613:. The delete reasoning gave no reason at CFD as to why the category was not defining, so it was error to not give less weight to the deletion arguments in the close. As for the keep arguments related to defining characteristics, they argued strong feelings about infanticide and established defining characteristic in the real world through an existing Knowledge (XXG) category. In addition to not providing reasons as to why the category was not a defining characteristic, the delete arguments never rebutted these keep assertions about defining characteristics. I don't think the keep reasons related to defining characteristics should have been given less weight in the close. --
403:
one word "delete" and no supporting justification. As pointed out above, procedures for recreation of articles seem to utterly fail in the topsy turvy CfD world, in which every effort at recreation is met with knee-jerk delete votes, regardless of any changes made to the category, and no mechanism exists to address these concerns on recreation even where they might be legitimate. The current size of the category is no obstacle for future expansion and no justification has been offered to show that
509:- Unpopulated categories that have been unpopulated for at least four days is a speedy delete basis. The fact that no one sought speedy delete for this category and that there is a very strong likelihood of populating this newly created category makes underpopulation a very weak CFD argument for this category. "A defining characteristic, and to mirror the real world cat of
1079:) 01:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC) Please add the page i created to wiki. It was a page recreated from a deleted page a few months ago. this actor now has much more notability as he has appeared in 4 feature films and tv series. He has recently completed filming the starring role in a film to be released next year worldwide.
1259:
There probably is other material, but his common name, particular with that of another more popular actor, makes it hard to find soruces. Since the last AfD was on 13 March 2007 and new source material has been generated since then, I think allowing recreation and another AfD might bring out enought
788:
Because it's highly unlikely that the first edit made by a unique editor at a particular IP address would be a relatively obscure discussion at DRV. How long were you a user before you even figured out DRV existed? It could just be a user who is usually logged in but failed to do so this time, or it
402:
Despite a repeated pattern of controversial CfD closes, Kbdank71 has offered no policy justification for why consensus should be interpreted per his insistence. XfD closes where there is a clear policy argument for retention and a strong consensus supporting that case should never be closed with the
535:
for that day, you'll see numerous fictional categories up for deletion essentially raising the same "all fictional categories have problems" and "you can't apply
Knowledge (XXG):Categorization to them" because they are not real. What this comes down to is strength of arguments. The delete reasoning
369:
Technically, it would be easier. Since it is a catagory, you would just make a simple list on your user page or subpage. There really isn't any text to a category other than wikilinks, after all. My main concern here is still that I don't see a concensus to delete in the deletion discussion. To
262:
as closer. I gave less weight to the "defining characteristic" argument, as there was no reasoning or backup for that statement. As such, the "per 'defining characteristic' argument" also received less weight. In addition, there was questions on whether or not one of the two articles should have
1282:
that someone will be notable when, .... , and almost impossible to refute. Second, more frequent with athletes but also in all fields, to what extent notability in what amounts to a junior league is notability. Basic questions, and not really helpful to discuss one at a time with erratic results.
1281:
Two frequently recurring situations. First, as often with performers, but in other contexts also: he is not quite notable now, but after some work in progress is released he probably will be. It seems a little pedantic to delete the article at this point, but on the other hand it's too easy to say
638:
as No
Consensus. I don't dabble in CFD, but it looks like here there was more discussion to be had about this category and whether or not it was appropriate...I certainly didn't see any sort of consensus on anything. I say overturn, have that discussion, and re-nominate if it becomes necessary.
