108:. That is an incredible amount (most users would not spend that amount of time and edit in an article, not even when self created), and it is good to see you have made it a good one. In 10 different articles you have spent 100 edits or more, and they account for 1820 edits, or 35% of your edits in the mainspace. I can make two conclusions: you are a perfectionist in topics that you do like and enjoy, but that you appear to be limited exclusively in those topics. Note that this is not something bad, I personally spend a lot of time in fantasy articles, and would be bored if I were to write about Argentinian politics. I guess you have already noticed that, though!
241:. These had been reviewed by multiple users, and are considered to have the exact wording for different situations, welcoming until it is not possible to assume good faith, and increasing their tone until it is obvious they will not stop. Gather experience in both areas, and you should have no problems with a future RFA. You have already proven yourself as a very good editor, now you only need to demonstrate your capabilities to handle vandals and judge articles that require administrator help. Good luck! --
293:. I believe that these articles will provide Knowledge readers with the unbiased, objective and accurate information they are seeking. I made sure that every piece of information is referenced in manner that assures our readers that Knowledge is a source they can trust. My goal for the use of in-line citations is to enable the readers of my articles to re-trace much of my research. I am also pleased with the templates I have created to ease navigation among the many articles pertaining to American society.
82:·'s review: based on your relative calm under intense pressure in the American (ethnic group) conflict from a couple months ago, and judging from your other contributions, I would happily support your RFA. You kept a relatively level head when an editor was essentially attacking your heritage for no reason other than spite over and over. Grace under pressure is possibly the most crucial quality for an effective editor.
306:
to the administrators. I believe that
Knowledge ought to be a civil place where editors comment on issues not each other-I have made a successful effort to always remain civil and keep the focus of discussions on the issues. I should perhaps also mention, that I do make a habit of warning (and tracing the contributions of) vandals and reporting them to the admins.
305:
Yes, I have been involved in my fair share of conflicts. Perhaps, this is due to my interest and involvement in issues that may be seen as controversial. I also try to keep an open mind and try to learn from the criticism of others. I have, however, encountered some individuals whom I had to report
232:
I believe you are an excellent editor, but are still learning the ways of the admin tasks. Administrators spend less time in articles and more in other tasks, and would be a pity to "lose" such a good editor. However, if it is your decision, I suggest to spend more time in deletion discussions, to
130:
I divide administrators in two classes: those working with articles and those working with people. The ones taking care of articles close AFD discussions, delete speedy tagged elements, protect articles, etc. However, your participation in AFDs is pretty small, just 5 during
October, and although
92:
First of all, checking your user page I notice several things: You have had a very good participation creating articles and taking them into Good article status. Also, the fact that you had spent time expanding articles means that you have the community sense that is needed in editors and
115:
can be someone else. If you did not create the account, nor activate an email nor remember its password, why you would redirect it to your own page? Until a username purge is ran, I believe it is safe to assume someone else registered the account but never used it. Also, there are still
46:) In the near future I would like to run for adminship. Additionally I would also like to know how I am doing and will appreciate any input you might have. If you beleive I could be doing something better, please let me know so I can make the according improvements. Thank you.
96:
However, I also notice in your user page a good amount of editcountitis. Personally, I don't really have problems with that, but some editors may consider that you spend a good amount of your time gathering statistics of yourself (especially because of
175:
with a pretty harsh warning that gave no advice as to where to test (as we should assume good faith, we could think he was testing this "wiki" thing, and considering it was his only contribution, leading him to the sandbox or by using a
214:. He was warned on September 15, September 19 and October 26, yet you pointed out that it was his third warning. This may mislead him to believe that warnings are accumulative over time, which is not true.
124:
with your current one. Although it is not necessary, it will be useful for people to learn how you have modified your userpage (even if they might be used by those who don't like editcountitis).
227:
message to feel him welcomed. Some may realize they had been wrong and change their behaviour, while others will know the community acknowledge their efforts and actively join our encyclopedia.
