255:. There's more to the logo than mere characters, and the logo seems to be an original or unique work. (Note: I can't see the image, but I believe I have found it elsewhere on the internet, and of the three potential logos I looked at, did not see any which would be ineligible for copyright protection.)
580:
If I understand you, UK law, for example, accords copyright to images involving a (much) less degree of originality. But in this case, since the logo is US, it is only US law that counts even on
Commons. I happen to think the logo would more likely be kept at Commons than here. That has nothing to do
333:
If it were just circles cut out of the lettering, that might not be over the TOO, but it's ambiguous enough that I'd still prefer to write up a NFCC rationale than slap a public domain tag on it - it doesn't take a lot of creativity when combining typefaces and geometric shapes and 3-D elements to
78:
Opinion is divided as to whether this was a clear-cut case of copyvio. Normally, no consensus means that the closure is maintained, but our practice with speedy deletions is to submit them to further discussion where there is doubt about whether they were appropriate.
524:
original components than the logos in the category, e.g., the unique, stylized Disney font, the mouse ears silhouette, the red "i" with two yellow dots invoking Mickey Mouse's overalls). This file should be discussed at FFD rather than handled on a speedy basis.
191:, "typefaces and the characters they contain are considered to be utilitarian objects whose utility outweighs any merit that may exist in protecting their creative elements. As such, typefaces are exempt from copyright protection in the United States."
695:. CSD is for clear-cut cases, and since there's reasonable arguments on both sides, this obviously isn't a clear-cut case. The people who understand copyright law/policy hang out at FFD, so this should be sent there for their expert review. --
350:
this isn't just letters in a typeface, the artist has added holes and cracks to them in a way that's not part of the typeface. I strongly suspect this is over the threshold at which it qualifies for copyright protection. I also don't think
338:. This doesn't even come that close, though: the holes aren't circular, and the cracks around them are plainly copyrightable. Downscaling the image so that they're a bit blurry doesn't change that. Endorse. —
503:
674:
Likely to be deleted at FfD, but there is apparently serious debate here, so apparently it's not an appropriate speedy. By my understanding it is probably protected. But I'm no expert. So
438:
You are. But not a single person has come forth to support you or oppose the deletion, while a multitude have come forth to oppose you and endorse the deletion. Despite what you may
152:
48:
34:
171:
43:
631:, given the arrangement (and complexity) of the bullet holes. Wouldn't be opposed to restoring if a valid fair use case could be made. For reference:
187:
to be considered a non-free work. It's just words with a few holes in them, which is not original or unique enough to render it a non-free image. Per
628:
317:
269:
428:
381:
214:
202:
39:
546:
472:. Keep in mind that the recipient of your invective is another human being, who is volunteering their time, just like you. --
164:
21:
287:
containing just the "The
Suicide Squad" logo, from the bottom line of the full image, between the WB and DC logos. --
122:
516:
images, and it seems the
Suicide Squad logo has much less originality than any of the others in the category (whereas
184:
678:. To be clear, I think the person doing the speedy made a quite reasonable call. But worth discussing it seems.
118:
70:
730:
715:
102:
17:
719:
702:
687:
669:
650:
619:
598:
575:
558:
537:
479:
459:
433:
412:
386:
365:
342:
322:
309:
294:
274:
261:
241:
207:
188:
91:
517:
335:
499:
423:
376:
284:
197:
711:
699:
570:
532:
476:
304:
291:
256:
581:
with copyright law and a lot to do with the attitudes that have developed among the denizens of
545:
Commons seeks to conform to copyright both in the US and the source country. Its guidance is at
417:
Because I'm allowed to disagree with people who I think are incorrect. It's as simple as that.
640:
615:
594:
554:
452:
405:
234:
510:
418:
371:
192:
610:
because it was certainly wrong. I would upload the thing to
Commons rather than fuss here.
683:
469:
392:
82:
696:
665:
582:
566:
528:
473:
288:
710:
clearly to complex for public domain, especially with the cracks around the holes.
611:
590:
550:
446:
399:
358:
339:
300:
252:
228:
180:
502:, including the one under discussion (at the bottom center), and then I look at
586:
679:
395:
that it doesn't pass the free threshold. Why would this suddenly change? --
370:
Maybe that was a little harsh, but can't you see that this frustrates me?
660:
221:
355:
is an acceptable way to treat a volunteer who's just doing their job.
299:
Yep, that's the one I found. Thank you for confirming. I stand by the
224:; a typeface is a font family, not an entire logo with formatting. --
285:
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/EEXoL5OXYAITCs3?format=jpg&name=large
658:
Probably will bedeeted, but it should be discussed here, not here.
636:
492:(Is that a proper option? I'm still getting the hang of file DRVs.)
632:
391:
We can that it does, but we can't see why it does. You've been
215:
Knowledge:Requests for undeletion#File:TheSuicideSquadLogo.png
504:
Category:Public domain images ineligible for copyright (logo)
641:
283:
It looks like what was uploaded was a rectangular crop from
442:, it is clear that you are the only incorrect one here. --
498:
copyright violations; this one is ambiguous. I look at
352:
213:
For interested editors, see the original discussion at
159:
145:
137:
129:
183:) but I'm challenging it because it does not meet the
468:
Disagreement is fine, as long as it's respectful and
676:overturn speedy and anyone can list that wants to
8:
189:Knowledge:Public_domain#Fonts_and_typefaces
179:This was deleted as a copyright violation (
101:The following is an archived debate of the
217:, where the request was originally denied.
63:
549:. Here we only address US copyright.
