788:: Upon reading these opinions and discussing my article with other admins, I am in the process of rewriting the article in a manner more suited for the majority. I do however take offense to my article being labeled as "Spam". You may criticize me for my writing style or lack there of, but do not accuse me of pushing spam onto this site. I feel this is an article on a prominent figure in the fashion industry in South East Asia. While the subject of fashion might not be everyone's cup of tea per say, it is relevant to the goings on in an industry that generates billions of dollars globally. My desire to get this article online not only stems from the fact I believe the content to be valid, but I also want to be able to contribute to this site continually, and to do that successfully I want to learn the correct way to create an article.
1620:
German-style games that they would hardly be harmed or confused (or feel "repurposed") by the change of characterization of the category. The chance that anyone with the userbox lacks an "interest in German-style games" is effectively zero. So I don't see this as "repurposing", but as an inconsequential refocusing. And even that is only for those who added the userbox with BGG foremost in their thinking—as I've maintained, I think most people with the userbox had their interest in German-style games foremost in the first place, and were only incidentally concerned with the website. To the uninformed, the original characterization of the category ("For people who play German-style boardgames or frequent BoardGameGeek") is easily misinterpreted, since it hides the fact that the set of people who "frequent BoardGameGeek" is a
2298:) was speedily deleted under CSD G10, which covers attack pages and severe BLP problems. I understand the need for caution for biographies of living people, but I strongly suspect that G10 does not apply. When I last edited the article, it was not a hit job by an editor with an axe to grind. Instead, it was the biography of someone who has mainly been in the news for his misconduct. I think he is notable, based on sustained coverage in broadsheet media, but even if he wasn't, by itself it doesn't merit G10 - rather, an AfD or merging would be more appropriate. I'd discuss with the deleting admin, but the person is no longer contributing to wikipedia.
917:– Deletion endorsed. This is a bit convoluted, but the consensus below was pretty clear once I determined what the consensus was about. I'm convinced by the argument that BoardGameGeek is about the website (and even if it isn't, user categorization as a "BoardGameGeek" is dubious). The fact that a replacement "interested in" category is available along with accompanying userbox is also important. Given the variety of German style board games, an "interested in" category seems more useful than a "plays" category anyway. –
1689:(as I've tried to explain), but having fallen down the deletionist rabbit hole, I've tried my best to get back to reality (and have, of course, only become more disoriented in the process). In any case. I'll do my best to sort this out so that it does the least damage to the real people who are actually using the userbox to find each other and contribute game-related content. Please do delete the old category though, since nothing will point to it.
1165:
who have used it): to have a category (like the chess and mahjong players have) that identifies players of German style boardgame? do I really have to delete this one, unhook the userbox, build a new user box, define a new category (what would it be called, the name of this one is just right) and then have everyone who now uses this category edit their pages, or can't we just preserve the corrected version of the existing userbox and category?
1222:, and the template used to link to the category clearly states that it is for users who play those games. Whatever confusion there was about the purpose of the category in the past, it clearly serves a far less sinister purpose than you seem to accuse it of. What's the point of deleting it now? The whole thing will just have to be added back with a less accurate name in the future.
659:
Respectfully, I suggest a new deletion review at such time as a better article is created in user space, so there can be a discussion as to whether it now meets the bar. We should allow undeletion of the user space article so the editor can work on it. Keep the name salted in mainspace until a new DRV permits recreation of an article. Let's not have more out-of-process recreations.
543:
to do. Your userspace version got deleted because you blanked it and requested deletion after a cut-n-paste move. As far as daunting... I replied to your emails, didn't I? We are not too lazy to reply to you... your user talk page has evidence that several people have been telling you about the notability concerns with this article in all versions to date.
1593:, among other things, we presume that those who placed this userbox on their userpage ascribe to either or both criteria, and felt secure enough in that to place said userbox on their userpage. Now if someone comes along and "repurposes" a userbox, we run into the problem of the possiblility that the userbox may now
592:
I blanked my userspace version and requested deletion so I would not have an issue with the redirect. Was this an appropriate move on my part? Probably not, but I did not understand where and how the redirect issue came about, so as a novice editor here on Wiki I tried to rectify it with the limited
218:
I have done all that has been asked of me, added numerous sources from many different publications to satisfy any admin that has had an issue with it, Changed any redirect issue affiliated with the article etc. This has become a daily chore for something that should not be. If the article cannot be
2630:
case as to why those policies and guidelines should be cast aside in this case. A note to remember: Knowledge (XXG) is run by
Wikipedians, and the decisions are made the Knowledge (XXG) community, even if the community make those decisions based on outside influences. Free access to the sum total of
1264:
Is that true? I don't believe it is. In any case, the user box now also clearly states its correct purpose, and has had it's icon updated to call attention to the change, so any user who cares will delete it if they feel they have been miscategorized
Deleting the category is just nuts, because we'll
578:
Yes Jerry you did reply to my emails, and were helpful. I never once used the word lazy in any of my complaints. Lack of research, yes, and the repeat deletions for the same thing steer me to that conclusion. Especially when not one but two admins approved of the changes they requested, (Wmarch in
525:
To all the admins here, I know that to contact every writer of each article might be what you call daunting, but I feel issues such as this could have been rectified by someone messaging me by either wiki or email prior to the delete. As you have all witnessed I do respond rather quickly to resolve
1569:
why someone added the userbox to their user page. I'm ambivalent about what should be done with it. On the one hand, I generally don't favour repurposing in-use userboxes; on the other, your seemingly firm belief that use of the original userbox is tied to an interest in the subject of German-style
1164:
Wow, I still don't follow you. The category and user box have been fixed. What is your problem with it now? Or perhaps more to the point: what does one now have to do to get a userbox and category that does what I'm claiming this one does (which is really all that's of interest to me or most people
596:
Last, to address the notability issues that some admins might have had with this article, if one admin approves an article and others disagree on the notability issues, or feel it might need more wouldn't you think it would be fair that more detailed reasoning be given as to what amendments need to
542:
It is actually alot easier than you seem to think. Just put the article back to your userspace, improve it if it needs it, then come to DRV and request a review. If the result of the review is to mainspacify it, then you are home free. If not, you will receive good feedback on what more you need
186:
I am writing this in regards to the continuous deletes this article gets from numerous
Administrators. There seems to be a trend with this article where many of the admins do not read on the history of the article or the resolutions made with discrepancies in the past. I am neither messaged about
2384:
We have a BLP policy for several good reasons. Articles like this are one of them. I personally apply BLP very narrowly,but I would have unhesitatingly applied a G!0 under that policy for this article as it stands. This is the very model of an attack page, consisting almost entirely of unsourced
1619:
In the abstract, for two arbitrary criteria, this makes sense, but the truth of the matter is that the two criteria are not mutually exclusive: anyone whose interest in "affiliation" with the BGG website is strong enough to have inspired placing the userbox on his page is also interested enough in
1538:
OK, that makes sense. And that category name is the right one (and consistent with the parent). What's should I do with the old userbox though? It now points nowhere and (despite your assertions) most people who have it put it on their pages because they're "interested in German-style board games"
1011:
This category was misinterpreted as a "masquerade" for users of an external website, but is in fact a legitimate "users by interest" category. I've made changes to both the user box linking to this category, and the category itself to remove any confusion about its purpose. In it's current form, I
658:
The sequence of admin actions is confusing, but the latest deleted version of the page is still very unpromising. (It looks like a G11 speedy candidate to me, since it reads like an advertisement, has little or no exposition, and it just rattles off a bunch of credentials of unknown significance).
