Knowledge:External peer review

1107:"Many of these details in Knowledge are either incorrect (14) or unverifiable (37) as compared to the four unverified facts in DAH and the three partially incorrect facts in the two Britannicas. For example, the Knowledge article includes several details of Kidd’s childhood that were not confirmed in three principal biographies (Harris, 2002; Ritchie, 1986; Zacks, 2002), and the essay suggests he turned to piracy before most of the biographers indicate. One paragraph of the essay references a children’s book on Kidd, which may oversimplify the man’s career." 4016:— when compared to other samples from the project, including featured article removal candidates, pages marked as NPOV disputes, and a selection of random pages. According to the paper, the study showed how seriously the Knowledge project views issues of article quality. The authors concluded that as a quality standard, the featured article process "is not ideal, but it does seem relatively rigorous." They also noted that the process is not as resource-intensive as other possibilities, such as blind judging. 1097:"this entry in Knowledge is written so that small skirmishes have more prominence than major battles (and some major battles were missing entirely), and readers may have difficulty determining the chronology of the war without reference to specific dates because the entry did not sequence events in chronological order. Unlike the other two samples evaluated, this entry obviously is written by multiple authors with little apparent concern for the overall flow and readability of the article." 3709:

the terms that did not have any entry in Britannica (they all appeared in Knowledge), and any for which the entries were vastly different in length. Sometimes the lengths were balanced by amalgamating two or three Britannica entries into one coherent piece – for example, 'ethanol' was done this way. We felt this represented 'everything Britannica had to say on the subject' – at least, everything we could find by a quick search of Britannica online, exactly the way a user would approach

983:"The study did reveal inaccuracies in eight of the nine entries and exposed major flaws in at least two of the nine Knowledge articles. Overall, Knowledge's accuracy rate was 80 percent compared with 95-96 percent accuracy within the other sources. This study does support the claim that Knowledge is less reliable than other reference resources. Furthermore, the research found at least five unattributed direct quotations and verbatim text from other sources with no citations." 2041:

that we didn't consider to be significant errors, so we're also writing up an accompanying document to explain which errors we counted, and how we arrived at all the numbers. We're also asking the reviewers if they mind being identified, so we'll name those who give permission. That's all quite a bit of work, especially with Jim being away, but I hope we can send this to you by the end of next week, as well as putting it up (free) on our own website. Thanks for your patience!

1129:"One area of further study may be to examine and evaluate Knowledge’s histories themselves. In the brief review of the more detailed history of the Mexican-American War, for instance, this study found that references were deleted and correct facts were modified incorrectly. Also, it would appear that some inaccuracies may have been typing errors. A more detailed study of individual histories may lead to deeper analysis as to the nature of Knowledge’s contributors." 4315:(Grade: C): "While there are no glaring inaccuracies, Mr. McAdam says, the entry does not provide any analytical context as to what led to the civil-rights movement or what happened afterward." Example: "Mr. McAdam notes the insufficiency of links to events before and after this particular 13 years of the movement, not to mention the lack of any broader analysis of what brought about the fight for civil rights, and the movement's political and cultural impacts." 1087:"Despite the disparity in length and depth of the two articles, the Knowledge entry has only one fewer incorrect fact that DAH and has one more unverifiable fact. Still, the Knowledge article has a rather long direct quote in the last paragraph of the John Brown section without attribution, and the one citation included in that section does not accurately reflect the original source (the Knowledge entry lists a different date than the original)." 1563: 1528: 1445: 1308: 4069:: "Non-partisan ratings compiled by National Journal magazine say LaTourette is middle-of-the-road on social issues, not conservative. The National Rifle Association approves of his voting record, but isn't among LaTourette's biggest backers. Ohio's GOP-dominated state legislature eliminated Akron Democrat Tom Sawyer's congressional district after the 2000 Census and gave LaTourette's district its old number, 14." 3899:

WikiMedia foundation advisers and personnel and the employees of Wikia) do not and never will understand these concepts correctly and with depth. One user in particular, Pinktulip, did demonstrate such intellectual mastery and made a steady single-handed effort during January 2006 to ensure that another month did not pass before all the corrections were accomplished. Pinktulip also then

5191:"The St. Petersburg Times recently asked two University of South Florida professors to read a few Knowledge articles on topics in their expertise. Chemistry professor Bill Baker said he was surprised at the amount of technical knowledge posted on the site, but said he found several small errors. "The cancer drug Taxol, for example, is not produced by microbial fermentation." 4321:(Grade: A): "The main section on flow cytometry was well-done and accurate, ... but as you drop into the subsections, the accuracy drops off. I went in and actually made some corrections to these — I said, 'I can't leave these and let the record stand like this.'" Example: "At one point in the entry, the word "homologous" was misused in talking about blood transfusions." 1117:"Knowledge’s entry follows ANB in terms of length and comprehensiveness; it includes 67 facts. All except two are verifiable. Of the remaining 65, ten contain errors. Some of these are minor errors, such as year of birth and number of siblings; others are more significant, such as the number of rescue attempts she made and the number of slaves she helped escaped." 4457:"This would undoubtedly serve as a useful introduction for those with little idea about the subject; this entry would actually be more useful to the average inquirer with its links than would anything in the Encyclopedia Britannica...its politics are probably closest to those of Liberal Democrats... I am considerably impressed with the quality of information" 4674:"To find out how it performs on basic terms in business and economics, we asked Professor Fariba Alamdari, an economist at Cranfield University, to take a look. She says: "I am very impressed. It offers a fairly accurate and comprehensive definition of business terms, with links to other related websites or articles, and sometimes statistics." 2245:

words is probably better than 1 error in a 1000 words); and it might make even less sense to mix both categories in an attempt to gauge any bias in favour or against Knowledge (or Britannica) in the Nature experiment. I would therefore be very careful in drawing any conclusions based on the numbers in the table below. --

4393:"Yesterday, the entry "Muslim" was changed 12 times. Over the past week, it was changed more than 50 times...these ranged from the puerile...to suggestions which are deliberately offensive...Knowledge, which constantly checks that changes improve rather than insult, reverted to the previous entry in less than a minute." 4570:

I think there was another reference which had escaped me which was in the intro and has also been removed (it was a too literal interpretation of the supposed Granita pact). Incidentally the reviewer makes his own howler when he says Lord Liverpool became Prime Minister in 1824. It was actually 1812.

3894:

were not just syntactical corrections: they required an understanding at the semantic level on these scientifically non-controversial and well-understood topics for which there are, in an absolute and objective sense, right and wrong answers that are not intuitively obvious but require the ability to

548:

Hasty, Robert; Garvalosa, Ryan; Barbato, Vincenzo; Valdes, Pedro; Powers, David; Hernandez, Emmanuel; John, Jones; Suciu, Gabriel; Qureshi, Farheen; Popa-Radu, Matei; San Jose, Sergio; Drexler, Nathaniel; Patankar, Rohan; Paz, Jose; King, Christopher; Gerber, Hilary; Valladares, Michael; Somji, Alyaz

5222:

Anne Lundin is a retired professor from the School of Library and Information Studies University of Wisconsin, Madison. She is knowledgeable in Victorian picture books in England and the United States and has documented the history of reviewing of children's books in the late 19th century. She is an

3541:

As a note of caution, since Nature said the lengths of articles they compared were roughly equal, the versions they compared must be different from those whose length we compare here (since our versions are now longer than the EB articles.). This isn't surprising considering the lead time needed to

1322:

Overview: Knowledge article broadly accurate, but messy. Britannica's entry "contained an error in its opening paragraph", "too long for most people's needs", and "reminded me of one of my worst lectures at university". Encarta "clearly written by an expert" and "the only one to display enthusiasm

1049:

Knowledge and DAH have more comprehensive articles than Britannica, though the Knowledge and DAH articles have different focuses. Though the Knowledge article has more unverifiable facts (eight) and inaccuracies (nine) than does DAH, it still holds a higher ratio of accuracy because it includes more

4232:

There is really only one astonishing inaccuracy in this one, under the “Comparisons to Digg” section. ShoutWire doesn’t filter the word “Digg” at all. As a test, I submitted an article titled “Digg.com – Best Site On Earth” and sure enough it appeared on the submissions page. The rest of it was OK,

3828:

While some progress was made in the days immediately after the report came out, the effort stalled as the Christmas 2005 holiday approached. When one examines the progress made before Christmas, one can see that much of the work was "low hanging fruit" in the form of easy corrections to superficial

3661:

I've emailed the news editor and asked if they could provide the exact article date/time versions that they sent to those 50 experts. That should be useful for figuring out if the errors have already been fixed, and for comparing the versions they sent and the soon-to-be more accurate ones. It's

2072:

Of the 42 articles reviewed, 38 were found to have at least one error – Britannica had 40 articles with at least one error. (NOTE: Nature took some of the excerpts for the study from the version of Britannica for children and youths rather than use the official version for adults. Britannica claims

3808:

After failing to make an article contribution to the failed Nupedia proeject, Wales explained years later that even he was intimidated at the thought of submitting an article (in economics: his area of training and experience) to it because was intimidated that experts (rather than amateurs) would

3708:

Each of the reporters that worked on the survey chose 10 to 15 scientific terms that were roughly in their scientific beat – the sorts of things we ourselves would check in an encyclopaedia. We had not looked at any of these entries in either encyclopaedia when we selected them. Then we weeded out

2244:

If it seems to make sense to calculate and compare the ratio errors/words, it probably makes less sense to compare the ratio omissions/words (1 omission in a 5000 words article might be considered to be more serious than 1 omission in a 1000 words article on the same topic, whereas 1 error in 5000

2040:

In light of the amount of interest, we have decided to make the reviews public as far as possible, although obviously we'll have to edit them to remove the names of the reviewers, any libellous statements etc. The reviewers didn't all respond in the same format, and some of them highlighted points

5197:

Professor Philip Levy, an expert on Colonial America, said that "in many respects it's very good," but he, too, had misgivings. He said some articles contained a mishmash of information - the established scholarly knowledge of 15 years ago was mixed in with newer, more controversial theories with

4181:

I searched for “milling”, and found a very general article about milling. Nothing mining-specific was in the article, although a great amount of information on the process of milling was listed. Since I don’t give up that easily, I tried looking up specific milling-related techniques. Nothing for

4159:

Uh oh. Right away I noticed a glaring inaccuracy. Entering “electro-refining” redirected me to “Electrowinning.” Anyone involved in extractive metallurgy can tell you that the two processes are different. Electro-refining should definitely have had it’s own article, since electrowinning pulls the

4681:

She was impressed by the way Knowledge dealt with such terms as Chapter 11 bankruptcy and return on investment, and those with multiple interpretations such as CRM - which an IT manager would read as Customer Relationship Management but a marketing executive would see as Cause-Related Marketing.

3845:

which lists appromixate 1000 users for a realistic list of contributors who have ever contributed substantial amounts of original quality content (with perhaps a factor of 5X for substantial sub unlisted collaborators). There are about 1000 administrators, and less than 100 other users with more

3861:

article was a Featured article at the time of the review and that this article is fortunate to have three PhD chemistry candidates as caretakers (having such expertise involved on an extended basis is a rare situation at Knowledge). The remaining articles required a conceptual understanding of

3840:

Around minute 70 of audio track. March 17, 2006. This further propagates the misconception prompted by the fact that Knowledge has millions of accounts registered. More realistically, Knowledge has only a few thousand active editors (or ten thousand if you use a generous definition of "active

1740:

I got a reply, which sais, basically, that "About the errors, the questionnaire was completed anonymously so there is no list of the articles that contained the errors, let alone the errors themselves." With that, I think we can archive the study, as with such design it is not really a usable

3898:

For the academically honest, these later corrections were not subject to public opinion or Knowledge's style of consensus building akin to voting since most people (and probably most Wikipedians, including the Board of Trustees and past and present members of the Arbitration committee, other

4542:

all relate to assertions added over that weekend to the leading paragraph which were never previously present in the article and were quickly reverted (by me, once I had got back from a weekend break). I think it's a pity because it gives a completely misleading impression of the article.

4207:

Quite frankly, I expected to be overwhelmed with detail on this one. After all, nickel is something that most people come into contact with every day. However, the article glazed over some of nickel’s unique history, and that kind of irked me because the story of nickel is actually quite

3585:

Oh @#$ #@, no it's my fault. I miscounted the EB Vesalius article — it's one of the (very few) EB articles which is spread over multiple pages, and I only counted one page. Similarly with the Woodward article. I'll go back and recheck any others where the imbalance seems to be large.

