Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy/Masts

2537:

reception aerial. While I don't mind having this information tabulated, I can't imagine how you could put it on a page of manageable size, even just for the UK. There are about 100 major digital TV transmitters in the Uk, plus more analog ones and radio. This is useful information to people who like to mess about with TV receivers. This kind of information is very analogous to the parliamentary constituency data, which has many small articles with similar data about one place, which is very boring until you need it. One list for every country in the world arranged by height (technically the least interesting thing) is hopelessly un-usefull.

1783:, after it is merged, one should then turn the article into a redirect and delink it. These articles are excellent examples of organic growth. Interesting histories, pictures, ideosyncratic antenna arrangements, connections and external links that require good descriptions fit very well into the relatively free article format, and they tend to show clear signs of growth with age. Why is it thought necessary to change from the status quo? It all comes back to the question: what's the point? It seems like you have what you think is a solution, but what is the problem that it's supposed to solve? -- 1311:. In the first proposal people who will probably would never willingly research and write or add to an article on a mast are being asked to opine on whether the greater part of the class of masts should be turned into merged-redirects and new mast articles made extinct. In the second proposal I'm trying to be nicer, recognising that the effects foreseen by proposal 1 are exceedingly unlikely ever to happen, and giving some advice to those considering listing a mast article for deletion. 1935:. Not so much because I have any preference for the present layout, but because the drawbacks of the proposed table seem to me to be comparable to the present system; and it will be an enormous task to transfer the information (and since it's in all different formats, it's not something that can be automated), and there must be more pressing tasks on Knowledge (XXG). The table as represented in the demo won't even accommodate most of the minor masts, as Tony pointed out. 1803:

about reception. This is a vastly encyclopedic topic--a mast that stands prominently in a location (even though this one is out in the middle of nowhere--I've walked on Blanchland Moor and seen this one from miles away), broadcasts signals into millions of homes, and is licensed by a regulating authority tends to gather a history. I don't think it would be possible to reduce this all to a table.

647:, where several people asked for categories to be removed entirely. I do not personally agree that Categories are Bad (in fact, I love them and would want to obviate many lists for that very reason) but in present software implementation, there is significant opposition. Also note that, for performance reasons, categories are not supposed to have a couple hundred articles in them. 1470:

masts themselves. We could have a policy on masts but in practice it would be pretty useless because as soon as someone comes along with anything remotely interesting to say about a mast (and this has already happened in most of the cases I've looked at) they'd just have to split the article out again. A completely pointless policy that only creates more work. --

2556:

course for individual small masts used for mobile phone services, there is no article required. But radio masts taller than 100 metres or used for strong long-, medium- and shortwave transmitters should be kept, if their existence is real. In my opinion articles of real existing architectural structures have a greater relevance as those about fictional objects.

599:

Once more, note that the cat system is somewhat controversial. It doesn't always work on mirror sites, for one. Also, a list of related things is far more useful for referencing purposes than individual stub pages. It is not about the 'honor' of having an own article - it's about the accessibility of

466:

Support - any notable mast, i.e. one for which more than a stub could be written, can always have its own article if necessary - location, height and date built are not enough for an article (or do we want millions of articles which say "My house is 11 metres tall, was built in 1997 and is located at

1049:, built to transmit radio programs across the US prior to the invention of satellites. There are probably several thousand of them, built about 25-30 miles apart. They are almost always the tallest structure in town, and I would consider them no more worthy of encyclopedia articles than individual 2555:

should be deleted from the English speaking Knowledge (XXG), if the structure is real existing. Is there a problem with too much articles in Knowledge (XXG)? I think disk space gets cheaper and cheaper from year to year and there is no reason any more, to keep the number of articles restricted. Of

2518:

My concern if those articles are left is they set a standard of how little it takes to make an encylopedic article. I have a few articles being developed. Some are in tables and others are in other articles. That works if some cases, but not all. Not every mast is likely to get a good article

1484:

I have to politely disagree with Tony Sidaway on this. I've looked at twenty or thirty of the mast articles at random from the list, and I would say that a substantial majority could be merged into the proposed table without loss of information. The very tallest masts near the top of the list are

1306:

I'm not really that bothered about people listing for deletion overzealously, because in the long run this does little damage to Knowledge (XXG) and I think we all go through that learning curve. And what to me seems overzealous may to others seem just fine. It all gets sorted out in discussion.

1232:

The intent of this proposal is to track the observed organic growth of mast articles. Masts may well be anonymous, unvisited things in some locations, whereas in other locations (such as my own country where you're seldom more than thirty minutes walk away from a habitation) they are very familiar

1035:

This article I think is fine. It's a unique and recognizable part of the skyline, there's contextual information etc. But I would be careful about listing its height as a justification for the article's existence... there could be (and probably are) 1,000 tall towers located in prairie towns pop.

539:

This proposal fails to appreciate the flexibility of the category system. The lists of masts article will be dead to everyone but mast enthusiasts. Individual mast articles can be allocated to the appropriate locality, where they will be seen by the people most likely to be interested in them, that

1802:

Just out of interest, noticing that a mast I've heard of wasn't there, I thought I'd document it. I'm totally uninterested in them so I had to start from scratch. In almost no time I had found an existing picture of it on Knowledge (XXG), had historical information on it, and OFCOM and BBC data

1375:

Maybe it would be good if somebody constructed a sample table containing all the merged information for a half-dozen or so masts, so we could see what it would look like. There's a tradeoff between consolidation and usability that would be easier to balance if we had something concrete to inspect.

1260:

No, the proposal is to advise people considering listing a mast for deletion to check its age, and consider leaving it to grow if it's new. People who don't think mast articles should exist in the first place can still list and may even successfully have some mast articles deleted. whatever their

852:

columns to it, plus greatly increase the width of the "Location" (née "Country") column. While I like having all the information in one place, it's much harder to access if you have to scroll horizontally, or will be hard to read if the text wraps much more (which will happen if the table width is

2470:

I think this is where I differ. I can't see the point of trying to cram all those external links into a table when they're perfectly fine in a list at the end of the article. Moreover the minute someone uploads a picture or wants to write a bit more about the history you need to escape out into

1865:

But clearly there are such people engaged in doing just that. The articles listed as candidates for merge have one thing in common--they're all pretty new articles. The older articles tend be more interesting because people come along and add stuff. I happened to write a better stub than most

1735:

I would still suggest that many of the articles Tony Sidaway cites could be comfortably merged. Sites with multiple masts can have multiple rows in the table; the first column can be merged vertically to link them all together. Information about transmitter power and wavebands can go under the

1469:

I don't really see the point of this policy. These mast articles are a pretty heterogeneous bunch (astonishingly so--you'd think a mast was a mast wherever it was). Some masts have interesting stories, others come with links to satellite photographs, others have rather pretty photographs of the

