Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured article candidates/Baker Street and Waterloo Railway/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

883: 891:
What is the point? I suspect the point is that you're expected to click to get full res (it's rather too full, actually); this is hard for people with slow connections, and inconvenient for everyone. The alt text could be a little more descriptive. The caption might just say "Map of the Baker Street & Waterloo Railway route and its extension over nearly three decades". But being able to read the key is critical to the colour and line coding on the map; the key should be a rectangle, tallish, with font-size twice the current. If it can't fit along the left side, put it in the sea of white on the right?
310:
In the specific example above, ref is not provided to support the introductory "With the extension to Paddington still under construction," bit, just the date of the bill's introduction. The fact that the extension to Paddington was under construction at the time is covered by ref and ref in the last paragraph of the previous section which states that construction began in August 1911 and was completed with the opening of the station in December 1913. --
1053:"Prominent men: drawings by Harry Furniss, circa 1880-1910" is not a publication but a database created by the NPG for Furniss's sketches. This image is likely a draft of Furniss's caricatures. I would advise not using it because of the 20-year publication rights (of previously unpublished works) in the UK that comes into effect even if the image would be PD due to 70-year-pma. Use the finished product in 276:
covers the whole system, including a couple of the others used directly here. The books used are all recent editions and are effectively a distillation of the primary and secondary sources available to the authors. With regards to technological/engineering issues, I have tried to avoid including much on these matters except in the construction section and have provided wiki-links to relevant articles on
1177:
appears to be the original from which it was created. It is ascribed to an unknown photographer and dated 1906. The retouching of the rivets and the painting out of the background is indicative that it was prepared for publication, probably for the Bakerloo line's opening in 1906. If it was published
890:
Well, my eyesight is pretty good, and I have great difficulty reading the text for the station names. There's a lot of white space, so why can't the font-size be bigger? "1906–33" or "1906–1933", with unspaced en dash, not spaced hyphen. Hands up anyone here who can make out a single word in the key.
309:
In most cases the London Gazette references are used to provide a direct primary source link to the actual bill that Badsey Ellis has referred to in his book as he has generally referred to the actual primary documents themselves and describes the planned route and station locations in his narrative.
222:
I am concerned about the status of Capital Transport as a vanity publisher, due to their website, their lack of an editorial or submissions policy, and Rose being acknowledged in World Cat as the publisher for "Rose, Douglas (1999). The London Underground, A Diagrammatic History. Douglas Rose/Capital
1350:
I see the images as supplementary to the text, which carries the detail of how the routes developed, and would prefer to keep them as simple as possible. Adding different colours or tones to the images would require an explanatory key that would, of necessity require the image dimensions boxes to be
1192:
The image used in this article is not a retouched version of the London Transport Museum photographic archive link provided—observe the differences in positioning of the car's windows in the background, which implies the images were taken at different distances. It would be needed to find out from
1326:
I was ready through the article and it's all very good, but going through the images it can get a bit confusing as to what the new stations that were rejected/accepted were—It involves a lot of scrolling back and forth between previous sections and the current section. Would it be possible (if you
1121:
I'm pretty sure that I uploaded the image with the same copyright tag as the gate stock image below, e.g. {{tl:PD-UK}}, but as it has been moved to commons, I cannot check this. Mike Horne's book gives no source information, so apart from the approximate date it is impossible to identify any other
1014:
and look forward to giving this latest one my full support. The issue holding me back at the moment is that of the PD status of three of the images. I am not an expert image reviewer, my comments being based on my understanding of advice I have received in the past. I hope an expert will come soon
402:
Not sure this is going to be possible without a complete rewrite of the BSicon templates which is unlikely to happen easily or soon. The diagram is a visual representation of what's in the text anyway and I am not sure that it would be very useful to an unsighted reader as I expect that a screen
275:
I don't think the fact that they have the same publisher has any particular relevance to the coverage of the subject matter within the books themselves. There have been many books published on the London Underground - Wolmar lists nearly fifty which he used as source materials for his book which
304:
indicates that a High Quality Reliable Source may not have been used to establish the narrative / weighting of the article; and subsequently sections of the Gazette have been cherry picked to establish a historical narrative that may be substantially Original Research, ie "With the extension to
233:
Although most of the books in the references list are published by Capital Transport, the company is not a vanity publisher, but a small specialist publisher on transport subjects - particularly those in London. A number of the books used for the article are published in association with the
799:
too small, and most of the image is just white space. Same for the others. I'm not sure a real photo (Oxford Circus station? The temporary pier?) wouldn't be better in the lead, with the current lead map further down, centred, and larger (i.e., not squeezing text at
1117:
Jetty picture: Similar problem - when was it first published? Additionally, you are claiming that the author has been dead for 70+ years, but we can't assume this since we don't know who he/she was. A photographer aged 25 in 1896 would only have been 69 in 1940.
