941:, since I'll take it in good faith that the MOSNUM problem will be fixed -- it's the only substantive thing left, IMHO. The article is well-written, comprehensive, and easy to understand even for someone with a limited grasp of F1 racing. You've done a good job, and the fact that this article has been through so many rounds of review shows that it should be promoted.
252:: I supported the last FAC, and have conducted a peer review on the article in the past. This is a comprehensive, well-written and referenced article. Previous FAC nominations have failed, as Midgrid says, from a lack of comments, rather than any outstanding problems with the article, and I think it deserves to be passed.
922:
Commprehensive, well written coverage of the race, fully in compliance with MoS and WP:F1 guidance. A couple of minor points to think about: the second, third and fourth paras of background, while valid here, would make more sense for me in the overarching season article as they have little direct
401:
annual; it contains the race, qualifying and practice times, a lap chart, and other information, so I have naturally used it as a reference for whenever I have mentioned specific times or laps when something happened. I have another annual which contains the same information - should I double all
365:
I've given the article a quick copy edit, but because I'm not as familiar with the subject as you are, and especially because I'm not as familiar with the conventions of
British English, I'd appreciate it if you'd look over my changes to see if there's anything I've screwed up too badly. From that
846:
Not that I know of; I just think that it's not reported because it doesn't really matter. The only exception I can think of was the 2006(?) Turkish Grand Prix, when one of the trophies was presented by the
President of Northern Cyprus, and the organisers were given a hefty fine for breaching the
753:
The article isn't consistent in its presentation of ordinal numbers greater than 10th. In parts, it spells them out (tenth, sixteenth, etc.) while in others, it uses numerals. MOSNUM says to use numerals, but I'd be happy with either, as long as it's consistent. The biggest switch seems to happen
822:
or more like a bundle of questions: is there a policy against naming dignitaries who hand over the trophies at sports events (I checked a couple of other F1 articles and found no mention), or is the lack of mention down to lack of sources, or lack of focus? There certainly don't seem to be many
189:
I am nominating this for featured article because I believe it meets the criteria. Since its last nomination, the article has undergone a further peer review. The previous two nominations have suffered from a general lack of comments and opinions, so all contributions to this nomination are
538:"with a view to giving the system its race debut later in the year"; if they actually did use it, you could phrase this: "ahead of the system's race debut later in the year". As it is, that text says to me that they only anticipated doing so, not that they actually did.
680:
All F1 races are internationally televised in several languages, there is no primary commentator nor exclusive broadcasting rights for subscriber channels: it's like the World Cup or
Olympics. The precise arrangement is probably something for the mother F1 article.
658:
indeed lists start times, but I see that that was the first year in which there was a night race, and then already only 8 out of 18 races started at 14:00 local time. So I change my opinion and agree that start time could be indicated in the article.
391:
The article seems to lean on that first citation pretty heavily. Is there another source you could use for at least some of those? Since it's a sporting event, are there accounts of the race that could replace or at least buttress that first
641:(I'm a reviewer but reply anyway) At the time, almost all F1 races started at 14:00 local time, and since the Hungaroring races also start at this default time, this is probably something for the mother article of the 2008 F1 season. --
128:
123:
118:
361:
Nice work keeping up with this. Having had an article turned down at FAC before, I know how tough it is to stay motivated and come back for another go. Doing it for the third time with the same article earns you kudos in my
483:
When talking about how teams were limited in testing from the previous year, did that effect their preparation for the HGP? If not, that seems like information better suited for the parent article about the racing
333:– Reviewed this at the last FAC and all of my comments were addressed. I took a look at the changes made since then, and didn't see anything to comment about. Seems to meet the criteria to me.
804:
That's it from me. The article's pretty clean, and most of the stuff I found was fairly nit-picky. Drop a note on my talk page if you have any questions, comments, or concerns, and good luck!
490:
434:
I've used the new reference as an additional citation for the information in the infobox, the qualifying and race result tables, and the "standings after the race" tables. Is that alright?--
513:"On the day before the first free practice sessions took place" is this July 21, or does "free practice" mean something different than the "testing" referenced previously in that section?
563:
Under practice and qualifying, I suggest spelling out the first time (1 minute and 20.981 seconds) in order to establish the units you're using in the abbreviated times that follow.
458:
Given the length of the sections under the third-level headers in the report section, have you considered promoting those to second-level headers and simply deleting "Report"?
518:"Free practice" refers to the three timed sessions that occur during the event, before qualifying and the race, so the date is July 31. I've clarified this in the article.--
88:
83:
40:
923:
impact on the race; You might need to explain that drivers and teams have to make a tactical decision on how much fuel to qualify with in the final session.
92:
75:
30:
17:
145:
968:
950:
932:
910:
896:
878:
860:
840:
813:
797:
772:
740:
722:
708:
690:
668:
650:
631:
606:
581:
556:
531:
506:
476:
447:
429:
415:
384:
348:
323:
304:
283:
265:
243:
221:
203:
181:
463:
I would prefer to keep it as it is already, in order to keep it consistent with other F1 race articles that have already reached FA status.--
150:
79:
713:
Gotcha. Still, even a sentence saying that it was broadcast per the standard F1 television formula would be helpful.