4474:"A good and fair account. It sounds approving of Larkin, which is nice, but it is overall a dispassionate account, as one would expect from a dictionary...Though I can see there is an opportunity to whitewash with Knowledge, the few times I have used it, I have been impressed with it." 3857:, one sees the pattern: easy fixes or articles with a small number of errors were addressed at the start of the effort. Many of the easy fixes were biographical or narrative in nature and of a "coffee table book" level of understanding typical of an English major. Note that only the 3565:

article (which is one of the egregious examples where WP is 10 times the word count of EB), and you have to go back to 2002 to get significantly shorter than it is now, which seems unlikely. I find it more likely that the editors simply tossed out any obvious stubs or near-stubs.

5127:

A feature of the Knowledge that Hill likes are the links to original sources. It's pretty handy when reading about De Tocqueville to be able to click a link and read the man's own words. But Hill also noted a link that led to a "very brief and shallow essay" about states'

4295:(Grade: B-): "The entry provides 'a plethora of links' and more information than the typical literary encyclopedia, says Mr. Firchow, but it is flawed by 'the annoying inaccuracies, the glaring omissions, and the inconsistencies.'" Example: "The article says Huxley wrote 3850:, there will be only about 2000 "trusted" users, but all users will be rated with new "reliability" software to be implemented. Of course, one's personal relationship with Jimmy Wales or one's popularity within the community will still be able to override this number. 4507:"I am impressed by the amount of information on punting; the two key books on punting are mentioned, as are the clubs...I am impressed. It works on the presumption that by and large people will correct things, and I changed one small thing on my own biography." 92:

are more than welcome and can help to improve Knowledge's articles. In most cases Knowledge will also see an increase in traffic to the articles mentioned, which means that those with poor reviews should be improved to as high a standard as is possible.

2333:

Your fluff is another person's interesting tidbits. =) Honestly, it's hard to make a quantitative assessment of information content, but if there is a large difference in article length then it is a hint that apples are not being compared to apples.

3790:

In the long run, it seems that the project survived the tagging of all articles in which Nature's experts found errors. I would suggest that the tagging was even constructive and usefu. I note that we tag tens of thousands of articles as part of the

4769:: Even the Knowledge people admit the list isn't complete, but it is amazing that someone would try to develop one. Among the local notables: Pinkey Whitney, Joel Horlen, Steve Kerr and Dennis Rodman. Among the MIA: David Robinson and Tim Duncan. 1126:"Eight Knowledge articles contain unattributed quotes and at least five cases of possibly plagiarized content (material found verbatim elsewhere). The researcher found these cases easily without intense scrutiny; more text may have been copied." 3560:

I find that a bit dubious. By that theory, we should be able to date the review by going back to the last time the articles were comparable to the EB articles (which presumably haven't changed much recently). However, I just checked the

162: 4754:: There's a thorough article about the legendary Negro Leaguer from Seguin, although a link to the San Antonio Black Bronchos, where Williams got his start, is available for the enterprising writer to complete (good luck, by the way). 3603:

specifically states "All entries were chosen to be approximately the same length in both encyclopaedias. In a small number of cases some material, such as reference lists, was removed to make the lengths of the entries more similar."

3526:

program. This gives a slight over-estimate because it counts anything surrounded by whitespace as a "word". Britannica counts were taken from Britannica Online. Knowledge articles were from 14 December 2005 except where otherwise

2368:

review did not consider referencing quality. Nature refers to "factual errors, omissions or misleading statements", so some of the "errors" listed below may be errors of omission in incomplete articles, rather than factual errors.

1764:

study then. How can they be sure that those who found Knowledge inaccurate were accurate about the inaccuracies in Knowledge? Ah. That last sentence felt good to write, though I suppose it is not so nice for those who read it. -

4182:

magnetofloatation, but ore dressing finally turned up a shitty little article. The author could have gone into waaaay more detail. This article is inaccurate because of the amount of detail that has been omitted. My conclusion?

4211:

The extractive process was reasonably accurate except for what I can only assume was a typo (substitute “sulfide” for “lateridic” in the first sentence) but no information on milling techniques (some specific to nickel) were

4431:"I think overall that the entry is much better than Dod's parliamentary guide...The references to the 2001 leadership election are categorically wrong...The entry is pretty good though, I would give them 9.5 out of 10." 2342:(see below) where the WP article has apparently been almost 5 times longer than EB's for a year now.) The size differences seem large enough that I'm inclined to think that the 30% difference between EB and WP in the 993:"All the facts are verifiable and correct; the difference here lay in the facts included." Comparisons were made difficult by the varied focus of the articles, but Britannica Online's article was the most extensive. 4444:"That is the problem with Knowledge - most of it is very good and reliable, but it depends on people interested in a subject being able to pontificate... It is opinionated and written from an anti-war point of view" 4163:

Though they could have gone into more detail, the rest of the article is pretty accurate. That being said, I certainly wouldn’t recommend this article as a source for someone researching either electro-refining or

1828:"This extraordinary freedom and cooperation make Knowledge the most important application of the principles of the free and open-source software movement to the world of cultural, rather than software, production." 3647:

According to their website (to which my university gives me access), I am searching the full EB. (They also have "student", "concise", and "elementary" versions of EB, but I'm not using those.) I'm not accusing

3628:

article, even one year ago, was 1108 words or 4.5 times the word count of the EB article. I've searched around EB, and I can't find any huge alternative article on this virus that they could have used instead.

4677:

Prof Alamdari cites the case of gross domestic product. Knowledge provides a definition, shows how it is calculated and gives the GDP by country both in nominal terms and based on PPP (purchasing power parity).

1067:"Knowledge has a single fact error – the number of party representatives in Congress after the 1848 election. Additionally, Knowledge contains a quote apparently from the party’s platform with no attribution." 3749: 145: 2027:

We're trying to see if we can publish the full list of errors found by our reviewers, or least send them to you (and to Britannica if they want). We'll post an update here as soon as we have a firm answer.

870:

Candelario, Danielle M.; Vazquez, Victoria; Jackson, William; Reilly, Timothy (January 2017). "Completeness, accuracy, and readability of Knowledge as a reference for patient medication information".

2234:

Please post below a table of errors/word statistics, based upon the Nature article and the word counts in the corresponding articles, so that we can see a more controlled comparison of error rates.

3842: 4418:"Factually, this is dead accurate, though it is cloaked in po-faced language...it does not mention that she never gives interviews and has never been known to purposefully utter a word in public" 3795:

by rank amateurs and teen-agers with éclat. Perhaps our amateurs are simply uncomfortable being reviewed by experts — just as Jimmy Wales finds working with domain experts to be "intimidating".

460:

Archambault, Patrick M; Belt, Tom H van de; III, Francisco J Grajales; Faber, Marjan J; Kuziemsky, Craig E; Gagnon, Susie; Bilodeau, Andrea; Rioux, Simon; Nelen, Willianne LDM (8 October 2013).

4491:"Accurate, but with an odd conglomeration of facts without a clear idea of what purpose Radio 1 serves or who listens to it. The odd mixture of facts does not tell you about the wider picture." 4831: 3805:

March 24, 2006. Quote: "Nupedia’s 7-step peer review process was heavily biased toward Ph.D holders and other alleged "true experts in their fields," and was evidently elaborate and daunting.

1901: 1848: 1682: 899: 84:

This list aims to be both a record of the findings of these reviews and a way to highlight any problems (or indeed positive aspects) that were encountered. Although Knowledge has its own

3576:

So something is amiss. I somehow doubt Nature compared a 62 word EB article on Robert Burns Woodward to his Knowledge 2300 word article. (And found no significant omissions in EB!) -

5118:. 'In each case, the program responded with information that was accurate and pertinent, if brief,' he wrote. 'I thought the coverage of De Tocqueville, however, was too superficial.' 4682:

Cracks did start to appear, however, with a warning about links to potentially biased commercial sites on the entry for the first interpretation, and no entry at all for the second."

4135:

Sudbury, Ontario is not the most well known city on Earth. I figured that this relatively obscure town would have a paltry Knowledge entry with very little information, and even less

3924:

Britannica has replied to Nature's article and claim the nature article was itself innacurate in a number of ways. It would probably be good for Wikipedians to check the sources

763:

Kräenbring, Jona; Monzon Penza, Tika; Gutmann, Joanna; Muehlich, Susanne; Zolk, Oliver; Wojnowski, Leszek; Maas, Renke; Engelhardt, Stefan; Sarikas, Antonio (24 September 2014).

4742:: The city's one-year adventure into becoming a little bit o' Canada is chronicled in more detail than the Missions' history, which only dates to 1888. It all looks right, too. 966: 2062: 720: 1822:"History is probably the category encompassing the largest number of articles", but the collaborative editing makes it unlike virtually any other scholarly work in that field. 842:

Reilly, Timothy; Jackson, William; Berger, Victoria; Candelario, Danielle (November 2016). "Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Knowledge medication monographs".

2364:

Note that, for a fair comparison, we shouldn't include tables of contents, external links, "see also", or references — most Britannica articles do not include these, and the

2321:

Is this really more controlled? The average WP article has lots of fluff, with no space-pressure to remove same. Errors/omissions-per-article seem a reasonable metric to me.

4142:

The entry for my hometown is absolutely exhaustive. Not a single detail had been overlooked. From history to geography to demographics, the entry could not be more perfect.

404:

Lavsa, Stacey M.; Corman, Shelby L.; Culley, Colleen M.; Pummer, Tara L. (April 2011). "Reliability of Knowledge as a medication information source for pharmacy students".

4312: 1725:

I received an initial reply without a list of articles or errors but the possibility of some more information later; but nothing since then. I suggest that only 1 person,

3837: 3652:

of dishonesty, but I admit I'm mystified. I wouldn't be surprised if they thought a factor of two was "comparable" length, but a factor of almost 5 seems like a lot.

5124:

merits 1,893.) Hill said he would discourage his students from using it as a 'serious source,' but noted that he discourages the use of normal encyclopedias as well.

2201: 4596:

The reference to 1ft is too narrow; the narrowest punt is 1ft 3 inches. The reason given for racing punters to stand in the middle of the punt is slightly bizarre

1039:"Knowledge again has a much higher proportion of unverifiable (three) and factual errors (six) than does either DAH (two incorrect) or Britannica (one incorrect)" 694: 3841:

editor"), with varying levels of knowledge and maturity and many of whom contribute little to mainspace articles outside of reverting obvious vandalism. Refer to

5194:"That bothers me," Baker said of the errors. "I think that even if 99 percent of your facts check out, it is a disservice to promulgate 1 percent inaccuracies." 2193:"several Nature reviewers" found the Knowledge article they reviewed to be "poorly structured and confusing" — a criticism that the report notes is common among 279:

Devgan, Lara; Powe, Neil; Blakey, Brittony; Makary, Martin (September 2007). "Wiki-Surgery? Internal validity of Knowledge as a medical and surgical reference".

3975:

Besiki Stvilia, Michael B. Twidale, Les Gasser, Linda C. Smith (graduate students at Graduate School of Library and Information Science, University of Illinois)

1256:

Overview: Knowledge article judged best. Encarta is "extremely superficial"; Britannica is "polished and factually correct although ... less richly detailed".

1077:"Although all of the entries are brief, there are still disputable facts; Knowledge has the most with four unverifiable facts and three containing errors ..." 5259:

Excellent article! I corrected the date for Greenaway's UNDER THE WINDOW which is 1879. Congratulations on your exemplary piece, rich and full. - Anne Lundin

4736:: Pretty much on the ball, although describing Henry the Puffy Taco as a "child-friendly mascot themed after local cuisine" seems a little cold and clinical. 1887: 1825:

Knowledge articles have numerous authors, many of whom may be anonymous, and there is no expectation that their names are used when discussing their articles.

2200:

unnamed information scientists also "point to other problems with article quality, such as undue prominence given to controversial scientific theories" (see

1224:

Overview: The Knowledge article is poorly written in places and not as comprehensive as Britannica. Encarta "lacks the detail offered in the Wiki piece".

124:

Academic peer reviews are those performed by independent experts in a topic, sometimes with resulting corrected articles published in scholarly journals.

5335: 2212: 300:

Clauson, K. A; Polen, H. H; Boulos, M. N K.; Dzenowagis, J. H (18 November 2008). "Scope, Completeness, and Accuracy of Drug Information in Knowledge".

2266: 2019:

science articles and sent them to experts in the field. The number of "factual errors, critical omissions and misleading statements" were recorded.

907: 425:

Phillips, Jennifer; Lam, Connie; Palmisano, Lisa (2014). "Analysis of the accuracy and readability of herbal supplement information on Knowledge".