1335:
would have Hampstead Road and Euston and St George's Circus through Old Kent Road as red (or whatever). Or maybe you could have the current route slightly faded or some other way of distinction. Just my AUD$ 0.02 and if you think I'm a nutter then so be it!
254:
and in larger bookshops with specialist transport sections (for example, Waterstone's in Piccadilly). I believe that it is reasonable to assume that the museum and Waterstone's would only be selling these titles if they were considered to be good quality
91: 271:
I am concerned about a source reliance stemming from Capital Transport publications separate to the status of the publisher. What other monographs of the tube system exist? Journal Articles from history of technology and science / engineering?
1039:(which I couldn't find when I made the scan) indicates that it is from a set titled "Prominent men: drawings by Harry Furniss, circa 1880-1910". It therefore seems likely that it was published before Wright's death and no later than 1910. -- 794:
I think you created them, so can you massively increase the size of the text? The year range should have an unspaced en dash in the first one (see MOSDASH). I've boosted the px size of the Baker Street excerpt below, but the text is
306:^ London Gazette: no. 28552, pp. 8615–8620, 21 November 1911. Retrieved on 2009-11-07." Some of these uses are clear, but in some the passing of an act is being used to imply that substantive things happened in the real world. 181:
I did not reply here until now as I felt that the comments below adequately covered my concerns in such a self-evident manner that to note it would be superfluous. All my concerns have been adequately addressed. :)
787:(1) Text on maps unreadable. (2) Images mostly tiny. I've boosted the size of some of the pics, so you may wish to audit the placement. (3) The prose could do with an independent copy-edit—not a long job, though. 1174: 810:
I was trying not to force the image sizes, but will be happy to make the gate stock one bigger. If it is moved after the text in the section with a {{clearleft}} afterwards, I think it will stop the pinching.
1327:
don't have a problem with it) for the images to contain some easy to recognise distinction? maybe colour the station's red for rejected and green for accepted from the previous image in the article. So the
807:
I will see what I can do about the sizes of the maps and the text they contain. I want to keep the text size in the route progression maps consistent from one to another so that the scale can be maintained.
1058: 1298:
Sorry, I missed his comments which, together with your responses, remove my concerns about images. I have moved to full support - sorry it's taken so long but I've been busy, been away blah blah blah...