1007:

Could a mast-fan please give an example of an article on a notable mast? Except for the possibility of a very, very few historically interesting masts 99.99% of these seem like simple recitation of uninteresting directory-style information. Individual articles are a fundamentally stupid way to

818:

I would vote "keep" for a mast article if aliens were involved in a spectacular collision with a revolving restaurant. Maybe even the second place it happened. But few other masts come close to notability. The other thousands should just be listed with no redirect since so few have meaningful

694:

whatever people are interested in posting here. Facilitate the mast enthusiasts, not alienate. Articles can be categorized, linked from locations, radio stations, or other places. I don't think such links to a monolithic list would be nearly as useful to the readers. Sure, masts are boring

2536:

I just looked up a transmitter on wiki, since I needed some information, and found the article in question had the relevant transmitter frequency information. From my point of view, the purpose of a transmitter is to send out a signal, and I want to know its frequency, strength, and appropriate

878:, and so forth). It's easy enough to put a navigation template on all of them, and it would (hopefully) make both editing and reading the list easier. If the proposal here gets a thumbs-up, then I might just create a masts Wikiproject to formulate consensus on the gory details of refactoring 1523:

without either loss of existing information or a high probability that someone will just have to revert to the existing version to add some information that won't fit there, then do so. You don't need a global consensus to do it. The answer to the problem of people listing mast articles for

1490:

The other reason for this policy proposal is that it is a (hopefully) nondestructive compromise. A number editors have independently nominated several of the stubbier mast articles for deletion in recent weeks. This merger would preserve the information, avoid clogging VfD with further mast

1200:, if not all, mast articles become more informative with time. The ones that tend to get listed for deletion are the newer onces. I'm only concerned that premature deletion of articles may tend to hamper this natural growth (though I doubt it could have much effect in the long run). -- 749:

for now. Tony Sidaway has presented good evidence that these articles grow over time. Any merging is likely to curb this growth. Let's leave the articles as they are for now and if they are still almost all stubs in a year then we will know it is probably a good idea to merge them. -

954:

For what it's worth, I agree with you. Maybe drop a note on the talk page of the article, and then be bold and merge away. I'm just going with this policy discussion here because merging a family of hundreds of articles is a mammoth job, and we want to get it right the first time.

400:

Partial support. I think many of the mast articles could redirect to articles on the radio or television stations that they are used by instead of the list. Often pretty easy to figure out when the call sign is in the name (except that many stations have changed names by now).

1906:

as 800 of them listed. Estimated size of the current list using the proposed format is 300*800=240,000 bytes. That is more than 7 times the maximun recommended size of 32KB. And the list is supposedly still growing. How many mast are there in the world? Second, is this even

2471:

article form anyway. I do think that we should continue to produce this long tabulated list, but I don't see why we should replace existing article content by redirects simply because some or all of the article has been tabulated. Each article already contains a link to

540:

is locals. Knowledge (XXG) should be organised in a way that maximises the amount of interesting information people will come across unexpectedly. It is not just a academic resource for people who have to write an essay and know what they need to look up to get it done.

1339:

If I'd been the one to create that article, it would have started with a single line. It could have been VfD'd and deleted before I got back to adding to it. Had that happened to my first article, I don't think I would have come back to WP any time soon. For example,

1408:

But with a smaller text font, they would be okay. Most masts need only this as the total of their encyclopedic content, and the significant ones can be linked from the table, and the few people who care can find them from the list or from searching on the tower name.

31:

The discussion has ran for over two weeks, and there is a 22-to-6 majority in favor of merging mast stubs. Since few if any things on a Wiki are ever unanimous, I'd say 78% is a very good consensus. Thus I'm closing it now. This is a summary of Proposal One, below.

1318:? It isn't gonna happen. There are dozens of masts like this in my country. They won't conveniently fit into some table and they're not deletable under the current deletion policy. I strongly suspect that the same applies to the masts in most other countries. -- 1766:, but the articles are barely six weeks old! Some of the articles I listed, as it happens, are nearly five months old and all show clear signs of organic growth. One of those in my list that I agree could be tabulated, it turns out, has only been around since 864:

I share your concerns about the size of the table. On the other hand, if we're reasonably sensible about the order of the columns, then I suspect that most readers won't want to scroll anyway. To be honest, I'm actually not sure what purposes people actually

669:. Cats are much more versatile than lists for this kind of application. If someone wants to dupe vital statistics in a list, fine, but use of individual articles seems the best way of presenting this information. Looking at random at some of the towers on 448:

The proposal is well-intentioned, however it is only practical it if the List of Masts article is broken up by country (and in some large countries, by state/province). If not it will end up being so massive as to be impossible to negotiate in any useful

388:

This is generally fine. I'm sure that there are exceptions, e.g. an interesting article could be written about an unusual transmitter/tower site like Columbia/Pea Island off New Rochelle, NY, but most of these things are just sticks in the ground.

869:

this list for, so I'm not sure how best to optimize it. Another option which bears serious consideration is breaking up the list somehow. Since it's already sorted by height, I might suggest breaking the list down into a series of lists

2007:

alongside the date of first edit and the number of edits to date. I'll probably keep expanding this list. I think it shows clear organic growth in the articles. Information is added as time goes on. The now rather impressive

699:

method of browsing, but individual articles are better points for adding data to. (Finally, if someone wants to list my small recorded edit count under this user name, please have the courtesy of signing your post when you do

1182:

masts. I believe a reasonable compromise would be to merge short mast articles into lists, and if and when substantial information is added on a mast, it can be 'broken out' and get its own article in addition to the list.

853:

tied to window width). If additional information must be "substantial" to warrant a separate article, then relatively minor additional information will have to be incorporated into this table also, further cluttering it. —

1866:

because I was concentrating on a single mast, I got lucky with the photo, and of course I may have a good eye for significant history. Leave the other articles around and the same will happen, sooner or later, to them. --

510:

Support. What's the point of scattering information in isolated fragments when you can present many related pieces together so they can be viewed in a single glance? Truly notable masts can always have their own articles.

1938:

I realize that you made this proposal as a compromise between the deletionists and the inclusionists, and if it falls through we'll still have to make a "deletion policy" for masts (as the title of this page suggests).

1954:

I don't find that a very compelling reason to oppose. Sure, there are lots of other things to be done, but if people want to work on this, let them. I'd be happy to chip in a couple of masts. Teamwork is light work :)

478:

Support. Radio masts are not inherently encyclopedic (or interesting) on their own, but most should probably receive mention somewhere, and I cannot see any reason why not to support mentioning them in an article like

67:, used to television or radio broadcasting.) Most of these articles have little or no content beyond the geographical location of the mast, its date of construction, its height, and—for a U.S. entry— a link to its 2424:

Warsaw Radio Mast is impressive and a good article, but I can't say the same about the WOI tower for instance. How about we merge all stubs on masts, and break them out again if and when more information is added?