459:
I say that the problem was that when
Discospinster reviewed the article, if the determinations was made that it would likely pass an AfD, then Discospinster should have cross-namespace moved it, and made a comment in the edit summary to that effect, as well as making the usual talk page oldafdfull
1605:
bad idea. I agree with the others above: Revert the existing userbox to it's previous form (while removing the category per the discussion), and add the "re-created" category to the new userbox. As always, we should "err on the side of caution" when dealing with declaratives and categorisation of
810:
I can't see the article, but procedurally I'm worried that there was only one comment in the AfD. The article in the
Financial Times (certainly non-trivial) and the three or so in New Straits Times (one which looks non-trivial) seem to meet WP:N issues. In any case, I think this should have been
195:
the same issue. I contacted Jerry to inform him that this issue was rectified working with Pedro and he also informed me of a potential notability issue. I conveyed to him that this same issue was brought up in Nov 2007 and my changes were accepted by the admin at that time. He then allowed the
1332:
I'm not trying to get you to "give up", but rather to encourage an alternate way for seeking to preserve categorisation that minimises the potential for miscategorisation. I think that the problem was not with the category title, but rather the way it was populated. So, I think that the text of
302:
user space deletion - At the time I tagged the article, it had been rewritten but I felt did not significantly fix the problems it was originally sent to User space for. Namely, the article still read as more of a resumé than an encyclopedic article. I am not sure why the User space version was
200:
or I should say moved to my user sub page due to a notability issue. I worked with him to rectify the issues and over numerous discussions to make sure the sources were valid he allowed me to move the article back to the original name place. At 23:13 on March 17th I receive a speedy deletion
1671:
bad idea. Period. Just because someone may like a certain website, doesn't mean they may like a topic associated with that website. And I note that BGG deals with more than just "german-style board games". Anyway, all this aside, by attempting to change the original userbox, and so on, you've
1142:
clear that this is about playing board games at the website (note even the usage of the capitals witout spaces between the words), and has zero to do with collaborating on articles about board games. And if now, one were to change the text of the userbox, or the category header, it calls into
691:
The reason I moved it back in the first place was because I thought that notability had been established. I admit it was "borderline" but I felt it was leaning towards being an appropriate article. I see now that I probably should have brought it here in the first place, but we're here now,
1422:- Even if Jc37 had been completely wrong in the nominator's rationale, there is no reason for this category or any similar category to ever exist. It doesn't help Knowledge (XXG) to know "who plays" anything, and no such categories should be created or recreated. The deletion was sound.
209:
for a A7 violation. Upon questioning his reason for delete after providing him significant proof that the A7 violation was not valid in this case, He responded in a condescending manner. In just I responded accordingly. I then received another delete, and I am not sure why or how, by
615:: The user has brought up that certain admins have approved the article. That's not how it works. No admin has the authority to "approve" an article. Any comments that an admin might make to the user that an article has become "better" or meets with their approval is their
518:
Hi Jerry, Just to clarify, Wmarsh did approve of the additional sources that I added to the article and did allow the article to be created. From my recollection, I believe the "copy and paste" was an error on my part due to not understanding how to move a page over
345:: I agree with Jerry's assessment (below) that the user does not seem to have the facts straight. My observation is that the user has been disruptive with recreating an article that was deleted for good reasons. I believe it is a borderline notable autobiography and
2422:. Damir Dokić is a very controversial person, the epitome of the tennis dad. A lot of controversial things can be listed here. But that's all the more reason to be cautious. This article listed a lot of controversies, with very little sourcing. As such, it violated
1248:
The problem with just rewording the userbox is that it's likely to create miscategorisation. The people who added the userbox to their user page did so because of its content; now that the content has changed, the userbox may no longer apply to them.
2404:
Can someone email me the version that I edited (I think I wikified a Balkan newspaper) and the version that got deleted? I didn't recall it being an attack article at the time I edited it. I promise not to publish any BLP-violating content. Thanks,
684:
Jerry claims that I forgot to delete the redirect-to-a-user-page when I userfied the article on March 13. This is not entirely true; I placed a db-rediruser tag on the page (since I didn't become an admin until later that day, I couldn't delete it
370:
The requester does not seem to have the facts straight. The only times it was deleted "because of a redirect thing" was as a normal part of userfying the article. This is always done when a mainspace article is userfied. What really happened is
2362:
As said above the whole article reads throughout just as one negative statement after another and almost completly unsourced. Speedy deletion was the correct course of action in those circumstances. Would suggest just creating a redirect to
1522:
it is properly populated. A specific userbox for visiting a website should not populate such an interest category and, in general, the content of userboxes that are currently being used by many editors should not be dramatically changed.
1472:, what is acceptable or not is generally driven by consensus. So that is my opinion, not policy. As for the other board game categories being deleted, many have been deleted recently and I would agree with the deletion of the rest.
214:
for a G1: (Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible) violation. I have questioned him on this delete and he did respond and asked me kindly if I would like the article to be moved to my sandbox for further editing.
