692:
arguments that this particular individual was not were far stronger. I'm persuaded by the argument that coverage of a custody battle is not SIGCOV for the child subject of that battle, though it may be for the parents. And while I didn't downweight !votes based on conduct, tossing around personal attacks isn't helping your case.
691:
Given the tone being employed here, I don't especially mind that this wasn't raised with me; I don't think that would have been terribly productive. I stand by my closure. Members of royal families who never ruled themselves are sometimes notable because of other activities, and sometimes not. The
555:
bullied by anti-monarchy gang, who trying to deleted many royalty articles since 2020. The princess was a daughter of a reigning monarch, and her life received extensive coverage from various sources, also notable enough for a biography to have be written about her "The
Struggle for a Royal Child,
711:
I agree with the closer that the
Redirect arguments were stronger. Since the arguments for redirection were that the subject has little coverage outside of the custody dispute, the most convincing way to undo the redirection would be to write an article or draft about her which has substantial
173:
This article was reviewed twice & there was no change. First nomination & no votes. Soft delete & article refunded. Second nomination 2 votes with Delete. Both nomination was addressed by same person (checked his edits which was below 100). I have read about notability, and all the
712:
coverage of the other parts of her life. It's true that she was the daughter of a reigning monarch, but the monarchy was abolished when she was still a child and it wasn't a monarchy of an independent country anyway, so it shouldn't be that surprising if she isn't notable.
398:, copy that. We can close this discussion as I have understood what needs to be done. Thank you very much all for clearing all my doubts. Let me invest more time so that I can contribute precisely & in constructive manner. Will introvert & investigate my learnings.
582:
close reasoning: AfDs are closed based on sources, policy, and guidelines. The only way this is no-consensus is by counting votes and hoping NOTINHERITED is ignored. Keep voters had a lot of assertions, but no sources and this article does not meet notability guidelines.
269:
refer to different things and both must be met. At this time, I would suggest that AfC review is a good idea. Continuing to familiarise oneself with the notability guidelines is also a good idea, andkI would suggest doing both, time permitting the second.
635:" isn't going to help your case here, nor is suggesting that there is an "anti-monarchy gang" conspiring to have articles deleted. Can you demonstrate here that "her life", and not just her parents' custody dispute, received "extensive coverage"? –
624:
260:
at an appropriate venue. (Number of edits also does not constitute sufficient evidence for anything) Second: Beyond reliable, coverage must also be significant, independent and secondary. An example of what might be excluded as
561:
156:
204:
is a non-sequitur - notability, especially for companies, has to do with far more than reliability. It may be time to accept that the the community has decided that this company should not have an article.
527:
174:
references were reliable. Still article got deleted. Am I missing with
Notability or we can make the article back to mainspace? Or shall I go through AfC review rather than directly publishing?
542:
376:- The title has not been salted, and the appellant is free to create another article, but it will almost certainly be taken to AFD. It is much better to submit a draft through AFC.
48:
34:
43:
256:. Two additional notes. First: Number of edits has naught to do with DRV. If the nominator believes that there be a specific conduct issue, it should be raised
497:
557:
493:
449:
144:
605:
Long time no see old friend, you r still shameful! Well, Subject of a book is Enough to pass WP:GNG. GNG rule is not created for a weapon.
606:
39:
644:
565:
165:
21:
279:
411:
360:
309:
240:
187:
564:. Unfair decision! Why not have an entry on Knowledge (XXG) because she was not a princess of a British monarch?. Thanks
266:
462:
733:
477:
428:
94:
17:
74:– Nominator does not wish to further pursue their appeal. A draft can be created and submitted in the normal way.
407:
381:
356:
330:
305:
236:
183:
648:
610:
722:
703:
686:
651:
614:
596:
573:
466:
458:
415:
385:
364:
334:
313:
283:
244:
214:
191:
83:
668:
664:
663:'s closing statement (you forgot to discuss this with him first, by the way) already said, failed because
640:
569:
114:
552:
698:
591:
395:
377:
344:
326:
110:
70:
275:
681:
671:
are very weak in the face of an actual policy- and source-based evaluation of notability. The
636:
403:
352:
301:
232:
179:
694:
660:
587:
209:
79:
325:
both closes, if they are being appealed. Both closes were closed the only possible way.
265:
would be funding announcements. As a general comment on notability, I will also add that
296:, Agreed with both the pointers addressed. Definitely, I will opt for AfC from now on.
293:
271:
715:
676:
399:
348:
297:
228:
175:
224:
206:
75:
672:
457:: requester is evading a block, with all other editors !voting endorse.
551:
Clearly a no consensus result but closure's decision is redirect, also
200:
The discussion was unanimous and could not have closed any other way
202:
I have read about notability, and all the references were reliable
227:, I will read about notability again, and respect the decision.
562:
wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Diane, Duchess of Württemberg
623:
Please tone it down a bit, anon. Calling other editors "
632:
628:
534:
520:
512:
504:
151:
137:
129:
121:
659:. You're just rehashing the keep arguments, which as
675:
sounds like a blast, though – where do I sign up? –
8:
476:The following is an archived debate of the
93:The following is an archived debate of the
442:
63:
201:
556:Anna Monica Pia, Duchess of Saxony",
7:
736:of the page listed in the heading.
494:Princess Anna of Saxony (1903–1976)
450:Princess Anna of Saxony (1903–1976)
431:of the page listed in the heading.