813:
I would like to keep the main map at the top because it gives more of a sense of the article than the pier and the Oxford tube station pictures that only relate to a small aspect of the story. --
127:
I am nominating this article because I believe it covers its subject fully and meets the standard required to be included amongst the set of featured. It is a companion to the featured articles
1173:
Mike Horne's book from which this was scanned has no source information for the image. The uploaded version does not appear in the London Transport Museum photographic archive, though
1036: 421:
which uses many icon images to comprise the whole map. Forcing alt description text into the diagram means that you need to input each desciption for each icon, in the case of
132: 1031:
who died in 1925. Wright killed himself in 1904 following the famous trial. The Badsey-Ellis book, from which the image was scanned, ascribes the source to the
1012:: I think the maps are now fine, and so is the prose. I continue to be impressed by the extent of industry and research which is behind these railway articles, 40: 107: 136: 1377: 1360: 1345: 1308: 1293: 1279: 1262: 1244: 1216: 1202: 1187: 1159: 1145: 1131: 1106: 1088: 1048: 999: 976: 951: 936: 919: 904: 877: 857: 822: 772: 733: 699: 679: 539: 519: 489: 471: 435: 412: 374: 335: 319: 293: 264: 205: 191: 165: 148: 82: 510:
I think 88 and 89 were different because they were copied over from one of the companion articles. Changed all retrieved dates to full UK style date.--
230:." The impact of sourcing an article so significantly from sources published by a vanity publisher would be to undermine its status in terms of 1b/c. 426:
50 times. Ultimately the ineffectiveness to display a proper alt text from WP:ROUTE diagram shouldn't challenge the qualificaition of the article. --
1193:
whom or where did Mike Horne get his photos from, and whether they fall into the public domain or was he given permission/license to publish them.
829:
Example of copy-editing needed, in the lead: "fraud" could be "fraudulent behaviour" ... unsure. "It" refers to Whitaker or LGFC or BS? "connected
686: 442: 30: 17: 963:
assuming the issue regarding the maps is sorted out to everyone's satisfaction. As David says above,my concerns regarding this were all resolved
1207:
Agreed. Windows are slightly different as if the photographer took two shots from slightly different positions. I will remove from article. --
1136:
Brian is correct here. You need to know who is the author and be verifiably certain he is dead beyond 70 years to use any 70-year-pma tag.
403:
reader will read left to right across a row rather than up down. I will see if there is a way to make a screen reader skip this diagram. --
112: 582: 448: 390: 227: 64: 1122:
information on its origin or if it was published at the time. I'm quite happy to remove it if that is thought to be the solution.--
1253:
as she is not reviewing images at the moment. Hopefully, my answers above can help someone else make a decision on this matter.--
536: 353: 1062: 440:
Actually, adding alt text is both possible and practical, and I've demonstrated this for the diagram in question; please see
305:
Paddington still under construction, the LER published a bill in November 1911 for the continuation to Queen's Park. =: -->
558: 128: 756: 590: 456: 752: 1032: 574: 1373: 1341: 365:
Access to the Times links on infotrac is often available via membership of local public libraries in the UK.--
196:
Thanks for confirming. I didn't want to assume that everything was OK, if there was something I had missed. --
1332: 1328: 1020:
Whittaker Wright: when was this image first published? My understanding is that the 70-year rule applies to
745: 235: 1076: 1304: 1275: 1240: 968: 654: 620: 610: 763:
much as an Ordnance Survey Map would be. For a map published in 1949, this would have expired in 1999.--
281: 882: 964: 931: 644: 630: 1369: 1356: 1337: 1289: 1258: 1212: 1198: 1183: 1155: 1141: 1127: 1102: 1084: 1044: 994: 947: 915: 853: 818: 768: 695: 675: 532: 515: 485: 467: 408: 389:: The large images all have some, but the bottom navbox and the images that make up the diagram in 370: 349: 315: 289: 260: 201: 144: 78: 664: 600: 1250: 730: 431: 362:. Double-check that the five galegroup Times links work (they require registration so I can't). 331: 187: 161: 716: 418: 1300: 1271: 1236: 1170:
Gates Stock: I am not sure that PD in the USA is covered by the existing licence information.
942:
Just testing! I've got too many versions on my hard drive and used the wrong one. Now fixed.--
277: 224: 53: 1069: 670:'s documentation is quite cryptic, so I'm reluctant to charge in and fix this stuff myself. 1093:
Excellent, Thanks for finding that. I will upload the original 3 caricature image from the
833:" would avoid "to" x 3. Remove "covering"? "In 1933, it and the rest ..."—this is awkward. 741: 394: 384: 251: 926: 899: 872: 845: 760: 586:
section still generates dozens of images that lack alt text. This diagram is generated by
925:(Cough) David, you've reverted back to the West Coast Main Line and not the DC Line... – 719:... is it out of copyright? In other words, are we linking to a copyright violation here? 1024:
works, and if the image was not published before 1923 then it may not be PD in the USA.