349:
for articles, there is a way of proceeding even after a deletion review has been unsuccessful, which is to rewrite in user space a much improved article that answers all the objections and ask people to look again--and we frequently accept articles where that has been done. But I don't see any
214:
is that a review of the actual deletion discussion makes it very clear that there was no concensus to delete (even !votes on both sides of the issue as well). The closing admin didn't give a reason for the deletion, so it is difficult to determine what their reasons were. To be honest, the
175:
The CfD was closed as delete, but I feel no such consensus was reached. Apart from the nominator, there were 2 people !voting to delete, 2 !voting to keep, the category creator commenting, and one other person commenting. If the closer wished to delete even though consensus was lacking, an
517:
1. All fictional categories have problems because "we are referring to something from the age of myth here." 2. Fictional parents who killed their children" is a fictional category. 3. Since fictional parents who killed their children is a fictional category, it should be deleted. and
1578:, page, this article is referenced. It was deleted for the reason of "non-encyclopedic topic". I fail to see how this is non-encyclopedic. It is one of the major subsets of the warez scene (which is considered a valid topic), and is not given much detail on the general warez pages.
690:
Would creating a deletion sorting that focused on relisted discussions be a possibility? (That'd require CfDs to be transcluded and relisted, however) (I'm referring to relisting as in an admin deciding to extend the time of discussion, not as in something coming back after DRV)
604:
The nominator argued that killing "someone" is not a defining characteristic and another editor argued that a "choice or preference" to kill someone is not a defining characteristic. Neither of these had anything to do with the actual category for an
530:
should be given less weight. The first approach justifies deleting all fictional categories and the second approach removes a need for the closer to give any weight to the keep arguments. Both of thse approaches are entirely wrong. If you look at
1330:. Doesn't yet seem be yet ready for another AfD. Requester is invited work on a draft in userspace, explore whether inside Knowledge (XXG) there are other areas of interest for him and should stick to one account in any case. --
536:
failed to apply a deletion standard that would justify deleting this particular fictional category while keeping other fictional categories. The keep arguments were strong in logic and policy. The close should be overturned. --
673:
A reasonable category, and no consensus to delete it. There needs to be a way of calling those few CfDs worth a more general discussion to sufficient attention. This was not a sufficient discussion to warrant deletion .
1545:
1345:
below are a few websites which hopefully will get the article on him published on wiki. he really does deserve inclusion, especially if you look at some other actors listed, who have not done much work in the business.
156:
88:
on this aspect of categorisation, and that guidance, conveniently summarised below by JzG, determined the outcome.For the record, CfD discussions are relisted, not as often as AfD ones, but they are all the same. –
1042:
563:
I'd be more than happy to provide sources, but reliable and verifiable sources have not been accepted at CfD. Tell me how many sources you need to convince you and I'll do my best to get them for you.
532:
199:
169:
760:
No other edits by this particular IP address have been made (I haven't checked if any related IP addresses have made contributions, though). I hope no more incidents like this occur.
486:
I did not say a single CfD-style argument in this DRV request. I feel that the first comment in this discussion that turned it into CfD deux was Kbdank71's endorse as closer comment.
1505:
202:(the nom text didn't parse the address). I am not personally in favor of categories that have only TWO articles listed in them, but it was only two weeks old and was split off of
1224:
Calvin Dean, who is just finishing his second year of a BA degree course at the
Mountview Performing Arts Academy in London, has been given a full scholarship for his final year.
1539:
81:
473:
1036:
51:
37:
1002:
46:
450:, closer is not required to close with more than a one-word decision, though it may be helpful. It's certainly not a good reason to overturn the decision.
710:
per the closer's rationale, reiterated above, which I agree with. This falls easily within the reasonable boundaries of discretion for the closing admin.
267:, there was discussion about the size of the category, and in the month from creation to deletion, there were as mentioned only two articles added. --
806:(sock or meat), an IP user's opinion shouldn't be treated any differently than anyone else's. It shouldn't matter how many other edits they have. --
1469:
1464:
1473:
140:
425:
The reason his closes seem "controversial" may have something to do with the number of them that you've brought to DRV recently. Just a thought.
132:
1497:
1456:
123:
76:
42:
749:
728:
1371:
Those don't seem to be independent, reliable sources. I would be looking for newspapers, academic journals, books, TV programmes, etc.
774:
Why is this an "incident". While this would likely be discounted, it does appear to represent a sincerely held view on this situation.