28:
732:The above is an archive of the
427:The above is an archive of the
18:Knowledge (XXG):Deletion review
723:17:22, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
704:15:23, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
687:13:14, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
652:09:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
615:09:25, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
597:09:05, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
574:08:38, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
560:. For example AfD outcome see
467:18:27, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
386:06:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
335:06:20, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
284:04:55, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
215:23:42, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
192:20:24, 20 September 2023 (UTC)
1:
633:shameless members of a gang
416:07:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
365:07:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
314:07:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
245:07:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
84:08:29, 4 October 2023 (UTC)
759:
374:Allow Submission of Draft
267:independent and secondary
739:Please do not modify it.
665:assertions of importance
483:Please do not modify it.
434:Please do not modify it.
100:Please do not modify it.
40:Deletion review archives
669:pleases of unfairness
558:ISBN: 9781332933518
263:significant coverage
480:of the page above.
97:of the page above.
673:anti-monarchy gang
459:Extraordinary Writ
746:
745:
685:
441:
440:
59:20 September 2023
49:2023 September 21
35:2023 September 19
750:
741:
718:
702:
679:
595:
547:
545:
537:
523:
515:
507:
485:
455:Procedural close
443:
436:
168:
163:
154:
140:
132:
124:
102:
64:
53:
33:
758:
757:
753:
752:
751:
749:
748:
747:
737:
734:deletion review
716:
693:
584:
541:
539:
533:
532:
526:
519:
518:
511:
510:
503:
502:
481:
478:deletion review
432:
429:deletion review
396:Robert McClenon
378:Robert McClenon
345:Robert McClenon
327:Robert McClenon
212:
211:it has begun...
164:
162:
159:
150:
149:
143:
136:
135:
128:
127:
120:
119:
111:Pidge (company)
98:
95:deletion review
71:Pidge (company)
62:
55:
54:
51:
46:
37:
31:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
756:
754:
744:
743:
728:
727:
726:
725:
706:
689:
654:
620:
619:
618:
617:
607:82.209.191.153
600:
599:
549:
548:
530:
524:
516:
508:
500:
488:
487:
472:
471:
470:
469:
439:
438:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
389:
388:
370:
369:
368:
367:
338:
337:
319:
318:
317:
316:
287:
286:
250:
249:
248:
247:
218:
217:
210:
171:
170:
160:
147:
141:
133:
125:
117:
105:
104:
89:
88:
87:
86:
61:
56:
47:
44:2023 September
38:
30:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
755:
742:
740:
735:
730:
729:
724:
721:
720:
719:
710:
707:
705:
700:
696:
690:
688:
683:
678:
674:
670:
666:
662:
658:
655:
653:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
630:
626:
622:
621:
616:
612:
608:
604:
603:
602:
601:
598:
594:
593:
589:
581:
578:
577:
576:
575:
571:
567:
563:
559:
554:
544:
536:
529:
522:
514:
506:
499:
495:
492:
491:
490:
489:
486:
484:
479:
474:
473:
468:
464:
460:
456:
452:
451:
447:
446:
445:
444:
437:
435:
430:
425:
424:
417:
413:
409:
405:
401:
397:
393:
392:
391:
390:
387:
383:
379:
375:
372:
371:
366:
362:
358:
354:
350:
346:
342:
341:
340:
339:
336:
332:
328:
324:
321:
320:
315:
311:
307:
303:
299:
295:
291:
290:
289:
288:
285:
281:
277:
273:
268:
264:
259:
258:with evidence
255:
252:
251:
246:
242:
238:
234:
230:
226:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
213:
208:
203:
199:
196:
195:
194:
193:
189:
185:
181:
177:
167:
158:
153:
146:
139:
131:
123:
116:
112:
109:
108:
107:
106:
103:
101:
96:
91:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:
68:
67:
66:
65:
60:
57:
50:
45:
41:
36:
23:
19:
738:
731:
714:
713:
708:
656:
637:filelakeshoe
585:
579:
566:62.181.221.7
553:WP:IDONTLIKE
550:
482:
475:
454:
448:
433:
426:
373:
322:
262:
257:
253:
197:
172:
99:
92:
69:
58:
661:Vanamonde93
629:disgusting
207:* Pppery *
695:Vanamonde
294:Alpha3031
272:Alpha3031
625:shameful
20: |
717:Hut 8.5
709:Endorse
657:Endorse
631:" and "
588:Timothy
580:Endorse
543:restore
513:history
412:Contrib
400:VKG1985
394:Thanks
361:Contrib
349:VKG1985
343:Thanks
323:Endorse
310:Contrib
298:VKG1985
292:Thanks
254:Endorse
241:Contrib
229:VKG1985
223:Thanks
198:Endorse
188:Contrib
176:VKG1985
166:restore
130:history
408:E-Mail
357:E-Mail
306:E-Mail
237:E-Mail
225:Pppery
184:E-Mail
76:Stifle
535:watch
528:links
152:watch
145:links
52:: -->
16:<
699:Talk
682:talk
667:and
627:", "
611:talk
592:talk
570:talk
521:logs
505:edit
498:talk
463:talk
404:Talk
382:talk
353:Talk
331:talk
302:Talk
261:not-
233:Talk
180:Talk
138:logs
122:edit
115:talk
80:talk
32:<
677:Joe
590:::
586://
157:XfD
155:) (
22:Log
649:🐱
647:)
643:/
613:)
572:)
465:)
453:–
414:)
410:|
406:|
384:)
363:)
359:|
355:|
347:.
333:)
312:)
308:|
304:|
282:)
278:•
243:)
239:|
235:|
190:)
186:|
182:|
82:)
42::
701:)
697:(
684:)
680:(
645:c
641:t
639:(
609:(
568:(
546:)
540:(
538:)
531:|
525:|
517:|
509:|
501:|
496:(
461:(
402:(
380:(
351:(
329:(
300:(
280:c
276:t
274:(
231:(
178:(
169:)
161:|
148:|
142:|
134:|
126:|
118:|
113:(
78:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.