690:. Obviously someone cares enough to post a LOT of these in the Knowledge (XXG). Since Knowledge (XXG) is not paper, it has the potential to fully contain hundreds of sets of articles in categories that serve as 673:

I do not see any that could easily be trimmed down to just the contents of the table on that list. It seems that like other articles they tend to grow organically, which is what Knowledge (XXG) is good for.

1429:

Thanks for the first iteration, Wahoofive. I poked at the narrow version of the table a bit, and I think it's salvageable. As Barno mentioned, perhaps judicious use of small fonts might be used as well.

714:

so much as whether the information should be in one big article or a bunch of little articles. Stub articles are only good if they have significant potential for expansion, and I'd say 95% of these don't.

419:

2444:

into a table without loss of information? Among the information in that article, you've got its proximity to another mast, a good satellite photo, and links to registration information and whatnot. --

1658:

pick and choose my starting point to slant the results, aside from selecting an American mast). All of the following could be merged; in fact many lack all of the basic information for the table.

1297:

Every article that I started here was started with a one line post that I came back to later. I don't want to stamp THIS IS MINE! on a new article, so I start very small. Have some patience. --

1246:

So is it your proposal that all mast pages should be kept? (i.e. when they come up on VfD in the future, we would refer to this policy, if enacted, as an argument for inclusion?) All masts? —

1137:

I agree with 1 and 2, but since they are pretty obvious, I assume your proposal is actually about point 3 and 4. I would like to see evidence of point 3, because I am far from convinced that

523:

Support. It's not likely that everyone of these is encyclopedic. Those that are can keep their own page. Value is obtained by including good articles, not by trying to have more articles.

434:

This would be a far superior presentation of this information; easier to make comparisons between masts, and to identify those masts about which there is something interesting to write.

2457:

In WOI, I see height, location, purpose, coordinates, year of building and another tower that is close by, and a bunch of external links. I'd say that fits pretty well in the table.

124: 764:

that adds to information on a specific mast, even a picture of graffiti at the base of it, is enough of a reason to give it's own article, linked to from the list, of course.

1348:, and not for nonsense or a copyvio! This is NOT a way to encourage new Wikipedians! Some VfD nominators have been acting like disk storage personally costs them money. -- 931:

is far, far more than a "list." The table, along with a few sentences of explanation, should stay, but the large amount of explanatory material up top should be merged into

2219: 1770:. So we've got a pretty strong picture of articles that start small and relatively uninteresting, and acquire information like snowballs--classic encyclopedia articles. 164: 43:

Mast articles should be merged and redirected with this list, unless they contain substantial additional information that does not fit in the list (for instance,

1485:

much more likely to have signficant associated content. I certainly wouldn't want to merge and redirect articles that have a story to tell or a good photograph.

140: 1233:

names and well known landmarks. I think the best way to find out which is which in an individual case is to give the article at least six months to grow. --

381:

Support, noting that I have no problem with a separate article about any individual mast that is actually notable for some reason other than being a mast.

590:

Thanks to WP advanced search abilities, there is no need to worry about having hundreds of small articles aslong as they are associated with categories.

501:

Fully support. Any truly exceptional masts that really need to say more can have their own article, if need be, though I doubt this will need to be. -

2488:

Well, I guess it boils down to Eventualism vs. Immediatism, or the price of a stub. Let's agree to disagree for now, we'll see what consensus says.

492:

Support. Many of these are owned by and named after the station that uses them. Those should be described in the station's article, not separately.

1101:

Mast articles tend to show organic growth over a period of months, so listing of mast articles younger than six months for deletion is discouraged.

1762:

Let's look at the articles that you're apparently suggesting could be merged in and redirected. The information on these towers is pretty sketchy

617:

If doing something to facilitate a mirror site reduces the value of the main site in any way, that's not something I would ever support doing. --

1368: 1654:

Interesting--the non-U.S. mast articles seem to be more comprehensive. I just looked at 10 consecutive entries from the middle of the table (I

834:

I'm with Calton on this one--if you can come up with interesting, unique things to say about a particular mast, it's likely to sway my opinion.

1843: 1746: 1505: 1440: 965: 892: 281: 1307:

I'm more concerned about this attempt to make new policy, really. Proposal 1, and even proposal 2 to a lesser extent, show symptoms of

1833:, this discussion would be entirely superfluous. (Though some of the information probably should still exist in list article, too.) -- 551:

area? As far as I'm aware, every last one of them is in the county, rather than the city, and most of them are closer to suburbs like

1968:

As a side point, you are correct that this page is somewhat misnamed. I'll add a notice to the Policy Consensus page reflecting that.

1807: 1587:: ownership, link to Radio Luxembourg (historically very important European radio station). Dual antenna details, ext links for both. 1562: 1315: 644: 1829:

mast article, methinks. A picture, historic significance, detailed info. If you're prepared to do the same for the other masts in

1693: 68: 1703: 1274:

It's not a big deal. Proposal 1 seems to me pretty much the same as proposal 2 in final effect, but without the helpful advice. --

2257: 177:

All these proposed deletions have resulted in 'keep'. It would seem the consensus is to retain articles about transmitter masts.

1533:

On the assumption that smaller masts may be less interesting, I examined the last ten masts on the list. I found the following:

160: 1678: 1673: 794:. Like, it was the first tower ever built, or was involved in a spectacular midair collision, or is used to contact aliens. · 588:

I'd prefer to have it go the other way. Explode the list of masts article into indivdual articles held together by a catagory.

1915:

kind of information, in my opinion. Do we aim on gathering technical data on every set of objects in the world? Do we want a

1543:: reason for construction, type of antenna used, gain of antenna. Article was improved, it is no stuff for deletion any more. 1008:

present this information because it would be extremely rare to want to look them up one-by-one instead of by region or type.

783:

In my opinion, "substantial" additional information would be things like "the mast has a revolving restaraunt halfway up". --

148: 1718: 1068:

is a nice article, and encyclopedic. I would vote to delete most other mast articles as non-notable and not encyclopedic.

976: 136: 1683: 1540: 875: 871: 1620:

are suitable for tabulation. The minute we get a photo of one of those we'll want the article back. What's the point? --

347:

Support, there is no need for these to be individual articles, unless there is something really unique about the tower--

17: 1590: 760:

Lists are harder to maintain than categories. Stub articles that will never expand should only exist in a list, but

1596: 1698: 1688: 1565:: location detail, station transmission history, antenna history. Article improved, no case for deletion any more. 1899: 1391: 1894: 1394:

and see how the tables look. I think they look like crap and will be much less useful than the present system. —

571:

all masts to the relevant list, and have a link with the mast's name in the relevant geography or city article.

