Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured article candidates/Belle Vue Zoological Gardens/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

709:"Catering for visitors at Belle Vue was on an industrial scale, ranging from the late-19th century hot water rooms, which accommodated up to 3,000 diners each, providing crockery and hot water for those who brought their own picnics, to more up-market themed restaurants." confused me. Perhaps "Catering for visitors at Belle Vue was on an industrial scale, ranging from the late-19th century hot water rooms, which accommodated up to 3,000 diners each and provided crockery and hot water for those who brought their own picnics, to more up-market themed restaurants."? 698:"Before moving to Belle Vue, Jennison, a part-time gardener, had run a small aviary at his home, which was the beginnings of the zoo; over the years, Belle Vue grew to become the third-largest zoo in the UK." The interjections make this sentence quite choppy. Perhaps move "a part-time gardener" to another sentence? Consider "The brainchild of part-time gardener John Jennison," 353:
inquiry". Thankfully, however, this is hosted on en.wiki, so we only need to worry about the status in the US, which is verifiably PD per pre-1923 publication. I changed the license accordingly. If the source, however, actually says "unknown" instead of merely saying nothing, I think that would be sufficient to support the
264:- Certainly PD in the US due to pre-1923 publication (should have a license to that affect), but who is the author? How do we know s/he has been dead 70+ years (what if, for example, a 32-year-old created this - i.e. born in 1860 - and then lived to 81 - i.e. died in 1941?) Moving to en.wiki and using 462:
I agree that the image has something to contribute (I don't question NFCC#8), but the rationale doesn't really articulate a purpose. I assume, from its use in the infobox, that something to the effect of "to provide visual identification of the no longer existent subject" is intended, but I'm sure
625:"John, William, Angelo and Richard Jennison Jnr obtained sufficient shares to be appointed directors." - I don't understand this; how many shares do you need to be appointed a director? Its my understanding owning shares is not a prerequisite to being appointed to a board of directors, am I wrong? 352:
license works when the author is known and 70+ years have past since their death or when the author is unknown and 70+ years have past since creation. The wrinkle is that "unknown" doesn't mean "the source failed to provide that information", but that it could not be ascertained after "reasonable
173:
Over its 140-year existence, this refined place of entertainment for the genteel middle-classes, offering formal gardens and open-air dancing, evolved into the third-largest zoo in the UK, one of the earliest and largest amusement parks in the UK, a major venue for sports such as boxing, speedway,
387:
OK, thanks. Interesting distinction about "unknown" there. The source simply doesn't mention the photographer. I suspect it would have been an employee of the gardens, as the owners in those days liked to keep everything in house, but that's just speculation on my part.
602:
Thanks Brian. The source for the narrative in Note 1 was the one immediately following the note tag in the body of the article, but I've now repeated that in the note itself. I've also removed all of the locations in the bibliography, so it should be consistent now.
703:
I don't understand the use of "continued" here: "Music and dancing continued to be popular attractions in Belle Vue's various ballrooms." Perhaps "were continuously popular attractions?" Also, wouldn't the ballrooms be the attractions, and not the music and
649:
Thanks for your support. I think the whole paragraph about directors is referenced to Nicholls, (which I don't have) so I changed it to "were appointed to the board of directors ". I have tweaked the citation for footnote 99 to italicise "Manchester Evening
761:
I suppose on a re-read that my "Catering for visitors at Belle Vue" comment is largely irrelevant since the sentence can only function as written and any changes to the structure would alter the meaning. I defer to the judgment of others regarding commas.
117: 178:, the UK's oldest extant symphony orchestra ... the list goes on and on. Organising all of that material into an encyclopedic wikipedia article proved to be quite a challenge. I hope you think we made at least a decent fist of it. 622:
on the basis of criteria 1, 2 and 4. Good read; I thought I might struggle to read the whole article at first but it was surprisingly interesting, and easy to read. Couple of things though:
326:
was first published, so I've removed it, at least for now; although it's clearly a photo from the 1890s, the source I have in which it appears doesn't give a publication date.
236:- Needs a verifiable source. I can't imagine the failure of logic that thought this comment was acceptable: "Copyright status is unknown due to the age of the photograph" ( 463:
you both know better and could better articulate than I what the significance of the image is and why that's necessary for a reader to more fully understand the topic.
88: 83: 487: 261: 92: 671:. I made a few nitpicky comments (all now resolved), but other than that see no problems. I leave the matter of the images to those better qualified to comment. – 75: 40: 318:
Ah well, I suspected that the licences for at least some of the images would be problematic. For starters, I've sourced and given a publication date for
427: 255: 133: 30: 17: 775: 752: 732: 682: 659: 637: 610: 591: 553: 529: 514: 478: 453: 437: 417: 395: 378: 333: 304: 198: 185: 507:, and as I don't think fair use can be justified except in his own article I've removed it. Besides, I found the picture slightly spooky anyway. 519: 233: 174:
and greyhound racing, the largest exhibition space in the UK outside of London, a large concert venue that was at one time the home of
138: 443: 213: 79: 743:
Hi, many thanks for supporting. I made some edits which I hope address the issues you raised. Not sure about the commas though.--
407: 277: 323: 249: 71: 64: 607: 526: 511: 450: 434: 414: 392: 330: 182: 319: 280:- No source, no purpose articulated by the rationale. What is the significant contribution to our understanding? 243: 713:
I personally find a general overuse of commas, but I've been known to be mistaken about such things in the past.
