Knowledge

:Featured article candidates/Changsha Kingdom/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

657:"In 183 BC, however, Zhao Tuo proclaimed himself emperor in Nanyue and then twice invaded Changsha, occupying a few counties. The reason was Empress Lü's decision to ban the trade of iron ware" This raises several issues. Did he proclaim in Nanyue that he was emperor of China or of Nanyue? Was he trying to conquer Changsha? "The reason was" is vague and "the trade of iron ware" is ungrammatical. Maybe "In 183 BC the empress banned the export of iron wares to Nanyue, and Zhao Tuo retaliated by twice invading Changsha." 360:"domesticated animals including pigs, cattle, sheep, dogs, and chickens and game animals and fowl including deer, hares, wild geese, Mandarin ducks, wild ducks, bamboo partridges, cranes, doves, magpies, owls, and sparrows." You have "and" three times in that list, which reads a little clumsily. Also, are you sure that deer and hares are types of fowl? 1306:
At the least. The lead should summarize the article, and at the moment it's almost entirely summarizing just the history section. Rereading it, I also wonder whether there should be a dedicated section or subsection outlining our sources of information about the kingdom - for example, after the lead
1060:
As for the economy and living standards, I've moved some information on the economy (mainly about agriculture and artisanship) to a new standalone section. What do you think about this? I don't remember reading anything in the sources about details the Kingdom's daily life – I can't add much to this
505:
The Changsha Kingdom was a kingdom of China's Han dynasty, located in present-day Hunan and some surrounding areas." I find this confusing as I would take it to mean that it was independent but you say above that it was a vassal kingdom. For clarity, maybe "The Changsha Kingdom was a vassal kingdom
102:
China, notably the only one that is not ruled by the imperial clan. Changsha is one of the better known among the kingdoms, but overall, this is perhaps still a relatively overlooked topic in Chinese history. The article has recently passed GA review, and hopefully it is also up to FA standards now.
1557:
The beginning of the territorial extent section needs to be reworded. Instead of starting with a statement about a theoretical size, before saying it is unlikely, and then giving another theoretical size, then caveating, perhaps group the two sizes and then state both are unlikely, and then provide
1531:
It is not immediately clear what the first source is citing. Upon checking it seems to be the basis for the map, but I haven't seen images sourced like that before. If it contains information that was useful to build that picture, than perhaps it contains information that can be introduced as prose
528:
The sources indeed say that they were all sons. But the ancient Chinese usually marry and have children in late teenage years, and there's also the fact that Wu Rui was already quite old in 203 BC. Assuming he was 60 at that time, we'll have 84 years for 5 generations, 17 on average, so still a bit
1481:
I think my point may have been unclear: my question is not whether currently these texts are specific to this region, but historically - were they written by Changsha scholars, or brought into Changsha from elsewhere? The last work is mentioned to be by a Chu author but for the others this is not
859:
Adjusted the paragraph and moved the tutor's part higher up. The chancellor is still the highest office – the chancellor was also appointed by the emperor rather than the king himself, so the grand tutor's tasks would not have much to do with him. Based on the job's duties I also imagine that the
689:
Thanks for taking the time to go over this article! About the language issue, I think the difficulty is perhaps caused by the historical background of this period. There were some very complex conflicts in the 3rd-2nd centuries BC period so it's inevitable that some parts may seem unclear without
1541:
The second source is used to establish that "Changsha was one of the largest and longest-lasting kingdoms in Han China." However, this is not repeated in the article body, and the article body does not definitively support the statement, as it only compares its length with the kingdoms that were
1208:
In which case could you put the map images PD tag(s) inside a =={{int:license-header}}== notice - as you have done for the comets and banner images. I was doubtful as to whether the funeral banner can be considered "two-dimensional", but on consideration I think that it can.
629:"it was the only one to survive the Emperor's campaign to eliminate kings that were not members of the imperial family" This assumes that you have already mentioned the campaign. I would say in x year the emperor launched a campaign and Changsha was the only one to survive. 1185:
For the three images in question I think the "faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art" tag should be enough for public domain status. They are all used in a lot of articles, especially the map which is also in the FA article
1392:"was demoted first to the rank of duke and then to a commoner" - need a bit more context here. Is duke a high rank within the ranking system at that time? Are there many ranks between duke and commoner? How does it compare to the rank of marquis mentioned later? 513:
Edited to 'a kingdom within the Han Empire of China'. I'm a bit hesitant to use the term "vassal", though. In Chinese contexts, the term seem to be more commonly applied to non-Chinese states outside of China proper (for example the Xiongnu in later Han
1448:
The Economy and Science sections could do more to contextualize their contents. For example, how did diet and agriculture in this region compare to elsewhere in the empire? Are the texts mentioned specific to this region or imported from elsewhere?
