64:
764:
129:
637:
Because it is less transparent than on-wiki notifications, the use of email, IRC, Discord, or other off-wiki communication to notify editors is strongly discouraged unless there is a significant reason for not using talk page notifications. Sending a notification to a group of editors by email is
458:
Inappropriate notification is generally considered to be disruptive. Canvassing normally involves the posting of messages. However, it may also include other kinds of solicitation, such as a custom signature to automatically append some promotional message to every signed post. Do not use a
256:
The audience must not be selected on the basis of their opinions—for example, if notices are sent to editors who previously supported deleting an article, then identical notices should be sent to those who supported keeping it. Do not send inappropriate notices, as defined in the
831:
In 2005, the
Arbitration Committee ruled that "he occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Knowledge (XXG)'s common practice. However, excessive cross-posting goes against current Knowledge (XXG) community norms. In a broader context, it is "unwiki." See
602:
In the case of a re-consideration of a previous debate (such as a "no consensus" result on an RFC, AFD or CFD), it is similarly inappropriate to send a disproportionate number of notifications specifically to those who expressed a particular viewpoint on the previous debate.
530:
Indiscriminately sending announcements to editors can be disruptive for any number of reasons. If the editors are uninvolved, the message has the function of "spam" and is disruptive to that user's experience. More importantly, recruiting too many editors to a
549:
is an attempt to sway the person reading the message, conveyed through the use of tone, wording, or intent. While this may be appropriate as part of a specific individual discussion, it is inappropriate to canvass with such messages.
590:
Votestacking is an attempt to sway consensus by selectively notifying editors who have or are thought to have a predetermined point of view or opinion (which may be determined, among other ways, from a userpage notice, such as a
143:
In general, it is perfectly acceptable to notify other editors of ongoing discussions, provided that it be done with the intent to improve the quality of the discussion by broadening participation to more fully achieve
610:
on users' talk pages in order to inform editors on all "sides" of a debate (e.g., everyone who participated in a previous deletion debate on a given subject) may be appropriate under certain circumstances.
501:, similar to a political party, in the expectation that notifying the group of any discussion related to that viewpoint will result in a numerical advantage, much as a form of prearranged vote stacking.
137:
When notifying other editors of discussions, keep the number of notifications small, keep the message text neutral, and don't preselect recipients according to their established opinions. Be open!
156:
refers to notification done with the intention of influencing the outcome of a discussion in a particular way, and is considered inappropriate. This is because it compromises the normal
646:
The most effective response to quite recent, clearly disruptive canvassing is to politely request that the user(s) responsible for the canvassing stop posting notices, possibly using
859:
662:
from editing. Users with a prior history of disruptive canvassing, which they have previously been asked to discontinue, may be blocked immediately without further warning.
888:
518:
Soliciting support other than by posting direct messages, such as using a custom signature with a message promoting a specific position on any issue being discussed.
535:
can often make resolving the dispute impossible. Remember that the purpose of a notification is to improve the dispute resolution process, not to disrupt it.
268:, neutrally worded with a neutral title, clear in presentation, and brief—the user can always find out more by clicking on the link to the discussion. The
878:
71:
833:
281:
Note: It is good practice to leave a note at the discussion itself about notifications which have been made, particularly if made to individual users.
190:
An editor who may wish to draw a wider range of informed, but uninvolved, editors to a discussion can place a message at any of the following:
883:
797:
498:
218:
733:
538:
The inclusion of links to discussions, including featured content nominations, in signatures has been found to be disruptive spamming.
206:
686:(bringing fictional or real outside participants into the discussion to create a false impression of support for your viewpoint), and
812:
772:
39:
807:
792:
225:
35:
231:
On the talk pages of a user mentioned in the discussion (particularly if the discussion concerns complaints about user behavior).
687:
584:
473:: Posting an excessive number of messages to individual users, or to users with no significant connection to the topic at hand.
532:
161:
31:
79:
732:, for use in a discussion, to inform other editors that a given user has made few edits outside of this discussion. See
846:
596:
490:
87:
466:
The following behaviors are regarded as characteristic of inappropriate notification (and may be seen as disruptive):
199:
53:
638:
usually looked at more negatively than sending the same message to the same group of people on their talk pages.
157:
515:, for example) to persuade them to join in discussions (unless there is a specific reason not to use talk pages)
214:
210:
195:
17:
782:
683:
265:
705:
675:
671:
592:
486:
258:
717:
802:
787:
755:
708:, article talk page message, based on canvassing activity soliciting feedback from established accounts
620:
559:
290:
173:
96:
83:
546:
512:
849:
for a series of findings by the
Arbitration Committee concerning vote-stacking and improper CANVASS
739:
711:
699:
649:
272:
244:
Editors who have participated in previous discussions on the same topic (or closely related topics)
777:
726:, for use in a discussion, to express concern that a specific user was canvassed to the discussion
723:
485:: Posting messages to users selected based on their known opinions (which may be made known by a
773:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion § After nominating: Notify interested projects and editors
659:
679:
670:
For other types of actions that are inappropriate in the consensus-building process, see the
46:
860:
Knowledge (XXG):Administrators' noticeboard/Archive262#Linking to discussions in signatures
655:
508:
460:
145:
235:
583:"WP:VOTESTACKING" redirects here. For the inactive page about survey notification, see
479:: Posting a notification of discussion that presents the topic in a non-neutral manner.