753:
1560:
1527:
577:
DRV is not to continue the CFD. There was no reason at the CFD why it's defining, so it was given less weight in the close. --
510:
203:
21:
966:
961:
85:
970:
206:, leaving the original category as non-fictional. Not enough time has been given for it to develop and the idea of breaking
513:" as a way of not mixing fiction and nonfiction is a strong keep argument. The delete arguments amounted to two approaches.
1057:
656:
per Alan and Suntag. I simply cannot see this as being plausibly backed up by either policy or the consensus discussion.
447:
1227:
1213:
1024:
994:
953:
1586:
1436:
1391:
933:
884:
107:
17:
1521:
527:
523:
407:
issues could never be addressed. One whole month is not exactly the last opportunity to add entries to a category.
1517:
1460:
1179:
1018:
526:
to fictional categories because the cannot be couched in real world terms. 2. Thus, keep arguments citing to
1567:
1421:
1376:
1156:
1139:
745:
732:
250:
93:
210:
off as a separate category seems to make both categories more accurate (and useful to boot). What matters
1452:
1425:
1412:
1380:
1365:
1339:
1322:
1293:
1273:
1195:
1171:
1160:
1143:
1115:
1088:
922:
873:
848:
815:
797:
783:
769:
736:
719:
700:
685:
665:
648:
626:
595:
581:
572:
558:
549:
495:
481:
466:
454:
434:
416:
392:
361:
341:
318:
302:
286:
271:
254:
233:
189:
96:
446:. No misinterpretation by closer has occurred, as demonstrated by his explanation of the rationale used.
1301:. Userfy or allow recreation in userspace, but do not move to article space, or even list at AfD until
1175:
1014:
741:
471:
Note: since "CfD 2" has apparently become a common theme in some recent DRVs, I ask the closer to take
1361:
1357:
1302:
1084:
1080:
1076:
1072:
918:
910:
332:- no procedural errors in the close and the deletion was well within the closing admin's discretion.
295:
Ugh. Why is the category in question showing up at the bottom of the DRV page? Can someone fix that?
857:
263:
even been in the category, which would have left one article. While nobody came right out and said
1553:
1318:
1064:
1050:
844:
811:
794:
644:
591:
462:- per otherendorsers above. (No need to re-type the presumably obvious.) And DRV isn't CfD deux. -
451:
296:
280:
1533:
1351:
176:
explanation would have been helpful, but this was not done in the discussion or in response to my
1335:
1242:
779:
715:
586:
This is not a court of appeals. We're allowed to take new facts into account if they show up. --
568:
430:
412:
384:
337:
225:
177:
90:
554:"A defining characteristic" with no reason why is not a strong argument in logic or policy. --
661:
1123:
803:
1575:
1264:
1233:
1218:
1204:
1186:
1106:
957:
765:
696:
617:
540:
491:
185:
1306:
790:
374:, wouldn't that be the same as a second deletion article? (ie: second bite at the cherry)
242:
1254:
914:
789:
could be a case of sockpuppetry. We don't immediately assume it's sockpuppetry because of
1501:
1127:
1030:
998:
404:
264:
160:
1314:
840:
807:
640:
587:
1310:
1131:
1331:
1289:
868:
862:
775:
711:
681:
578:
564:
555:
426:
408:
375:
357:
333:
315:
268:
216:
657:
370:
me, that trumps the content. If we sit here and decide the fate purely on content
1490:
987:
1417:
1372:
1347:
1261:
1183:
1152:
1135:
1103:
949:
905:
761:
692:
614:
537:
487:
246:
215:
discussion wasn't exactly full of informative policy remarks from either side.
181:
1208:
1182:(17 June 2008) previously were noticed regarding deletions of this topic. --
478:
463:
860:
reasons to keep; a tiny category based on a random intersection of ideas.
350:
equivalent for a category, nor--unfortunately-- can I easily imagine one.
1284:
839:. Bad close. The discussion does not reflect a consensus to delete. --
676:
352:
727:. Obvious lack of consensus to delete, should have been closed as keep.