4851: 814:

Venkatraman, Anand; Garg, Neetika (2015). "Greater freedom of speech on Web 2.0 correlates with dominance of views linking vaccines to autism".

5316:

A blog that continuously publishes dubiously correct, informal, or humorous excerpts from Knowledge articles. Most of these are not yet fixed.

4855: 3802: 1462:"Following the links takes the interested reader into greater and greater depth, probably further than any traditional encyclopedia I've seen" 967:

http://www.emeraldinsight.com/Insight/viewContentItem.do;jsessionid=6D46A9381C4560FE3E2565C7FDBD8A83?contentType=Article&contentId=1674221

1430:"The Denver Post asked five Colorado scholars to review the Knowledge entries on Islam, Bill Clinton, global warming, China and evolution." 466: 3939: 3782:

Putting a "This article has been identified as possibly containing errors" tag on the front page of each and every articles identified by

3714:

So, the criterion was not "vastly different" in length, which would allow e.g. a factor of two difference, and maybe even a factor of 5.

1681:

Email sent asking for a list of the articles with errors (or a list of the errors) if possible, so we can create a to-do list similar to

5248: 3832:

To be clear: it took several weeks before even 50% of the listed corrections were made. Unfortunately, some Knowledge commentators like

2080: 4766: 5141:

West listed more than half a dozen of these, including the wrong year of birth and a picture of Muller that's not actually Muller."

1391: 4257: 2035:

also received a private email from them in response to a request for more information. I hope they don't mind me posting it below:

1160: 77:

posted by newspapers, magazines, and other agencies outside of Knowledge. Peer reviews are different from general articles about

1333:"slightly messy description of outer Earth layering, which reappears elsewhere in the text, suggesting a lack of decent editing" 972:

A comparison of Knowledge, Encyclopaedia Britannica, The Dictionary of American History and American National Biography Online

674: 5325: 5138:

would look very detailed and well-researched. But to West, who has written a biography of Muller, it was 'fraught with errors.'

2205: 2194: 1804: 272: 110: 106:

on their talk page. Articles that have undergone an external peer review and publication in scholarly journals are tagged with

81:

because they give a critique of one or more articles specifically, often noting problems or highlighting their good qualities.

1583:

first reference cited for the authoritative textbook on evolution by Douglas Futuyma, "so that is excellent, as it should be,"

1218: 5350: 5132:"Dave West, a retired Virginia Tech biology professor, looked up three biology-related sites. One was good, but two were bad. 929: 70: 3836:

were under the false impression that "almost all" of the corrections were made within the first 24 hours of the effort. See

2219:

that Knowledge's strongest suit is the speed at which it can be updated, a factor not considered by the journal's reviewers.

1465:

pleasantly surprised how the main articles "stick to the science and avoid confusing the reader with political controversy."

1952: 1552:

where important translations of Arabic language or fine religious distinctions are required, Knowledge acquits itself well.

5330: 1424: 100: 4208:

entertaining. They could have gone into more detail with the “Old Nick’s Copper” story, for example. Maybe I’m just anal.

3662:

possible that they didn't think to check their versions, but they probably did. I'll pass on the reply when it comes. --

3599:

If there winds up being a significant difference, then the explanation is most likely error or a difference in versions.

4867: 4036: 3862:

chemistry, math, physics and engineering at around the college undergraduate level. The criticisms of articles such as

1546:"It looks like something that might have been done by a young graduate student, or assistant professor, or two or three" 178:

Many academic studies have attempted to assess the overall accuracy of topics in Knowledge (especially medical topics).

3847: 1580:

If a student read through the main entry and the primary links to supporting concepts, he would get a fine introduction

4778:: The one-year experiment in independent baseball, cleverly positioned in San Antonio the year Wolff Stadium opened." 4610: 4013: 3729: 3261: 2609: 1596: 66: 2346:

study is washed out by systematic problems, although that of course depends on the type and severity of the errors.

549:(2014). "Knowledge vs Peer-Reviewed Medical Literature for Information About the 10 Most Costly Medical Conditions". 4309:. Actually, Huxley wrote Brave New World primarily in France and said later that he had not known of We at the time" 2073:

the study is invalid as a result because none of the articles taken from Knowledge were "for children or youths.")

4399: 3907: 3792: 2509: 2168: 5223:

expert in Walter Crane, Randolph Caldecott, and Kate Greenaway and has published several books/papers on the topic

5103:. 'I found the terminology and ages used to be quite accurate and consistent with the most recent data,' he said." 4663: 1934: 765:"Accuracy and Completeness of Drug Information in Knowledge: A Comparison with Standard Textbooks of Pharmacology" 632: 4881: 4556:

The comment about him "saying he would only serve 2 terms" was only there for 19 minutes before I removed it! --

2634: 1452: 1081: 939: 4700: 1929: 1562: 1527: 1444: 1307: 1021: 4058: 3946: 1983:

Nature mag cooked Knowledge study - Britannica hits back at junk science - By Andrew Orlowski in San Francisco

1057:

contains quotes without attribution. Quotes from Theodore Roosevelt and Sinclair Lewis are also unattributed.

2084: 1982: 5107: 4730:" Well, if you're a sports fan, consider this elsewhere. Among the articles that are substantially correct: 3879: 3745: 3638:

Is there an alternative EB website? Are we counting the words in an EB "junior" site? Just a possibility. -

3508: 2810: 2338:

claims that the article lengths were comparable, but I'm finding this hard to reconcile in some cases, e.g.

38: 31: 4074:"LaTourette spokeswoman Deborah Setliff said LaTourette's Knowledge entry contains numerous other mistakes" 2286: 2256:

Britannica displays the word count for each article, doesn't it? At least that part shouldn't take long.

1672:"five reported seeing mistakes and one of those five reported spelling mistakes rather than factual errors" 4451: 3883: 3542:

select the articles, send them out for review, gather the reviews, and compile and publish the results. -

3185: 2860: 2484: 2178: 1570: 1536: 1479: 1250: 1008: 2246: 1831:

The freedom of reuse allowed by open licensing of content is an important advantage for educational uses.

1282: 1195: 652: 5111: 4847: 4561: 4528: 3733: 3436: 1374: 85: 960:

Comparison of Knowledge and other encyclopedias for accuracy, breadth, and depth in historical articles

3210: 1316: 5161: 4733: 4656:

Knowledge’s search for the truth - The online encyclopaedia may soon be as credible as it is popular.

3863: 3756: 2076: 1766: 1734: 1690: 1362: 1346: 1288:

Overview: Knowledge "performs well", Britannica "fares poorly", and Encarta "earns the Dunce's Cap".

1091: 776: 3605: 1912: 1892: 728:

Hwang, Thomas J.; Bourgeois, Florence T.; Seeger, John D. (2014). "Drug Safety in the Digital Age".

228: 5100: 4866:

Many of the articles were quickly improved and the Mail & Guardian published a second article "

4775: 4760:: Trust me, this one about our other member of the Baseball Hall of Fame is correct, if too short. 4751: 3814: 3741: 1897: 1514:

The bulk of it appeared to have been written by the Clinton Museum and Library in Little Rock, Ark.

1242: 1237:"leaves out the prominent theme of the Bismarck cult that flowered after his departure from office" 1143: 1043: 1017: 74: 3810: 335:

Haigh, CA (February 2011). "Knowledge as an evidence source for nursing and healthcare students".

4739: 4187: 3925: 2559: 2409: 2111: 1961: 1939: 1246: 1214: 580: 324: 255: 45: 4796: 3954: 3786:

seemed to some to be a bit of an overreaction. Others were quite comfortable with the practice.

1634: 1410: 4220: 4090: 3937: 1312: 1278: 5115: 4745: 4119:

This text is copied from the review, which I feel is fair use for improving our encyclopedia:

3562: 3361: 3035: 2101: 1748: 1713: 1210: 887: 859: 831: 803: 752: 745: 714: 573: 566: 537: 494: 449: 442: 393: 352: 317: 248: 209: 4823: 3936:

Nature has now issued comments on Britannica's rebuttal, and stands by its original article.

2265: 1050:

facts than other sources. The Knowledge entry is "relatively succinct and tightly written".

5240: 4557: 4300: 4147: 4123: 4066: 3867: 3833: 3672: 3663: 3411: 2584: 2007: 1989: 1859: 1504: 1370: 1071: 879: 851: 823: 794: 784: 737: 558: 528: 518: 485: 475: 434: 413: 384: 376: 344: 309: 288: 240: 201: 4110:

http://www.shoutwire.com/comments/56188/The_Accuracy_of_Wikipedia The Accuracy of Knowledge

189: 4874: 4635: 4607: 4405:"reads like the work of a second-rate undergraduate student... It is a simplistic account" 4345: 4291: 3769: 3753: 3625: 3386: 2734: 2339: 1653: 1608: 1359: 1355: 1343: 1303: 1274: 1061: 5106:"Roanoke College political science professor Bill Hill looked up 19th century politician 4278: 4215:

Other than that, the article was of acceptable quality. My hometown even got a shout-out.

1730: 1686: 5095:

Three college professors were asked to evaluate articles in their areas of expertise.

4929: 4372: 3996: 780: 657: 4941: 4576: 4548: 4494: 4460: 4425: 4318: 3858: 3765: 3085: 2935: 2459: 2136: 2055: 1795: 1511:

thorough and unbiased, giving fair weight to both Clinton accomplishments and scandals.

1439: 1425:

https://web.archive.org/web/20080109025645/https://www.denverpost.com/search/ci_5786064

1139: 1111: 798: 764: 532: 506: 489: 461: 388: 364: 4614: 4579: 4565: 4551: 3914: 3817: 3772: 3759: 3718: 3675: 3666: 3656: 3642: 3633: 3611: 3594: 3580: 3570: 3546: 2350: 2328: 2290: 2275: 2249: 2238: 2088: 1906: 1769: 1755: 1720: 1701: 1658: 1611: 1378: 1349: 1147: 1024: 292: 5344: 5056: 4990: 4980: 4949: 4599: 4477: 4468: 3911: 3639: 3608: 3577: 3543: 3286: 2885: 2835: 1358:

being a featured article I think we need to at least review the issues raised here.

258: 133: 4748:: Wow. This reads like NBA.com, which may be why the Baseline Bums aren't included. 1924: 1648: 583: 507:"Complementary and Alternative Medicine on Knowledge: Opportunities for Improvement" 5244: 5205: 5135: 5121: 5084: 5030: 5010: 4945: 4902: 4843: 4510: 4169: 3715: 3653: 3630: 3591: 3567: 2434: 2347: 2325: 2304: 2235: 2032: 1962:"Fatally flawed: refuting the recent study on encyclopedic accuracy by the journal 1744: 1726: 1709: 1698: 1497: 1101: 900:"JAPhA study shows incomplete and inaccurate patient drug information on Knowledge" 327: 89: 1944: 1295:

of more benefit to the serious student than its Encarta and Britannica equivalents

827: 693:

Chatterjee, Anwesh; Cooke, Robin M.T.; Furst, Ian; Heilman, James (23 June 2014).

244: 166: 149: 789: 4970: 4757: 4709: 4644: 4591: 4501: 4485: 4354: 3311: 3110: 2985: 2709: 2534: 2257: 1868: 1401: 205: 4870:" which said, in part, "...most of the entries have been edited and improved." 4664:

http://www.ebusinessforum.com/index.asp?layout=printer_friendly&doc_id=7931

3829:

criticisms or where specific corrections were offered by the expert reviewers.

1517:"a great place for a student to begin building his or her knowledge" on Clinton 883: 855: 462:"Wikis and Collaborative Writing Applications in Health Care: A Scoping Review" 417: 380: 348: 5170: 4911: 4805: 4603: 4539: 4438: 4304: 4266: 2960: 2121: 2016: 1033: 592: 4940:

Experts review 7 articles and rated them on a 0 to 10 scale. Controversially

748: 569: 445: 438: 251: 212: 17: 5020: 4953: 4572: 4544: 4412: 3950: 3523: 3135: 3010: 2131: 2012: 1994: 1799: 1604: 1557: 78: 1628:

Thomas Chesney (Information Systems, Nottingham University Business School)

890: 862: 834: 806: 755: 612: 576: 540: 497: 452: 396: 365:"Accuracy and completeness of drug information in Knowledge: an assessment" 355: 320: 3530:

Tables of contents, external links, see also, and reference sections were

562: 523: 5000: 3060: 2211:

In Knowledge's defense, Michael Twidale, an information scientist at the

1997: 1539:

religious studies professor Frederick Denny, 40-year specialist in Islam

1004: 987: 741: 4160:

metal out of a solution whereas electro-refining involves a solid anode.

