341:
that a self-nom 5 months into editing is a so-so thing to do, but the proof of the pudding is in the eating, and you have vindicated the trust that 22 presumably close observers (including
Nichalp) had in you -- the votes of so many admins ought to make you feel better about the turnout, since they what what is about to be handed to you. Think no more of it, be assured that you are doing well, and take some advise, don't neglect your board exams, which I calculate should be coming up soon. Knowledge (XXG) may not give you cancer, but all addictions are bad, and this one can mess you up badly.
460:
451:
482:
473:
283:
Don't knock yourself for being less and less active - give roughly 3 hours to WP on
Saturday or Sunday, and use it to relieve stress of your studies and exams. Don't let WP add to the main stress factor - don't feel down over WP. Do stuff you enjoy most. Adminship is a responsibility, but in 3 hours,
330:
Hi
Shreshth, as my observation has already been linked in the ER self-nom and as I felt that there is nothing more substantial that I could add, I did not comment. However since you wanted me to comment, let me say this - I agree with the comments of NobleEagle and Rama's Arrow first and foremost. I
340:
I think you are doing great both as admin and editor. Very restrained, going by the admin actions you have taken, especially if you are only about 15 now! And the fact that you are seeking this review says much for introspection (apart from being perfectly charming!). I may have thought in
December
366:
Like others have said, you still are a great editor and admin. As is the case with me, school is taking priority. A suggestion is that you should edit more school-related articles rather than your interests. This means expanding on Maths and science pages instead of famous
Indians! IMO, writing
293:
Excellent advice... focus on exams and studying and for a break come to WP. And if you have to limit your time on WP, then you have to limit your time for WP. Like Nirav said, focus on a couple of admin related tasks that you enjoy. This doesn't reflect on your adminship in the least --
162:
Probably you are in exam bluesĀ :) You are a great contributor, and a great quizzer, too. I do not see any reason why people should again review you once they have shown their confidence. You do not seem to have done anything unpardonable in the mean time!
503:
331:
believe that your performance has been exemplary and I don't think you need to seek reassurances from the community. If you slip up or if your teenage hormones go on a rageĀ ;), we are all there to pull you back. So, no worries. --
284:
an admin can do a good amount of work fighting vandalism and on AfDs. Focus on 1-2 tasks and don't concern yourself with other issues that will only use-up valuable brainspace. Cheers - I'm on bit of a reorganization myself.
454:
46:) I've been an admin since December 3 2005, and I thought I'd reconfirm what the community thinks of me. In my early days, I was naive, and I created a copyvio Lyrics - Songs about Jane, and
398:
310:
Great user and editor. Your contributions have been excellent and your actions in the past can be condoned. I see
Shreshth on IRC often and my interactions with him are positive. --
499:
Have you been in any conflicts over editing in the past or do you feel other users have caused you stress? How have you dealt with it and how will you deal with it in the future?
502:
I have always tried to maintain a certain amount of decorum. Earlier, I used to take many things to heart. I would say the closest I have got to a full out debate was
288:
85:
209:
RfA is NOT a popularity contest, so it shouldn't affect you. psst, other editors are jealous of the maturity at your age and hence did not vote for you.Ā ;-) --
69:, but my actions were supported. Since then, I have tried to be civil, though if I may have failed, I apologize. In capacity as an admin, I have deleted over
117:
Thank you everybody for all your useful and reassuring comments and suggestions. I will try to implement all your suggestions. Thanks you, and cheers!
350:
Keep up the good work! Still waiting for a FA from yourside though. A little more activity in RFAs, FACs, PRs and AFDs could be beneficial.
43:
389:
303:
429:
Of your articles or contributions to
Knowledge (XXG), are there any about which you are particularly pleased, and why?
84:
I have over 5000 edits over 1 yr, mainly in main (1710), user talk (1260) and project (805)namespaces. Please also see
463:
17:
299:
253:
224:
191:
125:
94:
433:
61:). After I became an admin, I should have been blocked for violating 3RR (if the current rules were in force)
295:
249:
393:
62:
314:
467:
445:
322:
152:
319:
311:
507:
441:
273:
229:
196:
168:
130:
99:
37:
397:(Warning:Both tools have stopped updating and the edit counts are way off. Please consider using
285:
248:
Superstar. Too good for a review. I'm nearly twice his age yet don't have half his wisdom. --
374:
356:
54:. I would have thought my age (14 years) would go against me, but some people consider it OK (
476:
149:
489:
417:
377:
361:
345:
335:
325:
278:
257:
235:
213:
204:
182:
172:
157:
136:
110:
66:
332:
264:
221:
210:
188:
164:
122:
91:
33:
27:
262:
I don't understand why you are going for a review...could you please go over that again.
181:
But even then I had got only 22 votes, which was very few then; what to say of now, when
410:
342:
510:
and other forums, despite which I may have erred at some time, for which I cry pardon.
485:
437:
367:
about on WP will make the information easier to remember! Just my two cents though.