1099:
1095:
1350:
this is from the producers website for the upcoming film 'Tormented'.
241:: Doesn't seem to be any consensus, but the category seems to violate
1203:- The last AfD was on 13 March 2007. Calvin Dean is popular with the
793:, but it certainly is at least "suspect"or "weird", you might say.
84:
says to weigh the strength of arguments, not count heads. There is
1352:
http://www.britfilms.com/britishfilms/inprogress/?&skip=120
1260:
sources (or establish that not enought material exists). --
1354:
half way down the page lists calvin as being in the film
1305:
or someone else can justify inclusion with reference to
913:
if you would like the content userfied for more work. –
1486:
1482:
1478:
983:
979:
975:
477:
into consideration if/when weighing such discussion. -
311:
148:
144:
136:
128:
1552:
1049:
1229:. A non trivial article entirely about Calvin is at
124:
Category:Fictional parents who killed their children
77:
Category:Fictional parents who killed their children
1566:
1231:"Polruan actor's movie role with Hollywood stars".
1063:
279:per Kbdank71. Overly small and narrow category.
1416:– Automatically restored as a contested PROD –
1211:article that mention him. Here's a trivial one
1214:"Theatre club celebrates birthday at Gallants"
1348:http://www.slingshot-studios.com/blog/page/3/
8:
1435:The following is an archived debate of the
932:The following is an archived debate of the
106:The following is an archived debate of the
1405:
898:
511:Category:Parents who killed their children
204:Category:Parents who killed their children
69:
1094:This DRV is about National Youth Theatre
856:. Policy reasons for deletion outweigh
41:
50:
1250:
1240:
33:
1151:due to lack of non-trivial coverage.
7:
198:I am guessing you are talking about
1589:of the page listed in the heading.
1394:of the page listed in the heading.
887:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
1201:Allow recreation and list at AfD
1585:The above is an archive of the
1390:The above is an archive of the
883:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
1126:some sources (which should be
528:Knowledge (XXG):Categorization
524:Knowledge (XXG):Categorization
180:on Kbdank71's user talk page.
1:
30:
1426:08:20, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
1381:08:54, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
1366:22:07, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
1340:09:00, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
1323:11:07, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
1294:19:38, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
1274:15:56, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
1196:15:20, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
1161:13:50, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
1144:08:14, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
1116:15:32, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
1089:01:54, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
923:18:49, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
874:11:38, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
849:09:17, 21 October 2008 (UTC)
816:07:38, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
798:06:59, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
784:00:31, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
770:00:18, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
737:13:12, 18 October 2008 (UTC)
720:21:56, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
701:00:55, 19 October 2008 (UTC)
686:01:10, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
666:16:08, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
649:15:30, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
627:22:33, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
596:15:32, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
582:15:28, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
573:15:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
559:15:02, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
550:14:49, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
496:21:37, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
482:17:25, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
467:12:56, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
455:02:07, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
435:03:41, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
417:01:13, 16 October 2008 (UTC)
393:19:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
362:18:57, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
342:17:26, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
319:14:31, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
303:14:04, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
287:14:03, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
272:13:17, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
255:13:05, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
234:12:06, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
190:11:34, 15 October 2008 (UTC)
97:23:00, 22 October 2008 (UTC)
1207:, as there are about eight
802:Unless there's evidence of
1612:
1237:. January 30, 2008. p. 7.
1178:(23 September 2007), and
178:request for clarification
1592:Please do not modify it.
1442:Please do not modify it.
1397:Please do not modify it.
1222:. June 22, 2006. p. 12.
939:Please do not modify it.
890:Please do not modify it.
196:Overturn as no concensus
113:Please do not modify it.
80:– Deletion is endorsed.
43:Deletion review archives
1439:of the article above.
936:of the article above.
110:of the article above.
754:few or no other edits
1453:Zero day information
1413:Zero_day_information
1174:(19 February 2007),
1071:UNDELETE_NOTABILITY
756:outside this topic.
