing) 713: 1188:

Criticisms of society may be consistent with NPOV and reliability

210:

For the policy on not going beyond what sourcing expresses, see

3498: 3035: 2642: 1848: 789: 748: 452:

contradictory statements in one work, such as in an anthology.

102: 25: 2885:

Not every single thing Donald Trump does deserves an article

2057:

Most people who disagree with you on content are not vandals

1525:

Knowledge (XXG) is not being written in an organized fashion

683:

Websites supporting searches include, for hardcopy sources,

2414:

Don't demand that editors solve the problems they identify

2223:

Drop the stick and back slowly away from the horse carcass

1818:

What to do if your article gets tagged for speedy deletion

1158:

Children's lit, adult new readers, & large-print books

870:

Editing Knowledge (XXG) is like visiting a foreign country

3646:

Knowledge (XXG) essays introducing or defining new terms

3258:

How many Wikipedians does it take to change a lightbulb?

3268:

How to put up a straight pole by pushing it at an angle

304: 260: 90: 83: 76: 69: 2820:

No amount of editing can overcome a lack of notability

2454:

Don't make a smarmy valediction part of your signature

634:

Keynes: He Didn’t Say Half of What He Said. Or Did He?

2566:

There's no need to guess someone's preferred pronouns

1203:

Don't demolish the house while it's still being built

514:

hypothetical examples may illuminate the difference:

3010:

Knowledge (XXG) is not the place to post your résumé

640:(probably online only), February 11, 2011, 9:19 a.m. 3557: 3511: 2584: 2291: 2155: 1989: 1861: 1621: 1548: 1043: 802: 584:

Knowledge (XXG):Coatrack (the section Fact picking)

