228:
is a message which describes some basic terms regarding licensing of the work, that is the work is released under two different "free" licenses. This generally means it has to be your own work, or the person who holds the copyright has released it under a compatible license. Also remember that wikipedia is and encyclopedia and written from a
227:
it looks to me that Nancy has tried to explain the problem to you in a reasonable amount of detail. Updating the band members name is not the issue, you can't post the AllMusic Guide article since it is under someone elses copyright. When you post material to wikipedia, immediately below the edit box
286:
The version that was deleted was a genuine copyvio issue. It does appear that a complying article can be written on the subject and that some assistance offered to this new editor would be helpful in creating an article without any copyright problems. It may be best to recreate the article in
232:. You state that it's a review by a friend of the subject. This immediately suggests two problems to me. (1) Being an encyclopedia we don't publish reviews (2) Being a friend suggests there could be some problems with the reliability and neutrality of the review. --
186:
Since then, I have spoken with several more Wiki-knowledgeable friends, who explained that I should have simply posted the AllMusic article, waited for it to be approved, then gone back in and updated the band members names.
167:
I posted her All Music Guide review, written by Larry
Belanger, who is a friend of Lisa's and a staunch Cajun/Zydeco music supporter. Before posting, I studied as many of the 'Knowledge rules' as I could about how to submit.
174:
Because Larry also included info about Lisa's past band members (10-year-old information,) I updated the info before submitting, to reflect the current band members.
48:
34:
180:
Nancy accused me of committing "flagrant copyright violation," by updating the band members' names! I of course was shocked to be accused of anything illegal.
205:
I'd like to: simply start over. Post the AllMusic Guide article by Larry
Belanger, wait for it to be approved, then go in and update the band members' names.
43:
250:
and it appears you have posted two messages on Nancy's talk page and both have been responded to, the latest being the response I linked to above. --
199:
This is all a simple misunderstanding of the "say it in your own words" guideline. I have apologized to Nancy five times. I get no answer.
39:
247:
139:
287:
userspace and get some feedback from more experienced editors before considering moving a rewritten article back to mainspace.
251:
233:
193:
All Lisa's contemporaries have
Knowledge pages. Most of them are written by their wives!! And not a published article at all.
21:
164:
Dear
Knowledge and Jimmy Wales: On July 2, 2008, I posted a page on the subject of GRAMMY Nominated musician Lisa Haley.
154:
74:– We don't restore copyvios but there is clearly no bar on creating a new artice in your own words from scratch. –
307:
89:
17:
296:
278:
259:
241:
217:
78:
224:
213:
209:
255:
237:
171:
One guideline states "say it in your own words" but others say "must be from a published source."
292:
183:
She would not reply to any of my letters of apology, as if I were some kind of willful criminal.
274:
109:
229:
190:
I have tried five times to re-submit Lisa's All Music article. Each time I am blocked.
288:
269:, copyvio is a copyvio is a copyvio. We can't have copyright violations on the site.
177:
The next day, I was mortified to receive a note on my post from someone named Nancy.
75:
270:
196:
Meanwhile we languish as villains for simply wanting our info to be accurate.
105:
70:
146:
132:
124:
116:
8:
88:The following is an archived debate of the
63:
7:
310:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
306:The above is an archive of the
1:
297:16:17, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
279:09:13, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
260:22:09, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
242:22:06, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
218:21:13, 22 November 2010 (UTC)
208:Kindest Regards, Andy Anders
79:02:54, 25 November 2010 (UTC)
333:
223:Looking at your talk page
284:Endorse, allow recreation
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
313:Please do not modify it.
202:Can you please help me?
95:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
246:I've also checked your
230:neutral point of view
92:of the page above.
320:
319:
324:
315:
159:
157:
149:
135:
127:
119:
97:
64:
59:22 November 2010
53:
49:2010 November 23
35:2010 November 21
33:
332:
331:
327:
326:
325:
323:
322:
321:
311:
308:deletion review
153:
151:
145:
144:
138:
131:
130:
123:
122:
115:
114:
93:
90:deletion review
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
330:
328:
318:
317:
302:
301:
300:
299:
281:
264:
263:
262:
161:
160:
142:
136:
128:
120:
112:
100:
99:
84:
83:
82:
81:
61:
56:
47:
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
329:
316:
314:
309:
304:
303:
298:
294:
290:
285:
282:
280:
276:
272:
268:
265:
261:
257:
253:
249:
248:contributions
245:
244:
243:
239:
235:
231:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
215:
211:
206:
203:
200:
197:
194:
191:
188:
184:
181:
178:
175:
172:
169:
165:
156:
148:
141:
134:
126:
118:
111:
107:
104:
103:
102:
101:
98:
96:
91:
86:
85:
80:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
44:2010 November
41:
36:
23:
19:
312:
305:
283:
266:
207:
204:
201:
198:
195:
192:
189:
185:
182:
179:
176:
173:
170:
166:
162:
94:
87:
69:
58:
210:AndyAnders
106:Lisa Haley
71:Lisa Haley
252:82.7.40.7
234:82.7.40.7
289:Alansohn
20: |
267:Endorse
155:restore
125:history
76:Spartaz
271:Stifle
163:: -->
147:watch
140:links
52:: -->
16:<
293:talk
275:talk
256:talk
238:talk
225:here
214:talk
133:logs
117:edit
110:talk
32:<
22:Log
295:)
277:)
258:)
240:)
216:)
42::
291:(
273:(
254:(
236:(
212:(
158:)
152:(
150:)
143:|
137:|
129:|
121:|
113:|
108:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.