229:
330:
236:
413:
337:
323:
222:
169:
215:
85:
The less formal nature of the third opinion process is a major advantage over other methods of resolving disputes. For more complex disputes that involve more than two editors, or that cannot be resolved through talk page discussion, editors should follow the other steps in the
101:
Some disputes may involve both content issues as well as issues regarding the conduct of an editor. In such cases, the third opinion request should be framed in terms of content issues, even if the conduct of an editor is also at issue. For disputes that are
75:) is a means to request an outside opinion in a dispute between two editors. When two editors do not agree, either editor may list a discussion here to seek a third opinion. The third opinion process requires observance of
427:
Apply to the
Arbitration Committee for an examination and binding decision regarding a long-standing issue of misconduct after all other avenues of dispute resolution have been exhausted.
344:
248:
420:
354:
374:
281:
349:
253:
91:
329:
322:
443:
17:
235:
453:
214:
221:
228:
268:
Ask questions and request assistance from users familiar with the content policies and guidelines relevant to that noticeboard.
177:
412:
367:
Request enforcement against a user who you feel is acting in breach of the remedies described in a closed arbitration case.
336:
157:
147:
87:
76:
364:
Request assistance from administrators and experienced editors regarding recent or ongoing misconduct by an editor.
106:
about an editor's conduct and are not related to a content issue, other forums may be more appropriate such as the
161:, and details the various different methods used at each of the Knowledge dispute resolution pages.
129:
27:
456:, for situations where an editor is suspected of abusively using two or more Knowledge accounts.
110:. If in doubt, post your request here at third opinion and a neutral editor will help out.
80:
274:
Have uninvolved volunteers facilitate a discussion about an ongoing content dispute.
258:
107:
95:
361:
Report editors who are repeatedly undoing others' edits to try to "win" a dispute.
271:
Request input on a specific content issue from a broad number of uninvolved users.
265:
Request an outside opinion when there is a content dispute between only two users.
120:
155:
provides a central compilation and easy-access overview of noticeboards for
181:
of the relevant article or user before requesting dispute resolution.
83:
from both editors during the discussion in order to be successful.
163:
137:
42:
35:
56:Please read before requesting for a third opinion
8:
446:, for situations where an editor is clearly
373:Unsure which one to use? Check out our
280:Unsure which one to use? Check out our
444:Help:Simple guide to vandalism cleanup
119:To request a Third Opinion, visit the
350:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents
18:Knowledge:Dispute resolution requests
7:
454:Knowledge:Sockpuppet investigations
123:and follow the instructions there.
24:
176:should be discussed first at the
411:
335:
328:
321:
234:
227:
220:
213:
167:
174:All content and conduct issues
168:
259:Dispute resolution noticeboard
92:dispute resolution noticeboard
1:
311:dispute resolution requests
203:dispute resolution requests
148:Knowledge:Dispute resolution
375:guide to dispute resolution
282:guide to dispute resolution
153:Dispute resolution requests
471:
377:, or ask at the talk page.
284:, or ask at the talk page.
145:
127:
108:administrators noticeboard
25:
450:trying to harm Knowledge.
410:
371:
334:
327:
320:
278:
233:
226:
219:
212:
345:Edit warring noticeboard
249:Specialised noticeboards
355:Arbitration Enforcement
121:Third Opinion Project
254:Requests for comment
90:process such as the
96:request for comment
158:dispute resolution
88:dispute resolution
435:
434:
431:
430:
421:Arbitration Cases
398:Advanced disputes
386:
385:
382:
381:
293:
292:
289:
288:
185:
184:
115:
114:
63:
62:
462:
415:
408:
407:
402:
401:
400:
391:
390:
339:
332:
325:
318:
317:
309:
308:
307:
298:
297:
238:
231:
224:
217:
210:
209:
201:
200:
199:
190:
189:
171:
170:
164:
140:
65:
64:
58:
51:
50:
45:
38:
470:
469:
465:
464:
463:
461:
460:
459:
440:
396:
395:
394:
378:
303:
302:
301:
285:
197:Article content
195:
194:
193:
150:
144:
143:
136:
132:
125:
54:
49:
48:
41:
34:
30:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
468:
466:
458:
457:
451:
439:
436:
433:
432:
429:
428:
424:
423:
417:
416:
404:
403:
388:
384:
383:
380:
379:
372:
369:
368:
365:
362:
358:
357:
352:
347:
341:
340:
333:
326:
314:
313:
295:
291:
290:
287:
286:
279:
276:
275:
272:
269:
266:
262:
261:
256:
251:
246:
240:
239:
232:
225:
218:
206:
205:
187:
183:
182:
172:
142:
141:
133:
128:
117:
113:
112:
61:
60:
59:
47:
46:
39:
31:
26:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
467:
455:
452:
449:
445:
442:
441:
437:
426:
425:
422:
419:
418:
414:
409:
406:
405:
399:
393:
392:
389:
376:
370:
366:
363:
360:
359:
356:
353:
351:
348:
346:
343:
342:
338:
331:
324:
319:
316:
315:
312:
306:
300:
299:
296:
283:
277:
273:
270:
267:
264:
263:
260:
257:
255:
252:
250:
247:
245:
244:Third opinion
242:
241:
237:
230:
223:
216:
211:
208:
207:
204:
198:
192:
191:
188:
180:
179:
173:
166:
165:
162:
160:
159:
154:
149:
139:
135:
134:
131:
126:
124:
122:
111:
109:
105:
99:
97:
93:
89:
82:
78:
74:
70:
69:Third opinion
67:
66:
57:
53:
52:
44:
40:
37:
33:
32:
29:
19:
448:deliberately
447:
397:
387:
310:
305:User conduct
304:
294:
243:
202:
196:
186:
175:
156:
152:
151:
118:
116:
103:
100:
84:
72:
68:
55:
146:Main page:
104:exclusively
77:good faith
178:talk page
43:WP:DRR/3O
28:Shortcuts
438:See also
130:Shortcut
81:civility
36:WP:DRR/3
138:WP:DRR
16:<
79:and
94:or
98:.
73:3O
71:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