1839: 1742: 1593:: historical details (WWII, terrorism). Ext link to site with excellent photographs and more detailed history. 1546: 1501: 1436: 961: 905: 888: 341: 277: 156: 72: 1708: 115: 1568: 901: 90:

at 35°37'00.0" N 78°28'22.0" W. Outlet Broadcasting Tower was built in 1987 and is used for TV broadcasting.

1713: 909: 1046: 128: 2510: 2480: 2449: 2415: 1871: 1815: 1788: 1641: 1625: 1475: 1323: 1295:

It seems that some people get more thrill out of nominating something VfD than they do adding information.

1279: 1266: 1238: 1205: 1166: 1118: 990:

Regarding the possible width of the table - small fonts are your friend. For some of the columns, anyway.

738: 679: 635: 255:

New mast articles need no longer be created. The information can be added directly to the table of masts.

1584: 1556: 1578: 630:? They seem to be in very widespread use for something that is supposed to be have some opposition. -- 168: 144: 2181: 354:

Support, and wish to note the diligence of TenofallTrades in contacting every voter on the vfd page.

1644: 1478: 2314: 1989: 1944: 1834: 1737: 1496: 1431: 1399: 1381: 1251: 1026: 956: 948: 917: 883: 858: 765: 720: 541: 425: 337: 272: 2492: 2461: 2429: 1972: 1959: 1341: 1187: 1145: 994: 936: 651: 604: 575: 552: 515: 394: 372: 1736:"Use" column; common names can sit under the transmitter's official name in the first column. -- 1581:: political details, wavebands broadcast, directionality, spares, multidirectional capabilities. 567:

that isn't necessarily true (but note that the cat system is somewhat controversial). One could

1178:

mast articles can get very lengthy and informative, I remain unconvinced that that is true for

248:

Once the existing mast articles have been merged in this way, they can be safely redirected to

2506: 2476: 2445: 2411: 2029: 2009: 1984:

Maybe instead it would be wise to develop a template for a standard look for the mast pages. —

1867: 1811: 1784: 1637: 1621: 1606: 1471: 1319: 1275: 1262: 1234: 1201: 1162: 1114: 734: 675: 631: 460: 217:

The use(s) of the mast (TV, radio, cellular, etc.) can be added to the table (create a column

132: 44: 2520: 1308: 838: 812: 556: 524: 472: 358: 330: 123:

Several mast articles have been proposed for deletion recently (See the group nomination at

2086: 450: 408: 348: 40:

should have added columns for Location, Coordinates, Purpose, Owner and FCC registration.

2551:

As English is the "World Language" no article of remarkable architectural structures of

1367:

Please feel free to add alternative proposals to this page. Confine longer comments to

547:

So where would you place the information on the dozen or so radio towers that cover the

2541: 2538: 2523: 2513: 2483: 2452: 2418: 2162: 1993: 1985: 1948: 1940: 1874: 1848: 1818: 1791: 1751: 1628: 1510: 1454: 1445: 1422: 1413: 1403: 1395: 1385: 1377: 1352: 1349: 1326: 1301: 1298: 1282: 1269: 1255: 1247: 1241: 1208: 1169: 1121: 1072: 1057: 1050: 1030: 1022: 1012: 944: 913: 854: 823: 768: 741: 716: 704: 701: 696: 682: 638: 621: 618: 527: 518: 505: 496: 487: 484: 421: 319: 262:

additional information exists may persist as independent articles linked from the List.

181: 178: 87: 50:

If the list gets overly large, it should be broken up by country (or possibly, region).

2505:

Immediatism? No such thing. Few articles start off complete, or even very useful. --

2489: 2472: 2458: 2426: 2124: 2004: 1969: 1956: 1888: 1860: 1830: 1520: 1492: 1419: 1184: 1142: 1095: 1088: 1054: 1037: 991: 980: 928: 879: 845: 795: 784: 670: 648: 601: 593: 572: 560: 512: 502: 493: 480: 440: 390: 382: 369: 308: 299: 249: 196: 152: 101: 60: 37: 2067: 2048: 1908: 1161:. I've already shown quite a bit of evidence to support this. I'll compile more. -- 456: 2276: 2110: 2034: 1065: 1018: 835: 808: 751: 548: 468: 355: 326: 292: 289: 848:

will get unwieldy. It's already full-screen width, and you're proposing to add

2395: 2390: 2376: 2371: 2357: 2352: 2333: 2300: 2295: 2243: 2238: 2205: 2143: 2105: 2053: 1920: 1451: 1450:

I'm surprised that the change of fonts made such small difference. Oh well.

1410: 1069: 1009: 940: 820: 405: 402: 365: 64: 195:

City and state information should be added (where available) to the table in

2441: 2200: 2072: 1141:

mast articles actually grow (or, indeed, can ever become more than a stub).

315: 2495: 2464: 2432: 1975: 1962: 1190: 1148: 1104:

The development of a infobox format for use in mast articles is encouraged.

997: 654: 607: 578: 375: 171:), and it may be appropriate to create a blanket policy to cover them all. 116:

http://wireless2.fcc.gov/UlsApp/AsrSearch/asrRegistration.jsp?regKey=611901

1609:: unique design. Ext link to excellent photos and historical information. 2475:

so nothing is lost by keeping the article content in its current form. --

2338: 2319: 2281: 2186: 2167: 2148: 2129: 2091: 1767: 1293:

interesting is that people are far too quick to nominate something VfD.

435: 1559:: type of antenna, transmitter power, common name ("Sender Neumünster"). 1524:

deletion is for those people to stop listing mast articles for deletion.

333:

01:03, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC). Almanac-like information in almanac-like form.

2262: 2224: 1912: 1902:

use a little more than an average 300 characters per mast. The current

83: 1418:

I've created a version of the wide table that uses a smaller font. --

63:

table have an associated article. (The masts in question are mostly

1261:

age--that would still be decided by consensus. No problem there. --

1021:, a San Francisco landmark and the highest structure in the city. — 730: 210:

Geographic coordinates can be added to the table (create a column

975:

I agree re: merging the information. Sounds like a job for the

239:

FCC registration info can be added to the table (create a column

2399: 2380: 2361: 2342: 2323: 2304: 2285: 2266: 2247: 2228: 2209: 2190: 2171: 2152: 2133: 2114: 2095: 2076: 2057: 2038: 1599:: location detail, waveband detail (covers FM, AM and UHF TV). 932: 82:

is a 466.5 metre high guyed mast of Outlet Broadcasting Inc. at

1289:

The problem with new factual articles about things that aren't

1893:

64 kilobytes long. This may be longer than is preferable; see

1550: 1491:

nominations, and (again, hopefully) add value to the table at

1616:

So out of the smallest ten masts, I could find only two that

1519:

If you can find any articles that could be moved entirely to

1017:

I don't know that I'd call myself a mast fan, but how about

1919:(with title, author, publication date, ISBN and subject)?-- 626:

And how accurate is Radiant's repeated claim that cats are

228:

The tower owner can be added to the table (create a column

1859:

If you're prepared to do the same for the other masts in

1344:, a patently obvious choice to write an article for, was 1094:

Editors are encouraged to add mast data from articles to

1091:

should continue to contain the brief data as at present.