872:
678:(raising an issue on successive discussion pages until you get the result you want),
522:
Below are brief explanations of the most common types of inappropriate notification:
729:
463:
to send messages to multiple pages as this can be seen as a form of spamming.
278:
template may help in notifying people in a quick, simple, and neutral manner.
152:
763:
497:
involves recruiting editors perceived as having a common viewpoint for a
494:
261:, and do not send messages to users who have asked not to receive them.
654:
on their talk page. If they continue, they may be reported to the
742:, to notify users and groups of users of an RfC in a neutral way
599:), and thus encouraging them to participate in the discussion.
241:
Editors who have made substantial edits to the topic or article
30:"WP:CAN" redirects here. For the Wikiproject about Canada, see
123:
58:
714:, article talk page message, based on sockpuppet activity
82:
may apply. Substantive edits to this page should reflect
834:
Knowledge (XXG):Requests for arbitration/IZAK#Principles
628:
574:
567:
298:
181:
111:
104:
217:) for discussions that have a wider influence such as
202:
which may have interest in the topic under discussion.
736:for more details on proper use of this template.
666:Other forms of inappropriate consensus-building
399:
160:process, and therefore is generally considered
70:This page documents an English Knowledge (XXG)
45:For external advertising in article space, see
238:pages of concerned editors. Examples include:
224:The talk page of one or more directly related
607:
340:
8:
194:The talk page or noticeboard of one or more
18:Knowledge (XXG):Don't enlist the masses
78:Editors should generally follow it, though
889:Knowledge (XXG) project content guidelines
250:Editors who have asked to be kept informed
34:. For the Wikiproject about Canberra, see
656:administrators' noticeboard for incidents
507:: Contacting users off-wiki (by e-mail,
306:
247:Editors known for expertise in the field
824:
798:Knowledge (XXG):Publicising discussions
674:. Apart from canvassing, these include
734:Knowledge (XXG):Single-purpose account
879:Knowledge (XXG) behavioral guidelines
813:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Democracy
437:Excessive cross-posting ("spamming")
40:Knowledge (XXG):Canned edit summaries
7:
808:Knowledge (XXG):Talk page guidelines
793:Knowledge (XXG):Mass message senders
526:Spamming and excessive cross-posting
36:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canberra
585:Knowledge (XXG):Survey notification
658:, which may result in their being
86:. When in doubt, discuss first on
32:Knowledge (XXG):WikiProject Canada
25:
38:. For canned edit summaries, see
762:
127:
62:
753:This page is referenced in the
884:Knowledge (XXG) glossary items
200:Knowledge (XXG) collaborations
54:Knowledge (XXG):Forum shopping
1:
720:, for use on discussion pages
702:, warning for user talk pages
642:How to respond to canvassing
905:
783:Knowledge (XXG):Forum shop
618:
582:
557:
288:
285:Inappropriate notification
171:
94:
88:this guideline's talk page
51:
44:
29:
332:
325:
318:
311:
309:
158:consensus decision-making
27:Knowledge (XXG) guideline
803:Knowledge (XXG):Tag team
788:Knowledge (XXG):Griefing
756:Knowledge (XXG) Glossary
330:
323:
316:
168:Appropriate notification
135:This page in a nutshell:
52:Not to be confused with
493:, or prior statement).