1509:
I've addressed the issues. Most of these are relatively minor problems on language and style left over in previous rounds of reviews, I believe. If there are still any remaining it should be entirely possible for me to correct them in one run.
460:
I started to say above that I have done a little copy editing, and that you should let me know if you are unhappy with any of my changes. But I only got part way through the sentence. Apologies. I have done a little more, and the same applies.
1469:
The information on economy and science are all based on pieces of archeological evidence scattered in different tombs so I don't think making such a comparison will be easy. If you find it really important then maybe I can link the
556:"the Changsha branch of the Liu family saw its autonomy greatly diminished". The relevance of this comment is unclear without explanation. Had the kingship been granted to a member of the Liu family? Did they side with the rebels? 852:" the imperial government". Also, this contradicts the statement that the chancellor was highest. I think you should put the grand tutor at the start of Government section and clarify his power over the king and his government. 1107:"File:Han dynasty Kingdoms 195 BC.png" Source: the image may be "own work" - fine - but I assume that the information for it was drawn from a RS? Which needs to be cited, just like any other information in an article. See 867:"Meanwhile, the high status of the court clerk was similar to that of the Warring States rather than the Han central government." This means little unles you explain the status of the court clerk in the Warring States. 1134:"File:Western Han Mawangdui Silk Map.JPG" Sadly, while the original map may be out of copyright, the photograph of it isn't - or, at least, no evidence has been presented that it is. It has been scanned from 834:"Except for the chancellor and grand tutor (太傅, tàifù) who were selected by the imperial court, all officials were appointed by the king." I think you need a comma after "tutor (太傅, tàifù)" for clarity. 106:
This is my first FAC nomination but the article's language and style have been much improved thanks to the DYK and GA reviews. I'll try my best to solve any remaining issue. All feedback is welcome!
1696:
Okay, you're welcome to bring this back for another nom after addressing the sourcing issues (presumably beyond the two-week minimum waiting period for a re-nom after this is closed). Cheers,
292:
This source is used mainly for the translation of Chinese terms, so there is no inline citations yet. How do you think should the citations be added, or should I remove this entry altogether?
1552:
The lead says the kingdom was "re-established" in 155 BC. That gives the impression it was somehow ended after the initial dynasty died, but the article prose doesn't explain the gap at all.
250:"Zhao Tuo, King of Nanyue" In another case when you use this formulation ("Ying Bu, king of Huainan") you use a lower case k. There are arguments either way, but you should be consistent. 1061:
article right now since the coronavirus is keeping me at home, but once things settle down a bit I can hopefully go through the sources again and see if I can find more about the topic.
261:
It's from the imperial government. It is mentioned in the first sentence 'closely followed that of the Han central government', and I edited the following paragraph to make it clearer.
1408:
At the moment the article doesn't provide enough information for a reader to know that, even assuming the average reader is familiar with duke vs marquis in the western system.
896: 383:"A selection of beers, made from wheat, millet, and rice, was also available." This reads more like a sales brochure than an encyclopedia entry. Could you consider rephrasing? 690:
fully explaining the overall situation. I've rewritten the history section a bit and hopefully the chronology and events are a lot clearer now. Working on other issues soon.
299:
I have boldly moved it to "Further reading". If you don't like this, feel free to revert. Alternatively, you could add a sentence to this section explaining the book's role.
1568:
As an overall point, the lead is insufficient as a summary of the article. It is also unbalanced, with 1 article section (history) take up the majority of the lead.
132:"until Wu Zhu died without an heir." Could we have a date after this. Which will also tell a reader the duration of the kingdom, which ought to be early in a lead. 612:"When the Chu Hegemon-King Xiang Yu became the prominent leader in the rebellion" This is ungrammatical. I would say "the most prominent leader" or "the leader". 464:
A fine article. Impressive on first reading and prompt and effective responses to my comments. Are you sure that this is your first FAC? Happy to support.