613:"Ferrari used an additional set of Soft tyres to McLaren"; is this a quirk of British English? I don't understand it.
71:
64:
828:
827:
handed the award to race winner
Kovalainen; I found a full list of the four trophy presenters only in English
655:
964:
906:
836:
704:
686:
664:
646:
300:
279:
212:
I conducted the last Peer review. Tightened it up a bit more, nothing wrong with the article a worthy FA
946:
809:
718:
425:
342:
259:
677:
Was the race televised, and if so, by whom and who were the commentators for the primary broadcast?
588:
In the
Hamilton qualifying paragraph, there's a note in the wikicode that might need to be resolved.
865:
I should also mention that the dignitaries are named in the FOM graphics during the TV broadcast.--
847:
FIA's policy of political neutrality (Northern Cyprus is only officially recognised by Turkey).--
901:
I edited the 14:00 issue and another issue JKBrooks85 noted myself, the MOSNUM thing remains. --
960:
902:
890:
872:
854:
832:
791:
766:
734:
700:
682:
660:
642:
625:
600:
575:
550:
525:
500:
470:
441:
409:
378:
317:
296:
275:
197:
175:
217:
53:
942:
805:
714:
421:
335:
254:
237:
928:
397:
This citation is the two-page statistical section at the end of the race report in the
293:
Alonso is mentioned in the lede with surname only, without prior wikilinked full name.
824:
885:
867:
849:
786:
761:
729:
620:
595:
570:
545:
520:
495:
465:
436:
404:
373:
312:
192:
170:
109:
489:
Not really. I was asked to include this specific information in the most recent
420:
Putting that under an additional sources/references header might be appropriate.
696:
213:
398:
232:
924:
366:
copy edit and looking over the article, I have a few additional questions.
274:: I checked sources at the last FAC; nothing changed, all looks good.
618:
Changed to "Ferrari used one more set of Soft tyres than McLaren".--
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
754:
right before the Race subsection, but they're scattered throughout.
129:
Featured article candidates/2008 Hungarian Grand Prix/archive3
124:
Featured article candidates/2008 Hungarian Grand Prix/archive2
119:
Featured article candidates/2008 Hungarian Grand Prix/archive1
155:
883:
And thank you for your responses to JKBrooks85 above!--
823:
sources -- in
Hungarian, all I could find was that the
105:
101:
97:
57:
371:
Thanks for the copyedit; it all looks fine to me.--
981:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
593:Removed, as it was just for my own reference.--
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
987:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
779:"As of January 2011" -- is this still true?
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
656:2008 Formula One season#2008 Race Calendar
134:
137:
116:
7:
230:- no dabs or dead external links. --
24:
955:I could only repeat the above;
638:What time did the race start?
1:
969:12:54, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
951:11:59, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
933:03:12, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
911:00:11, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
897:19:23, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
879:19:21, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
861:19:16, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
841:19:12, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
814:12:26, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
798:15:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
773:16:21, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
741:15:49, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
723:23:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
709:14:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
691:14:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
669:14:50, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
651:14:40, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
632:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
607:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
582:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
557:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
532:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
507:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
477:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
448:16:38, 15 February 2011 (UTC)
430:23:36, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
416:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
385:17:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
349:02:13, 14 February 2011 (UTC)
324:19:25, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
305:18:54, 13 February 2011 (UTC)
284:12:43, 8 February 2011 (UTC)
266:22:30, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
244:19:54, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
228:Disambig/External Link check
222:19:16, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
204:18:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
182:18:02, 7 February 2011 (UTC)
31:featured article nomination
1004:
72:2008 Hungarian Grand Prix
65:2008 Hungarian Grand Prix
984:Please do not modify it.
56:20:06, 15 February 2011
36:Please do not modify it.