7:
506:, which is the category filled with
733:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
547:commons:Threshold of originality
729:The above is an archive of the
720:12:20, 23 September 2019 (UTC)
703:18:51, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
688:03:36, 22 September 2019 (UTC)
670:00:57, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
651:20:47, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
620:17:41, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
599:17:29, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
576:14:16, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
559:13:48, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
538:03:53, 18 September 2019 (UTC)
480:12:32, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
460:11:58, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
434:11:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
413:10:49, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
387:10:43, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
366:06:51, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
343:02:21, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
334:become copyrightable; compare
323:00:27, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
295:00:24, 16 September 2019 (UTC)
275:23:42, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
242:15:39, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
208:15:11, 15 September 2019 (UTC)
92:07:25, 27 September 2019 (UTC)
1:
393:explained by multiple editors
119:File:TheSuicideSquadLogo.png
71:File:TheSuicideSquadLogo.png
251:Seems to be a pretty clear
220:Now, click on the link for
756:
18:Knowledge:Deletion review
736:Please do not modify it.
489:Overturn F9, list at FFD
185:threshold of originality
108:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
563:What's the difference?
518:File:Disney Junior.svg
336:File:Disney Junior.svg
520:looks to me to have
105:of the page above.
743:
742:
493:
426:
421:
379:
374:
200:
195:
90:
59:15 September 2019
49:2019 September 16
35:2019 September 14
747:
738:
648:
647:
644:
637:description page
574:
573:
536:
535:
515:
509:
491:
458:
449:
431:
424:
419:
411:
402:
384:
377:
372:
361:
320:
312:
272:
264:
240:
231:
205:
198:
193:
174:
162:
148:
140:
132:
110:
89:
87:
80:
64:
53:
33:
755:
754:
750:
749:
748:
746:
745:
744:
734:
731:deletion review
712:Graeme Bartlett
645:
642:
627:Likely exceeds
569:
564:
531:
526:
513:
507:
455:
447:
443:
429:
408:
400:
396:
382:
359:
316:
308:
268:
260:
237:
229:
225:
203:
170:
169:
158:
157:
151:
144:
143:
136:
135:
128:
127:
106:
103:deletion review
83:
81:
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
753:
751:
741:
740:
725:
724:
723:
722:
705:
690:
672:
653:
622:
605:
604:
603:
602:
601:
540:
486:
485:
484:
483:
482:
466:
465:
464:
463:
462:
453:
406:
345:
330:
329:
328:
327:
326:
325:
278:
277:
245:
244:
235:
218:
177:
176:
167:
155:
149:
141:
133:
125:
113:
112:
97:
96:
95:
94:
61:
56:
47:
44:2019 September
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
752:
739:
737:
732:
727:
726:
721:
717:
713:
709:
706:
704:
701:
698:
694:
691:
689:
685:
681:
677:
673:
671:
667:
663:
662:
657:
654:
652:
649:
638:
634:
633:original file
630:
629:TOO in the US
626:
623:
621:
617:
613:
609:
606:
600:
596:
592:
588:
584:
579:
578:
577:
572:
568:
562:
561:
560:
556:
552:
548:
544:
541:
539:
534:
530:
523:
519:
512:
505:
501:
497:
490:
487:
481:
478:
475:
471:
467:
461:
457:
456:
450:
441:
437:
436:
435:
432:
427:
422:
416:
415:
414:
410:
409:
403:
394:
390:
389:
388:
385:
380:
375:
369:
368:
367:
364:
363:
362:
354:
349:
346:
344:
341:
337:
332:
331:
324:
321:
319:
313:
311:
306:
305:SportingFlyer
302:
298:
297:
296:
293:
290:
286:
282:
281:
280:
279:
276:
273:
271:
265:
263:
258:
257:SportingFlyer
254:
250:
247:
246:
243:
239:
238:
232:
223:
219:
216:
212:
211:
210:
209:
206:
201:
196:
190:
186:
182:
173:
166:
161:
154:
147:
139:
131:
124:
120:
117:
116:
115:
114:
111:
109:
104:
99:
98:
93:
88:
86:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
735:
728:
707:
692:
675:
659:
655:
624:
607:
542:
521:
495:
488:
444:
439:
397:
357:
356:
347:
315:
307:
267:
259:
248:
226:
178:
107:
100:
84:
76:Sent to FFD.
75:
69:
58:
693:Send to FFD
656:List at FFD
608:Overturn F9
500:these logos
496:unambiguous
494:F9 is for
85:Sandstein
697:RoySmith
474:RoySmith
470:WP:CIVIL
289:RoySmith
222:typeface
20: |
708:Endorse
625:Endorse
612:Thincat
591:Thincat
551:Thincat
543:Comment
511:PD-logo
360:Hut 8.5
348:Endorse
340:Cryptic
249:Endorse
172:restore
165:article
138:history
700:(talk)
646:ASTILY
587:COM:DR
583:WP:FFD
477:(talk)
292:(talk)
680:Hobit
666:talk
567:Leviv
529:Leviv
440:think
301:WP:F9
253:WP:F9
181:WP:F9
160:watch
153:links
52:: -->
16:<
716:talk
684:talk
616:talk
595:talk
585:and
555:talk
522:more
448:Alex
401:Alex
353:this
230:Alex
146:logs
130:edit
123:talk
32:<
661:DGG
571:ich
533:ich
425:BRO
420:JOE
378:BRO
373:JOE
199:BRO
194:JOE
163:) (
22:Log
718:)
686:)
668:)
635:,
618:)
597:)
589:.
565:–
557:)
527:–
514:}}
508:{{
454:21
430:64
407:21
383:64
303:.
236:21
204:64
74:–
42::
714:(
682:(
664:(
643:F
639:-
614:(
593:(
553:(
451:/
445:/
404:/
398:/
318:C
314:·
310:T
270:C
266:·
262:T
233:/
227:/
175:)
168:|
156:|
150:|
142:|
134:|
126:|
121:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.