3529:Difference between policies, guidelines and essays 3308:Newcomers are delicious, so go ahead and bite them 930:Not editing because of Knowledge (XXG) restriction 1500:Understanding Knowledge (XXG)'s content standards 792:Essays on building, editing, and deleting content 1653:Arguments to avoid in image deletion discussions 1598:We shouldn't be able to figure out your opinions 1350:Not every story/event/disaster needs a biography 661:Famous For 15 Minutes: My Years With Andy Warhol 630:, that is doubted for want of a primary source ( 3328:No climbing the Reichstag dressed as Spider-Man 3058:Ain't no rules says a dog can't play basketball 2735:Drafts are not checked for notability or sanity 1375:Organizing disambiguation pages by subject area 880:Eight simple rules for editing our encyclopedia 3636:Knowledge (XXG) essays about original research 2755:Extracting the meaning of significant coverage 1921:High-functioning autism and Asperger's editors 1688:Counting and sorting are not original research 392:or just adding new content and new citations. 3641:Knowledge (XXG) essays about reliable sources 3582:How to contribute to Knowledge (XXG) guidance 3198:Don't abbreviate "Knowledge (XXG)" as "Wiki"! 1718:Don't confuse stub status with non-notability 1000:The role of policies in collaborative anarchy 760: 8: 3248:Seven Ages of Editor, by Will E. Spear-Shake 2012:An uncivil environment is a poor environment 1738:How to save an article proposed for deletion 1015:We are absolutely here to right great wrongs 990:Ten Simple Rules for Editing Knowledge (XXG) 955:POV and OR from editors, sources, and fields 703:(http://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/), the 437:With regard to one author's views, editions 2780:Inclusion is not an indicator of notability 543:Outside of Knowledge (XXG), in many media, 471:Consensus change outside of Knowledge (XXG) 3508: 3495: 3473:You don't have to be mad to work here, but 3045: 3032: 2860:Notability is not relevance or reliability 2815:News coverage does not decrease notability 2725:Discriminate vs indiscriminate information 2675:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 2652: 2639: 1858: 1845: 1668:Before commenting in a deletion discussion 1643:Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions 799: 786: 767: 753: 745: 3368:Please be a giant dick, so we can ban you 1658:Arguments to make in deletion discussions 1278:Identifying and using independent sources 3534:Don't cite essays as if they were policy 2695:Big events make key participants notable 2142:Knowledge (XXG) should not be a monopoly 1520:Knowledge (XXG) is not a reliable source 1258:Formatting bilateral relations templates 717:(for books and journals) and those from 121: 48:Knowledge (XXG)'s policies or guidelines 3626:Knowledge (XXG) essays about neutrality 2945:Solutions are mixtures and nothing else 2850:Notability is not a level playing field 2765:How the presumption of notability works 1881:Contributing to complicated discussions 1733:How the presumption of notability works 1253:Formatting bilateral relations articles 1068:Adding images improves the encyclopedia 619: 3478:You should not write meaningless lists 2775:Historical/Policy/Notability/Arguments 2082:Staying cool when the editing gets hot 1823:When in doubt, hide it in the woodwork 1648:Arguments to avoid in deletion reviews 1213:Don't hope the house will build itself 820:All Five Pillars are equally important 134:In the context of editing an article, 2905:One sentence does not an article make 2855:Notability is not a matter of opinion 2571:You can't squeeze blood from a turnip 2484:Don't throw your toys out of the pram 2002:A weak personal attack is still wrong 1941:Obsessive–compulsive disorder editors 1573:Don't throw more litter onto the pile 1515:Knowledge (XXG) is a work in progress 1340:Minors and persons judged incompetent 1103:An unfinished house is a real problem 1088:Alternatives to the "Expand" template 890:External criticism of Knowledge (XXG) 421:as authoritative and, almost always, 7: 3621:Knowledge (XXG) essays about editing 3458:What Knowledge (XXG) is not/Outtakes 3438:Things that should not be surprising 3133:Bad Jokes and Other Deleted Nonsense 2459:Don't remind others of past misdeeds 2404:Don't come down like a ton of bricks 2389:Don't call people by their real name 2137:Knowledge (XXG) is not about winning 2067:Profanity, civility, and discussions 1475:There are no shortcuts to neutrality 691:(http://books.google.com/) and, for 589:Knowledge (XXG):How to mine a source 456:Different authors of different works 283:should be reported or summarized as 3333:No one cares about your garage band 3318:List of jokes about Knowledge (XXG) 2985:What is and is not routine coverage 2830:No one cares about your garage band 2750:Existence does not prove notability 2168:Assume the assumption of good faith 2097:There is no Divine Right of Editors 1951:Relationships with academic editors 1813:Why was the page I created deleted? 