4098: 4045: 3891: 3875: 3871: 3737: 3616:

Note that the references, external links, and "see also" sections were

3516: 3336: 2784: 2759: 2684: 2322: 2303:

No doubt, but this seems the quickest reasonable statistic to gather.

2156: 2146: 1607:

are specifically, otherwise it looks like we just need to bask. :-) --

1492:"and the context of the Silk Road in China's international relations." 1196:

http://www.pcpro.co.uk/features/119640/wikipedia-vs-the-old-guard.html

480: 313: 5305: 5065: 4387: 4195: 1169: 163:

Knowledge articles with corresponding academic peer reviewed articles

96:

Articles that have undergone an external peer review are tagged with

4233:

though. I found the section on editorials to be quite entertaining.

1847:

A complete list of errors with their current status can be found at

1620:

An empirical examination of Knowledge's credibility (November 2006)

1015:

look at paired articles in two of the other three encyclopedias. --

132:

Mechanisms for peer review of individual articles are summarised at

4012:

The focus of the paper was on assessing the information quality of

2270: 3887: 3236: 3160: 2910: 2659: 2183: 2173: 2141: 1800:"Can History be Open Source? Knowledge and the Future of the Past" 1600: 1522: 1473: 5134:

To the average person, the article about 19th century naturalist

593:"Dr. Robert Hasty - Knowledge vs. Peer-Reviewed Medical Articles" 5174: 5069: 4915: 4809: 4713: 4648: 4358: 4270: 4102: 4049: 3982: 3778:

Tagging every Nature-reviewed articles w/errors an overreaction?

3624:

of my counts. I still find discrepancies I can't explain. Our

3520: 1871: 1455:'s Scott Denning, the Monfort Professor of Atmospheric Science. 633:"Don't Trust Knowledge When It Comes to Your Health, Study Says" 5099:"Virginia Tech geologist Bob Bodnar looked up the entry on the 4420:- Marcel D'Argy Smith, former editor of 'Cosmopolitan' magazine 1468:

wishes Knowledge offered better links to basic weather science.

5120:(Note: De Tocqueville's entry weighs in at 1,011 words, while 4000: 1595:

Looks like we got lucky, since 3/5 of the articles picked are

3843:

Knowledge:List of Wikipedians by featured article nominations

2226:

the detailed reviewer reports are now available (see above).

3903:

of the completion of the overall effort on 25 January 2006.

3768:

is now tended by a few PhD Chemistry candidates and is FA.--

3748:

status with the latter being a former featured article (see

229:"The Battle for Knowledge: The New Age of 'Lost Victories'?" 4832:

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2005-11-14/Article evaluations

1697:

Bleh... I had not noticed this yet, and just sent another.

4868:

Knowledge springs into action after M&G Online article

4824:

http://mg.co.za/article/2005-11-07-can-you-trust-wikipedia

1902:

Knowledge:External_peer_review/Nature_December_2005/Errors

1849:

Knowledge:External peer review/Nature December 2005/Errors

1683:

Knowledge:External_peer_review/Nature_December_2005/Errors

999:

Unfortunately, the author failed to notice that Knowledge

4407:- Orlando Figes, professor of history at Birkbeck College 2094:

The following articles had the highest number of errors:

1330:

good for the bare facts but didn't read particularly well

1489:"mishandled the issue of Korean independence from China" 190:"Glaring Chemical Errors Persist for Years on Knowledge" 146:

Knowledge articles published in peer-reviewed literature

3900: 3854: 1654:

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20061127-8296.html

1366: 1201:

A comparison between Knowledge, Encarta and Britannica

53: 1603:

needs work, not sure what "stylistic infelicities" in

1266:

a few recent studies are missing from the bibliography

4930:

http://www.guardian.co.uk/g2/story/0,,1599116,00.html

4373:

http://news.independent.co.uk/media/article345103.ece

3997:

http://www.isrl.uiuc.edu/~stvilia/papers/qualWiki.pdf

1586:

rest of the source list appropriate, and well-rounded

511:

Evidence-Based Complementary and Alternative Medicine

4944:(former Editor-in-Chief of Britannica) reviewed the 4059:

Congressman's Knowledge entry mixes fact and fiction

2284:

You'd think that not all words are created equal. —

2063:

Knowledge:Knowledge Signpost/2005-12-19/Nature study

1011:; as a result, her comparison was flawed, since she 675:"Is Knowledge a reliable source for medical advice?" 3515:Word counts were computed by pasting text from the 1659:

http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=06/11/28/1622217

1642:

An empirical examination of Knowledge's credibility

1365:16:07, 16 June 2007 (UTC) It's changed a lot since 1269:

Military and technical details are ... well handled

551:

The Journal of the American Osteopathic Association

4313:African-American Civil Rights Movement (1955-1968) 3752:, though there is virtually no discussion there). 2189:Nature's special report also noted the following: 2164:The following articles had no errors highlighted: 1486:"simplistic, and in some places, even incoherent." 695:"Is Knowledge's medical content really 90% wrong?" 613:"Trust your doctor, not Knowledge, say scientists" 4594:article mentioned two specific minor criticisms: 1649:http://firstmonday.org/issues/issue11_11/chesney/ 369:Journal of the Medical Library Association : JMLA 4172:(The author was looking for ore milling, Grade: 2050:: The reviewer reports are now available on the 1577:"good," even if "stylistic infelicities abound." 1189:Knowledge Uncovered: Knowledge vs. The Old Guard 719:: CS1 maint: bot: original URL status unknown ( 5085:http://www.roanoke.com/news/roanoke/wb/xp-26511 2202:Knowledge:Guidelines for controversial articles 1888:Nature blog: Comparing Knowledge and Britannica 872:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 844:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 427:Journal of the American Pharmacists Association 4721:David King: Knowledge accurate for S.A. sports 4602:has fixed both and added a section on racing. 3732:status, and none have undergone our internal 1549:clinical and straightforward, but not boring. 8: 5077:Professors give online resource mixed grades 4366:Knowledge under the microscope over accuracy 3990:Information Quality Discussions in Knowledge 3965:Information Quality Discussions in Knowledge 653:"Are Knowledge Health Tips Making You Sick?" 4513:, director of the National Portrait Gallery 4463:, fertility expert and television presenter 4383:The paper reviewed the following articles: 1619: 1003:(and still does) have separate articles on 701:. Archived from the original on 2 July 2014 281:Journal of the American College of Surgeons 5336:Category:Externally peer reviewed articles 5110:of Caroline County, political philosopher 4877:rewrote the Media in South Africa article. 2213:University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign 1503:Bob Loevy, political science professor at 1298:"the layman may find too much information" 406:Currents in Pharmacy Teaching and Learning 363:Kupferberg, N; Protus, BM (October 2011). 3928:and note needed changes in our articles. 1900:(pdf) - link dead, contents available at 1893:"Internet encyclopaedias go head to head" 1055:Zen and the Art of Motorcycle Maintenance 797: 788: 531: 522: 488: 479: 387: 4958: 4846:and gave them scores ranging from 2/10 ( 4446:- John Rentoul, biographer of Tony Blair 3838:Web of Ideas: The Authority of Knowledge 2374: 2208:for guidelines related to this problem); 1560: 1525: 1442: 1234:"a marked deterioration towards the end" 5247:. (A copy of the email can be found at 4948:article. The scores ranged from 0/10 ( 4852:South Africa national rugby league team 1990:Britannica 'still rules' over web rival 4856:South Africa national rugby union team 4763:Among those that could use your help: 4524:Most of the articles were tagged with 1879:Internet encyclopedias go head to head 1745:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1710:Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus 1183:154 (August 2007), pages 134 & 135 712: 233:The Journal of Slavic Military Studies 5243:sent an email asking for feedback on 3910:is an ongoing problem at Knowledge.-- 3895:master technical concepts and facts. 1418:"Grading Knowledge", By Michael Booth 7: 3803:The Trends Underlying Enterprise 2.0 3699:From the editors (see supplementary 3590:: counts should be corrected now.) 1971:. Encyclopædia Britannica, Inc. 2006 1507:and frequent writer on Bill Clinton 467:Journal of Medical Internet Research 5249:User:Smallman12q/Emails/Anne Lundin 3728:None of the articles reviewed have 3671:No reply. Ah, well. We'll see. -- 69:list of reviews of the accuracy of 4767:List of athletes on Wheaties boxes 4279:Can Knowledge Ever Make the Grade? 3811:Interview: Knowledge to the people 1573:biology professor Jeffrey Mitton 188:Mandler, Michael D. (2017-01-26). 159: 142: 128:Assessments of individual articles 25: 5306:http://citationneeded.tumblr.com/ 4772:And among the missing in action: 4299:in Britain and was influenced by 4258:The Chronicle of Higher Education 4247:The Chronicle of Higher Education 293:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.06.190 4842:Reviewed 8 articles relating to 2264: 1599:, we could hope they'd be good. 1561: 1526: 1443: 1306: 925:Reference Services Review (2008) 904:American Pharmacists Association 174:Assessments of multiple articles 5326:Template:Academic peer reviewed 4880:Inaccuracies were removed from 2206:Knowledge:Neutral point of view 1805:The Journal of American History 1459:"a great primer on the subject" 730:New England Journal of Medicine 651:Gagnon, Tiffany (28 May 2014). 611:Stephens, Pippa (28 May 2014). 273:Health information on Knowledge 3915:20:14, 26 September 2007 (UTC) 3846:elevated access. Also, in the 1482:history professor William Wei 1247:Britannica (Franco-German War) 1053:The last paragraph discussing 673:Dillner, Luisa (1 June 2014). 1: 5331:Template:External peer review 4615:08:23, 15 February 2006 (UTC) 4580:09:57, 14 February 2006 (UTC) 4566:23:18, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 4552:15:34, 13 February 2006 (UTC) 3760:19:48, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3719:17:35, 22 December 2005 (UTC) 3676:19:32, 18 December 2005 (UTC) 3667:23:09, 16 December 2005 (UTC) 3657:08:14, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3643:08:08, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3634:07:31, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3612:07:24, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3595:07:02, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3581:06:59, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3571:06:55, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 3547:06:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2351:08:35, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2329:07:37, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2291:03:43, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2276:03:29, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2239:02:53, 15 December 2005 (UTC) 2089:00:02, 25 November 2012 (UTC) 1702:23:12, 29 November 2006 (UTC) 1263:"clearer" and "more elegant" 828:10.1016/j.vaccine.2015.01.078 245:10.1080/13518046.2018.1487198 194:Journal of Chemical Education 27:"WP:EPR" redirects here. For 3999:(draft version submitted to 1788:Journal of American History 1283:Encarta (Circulatory System) 1231:"Largely sound on the facts" 1121:Additional overall comments: 790:10.1371/journal.pone.0106930 591:Hasty, Robert (8 May 2014). 227:Stahel, David (2018-07-03). 4190:20:23, 8 March 2007 (UTC)) 4014:Knowledge:featured articles 3855:status at the start of 2006 3818:22:15, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 3773:22:19, 3 October 2007 (UTC) 3262:Royal Greenwich Observatory 2610:Chandrasekhar, Subrahmanyan 2250:20:48, 8 January 2006 (UTC) 2061:This review was covered at 1597:Knowledge:Featured articles 631:Kedmey, Dan (27 May 2014). 206:10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00478 67:Knowledge project namespace 5367: 4400:Russian Revolution of 1917 3908:Knowledge:Expert retention 3793:Category:Knowledge backlog 2510:Australopithecus africanus 2230:Errors per word comparison 2169:Subrahmanyan Chandrasekhar 1756:17:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC) 1721:22:20, 16 March 2007 (UTC) 1387:The Denver Post (May 2007) 1379:00:00, 27 April 2008 (UTC) 898:Mary Warner (2017-01-30). 884:10.1016/j.japh.2016.12.063 856:10.1016/j.japh.2016.10.007 418:10.1016/j.cptl.2011.01.007 381:10.3163/1536-5050.99.4.010 349:10.1016/j.nedt.2010.05.004 270: 43: 26: 4882:African National Congress 4186:(Emphasis added is mine. 2383: 2380: 2377: 1907:List of articles reviewed 1770:10:39, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1706:Same here. Any replies?-- 1612:01:41, 28 July 2007 (UTC) 1453:Colorado State University 1350:15:53, 16 June 2007 (UTC) 1148:06:26, 10 June 2008 (UTC) 1025:21:21, 1 March 2009 (UTC) 940:Reference Services Review 302:Annals of Pharmacotherapy 4923:Can you trust Knowledge? 4817:Can you trust Knowledge? 4701:San Antonio Express-News 4690:San Antonio Express-News 4659:Author - Robert Matthews 3931: 3736:process. Two articles, 2058:format. See above URL. 1945:Scientific American blog 1082:Battle of Harper's Ferry 439:10.1331/JAPhA.2014.13181 4139:info. I was dead wrong. 3880:Field effect transistor 3507:* - Articles marked as 2811:Field effect transistor 1898:Nature reviewer reports 1729:, does a follow up. -- 1138:None that I have seen. 75:other Knowledge content 39:Knowledge:Edit requests 5261: 4452:In vitro fertilisation 4235: 4217: 4192: 4166: 4144: 4027:Plain Dealer July 2007 3884:Kinetic isotope effect 3437:Woodward, Robert Burns 3186:Punctuated equilibrium 2861:Kinetic isotope effect 2195:information scientists 2179:Punctuated equilibrium 1920:Related news articles: 1480:University of Colorado 1009:Badlands National Park 111:academic peer reviewed 90:respected publications 88:process, reviews from 5351:Knowledge peer review 5257: 5198:little distinction." 5112:Alexis De Tocqueville 4848:Media in South Africa 4230: 4205: 4184:Worst. Article. Ever. 4179: 4157: 4133: 3919: 2485:Archimedes' principle 563:10.7556/jaoa.2014.035 505:Koo, Malcolm (2014). 337:Nurse Education Today 5182:There's no end to it 5162:St. Petersburg Times 5151:St. Petersburg Times 4734:San Antonio Missions 4590:The reviewer of the 3901:informed Jimmy Wales 3864:Archimedes Principle 3853:If one examines the 1957:Britannica rebuttal 1092:Mexican-American War 742:10.1056/NEJMp1401767 101:external peer review 63:External peer review 5101:geologic time scale 4797:Mail & Guardian 4786:Mail & Guardian 4776:San Antonio Tejanos 4752:Smokey Joe Williams 3947:made a presentation 3824:Correction progress 3742:Pythagorean theorem 3211:Pythagoras' theorem 1243:Franco-Prussian War 1044:Chautauqua movement 781:2014PLoSO...9j6930K 524:10.1155/2014/105186 86:article peer review 5255:The response was: 5220:Expert background: 4740:San Antonio Texans 4538:The criticisms of 4303:'s dystopic novel 3920:Britannica's Reply 3716:—Steven G. Johnson 3654:—Steven G. Johnson 3631:—Steven G. Johnson 3592:—Steven G. Johnson 3568:—Steven G. Johnson 2560:Cambrian explosion 2410:Acheulean industry 2348:—Steven G. Johnson 2305:—Steven G. Johnson 2236:—Steven G. Johnson 2132:Acheulean industry 2112:Cambrian explosion 2043:(15 December 2005) 2022:From their blog: 1369:. Over 800 edits. 