40: 806:"Changsha was sparsely populated compared to other parts of the Han dynasty." A dynasty being sparsely populated sounds wrong. I would say "Han empire". 1286:. I originally came in to do a source review but spotted some prose and style issues that lead me to believe this isn't quite ready for promotion yet. 570:"Changsha was one of the largest and longest-lasting kingdoms of the Han dynasty." I think it would again be helpful to clarify with "vassal kingdoms". 1475: 945:. Looks fine now apart from the heading "Culture and life". That does not work because culture is part of life. How about "Culture and daily life"? 1478:" articles or add a summary of them. As for the texts, they are all found exclusively in this region. I've edited the section to make it clear. 1657:, you appear to have edited WP recently so pls address the above issues ASAP as we need to look at closing this one way or the other. Cheers, 1716: 1141:"File:Banière funéraire, peinture sur soie, Chine.jpg" Similar to above. The photograph is dated to 2015 and no case is made for it being PD. 30: 17: 1727: 536:
It seems to me very unrealistic. 24 years for 5 Wu generations and 105 years for 5 Liu generations! However you have to go by the source.
1108: 411:"Ironware had become available for agricultural and military application" What is "had become" alluding to? As opposed to, say, 'was'. 848:"the grand tutor played a much more extensive role in a kingdom, as he supervised the king for the imperial government." I would say " 778:"Han would eventually won its conflict with Chu" This is ungrammatical. Maybe "The Han would eventually win its conflict with the Chu" 1075:
That all looks good. Information about the economies of ancient civilisations tends to be fairly thin on the ground. I'm pleased to
626:
I am confused about the fall of the Qin. Was it a three way fight with Rui defecting from Chu to Liu Bang? If so, you should say so.
154:"he organized a mostly Baiyue army to rebel" To rebel against what he organized a mostly Baiyue army to rebel? And/or, to what end? 1746: 1705: 1690: 1666: 1648: 1634: 1611: 1581: 1519: 1491: 1458: 1417: 1346: 1316: 1278: 1259: 1240: 1218: 1199: 1179: 1088: 1070: 1044: 972: 954: 933: 908: 720: 699: 680: 545: 487: 473: 451: 429: 244: 115: 90: 1363:"measures 128 cm long by 190 cm wide but weights only 49 grams in total" - typo (should be "weighs") and also missing conversions 1360:"Numerous archaeological sites of the kingdom have been discovered and excavated; most notably Mawangdui" - incorrect punctuation 1125:
Ah. The original source is at the end of Description on the Commons page. I have added the cite to Source; feel free to edit it.
521:
Is it well established that each king was the son of the previous one? Five generations in 24 years (203-179 BC) seems unlikely.
1383:
202 BC was for the establishment of the Han empire, not the Changsha Kingdom. Made a small edit in case there is any ambiguity.
985:
I'm embarrassed to say that I knew nothing about this topic coming into the article. I'd like to offer the following comments:
1144:"File:Mawangdui Astrology Comets Ms.JPG" Similar. It seems to have been scanned direct from a book. It also lacks a US PD tag. 1572:
Comments aside, I enjoyed reading about the topic, and appreciate how cleanly the historiography is worked into the text.
750:"Rui's army joined forces with the Han leader Liu Bang" You should link "Han" as it is the first mention in the main text. 584:"Changsha was relatively advanced in technology and art." Relatively advanced compared with what? Other vassal kingdoms? 1547:
In the sentence "In 178 BC, the kingdom...", "the kingdom" should be changed, as the last entity mentioned was Nanyue.
1057:! It is really an obscure topic, usually this will only get one or two sentences at most in a book on Chinese history. 414:
Done, changed to 'was'. It seems that was not a totally new development, so 'Ironware was available' will be better.
1471: 827:
All deleted. It's because much of this article was edited by earlier reviewers. I wouldn't use that myself, though.
792:
Territory section. The places mentioned will mean nothing to many readers. Is any estimate of the area available?
197:
Changed to 'rebelled' – I think its cause will be difficult to explain in one or two sentences, so I left it out.
1231:
Fixed the map image. Personally I think the banner is fine – but the 2-D requirement is a bit confusing indeed.
1401:"Stripped of his titles" would be a better expression here. The rank of duke (English translation of the title 671:
More to follow. This is an interesting article, but I find it difficult to follow due to the unclear language.
442:
Many thanks for taking the time to review! I've corrected most of the issues here, and replied to the others.
194:"was forced to rebel" Again this seems to beg a question. Perhaps briefly state why, or change to 'rebelled'? 141:
Added several dates to the lead, including those of Wu Zhu's death and the second interruption of the kingdom.