710:

Weak support (see concerns below). It's not a matter of

415:

Weak support (see concerns below). It's not a matter of

125:

Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/South Dakota TV Tower

615:(Are sites like "answers.com" what you're refering to?) 1549:: type of antenna, construction detail, most powerful 900:

I can also see the opportunity to have separate lists

2012:

took over six months to get beyond three paragraphs.

1887:

So far no vote, just two comment. First, the current

1779:

be shoehorned in somehow. I just keep asking myself

1036:

500 that are "the highest structure in the city." ·

1174:Thank you. However, while your evidence shows that 592:IMHO, masts are a notable feature and public work. 165:

Knowledge (XXG):Votes for deletion/KISS Radio Tower

71:registration information. For example, the entire 2220:Des Moines Hearst-Argyle Television Tower Alleman 1931:With great reluctance, I have changed my vote to 613:Should we even care what works on mirror sites? 1999:On the organic growth of mast articles over time 1863:, this discussion would be entirely superfluous. 1694:South Dakota Public Broadcasting Network Tower 1571:: antenna details, ext link to owner details. 1898:. How large will it become? An estimate: The 1704:Spectra Site Communications Tower Orange City 819:names, let alone encyclopedic significance. 141:Clear Channel Broadcasting Tower Caesars Head 8: 1314:Can you imagine someone successfully VfDing 1601:Possibly suitable for tabulation at present 1573:Possibly suitable for tabulation at present 467:No. 7 Somewhere Street, Nowheresville"?). 161:South Carolina Educational TV tower Sumter 1679:Pacific and Southern Company Tower Lugoff 1674:Clear Channel Broadcasting Tower Rosinton 364:Very good idea. Comprehensiveness is a 149:Barnacle Broadcasting Tower Port Royale 1719:Northland Television Tower Rhinelander 1196:My investigations so far suggest that 1825:And that's an excellent example of a 1390:Okay, so the somebody is me. Look at 645:Knowledge (XXG):Categorization policy 137:Southeastern Media Tower Beech Island 7: 1684:Young Broadcasting Tower Garden City 876:List of masts taller than 500 meters 872:List of masts taller than 600 meters 1775:Oh I don't deny that a few of them 1045:For that matter, there are the old 807:revolving restaurant halfway up. -- 1808:Pontop Pike Television Transmitter 1563:Mediumwave transmitter Mainflingen 1316:Pontop Pike Television Transmitter 24: 163:; and see also the nomination at 59:Nearly all of the entries in the 2258:Diversified Communications Tower 2003:Here's a table of articles from 790:Yes, it really would have to be 2440:How would you go about merging 1591:Transmitter Villebon sur Yvette 18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion policy 1: 1597:Transmission Tower Lindenfels 1541:Mediumwave transmitter Bremen 1346:VfD'd in less than 15 minutes 559:, than to the city itself. -- 75:article is reproduced below. 2542:13:23, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 1699:Gray Television Tower Madill 1689:Gray Television Tower Carlos 182:13:25, 18 January 2006 (UTC) 1900:List of masts/Sample tables 1392:List of masts/Sample tables 951:) 16:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 861:) 16:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 252:and unlinked from the List. 2570: 1464: 920:) 19:36, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 800:22:14, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC) 723:) 16:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 610:11:06, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 428:) 16:00, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 411:13:20, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 322:) 23:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 1965:12:00, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 1227:comments on this proposal 1064:Thanks for the example. 1042:19:46, May 2, 2005 (UTC) 1000:21:31, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 985:16:51, Apr 29, 2005 (UTC) 970:16:47, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 906:List of masts by location 897:16:47, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 844:I wonder if the table in 841:11:08, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 815:01:03, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 787:21:45, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 778:comments on this proposal 725:User changed his vote to 596:05:06, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 581:11:06, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 563:06:05, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 544:04:26, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 385:11:02, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 378:11:06, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 361:05:35, Apr 28, 2005 (UTC) 304:20:43, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC) 80:Outlet Broadcasting Tower 73:Outlet Broadcasting Tower 2524:19:57, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 2514:19:31, 11 May 2005 (UTC) 2498:15:05, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 2467:14:02, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 2435:11:57, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 1978:12:00, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 1923:10:15, 2005 May 4 (UTC) 1798:Vastly encyclopedic data 1709:American Tower Christmas 1547:Transmitter Weisskirchen 1369:this article's Talk page 1193:11:55, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 1151:10:53, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 769:02:32, 18 May 2005 (UTC) 754:14:33, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 657:13:57, May 9, 2005 (UTC) 475:12:17, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) 463:07:03, 30 Apr 2005 (UTC) 453:04:53, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC) 