937:I'm going to offer my
697:Formula One#Television
825:then defence minister
289:Consistency comment
402:the references?--
185:
163:
162:
995:
986:
895:
893:
888:
877:
875:
870:
859:
857:
852:
796:
794:
789:
771:
769:
764:
739:
737:
732:
630:
628:
623:
605:
603:
598:
580:
578:
573:
555:
553:
548:
530:
528:
523:
505:
503:
498:
475:
473:
468:
446:
444:
439:
414:
412:
407:
383:
381:
376:
345:
338:
322:
320:
315:
264:
262:
257:
240:
235:
202:
200:
195:
180:
178:
173:
168:Nominator(s): --
166:
135:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
1003:
1002:
998:
997:
996:
994:
993:
992:
991:
982:
891:
886:
884:
873:
868:
866:
855:
850:
848:
820:Content comment
792:
787:
785:
767:
762:
760:
735:
730:
728:
626:
621:
619:
601:
596:
594:
576:
571:
569:
551:
546:
544:
526:
521:
519:
501:
496:
494:
471:
466:
464:
442:
437:
435:
410:
405:
403:
379:
374:
372:
344:27 and counting
343:
336:
318:
313:
311:
272:Sources comment
260:
255:
253:
238:
233:
198:
193:
191:
176:
171:
169:
133:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
1001:
999:
990:
989:
976:
974:
973:
972:
971:
935:
916:
915:
914:
913:
881:
863:
817:
816:
801:
800:
781:
780:
776:
775:
756:
755:
751:
750:
749:
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
695:Indeed: check
675:
674:
673:
672:
671:
635:
634:
615:
614:
610:
609:
590:
589:
585:
584:
565:
564:
560:
559:
540:
539:
535:
534:
515:
514:
510:
509:
486:
485:
480:
479:
460:
459:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
394:
393:
388:
387:
368:
367:
363:
352:
351:
327:
326:
269:
268:
225:
224:
187:
186:
161:
160:
159:
158:
156:External links
153:
148:
140:
139:
132:
131:
126:
121:
115:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
1000:
988:
985:
979:
978:
977:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
948:
944:
940:
936:
934:
930:
926:
921:
918:
917:
912:
908:
904:
900:
899:
898:
894:
889:
882:
880:
876:
871:
864:
862:
858:
853:
845:
844:
843:
842:
838:
834:
830:
826:
821:
815:
811:
807:
803:
802:
799:
795:
790:
783:
782:
778:
777:
774:
770:
765:
758:
757:
752:
742:
738:
733:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
712:
711:
710:
706:
702:
698:
694:
693:
692:
688:
684:
679:
678:
676:
670:
666:
662:
657:
654:
653:
652:
648:
644:
640:
639:
637:
636:
633:
629:
624:
617:
616:
612:
611:
608:
604:
599:
592:
591:
587:
586:
583:
579:
574:
567:
566:
562:
561:
558:
554:
549:
542:
541:
537:
536:
533:
529:
524:
517:
516:
512:
511:
508:
504:
499:
492:
488:
487:
482:
481:
478:
474:
469:
462:
461:
457:
456:
449:
445:
440:
433:
432:
431:
427:
423:
419:
418:
417:
413:
408:
400:
396:
395:
390:
389:
386:
382:
377:
370:
369:
364:
360:
359:
358:
356:
350:
346:
340:
339:
332:
329:
328:
325:
321:
316:
309:
308:
307:
306:
302:
298:
294:
290:
286:
285:
281:
277:
273:
267:
263:
258:
251:
248:
247:
246:
245:
242:
241:
236:
229:
223:
219:
215:
211:
208:
207:
206:
205:
201:
196:
184:
183:
179:
174:
165:
164:
157:
154:
152:
149:
147:
144:
143:
142:
141:
136:
130:
127:
125:
122:
120:
117:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
983:
980:
975:
961:Rontombontom
956:
938:
919:
903:Rontombontom
833:Rontombontom
819:
818:
701:Rontombontom
683:Rontombontom
661:Rontombontom
643:Rontombontom
354:
353:
334:
330:
297:Rontombontom
292:
288:
287:
276:Brianboulton
271:
270:
249:
231:
227:
226:
209:
188:
167:
151:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
491:peer review
190:welcomed.--
54:Laser brain
943:JKBrooks85
806:JKBrooks85
715:JKBrooks85
543:Changed.--
422:JKBrooks85
399:Autocourse
337:Giants2008
392:citation?
355:Comments
310:Fixed.--
146:Analysis
50:promoted
957:support
939:support
920:Support
887:Midgrid
869:Midgrid
851:Midgrid
788:Midgrid
784:Done.--
763:Midgrid
759:Done.--
731:Midgrid
727:Done.--
622:Midgrid
597:Midgrid
572:Midgrid
568:Done.--
547:Midgrid
522:Midgrid
497:Midgrid
484:season.
467:Midgrid
438:Midgrid
406:Midgrid
375:Midgrid
331:Support
314:Midgrid
250:Support
210:Support
194:Midgrid
172:Midgrid
138:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
892:(talk)
874:(talk)
856:(talk)
793:(talk)
768:(talk)
736:(talk)
627:(talk)
602:(talk)
577:(talk)
552:(talk)
527:(talk)
502:(talk)
472:(talk)
443:(talk)
411:(talk)
380:(talk)
319:(talk)
256:Aptery
214:KnowIG
199:(talk)
177:(talk)
93:delete
362:book.
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
965:talk
959:. --
947:talk
929:talk
925:4u1e
907:talk
837:talk
831:. --
829:here
810:talk
719:talk
705:talk
699:. --
687:talk
665:talk
647:talk
426:talk
301:talk
280:talk
261:gial
234:Pres
218:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
493:.--
52:by
967:)
949:)
931:)
909:)
839:)
812:)
721:)
707:)
689:)
681:--
667:)
659:--
649:)
428:)
357::
347:)
303:)
295:--
291::
282:)
220:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
963:(
945:(
927:(
905:(
835:(
808:(
717:(
703:(
685:(
663:(
645:(
424:(
341:(
299:(
278:(
239:N
216:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.