1337:
Those specific examples, yes. The article would benefit from a more comprehensive pass for clarity and flow.
1630: 1577: 1405:) was roughly equivalent in status to its western counterpart so it won't need much additional explanation. 860:
tutor would not have direct power over other officials and affairs in the court, while the chancellor would.
506:
of China's Han dynasty, located in the south of the empire in present-day Hunan and some surrounding areas."
895:
That's it with my comments. See also one reply above. For future articles you might try asking for help at
1255: 1214: 1175: 1021:"The campaign was eventually cancelled " - "cancelled" sounds a bit wrong here. Should it be "abandonded?" 950: 904: 732:"After hearing news of the uprising, Wu Rui organized a mostly Baiyue army in support of the rebel." "the 676: 541: 469: 425: 240: 881:
You have a section heading "Culture", but it also includes food. Maybe "Food and culture" or "Daily life"
643:"who favored Huang–Lao political views" For clarity maybe "the Huang-Lao school of political thought". 1644: 1487: 1454: 1413: 1342: 1312: 1187: 166:: indicate which is the Changsha Kingdom. Eg 'Changsha Kingdom shown in light green, bottom centre'. 157:
I've provided some background for this period, so that it is now clear that he was against the Qin.
598:"the magistrate of Poyang County under the Qin" For clarity maybe "the previous dynasty, the Qin". 174:"The capital was known as Linxiang". "was known as" seems to beg questions? Why not simply 'was'? 1742: 1701: 1686: 1662: 1626: 1607: 1597: 1573: 1515: 1274: 1236: 1195: 1066: 968: 929: 716: 695: 483: 447: 111: 86: 1625:), and would oppose on that basis. I'm less sure how my other comments relate to the criteria. 1307:
the Mawangdui tombs are mentioned several times before we hit an explanation of what they are.
182:"survive the emperor's campaign" Upper case E, as you are referring to a specific emperor, per 1251: 1210: 1171: 1035:
Can anything be said about the Kingdom's economy and relative prosperity/standards of living?
946: 919: 900: 706: 672: 537: 465: 437: 421: 236: 1720: 1533: 1357:"20 marquisates was created from Changsha. These marquisates were" - plural vs singular verb 1084: 1040: 72: 61: 1640: 1593: 1504: 1483: 1450: 1409: 1338: 1308: 1118:
I've written the source at its commons page but forgot to cite here, added a citation now.
989:"that resulted in the collapse of Qin" - should this be "that resulted in the collapse of 400: 1303:
the current lead should be sufficient. Maybe the second paragraph can be expanded a bit?
1719:
has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
1639:
There don't appear to have been any edits to the article since my most recent comments.
1374:
Infobox and text both give established date as 203/202 BC, but lead says only 202 - why?
1622: 1621:, after re-checking I continue to feel that this article does not meet requirement 2a ( 1300: 316:
These journals probably don't have DOIs. Will urls be sufficient? I've added the links.
138:
add to the first sentence ', which existed 203 –157 BC, 157 BC – 9 AD and 26 – 33 AD'
1738: 1697: 1682: 1676: 1658: 1654: 1618: 1603: 1511: 1270: 1232: 1191: 1062: 1007:"The Han would eventually won its conflict" - the grammar and tense are both off here 964: 925: 712: 691: 479: 443: 183: 107: 82: 53: 764:"Hegemon-King Xiang Yu" What is a Hegemon-King? Is there an article you can link to? 924:
All fixed. Thanks for the advice, I'm definitely going to try that in the future.
1734: 1080: 1054: 1036: 211: 99: 57: 344:"All of the imperial Nine Ministers also" One of "All" or "also" is redundant. 820:"vassal kingdoms" You use this term twice although you say you do not like it. 1250:
All images are appropriately licenced, positioned, captioned and alt texted.
223: 563:
The 'Liu family' is supposed to mean the imperial family, changed to that.
1681:
You can go on and close it. I won't have much time in the next few days.
352:"Rice was the main staple food" One of "main" or "staple" is redundant. 1563:
Is there a reason the final two kings did not receive Posthumous names?
1103:
Nb. It is my intention to claim points for this review in the WikiCup.
799:
Unfortunately no, but maybe I can add a map to display these locations.
1482:
stated. And yes, I think broader contextualization would be useful.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1290:
Given the length of the article a longer lead would be appropriate
386:
Changed 'available' to 'discovered', that probably sounds better.