988:
1341:
discussed. In other words, rather than attempting to reverse the "delete" closure, I think it would be more efficient to attempt to get consensus for refocusing the scope of the category from one for visitors to
1664:
is appropriate for inclusion in that transcluded userbox. In addition (though really outside the scope of this discussion) that "repurposing/refocusing" a userbox which is transcluded on other's userpages is a
764:
in mainspace and userspace. This shows an obsessive desire to create an article on a subject which plainly does not meet our inclusion standards, and every iteration I've seen is plain old-fashioned spam.
187:
potential issues, by way of
Knowledge (XXG) or email which is active. I in turn get hasty deletes for issues that have already been remedied by previous admins. Case in Point, First deletion was made by
406:
merely deleted the resulting cross-namespace redirect, because
Discospinster accidentally left it there. The contents of the article were again subsequently inappropriately recreated in mainspace by a
1599:
apply to the user who affixed the box to their userpage. And considering that users are frequently not active or on
Wikibreak, or may just not have noticed the change, "re-purposing" a userbox is an
733:
My humble apologies, Discospinster... I was unaware that you made admin in the brief period between the page move and my review of the logs. I suppose I should walk by RFA every so often, eh?
1514:
1715:
People can find others using the userbox without having any category associated with it by simply using the "what links here" function on the left side of the page while at the userbox page.
1397:. Additionally, deletion will create confusion for users who are already members of the category, and will necessitate the creation of a new less accurate name for a replacement category.
1265:
have to make a new one to replace it, and what will we call it? Seriously, this is just a misunderstanding, it shouldn't result in the loss of a useful category of users.
640:
If an admin does not have administrative "approval" of an article, how can he or she delete an article then move it back to the mainspace once it meets their criteria?
438:; Group/band/club/company/etc; doesn't indicate importance/significance. The contents of the article were again subsequently inappropriately recreated in mainspace by a
2285:
2090:
Temporary Review: I request that this article be restored to my userspace so I can simply copy the content to my computer. I have no intentions to restart the article.
1901:
Temporary Review: I request that this article be restored to my userspace so I can simply copy the content to my computer. I have no intentions to restart the article.
2038:
2033:
2042:
450:; Patent nonsense, meaningless, or incomprehensible. (This was likely an error, as it was probably intended to be another G4 deletion.) JMLK17 also protected it.
387:
237:
177:
51:
37:
2470:
Nothing but unsourced negative material about a living person, no good version. Valid BLP deletion. It can be recreated from scratch withing the limits of BLP.
2067:
2025:
477:
and it should remain userfied and the author should be advised to continue to try to improve it, and take it up at DRV when it is ready. Until then, we should
1291:
I doubt that most people would notice a change to the wording of a single userbox, especially when many editors have dozens of such boxes on their user pages.
589:
Also, There has not been an article for deletion discussion about this article post 2007. All there have been is speedy deletes and discussions there after.
522:
Also in terms of notability, what more are you looking for? if needed I can email you the revised article with the additional resources for you to look over.
2640:
2636:
1002:
460:
with a comment about it being improved. Had that happened, we would probably not be here discussing it. We may well be at AfD2, but that's another story.
191:
for a redirect issue. I contacted Pedro immediately to rectify this. Once it was corrected the article was allowed to be active. Next deletion was by
46:
2081:
1438:
Now this is new logic (and not part of the original reasoning, as I understand it). If that's the case (and truly represents policy) then fine, but the
1218:- Currently the category is called "Wikipedias who play German-style board games", the category page clearly defines it as a group of users who play
971:
303:
deleted, especially as G1 was an improper reasoning. There are valid notability concerns, but I'm not sure that avenue has been exhausted yet, and
2667:
963:
473:
for a review. Having said that, I do not think the article has sufficient context for natability in V RS to support its N, so I think we should
2632:
2178:
speedy deletion as attack article, with no prejudice against recreation of an article on the subject which is neutral, balanced, and sourced. –
426:
unprotected it, stating that the author had added better references. The contents of the article were subsequently recreated in mainspace by a
1539:(not because of an affiliation with a website), so the correct thing to do (unless you think I'm lying) is to have that add the new category.
1130:
954:
913:
42:
2666:
The discussion on the Don Murphy deletion review has been moved to its own subpage as it was becoming too long for this page. Please see
1306:
OK, I give up. What do you suggest I call the new category for
Wikipedians who play German-style boardgames, once this one is deleted?
442:
method, (instead of moving, contrary to GFDL requirements), without a deletion review or administrator consultation. On 18 March 2008,
410:
method, (instead of moving, contrary to GFDL requirements), without a deletion review or administrator consultation. On 15 March 2008,
398:
method, (instead of moving, contrary to GFDL requirements), without a deletion review or administrator consultation. On 13 March 2008,
2242:
2237:
2246:
1892:
526:
any issue that might arouse. I feel the allowance of speedy deletion for numerous reasons has caused some to abuse that privilege.
1143:
question if this would then miscategorise
Wikipedians. Even if we were to accept the premise of the nominator above (that this is
688:
When I moved the article back to article space on March 15, it was a proper move and not a cut-and-paste move, as suggested above.
422:
as an apparent attempt by the author (this requester) to evade the protection. I protected that title as well. On 16 March 2008
1624:
of the people who "play German-style boardgames", so that the latter characterization (and the updated category) is correct for
851:
21:
2271:
2229:
1439:
1338:
134:
129:
2454:
of this version, no opinion on recreation with iron clad sourcing. Damir has recived a lot of media coverage over the years.
2117:
1928:
1095:
1047:
138:
1628:
in the old category. So it's clear to me that the correct thing to do is to have the old userbox point to the new category.
1151:
concern the website) should not populate this category. (Which, AFAICT, would leave the category empty - C1 speediable.) -
1701:
1660:
for the userbox to have a category attached. Those using the old userbox, still can. What we're discussing is whether the
1640:
1551:
1458:
1409:
1318:
1277:
1234:
1177:
1073:
1024:
163:
121:
2689:
2651:
2581:
2208:
2149:
2029:
2004:
1960:
1815:
1771:
937:
892:
100:
17:
2427:
1849:
1844:
1443:
2631:
all human knowledge, for all time and without bias, is our goal. Whatever the outcome, let's keep that goal in view.
2524:
entirely negative biography citing virtually no sources. Recreation is fine if the new version is sourced and NPOV.
1672:
essentially agreed with the premise of the original closure, so this DRV can probably be closed as "endorse" now. -
1853:
1756:, in which this discussion is somewhat continued. There is some information and some links which are noteworthy. -
597:
be made than just simply saying notability concerns? How is one able to fix an article where such vague feedback?