1323:for the subject". 1156:PC Pro (June 2007) 71:Knowledge articles 5116:Federalist Papers 5039: 5038: 4829:Signpost article: 4746:San Antonio Spurs 3932:Nature's Response 3563:Vesalius, Andreas 3534:from word counts. 3519:browser into the 3511: 3504: 3503: 3362:Vesalius, Andreas 3036:Mendeleev, Dmitry 2079:comment added by 1543:"quite impressed" 1211:Otto von Bismarck 878:(2): 197–200.e1. 850:(2): 193–196.e1. 822:(33): 1422–1425. 736:(26): 2460–2462. 481:10.2196/jmir.2787 314:10.1345/aph.1L474 308:(12): 1814–1821. 16:(Redirected from 5358: 5285: 5284: 5280: 5241:User:Smallman12q 4959: 4533: 4527: 4433:- Ann Widdecombe 4301:Yevgeny Zamyatin 4148:Electro refining 4124:Sudbury, Ontario 4067:Steve LaTourette 4037:The Plain Dealer 3926:Britannica gives 3868:Dmitri Mendeleev 3834:David Weinberger 3730:featured article 3506: 3412:Wolfram, Stephen 2585:Cavity magnetron 2375: 2289: 2287:Ambush Commander 2273: 2269: 2268: 2261: 2102:Dmitry Mendeleev 2091: 1979: 1977: 1976: 1970: 1913:Nature editorial 1813: 1753: 1751: 1718: 1716: 1566: 1565: 1531: 1530: 1505:Colorado College 1448: 1447: 1310: 1072:Niagara Movement 1020: 911: 906:. Archived from 894: 866: 838: 810: 801: 792: 759: 724: 718: 710: 708: 706: 689: 687: 685: 669: 667: 665: 647: 645: 643: 627: 625: 623: 607: 605: 603: 587: 544: 535: 526: 501: 492: 483: 456: 421: 400: 391: 359: 331: 296: 262: 216: 168: 161: 151: 144: 115: 109: 105: 99: 56: 36: 30: 21: 5366: 5365: 5361: 5360: 5359: 5357: 5356: 5355: 5341: 5340: 5322: 5314: 5286: 5282: 5278: 5276: 5275: 5266: 5236: 5229:: July 28, 2010 5210: 5189: 5154: 5093: 5049: 4965:Mark out of 10 4938: 4895: 4864: 4840: 4789: 4728: 4693: 4672: 4636:Financial Times 4628: 4625:Financial Times 4531: 4525: 4522: 4480:, Poet Laureate 4381: 4346:The Independent 4338: 4335:The Independent 4328: 4297:Brave New World 4292:Brave New World 4287: 4250: 4240: 4164:electrowinning. 4117: 4084: 4029: 4022: 4010: 3969: 3934: 3922: 3848:new master plan 3826: 3780: 3726: 3703:report above): 3626:West Nile virus 3387:West Nile Virus 2340:West Nile virus 2285: 2271: 2263: 2259: 2232: 2074: 2070: 1974: 1972: 1968: 1960: 1951:other links at 1844: 1842:(December 2005) 1819: 1794: 1792: 1767:Ta bu shi da yu 1754: 1749: 1743: 1719: 1714: 1708: 1679: 1669: 1622: 1593: 1436: 1392:Discussion page 1389: 1356:plate tectonics 1340: 1304:Plate tectonics 1275:Atherosclerosis 1207: 1161:Discussion page 1158: 1136: 1062:Free Soil party 1016: 978: 930:Discussion page 927: 920: 897: 869: 841: 813: 762: 727: 711: 704: 702: 692: 683: 681: 679:theguardian.com 672: 663: 661: 650: 641: 639: 630: 621: 619: 610: 601: 599: 590: 547: 504: 459: 424: 403: 362: 334: 299: 278: 275: 269: 226: 223: 187: 184: 176: 171: 170: 169: 158: 154: 153: 152: 141: 130: 122: 113: 107: 103: 97: 60: 59: 52: 48: 42: 34: 28: 23: 22: 15: 12: 11: 5: 5364: 5362: 5354: 5353: 5343: 5342: 5339: 5338: 5333: 5328: 5321: 5318: 5313: 5310: 5309: 5308: 5300: 5294: 5274: 5270: 5267: 5265: 5262: 5253: 5252: 5235: 5232: 5231: 5230: 5224: 5217: 5209: 5203: 5200: 5188: 5185: 5184: 5183: 5177: 5165: 5153: 5148: 5145: 5144: 5143: 5130: 5104: 5092: 5089: 5088: 5087: 5078: 5072: 5060: 5048: 5043: 5040: 5037: 5036: 5033: 5027: 5026: 5023: 5017: 5016: 5013: 5007: 5006: 5003: 4997: 4996: 4993: 4987: 4986: 4983: 4977: 4976: 4973: 4967: 4966: 4963: 4942:Robert McHenry 4937: 4934: 4933: 4932: 4924: 4918: 4906: 4894: 4889: 4886: 4885: 4884: 4878: 4863: 4860: 4839: 4836: 4835: 4834: 4826: 4818: 4812: 4800: 4788: 4783: 4780: 4727: 4724: 4723: 4722: 4716: 4704: 4692: 4687: 4684: 4671: 4668: 4667: 4666: 4660: 4657: 4651: 4639: 4627: 4622: 4619: 4618: 4617: 4587: 4586: 4585: 4584: 4583: 4582: 4521: 4518: 4517: 4516: 4515: 4514: 4499: 4498: 4497: 4495:Simon Garfield 4483: 4482: 4481: 4466: 4465: 4464: 4461:Robert Winston 4449: 4448: 4447: 4436: 4435: 4434: 4426:Ann Widdecombe 4423: 4422: 4421: 4410: 4409: 4408: 4397: 4396: 4395: 4380: 4377: 4376: 4375: 4367: 4361: 4349: 4337: 4332: 4329: 4327: 4324: 4323: 4322: 4319:Flow cytometry 4316: 4310: 4286: 4283: 4282: 4281: 4273: 4261: 4249: 4244: 4241: 4239: 4236: 4229: 4228: 4204: 4203: 4178: 4177: 4156: 4155: 4132: 4131: 4116: 4113: 4112: 4111: 4105: 4093: 4083: 4080: 4077: 4076: 4075: 4071: 4070: 4063: 4062: 4052: 4039: 4028: 4025: 4021: 4018: 4009: 4006: 4005: 4004: 3991: 3985: 3976: 3968: 3962: 3959: 3933: 3930: 3921: 3918: 3859:Aldol reaction 3825: 3822: 3821: 3820: 3815:76.204.176.148 3813:31 Jan 2007.-- 3806: 3788: 3779: 3776: 3766:Aldol reaction 3725: 3724:Article status 3722: 3712: 3711: 3697: 3696: 3695: 3694: 3693: 3692: 3691: 3690: 3689: 3688: 3687: 3686: 3685: 3684: 3683: 3682: 3681: 3680: 3679: 3678: 3669: 3552: 3551: 3550: 3549: 3536: 3535: 3528: 3502: 3501: 3498: 3495: 3492: 3489: 3486: 3483: 3479: 3478: 3476: 3473: 3470: 3468: 3465: 3462: 3458: 3457: 3454: 3451: 3448: 3445: 3442: 3439: 3433: 3432: 3429: 3426: 3423: 3420: 3417: 3414: 3408: 3407: 3404: 3401: 3398: 3395: 3392: 3389: 3383: 3382: 3379: 3376: 3373: 3370: 3367: 3364: 3358: 3357: 3354: 3351: 3348: 3345: 3342: 3339: 3333: 3332: 3329: 3326: 3323: 3320: 3317: 3314: 3308: 3307: 3304: 3301: 3298: 3295: 3292: 3289: 3283: 3282: 3279: 3276: 3273: 3270: 3267: 3264: 3258: 3257: 3254: 3251: 3248: 3245: 3242: 3239: 3233: 3232: 3229: 3226: 3223: 3220: 3217: 3214: 3207: 3206: 3203: 3200: 3197: 3194: 3191: 3188: 3182: 3181: 3178: 3175: 3172: 3169: 3166: 3163: 3157: 3156: 3153: 3150: 3147: 3144: 3141: 3138: 3132: 3131: 3128: 3125: 3122: 3119: 3116: 3113: 3107: 3106: 3103: 3100: 3097: 3094: 3091: 3088: 3086:Neural network 3082: 3081: 3078: 3075: 3072: 3069: 3066: 3063: 3057: 3056: 3053: 3050: 3047: 3044: 3041: 3038: 3032: 3031: 3028: 3025: 3022: 3019: 3016: 3013: 3007: 3006: 3003: 3000: 2997: 2994: 2991: 2988: 2982: 2981: 2978: 2975: 2972: 2969: 2966: 2963: 2957: 2956: 2953: 2950: 2947: 2944: 2941: 2938: 2936:Lomborg, Bjorn 2932: 2931: 2928: 2925: 2922: 2919: 2916: 2913: 2907: 2906: 2903: 2900: 2897: 2894: 2891: 2888: 2882: 2881: 2878: 2875: 2872: 2869: 2866: 2863: 2857: 2856: 2853: 2850: 2847: 2844: 2841: 2838: 2832: 2831: 2828: 2825: 2822: 2819: 2816: 2813: 2807: 2806: 2803: 2800: 2797: 2794: 2791: 2788: 2781: 2780: 2777: 2774: 2771: 2768: 2765: 2762: 2756: 2755: 2752: 2749: 2746: 2743: 2740: 2737: 2731: 2730: 2727: 2724: 2721: 2718: 2715: 2712: 2706: 2705: 2702: 2699: 2696: 2693: 2690: 2687: 2681: 2680: 2677: 2674: 2671: 2668: 2665: 2662: 2656: 2655: 2652: 2649: 2646: 2643: 2640: 2637: 2631: 2630: 2627: 2624: 2621: 2618: 2615: 2612: 2606: 2605: 2602: 2599: 2596: 2593: 2590: 2587: 2581: 2580: 2577: 2574: 2573:702 (13 Dec.) 2571: 2568: 2565: 2562: 2556: 2555: 2552: 2549: 2546: 2543: 2540: 2537: 2531: 2530: 2527: 2524: 2521: 2518: 2515: 2512: 2506: 2505: 2502: 2499: 2496: 2493: 2490: 2487: 2481: 2480: 2477: 2474: 2471: 2468: 2465: 2462: 2460:Aldol reaction 2456: 2455: 2452: 2449: 2446: 2443: 2440: 2437: 2431: 2430: 2427: 2424: 2421: 2418: 2415: 2412: 2406: 2405: 2402: 2399: 2396: 2393: 2390: 2386: 2385: 2382: 2379: 2372: 2362: 2361: 2360: 2359: 2358: 2357: 2356: 2355: 2354: 2353: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2309: 2308: 2307: 2296: 2295: 2294: 2293: 2279: 2278: 2253: 2252: 2247:83.180.100.151 2231: 2228: 2221: 2220: 2209: 2198: 2187: 2186: 2181: 2176: 2171: 2162: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2151: 2150: 2149: 2144: 2139: 2137:Neural network 2134: 2126: 2125: 2124: 2116: 2115: 2114: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2069: 2066: 2056:Microsoft Word 2045: 2044: 2030: 2029: 2004: 2003: 2002: 2001: 1985: 1980: 1955: 1949: 1948: 1947: 1942: 1937: 1932: 1927: 1917: 1916: 1915: 1910: 1904: 1895: 1890: 1880: 1874: 1863: 1852: 1851: 1843: 1837: 1834: 1833: 1832: 1829: 1826: 1823: 1818: 1815: 1796:Roy Rosenzweig 1791: 1785: 1782: 1781: 1780: 1779: 1778: 1777: 1776: 1775: 1774: 1773: 1772: 1742: 1707: 1678: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1668: 1665: 1664: 1663: 1662: 1661: 1656: 1643: 1637: 1629: 1621: 1618: 1615: 1592: 1589: 1588: 1587: 1584: 1581: 1578: 1568: 1567: 1554: 1553: 1550: 1547: 1544: 1533: 1532: 1519: 1518: 1515: 1512: 1501: 1500: 1494: 1493: 1490: 1487: 1477: 1476: 1470: 1469: 1466: 1463: 1460: 1450: 1449: 1440:Global warming 1435: 1432: 1428: 1427: 1419: 1413: 1405: 1388: 1385: 1382: 1339: 1336: 1335: 1334: 1331: 1320: 1319: 1300: 1299: 1296: 1286: 1285: 1271: 1270: 1267: 1264: 1254: 1253: 1239: 1238: 1235: 1232: 1222: 1221: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1198: 1190: 1184: 1178: 1172: 1157: 1154: 1151: 1135: 1132: 1131: 1130: 1127: 1115: 1114: 1112:Harriet Tubman 1105: 1104: 1095: 1094: 1085: 1084: 1075: 1074: 1065: 1064: 1047: 1046: 1037: 1036: 1030: 1029: 1028: 1027: 1018:John Broughton 991: 990: 977: 974: 970: 969: 961: 955: 954:vol. 26, no. 1 949: 943: 926: 923: 919: 916: 915: 914: 913: 912: 910:on 2017-01-30. 867: 839: 811: 775:(9): e106930. 760: 725: 690: 670: 648: 628: 608: 588: 557:(5): 368–373. 545: 502: 457: 422: 412:(2): 154–158. 401: 360: 332: 297: 287:(3): S76–S77. 268: 265: 264: 263: 239:(3): 396–402. 222: 219: 218: 217: 200:(3): 271–272. 