146:"was then still fertile lowlands" I think "still" is redundant. 420:
A cracking article. I enjoyed that. That's it from me for now.
327:
Ho hum. OK, let's leave it for whoever does the source review.
202:"the king of Changsha pretended to assist him" Upper case K. 125:
NB, I intend to claim points in the WikiCup for this review.
399:"Science and Technology" section header. Lower case t per 1299:
The article itself is not very long (18 kb prose) so per
363:
Rewritten the sentence, added "game animals" to the list.
1369:"was among the weakest among the kingdoms" - repetitive 235:
Looking pretty good so far. Nice work. More to follow.
65: 258:"but subtle differences remained" Remained from what? 1602:
How are things standing with your comments/oppose? --
897:
Knowledge:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Requests
1754:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 1366:"until early the 1st century AD" - missing a word 1329:Have concerns about some of the prose. Examples: 289:Hucker is in the bibliography, but is not cited. 210:"Wu Chen reigned for 8 years" "8" → 'eight', per 98:This article is about a vassal kingdom of early 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1760:No further edits should be made to this page. 1733:template in place on the talk page until the 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 214:. Other, similar, cases also need changing. 1532:as well? That would be better in terms of 281:"Citations" Several "p." should be 'pp.'. 205:Changed this and some other similar cases. 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates 1476:Science and technology of the Han dynasty 605:Done, added the time span of Qin dynasty. 313:Li Shisheng, Wu and Yi need identifiers. 888:Changed. What about 'culture and life'? 711:These are all great points, fixed now. 1151:Changed to appropriate tag on Commons. 18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates 7: 1269:Did I miss a source review? Cheers, 336:Loewe and Harper need page numbers. 1430:Curly quote marks shouldn't be used 1109:File:Battle of Cape Ecnomus map.svg 24: 1053:Nothing to be embarrassed about, 1536:for those who can't see the map. 1136:Artisans in early imperial China 177:Indeed, removed the 'known as'. 963:No problem with that, edited. 529:short but not too unrealistic. 1: 253:All changed to uppercase now. 1728:featured article candidates 31:featured article nomination 1777: 1520:02:59, 26 April 2020 (UTC) 1492:01:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 1472:Economy of the Han dynasty 1459:19:13, 25 April 2020 (UTC) 1418:01:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 1347:01:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 1317:01:30, 28 April 2020 (UTC) 1279:09:24, 20 April 2020 (UTC) 1260:16:19, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 1241:16:09, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 1219:14:49, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 1200:14:14, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 1180:10:40, 16 April 2020 (UTC) 1089:10:44, 14 April 2020 (UTC) 1071:03:28, 11 April 2020 (UTC) 1045:05:37, 10 April 2020 (UTC) 874:Added a brief explanation. 700:06:33, 29 March 2020 (UTC) 681:18:09, 28 March 2020 (UTC) 1158:Consider adding alt text. 973:06:55, 3 April 2020 (UTC) 955:17:13, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 934:03:10, 2 April 2020 (UTC) 909:14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 771:Changed to simply 'king'. 