394:, at the user's request. The contents of the article were subsequently inappropriately recreated in mainspace by a
2021:
1981:
391:
1878:
1836:
1219:
1589:
criteria in place for the current userbox. German-style board games playing, and usage of the website. Due to
1347:
1117:
720:
264:
418:, recreation of content deleted at XfD, and Protected it. Also on 15 March 2008, Jerry (still me!) deleted
1570:
board games is having an effect. I think that, for now, I'll leave it to others' to comment on the issue.
922:
85:
847:
2350:
2679:
2570:
2557:(having redirected it). This article only has two versions: an unequivocal A7 and an unequivocal G10.
2549:
2532:
2516:
2499:
2482:
2462:
2446:
2437:
2414:
2396:
2376:
2354:
2333:
2307:
2197:
2136:
2122:
2099:
1993:
1947:
1933:
1910:
1804:
1760:
1724:
1706:
1676:
1645:
1610:
1576:
1556:
1529:
1505:
1481:
1463:
1431:
1414:
1385:
1356:
1323:
1297:
1282:
1255:
1239:
1210:
1198:
1182:
1155:
1100:
1078:
1052:
1029:
926:
879:
865:
838:
820:
801:
778:
752:
728:
668:
649:
634:
606:
562:
535:
503:
360:
335:
316:
290:
275:
255:
228:
89:
2471:
1494:
1334:
1058:
125:
2545:
664:
871:
830:
793:
641:
598:
527:
304:
220:
2511:
2233:
875:
834:
797:
645:
602:
531:
423:
224:
2342:
1840:
379:
2372:
2128:
2113:
2091:
1939:
1924:
1902:
1720:
1477:
1427:
1091:
1043:
705:
419:
399:
383:
197:
117:
76:
2321:
2317:
2458:
1697:
1636:
1572:
1547:
1525:
1454:
1405:
1352:
1314:
1293:
1273:
1251:
1230:
1173:
1069:
1020:
918:
860:
629:
355:
330:
250:
81:
1832:
1792:
479:
346:
2495:
2443:
2410:
2346:
2303:
2193:
2132:
2095:
1943:
1906:
1753:
1749:
748:
579:
2007 and discospinster as of recent). How could I have have the article active without it?
558:
499:
402:
re-userfied it, and stated that it was determined not to be a notable subject per the AfD.
272:
2423:
1590:
1469:
470:
469:
If Discospinster was not confident enough to do that, then it should have been deferred to
447:
435:
415:
2541:
2189:
1381:
1376:
There doesn't seem to be a reason to delete now that the boardgamegeek link has been cut.
816:
744:
660:
554:
495:
2364:
2295:
2278:
2074:
1885:
995:
170:
1061:
pointing to it has been "unhooked" from it, and the reason given is that this is a CfD.
1035:
Are you sure this is the cat you mean? It doesn't appear to have been deleted ever. --
2675:
2508:
2329:
2225:
2170:
583:
312:
286:
2367:
where any notability he has stems from and where he is already mentioned quite a bit.
2565:
2559:
2392:
2368:
2106:
1917:
1716:
1621:
1473:
1423:
1343:
1207:
1121:
1084:
1036:
773:
767:
697:
Anyway, after reading the rest of the comments I see that I jumped the gun, so I'll
2526:
2455:
1692:
1631:
1542:
1449:
1400:
1309:
1268:
1225:
1168:
1064:
1015:
855:
624:
431:
350:
325:
245:
206:
2263:
2059:
1870:
155:
870:
Comment: Thanks. Made the changes you requested. Please see above sandbox link.
2491:
2406:
2299:
1987:
1798:
443:
268:
211:
2507:, valid G10, but allow recreation of a neutral article with proper sourcing. --
2316:- If the article was primarily about the misconduct, then it is a violation of
582:
I cannot recreate the article in my userspace because a deletion has been done
219:
found for debate I can post it If allowed under my user sub page. Thank you.
2602:
2432:
2181:
2105:
Assuming that the e-mail you registered works, I believe that'd be easier. --
1916:
Assuming that the e-mail you registered works, I believe that'd be easier. --
1394:
1377:
812:
736:
674:
546:
487:
430:
method, (instead of moving, contrary to GFDL requirements). On 17 March 2008,
411:
403:
192:
188:
1147:
about the website), at the very least this specific userbox (which obviously
2671:
2325:
1757:
1673:
1607:
1195:
1152:
308:
282:
202:
827:
2387:
1493:
The AfD is clear, it does not look like there was any misinterpretation.
307:
deserves a chance to find more sources in his/her sandbox version. --
80:– Deletion endorsed. Allow recreation and improvement in userspace. –
201:
message for a G4 violation (which was rectified by Discospinster) by
1565:
I don't think that you're lying, but neither you nor I can really
1585:
It's simply a matter of accuracy. Essentially there are at least
826:
I have updated the article and would like feedback on it. Thanks
701:
without prejudice and also support keeping it on his userpage.
2341:- The article was primarily negative comments with no sources;
1337:
should be restored and the creation of a new category based on
677:'s first comment above, just to clarify some misunderstandings:
2614:
folks. Any editor may feel free to re-list this at AfD with a
1518:
1114:- I highly doubt I misinterpreted the category introduction:
1513:
per my and others' comments above, but permit recreation of
1515:
Category:Wikipedians interested in German-style board games
196:
article to be active. Then the article was deleted by
2259:
2255:
2251:
2055:
2051:
2047:
1866:
1862:
1858:
979:
975:
967:
959:
324:
article space deletion as one of the several deletors.
151:
147:
143:
955:
Category:Wikipedians who play German-style board games
914:
Category:Wikipedians_who_play_German-style_board_games
1654:
I think what you're missing here is that there is no
390:. On 12 November 2007 the same admin userfied it to
2618:rationale. Any new AfD rationale should refer to
1468:There is no policy on user categories other than
1083:Fixed the link to the UCfD. That might help. --
388:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Daniel Boey
238:Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/Daniel Boey
2426:, and deleting the article was justified imo.
1393:Per my comments above and in concurrence with
1346:to one for editors interested in the topic of
828:http://en.wikipedia.org/User:Succisa75/Sandbox
1687:completely disagree with the original premise
484:to prevent further cut-and-past recreations.
205:. 4 min later I had the article deleted by
8:
349:is in order to prevent further disruption.