804:—even now, it squeezes). The 1906 Gate pic is tiny AND squeezes text (a breach of MoS). 1352: 1285: 1267: 1254: 1208: 1194: 1179: 1151: 1137: 1123: 1098: 1080: 1040: 987: 943: 911: 849: 814: 764: 691: 671: 528: 511: 481: 463: 404: 366: 345: 311: 285: 256: 197: 140: 74: 1232: 1028: 726: 427: 327: 183: 157: 836:
I think fraud is more appropriate; "fraudulent behaviour" seems a bit equivocal
892: 865: 684:
It looks like the diagram's alt text will be fixed at the template level; see
399:
is vastly improved and looks good. (updated on 16:33, 17 December 2009 (UTC))
725:
Otherwise, sources look okay, links checked out with the link checker tool.
548:. I have fixed many of the alt text issues noted in the previous comment by 326:
If you could satisfy these concerns are groundless, it would be wonderful.
985:
I read this ages ago, then forgot about it, Reread today, happy to support
499: 417:
Technically possible, but in reality impractical. The map is created by
687:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Route diagram template #Alt text in route diagrams
650:
so the images are displayed without alt text. Can you please fix this?
443:
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Route diagram template #Alt text in route diagrams
910:
Text in all maps has now been increased by 63%. How does that look? --
92:
Featured article candidates/Baker Street and Waterloo Railway/archive1
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
393:
don't have it. The diagram's images need alts because they aren't
1097:
book and a crop of just whitaker to replace the existing image.--
1270:
is extremely knowledgeable on images, and usually very helpful.
886:
Geographic route map of the Baker Street & Waterloo Railway
480:
I've dug into the navbox to add alt text for the image there --
1249:
I did make a request that Awadewit have a look at these, but
717:
http://homepage.ntlworld.com/clive.billson/tubemaps/1949.html
755:, which was in public ownership as part of the nationalised 502:
Compare e.g. refs 81 and 88. Consider using one format for
117: 1351:
enlarged, potentially crowding the space on the page. --
848:
provided some comments before it came to FAC. Thanks. --
744:
states that the images are used with permission of the
566: 550: 57: 1331:
would have Marylebone in green (or whatever) and the
1231:
I await the verdict of one better informed than me.
759:, it is arguable that the image would be covered by 284:, etc. which cover these subjects in more detail. -- 1389:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 1178:in 1906, it would be in the public domain now -- 636:to generate the image, but neglects to pass the 41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates 133:Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 1395:No further edits should be made to this page. 1324:Comments on your Images (just to annoy you!!) 300:I am concerned that the extensive use of the 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 397:and give more info on the represented stops. 580:. However, the diagram at the start of the 425:, you'll have to repeat the same text : --> 137:Charing Cross, Euston and Hampstead Railway 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates 240:The Bakerloo Line - An Illustrated History 96: 1284:Jappalang has already commented above.-- 881: 446:. This shouldn't require any change to 99: 89: 637: 500:Use a consistent style for ref dates. 248:London's Disused Underground Stations 7: 616:to generate the problematic images. 1235:might be persuaded to take a look. 360:No dab links or dead external links 1150:I'll remove it from the article.