445:22:48, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 397:11:27, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 351:03:18, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 344:02:16, 28 Apr 2005 (UTC) 311:21:45, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 295:19:21, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 286:18:43, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) 157:Cox Radio Tower Security 2532:On the purpose of masts 2484:14:41, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 2453:13:22, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 2419:11:20, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 1994:01:52, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1949:00:42, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1875:18:44, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1849:18:35, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1819:18:27, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1792:16:55, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1752:16:24, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1645:13:33, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1629:13:33, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1569:Transmitter Nordkirchen 1553:transmitter in Germany. 1511:00:01, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1479:23:20, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1455:01:41, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 1446:18:38, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1423:18:32, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1414:15:22, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1404:23:50, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1386:15:58, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1353:15:12, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1327:14:49, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1302:14:23, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1283:03:01, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1270:02:50, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1256:02:42, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1242:02:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1209:12:01, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 1170:10:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 1122:02:13, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 1073:17:36, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 1058:22:42, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1031:15:58, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1013:02:21, 1 May 2005 (UTC) 902:List of masts by height 824:19:38, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 742:14:52, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 705:12:27, 4 May 2005 (UTC) 683:17:24, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 639:13:30, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 622:13:04, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 528:07:58, 9 May 2005 (UTC) 519:02:28, 8 May 2005 (UTC) 506:21:42, 5 May 2005 (UTC) 497:22:10, 3 May 2005 (UTC) 488:10:09, 2 May 2005 (UTC) 1714:Richland Towers Bithlo 1047:microwave relay towers 910:List of masts by owner 1579:Transmitter Roumoules 129:South Dakota TV Tower 55:Issue for discussion 2315:Hearst-Argyle Tower 1585:Transmitter Marnach 1557:Transmitter Ehndorf 1309:m:instruction creep 979:(shameless plug) · 1342:Big Sky Ski Resort 937:transmission tower 692:Encyclopedia of... 553:Spokane Valley, WA 2519:in my lifetime. 2408: 2407: 2030:Warsaw radio mast 2010:Warsaw radio mast 1847: 1750: 1607:Lisnargarvey Mast 1509: 1465:What's the point? 1444: 977:Cleanup Taskforce 969: 896: 443: 438: 285: 133:Corridor TV Tower 127:, which includes 45:Warsaw radio mast 2561: 2024:Number of edits 2015: 2014: 1837: 1740: 1499: 1434: 959: 886: 557:Liberty Lake, WA 441: 436: 275: 258:Masts for which 169:KISS Radio Tower 145:WRJA-TV-FM Tower 2569: 2568: 2564: 2563: 2562: 2560: 2559: 2558: 2549: 2534: 2182:KOLR/KOZK Tower 2087:KXTV/KOVR Tower 2001: 1929: 1885: 1800: 1467: 1365: 1229: 1221: 1134: 1111: 1085: 1051:telephone poles 780: 733:(see below). -- 536: 336:Makes sense. -- 307:Sounds good. -- 269: 199:. (Rename the 192: 120: 57: 29: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 2567: 2565: 2548: 2545: 2533: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2526: 2503: 2502: 2501: 2500: 2499: 2468: 2437: 2436: 2406: 2405: 2402: 2393: 2387: 2386: 2383: 2374: 2368: 2367: 2364: 2355: 2349: 2348: 2345: 2336: 2330: 2329: 2326: 2317: 2311: 2310: 2307: 2298: 2292: 2291: 2288: 2279: 2273: 2272: 2269: 2260: 2254: 2253: 2250: 2241: 2235: 2234: 2231: 2222: 2216: 2215: 2212: 2203: 2197: 2196: 2193: 2184: 2178: 2177: 2174: 2165: 2163:WECT TV6 Tower 2159: 2158: 2155: 2146: 2140: 2139: 2136: 2127: 2121: 2120: 2117: 2108: 2102: 2101: 2098: 2089: 2083: 2082: 2079: 2070: 2064: 2063: 2060: 2051: 2045: 2044: 2041: 2032: 2026: 2025: 2022: 2019: 2000: 1997: 1982: 1981: 1980: 1979: 1928: 1925: 1884: 1881: 1880: 1879: 1878: 1877: 1852: 1851: 1835:TenOfAllTrades 1822: 1821: 1799: 1796: 1795: 1794: 1772: 1771: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1756: 1755: 1754: 1738:TenOfAllTrades 1728: 1727: 1726: 1725: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1721: 1716: 1711: 1706: 1701: 1696: 1691: 1686: 1681: 1676: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1660: 1659: 1634: 1633: 1632: 1631: 1611: 1610: 1604: 1594: 1588: 1582: 1576: 1566: 1560: 1554: 1544: 1537: 1536: 1535: 1534: 1528: 1527: 1526: 1525: 1514: 1513: 1497:TenOfAllTrades 1487: 1486: 1466: 1463: 1462: 1461: 1460: 1459: 1458: 1457: 1432:TenOfAllTrades 1427: 1426: 1425: 1388: 1364: 1361: 1360: 1359: 1358: 1357: 1356: 1355: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1329: 1312: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1272: 1244: 1228: 