2650:The following is an archived debate of the
2207:The following is an archived debate of the
2003:The following is an archived debate of the
1814:The following is an archived debate of the
936:The following is an archived debate of the
99:The following is an archived debate of the
2668:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review/Don Murphy
2595:
2163:
1974:
1785:
906:
414:(that's me!) deleted "Daniel Boey" citing
69:
41:
50:
2622:Knowledge (XXG) policy and guidelines
2294:The article on Damir Dokić (father of
1206:as closer per Jc's comments above. --
240:and closed without much discussion as
33:
1442:and all sub categories (for example,
7:
673:This is mainly a comment addressing
2692:of the page listed in the heading.
2584:of the page listed in the heading.
2152:of the page listed in the heading.
1963:of the page listed in the heading.
1774:of the page listed in the heading.
1752:, and particularly its subsection:
895:of the page listed in the heading.
852:Knowledge (XXG):Avoid peacock terms
2442:Endorse, negative and unsourced.--
28:
2633:Chase me ladies, I'm the Cavalry
2490:but certainly allow recreation.
619:approval and does not imply any
2688:The above is an archive of the
2580:The above is an archive of the
2148:The above is an archive of the
1959:The above is an archive of the
1770:The above is an archive of the
1754:User_talk:J_Greb#Ok.2C_found_it
891:The above is an archive of the
281:Fixed malformed DRV request --
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
811:relisted rather than deleted.
1:
30:
2022:The Lillian Verner Game Show
1982:The Lillian Verner Game Show
2540:per almost everyone above.
1012:believe it follows policy.
2715:
2680:08:54, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2641:01:35, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
2571:17:39, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
2550:20:05, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2533:07:47, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2517:06:57, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2500:00:49, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2483:00:17, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
2463:23:55, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2447:23:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2438:22:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2415:22:21, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2397:21:22, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2377:18:32, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2355:18:05, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2334:13:03, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2308:12:47, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2198:21:04, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
2137:02:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
2123:23:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
2100:22:07, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
1994:02:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1948:02:17, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
1934:23:38, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
1911:22:10, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
1805:02:45, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
1761:18:43, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
1725:01:10, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
1707:20:28, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1677:20:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1646:19:42, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1611:19:21, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1577:19:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1557:18:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1530:17:38, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1506:15:01, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1482:03:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1464:03:44, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1432:03:33, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1415:01:07, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1386:00:19, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
1357:18:52, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
1324:18:26, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
1298:18:01, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
1283:17:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
1256:17:32, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
1240:15:15, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1211:13:16, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1199:03:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1183:12:39, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1156:03:00, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1101:00:37, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
1079:23:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
1053:23:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
1030:22:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
927:02:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
880:00:37, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
866:18:36, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
839:18:27, 24 March 2008 (UTC)
821:03:04, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
802:19:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
779:14:27, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
753:17:14, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
729:14:04, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
669:04:38, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
650:19:45, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
635:13:25, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
607:05:14, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
563:04:06, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
536:03:08, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
504:23:40, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
392:User:Succisa75/Daniel Boey
361:00:09, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
336:22:37, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
317:22:31, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
291:22:26, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
276:04:28, 19 March 2008 (UTC)
256:22:48, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
229:21:28, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
90:02:54, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
1446:) should be deleted too.
1194:per my comments above. -
848:Knowledge (XXG):Footnotes
2695:Please do not modify it.
2670:if you wish to comment.
2657:Please do not modify it.
2587:Please do not modify it.
2214:Please do not modify it.
2155:Please do not modify it.
2010:Please do not modify it.
1966:Please do not modify it.
1821:Please do not modify it.
1777:Please do not modify it.
1348:German-style board games
1220:German-style board games
1126:- and the userbox text:
943:Please do not modify it.
898:Please do not modify it.
298:article space deletion,
236:: Article was listed at
106:Please do not modify it.
43:Deletion review archives
1444:Wikipedians who play go
1118:German-style boardgames
263:: Text can be found at
2654:of the article above.
2211:of the article above.
2007:of the article above.
1985:– Deletion endorsed –
1818:of the article above.
1796:– Deletion endorsed –
940:of the article above.
265:User:Succisa75/Sandbox
103:of the article above.
2385:negative statements.
1746:Notice for the closer
1116:"For people who play
1750:User_talk:J_Greb#3PO
1335:the original userbox
378:On 26 October 2007,
1748:- Please see also
446:deleted it citing
434:deleted it citing
400:User:Discospinster
198:User:Discospinster
2702:
2701:
2594:
2593:
2569:
2480:
2460:
2196:
2162:
2161:
2127:OK that's fine.--
2121:
1973:
1972:
1938:OK that's fine.--
1932:
1784:
1783:
1704:
1643:
1554:
1503:
1461:
1412:
1321:
1280:
1237:
1180:
1099:
1076:
1051:
1027:
905:
904:
864:
777:
751:
656:Endorse deletion.
633:
593:know how I had.