1808:Knowledge (XXG) is not Whack-A-Mole 1248:Featured articles may have problems 1035:Knowledge (XXG) is not RationalWiki 3378:Please do not murder the newcomers 2935:Reducing consensus to an algorithm 2419:Don't drink the consensus Kool-Aid 1633:Adjectives in your recommendations 1510:What an article should not include 1400:The problem with elegant variation 1208:Don't get hung up on minor details 1025:Knowledge (XXG) is an encyclopedia 52:thoroughly vetted by the community 14: 3631:Knowledge (XXG) behavioral essays 3428:The first rule of Knowledge (XXG) 3000:Knowledge (XXG) is not Crunchbase 2700:Businesses with a single location 1981:You have a right to remain silent 1430:Restoring part of a reverted edit 1385:Potential, not just current state 1315:Ignore STRONGNAT for date formats 699:(http://www.gutenberg.org/), the 433:Same author across multiple works 2449:Don't knit beside the guillotine 2444:Don't ignore community consensus 1678:Confusing arguments mean nothing 357:be provided in Knowledge (XXG). 247:Multiple sources within a source 106: 29: 23:Essay on editing Knowledge (XXG) 2950:Sources must be out-of-universe 2665:All high schools can be notable 2062:Old-fashioned Wikipedian values 1748:Identifying blatant advertising 1530:The world will not end tomorrow 1360:Not everything needs a template 1273:How to write a featured article 875:Editors will sometimes be wrong 3539:Avoid writing redundant essays 3188:Don't stuff beans up your nose 3063:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 2890:Obscurity ≠ Lack of notability 2840:Notability cannot be purchased 2800:Masking the lack of notability 1563:Copyediting reception sections 1465:Temporary versions of articles 1395:Principle of Some Astonishment 1183:Creating controversial content 1083:Akin's Laws of Article Writing 1030:Knowledge (XXG) is a community 1: 3565:About policies and guidelines 2680:Articles with a single source 2304:Knowledge (XXG):Because I can 2127:Two wrongs don't make a right 2117:The rules of polite discourse 2047:It's not the end of the world 1355:Not everything needs a navbox 1223:Don't "teach the controversy" 895:Here to build an encyclopedia 687:(http://www.amazon.com/) and 626:Although often attributed to 352:Merely additional information 3453:Knowledge (XXG) is an MMORPG 3148:BOLD, revert, revert, revert 3068:Alternatives to edit warring 1931:Maintaining a friendly space 487:Paraphrasings and quotations 314:unless they are criticisms. 145:Outside of Knowledge (XXG), 3433:The Five Pillars of Untruth 3223:Editing under the influence 2760:Google searches and numbers 2479:Don't template the regulars 2394:Don't call the kettle black 2188:Be excellent to one another 2072:Revert notification opt-out 1976:We are all Wikipedians here 1425:Put a little effort into it 1370:Obtain peer review comments 1325:Introduction to structurism 1263:Fruit of the poisonous tree 1233:Editors are not mindreaders 1138:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle 1128:Beef up that first revision 900:Leave it to the experienced 865:Don't search for objections 3662: 3463:Why not create an account? 3398:Requirements for adminship 3273:How to vandalize correctly 3243:Five Fs of Knowledge (XXG) 3203:Don't delete the main page 3123:Avoid using preview button 2845:Notability comparison test 2429:Don't fight fire with fire 2424:Don't eat the troll's food 2384:Don't call a spade a spade 2379:Don't bludgeon the process 2228:Encourage full discussions 2077:Shadowless Fists of Death! 1713:Don't attack the nominator 1673:But there must be sources! 