721:05:56, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 546:14:38, 1 April 2020 (UTC) 488:03:38, 8 March 2020 (UTC) 474:15:30, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 452:03:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC) 430:15:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 245:13:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 121:Support from Gog the Mild 116:10:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 91:10:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC) 1757:Please do not modify it. 1747:09:39, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 1706:09:37, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 1691:03:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC) 1667:13:07, 24 May 2020 (UTC) 1649:20:39, 22 May 2020 (UTC) 1635:16:34, 22 May 2020 (UTC) 1612:14:48, 22 May 2020 (UTC) 1582:11:37, 10 May 2020 (UTC) 162:The infobox map legend. 36:Please do not modify it. 1014:Rewritten the sentence. 619:Done, added 'the most'. 306:I see, that works well. 1439:I didn't find any ...? 478:Great to hear that :) 1587:Additional coord note 1542:eliminated by 190 BC. 1188:Sino-Roman relations 591:Rewritten this part. 1099:Image review - pass 222:Link "enfeoffed" - 500:Comments by Dudley 128:I have done some 1558:the explanations. 1138:so I am doubtful. 1079:this nomination. 981:Support by Nick-D 94: 1768: 1759: 1732: 1726: 1723:, and leave the 1680: 1601: 1508: 923: 710: 441: 272:Yes, that works. 79: 73:Changsha Kingdom 48:The article was 38: 1776: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1769: 1767: 1766: 1765: 1764: 1755: 1730: 1724: 1674: 1591: 1589: 1502: 1267: 1111:for an example. 1101: 983: 917: 704: 502: 435: 401:MOS:SECTIONCAPS 123: 76: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1774: 1772: 1763: 1762: 1750: 1749: 1737:goes through. 1709: 1708: 1672: 1671: 1670: 1669: 1637: 1588: 1585: 1570: 1569: 1565: 1564: 1560: 1559: 1554: 1553: 1549: 1548: 1544: 1543: 1538: 1537: 1523: 1522: 1500: 1499: 1498: 1497: 1496: 1495: 1494: 1462: 1461: 1445: 1444: 1443: 1442: 1441: 1440: 1432: 1431: 1427: 1426: 1425: 1424: 1423: 1422: 1421: 1420: 1394: 1393: 1389: 1388: 1387: 1386: 1385: 1384: 1376: 1375: 1372: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1364: 1361: 1358: 1354: 1353: 1352: 1351: 1350: 1349: 1326: 1325: 1324: 1323: 1322: 1321: 1320: 1319: 1301:MOS:LEADLENGTH 1292: 1291: 1266: 1263: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1245: 1244: 1243: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1203: 1202: 1169: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1160: 1159: 1155: 1154: 1153: 1152: 1146: 1145: 1142: 1139: 1131: 1130: 1129: 1128: 1127: 1126: 1120: 1119: 1113: 1112: 1100: 1097: 1096: 1095: 1094: 1093: 1092: 1091: 1058: 1048: 1047: 1032: 1031: 1030: 1029: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1016: 1015: 1009: 1008: 1004: 1003: 1002: 1001: 995: 994: 982: 979: 978: 977: 976: 975: 958: 957: 939: 938: 937: 936: 912: 911: 892: 891: 890: 889: 883: 882: 878: 877: 876: 875: 869: 868: 864: 863: 862: 861: 854: 853: 845: 844: 843: 842: 836: 835: 831: 830: 829: 828: 822: 821: 817: 816: 815: 814: 808: 807: 803: 802: 801: 800: 794: 793: 789: 788: 787: 786: 780: 779: 775: 774: 773: 772: 766: 765: 761: 760: 759: 758: 752: 751: 747: 746: 745: 744: 738: 737: 730: 726: 725: 724: 723: 702: 684: 683: 668: 667: 666: 665: 659: 658: 654: 653: 652: 651: 645: 644: 640: 639: 638: 637: 631: 630: 627: 623: 622: 621: 620: 614: 613: 609: 608: 607: 606: 600: 599: 595: 594: 593: 592: 586: 585: 581: 580: 579: 578: 572: 571: 567: 566: 565: 564: 558: 557: 553: 552: 551: 550: 549: 548: 531: 530: 523: 522: 518: 517: 516: 515: 508: 507: 501: 498: 497: 496: 495: 494: 493: 492: 491: 490: 455: 454: 418: 417: 416: 415: 409: 408: 407: 397: 396: 395: 389: 388: 387: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 367: 366: 365: 364: 358: 357: 356: 350: 349: 348: 342: 341: 340: 333: 332: 331: 330: 329: 328: 320: 319: 318: 317: 310: 309: 308: 307: 301: 300: 296: 295: 294: 293: 287: 286: 285: 284:All corrected. 