561:
502:
436:WP:CSD#A7 (group)
359:
334:
254:
60:
59:
2706:
2697:
2659:
2596:
2589:
2563:
2538:Endorse deletion
2522:Endorse deletion
2514:
2505:Endorse deletion
2488:Endorse deletion
2478:
2472:
2468:Endorse deletion
2459:
2452:Endorse deletion
2435:
2430:
2420:Endorse deletion
2360:Endorse deletion
2339:Endorse deletion
2281:
2267:
2249:
2216:
2188:
2187:
2184:
2164:
2157:
2111:
2077:
2063:
2045:
2012:
1990:
1975:
1968:
1922:
1888:
1874:
1856:
1823:
1801:
1786:
1779:
1705:
1696:
1644:
1635:
1555:
1546:
1511:Endorse deletion
1501:
1495:
1491:Endorse deletion
1462:
1453:
1413:
1404:
1322:
1313:
1281:
1272:
1238:
1229:
1181:
1172:
1128:"This user is a
1089:
1077:
1068:
1041:
1028:
1019:
998:
984:
983:
945:
907:
900:
858:
771:
762:Endorse deletion
743:
742:
739:
724:
717:
710:
704:
699:endorse deletion
627:
553:
552:
549:
494:
493:
490:
475:endorse deletion
353:
328:
248:
173:
159:
141:
108:
70:
56:
36:
31:
2714:
2713:
2709:
2708:
2707:
2705:
2704:
2703:
2693:
2690:deletion review
2655:
2652:deletion review
2585:
2582:deletion review
2512:
2479:
2474:
2433:
2428:
2290:
2284:
2277:
2276:
2270:
2240:
2224:
2212:
2209:deletion review
2182:
2179:
2153:
2150:deletion review
2086:
2080:
2073:
2072:
2066:
2036:
2020:
2008:
2005:deletion review
1988:
1964:
1961:deletion review
1897:
1891:
1884:
1883:
1877:
1847:
1831:
1819:
1816:deletion review
1799:
1775:
1772:deletion review
1690:
1629:
1606:Wikipedians. -
1540:
1502:
1497:
1447:
1440:parent category
1398:
1339:the new userbox
1307:
1266:
1223:
1166:
1062:
1013:
1007:
1001:
994:
993:
987:
957:
953:
941:
938:deletion review
896:
893:deletion review
737:
734:
727:
722:
711:
706:
702:
547:
544:
488:
485:
182:
176:
169:
168:
162:
132:
116:
104:
101:deletion review
68:
61:
54:
34:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
2712:
2710:
2700:
2699:
2684:
2683:
2662:
2661:
2646:
2645:
2644:
2643:
2592:
2591:
2576:
2575:
2574:
2573:
2552:
2535:
2519:
2502:
2485:
2473:
2465:
2449:
2440:
2417:
2399:
2379:
2357:
2336:
2292:
2291:
2288:
2282:
2274:
2268:
2219:
2218:
2203:
2202:
2201:
2200:
2160:
2159:
2144:
2143:
2142:
2141:
2140:
2139:
2088:
2087:
2084:
2078:
2070:
2064:
2015:
2014:
1999:
1998:
1997:
1996:
1971:
1970:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1899:
1898:
1895:
1889:
1881:
1875:
1826:
1825:
1810:
1809:
1808:
1807:
1782:
1781:
1766:
1765:
1764:
1763:
1742:
1741:
1740:
1739:
1738:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1728:
1727:
1710:
1709:
1680:
1679:
1649:
1648:
1614:
1613:
1580:
1579:
1560:
1559:
1533:
1532:
1508:
1496:
1487:
1486:
1485:
1484:
1435:
1434:
1417:
1388:
1370:
1369:
1368:
1367:
1366:
1365:
1364:
1363:
1362:
1361:
1360:
1359:
1327:
1326:
1301:
1300:
1286:
1285:
1259:
1258:
1243:
1242:
1213:
1201:
1188:
1187:
1186:
1185:
1159:
1158:
1108:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1103:
1009:
1008:
1005:
999:
991:
985:
948:
947:
932:
931:
930:
929:
903:
902:
887:
886:
885:
884:
883:
882:
868:
846:Comments: See
824:
823:
790:
789:
782:
781:
758:
757:
756:
755:
719:
695:
694:
693:
689:
686:
679:
678:
671:
638:
637:
621:administrative
584:User:MZMcBride
576:
575:
574:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
567:
566:
565:
523:
520:
509:
508:
507:
506:
464:
463:
462:
461:
454:
453:
452:
451:
373:
372:
364:
363:
339:
338:
319:
293:
184:
183:
180:
174:
166:
160:
111:
110:
95:
94:
93:
92:
67:
62:
58:
57:
49:
40:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2711:
2698:
2696:
2691:
2686:
2685:
2682:
2681:
2677:
2673:
2669:
2664:
2663:
2660:
2658:
2653:
2648:
2647:
2642:
2638:
2634:
2629:
2625:
2621:
2617:
2613:
2609:
2605:
2604:
2600:
2599:
2598:
2597:
2590:
2588:
2583:
2578:
2577:
2572:
2567:
2562:
2561:
2556:
2553:
2551:
2547:
2543:
2539:
2536:
2534:
2531:
2530:
2529:
2523:
2520:
2518:
2515:
2510:
2506:
2503:
2501:
2497:
2493:
2489:
2486:
2484:
2481:
2477:
2469:
2466:
2464:
2461:
2457:
2453:
2450:
2448:
2445:
2441:
2439:
2436:
2431:
2425:
2421:
2418:
2416:
2412:
2408:
2403:
2400:
2398:
2394:
2390:
2389:
2383:
2380:
2378:
2374:
2370:
2366:
2361:
2358:
2356:
2352:
2348:
2344:
2340:
2337:
2335:
2331:
2327:
2323:
2319:
2315:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2309:
2305:
2301:
2297:
2287:
2280:
2273:
2265:
2261:
2257:
2253:
2248:
2244:
2239:
2235:
2231:
2227:
2223:
2222:
2221:
2220:
2217:
2215:
2210:
2205:
2204:
2199:
2195:
2191:
2186:
2185:
2177:
2173:
2172:
2168:
2167:
2166:
2165:
2158:
2156:
2151:
2146:
2145:
2138:
2134:
2130:
2126:
2125:
2124:
2119:
2115:
2110:
2109:
2104:
2103:
2102:
2101:
2097:
2093:
2083:
2076:
2069:
2061:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2044:
2040:
2035:
2031:
2027:
2023:
2019:
2018:
2017:
2016:
2013:
2011:
2006:
2001:
2000:
1995:
1992:
1991:
1984:
1983:
1979:
1978:
1977:
1976:
1969:
1967:
1962:
1957:
1956:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1937:
1936:
1935:
1930:
1926:
1921:
1920:
1915:
1914:
1913:
1912:
1908:
1904:
1894:
1887:
1880:
1872:
1868:
1864:
1860:
1855:
1851:
1846:
1842:
1838:
1834:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1827:
1824:
1822:
1817:
1812:
1811:
1806:
1803:
1802:
1795:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1780:
1778:
1773:
1768:
1767:
1762:
1759:
1755:
1751:
1747:
1744:
1743:
1726:
1722:
1718:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1708:
1703:
1699:
1694:
1688:
1684:
1683:
1682:
1681:
1678:
1675:
1670:
1669:
1663:
1659:
1658:
1653:
1652:
1651:
1650:
1647:
1642:
1638:
1633:
1627:
1623:
1622:strict subset
1618:
1617:
1616:
1615:
1612:
1609:
1604:
1603:
1598:
1597:
1592:
1588:
1584:
1583:
1582:
1581:
1578:
1575:
1574:
1568:
1564:
1563:
1562:
1561:
1558:
1553:
1549:
1544:
1537:
1536:
1535:
1534:
1531:
1528:
1527:
1521:
1520:
1516:
1512:
1509:
1507:
1504:
1500:
1492:
1489:
1488:
1483:
1479:
1475:
1471:
1467:
1466:
1465:
1460:
1456:
1451:
1445:
1441:
1437:
1436:
1433:
1429:
1425:
1421:
1418:
1416:
1411:
1407:
1402:
1396:
1392:
1389:
1387:
1383:
1379:
1375:
1372:
1371:
1358:
1355:
1354:
1349:
1345:
1344:BoardGameGeek
1340:
1336:
1331:
1330:
1329:
1328:
1325:
1320:
1316:
1311:
1305:
1304:
1303:
1302:
1299:
1296:
1295:
1290:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1284:
1279:
1275:
1270:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1260:
1257:
1254:
1253:
1247:
1246:
1245:
1244:
1241:
1236:
1232:
1227:
1221:
1217:
1214:
1212:
1209:
1205:
1202:
1200:
1197:
1193:
1190:
1189:
1184:
1179:
1175:
1170:
1163:
1162:
1161:
1160:
1157:
1154:
1150:
1146:
1141:
1140:
1135:
1133:
1132:
1131:BoardGameGeek
1125:
1123:
1122:BoardGameGeek
1119:
1113:
1110:
1109:
1102:
1097:
1093:
1088:
1087:
1082:
1081:
1080:
1075:
1071:
1066:
1060:
1056:
1055:
1054:
1049:
1045:
1040:
1039:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1031:
1026:
1022:
1017:
1004:
997:
990:
981:
977:
973:
969:
965:
961:
956:
952:
951:
950:
949:
946:
944:
939:
934:
933:
928:
924:
920:
916:
915:
911:
910:
909:
908:
901:
899:
894:
889:
888:
881:
877:
873:
869:
867:
862:
857:
853:
849:
845:
844:
843:
842:
841:
840:
836:
832:
829:
822:
818:
814:
809:
808:Weak overturn
806:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
787:
784:
783:
780:
775:
770:
769:
763:
760:
759:
754:
750:
746:
741:
740:
732:
731:
730:
726:
725:
718:
716:
715:
709:
700:
696:
690:
687:
683:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
670:
666:
662:
657:
654:
653:
652:
651:
647:
643:
636:
631:
626:
622:
618:
614:
611:
610:
609:
608:
604:
600:
594:
590:
587:
585:
580:
564:
560:
556:
551:
550:
541:
540:
539:
538:
537:
533:
529:
524:
521:
517:
516:
515:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
505:
501:
497:
492:
491:
483:
481:
476:
472:
468:
467:
466:
465:
458:
457:
456:
455:
449:
445:
441:
440:cut-and-paste
437:
433:
429:
428:cut-and-paste
425:
424:Discospinster
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:cut-and-paste
405:
401:
397:
396:cut-and-paste
393:
389:
385:
381:
377:
376:
375:
374:
369:
366:
365:
362:
357:
352:
348:
344:
341:
340:
337:
332:
327:
323:
320:
318:
314:
310:
306:
301:
297:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
279:
278:
277:
274:
270:
266:
262:
258:
257:
252:
247:
243:
239:
235:
231:
230:
226:
222:
216:
213:
208:
204:
199:
194:
193:User:Jerryfor
190:
179:
172:
165:
157:
153:
149:
145:
140:
136:
131:
127:
123:
119:
115:
114:
113:
112:
109:
107:
102:
97:
96:
91:
87:
83:
79:
78:
74:
73:
72:
71:
66:
65:18 March 2008
63:
53:
48:
44:
39:
32:
23:
19:
2694:
2687:
2665:
2656:
2649:
2627:
2623:
2619:
2615:
2611:
2607:
2601:
2586:
2579:
2558:
2554:
2537:
2527:
2525:
2521:
2504:
2487:
2475:
2467:
2451:
2419:
2401:
2386:
2381:
2365:Jelena Dokić
2359:
2338:
2313:
2296:Jelena Dokić
2293:
2213:
2206:
2180:
2175:
2169:
2154:
2147:
2107:
2089:
2009:
2002:
1986:
1980:
1965:
1958:
1918:
1900:
1820:
1813:
1797:
1791:
1776:
1769:
1745:
1686:
1667:
1666:
1661:
1656:
1655:
1625:
1601:
1600:
1595:
1594:
1586:
1573:Black Falcon
1571:
1566:
1526:Black Falcon
1524:
1517:
1510:
1498:
1490:
1419:
1390:
1373:
1353:Black Falcon
1351:
1294:Black Falcon
1292:
1252:Black Falcon
1250:
1215:
1203:
1191:
1148:
1144:
1138:
1137:
1129:
1127:
1120:or frequent
1115:
1111:
1085:
1037:
1010:
942:
935:
919:IronGargoyle
912:
897:
890:
825:
807:
791:
785:
766:
761:
735:
721:
713:
712:
707:
698:
655:
639:
620:
616:
612:
595:
591:
588:
581:
577:
545:
486:
478:
474:
439:
432:User:Toddst1
427:
407:
395:
380:User:W.marsh
367:
342:
321:
299:
295:
260:
259:
241:
233:
232:
217:
207:User:Toddst1
185:
105:
98:
82:IronGargoyle
75:
64:
2347:Marasmusine
2226:Damir Dokić
2171:Damir Dokić
792:Thank you.
444:User:Jmlk17
420:Daniel boey
384:Daniel Boey
212:User:Jmlk17
118:Daniel Boey
77:Daniel Boey
2628:compelling
2626:provide a
2616:reasonable
2603:Don Murphy
2542:EdJohnston
2343:speedy G10
2194:count/logs
1685:LOL. No I
1602:incredibly
749:count/logs
675:User:Jerry
661:EdJohnston
623:approval.
559:count/logs
519:correctly.
500:count/logs
412:User:Jerry
404:User:Pedro
189:User:Pedro
47:2008 March
2345:applies.
872:Succisa75
831:Succisa75
794:Succisa75
642:Succisa75
599:Succisa75
528:Succisa75
448:WP:CSD#G1
416:WP:CSD#G4
305:Succisa75
221:Succisa75
203:User:Kesh
2620:specific
2612:Honestly
2608:Overturn
2476:(1 == 2)
2369:Davewild
2322:WP:UNDUE
2318:WP:BLP1E
2118:Contribs
2108:lifebaka
1929:Contribs
1919:lifebaka
1717:VegaDark
1662:category
1626:everyone
1499:(1 == 2)
1474:VegaDark
1424:VegaDark
1391:Overturn
1374:Overturn
1208:Kbdank71
1096:Contribs
1086:lifebaka
1059:user box
1048:Contribs
1038:lifebaka
714:spinster
685:myself).