1495:Try not to leave it a stub 1445:Source your plot summaries 474: 294: 250: 209: 59: 15: 3507: 3494: 3413:Sarcasm is really helpful 3353:Notability is not eternal 3278:How to win a citation war 3048: 3044: 3031: 2740:Every snowflake is unique 2660:Advanced source searching 2655: 2651: 2638: 2541:No, you can't have a pony 2489:Do not insult the vandals 2349:Don't be high-maintenance 1906:Encouraging the newcomers 1857: 1844: 1450:Specialized-style fallacy 1415:Pruning article revisions 1243:Endorsements (commercial) 1228:Editing on mobile devices 1133:Blind men and an elephant 1108:Articles have a half-life 855:Dissent is not disloyalty 825:Avoid vague introductions 798: 785: 477:Knowledge (XXG):Consensus 404:Printings and impressions 3423:The Night Before Wikimas 3288:Ignore every single rule 3263:How to get away with UPE 3143:Before they were notable 2915:Overreliance upon Google 2710:Common sourcing mistakes 2283:Settle the process first 2243:Imagine others complexly 2147:Writing for the opponent 2122:There is no common sense 1803:Unopposed AFD discussion 1788:Relisting can be abusive 1663:Avoid repeated arguments 1268:Give an article a chance 1118:Avoid mission statements 1078:Advanced text formatting 1073:Advanced article editing 1020:Knowledge (XXG) in brief 1005:The rules are principles 965:Product, process, policy 815:Articles must be written 114:This page in a nutshell: 3558:Policies and guidelines 3393:Requests for medication 3373:Please bite the newbies 3298:Mess with the templates 2865:Notability means impact 2399:Don't call things cruft 2374:Don't be the Fun Police 2183:Avoid the word "vandal" 2132:Knowledge (XXG) clichés 1997:A thank you never hurts 1768:Liar liar pants on fire 1703:Deletion is not cleanup 1613:Writing better articles 1603:Write the article first 1578:Gender-neutral language 1550:Writing article content 1540:Writing better articles 1535:Write the article first 1470:Tertiary-source fallacy 1238:Encourage the newcomers 1198:Dictionaries as sources 1143:Build content to endure 701:Perseus Digital Library 638:The Wall Street Journal 539:outside Knowledge (XXG) 3616:Knowledge (XXG) essays 3587:Policy writing is hard 3293:Is that even an essay? 2990:What notability is not 2745:Existence ≠ Notability 2354:Don't be inconsiderate 2278:Read before commenting 2263:Mind your own business 2178:Avoid personal remarks 1753:Identifying test edits 1098:A navbox on every page 1053:100K featured articles 850:Concede lost arguments 845:Competence is required 776:Knowledge (XXG) essays 607:Template:Cherry picked 361:One source or multiple 131: 3383:Pledge of Tranquility 3128:Avoid using wikilinks 2955:Subjective importance 2469:Don't spite your face 2258:Keep it down to earth 2022:Beware of the tigers! 1961:Too long; didn't read 1901:Edit at your own pace 1871:Accepting other users 1638:AfD is not a war zone 985:There is no seniority 925:Neutrality of sources 291:Mixed fields of study 125: 50:, as it has not been 3549:Quote your own essay 3418:Sausages for tasting 3193:Don't-give-a-fuckism 3163:CaPiTaLiZaTiOn MuCh? 2975:Vanispamcruftisement 2875:Notability sub-pages 2685:Avoid template creep 2645:Essays on notability 2561:There are no oracles 2344:Don't be a WikiBigot 2198:Call a spade a spade 1971:Unblock perspectives 1798:The Heymann Standard 1783:Overzealous deletion 1743:I just don't like it 1480:There is no deadline 1345:"Murder of" articles 1173:Common-style fallacy 1045:Article construction 960:Process is important 905:Levels of competence 830:Be a reliable source 614:Notes and references 579:WP:Civil POV pushing 559:A positive sense of 552:Positive meaning of 3338:No one really cares 3253:Go ahead, vandalize 3015:Two prongs of merit 2960:Third-party sources 2880:Notabilitymandering 2835:No one really cares 2790:Inherent notability 2785:Independent sources 2670:Alternative outlets 2504:Nationalist editing 2474:Don't take the bait 2439:Don't help too much 2364:Don't be prejudiced 2334:Don't be an ostrich 2299:ALPHABETTISPAGHETTI 2032:Deletion as revenge 2007:Advice for hotheads 1828:No Encyclopedic Use 1708:Does deletion help? 1608:Writing about women 1490:The deadline is now 1485:There is a deadline 1365:Nothing is in stone 995:Tendentious editing 910:Levels of consensus 628:John Maynard Keynes 502:assuming good faith 155:Do not cherrypick. 