1388:
appreciated... Kurt Gänzl writes in The
Encyclopedia of the Musical Theatre that... In his 1981 study of Offenbach, Alexander Faris writes, "Orphée..." Of these one "wrote" refers to a living writer, and one "writes" to a dead one. One or two of these "writes/wrote" could perhaps be switched, and in fact I dithered about the choice for M. Lasalle's quotation, but on the whole the choice of tense seems to pick itself according to the context. And note that at the PR nobody has been troubled enough by it to mention the inconsistency. In short, I think either "writes" or "wrote" is acceptable in the sentence in question, and it is a matter of personal stylistic preference. I hope that satisfactorily confuses the issue. –
226:
Met in 1981, but I've not added that. I am not familiar with your citation template though, so I'm afraid you might need to go through and standardise the references I've added (currently numbered 2, 3 and 4). As a final note, cite 2 is a bit odd; his parents' names are included on his gravestone, a photograph of which is available at the Getty
Foundation and I've linked to it; the Foundation explicitly states in the caption that it belongs to "Blair Peach, who died in the Southall, West London, demonstrations against the National Front on April 23rd 1979, by a blow to the head." An unusual source, but I think perfectly acceptable. Cheers and good luck with the nom, —
1155:"In the late 1950s—a decade after the partition of India—many of those who had been displaced by the events lost land and savings in the movement of people from their homelands into new areas." How about 'In the late 1950s many of those who had been displaced by the partition of India a decade before emigrated to the UK.' I am honestly not sure whether you are trying to say that they lost land etc during partition or when they moved to "new areas". But I don't see how any of that is relevant. I don't even see how the background of some - you don't quantify - immigrants is relevant, but if you do I can be flexible.
2114:"After Stephenson announced the Metropolitan police would publish the Cass report, Murray stated that he believed that he was the officer referred to in the report as "Officer E". -- awkward, especially around the that/that part. "After Stephenson's announcement that the Metropolitan police would publish the Cass report, Murray stated that he believed he was the officer referred to in the report as "Officer E".
1018:"Instead of holding the trials locally, they were held 25 miles (40 km) away in Barnet." How unusual was this? In the area of the UK where I live, it has long been the case that high profile cases are not tried in the area where they are alleged to have taken place. If it was not unusual then add something such as 'as was normal practice in such cases'. If it was not, then could you cite this.
993:"and the Labour government" I assume that this refers to the UK Government? It would, IMO, be more appropriate to label it as such. If there is some point to be made as to which political party was in power, could it be made more openly. I note that when Ealing London Borough Council was mentioned earlier in the article, the party or parties in power did not come up.
356:
2100:"In early 1980 sections of the Cass report..." -- this makes it sound like the report was written sectionally over a period of decades. Is there a way of avoiding this? I know its the American comma, but here I think it would work. Failing that, get rid of "In early 1980" as it soon becomes obvious with "January 1980 and "March 1980".
1679:"That June the Metropolitan Police commissioner, Sir Paul Stephenson announced that Cass's report and supporting documentation would be released. The parallels in the deaths of the two men proved to be the catalyst in the release of the Cass report to the public." IMO it would be beneficial to swap the order of these sentences.
1900:. It is an issue I was quite exercised about at the time, and it has brought me to a steady simmer several times since. You have clearly put an enormous amount of work into the article and it was a privilege to be able to contribute my smidgen. (That said, if you happen to feel like dropping by my A class nomination
1382:
It's an odd convention I suppose, a sort of variation on the historic present, and even those who adhere to it interpret it differently. Some people apply it only to recent-ish publications, and others use it for everything. From a quick search of Google books: "according to what Julius Caesar writes
1318:
How unusual was this? In the area of the UK where I live, it has long been the case that high profile cases are not tried in the area where they are alleged to have taken place. If it was not unusual then add something such as 'as was normal practice in such cases'. If it was not, then could you cite
1184:
over fourteen million people were impoverished. From the late 1950' on many of them relocated again in search of more prosperous lives.' Nothing special about those words, but I feel that you are trying to pack a novella into a single sentence, so cutting the information to what a reader really needs
1510:
Because it wouldn't be correct. In 1978 the SPG comprised 1,347 members, of whom 204 served in the Met, the others elsewhere (including 368 in the RUC). Reading the above makes it appear that there were only 204 members anywhere. I'll tweak the existing para to include info about the number overall.