522:1. You cannot apply
448:Per current practice
1134:the above claims?
388:
380:
301:and his otters •
285:and his otters •
229:
221:
1599:
1598:
1574:Reading from the
1404:
1403:
897:
896:
872:
757:
389:
386:
381:
378:
230:
227:
222:
219:
200:this conversation
60:
59:
1603:
1594:
1576:Standard_(warez)
1571:
1570:
1556:
1509:
1494:
1476:
1444:
1406:
1399:
1269:
1258:
1252:
1248:
1246:
1238:
1234:Cornish Guardian
1226:
1219:Cornish Guardian
1209:Cornish Guardian
1205:Cornish Guardian
1191:
1111:
1096:Calvin Dean (II)
1068:
1067:
1053:
1006:
991:
973:
941:
899:
892:
866:
739:
622:
545:
385:
377:
299:
298:Ten Pound Hammer
283:
282:Ten Pound Hammer
226:
218:
164:
153:
152:
115:
70:
56:
36:
31:
1611:
1610:
1606:
1605:
1604:
1602:
1601:
1600:
1590:
1587:deletion review
1513:
1495:
1467:
1451:
1440:
1437:deletion review
1395:
1392:deletion review
1270:
1267:
1249:
1239:
1230:
1212:
1192:
1189:
1122:Can you please
1112:
1109:
1100:Calvin Dean (I)
1010:
992:
964:
948:
937:
934:deletion review
888:
885:deletion review
795:Good Ol’factory
623:
620:
546:
543:
452:Good Ol’factory
297:
281:
245:. I'm neutral.
154:
126:
122:
111:
108:deletion review
68:
65:15 October 2008
61:
54:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
1609:
1607:
1597:
1596:
1581:
1580:
1512:
1447:
1446:
1431:
1430:
1429:
1428:
1402:
1401:
1386:
1385:
1384:
1383:
1343:
1342:
1325:
1296:
1276:
1266:
1198:
1188:
1180:David crozer08
1165:
1164:
1163:
1119:
1118:
1108:
1009:
944:
943:
928:
927:
926:
925:
895:
894:
879:
878:
877:
876:
851:
826:
825:
824:
823:
822:
821:
820:
819:
818:
722:
705:
704:
703:
668:
651:
633:
632:
631:
630:
629:
619:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
542:
503:
502:
501:
500:
499:
498:
457:
440:
439:
438:
437:
420:
419:
397:
396:
395:
344:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
306:
305:
290:
289:
274:
257:
236:
167:
118:
117:
102:
101:
100:
99:
91:Angus McLellan
67:
62:
58:
57:
49:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1608:
1595:
1593:
1588:
1583:
1582:
1579:
1577:
1572:
1569:
1565:
1562:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1547:
1544:
1541:
1538:
1535:
1532:
1529:
1526:
1523:
1519:
1516:
1515:Find sources:
1510:
1507:
1503:
1499:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1475:
1471:
1466:
1462:
1458:
1454:
1449:
1448:
1445:
1443:
1438:
1433:
1432:
1427:
1423:
1419:
1415:
1414:
1410:
1409:
1408:
1407:
1400:
1398:
1393:
1388:
1387:
1382:
1378:
1374:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1363:
1359:
1355:
1353:
1349:
1341:
1337:
1333:
1329:
1326:
1324:
1320:
1316:
1312:
1308:
1304:
1300:
1297:
1295:
1291:
1287:
1286:
1280:
1277:
1275:
1272:
1271:
1263:
1256:
1244:
1236:
1235:
1228:
1225:
1221:
1220:
1215:
1210:
1206:
1202:
1199:
1197:
1194:
1193:
1185:
1181:
1177:
1173:
1169:
1166:
1162:
1158:
1154:
1150:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1125:
1121:
1120:
1117:
1114:
1113:
1105:
1101:
1097:
1093:
1092:
1091:
1090:
1086:
1082:
1078:
1074:
1069:
1066:
1062:
1059:
1056:
1052:
1048:
1044:
1041:
1038:
1035:
1032:
1029:
1026:
1023:
1020:
1016:
1013:
1012:Find sources:
1007:
1004:
1000:
996:
989:
985:
981:
977:
972:
968:
963:
959:
955:
951:
946:
945:
942:
940:
935:
930:
929:
924:
920:
916:
912:
908:
907:
903:
902:
901:
900:
893:
891:
886:
881:
880:
875:
870:
865:
864:
859:
855:
852:
850:
846:
842:
838:
834:
830:
827:
817:
813:
809:
805:
801:
800:
799:
796:
792:
787:
786:
785:
781:
777:
773:
772:
771:
767:
763:
759:
758:
755:
751:
747:
743:
742:71.235.38.171
738:
734:
730:
729:71.235.38.171
726:
723:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
702:
698:
694:
689:
688:
687:
683:
679:
678:
672:
669:
667:
663:
659:
655:
652:
650:
646:
642:
637:
634:
628:
625:
624:
616:
612:
609:of killing a
608:
603:
597:
593:
589:
585:
584:
583:
580:
576:
575:
574:
570:
566:
562:
561:
560:
557:
553:
552:
551:
548:
547:
539:
534:
529:
525:
521:
516:
512:
508:
505:
504:
497:
493:
489:
485:
484:
483:
480:
476:
475:
470:
469:
468:
465:
461:
458:
456:
453:
449:
445:
442:
441:
436:
432:
428:
424:
423:
422:
421:
418:
414:
410:
406:
401:
398:
394:
390:
382:
373:
368:
365:
364:
363:
359:
355:
354:
348:
345:
343:
339:
335:
331:
328:
327:
320:
317:
313:
310:
309:
308:
307:
304:
300:
294:
293:
292:
291:
288:
284:
278:
275:
273:
270:
266:
261:
258:
256:
252:
248:
244:
240:
237:
235:
231:
223:
213:
209:
205:
201:
197:
194:
193:
192:
191:
187:
183:
179:
173:
171:
165:
162:
158:
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
130:
125:
120:
119:
116:
114:
109:
104:
103:
98:
95:
92:
87:
83:
79:
78:
74:
73:
72:
71:
66:
63:
53:
48:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
1591:
1584:
1573:
1563:
1557:
1549:
1542:
1536:
1530:
1524:
1514:
1450:
1441:
1434:
1411:
1396:
1389:
1356:
1344:
1327:
1298:
1283:
1278:
1265:
1232:
1223:
1217:
1200:
1187:
1172:David crozer
1167:
1148:
1107:
1070:
1060:
1054:
1046:
1039:
1033:
1027:
1021:
1011:
947:
938:
931:
904:
889:
882:
861:
853:
836:
833:no consensus
832:
828:
724:
707:
675:
670:
653:
635:
618:
610:
606:
541:
519:
514:
506:
472:
459:
443:
399:
371:
366:
351:
346:
329:
276:
259:
238:
211:
207:
195:
174:
121:
112:
105:
75:
64:
47:2008 October
1540:free images
1176:Mountview07
1037:free images
950:Calvin Dean
906:Calvin Dean
752:) has made
405:WP:OC#SMALL
265:WP:OC#SMALL
1358:David19856
1303:David19856
1081:David19856
1073:David19856
915:Eluchil404
858:WP:ILIKEIT
474:this essay
82:The manual
52:October 16
38:October 14
1315:SmokeyJoe
1253:ignored (
1251:|section=
1243:cite news
841:SmokeyJoe
808:UsaSatsui
641:UsaSatsui
588:UsaSatsui
367:My Answer
208:Fictional
1332:Tikiwont
1128:reliable