3348:No sorcery threats 3228:Embrace Stop Signs 3108:Assume good wraith 3083:Anti-Wikipedianism 2920:Perennial websites 2910:Other stuff exists 2546:Passive aggression 2509:No angry mastodons 2499:Hate is disruptive 2359:Don't be obnoxious 2324:Don't be a fanatic 2102:Most ideas are bad 2042:Forgive and forget 1851:Essays on civility 1460:Run an edit-a-thon 1193:Deprecated sources 1168:Citation underkill 1153:Chesterton's fence 1123:Be neutral in form 975:Reasonability rule 940:Oversimplification 915:Most ideas are bad 535:Larger meaning of 509:Deletion or debate 343:Where to find them 132: 3603: 3602: 3599: 3598: 3595: 3594: 3490: 3489: 3486: 3485: 3468:Yes legal threats 3283:Ignore all essays 3168:Complete bollocks 3093:Asshole John rule 3027: 3026: 3023: 3022: 2980:What BLP1E is not 2900:One hundred words 2870:Notability points 2634: 2633: 2630: 2629: 2434:Don't give a fuck 2309:Civil POV pushing 2273:Mutual withdrawal 2163:Assume good faith 2027:Civility warnings 1946:Please say please 1896:Editors' pronouns 1840: 1839: 1836: 1835: 1728:Follow the leader 1593:Use our own words 1558:Avoid thread mode 1405:Pro and con lists 1163:Citation overkill 1113:Autosizing images 835:Civil POV pushing 697:Project Gutenberg 120: 119: 101: 100: 77:WP:CHERRY-PICKING 3653: 3544:Finding an essay 3509: 3496: 3158:Butterfly effect 3153:Boston Tea Party 3113:Assume stupidity 3098:Assume bad faith 3088:Articlecountitis 3046: 3033: 2965:Trivial mentions 2810:Minimum coverage 2653: 2640: 2339:Don't be ashamed 2218:Discussing cruft 2208:Deny recognition 2107:Nothing is clear 1916:Expect no thanks 1859: 1846: 1778:Nothing is clear 1625:deleting content 1308:Tertiary sources 1063:Acronym overkill 935:The one question 800: 787: 780: 769: 762: 755: 746: 739: 736: 730: 705:Internet Archive 681: 675: 657: 651: 624: 370:Multiple sources 307: 263: 212:WP:STICKTOSOURCE 159:Main information 110: 109: 103: 93: 86: 79: 72: 70:WP:CHERRYPICKING 33: 32: 26: 3661: 3660: 3656: 3655: 3654: 3652: 3651: 3650: 3606: 3605: 3604: 3591: 3553: 3524:Value of essays 3503: 3482: 3313:Legal vandalism 3178:Counting juntas 3078:Anti-Wikipedian 3040: 3038:Humorous essays 3019: 2995:What to include 2940:Run-of-the-mill 2930:Read the source 2895:Offline sources 2690:Bare notability 2647: 2626: 2580: 2531:No Confederates 2329:Don't be a jerk 2287: 2253:Keep it concise 2193:Beyond civility 2151: 1985: 1926:How to be civil 1891:Don't retaliate 1853: 1832: 1763:Keep it concise 1698:Delete the junk 1693:Delete or merge 1683:Content removal 1617: 1583:Myth vs fiction 1544: 1435:Robotic editing 1298:Science sources 1293:Primary sources 1283:History sources 1058:Abandoned stubs 1039: 810:Article content 794: 781: 773: 743: 742: 737: 733: 709:Wayback Machine 682: 678: 659:Violet, Ultra, 658: 654: 625: 621: 616: 570: 557: 541: 511: 497: 489: 480: 473: 458: 435: 418: 406: 385: 372: 363: 354: 345: 333: 311: 310: 303: 299: 293: 280: 267: 266: 259: 255: 249: 224: 215: 208: 161: 107: 97: 96: 89: 82: 75: 68: 64: 56: 55: 30: 24: 21: 12: 11: 5: 3659: 3657: 3649: 3648: 3643: 3638: 3633: 3628: 3623: 3618: 3608: 3607: 3601: 3600: 3597: 3596: 3593: 3592: 3590: 3589: 3584: 3579: 3578: 3577: 3572: 3561: 3559: 3555: 3554: 3552: 3551: 3546: 3541: 3536: 3531: 3526: 3521: 3515: 3513: 3505: 3504: 3499: 3492: 3491: 3488: 3487: 3484: 3483: 3481: 3480: 3475: 3470: 3465: 3460: 3455: 3450: 3445: 3440: 3435: 3430: 3425: 3420: 3415: 3410: 3405: 3400: 3395: 3390: 3385: 3380: 3375: 3370: 3365: 3360: 3355: 3350: 3345: 3340: 3335: 3330: 3325: 3320: 3315: 3310: 3305: 3300: 3295: 3290: 3285: 3280: 3275: 3270: 3265: 3260: 3255: 3250: 3245: 3240: 3235: 3230: 3225: 3220: 3218:Editsummarisis 3215: 3210: 3205: 3200: 3195: 3190: 3185: 3180: 3175: 3173:Counting forks 3170: 3165: 3160: 3155: 3150: 3145: 3140: 3135: 3130: 3125: 3120: 3115: 3110: 3105: 3100: 3095: 3090: 3085: 3080: 3075: 3070: 3065: 3060: 3055: 3049: 3042: 3041: 3036: 3029: 3028: 3025: 3024: 3021: 3020: 3018: 3017: 3012: 3007: 3002: 2997: 2992: 2987: 2982: 2977: 2972: 2967: 2962: 2957: 2952: 2947: 2942: 2937: 2932: 2927: 2922: 2917: 2912: 2907: 2902: 2897: 2892: 2887: 2882: 2877: 2872: 2867: 2862: 2857: 2852: 2847: 2842: 2837: 2832: 2827: 2822: 2817: 2812: 2807: 2802: 2797: 2792: 2787: 2782: 2777: 2772: 2767: 2762: 2757: 2752: 2747: 2742: 2737: 2732: 2730:Don't cite GNG 2727: 2722: 2717: 2712: 2707: 2705:But it's true! 2702: 2697: 2692: 2687: 2682: 2677: 2672: 2667: 2662: 2656: 2649: 2648: 2643: 2636: 2635: 2632: 2631: 2628: 2627: 2625: 2624: 2619: 2614: 2609: 2604: 2602:WikiHarassment 2599: 2594: 2588: 2586: 2582: 2581: 2579: 2578: 2573: 2568: 2563: 2558: 2553: 2548: 2543: 2538: 2536:No queerphobia 2533: 2528: 2523: 2518: 2517: 2516: 2506: 2501: 2496: 2491: 2486: 2481: 2476: 2471: 2466: 2461: 2456: 2451: 2446: 2441: 2436: 2431: 2426: 2421: 2416: 2411: 2406: 2401: 2396: 