183: 180: 175: 172: 157: 156: 155: 140: 139: 138: 129: 126: 121: 118: 58: 57: 49: 44: 37:requests, see 32:edit protected 24: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 5363: 5352: 5349: 5348: 5346: 5337: 5334: 5332: 5329: 5327: 5324: 5323: 5319: 5317: 5311: 5307: 5304: 5301: 5298: 5295: 5293: 5291: 5288: 5287: 5281: 5273: 5271: 5269: 5263: 5260: 5256: 5250: 5246: 5242: 5238: 5237: 5233: 5228: 5225: 5221: 5218: 5216:: Anne Lundin 5215: 5212: 5211: 5208:Expert Review 5207: 5204: 5202: 5199: 5195: 5192: 5186: 5181: 5178: 5176: 5172: 5169: 5166: 5164: 5163: 5159: 5156: 5155: 5152: 5149: 5147: 5142: 5139: 5137: 5131: 5129: 5125: 5123: 5117: 5113: 5109: 5105: 5102: 5098: 5097: 5096: 5090: 5086: 5082: 5079: 5076: 5073: 5071: 5067: 5064: 5061: 5059: 5058: 5057:Roanoke Times 5054: 5051: 5050: 5047: 5046:Roanoke Times 5044: 5042: 5034: 5032: 5029: 5028: 5024: 5022: 5019: 5018: 5014: 5012: 5009: 5008: 5004: 5002: 4999: 4998: 4994: 4992: 4991:Basque people 4989: 4988: 4984: 4982: 4981:Haute couture 4979: 4978: 4974: 4972: 4969: 4968: 4964: 4962:Article name 4961: 4960: 4957: 4955: 4951: 4950:Haute couture 4947: 4943: 4935: 4931: 4928: 4925: 4922: 4919: 4917: 4913: 4910: 4907: 4905: 4904: 4900: 4897: 4896: 4893: 4890: 4888: 4883: 4879: 4876: 4873: 4872: 4871: 4869: 4861: 4859: 4857: 4853: 4849: 4845: 4837: 4833: 4830: 4827: 4825: 4822: 4819: 4816: 4813: 4811: 4807: 4804: 4801: 4799: 4798: 4794: 4791: 4790: 4787: 4784: 4782: 4779: 4777: 4773: 4770: 4768: 4764: 4761: 4759: 4755: 4753: 4749: 4747: 4743: 4741: 4737: 4735: 4731: 4725: 4720: 4717: 4715: 4711: 4708: 4705: 4703: 4702: 4698: 4695: 4694: 4691: 4688: 4686: 4683: 4679: 4675: 4669: 4665: 4661: 4658: 4655: 4652: 4650: 4646: 4643: 4640: 4638: 4637: 4633: 4630: 4629: 4626: 4623: 4621: 4616: 4612: 4609: 4605: 4601: 4597: 4593: 4589: 4588: 4581: 4578: 4574: 4569: 4568: 4567: 4563: 4559: 4555: 4554: 4553: 4550: 4546: 4541: 4537: 4536: 4535: 4530: 4519: 4512: 4508: 4505: 4504: 4503: 4500: 4496: 4492: 4489: 4488: 4487: 4484: 4479: 4478:Andrew Motion 4475: 4472: 4471: 4470: 4469:Philip Larkin 4467: 4462: 4458: 4455: 4454: 4453: 4450: 4445: 4442: 4441: 4440: 4437: 4432: 4429: 4428: 4427: 4424: 4419: 4416: 4415: 4414: 4411: 4406: 4403: 4402: 4401: 4398: 4394: 4391: 4390: 4389: 4386: 4385: 4384: 4378: 4374: 4371: 4368: 4365: 4362: 4360: 4356: 4353: 4350: 4348: 4347: 4343: 4340: 4339: 4336: 4333: 4331: 4325: 4320: 4317: 4314: 4311: 4308: 4307: 4302: 4298: 4294: 4293: 4289: 4288: 4284: 4280: 4277: 4274: 4272: 4268: 4265: 4262: 4260: 4259: 4255: 4252: 4251: 4248: 4245: 4243: 4237: 4234: 4226: 4222: 4219: 4218: 4216: 4213: 4209: 4201: 4197: 4194: 4193: 4191: 4189: 4188:Jesse Viviano 4185: 4175: 4171: 4168: 4167: 4165: 4161: 4153: 4149: 4146: 4145: 4143: 4140: 4138: 4129: 4125: 4122: 4121: 4120: 4114: 4109: 4106: 4104: 4100: 4097: 4094: 4092: 4089: 4086: 4085: 4081: 4079: 4073: 4072: 4068: 4065: 4064: 4060: 4056: 4053: 4051: 4047: 4043: 4040: 4038: 4034: 4031: 4030: 4026: 4024: 4019: 4017: 4015: 4007: 4002: 3998: 3995: 3992: 3989: 3986: 3984: 3980: 3977: 3974: 3971: 3970: 3966: 3963: 3961: 3958: 3956: 3952: 3948: 3943: 3941: 3938: 3929: 3927: 3917: 3916: 3913: 3909: 3904: 3902: 3896: 3893: 3889: 3885: 3881: 3877: 3873: 3869: 3865: 3860: 3856: 3851: 3849: 3844: 3839: 3835: 3830: 3823: 3819: 3816: 3812: 3807: 3804: 3801: 3800: 3799: 3796: 3794: 3787: 3785: 3777: 3775: 3774: 3771: 3767: 3762: 3761: 3758: 3755: 3751: 3747: 3743: 3739: 3735: 3731: 3723: 3721: 3720: 3717: 3710: 3706: 3705: 3704: 3702: 3677: 3674: 3670: 3668: 3665: 3660: 3659: 3658: 3655: 3651: 3646: 3645: 3644: 3641: 3637: 3636: 3635: 3632: 3627: 3623: 3619: 3615: 3614: 3613: 3610: 3606: 3602: 3598: 3597: 3596: 3593: 3589: 3584: 3583: 3582: 3579: 3575: 3574: 3573: 3572: 3569: 3564: 3558: 3557: 3556: 3555: 3554: 3553: 3548: 3545: 3540: 3539: 3538: 3537: 3533: 3529: 3525: 3522: 3518: 3514: 3513: 3512: 3510: 3509:good articles 3499: 3496: 3493: 3490: 3487: 3484: 3481: 3480: 3477: 3474: 3471: 3469: 3466: 3463: 3460: 3459: 3455: 3452: 3449: 3446: 3443: 3440: 3438: 3435: 3434: 3430: 3427: 3424: 3421: 3418: 3415: 3413: 3410: 3409: 3405: 3402: 3399: 3396: 3393: 3390: 3388: 3385: 3384: 3380: 3377: 3374: 3371: 3368: 3365: 3363: 3360: 3359: 3355: 3352: 3349: 3346: 3343: 3340: 3338: 3335: 3334: 3330: 3327: 3324: 3321: 3318: 3315: 3313: 3310: 3309: 3305: 3302: 3299: 3296: 3293: 3290: 3288: 3287:Royal Society 3285: 3284: 3280: 3277: 3274: 3271: 3268: 3265: 3263: 3260: 3259: 3255: 3252: 3249: 3246: 3243: 3240: 3238: 3235: 3234: 3230: 3227: 3224: 3221: 3218: 3215: 3212: 3209: 3208: 3204: 3201: 3198: 3195: 3192: 3189: 3187: 3184: 3183: 3179: 3176: 3173: 3170: 3167: 3164: 3162: 3159: 3158: 3154: 3151: 3148: 3145: 3142: 3139: 3137: 3134: 3133: 3129: 3126: 3123: 3120: 3117: 3114: 3112: 3109: 3108: 3104: 3101: 3098: 3095: 3092: 3089: 3087: 3084: 3083: 3079: 3076: 3073: 3070: 3067: 3064: 3062: 3059: 3058: 3054: 3051: 3048: 3045: 3042: 3039: 3037: 3034: 3033: 3029: 3026: 3023: 3020: 3017: 3014: 3012: 3009: 3008: 3004: 3001: 2998: 2995: 2992: 2989: 2987: 2984: 2983: 2979: 2976: 2973: 2970: 2967: 2964: 2962: 2959: 2958: 2954: 2951: 2948: 2945: 2942: 2939: 2937: 2934: 2933: 2929: 2926: 2923: 2920: 2917: 2914: 2912: 2909: 2908: 2904: 2901: 2898: 2895: 2892: 2889: 2887: 2886:Kin selection 2884: 2883: 2879: 2876: 2873: 2870: 2867: 2864: 2862: 2859: 2858: 2854: 2851: 2848: 2845: 2842: 2839: 2837: 2836:Haber process 2834: 2833: 2829: 2826: 2823: 2820: 2817: 2814: 2812: 2809: 2808: 2804: 2801: 2798: 2795: 2792: 2789: 2786: 2783: 2782: 2778: 2775: 2772: 2769: 2766: 2763: 2761: 2758: 2757: 2753: 2750: 2747: 2744: 2741: 2738: 2736: 2733: 2732: 2728: 2725: 2722: 2719: 2716: 2713: 2711: 2708: 2707: 2703: 2700: 2697: 2694: 2691: 2688: 2686: 2683: 2682: 2678: 2675: 2672: 2669: 2666: 2663: 2661: 2658: 2657: 2653: 2650: 2647: 2644: 2641: 2638: 2636: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2625: 2622: 2619: 2616: 2613: 2611: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2600: 2597: 2594: 2591: 2588: 2586: 2583: 2582: 2578: 2575: 2572: 2569: 2566: 2563: 2561: 2558: 2557: 2553: 2550: 2547: 2544: 2541: 2538: 2536: 2533: 2532: 2528: 2525: 2522: 2519: 2516: 2513: 2511: 2508: 2507: 2503: 2500: 2497: 2494: 2491: 2488: 2486: 2483: 2482: 2478: 2475: 2472: 2469: 2466: 2463: 2461: 2458: 2457: 2453: 2450: 2447: 2444: 2441: 2438: 2436: 2433: 2432: 2428: 2425: 2422: 2419: 2416: 2413: 2411: 2408: 2407: 2403: 2400: 2397: 2394: 2391: 2388: 2387: 2378:Article name 2376: 2373: 2370: 2367: 2352: 2349: 2345: 2341: 2337: 2332: 2331: 2330: 2327: 2324: 2320: 2319: 2318: 2317: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2306: 2302: 2301: 2300: 2299: 2298: 2297: 2292: 2288: 2283: 2282: 2281: 2280: 2277: 2274: 2267: 2262: 2255: 2254: 2251: 2248: 2243: 2242: 2241: 2240: 2237: 2229: 2227: 2225: 2218: 2214: 2210: 2207: 2203: 2199: 2196: 2192: 2191: 2190: 2185: 2182: 2180: 2177: 2175: 2172: 2170: 2167: 2166: 2165: 2158: 2155: 2154: 2152: 2148: 2145: 2143: 2140: 2138: 2135: 2133: 2130: 2129: 2127: 2123: 2120: 2119: 2117: 2113: 2110: 2109: 2107: 2103: 2100: 2099: 2097: 2096: 2095: 2092: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2081:64.134.40.134 2078: 2067: 2065: 2064: 2059: 2057: 2054:web site, in 2053: 2049: 2042: 2038: 2037: 2036: 2034: 2028: 2025: 2024: 2023: 2020: 2018: 2014: 2010: 2009: 1999: 1996: 1992: 1991: 1986: 1984: 1981: 1967: 1965: 1959: 1958: 1956: 1954: 1950: 1946: 1943: 1941: 1938: 1936: 1935:Aljazeera.net 1933: 1931: 1930:Business Week 1928: 1926: 1923: 1922: 1921: 1918: 1914: 1911: 1908: 1905: 1903: 1899: 1896: 1894: 1891: 1889: 1886: 1885: 1884: 1881: 1878: 1875: 1873: 1870: 1867: 1864: 1862: 1861: 1857: 1854: 1853: 1850: 1846: 1845: 1841: 1838: 1836: 1830: 1827: 1824: 1821: 1820: 1816: 1814: 1812:(1): 117–146. 1811: 1807: 1806: 1801: 1798:(June 2006). 1797: 1789: 1786: 1784: 1771: 1768: 1763: 1759: 1758: 1757: 1752: 1746: 1739: 1738: 1736: 1732: 1728: 1724: 1723: 1722: 1717: 1711: 1705: 1704: 1703: 1700: 1696: 1695: 1694: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1676: 1671: 1670: 1666: 1660: 1657: 1655: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1647: 1644: 1641: 1638: 1636: 1633: 1630: 1627: 1624: 1623: 1617: 1614: 1613: 1610: 1606: 1602: 1598: 1590: 1585: 1582: 1579: 1576: 1575: 1574: 1572: 1564: 1559: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1548: 1545: 1542: 1541: 1540: 1538: 1529: 1524: 1521: 1520: 1516: 1513: 1510: 1509: 1508: 1506: 1499: 1496: 1495: 1491: 1488: 1485: 1484: 1483: 1481: 1475: 1472: 1471: 1467: 1464: 1461: 1458: 1457: 1456: 1454: 1446: 1441: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1431: 1426: 1423: 1420: 1417: 1414: 1412: 1409: 1406: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1396: 1395: 1394: 1393: 1386: 1384: 1381: 1380: 1376: 1372: 1368: 1364: 1361: 1357: 1352: 1351: 1348: 1345: 1337: 1332: 1329: 1328: 1327: 1324: 1318: 1314: 1309: 1305: 1302: 1301: 1297: 1294: 1293: 1292: 1289: 1284: 1280: 1276: 1273: 1272: 1268: 1265: 1262: 1261: 1260: 1257: 1252: 1248: 1244: 1241: 1240: 1236: 1233: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1225: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1209: 1208: 1204: 1202: 1197: 1194: 1191: 1188: 1185: 1182: 1179: 1176: 1173: 1171: 1168: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1155: 1153: 1150: 1149: 1145: 1141: 1133: 1128: 1125: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1118: 1113: 1110: 1109: 1108: 1103: 1100: 1099: 1098: 1093: 1090: 1089: 1088: 1083: 1080: 1079: 1078: 1073: 1070: 1069: 1068: 1063: 1060: 1059: 1058: 1056: 1051: 1045: 1042: 1041: 1040: 1035: 1032: 1031: 1026: 1023: 1019: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 997: 996: 995: 994: 989: 986: 985: 984: 982: 975: 973: 968: 965: 962: 959: 956: 953: 950: 947: 944: 942: 941: 937: 934: 933: 932: 931: 924: 922: 917: 909: 905: 901: 896: 895: 892: 889: 885: 881: 877: 873: 868: 864: 861: 857: 853: 849: 845: 840: 836: 833: 829: 825: 821: 817: 812: 808: 805: 800: 796: 791: 786: 782: 778: 774: 770: 766: 761: 757: 754: 750: 747: 743: 739: 735: 731: 726: 722: 716: 700: 696: 691: 680: 676: 671: 660: 659: 658:Men's Fitness 654: 649: 638: 634: 629: 618: 614: 609: 598: 594: 589: 585: 582: 578: 575: 571: 568: 564: 560: 556: 552: 546: 542: 539: 534: 530: 525: 520: 516: 512: 508: 503: 499: 496: 491: 487: 482: 477: 473: 469: 468: 463: 458: 454: 451: 447: 444: 440: 436: 433:(4): 406–14. 432: 428: 423: 419: 415: 411: 407: 402: 398: 395: 390: 386: 382: 378: 374: 370: 366: 361: 357: 354: 350: 346: 342: 338: 333: 329: 326: 322: 319: 315: 311: 307: 303: 298: 294: 290: 286: 282: 277: 276: 274: 266: 260: 257: 253: 250: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 225: 224: 220: 214: 211: 207: 203: 199: 195: 191: 186: 185: 181: 179: 173: 164: 160: 147: 143: 137: 135: 127: 125: 119: 117: 112: 102: 94: 91: 87: 82: 80: 76: 72: 68: 64: 55: 51: 50: 47: 40: 33: 19: 18:Knowledge:EPR 5315: 5302: 5296: 5292: 5289: 5272: 5268: 5258: 5254: 5245:Edmund Evans 5239:Anne Lundin- 5226: 5219: 5213: 5206:Edmund Evans 5201: 5196: 5193: 5190: 5179: 5167: 5160: 5157: 5150: 5146: 5140: 5136:Fritz Muller 5133: 5126: 5122:Katie Holmes 5119: 5094: 5080: 5074: 5062: 5055: 5052: 5045: 5041: 5031:Encyclopedia 5011:Samuel Pepys 4946:encyclopedia 4939: 4926: 4920: 4908: 4903:The Guardian 4901: 4898: 4892:The Guardian 4891: 4887: 4865: 4850:) to 10/10 ( 4844:South Africa 4841: 4828: 4820: 4814: 4802: 4795: 4792: 4785: 4781: 4774: 4771: 4765: 4762: 4756: 4750: 4744: 4738: 4732: 4729: 4718: 4706: 4699: 4696: 4689: 4685: 4680: 4676: 4673: 4653: 4641: 4634: 4631: 4624: 4620: 4595: 4529:High-traffic 4523: 4511:Sandy Nairne 4506: 4490: 4473: 4456: 4443: 4430: 4417: 4404: 4392: 4382: 4369: 4363: 4351: 4344: 4341: 4334: 4330: 4305: 4296: 4290: 4275: 4263: 4256: 4253: 4246: 4242: 4231: 4224: 4214: 4210: 4206: 4199: 4183: 4180: 4173: 4170:Ore dressing 4162: 4158: 4151: 4141: 4136: 4134: 4127: 4118: 4107: 4095: 4087: 4078: 4054: 4041: 4032: 4023: 4011: 3993: 3987: 3978: 3972: 3964: 3960: 3944: 3935: 3923: 3905: 3897: 3852: 3831: 3827: 3798:References: 3797: 3789: 3783: 3781: 3763: 3746:good article 3727: 3713: 3707: 3700: 3698: 3649: 3621: 3617: 3600: 3587: 3559: 3531: 3505: 2435:Agent Orange 2404:Errors/word 2395:Errors/word 2371: 2365: 2363: 2343: 2335: 2233: 2223: 2222: 2216: 2188: 2163: 2093: 2075:— Preceding 2071: 2060: 2051: 2047: 2046: 2039: 2031: 2026: 2021: 2006: 2005: 1988: 1973:. Retrieved 1963: 1919: 1882: 1876: 1865: 1858: 1855: 1839: 1835: 1809: 1803: 1793: 1787: 1783: 1761: 1733:, 2007-03-17 1727:User:Piotrus 1689:, 2006-11-29 1680: 1645: 1639: 1631: 1625: 1616: 1594: 1569: 1534: 1502: 1498:Bill Clinton 1478: 1451: 1429: 1421: 1415: 1407: 1400: 1397: 1390: 1383: 1367:this version 1353: 1341: 1325: 1321: 1290: 1287: 1258: 1255: 1226: 1223: 1200: 1192: 1186: 1180: 1174: 1166: 1159: 1152: 1137: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1106: 1102:William Kidd 1096: 1086: 1076: 1066: 1054: 1052: 1048: 1038: 1012: 1000: 992: 980: 979: 971: 963: 957: 951: 945: 938: 935: 928: 921: 908:the original 903: 875: 871: 847: 843: 819: 815: 772: 768: 733: 729: 703:. Retrieved 699:cochrane.org 698: 682:. Retrieved 678: 662:. Retrieved 656: 640:. Retrieved 636: 620:. Retrieved 616: 600:. Retrieved 596: 554: 550: 514: 510: 474:(10): e210. 