829:Overturn
804:puppetry
776:Alansohn
750:contribs
725:Overturn
712:Eusebeus
671:Overturn
654:overturn
636:Overturn
579:Kbdank71
565:Alansohn
556:Kbdank71
507:Overturn
427:Otto4711
409:Alansohn
400:Overturn
347:Question
334:Otto4711
316:Kbdank71
269:Kbdank71
86:guidance
20: |
1546:WP refs
1534:scholar
1498:restore
1470:protect
1465:history
1328:Endorse
1299:Endorse
1279:Comment
1168:Comment
1149:Endorse
1043:WP refs
1031:scholar
995:restore
967:protect
962:history
854:Endorse
708:Endorse
658:JoshuaZ
533:the log
460:Endorse
444:Endorse
379:HARMBOY
330:Endorse
277:Endorse
260:Endorse
239:Comment
220:HARMBOY
157:restore
137:history
1518:Google
1474:delete
1418:Stifle
1373:Stifle
1307:WP:BIO
1262:Suntag
1184:Suntag
1153:Stifle
1136:Stifle
1132:verify
1104:Suntag
1098:, not
1015:Google
971:delete
837:relist
791:WP:AGF
762:Andjam
693:Andjam
615:Suntag
607:action
538:Suntag
520:Second
488:Andjam
247:Stifle
243:WP:NOR
182:Andjam
94:(Talk)
1561:JSTOR
1522:books
1502:cache
1491:views
1483:watch
1479:links
1313:. --
1130:) to
1102:. --
1058:JSTOR
1019:books
999:cache
988:views
980:watch
976:links
869:Help!
611:child
515:First
312:fixed
161:cache
145:watch
141:links
55:: -->
16:<
1554:FENS
1528:news
1487:logs
1461:talk
1457:edit
1422:talk
1377:talk
1362:talk
1336:talk
1319:talk
1311:WP:N
1290:talk
1255:help
1157:talk
1140:talk
1124:cite
1085:talk
1077:talk
1051:FENS
1025:news
984:logs
958:talk
954:edit
919:talk
845:talk
812:talk
780:talk
766:talk
746:talk
733:talk
716:talk
697:talk
682:talk
662:talk
645:talk
592:talk
569:talk
492:talk
479:jc37
464:jc37
431:talk
413:talk
387:TALK
372:here
358:talk
338:talk
314:. --
251:talk
228:TALK
212:most
186:talk
149:logs
133:talk
129:edit
35:<
1568:TWL
1506:AfD
1309:or
1285:DGG
1065:TWL
1003:AfD
911:Ask
863:Guy
835:or
831:as
677:DGG
353:DGG
170:CFD
22:Log
1548:)
1504:|
1500:|
1489:|
1485:|
1481:|
1477:|
1472:|
1468:|
1463:|
1459:|
1424:)
1379:)
1364:)
1338:)
1321:)
1292:)
1247::
1245:}}
1241:{{
1216:.
1170:-
1159:)
1142:)
1087:)
1045:)
1001:|
997:|
986:|
982:|
978:|
974:|
969:|
965:|
960:|
956:|
921:)
909:–
847:)
814:)
782:)
768:)
748:•
740:—
735:)
718:)
699:)
684:)
664:)
647:)
639:--
594:)
571:)
494:)
433:)
415:)
391:)
360:)
340:)
253:)
232:)
188:)
172:)
159:|
147:|
143:|
139:|
135:|
131:|
45::
1564:·
1558:·
1550:·
1543:·
1537:·
1531:·
1525:·
1520:(
1511:)
1508:)
1496:(
1493:)
1455:(
1420:(
1375:(
1360:(
1334:(
1317:(
1288:(
1268:☼
1257:)
1190:☼
1155:(
1138:(
1110:☼
1083:(
1075:(
1061:·
1055:·
1047:·
1040:·
1034:·
1028:·
1022:·
1017:(
1008:)
1005:)
993:(
990:)
952:(
917:(
871:)
867:(
843:(
810:(
778:(
764:(
744:(
731:(
714:(
695:(
680:(
660:(
643:(
621:☼
590:(
567:(
544:☼
490:(
429:(
411:(
383:(
376:P
356:(
336:(
249:(
224:(
217:P
184:(
168:(
166:)
163:)
155:(
151:)
127:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.