278: 277: 276: 275: 274: 273: 265: 264: 263: 262: 256: 255: 254: 233: 232: 231: 230: 220: 219: 218: 208: 207: 206: 200: 199: 198: 192: 191: 190: 180: 179: 178: 172: 171: 170: 160: 159: 158: 152: 151: 150: 144: 143: 142: 133: 122: 119: 96: 95: 81:Nominator(s): 75: 70: 69: 64:) 25 May 2020 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1773: 1761: 1758: 1752: 1751: 1748: 1744: 1740: 1736: 1729: 1722: 1718: 1714: 1711: 1710: 1707: 1703: 1699: 1695: 1694: 1693: 1692: 1688: 1684: 1678: 1668: 1664: 1660: 1656: 1652: 1651: 1650: 1646: 1642: 1638: 1636: 1632: 1628: 1624: 1620: 1616: 1615: 1614: 1613: 1609: 1605: 1599: 1598:Chipmunkdavis 1595: 1586: 1584: 1583: 1579: 1575: 1567: 1566: 1562: 1561: 1556: 1555: 1551: 1550: 1546: 1545: 1540: 1539: 1535: 1530: 1529: 1528: 1527: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1506: 1501: 1493: 1489: 1485: 1480: 1479: 1477: 1473: 1468: 1467: 1466: 1465: 1464: 1463: 1460: 1456: 1452: 1447: 1446: 1438: 1437: 1436: 1435: 1434: 1433: 1429: 1428: 1419: 1415: 1411: 1407: 1406: 1404: 1400: 1399: 1398: 1397: 1396: 1395: 1391: 1390: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1379: 1378: 1377: 1373: 1368: 1365: 1362: 1359: 1356: 1355: 1348: 1344: 1340: 1336: 1335: 1333: 1332: 1331: 1330: 1328: 1327: 1318: 1314: 1310: 1305: 1304: 1302: 1298: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1294: 1293: 1289: 1288: 1287: 1285: 1281: 1280: 1276: 1272: 1264: 1262: 1261: 1257: 1253: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1230: 1229: 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1220: 1216: 1212: 1207: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1201: 1197: 1193: 1189: 1184: 1183: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1173: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1161: 1157: 1156: 1150: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1140: 1137: 1133: 1132: 1124: 1123: 1122: 1121: 1117: 1116: 1115: 1114: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1104: 1098: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1074: 1073: 1072: 1068: 1064: 1059: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1049: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1033: 1027: 1026: 1025: 1024: 1020: 1019: 1013: 1012: 1011: 1010: 1006: 1005: 999: 998: 997: 996: 992: 988: 987: 986: 980: 974: 970: 966: 962: 961: 960: 959: 956: 952: 948: 944: 941: 940: 935: 931: 927: 921: 916: 915: 914: 913: 910: 906: 902: 898: 894: 893: 887: 886: 885: 884: 880: 879: 873: 872: 871: 870: 866: 865: 858: 857: 856: 855: 851: 847: 846: 840: 839: 838: 837: 833: 832: 826: 825: 824: 823: 819: 818: 812: 811: 810: 809: 805: 804: 798: 797: 796: 795: 791: 790: 784: 783: 782: 781: 777: 776: 770: 769: 768: 767: 763: 762: 756: 755: 754: 753: 749: 748: 742: 741: 740: 739: 735: 731: 729:More comments 728: 727: 722: 718: 714: 708: 703: 701: 697: 693: 688: 687: 686: 685: 682: 678: 674: 670: 669: 663: 662: 661: 660: 656: 655: 649: 648: 647: 646: 642: 641: 635: 634: 633: 632: 628: 625: 624: 618: 617: 616: 615: 611: 610: 604: 603: 602: 601: 597: 596: 590: 589: 588: 587: 583: 582: 576: 575: 574: 573: 569: 568: 562: 561: 560: 559: 555: 554: 547: 543: 539: 535: 534: 533: 532: 527: 526: 525: 524: 520: 519: 512: 511: 510: 509: 504: 503: 499: 489: 485: 481: 477: 476: 475: 471: 467: 463: 462: 459: 458: 457: 456: 453: 449: 445: 439: 434: 433: 432: 431: 427: 423: 413: 412: 410: 405: 404: 402: 398: 393: 392: 391:Link zither. 