446:
in the infobox, and I've given it my best shot at a fair use rationale, but if it has to go, then it has to go.
504: 285: 587: 423: 223: 604: 523: 508: 447: 431: 411: 389: 327: 179: 157: 677: 633: 549: 474: 374: 300: 577:
Consistency required over publisher locations in the bibliography (some books have it, some don't)
628:
In footnote 99, shouldn't "Manchester Evening News" be in italics, since it is a print source?
763: 720: 690:. I've been awaiting this FAC. Small niggling concerns, none of which would lead me to oppose. 583: 322:, which ought to make it legitimately public domain in the UK at least. I've got no idea when 53: 195: 227: 748: 672: 655: 165: 629: 539: 494: 464: 364: 357: 346: 290: 268: 218:
No source (WP:IUP/NFCC#6/NFCC#10A), no purpose articulated by the rationale (NFCC#10C).
430:
until acceptable copyright licences can be provided, if they ever can, which I doubt.
175: 109: 744: 651: 161: 410:
doesn't seem to add significantly to our understanding, so I've removed it.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
118:
Featured article candidates/Belle Vue Zoological Gardens/archive1
143: 105: 101: 97: 57: 503:
I agree with you about the nonsense PD rationale on
363:
license, but that isn't something that's necessary.
288:- Needs a verifiable source. Nonsense PD rationale. 785:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates 488:File:Belle vue zoological gardens plan 1892.jpg 262:File:Belle vue zoological gardens plan 1892.jpg 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 791:No further edits should be made to this page. 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 490:copied to wikipedia and licence changed to 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates 570:The narrative in Note 1 requires a source. 122: 428:File:Belle-Vue-guide-circa-late-1800s.jpg 256:File:Belle-Vue-guide-circa-late-1800s.jpg 408:File:Belle-Vue-Water-Chute-ad-1950s.jpg 278:File:Belle-Vue-Water-Chute-ad-1950s.jpg 194:—no dab links, no dead external links. 125: 115: 520:File:Belle-Vue-Helter-Skelter-1906.jpg 234:File:Belle-Vue-Helter-Skelter-1906.jpg 7: 24: 444:File:Belle-Vue--main-entrance.jpg 214:File:Belle-Vue--main-entrance.jpg 582:Otherwise, all sources look OK. 538:Image issues resolved. Thanks. 226:- Needs a verifiable source per 1: 324:File:Consul-II-the-chimp.jpg 258:- Needs a verifiable source. 252:- Needs a verifiable source. 250:File:Consul-II-the-chimp.jpg 246:- Needs a verifiable source. 72:Belle Vue Zoological Gardens 65:Belle Vue Zoological Gardens 31:featured article nomination 808: 776:17:36, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 753:16:30, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 733:15:19, 5 August 2010 (UTC) 683:22:06, 1 August 2010 (UTC) 660:15:13, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 638:13:59, 30 July 2010 (UTC) 611:00:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 592:23:54, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 554:20:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 530:20:22, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 515:17:39, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 479:14:03, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 454:04:52, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 438:02:16, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 422:Removed or commented out 418:00:35, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 396:00:43, 29 July 2010 (UTC) 379:18:33, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 334:17:02, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 320:File:Consul-the-chimp.jpg 305:16:20, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 244:File:Consul-the-chimp.jpg 199:16:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 186:15:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC) 788:Please do not modify it. 505:File:George-Lockhart.png 442:I'd really like to keep 286:File:George-Lockhart.png 274:would resolve the issue. 36:Please do not modify it. 424:File:John-Jennison.png 224:File:John-Jennison.png 56:19:30, 7 August 2010 209:per criterion three: 176:The Hallé Orchestra 522:has been removed. 