2391: 2386: 2381: 2376: 2371: 2366: 2361: 2356: 2351: 2346: 2341: 2336: 2331: 2326: 2321: 2316: 2311: 2306: 2301: 2295: 2293: 2289: 2288: 2286: 2285: 2280: 2275: 2270: 2265: 2260: 2255: 2250: 2245: 2240: 2235: 2230: 2225: 2220: 2215: 2210: 2205: 2200: 2195: 2190: 2185: 2180: 2175: 2173:Assume no clue 2170: 2165: 2159: 2157: 2153: 2152: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2139: 2134: 2129: 2124: 2119: 2114: 2109: 2104: 2099: 2094: 2089: 2084: 2079: 2074: 2069: 2064: 2059: 2054: 2049: 2044: 2039: 2034: 2029: 2024: 2019: 2014: 2009: 2004: 1999: 1993: 1991: 1987: 1986: 1984: 1983: 1978: 1973: 1968: 1963: 1958: 1953: 1948: 1943: 1938: 1933: 1928: 1923: 1918: 1913: 1911:Enjoy yourself 1908: 1903: 1898: 1893: 1888: 1883: 1878: 1873: 1867: 1865: 1855: 1854: 1849: 1842: 1841: 1838: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1831: 1830: 1825: 1820: 1815: 1810: 1805: 1800: 1795: 1790: 1785: 1780: 1775: 1770: 1765: 1760: 1755: 1750: 1745: 1740: 1735: 1730: 1725: 1720: 1715: 1710: 1705: 1700: 1695: 1690: 1685: 1680: 1675: 1670: 1665: 1660: 1655: 1650: 1645: 1640: 1635: 1629: 1627: 1624: 1619: 1618: 1616: 1615: 1610: 1605: 1600: 1595: 1590: 1585: 1580: 1575: 1570: 1565: 1560: 1554: 1552: 1546: 1545: 1543: 1542: 1537: 1532: 1527: 1522: 1517: 1512: 1507: 1502: 1497: 1492: 1487: 1482: 1477: 1472: 1467: 1462: 1457: 1452: 1447: 1442: 1440:Sham consensus 1437: 1432: 1427: 1422: 1417: 1412: 1407: 1402: 1397: 1392: 1387: 1382: 1377: 1372: 1367: 1362: 1357: 1352: 1347: 1342: 1337: 1332: 1327: 1322: 1317: 1312: 1311: 1310: 1305: 1300: 1295: 1290: 1285: 1275: 1270: 1265: 1260: 1255: 1250: 1245: 1240: 1235: 1230: 1225: 1220: 1215: 1210: 1205: 1200: 1195: 1190: 1185: 1180: 1175: 1170: 1165: 1160: 1155: 1150: 1145: 1140: 1135: 1130: 1125: 1120: 1115: 1110: 1105: 1100: 1095: 1090: 1085: 1080: 1075: 1070: 1065: 1060: 1055: 1049: 1047: 1041: 1040: 1038: 1037: 1032: 1027: 1022: 1017: 1012: 1007: 1002: 997: 992: 987: 982: 977: 972: 967: 962: 957: 952: 947: 942: 937: 932: 927: 922: 917: 912: 907: 902: 897: 892: 887: 885:Explanationism 882: 877: 872: 867: 862: 857: 852: 847: 842: 837: 832: 827: 822: 817: 812: 806: 804: 796: 795: 790: 783: 782: 774: 772: 771: 764: 757: 749: 741: 740: 731: 676: 652: 632:Zweig, Jason, 618: 617: 615: 612: 611: 610: 598: 597: 591: 586: 581: 569: 566: 556: 550: 540: 533: 529: 528: 524: 520: 510: 507: 496: 493: 488: 485: 472: 469: 457: 454: 434: 431: 417: 414: 405: 402: 384: 381: 371: 368: 362: 359: 353: 350: 344: 341: 332: 329: 328: 327: 323: 319: 309: 308: 300: 295: 292: 289: 279: 276: 265: 264: 256: 251: 248: 245: 223: 220: 207: 206:Contradictions 204: 199: 198: 192: 186: 180: 174: 160: 157: 118: 117: 111: 99: 98: 95: 94: 91:WP:CHERRY-PICK 87: 80: 73: 65: 60: 57: 45: 44: 36: 34: 22: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3658: 3647: 3644: 3642: 3639: 3637: 3634: 3632: 3629: 3627: 3624: 3622: 3619: 3617: 3614: 3613: 3611: 3588: 3585: 3583: 3580: 3576: 3573: 3571: 3568: 3567: 3566: 3563: 3562: 3560: 3556: 3550: 3547: 3545: 3542: 3540: 3537: 3535: 3532: 3530: 3527: 3525: 3522: 3520: 3517: 3516: 3514: 3510: 3506: 3502: 3497: 3493: 3479: 3476: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3464: 3461: 3459: 3456: 3454: 3451: 3449: 3448:Watchlistitis 3446: 3444: 3443:The WikiBible 3441: 3439: 3436: 3434: 3431: 3429: 3426: 3424: 3421: 3419: 3416: 3414: 3411: 3409: 3406: 3404: 3401: 3399: 3396: 3394: 3391: 3389: 3388:R-e-s-p-e-c-t 3386: 3384: 3381: 3379: 3376: 3374: 3371: 3369: 3366: 3364: 3363:Play the game 3361: 3359: 3356: 3354: 3351: 3349: 3346: 3344: 3341: 3339: 3336: 3334: 3331: 3329: 3326: 3324: 3321: 3319: 3316: 3314: 3311: 3309: 3306: 3304: 3303:My local pond 3301: 3299: 3296: 3294: 3291: 3289: 3286: 3284: 3281: 3279: 3276: 3274: 3271: 3269: 3266: 3264: 3261: 3259: 3256: 3254: 3251: 3249: 3246: 3244: 3241: 3239: 3236: 3234: 3231: 3229: 3226: 3224: 3221: 3219: 3216: 3214: 3213:Edits Per Day 3211: 3209: 3208:Editcountitis 3206: 3204: 3201: 3199: 3196: 3194: 3191: 3189: 3186: 3184: 3181: 3179: 3176: 3174: 3171: 3169: 3166: 3164: 3161: 3159: 3156: 3154: 3151: 3149: 3146: 3144: 3141: 3139: 3136: 3134: 3131: 3129: 3126: 3124: 3121: 3119: 3116: 3114: 3111: 3109: 3106: 3104: 3101: 3099: 3096: 3094: 3091: 3089: 3086: 3084: 3081: 3079: 3076: 3074: 3071: 3069: 3066: 3064: 3061: 3059: 3056: 3054: 3051: 3050: 3047: 3043: 3039: 3034: 3030: 3016: 3013: 3011: 3008: 3006: 3003: 3001: 2998: 2996: 2993: 2991: 2988: 2986: 2983: 2981: 2978: 