390: 385: 384: 382: 381: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 368: 362: 361: 359: 354: 353: 351: 346: 345: 343: 338: 337: 335: 334: 326: 325: 324: 323: 322: 321: 315: 314: 312: 311: 305: 304: 303: 302: 298: 297: 291: 290: 288: 283: 282: 280: 279: 271: 270: 269: 268: 267: 266: 260: 259: 257: 252: 251: 249: 248: 247: 246: 242: 238: 228: 227: 225: 221: 216: 215: 213: 209: 204: 203: 201: 196: 195: 193: 188: 187: 185: 184:MOS:JOBTITLES 181: 176: 175: 173: 168: 167: 165: 161: 156: 155: 153: 148: 147: 145: 140: 139: 137: 134: 131: 130: 129: 126: 120: 118: 117: 113: 109: 104: 101: 93: 92: 88: 84: 78: 77: 74: 71: 68: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 1756: 1753: 1713:Closing note 1712: 1673: 1590: 1571: 1525: 1524: 1402: 1334:All edited. 1283: 1282: 1268: 1252:Gog the Mild 1249: 1211:Gog the Mild 1172:Gog the Mild 1170: 1135: 1102: 1076: 990: 984: 947:Dudley Miles 942: 920:Dudley Miles 901:Dudley Miles 850:on behalf of 849: 733: 707:Dudley Miles 673:Dudley Miles 538:Dudley Miles 466:Gog the Mild 438:Gog the Mild 422:Gog the Mild 419: 237:Gog the Mild 234: 217:All changed. 163: 135: 127: 124: 105: 97: 80: 49: 47: 35: 28: 212:MOS:NUMERAL 100:Han dynasty 1641:Nikkimaria 1594:Nikkimaria 1505:Nikkimaria 1484:Nikkimaria 1451:Nikkimaria 1410:Nikkimaria 1339:Nikkimaria 1309:Nikkimaria 1265:Coord note 1721:WP:FAC/ar 1717:candidate 1534:WP:ACCESS 734:rebellion 224:Feoffment 1739:Ian Rose 1715:: This 1698:Ian Rose 1683:Esiymbro 1677:Ian Rose 1659:Ian Rose 1655:Esiymbro 1619:Ealdgyth 1604:Ealdgyth 1526:Comments 1512:Esiymbro 1271:Ian Rose 1233:Esiymbro 1192:Esiymbro 1063:Esiymbro 965:Esiymbro 926:Esiymbro 713:Esiymbro 692:Esiymbro 577:Changed. 480:Esiymbro 444:Esiymbro 164:Optional 108:Esiymbro 83:Esiymbro 54:Ian Rose 50:archived 1623:WP:LEAD 1474:" and " 1077:support 943:Support 743:Edited. 514:times). 1284:Oppose 1081:Nick-D 1037:Nick-D 58:FACBot 1165:Done. 1028:Done. 1000:Done. 993:Qin"? 841:Done. 813:Done. 785:Done. 757:Done. 664:Done. 650:Done. 636:Done. 406:Done. 394:Done. 374:Nice. 355:Done. 347:Done. 339:Done. 229:Done. 189:Done. 169:Done. 149:Done. 16:< 1743:talk 1702:talk 1687:talk 1663:talk 1645:talk 1631:talk 1608:talk 1596:and 1578:talk 1516:talk 1488:talk 1455:talk 1414:talk 1403:gong 1343:talk 1313:talk 1275:talk 1256:talk 1237:talk 1215:talk 1196:talk 1176:talk 1085:talk 1067:talk 1055:Nick 1041:talk 969:talk 951:talk 930:talk 905:talk 717:talk 696:talk 677:talk 542:talk 484:talk 470:talk 448:talk 426:talk 241:talk 112:talk 87:talk 62:talk 56:via 1735:bot 1653:Hi 1627:CMD 1617:Hi 1574:CMD 1190:". 991:the 52:by 1745:) 1731:}} 1725:{{ 1704:) 1689:) 1665:) 1647:) 1633:) 1610:) 1580:) 1518:) 1490:) 1457:) 1416:) 1345:) 1315:) 1277:) 1258:) 1239:) 1217:) 1198:) 1178:) 1087:) 1069:) 1043:) 971:) 953:) 932:) 907:) 899:. 736:"? 719:) 698:) 679:) 544:) 486:) 472:) 450:) 428:) 403:. 243:) 226:. 186:. 136:Or 114:) 89:) 67:. 33:. 1741:( 1700:( 1685:( 1679:: 1675:@ 1661:( 1643:( 1629:( 1606:( 1600:: 1592:@ 1576:( 1514:( 1507:: 1503:@ 1486:( 1470:" 1453:( 1412:( 1341:( 1311:( 1273:( 1254:( 1235:( 1213:( 1194:( 1186:" 1174:( 1083:( 1065:( 1039:( 967:( 949:( 928:( 922:: 918:@ 903:( 715:( 709:: 705:@ 694:( 675:( 540:( 482:( 468:( 446:( 440:: 436:@ 424:( 239:( 110:( 85:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
Ian Rose
FACBot
talk

Changsha Kingdom
Esiymbro
talk
10:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Han dynasty
Esiymbro
talk
10:09, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
MOS:JOBTITLES
MOS:NUMERAL
Feoffment
Gog the Mild
talk
13:14, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
MOS:SECTIONCAPS
Gog the Mild
talk
15:23, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
Gog the Mild
Esiymbro
talk
03:50, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Gog the Mild

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.