772: 768: 729: 725: 169: 151: 150: 799: 790: 773: 770: 766: 730: 727: 723: 680: 675: 546: 499: 493: 471: 371: 362: 356: 351: 345: 297: 273: 267: 158:Malleus Fatuorum 154: 123: 113: 95: 48:The article was 38: 807: 806: 802: 801: 800: 798: 797: 796: 795: 786: 764: 721: 678: 673: 565:Sources comment 552: 540: 497: 491: 477: 465: 377: 365: 360: 354: 349: 343: 303: 291: 271: 265: 86: 70: 68: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 805: 803: 794: 793: 782: 781: 780: 779: 778: 756: 755: 717: 716: 715: 714: 711: 706: 700: 692: 691: 685: 665: 664: 663: 662: 645: 641: 640: 626: 623: 616: 615: 614: 613: 598: 580: 579: 572: 567: 561: 560: 559: 558: 557: 556: 548: 533: 532: 517: 501: 484: 483: 482: 481: 473: 457: 456: 440: 420: 403: 402: 401: 400: 399: 398: 382: 381: 373: 337: 336: 314: 310: 309: 308: 307: 299: 281: 275: 259: 253: 247: 241: 231: 220: 202: 201: 171: 170: 156:Nominator(s): 149: 148: 147: 146: 144:External links 141: 136: 128: 127: 121: 120: 67: 62: 61: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 804: 792: 789: 783: 777: 774: 760: 759: 758: 757: 754: 750: 746: 742: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 731: 712: 710: 707: 705: 701: 699: 696: 695: 694: 693: 689: 686: 684: 681: 676: 670: 667: 666: 661: 657: 653: 648: 647: 646: 643: 642: 639: 635: 631: 627: 624: 621: 618: 617: 612: 609: 606: 601: 600: 599: 596: 595: 594: 593: 589: 585: 578: 575: 574: 571: 568: 566: 563: 562: 555: 551: 547: 545: 544: 537: 536: 535: 534: 531: 528: 525: 521: 518: 516: 513: 510: 506: 502: 500:as suggested. 496: 489: 486: 485: 480: 476: 472: 470: 469: 461: 460: 459: 458: 455: 452: 449: 445: 441: 439: 436: 433: 429: 425: 421: 419: 416: 413: 409: 406:I agree that 405: 404: 397: 394: 391: 386: 385: 384: 383: 380: 376: 372: 370: 369: 359: 348: 341: 340: 339: 338: 335: 332: 329: 325: 321: 317: 316: 315: 312: 311: 306: 302: 298: 296: 295: 289: 287: 283: 282: 279: 276: 270: 263: 260: 257: 254: 251: 248: 245: 242: 239: 235: 232: 229: 225: 222: 219: 215: 212: 211: 210: 208: 204: 203: 200: 197: 193: 190: 189: 188: 187: 184: 181: 177: 168: 167: 163: 159: 153: 152: 145: 142: 140: 137: 135: 132: 131: 130: 129: 124: 119: 116: 114: 111: 107: 103: 99: 94: 90: 85: 81: 77: 73: 66: 63: 60: 58: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 787: 784: 740: 718: 708: 702: 697: 687: 668: 619: 584:Brianboulton 581: 576: 573: 569: 564: 542: 541: 467: 466: 367: 366: 293: 292: 284: 237: 221: 217: 206: 205: 191: 172: 155: 139:Citation bot 69: 54:SandyGeorgia 49: 47: 35: 28: 166:WebHamster 543:Эlcobbola 468:Эlcobbola 368:Эlcobbola 294:Эlcobbola 719:Cheers. 704:dancing? 650:News".-- 608:Fatuorum 527:Fatuorum 512:Fatuorum 451:Fatuorum 435:Fatuorum 415:Fatuorum 393:Fatuorum 331:Fatuorum 183:Fatuorum 134:Analysis 50:promoted 767:OCTURNE 724:OCTURNE 688:Support 669:Support 644:Replies 620:Support 605:Malleus 597:Replies 524:Malleus 509:Malleus 448:Malleus 432:Malleus 412:Malleus 390:Malleus 328:Malleus 313:Replies 192:Comment 180:Malleus 126:Toolbox 89:protect 84:history 228:WP:IUP 207:Oppose 196:Ucucha 93:delete 745:J3Mrs 741:Reply 679:scent 674:iride 652:J3Mrs 495:PD-US 358:PD-UK 347:PD-UK 269:PD-US 162:J3Mrs 110:views 102:watch 98:links 16:< 749:talk 656:talk 634:talk 588:talk 550:talk 475:talk 426:and 375:talk 342:The 301:talk 106:logs 80:talk 76:edit 771:OIR 728:OIR 630:Tom 238:!!! 52:by 751:) 658:) 636:) 590:) 498:}} 492:{{ 361:}} 355:{{ 350:}} 344:{{ 272:}} 266:{{ 240:). 216:- 164:, 160:, 108:| 104:| 100:| 96:| 91:| 87:| 82:| 78:| 59:. 33:. 769:ɳ 765:ɳ 747:( 726:ɳ 722:ɳ 654:( 632:( 586:( 230:. 112:) 74:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
featured article nomination
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
SandyGeorgia

Belle Vue Zoological Gardens
Belle Vue Zoological Gardens
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured article candidates/Belle Vue Zoological Gardens/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Malleus Fatuorum
J3Mrs
WebHamster
The Hallé Orchestra
Malleus
Fatuorum
15:48, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
Ucucha
16:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)
File:Belle-Vue--main-entrance.jpg

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.