-- 24: 449:Baker Street and Waterloo Railway 423:Baker Street and Waterloo Railway 244:The Story of London's Underground 65:Baker Street and Waterloo Railway 1027:The Whitaker Wright image is by 751:As the map was produced for the 250:) and they are all sold by the 1: 1245:17:12, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 1188:22:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 1132:22:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 1049:22:14, 29 December 2009 (UTC) 1000:08:06, 28 December 2009 (UTC) 977:17:44, 24 December 2009 (UTC) 952:12:04, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 937:02:01, 20 December 2009 (UTC) 920:01:09, 19 December 2009 (UTC) 905:12:22, 17 December 2009 (UTC) 878:14:42, 14 December 2009 (UTC) 858:00:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 823:00:51, 15 December 2009 (UTC) 680:04:56, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 540:01:53, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 520:17:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 490:11:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 413:17:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 375:17:39, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 336:01:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 320:11:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 294:11:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 265:11:40, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 166:01:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 149:01:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 129:City and South London Railway 83:01:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC) 1077:commons:Template:PD-UK-known 842:Think I've got all the rest. 773:23:29, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 757:British Transport Commission 734:14:38, 2 December 2009 (UTC) 700:08:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 472:08:42, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 436:01:37, 1 December 2009 (UTC) 1378:07:53, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 1361:02:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 1346:16:26, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 1309:17:29, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 1294:02:56, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 1280:00:47, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 1263:23:31, 1 January 2010 (UTC) 1217:11:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 1203:01:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 1160:11:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 1146:01:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 1107:11:41, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 1089:01:04, 2 January 2010 (UTC) 740:The lead page for the site 551:editing and adding alt text 206:00:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC) 192:23:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC) 31:featured article nomination 1412: 753:London Transport Executive 1033:National Portrait Gallery 1392:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 1065:), which is undeniably 1015:and clear the matter up 746:London Transport Museum 236:London Transport Museum 56:23:20, 10 January 2010 1175:this untouched version 887: 839:"It" is the BS&WR. 1095:Harry Furniss at Home 1055:Harry Furniss at Home 885: 660:is undocumented, and 606:, which in turn uses 559:Bakerloo line navbox 591:BS&WR route map 506:dates in citations. 