2976: 2973: 2971: 2968: 2966: 2963: 2961: 2958: 2956: 2953: 2951: 2948: 2946: 2943: 2941: 2938: 2936: 2933: 2931: 2928: 2926: 2923: 2921: 2918: 2916: 2913: 2911: 2908: 2906: 2903: 2901: 2898: 2896: 2893: 2891: 2888: 2886: 2883: 2881: 2878: 2876: 2873: 2871: 2868: 2866: 2863: 2861: 2858: 2856: 2853: 2851: 2848: 2846: 2843: 2841: 2838: 2836: 2833: 2831: 2828: 2826: 2823: 2821: 2818: 2816: 2813: 2811: 2808: 2806: 2803: 2801: 2798: 2796: 2795:Insignificant 2793: 2791: 2788: 2786: 2783: 2781: 2778: 2776: 2773: 2771: 2768: 2766: 2763: 2761: 2758: 2756: 2753: 2751: 2748: 2746: 2743: 2741: 2738: 2736: 2733: 2731: 2728: 2726: 2723: 2721: 2718: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2708: 2706: 2703: 2701: 2698: 2696: 2693: 2691: 2688: 2686: 2683: 2681: 2678: 2676: 2673: 2671: 2668: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2654: 2650: 2646: 2641: 2637: 2623: 2620: 2618: 2615: 2613: 2612:WikiLawyering 2610: 2608: 2605: 2603: 2600: 2598: 2595: 2593: 2590: 2589: 2587: 2585:WikiRelations 2583: 2577: 2574: 2572: 2569: 2567: 2564: 2562: 2559: 2557: 2554: 2552: 2549: 2547: 2544: 2542: 2539: 2537: 2534: 2532: 2529: 2527: 2524: 2522: 2519: 2515: 2512: 2511: 2510: 2507: 2505: 2502: 2500: 2497: 2495: 2492: 2490: 2487: 2485: 2482: 2480: 2477: 2475: 2472: 2470: 2467: 2465: 2462: 2460: 2457: 2455: 2452: 2450: 2447: 2445: 2442: 2440: 2437: 2435: 2432: 2430: 2427: 2425: 2422: 2420: 2417: 2415: 2412: 2410: 2409:Don't cry COI 2407: 2405: 2402: 2400: 2397: 2395: 2392: 2390: 2387: 2385: 2382: 2380: 2377: 2375: 2372: 2370: 2369:Don't be rude 2367: 2365: 2362: 2360: 2357: 2355: 2352: 2350: 2347: 2345: 2342: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2332: 2330: 2327: 2325: 2322: 2320: 2317: 2315: 2314:Cyberbullying 2312: 2310: 2307: 2305: 2302: 2300: 2297: 2296: 2294: 2290: 2284: 2281: 2279: 2276: 2274: 2271: 2269: 2266: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2256: 2254: 2251: 2249: 2246: 2244: 2241: 2239: 2236: 2234: 2231: 2229: 2226: 2224: 2221: 2219: 2216: 2214: 2211: 2209: 2206: 2204: 2201: 2199: 2196: 2194: 2191: 2189: 2186: 2184: 2181: 2179: 2176: 2174: 2171: 2169: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2158: 2154: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2130: 2128: 2125: 2123: 2120: 2118: 2115: 2113: 2110: 2108: 2105: 2103: 2100: 2098: 2095: 2093: 2092:The last word 2090: 2088: 2087:The grey zone 2085: 2083: 2080: 2078: 2075: 2073: 2070: 2068: 2065: 2063: 2060: 2058: 2055: 2053: 2050: 2048: 2045: 2043: 2040: 2038: 2035: 2033: 2030: 2028: 2025: 2023: 2020: 2018: 2015: 2013: 2010: 2008: 2005: 2003: 2000: 1998: 1995: 1994: 1992: 1988: 1982: 1979: 1977: 1974: 1972: 1969: 1967: 1964: 1962: 1959: 1957: 1954: 1952: 1949: 1947: 1944: 1942: 1939: 1937: 1934: 1932: 1929: 1927: 1924: 1922: 1919: 1917: 1914: 1912: 1909: 1907: 1904: 1902: 1899: 1897: 1894: 1892: 1889: 1887: 1884: 1882: 1879: 1877: 1874: 1872: 1869: 1868: 1866: 1864: 1860: 1856: 1852: 1847: 1843: 1829: 1826: 1824: 1821: 1819: 1816: 1814: 1811: 1809: 1806: 1804: 1801: 1799: 1796: 1794: 1791: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1781: 1779: 1776: 1774: 1771: 1769: 1766: 1764: 1761: 1759: 1756: 1754: 1751: 1749: 1746: 1744: 1741: 1739: 1736: 1734: 1731: 1729: 1726: 1724: 1721: 1719: 1716: 1714: 1711: 1709: 1706: 1704: 1701: 1699: 1696: 1694: 1691: 1689: 1686: 1684: 1681: 1679: 1676: 1674: 1671: 1669: 1666: 1664: 1661: 1659: 1656: 1654: 1651: 1649: 1646: 1644: 1641: 1639: 1636: 1634: 1631: 1630: 1628: 1626: 1620: 1614: 1611: 1609: 1606: 1604: 1601: 1599: 1596: 1594: 1591: 1589: 1586: 1584: 1581: 1579: 1576: 1574: 1571: 1569: 1566: 1564: 1561: 1559: 1556: 1555: 1553: 1551: 1547: 1541: 1538: 1536: 1533: 1531: 1528: 1526: 1523: 1521: 1518: 1516: 1513: 1511: 1508: 1506: 1505:Walled garden 1503: 1501: 1498: 1496: 1493: 1491: 1488: 1486: 1483: 1481: 1478: 1476: 1473: 1471: 1468: 1466: 1463: 1461: 1458: 1456: 1453: 1451: 1448: 1446: 1443: 1441: 1438: 1436: 1433: 1431: 1428: 1426: 1423: 1421: 1418: 1416: 1413: 1411: 1408: 1406: 1403: 1401: 1398: 1396: 1393: 1391: 1388: 1386: 1383: 1381: 1378: 1376: 1373: 1371: 1368: 1366: 1363: 1361: 1358: 1356: 1353: 1351: 1348: 1346: 1343: 1341: 1338: 1336: 1333: 1331: 1330:Mine a source 1328: 1326: 1323: 1321: 1318: 1316: 1313: 1309: 1306: 1304: 1301: 1299: 1296: 1294: 1291: 1289: 1286: 1284: 1281: 1280: 1279: 1276: 1274: 1271: 1269: 1266: 1264: 1261: 1259: 1256: 1254: 1251: 1249: 1246: 1244: 1241: 1239: 1236: 1234: 