217:
It is good to see you have congratulated 70.108.251.128 for his contributions! I would suggest that everytime you post a first message in an IP, being it a warning or a congratulation, use the
160:
301:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
87:
Hello there, BrendelSignature. Here are some thoughts I hope you will find useful. I will consider your last 5,000 edits, which cover your last 5 months at
Knowledge.
238:
127:
I like the fact you have contributed many free images. Some may be moved by commons administrators there someday, which will help the whole
Knowledge project.
286:
159:, which is one of the means to contact these administrators. As for the other class, the ones focused on user interaction, you have only one edit at
156:
43:
278:
136:
260:
120:
old signatures around, you can change them to your current one if you want. Finally, you should request an administrator to merge
132:
234:
164:
277:
I am particularly pleased with the articles I have written pertaining to socio-economic issues in the United States, such as
98:
93:
administrators, where nobody owns articles and, at the same time, everybody shares the responsibility of improving them.
290:
37:
101:). I remember seeing people oppose nominations because the candidate had changed his editcountitis box very often.
17:
282:
53:
48:
33:
27:
273:
Of your contributions to
Knowledge, are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
131:
more in
September, most of your edits were in a single AFD. Participating in these discussions (and
245:
56:
112:
221:
117:
76:
186:
would have been enough). When I say harsh, I mean that it is the equivalent to giving him a
105:
204:
190:
163:, and although there appears to be a good amount of user talk, you are not focused on
242:
180:
69:
144:
140:
152:
104:
A quick review of your statistics indicates you have spent over 400 edits in
210:), and only edit in the day from that IP, was answered with a pretty hard
148:
211:
197:
172:
168:
121:
111:
I am a bit curious about your usernames. As explained,
161:
Knowledge:Administrator intervention against vandalism
200:
edit, which can be considered misinformation (like a
139:) will help others to learn which judgement (
8:
155:, etc) you apply. You don't have reports at
287:Educational attainment in the United States
171:reversion of an apparent harmless test was
157:Knowledge:Requests for page protection
279:Household income in the United States
99:Image:My edits as of October 2006.jpg
7:
259:View this user's edit count using
24:
237:, and learn to use the different
261:Interiot's 'Wannabe Kate' Tool
1:
246:19:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)
57:05:43, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
324:
291:Crime in the United States
122:your old User page history
18:Knowledge:Editor review
283:American middle class
235:recent changes patrol
28:User:BrendelSignature
239:template warnings
315:
226:
220:
209:
203:
195:
189:
185:
179:
106:Lincoln Town Car
79:
72:
51:
34:BrendelSignature
323:
322:
318:
317:
316:
314:
313:
312:
224:
218:
207:
201:
196:warning. Also,
193:
187:
183:
177:
77:
70:
49:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
321:
319:
311:
310:
309:
308:
299:
297:
296:
295:
265:
264:
251:
250:
249:
248:
230:
229:
228:
215:
128:
125:
109:
102:
94:
84:
83:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
320:
307:
303:
302:
300:
298:
294:
292:
288:
284:
280:
275:
274:
272:
271:
270:
269:
262:
258:
257:
256:
255:
247:
244:
240:
236:
231:
223:
216:
213:
206:
199:
192:
182:
174:
170:
166:
162:
158:
154:
153:m:deletionist
150:
146:
142:
138:
134:
129:
126:
123:
119:
114:
110:
107:
103:
100:
95:
91:
90:
89:
88:
86:
85:
81:
80:
74:
73:
71:j e r s y k o
66:
65:
64:
63:
59:
58:
55:
54:
52:
45:
42:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
304:
276:
267:
266:
253:
252:
145:exclusionist
141:inclusionist
113:User:Brendel
75:
68:
61:
60:
47:
40:
32:
165:patrolling
137:categories
268:Questions
254:Comments
233:join the
222:welcomeip
133:templates
50:Signature
243:ReyBrujo
173:answered
62:Reviews
44:contribs
212:warning
149:mergist
205:verror
191:test3
16:<
289:and
198:this
181:test
169:This
135:and
118:some
78:talk
38:talk
151:or
143:or
285:,
281:,
225:}}
219:{{
208:}}
202:{{
194:}}
188:{{
184:}}
178:{{
167:.
147:,
67:·
263:.
41:·
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.