457:BS&WR route map 1037:page for the image 888: 278:tunnelling shields 939: 395:purely decorative 391:section "Opening" 242:, Day and Reed's 125: 124: 86: 1403: 1394: 1251:she has declined 1074: 1068: 1063:Internet Archive 997: 990: 974: 971: 934: 929: 924: 902: 897: 875: 870: 669: 663: 659: 653: 649: 643: 639: 635: 629: 625: 619: 615: 609: 605: 599: 595: 589: 579: 575:Rail-interchange 573: 569: 563: 557: 553: 461: 455: 97: 71: 48:The article was 38: 1411: 1410: 1406: 1405: 1404: 1402: 1401: 1400: 1399: 1390: 1072: 1066: 995: 988: 972: 969: 932: 927: 900: 893: 873: 866: 761:Crown Copyright 667: 661: 657: 651: 647: 641: 633: 627: 623: 617: 613: 607: 603: 597: 593: 587: 577: 571: 567:adding alt text 565: 561: 555: 549: 507: 459: 453: 398: 68: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 1409: 1407: 1398: 1397: 1385: 1384: 1383: 1382: 1381: 1380: 1370:Sanguis Sanies 1338:Sanguis Sanies 1320: 1319: 1318: 1317: 1316: 1315: 1314: 1313: 1312: 1311: 1268:User:Jappalang 1228: 1227: 1226: 1225: 1224: 1223: 1222: 1221: 1220: 1219: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1164: 1163: 1162: 1115: 1114: 1113: 1112: 1111: 1110: 1109: 1003: 1002: 957: 956: 955: 954: 940: 863: 862: 861: 860: 843: 840: 837: 827: 826: 825: 811: 808: 780: 779: 778: 777: 776: 775: 749: 722: 721: 712: 705: 704: 703: 702: 525: 524: 523: 522: 498: 495: 494: 493: 492: 478: 477: 476: 475: 474: 388: 380: 379: 378: 377: 339: 338: 324: 323: 322: 302:London Gazette 298: 297: 296: 269: 268: 267: 220: 219: 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 212: 211: 210: 209: 208: 123: 122: 121: 120: 118:External links 115: 110: 102: 101: 95: 94: 88: 87: 73:Nominator(s): 67: 62: 61: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 1408: 1396: 1393: 1387: 1386: 1379: 1375: 1371: 1368: 1365:Fair enough. 1364: 1363: 1362: 1358: 1354: 1349: 1348: 1347: 1343: 1339: 1334: 1330: 1325: 1322: 1321: 1310: 1306: 1302: 1297: 1296: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1283: 1282: 1281: 1277: 1273: 1269: 1266: 1265: 1264: 1260: 1256: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1246: 1242: 1238: 1234: 1233:User:Awadewit 1230: 1229: 1218: 1214: 1210: 1206: 1205: 1204: 1200: 1196: 1191: 1190: 1189: 1185: 1181: 1176: 1172: 1171: 1169: 1161: 1157: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1147: 1143: 1139: 1135: 1134: 1133: 1129: 1125: 1120: 1119: 1116: 1108: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1091: 1090: 1086: 1082: 1078: 1075:(for US) and 1071: 1064: 1060: 1056: 1052: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1042: 1038: 1034: 1030: 1029:Harry Furniss 1026: 1025: 1023: 1019: 1018: 1016: 1011: 1008: 1005: 1004: 1001: 998: 993: 991: 984: 981: 980: 979: 978: 975: 966: 962: 953: 949: 945: 941: 938: 935: 930: 923: 922: 921: 917: 913: 909: 908: 907: 906: 903: 898: 896: 884: 880: 879: 876: 871: 869: 859: 855: 851: 847: 844: 841: 838: 835: 834: 832: 828: 824: 820: 816: 812: 809: 806: 805: 803: 798: 793: 790: 789: 788: 786: 785: 774: 770: 766: 762: 758: 754: 750: 747: 743: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 732: 728: 724: 723: 720: 718: 713: 710: 707: 706: 701: 697: 693: 689: 688: 683: 682: 681: 677: 673: 666: 656: 646: 640:parameter to 632: 622: 612: 602: 596:, which uses 592: 585: 584: 576: 568: 560: 552: 547: 544: 543: 542: 541: 538: 535: 534: 530: 521: 517: 513: 509: 508: 505: 501: 497: 496: 491: 487: 483: 479: 473: 469: 465: 458: 451: 450: 445: 444: 439: 438: 437: 433: 429: 428:Sameboat - 同舟 424: 420: 416: 415: 414: 410: 406: 401: 400: 396: 392: 387: 386: 382: 381: 376: 372: 368: 364: 363: 361: 358: 357: 356: 355: 352: 351: 347: 343: 337: 333: 329: 325: 321: 317: 313: 308: 307: 303: 299: 295: 291: 287: 283: 279: 274: 273: 270: 266: 262: 258: 253: 252:museum's shop 249: 246:and Connor's 245: 241: 237: 232: 231: 229: 228:1-85414-219-4 226: 221: 207: 203: 199: 195: 194: 193: 189: 185: 180: 179: 178: 177: 176: 175: 174: 173: 172: 171: 170: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 