471: 465: 430: 426: 409: 405: 375:(4): 310–3. 372: 368: 343:(2): 135–9. 340: 336: 305: 301: 284: 280: 236: 232: 197: 193: 177: 167:(3 C, 124 P) 150:(10 C, 79 P) 131: 123: 95: 83: 62: 61: 5108:John Taylor 4971:Steve Reich 4952:) to 8/10 ( 4758:Ross Youngs 4710:December 16 4645:December 23 4592:punt (boat) 4502:Punt (boat) 4486:BBC Radio 1 4355:February 12 3967:(Fall 2005) 3754:violet/riga 3734:peer review 3673:Mr. Billion 3664:Mr. Billion 3312:Synchrotron 3231:0.00052659 3111:Nobel prize 2986:Mayr, Ernst 2955:0.00066622 2745:0.00074963 2710:Dirac, Paul 2535:Bethe, Hans 2398:Word count 2389:Word count 2381:Britannica 1987:James Bone 1869:14 December 1790:(June 2006) 1402:Denver Post 1371:LeadSongDog 1360:violet/riga 1344:violet/riga 1342:None yet. 597:youtube.com 5171:November 8 4912:October 24 4875:Elf-friend 4806:7 November 4540:Tony Blair 4439:Tony Blair 4267:27 October 3955:2006-08-04 3945:Jim Giles 3906:Note that 3809:review it. 3770:SupperBird 3764:Note that 3500:0.0035798 3491:0.0054106 3456:0.0012931 3431:0.0035778 3422:0.0042105 3406:0.0037879 3397:0.0040816 3381:0.0034072 3372:0.0021505 3356:0.0047978 3347:0.0068611 3331:0.0012579 3322:0.0025974 3306:0.0023015 3281:0.0093985 3247:0.0044964 3222:0.0014535 3196:0.0010604 3180:0.0044220 3171:0.0063425 3155:0.0043384 3146:0.0095847 3130:0.0024366 3121:0.0097800 3105:0.0056772 3096:0.0035907 3080:0.0038536 3046:0.0061256 3021:0.0065789 3005:0.0039841 2980:0.0056980 2971:0.0020877 2961:Lymphocyte 2946:0.0019305 2921:0.0085960 2905:0.0074257 2896:0.0032503 2880:0.0035149 2871:0.0047619 2855:0.0037665 2846:0.0041494 2821:0.0051020 2805:0.0019004 2796:0.0095238 2779:0.0085106 2754:0.0049566 2729:0.0086207 2704:0.0066964 2695:0.0053476 2679:0.0029603 2670:0.0046802 2654:0.0036417 2645:0.0033841 2604:0.0017841 2595:0.0050761 2554:0.0010971 2545:0.0015198 2529:0.0020161 2520:0.0042553 2504:0.0032949 2495:0.0057143 2479:0.0045455 2454:0.0015748 2384:Knowledge 2122:Paul Dirac 2108:11 errors 2098:19 errors 2017:Britannica 1975:2006-03-23 1635:2006-11-06 1609:AnonEMouse 1411:2007-05-01 1313:Britannica 1279:Britannica 1215:Britannica 1034:Sand Creek 271:See also: 5021:Bob Dylan 4954:Bob Dylan 4862:Responses 4520:Responses 4413:Kate Moss 4326:Responses 4238:Responses 4221:Shoutwire 4091:Shoutwire 4082:Shoutwire 3951:Wikimania 3940:(archive) 3297:0.014423 3272:0.012766 3136:Pheromone 3071:0.010989 3055:0.016755 3030:0.010676 3011:Meliaceae 2770:0.028090 2720:0.011947 2620:0.010959 2570:0.019268 2470:0.030769 2429:0.016787 2153:5 errors 2128:7 errors 2118:9 errors 2013:Knowledge 2011:compared 1995:The Times 1940:USA Today 1760:Hardly a 1605:Evolution 1558:Evolution 1177:June 2007 1140:Mangostar 749:0028-4793 570:0098-6151 446:1544-3191 259:150237156 252:1351-8046 213:0021-9584 79:Knowledge 5345:Category 5320:See also 5312:Findings 5264:Response 5234:Findings 5187:Findings 5128:rights." 5114:and the 5091:Findings 5001:TS Eliot 4936:Findings 4838:Findings 4726:Findings 4670:Findings 4600:Thruston 4379:Findings 4285:Findings 4212:present. 4198:(Grade: 4150:(Grade: 4137:accurate 4126:(Grade: 4115:Findings 4020:Informal 4008:Findings 3912:Simongar 3640:Nunh-huh 3618:excluded 3609:Nunh-huh 3578:Nunh-huh 3544:Nunh-huh 3532:excluded 3061:Mutation 2830:0.00322 2445:0.00793 2077:unsigned 2068:Findings 1998:March 25 1953:Wikinews 1925:BBC News 1817:Findings 1677:Response 1667:Findings 1591:Response 1535:Retired 1434:Findings 1338:Response 1326:Quotes: 1291:Quotes: 1259:Quotes: 1227:Quotes: 1205:Findings 1134:Response 1005:Badlands 988:Badlands 981:Summary: 976:Findings 891:28139458 863:27866956 835:25665960 816:Vaccines 807:25250889 769:PLOS ONE 756:24963564 715:cite web 637:time.com 584:40519767 577:24778001 541:24864148 498:24103318 453:25063262 397:22022226 356:20646799 321:19017825 267:Medicine 120:Academic 46:Shortcut 5299:Ongoing 5290:Source: 5158:Source: 5053:Source: 4899:Source: 4793:Source: 4697:Source: 4632:Source: 4342:Source: 4254:Source: 4223:(Grade: 4099:March 7 4088:Source: 4046:July 13 4001:CIKM'05 3973:Source: 3892:Thyroid 3876:Epitaxy 3872:Colloid 3744:, have 3738:Ethanol 3517:Firefox 3497:3.8571 3494:1077.5 3488:2.9286 3485:541.26 3337:Thyroid 2785:Ethanol 2760:Epitaxy 2685:Colloid 2579:0.0157 2401:Errors 2392:Errors 2224:Update: 2215:, told 2157:Ethanol 2147:Thyroid 1856:Source: 1737:06:07z 1731:Jeandré 1699:Circeus 1693:08:10z 1687:Jeandré 1626:Source: 1398:Source: 1317:Encarta 1251:Encarta 1219:Encarta 1167:Source: 936:Source: 799:4174509 777:Bibcode 705:23 June 617:bbc.com 533:4016830 517:: 1–4. 490:3929050 389:3193353 328:2072846 221:History 182:Science 5277:": --> 5214:Expert 5180:Title: 5075:Title: 5066:July 1 4921:Title: 4815:Title: 4719:Title: 4662:URI - 4654:Title: 4388:Muslim 4364:Title: 4276:Title: 4196:Nickel 4108:Title: 4033:Source 3988:Title: 3784:Nature 3701:Nature 3650:Nature 3601:Nature 3588:Update 3527:noted. 3472:45254 3464:22733 3461:Total 2420:0.002 2366:Nature 2344:Nature 2336:Nature 2217:Nature 2052:Nature 2048:Update 2008:Nature 1964:Nature 1877:Title: 1860:Nature 1840:Nature 1762:useful 1741:EPR.-- 1640:Title: 1416:Title: 1187:Title: 1181:Issue: 1170:PC Pro 958:Title: 952:Issue: 918:Formal 684:4 June 664:4 June 642:4 June 622:4 June 602:4 June 134:WP:W2J 54:WP:EPR 5297:Date: 5168:Date: 5063:Date: 4909:Date: 4803:Date: 4707:Date: 4642:Date: 4604:Telsa 4573:David 4558:Arwel 4545:David 4352:Date: 4264:Date: 4096:Date: 4055:Title 3994:URLs: 3981:Fall 3979:Date: 3888:Prion 3620:from 3482:Mean 3450:2320 3400:1320 3375:1174 3350:1459 3325:1590 3250:2060 3241:1112 3237:Quark 3225:1899 3199:1265 3174:1583 3161:Prion 3124:2052 3099:1233 3074:1557 3049:1134 3040:1306 2949:1501 2911:Lipid 2799:2631 2739:1334 2735:Dolly 2723:1044 2673:1689 2660:Cloud 2648:1373 2598:1121 2548:1823 2448:1270 2184:Quark 2174:Lipid 2142:Prion 1969:(PDF) 1909:(doc) 1883:URLs: 1866:Date: 1750:talk 1715:talk 1685:. -- 1646:URLs: 1632:Date: 1601:China 1523:Islam 1474:China 1408:Date: 1354:With 1175:Date: 946:Date: 581:S2CID 325:S2CID 256:S2CID 65:is a 5303:URL: 5279:edit 5227:Date 5175:2004 5070:2005 4927:URL: 4916:2005 4854:and 4821:URL: 4810:2005 4714:2005 4649:2005 4577:Talk 4562:talk 4549:Talk 4370:URL: 4359:2006 4271:2006 4103:2007 4050:2007 4042:Date 3983:2005 3750:here 3740:and 3607:. - 3521:Unix 3475:162 3467:123 3441:873 3425:559 3416:475 3391:245 3366:930 3341:583 3316:770 3300:869 3291:416 3275:532 3266:235 3216:688 3190:943 3165:473 3149:461 3140:313 3115:409 3090:557 3065:728 3024:281 3015:152 2999:753 2990:357 2974:351 2965:479 2940:518 2924:676 2915:349 2899:404 2890:923 2874:569 2865:210 2849:531 2840:241 2824:933 2815:588 2790:315 2773:235 2764:178 2748:807 2714:837 2698:896 2689:561 2664:641 2639:591 2623:417 2614:365 2589:394 2564:519 2539:658 2523:496 2514:235 2498:607 2489:350 2473:660 2464:130 2439:252 2423:417 2414:500 2323:+sj 2204:and 2085:talk 2015:and 2000:2006 1872:2005 1422:URL: 1375:talk 1193:URL: 1144:talk 1022:(♫♫) 1007:and 964:URL: 948:2008 888:PMID 860:PMID 832:PMID 804:PMID 753:PMID 746:ISSN 721:link 707:2014 686:2014 666:2014 644:2014 624:2014 604:2014 574:PMID 567:ISSN 538:PMID 515:2014 495:PMID 450:PMID 443:ISSN 394:PMID 353:PMID 318:PMID 249:ISSN 210:ISSN 73:and 5081:URL 4956:). 4858:). 4611:(c) 4608:(t) 4128:A++ 4057:: " 3953:on 3949:at 3886:, 3757:(t) 3622:all 3052:19 2717:10 2635:CJD 2576:11 2567:10 1993:in 1363:(t) 1347:(t) 1013:did 1001:did 880:doi 852:doi 824:doi 795:PMC 785:doi 738:doi 734:370 559:doi 555:114 529:PMC 519:doi 486:PMC 476:doi 435:doi 414:doi 385:PMC 377:doi 345:doi 310:doi 289:doi 285:205 241:doi 202:doi 5347:: 5173:, 5083:- 5068:, 5035:5 5025:8 5015:6 5005:6 4995:7 4985:0 4975:7 4914:, 4808:, 4712:, 4647:, 4613:) 4598:. 4575:| 4564:) 4547:| 4534:. 4532:}} 4526:{{ 4509:- 4493:- 4476:- 4459:- 4357:, 4306:We 4269:, 4225:B+ 4200:B- 4176:): 4174:D- 4154:): 4152:C- 4130:): 4101:, 4048:, 4044:: 4035:: 3957:. 3942:. 3890:, 3882:, 3878:, 3874:, 3870:, 3866:, 3524:wc 3453:3 3447:0 3444:0 3428:2 3419:2 3403:5 3394:1 3378:4 3369:2 3353:7 3344:4 3328:2 3319:2 3303:2 3294:6 3278:5 3269:3 3256:0 3253:0 3244:5 3228:1 3219:1 3213:* 3205:0 3202:0 3193:1 3177:7 3168:3 3152:2 3143:3 3127:5 3118:4 3102:7 3093:2 3077:6 3068:8 3043:8 3027:3 3018:1 3002:3 2996:0 2993:0 2977:2 2968:1 2952:1 2943:1 2930:0 2927:0 2918:3 2902:3 2893:3 2877:2 2868:1 2852:2 2843:1 2827:3 2818:3 2802:5 2793:3 2787:* 2776:2 2767:5 2751:4 2742:1 2726:9 2701:6 2692:3 2676:5 2667:3 2651:5 2642:2 2629:0 2626:0 2617:4 2601:2 2592:2 2551:2 2542:1 2526:1 2517:1 2501:2 2492:2 2476:3 2467:4 2451:2 2442:2 2426:7 2417:1 2260:ᓛᖁ 2087:) 1810:93 1808:. 1802:. 1571:CU 1537:CU 1377:) 1315:- 1311:- 1281:- 1277:- 1249:- 1245:- 1217:- 1213:- 1146:) 902:. 886:. 876:57 874:. 858:. 848:57 846:. 830:. 820:17 818:. 802:. 793:. 783:. 771:. 767:. 751:. 744:. 732:. 717:}} 713:{{ 697:. 677:. 655:. 635:. 615:. 595:. 579:. 572:. 565:. 553:. 536:. 527:. 513:. 509:. 493:. 484:. 472:15 470:. 464:. 448:. 441:. 431:54 429:. 408:. 392:. 383:. 373:99 371:. 367:. 351:. 341:31 339:. 323:. 316:. 306:42 304:. 283:. 254:. 247:. 237:31 235:. 231:. 208:. 198:94 196:. 192:. 165:‎ 148:‎ 136:. 116:. 114:}} 108:{{ 104:}} 98:{{ 35:}} 29:{{ 5283:] 5251:) 4606:( 4560:( 4227:) 4202:) 4061:" 4003:) 3586:( 2334:( 2326:+ 2272:ᑐ 2258:‣ 2197:; 2083:( 2033:I 1978:. 1966:" 1747:| 1735:t 1712:| 1691:t 1373:( 1142:( 893:. 882:: 865:. 854:: 837:. 826:: 809:. 787:: 779:: 773:9 758:. 740:: 723:) 709:. 688:. 668:. 646:. 626:. 606:. 586:. 561:: 543:. 521:: 500:. 478:: 455:. 437:: 420:. 416:: 410:3 399:. 379:: 358:. 347:: 330:. 312:: 295:. 291:: 261:. 243:: 215:. 204:: 41:. 20:)

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

Knowledge

:External peer review - Knowledge

Index