59:
57:
55:
459:
450:
368:
351:
51:
481:
472:
504:
Knowledge (XXG):Articles for deletion/List of men famous for being well endowed
402:
414:
455:
Fundamental Rights, Directive
Principles and Fundamental Duties of India
148:
Age doesn't matter - judgement does. Your contributions are amazing.
506:. I have tried to respond calmly and courteously to all messages on
436:. I have created over 50 articles and of them I am most proud of
65:
BORED 4 times in a very short time, and the matter went to
78:
74:
70:
47:
444:. Of the other articles I have edited considerably to
390:See this user's edit history with Interiot's tool
86:Knowledge (XXG):Requests for adminship/Shreshth91
8:
185:has been breached and 300 soon to be.--
7:
488:have featured on the Main Page as
24:
480:
471:
458:
449:
470:stand out. Two of my articles
1:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Editor review
220:May the Force be with you!
187:May the Force be with you!
121:May the Force be with you!
90:May the Force be with you!
464:Fundamental Rights in India
48:some book review like edits
527:
409:Hi Shreshth91, here's the
418:19:01, 29 June 2006 (UTC)
378:10:38, 19 June 2006 (UTC)
236:17:08, 26 June 2006 (UTC)
362:01:28, 9 June 2006 (UTC)
346:14:59, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
336:09:41, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
326:08:48, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
304:21:14, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
289:20:47, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
279:00:48, 4 June 2006 (UTC)
258:19:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
214:09:42, 7 June 2006 (UTC)
205:18:32, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
173:18:27, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
158:17:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
137:20:42, 1 July 2006 (UTC)
111:17:30, 3 June 2006 (UTC)
218:Were you one of them?--
468:Major Rivers of India
446:Constitution of India
442:Battle for Carvahall
411:ITIS User Statistics
394:edit summary usage
403:Interiot's Tool 2
399:Flcelloguy's Tool
302:
256:
201:
107:
518:
484:
477:Takht-i-Jahangir
475:
462:
453:
359:
354:
317:
298:
276:
270:
267:
252:
234:
227:
203:
200:
194:
155:
135:
128:
109:
106:
103:
97:
526:
525:
521:
520:
519:
517:
516:
515:
413:you requested.
357:
352:
315:
274:
268:
265:
225:
219:
192:
186:
153:
126:
120:
104:
95:
89:
31:
28:User:Shreshth91
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
524:
522:
514:
513:
512:
511:
496:
495:
494:
493:
432:Please see my
421:
420:
407:
381:
380:
364:
348:
338:
328:
308:
307:
306:
281:
260:
245:
244:
243:
242:
241:
240:
239:
238:
176:
175:
160:
140:
139:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
523:
509:
505:
501:
500:
498:
497:
491:
487:
486:Prasoon Joshi
483:
478:
474:
469:
465:
461:
456:
452:
447:
443:
439:
438:Proby Cautley
435:
431:
430:
428:
427:
426:
425:
419:
416:
412:
408:
406:
404:
400:
395:
391:
388:
387:
386:
385:
379:
376:
375:
372:
371:
365:
363:
360:
355:
349:
347:
344:
339:
337:
334:
329:
327:
324:
321:
318:
313:
309:
305:
301:
297:
292:
291:
290:
287:
282:
280:
277:
272:
271:
261:
259:
255:
251:
247:
246:
237:
233:
231:
228:
223:
217:
216:
215:
212:
208:
207:
206:
202:
198:
195:
190:
184:
180:
179:
178:
177:
174:
170:
166:
161:
159:
156:
151:
147:
146:
145:
144:
138:
134:
132:
129:
124:
118:
115:
114:
113:
112:
108:
101:
98:
93:
87:
82:
80:
76:
72:
68:
64:
60:
58:
56:
53:
49:
45:
42:
39:
35:
29:
26:
19:
508:my talk page
423:
422:
396:
383:
382:
373:
369:
286:Rama's Arrow
263:
232:
199:
142:
141:
133:
116:
102:
83:
71:400 articles
52:Blink (book)
40:
32:
150:Computerjoe
105:(review me)
75:20 protects
333:Gurubrahma
211:Gurubrahma
163:Regards.--
79:few blocks
34:Shreshth91
424:Questions
384:Comments
343:ImpuMozhi
165:Dwaipayan
73:, around
434:braglist
353:=Nichalp
143:Reviews
77:, and a
63:deleting
44:contribs
358:Ā«TalkĀ»=
154:'s talk
275:(Talk)
230:shth91
197:shth91
183:WP:200
131:shth91
100:shth91
67:WP:DRV
370:Gizza
323:e Ong
296:Samir
269:eagle
266:Noble
250:Samir
16:<
490:DYKs
479:and
466:and
415:Icey
392:and
300:ą¤§ą¤°ą„ą¤®
254:ą¤§ą¤°ą„ą¤®
169:talk
38:talk
401:or
312:Ter
222:Shr
189:Shr
123:Shr
92:Shr
88:.--
50:to
457:,
448:,
440:,
320:nc
171:)
119:--
81:.
492:.
405:)
316:e
226:e
193:e
167:(
127:e
96:e
41:Ā·
36:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.