150: 146: 142: 138: 134: 130: 119: 116: 114: 111: 109: 106: 105: 104: 103: 98: 93: 90: 85: 84: 80: 76: 70: 69: 66: 63: 60: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 1391: 1388: 1366: 1329:second image 1323: 1301:Brianboulton 1272:Brianboulton 1237:Brianboulton 1094: 1054: 1021: 1013: 1009: 1006: 986: 982: 960: 958: 894: 889: 867: 864: 830: 801: 796: 791: 783: 782: 781: 714: 708: 685: 581: 545: 531: 526: 503: 447: 441: 422: 383: 359: 348: 341: 340: 301: 247: 243: 239: 153: 152: 126: 113:Citation bot 72: 54:SandyGeorgia 49: 47: 35: 28: 1333:third image 1079:(for UK). 1022:unpublished 996:talk to me? 645:Superimpose 631:Superimpose 223:Transport. 1035:. The NPG 1007:Leaning to 846:Iridescent 655:BS-overlap 638:|base_alt= 621:BS-overlap 611:BS-overlap 1353:DavidCane 1286:DavidCane 1255:DavidCane 1209:DavidCane 1195:Jappalang 1180:DavidCane 1152:DavidCane 1138:Jappalang 1124:DavidCane 1099:DavidCane 1081:Jappalang 1041:DavidCane 989:Jimfbleak 959:Drive-by 944:DavidCane 912:DavidCane 850:DavidCane 815:DavidCane 792:The maps: 765:DavidCane 715:This ref 692:Eubulides 672:Eubulides 512:DavidCane 482:DavidCane 464:Eubulides 405:DavidCane 367:DavidCane 312:DavidCane 286:DavidCane 257:DavidCane 238:(Horne's 198:DavidCane 141:DavidCane 75:DavidCane 727:Ealdgyth 709:Comments 419:WP:ROUTE 385:Alt text 342:Comments 328:Fifelfoo 282:caissons 255:works.-- 184:Fifelfoo 158:Fifelfoo 154:Comments 108:Analysis 50:promoted 1367:Support 1070:PD-1923 1010:Support 983:Support 961:Support 784:Oppose. 583:Opening 564:and by 546:Comment 100:Toolbox 1059:Google 973:cent 2 970:irides 901:(talk) 874:(talk) 452:or to 156:1b/c: 933:scent 928:iride 797:still 626:uses 16:< 1374:talk 1357:talk 1342:talk 1305:talk 1290:talk 1276:talk 1259:talk 1241:talk 1213:talk 1199:talk 1184:talk 1156:talk 1142:talk 1128:talk 1103:talk 1085:talk 1045:talk 967:. – 965:here 948:talk 916:talk 895:Tony 868:Tony 854:talk 831:with 819:talk 769:talk 742:here 731:Talk 696:talk 676:talk 537:name 516:talk 486:talk 468:talk 432:talk 409:talk 371:talk 354:name 332:talk 316:talk 290:talk 261:talk 225:ISBN 202:talk 188:talk 162:talk 145:talk 135:and 79:talk 1061:or 1017::- 802:all 665:BS3 601:BS3 570:to 554:to 533:odd 504:all 350:odd 344:by 52:by 1376:) 1359:) 1344:) 1307:) 1292:) 1278:) 1261:) 1243:) 1215:) 1201:) 1186:) 1158:) 1144:) 1130:) 1105:) 1087:) 1073:}} 1067:{{ 1047:) 992:- 950:) 918:) 856:) 821:) 771:) 729:- 698:) 690:. 678:) 668:}} 662:{{ 658:}} 652:{{ 648:}} 642:{{ 634:}} 628:{{ 624:}} 618:{{ 614:}} 608:{{ 604:}} 598:{{ 594:}} 588:{{ 578:}} 572:{{ 562:}} 556:{{ 529:an 527:-- 518:) 488:) 470:) 462:. 460:}} 454:{{ 434:) 411:) 373:) 346:an 334:) 318:) 292:) 280:, 263:) 204:) 190:) 164:) 147:) 139:. 131:, 81:) 59:. 33:. 1372:( 1355:( 1340:( 1303:( 1288:( 1274:( 1257:( 1239:( 1211:( 1197:( 1182:( 1154:( 1140:( 1126:( 1101:( 1083:( 1057:( 1043:( 946:( 914:( 852:( 817:( 767:( 748:. 711:- 694:( 674:( 514:( 484:( 466:( 430:( 407:( 369:( 330:( 314:( 288:( 259:( 200:( 186:( 160:( 143:( 77:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
SandyGeorgia

Baker Street and Waterloo Railway
DavidCane
talk
01:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Featured article candidates/Baker Street and Waterloo Railway/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
City and South London Railway
Great Northern, Piccadilly and Brompton Railway
Charing Cross, Euston and Hampstead Railway
DavidCane
talk
01:08, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Fifelfoo
talk
01:36, 30 November 2009 (UTC)
Fifelfoo
talk
23:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)
DavidCane
talk
00:58, 4 January 2010 (UTC)
ISBN
1-85414-219-4

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