858:See the discussion at
778:Knowledge (XXG):Cabals
706:Template:CANVASWARNING
264:Notifications must be
259:section directly below
718:Template:Not a ballot
819:Notes and references
72:behavioral guideline
47:Knowledge (XXG):Spam
740:Template:Rfc notice
712:Template:Recruiting
700:Template:Uw-canvass
688:tendentious editing
672:policy on consensus
597:user categorization
452:Stealth canvassing
219:policy or guideline
847:WP:False consensus
724:Template:Canvassed
615:Stealth canvassing
608:appropriate notice
533:dispute resolution
505:Stealth canvassing
213:or other relevant
456:
455:
426:
418:
410:
368:
360:
352:
141:
140:
122:
121:
16:(Redirected from
896:
863:
856:
850:
843:
837:
829:
766:
758:
653:
631:
577:
570:
424:
416:
408:
366:
358:
350:
347:Limited posting
307:
301:
277:
271:
207:central location
184:
131:
130:
124:
114:
107:
66:
65:
59:
21:
904:
903:
899:
898:
897:
895:
894:
893:
869:
868:
867:
866:
857:
853:
844:
840:
830:
826:
821:
769:
768:
767:
760:
754:
749:
696:
668:
647:
644:
635:
634:
627:
623:
617:
588:
581:
580:
575:WP:VOTESTACKING
573:
566:
562:
556:
544:
528:
305:
304:
297:
293:
287:
275:
269:
188:
187:
180:
176:
170:
128:
118:
117:
110:
103:
99:
91:
63:
57:
50:
43:
28:
23:
22:
15:
12:
11:
5:
902:
900:
892:
891:
886:
881:
871:
870:
865:
864:
851:
838:
823:
822:
820:
817:
816:
815:
810:
805:
800:
795:
790:
785:
780:
775:
761:
752:
751:
750:
748:
745:
744:
743:
737:
727:
721:
715:
709:
703:
695:
692:
676:forum shopping
667:
664:
643:
640:
633:
632:
624:
619:
616:
613:
579:
578:
571:
563:
558:
555:
552:
543:
540:
527:
524:
520:
519:
516:
502:
480:
474:
454:
453:
450:
448:
445:
443:
440:
438:
435:
431:
430:
427:
422:
419:
414:
411:
406:
403:
395:
394:
391:
389:
386:
384:
381:
379:
376:
373:
372:
369:
364:
361:
356:
353:
348:
345:
337:
336:
331:
329:
324:
322:
317:
315:
310:
303:
302:
294:
289:
286:
283:
254:
253:
252:
251:
248:
245:
242:
232:
229:
222:
203:
186:
185:
177:
172:
169:
166:
139:
138:
132:
120:
119:
116:
115:
108:
100:
95:
92:
77:
76:
67:
26:
24:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
901:
890:
887:
885:
882:
880:
877:
876:
874:
861:
855:
852:
848:
842:
839:
835:
828:
825:
818:
814:
811:
809:
806:
804:
801:
799:
796:
794:
791:
789:
786:
784:
781:
779:
776:
774:
771:
770:
765:
757:
746:
741:
738:
735:
731:
728:
725:
722:
719:
716:
713:
710:
707:
704:
701:
698:
697:
693:
691:
689:
685:
684:meat puppetry
681:
680:sock puppetry
677:
673:
665:
663:
661:
657:
651:
641:
639:
630:
626:
625:
622:
614:
612:
609:
604:
600:
598:
594:
586:
576:
572:
569:
565:
564:
561:
553:
551:
548:
541:
539:
536:
534:
525:
523:
517:
514:
510:
506:
503:
500:
496:
492:
491:user category
488:
484:
483:Vote-stacking
481:
478:
475:
472:
469:
468:
467:
464:
462:
451:
449:
447:Votestacking
446:
444:
441:
439:
436:
433:
432:
428:
423:
420:
415:
412:
407:
405:Mass posting
404:
402:
401:
400:Inappropriate
397:
396:
392:
390:
387:
385:
382:
380:
377:
375:
374:
370:
365:
362:
357:
354:
349:
346:
344:
343:
339:
338:
335:
328:
321:
314:
308:
300:
296:
295:
292:
284:
282:
279:
274:
267:
262:
260:
249:
246:
243:
240:
239:
237:
233:
230:
227:
223:
220:
216:
212:
209:(such as the
208:
204:
201:
197:
193:
192:
191:
183:
179:
178:
175:
167:
165:
163:
159:
155:
154:
149:
147:
136:
133:
126:
125:
113:
109:
106:
102:
101:
98:
93:
89:
85:
81:
75:
73:
68:
61:
60:
55:
48:
41:
37:
33:
19:
854:
841:
827:
730:Template:Spa
669:
645:
636:
605:
601:
589:
568:WP:VOTESTACK
554:Votestacking
545:
537:
529:
521:
504:
495:Vote-banking
482:
476:
470:
465:
457:
442:Campaigning
398:
363:Nonpartisan
341:
334:Transparency
333:
326:
319:
312:
299:WP:INAPPNOTE
280:
263:
255:
221:discussions.
215:noticeboards
211:Village pump
196:WikiProjects
189:
151:
150:
142:
134:
69:
606:Posting an
547:Campaigning
542:Campaigning
477:Campaigning
342:Appropriate
873:Categories
650:Uw-canvass
629:WP:STEALTH
595:, or from
273:Please see
182:WP:APPNOTE
164:behavior.
162:disruptive
153:Canvassing
112:WP:CANVASS
80:exceptions
694:Templates
560:Shortcuts
421:Partisan
236:user talk
198:or other
146:consensus
97:Shortcuts
84:consensus
747:See also
648:{{subst:
621:Shortcut
471:Spamming
355:Neutral
327:Audience
291:Shortcut
226:articles
174:Shortcut
660:blocked
593:userbox
513:Discord
487:userbox
429:Secret
413:Biased
320:Message
234:On the
266:polite
105:WP:CAN
511:, or
499:group
434:Term
371:Open
313:Scale
845:See
682:and
509:IRC
461:bot
367:AND
359:AND
351:AND
875::
690:.
652:}}
489:,
425:OR
417:OR
409:OR
393:↕
388:↕
383:↕
378:↕
276:}}
270:{{
205:A
148:.
862:.
836:.
759:.
587:.
228:.
90:.
74:.
56:.
49:.
42:.
20:)
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.