617:personal
482:the page
382:deleted
300:Overturn
52:March 19
38:March 17
20: |
2555:Endorse
2528:Hut 8.5
2456:Viridae
2402:Comment
2382:Endorse
2314:Comment
2272:restore
2243:protect
2238:history
2176:Endorse
2068:restore
2039:protect
2034:history
1879:restore
1850:protect
1845:history
1833:Spishak
1793:Spishak
1693:Aldaron
1632:Aldaron
1543:Aldaron
1450:Aldaron
1420:Endorse
1401:Aldaron
1310:Aldaron
1269:Aldaron
1226:Aldaron
1216:Comment
1204:Endorse
1192:Endorse
1169:Aldaron
1112:Comment
1065:Aldaron
1057:It the
1016:Aldaron
989:restore
968:history
856:Toddst1
786:Comment
625:Toddst1
613:Comment
480:WP:SALT
368:Comment
351:Toddst1
347:WP:SALT
343:Comment
326:Toddst1
322:Endorse
296:Endorse
261:Comment
246:Toddst1
234:Comment
164:restore
135:protect
130:history
2492:Daniel
2424:WP:BLP
2407:Andjam
2300:Andjam
2247:delete
2129:UrPQ31
2092:UrPQ31
2043:delete
1989:Kurykh
1940:UrPQ31
1903:UrPQ31
1854:delete
1800:Kurykh
1668:really
1591:WP:AGF
1470:WP:NOT
471:WP:DRV
371:below:
269:Calton
242:Delete
139:delete
2566:Help!
2513:desat
2324:. --
2279:cache
2264:views
2256:watch
2252:links
2183:Jerry
2075:cache
2060:views
2052:watch
2048:links
1886:cache
1871:views
1863:watch
1859:links
1395:Hobit
1378:Hobit
1136:It's
996:cache
976:watch
972:links
813:Hobit
774:Help!
738:Jerry
708:disco
692:so...
548:Jerry
489:Jerry
386:per
171:cache
156:views
148:watch
144:links
55:: -->
16:<
2676:talk
2672:Nick
2637:talk
2546:talk
2509:Core
2496:talk
2434:ecis
2411:talk
2393:talk
2373:talk
2351:talk
2330:talk
2326:Kesh
2320:and
2304:talk
2260:logs
2234:talk
2230:edit
2190:talk
2133:talk
2114:Talk
2096:talk
2056:logs
2030:talk
2026:edit
1944:talk
1925:Talk
1907:talk
1867:logs
1841:talk
1837:edit
1758:jc37
1721:talk
1674:jc37
1657:need
1608:jc37
1567:know
1478:talk
1428:talk
1382:talk
1350:. –
1196:jc37
1153:jc37
1149:does
1139:very
1092:Talk
1044:Talk
1003:UCfD
980:logs
964:talk
960:edit
923:talk
876:talk
861:talk
850:and
835:talk
817:talk
798:talk
745:talk
723:talk
665:talk
646:talk
630:talk
603:talk
586:.
555:talk
532:talk
496:talk
356:talk
331:talk
313:talk
309:Kesh
287:talk
283:Kesh
273:Talk
251:talk
225:talk
152:logs
126:talk
122:edit
86:talk
35:<
2560:Guy
2444:Doc
2388:DGG
2286:AfD
2082:AfD
1893:AfD
1596:not
1587:two
1519:iff
1145:not
768:Guy
703:...
178:AfD
22:Log
2678:)
2639:)
2624:or
2610::
2606:–
2548:)
2498:)
2413:)
2395:)
2375:)
2353:)
2332:)
2306:)
2262:|
2258:|
2254:|
2250:|
2245:|
2241:|
2236:|
2232:|
2192:¤
2174:–
2135:)
2116:-
2098:)
2058:|
2054:|
2050:|
2046:|
2041:|
2037:|
2032:|
2028:|
1946:)
1927:-
1909:)
1869:|
1865:|
1861:|
1857:|
1852:|
1848:|
1843:|
1839:|
1723:)
1695:•
1691:—
1634:•
1630:—
1545:•
1541:—
1480:)
1452:•
1448:—
1430:)
1403:•
1399:—
1384:)
1312:•
1308:—
1271:•
1267:—
1228:•
1224:—
1171:•
1167:—
1134:."
1124:."
1094:-
1067:•
1063:—
1046:-
1018:•
1014:—
978:|
974:|
970:|
966:|
962:|
925:)
878:)
854:.
837:)
819:)
800:)
747:¤
667:)
648:)
605:)
557:¤
534:)
498:¤
315:)
289:)
271:|
267:--
244:.
227:)
154:|
150:|
146:|
142:|
137:|
133:|
128:|
124:|
88:)
45::
2674:(
2635:(
2568:)
2564:(
2544:(
2494:(
2429:A
2409:(
2391:(
2371:(
2349:(
2328:(
2302:(
2289:)
2283:|
2275:|
2269:(
2266:)
2228:(
2131:(
2120:)
2112:(
2094:(
2085:)
2079:|
2071:|
2065:(
2062:)
2024:(
1942:(
1931:)
1923:(
1905:(
1896:)
1890:|
1882:|
1876:(
1873:)
1835:(
1719:(
1702:C
1700:/
1698:T
1641:C
1639:/
1637:T
1552:C
1550:/
1548:T
1476:(
1459:C
1457:/
1455:T
1426:(
1410:C
1408:/
1406:T
1380:(
1319:C
1317:/
1315:T
1278:C
1276:/
1274:T
1235:C
1233:/
1231:T
1178:C
1176:/
1174:T
1098:)
1090:(
1074:C
1072:/
1070:T
1050:)
1042:(
1025:C
1023:/
1021:T
1006:)
1000:|
992:|
986:(
982:)
958:(
921:(
874:(
863:)
859:(
833:(
815:(
796:(
776:)
772:(
663:(
644:(
632:)
628:(
601:(
530:(
358:)
354:(
333:)
329:(
311:(
285:(
253:)
249:(
223:(
181:)
175:|
167:|
161:(
158:)
120:(
84:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.