1222: 1220: 1217: 1216: 1215: 1214: 1213: 1212: 1211: 1194: 1153: 1152: 1133: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1126: 1124: 1110: 1107: 1106: 1105: 1102: 1099: 1092: 1084: 1081: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1077: 1076: 1075: 1062: 1061: 1060: 1005: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 988: 987: 986: 957:TenOfAllTrades 925: 924: 923: 922: 921: 884:TenOfAllTrades 842: 832: 831: 830: 829: 828: 827: 826: 779: 773: 772: 771: 766:SchmuckyTheCat 755: 744: 707: 685: 664: 663: 662: 661: 660: 659: 658: 624: 586: 585: 584: 583: 582: 542:Oliver Chettle 535: 532: 531: 530: 521: 508: 499: 490: 476: 464: 454: 446: 432: 431: 430: 398: 386: 379: 362: 352: 345: 334: 323: 312: 305: 296: 287: 273:TenOfAllTrades 268: 265: 264: 263: 256: 253: 245: 244: 237: 226: 215: 208: 191: 188: 187: 186: 185: 184: 122: 119: 118: 112: 109:External Links 107: 105: 104: 98: 93: 88:North Carolina 77: 56: 53: 52: 51: 48: 41: 28: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 2566: 2557: 2554: 2547:Why deletion? 2546: 2544: 2543: 2540: 2531: 2525: 2522: 2517: 2516: 2515: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2487: 2486: 2485: 2482: 2478: 2474: 2473:List of masts 2469: 2466: 2463: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2451: 2447: 2443: 2439: 2438: 2434: 2431: 2428: 2423: 2422: 2421: 2420: 2417: 2413: 2403: 2401: 2397: 2394: 2392: 2389: 2388: 2384: 2382: 2378: 2375: 2373: 2370: 2369: 2365: 2363: 2359: 2356: 2354: 2351: 2350: 2346: 2344: 2340: 2337: 2335: 2332: 2331: 2327: 2325: 2321: 2318: 2316: 2313: 2312: 2308: 2306: 2302: 2299: 2297: 2294: 2293: 2289: 2287: 2283: 2280: 2278: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2268: 2264: 2261: 2259: 2256: 2255: 2251: 2249: 2245: 2242: 2240: 2237: 2236: 2232: 2230: 2226: 2223: 2221: 2218: 2217: 2213: 2211: 2207: 2204: 2202: 2199: 2198: 2194: 2192: 2188: 2185: 2183: 2180: 2179: 2175: 2173: 2169: 2166: 2164: 2161: 2160: 2156: 2154: 2150: 2147: 2145: 2142: 2141: 2137: 2135: 2131: 2128: 2126: 2125:KCAU TV Tower 2123: 2122: 2118: 2116: 2112: 2109: 2107: 2104: 2103: 2099: 2097: 2093: 2090: 2088: 2085: 2084: 2080: 2078: 2074: 2071: 2069: 2066: 2065: 2061: 2059: 2055: 2052: 2050: 2047: 2046: 2042: 2040: 2036: 2033: 2031: 2028: 2027: 2023: 2021:Date started 2020: 2017: 2016: 2013: 2011: 2006: 2005:List of masts 1998: 1996: 1995: 1991: 1987: 1977: 1974: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1964: 1961: 1958: 1953: 1952: 1951: 1950: 1946: 1942: 1936: 1934: 1926: 1924: 1922: 1918: 1917:List of books 1914: 1910: 1909:encyclopediac 1905: 1904:List of masts 1901: 1897: 1896: 1890: 1889:List of masts 1883:Size matters? 1882: 1876: 1873: 1869: 1864: 1862: 1861:List of masts 1856: 1855: 1854: 1853: 1850: 1845: 1841: 1836: 1832: 1831:List of masts 1828: 1824: 1823: 1820: 1817: 1813: 1809: 1806: 1805: 1804: 1797: 1793: 1790: 1786: 1782: 1778: 1774: 1773: 1769: 1765: 1761: 1760: 1753: 1748: 1744: 1739: 1734: 1733: 1732: 1731: 1730: 1729: 1720: 1717: 1715: 1712: 1710: 1707: 1705: 1702: 1700: 1697: 1695: 1692: 1690: 1687: 1685: 1682: 1680: 1677: 1675: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1668: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1657: 1653: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1649: 1648: 1647: 1646: 1643: 1639: 1630: 1627: 1623: 1619: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1612: 1608: 1605: 1602: 1598: 1595: 1592: 1589: 1586: 1583: 1580: 1577: 1574: 1570: 1567: 1564: 1561: 1558: 1555: 1552: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1539: 1538: 1532: 1531: 1530: 1529: 1522: 1521:List of masts 1518: 1517: 1516: 1515: 1512: 1507: 1503: 1498: 1494: 1493:List of masts 1489: 1488: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1477: 1473: 1456: 1453: 1449: 1448: 1447: 1442: 1438: 1433: 1428: 1424: 1421: 1417: 1416: 1415: 1412: 1407: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1387: 1383: 1379: 1374: 1373: 1372: 1370: 1362: 1354: 1351: 1347: 1343: 1338: 1337: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1333: 1328: 1325: 1321: 1317: 1313: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1300: 1296: 1292: 1288: 1284: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1271: 1268: 1264: 1259: 1258: 1257: 1253: 1249: 1245: 1243: 1240: 1236: 1231: 1230: 1226: 1223: 1218: 1210: 1207: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1192: 1189: 1186: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1172: 1171: 1168: 1164: 1160: 1157: 1156: 1155: 1154: 1150: 1147: 1144: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1131: 1127: 1125: 1123: 1120: 1116: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1103: 1100: 1097: 1096:List of masts 1093: 1090: 1089:List of masts 1087: 1086: 1082: 1074: 1071: 1067: 1063: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1048: 1044: 1043: 1041: 1040: 1034: 1033: 1032: 1028: 1024: 1020: 1016: 1015: 1014: 1011: 1006: 999: 996: 993: 989: 984: 983: 978: 974: 973: 972: 971: 967: 963: 958: 953: 952: 950: 946: 942: 938: 934: 930: 929:List of masts 926: 919: 915: 911: 907: 903: 899: 898: 894: 890: 885: 881: 880:List of masts 877: 873: 868: 863: 862: 860: 856: 851: 847: 846:List of masts 843: 840: 837: 833: 825: 822: 817: 816: 814: 810: 806: 802: 801: 799: 798: 793: 789: 788: 786: 782: 781: 777: 774: 770: 767: 763: 759: 756: 753: 748: 745: 743: 740: 736: 732: 728: 724: 722: 718: 713: 708: 706: 703: 698: 695:stops on the 693: 689: 686: 684: 681: 677: 672: 671:List of masts 668: 665: 656: 653: 650: 646: 642: 641: 640: 637: 633: 629: 628:controversial 625: 623: 620: 616: 612: 611: 609: 606: 603: 600:information. 598: 597: 595: 591: 587: 580: 577: 574: 570: 566:Oliver -: --> 565: 564: 562: 558: 554: 550: 546: 545: 543: 538: 537: 533: 529: 526: 522: 520: 517: 514: 509: 507: 504: 500: 498: 495: 491: 489: 486: 482: 481:List of Masts 477: 474: 470: 465: 462: 458: 455: 452: 447: 444: 439: 433: 429: 427: 423: 418: 413: 412: 410: 407: 403: 399: 396: 392: 387: 384: 380: 377: 374: 371: 367: 363: 360: 357: 353: 350: 346: 343: 339: 335: 332: 328: 324: 321: 317: 313: 310: 306: 303: 302: 297: 294: 290: 288: 283: 279: 274: 271: 270: 266: 261: 257: 254: 251: 250:List of masts 247: 246: 243:or the like). 