1231: 1229: 1226: 1224: 1221: 1219: 1216: 1214: 1211: 1209: 1206: 1204: 1201: 1199: 1196: 1194: 1191: 1189: 1186: 1184: 1181: 1179: 1178:Concept cloud 1176: 1174: 1171: 1169: 1166: 1164: 1161: 1159: 1156: 1154: 1151: 1149: 1148:Cherrypicking 1146: 1144: 1141: 1139: 1136: 1134: 1131: 1129: 1126: 1124: 1121: 1119: 1116: 1114: 1111: 1109: 1106: 1104: 1101: 1099: 1096: 1094: 1091: 1089: 1086: 1084: 1081: 1079: 1076: 1074: 1071: 1069: 1066: 1064: 1061: 1059: 1056: 1054: 1051: 1050: 1048: 1046: 1042: 1036: 1033: 1031: 1028: 1026: 1023: 1021: 1018: 1016: 1013: 1011: 1008: 1006: 1003: 1001: 998: 996: 993: 991: 988: 986: 983: 981: 980:Systemic bias 978: 976: 973: 971: 968: 966: 963: 961: 958: 956: 953: 951: 948: 946: 943: 941: 938: 936: 933: 931: 928: 926: 923: 921: 918: 916: 913: 911: 908: 906: 903: 901: 898: 896: 893: 891: 888: 886: 883: 881: 878: 876: 873: 871: 868: 866: 863: 861: 858: 856: 853: 851: 848: 846: 843: 841: 838: 836: 833: 831: 828: 826: 823: 821: 818: 816: 813: 811: 808: 807: 805: 801: 797: 793: 788: 784: 777: 770: 765: 763: 758: 756: 751: 750: 747: 735: 732: 728: 727: 722: 721: 716: 715: 710: 706: 702: 698: 694: 693:public domain 690: 686: 680: 677: 673: 669: 668:0-380-70843-4 666: 662: 656: 653: 649: 645: 641: 639: 635: 629: 623: 620: 613: 608: 605: 604: 603: 602: 595: 592: 590: 587: 585: 582: 580: 577: 576: 575: 574: 567: 565: 562: 561:cherrypicking 555: 554:cherrypicking 551: 549: 546: 545:cherrypicking 538: 537:cherrypicking 534: 532: 525: 521: 517: 516: 515: 508: 506: 503: 494: 492: 486: 484: 478: 470: 468: 465: 461: 455: 453: 449: 446: 443: 440: 432: 430: 428: 424: 415: 413: 410: 403: 401: 397: 393: 389: 382: 380: 376: 369: 367: 360: 358: 351: 349: 342: 340: 337: 330: 324: 320: 317: 316: 315: 306: 302: 301: 298: 290: 288: 286: 277: 275: 271: 262: 258: 257: 254: 246: 244: 242: 236: 234: 228: 221: 219: 213: 205: 203: 196: 193: 190: 187: 184: 181: 178: 175: 172: 169: 168: 167: 164: 158: 156: 153: 150: 149: 148:cherrypicking 143: 139: 137: 136:cherrypicking 129: 128:point of view 124: 115: 112: 105: 104: 92: 88: 85: 84:WP:CHERRYPICK 81: 78: 74: 71: 67: 66: 63: 58: 53: 49: 43: 41: 35: 28: 27: 19: 3512:About essays 3501:About essays 3408:Rouge editor 3358:Oops Defense 3138:Barnstaritis 3103:Assume faith 2925:Pokémon test 2770:High Schools 2592:WikiBullying 2556:Superhatting 2551:POV railroad 2248:Just drop it 2052:Nobody cares 1886:Divisiveness 1410:Printability 1303:Style guides 1147: 1093:Amnesia test 950:Paraphrasing 734: 724: 718: 712: 689:Google Books 679: 671: 660: 655: 647: 643: 637: 633: 622: 600: 599: 572: 571: 560: 558: 553: 544: 542: 536: 530: 512: 498: 490: 481: 466: 462: 459: 450: 447: 444: 438: 436: 419: 411: 407: 398: 394: 390: 386: 377: 373: 364: 355: 346: 338: 334: 312: 281: 272: 268: 237: 229: 225: 216: 200: 165: 162: 154: 146: 144: 140: 135: 133: 113: 37: 3519:Essay guide 3403:Rouge admin 2970:Video links 2825:No big loss 2514:just madmen 2464:Don't shout 2238:How to lose 2233:Get over it 2017:Be the glue 1936:Negotiation 1793:Relist bias 1623:Removing or 1455:Stub Makers 1288:Law sources 1218:Don't panic 38:This is an 3610:Categories 3575:Guidelines 3343:No, really 3323:LTTAUTMAOK 2805:Make stubs 2526:No racists 2268:Say "MOBY" 1990:Philosophy 1863:The basics 1420:Publicists 1390:Presentism 1335:Merge Test 1320:Inaccuracy 803:Philosophy 685:Amazon.com 672:Disclaimer 670:)), p. v ( 423:microforms 416:Newspapers 331:Qualifiers 241:flashbacks 3053:Adminitis 2622:WikiPeace 2597:WikiCrime 2576:UPPERCASE 1956:Thank you 1588:Proseline 1380:Permastub 945:Paradoxes 860:Don't lie 726:EbscoHost 601:Templates 285:criticism 189:WP:FRINGE 62:Shortcuts 3570:Policies 2720:Coatrack 2617:WikiLove 2607:WikiHate 2521:No Nazis 2494:Griefing 1758:Immunity 1010:Trifecta 840:Cohesion 720:ProQuest 568:See also 495:Remedies 383:Editions 297:Shortcut 278:Critique 261:WP:MSWAS 253:Shortcut 183:WP:UNDUE 3233:Emerson 3073:ANI flu 2037:Failure 1876:Apology 1773:Nothing 970:Purpose 695:works, 305:WP:MFOS 171:WP:NPOV 2715:Clones 2292:Don'ts 2213:Desist 2203:Candor 2112:Reader 573:Essays 439:per se 233:weight 222:Timing 1966:Truce 714:JStor 636:, in 519:rare. 326:bias. 195:WP:RS 177:WP:OR 40:essay 3238:Fart 3183:Crap 1568:Coup 920:Need 723:and 665:ISBN 427:PDFs 2156:Dos 779:(?) 707:or 648:id. 644:id. 3612:: 674:). 425:, 287:. 768:e 761:t 754:v 729:. 479:. 214:. 42:. 20:.

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Cherrypicking - Knowledge (XXG)

Index