242: 238: 235: 231: 227: 224: 220: 216: 213: 209: 206: 202: 198: 197:List of masts 194: 193: 189: 183: 180: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 170: 166: 162: 158: 154: 153:KTMD-TV Tower 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 126: 117: 114: 113: 111: 110: 103: 102:List of masts 100: 99: 97: 96: 91: 89: 85: 81: 76: 74: 70: 66: 62: 61:List of masts 54: 49: 46: 42: 39: 38:list of masts 36:The table in 35: 34: 33: 26: 19: 2552: 2550: 2535: 2507:Tony Sidaway 2477:Tony Sidaway 2446:Tony Sidaway 2412:Tony Sidaway 2409: 2068:KXJB-TV mast 2049:KVLY-TV mast 2002: 1983: 1937: 1932: 1930: 1927:Changed vote 1916: 1903: 1895:article size 1892: 1886: 1868:Tony Sidaway 1858: 1826: 1812:Tony Sidaway 1801: 1785:Tony Sidaway 1780: 1776: 1763: 1655: 1638:Tony Sidaway 1635: 1622:Tony Sidaway 1618:at this time 1617: 1600: 1572: 1472:Tony Sidaway 1468: 1366: 1345: 1320:Tony Sidaway 1294: 1290: 1276:Tony Sidaway 1263:Tony Sidaway 1235:Tony Sidaway 1224: 1202:Tony Sidaway 1197: 1179: 1175: 1163:Tony Sidaway 1158: 1138: 1115:Tony Sidaway 1038: 981: 866: 849: 804: 796: 791: 775: 761: 757: 746: 735:Tony Sidaway 729:at 00:42 on 726: 711: 709: 691: 687: 676:Tony Sidaway 666: 632:Tony Sidaway 627: 614: 589: 568: 416: 414: 300: 259: 240: 233: 229: 222: 218: 211: 204: 200: 121: 108: 106: 94: 92: 79: 78: 58: 30: 2521:Vegaswikian 2277:AFLAC Tower 2111:17 November 2035:16 November 1911:? It is an 1066:Sutro Tower 1019:Sutro Tower 805:really good 792:substantial 697:Random Page 549:Spokane, WA 525:Vegaswikian 260:substantial 212:Coordinates 65:radio masts 27:Conclusions 2396:7 November 2391:WCTV Tower 2377:7 November 2372:KTVE-Tower 2358:7 November 2353:WCSC-Tower 2334:WTTO Tower 2301:7 November 2296:WBTV-Tower 2244:7 November 2239:WEAU-Tower 2206:7 November 2144:KATV Tower 2106:KLDE Tower 2054:7 November 1363:Discussion 1198:nearly all 1083:Proposal 2 941:radio mast 712:notability 451:Gene_poole 417:notability 406:User:Mulad 366:Good Thing 203:column as 190:Proposal 1 2539:Sandpiper 2442:WOI-Tower 2201:WOI-Tower 2073:8 January 1986:Wahoofive 1941:Wahoofive 1396:Wahoofive 1378:Wahoofive 1350:Unfocused 1299:Unfocused 1291:obviously 1248:Wahoofive 1023:Wahoofive 945:Wahoofive 914:Wahoofive 855:Wahoofive 717:Wahoofive 702:Unfocused 619:Unfocused 485:Sjakkalle 449:manner.-- 422:Wahoofive 234:Ownership 179:Sandpiper 2553:any kind 2339:24 April 2320:24 April 2282:23 April 2187:15 April 2168:15 April 2149:11 April 2130:31 March 2092:28 March 2018:Article 1857:You say 1768:April 12 1420:Carnildo 1055:Carnildo 1039:Katefan0 982:Katefan0 943:, etc. — 912:, etc. — 797:Katefan0 785:Carnildo 762:anything 594:Klonimus 569:redirect 561:Carnildo 513:Dpbsmith 503:R. fiend 494:Gazpacho 383:RussBlau 309:Carnildo 301:Katefan0 205:Location 95:See Also 2263:2 March 2225:1 March 1913:almanac 1844:contrib 1747:contrib 1506:contrib 1441:contrib 1219:Neutral 1159:Comment 1109:Support 966:contrib 893:contrib 457:Zzyzx11 282:contrib 267:Support 223:Purpose 201:Country 84:Clayton 2493:adiant 2462:adiant 2430:adiant 1973:adiant 1960:adiant 1933:Oppose 1656:didn't 1188:adiant 1146:adiant 1132:Oppose 995:adiant 927:Also, 839:(talk) 836:Meelar 809:Calton 758:Oppose 752:SimonP 747:Oppose 727:Oppose 700:so.)-- 688:Oppose 667:Oppose 652:adiant 605:adiant 576:adiant 534:Oppose 516:(talk) 469:SteveW 442:(talk) 409:(talk) 373:adiant 359:(talk) 356:Meelar 327:Calton 293:msh210 1921:Nabla 1777:could 1452:Barno 1411:Barno 1225:Brief 1070:Quale 1010:Quale 821:Barno 803:Or a 776:Brief 731:5 May 349:nixie 230:Owner 16:< 2511:Talk 2481:Talk 2450:Talk 2416:Talk 2400:2004 2381:2004 2362:2004 2343:2004 2324:2004 2305:2004 2286:2004 2267:2005 2248:2004 2229:2005 2210:2004 2191:2004 2172:2004 2153:2004 2134:2004 2115:2004 2096:2004 2077:2004 2058:2003 2039:2003 1990:talk 1945:talk 1872:Talk 1840:talk 1827:good 1816:Talk 1810:. -- 1789:Talk 1743:talk 1642:Talk 1626:Talk 1502:talk 1495:. -- 1476:Talk 1437:talk 1400:talk 1382:talk 1324:Talk 1280:Talk 1267:Talk 1252:talk 1239:Talk 1206:Talk 1180:most 1176:some 1167:Talk 1139:most 1119:Talk 1053:. -- 1027:talk 962:talk 949:Talk 933:mast 918:talk 889:talk 882:. -- 859:Talk 850:four 813:Talk 739:Talk 721:Talk 680:Talk 643:See 636:Talk 555:and 473:Talk 461:Talk 426:Talk 395:Meow 342:Tark 331:Talk 320:talk 316:SPUI 278:talk 219:Uses 167:for 159:and 2347:16 2328:13 2309:11 2290:12 2214:10 2195:18 2176:14 2157:15 2138:15 2119:11 2100:18 2081:20 2062:44 2043:63 1891:is 1781:why 1764:now 1551:AFN 867:use 437:CDC 391:iMb 241:FCC 232:or 221:or 69:FCC 2496:_* 2465:_* 2433:_* 2410:-- 2404:8 2385:7 2366:6 2271:6 2252:8 2233:9 1992:) 1976:_* 1963:_* 1947:) 1636:-- 1430:-- 1402:) 1384:) 1371:. 1254:) 1191:_* 1149:_* 1029:) 998:_* 955:-- 939:, 935:, 908:, 904:, 874:, 811:| 674:-- 655:_* 608:_* 579:_* 483:. 471:| 459:| 389:-- 376:_* 368:. 340:| 338:JP 329:| 325:-- 314:-- 298:· 236:). 225:). 214:). 207:). 155:, 151:, 147:, 143:, 139:, 135:, 131:, 86:, 47:). 2509:| 2490:R 2479:| 2459:R 2448:| 2427:R 2414:| 2398:, 2379:, 2360:, 2341:, 2322:, 2303:, 2284:, 2265:, 2246:, 2227:, 2208:, 2189:, 2170:, 2151:, 2132:, 2113:, 2094:, 2075:, 2056:, 2037:, 1988:( 1970:R 1957:R 1943:( 1939:— 1870:| 1846:) 1842:/ 1838:( 1814:| 1787:| 1749:) 1745:/ 1741:( 1640:| 1624:| 1603:. 1575:. 1508:) 1504:/ 1500:( 1474:| 1443:) 1439:/ 1435:( 1398:( 1380:( 1376:— 1322:| 1278:| 1265:| 1250:( 1237:| 1204:| 1185:R 1165:| 1143:R 1117:| 1098:. 1025:( 992:R 968:) 964:/ 960:( 947:( 916:( 895:) 891:/ 887:( 870:( 857:( 737:| 719:( 715:— 678:| 649:R 634:| 602:R 573:R 424:( 420:— 404:— 393:~ 370:R 318:( 291:— 284:) 280:/ 276:(

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge (XXG)

:Deletion policy/Masts - Knowledge (XXG)

Index