2209:
Formats: There is an issue of italicasation of non-print sources in the refs. See 2 (Getty Images); 28 and 34 (Metropolitan Police
Service); 44, 67, 111, 120, (BBC); 48 (Birkbeck); 133 (National Union of Teachers); 139 (Shazam). I believe these should be de-italicised. BBC is also italicised in the
225:
I hope you don't mind, but I've added his parents' names (which I believe are standard in biographical articles/summaries yet missing in his ODNB entry) and the names of his brothers, one of whom (Roy) was a solicitor and led the legal campaign after Blair's death; their mother Janet also sued the
594:
I think you've got all the singular-v-plurals right. Some would write "the family was", but I'm with you in making them plural. While I was checking the current text I noticed (smack handies for not spotting it before) that you are inconsistent with the definite articles of newspaper titles: the
1387:
I see I have said "Albert
Lasalle, in his history of the Bouffes-Parisiens (1860) wrote that ... In 1999 Thomas Schipperges wrote in the International Journal ... Félix Clément and Pierre Larousse wrote in their Dictionnaire des Opéras (1881) that ..." but "Peter Gammond writes that the public
1913:
I was about to sign off with a support when I noticed "Cass considered that he had identified the individual whom he considered most likely to have hit Peach" Two times "considered". I have boldly edited the first one to 'decided' so as not to hold things up, but feel free to revert or make a
110:
officers. No-one was ever charged with his death and it is unlikely that the actual culprit will ever be formally identified. The case was high-profile at the time, and it has been mentioned numerous times since, normally when there is a death related to police action. This has gone through a
854:"One house on Park View Road was used as a first aid post; the building was also the headquarters of Peoples Unite" "one" needs to be 'a' and the sentence seems messy. How does something like 'A house on Park View Road, the headquarters of Peoples Unite, was used as a first aid post' sound?
721:"In the late 1950s—a decade after the partition of India—many of those who had been displaced by the events lost land and savings in the movement of people from their homelands into new areas." Umm. Possibly this has lost a word or three somewhere along the way while being copy edited?
1383:
in his
Commentaries", "Julius Caesar writes of iron nails", "Julius Caesar writes about the transmigration of the souls in Celtic religion". My own use of the idiom is arbitrary, I'm afraid. I use "write" or "wrote" according to what feels right in each case. In my current overhaul of
135:—it’s not immediately clear in the lead (versus the body) that this similar account led to the release of the report into Peach’s death. I think this should either be made clearer or Tomlinson’s death should be moved into the subsequent paragraph detailing the legacy of the incident.
2008:"Racial discrimination in the workplace was common, and 85% of those Asian workers who had been given entry into the UK on the basis of their education or training, were only employed in unskilled or semi-skilled roles." -- and here. An obvious semicolon would work better here, IMO.
474:"The BNP's successor, the National Front" – I see what you mean, of course, but is "successor" quite accurate? In present-day terms, is the Brexit party the "successor" to UKIP? One gang following a moribund predecessor gang, but I think "successor" implies some sort of hand-over.
2011:
Did all forces have units called "SPG"? Only the Met have what is called the "TSG", now, with other forces having units using different names. I'm led to believe that some don't have a support group/public order unit at all now and rely solely on level two aid deployments.
791:"As the number of demonstrators at the town hall rose, the crowd contained what the police considered militant elements." That doesn't really work. Perhaps 'The number of demonstrators at the town hall rose, and included some whom the police considered militant elements'?
481:
The original BNP (1960–1967) help form the
National Front when it imploded, with a large chunk of the party joining with a couple of other far-right knuckle-draggers to form the new organisation. I think there are some reliable sources that use the "successor" tag too. -
1325:
I see your point. Hopefully you see mine. If we are accusing the
British judicial system of attempting to rig the system against the accused - something I am personally willing to believe - we need to nail it down with a couple of very reliable sources IMO.
2005:"Some of the early arrivals found work at the R. Woolf and Co Rubber factory and by 1965 all the lower level workers were from Poland or the Indian subcontinent." -- I'm really not sure of the conjunction here. I don't think it works with what precedes it.
1673:"as only the coroner and police lawyers had copies of the report, "it was impossible for anyone ... to obtain a complete picture of the evidence" However well cited, this is clearly incorrect, as the coroner and the police lawyers would have been able to.
768:
yeah-but, no-but... By '78 the SPG model was being used by forces outside the Met, so we need it there for clarity. (If you think a line would be beneficial to say the model was used in other forces, let me know and I'll dig out the sources again. -
2037:"... regardless of what they were doing, and there were subsequent complaints of racist and sexist abuse by the police." -- those police are a precious lot, aren't they. Surely they're used to such abuse? Or were they the ones dishing it out?
1792:
1901:
1025:'High profile' tends to mean a major crime which goes to the regional crown court. These cases were small stuff, so should have been the local magistrates court. I'll dig out the info and add as appropriate. -
1322:'High profile' tends to mean a major crime which goes to the regional crown court. These cases were small stuff, so should have been the local magistrates court. I'll dig out the info and add as appropriate.
902:"At about 7:30 pm Peach, along with four friends decided that they would return to their cars" Needs tweaking. Possibly 'At about 7:30 pm Peach, along with four friends, decided to return to their cars ...'?
785:"Accusations were made that the police were inappropriately violent towards those demonstrating against a National Front march." Is this connected to the previous sentence? It seems to spring out of nowhere.
506:
Capitals are, I know, a headache for the scrupulous writer, but I do wonder why commissioner of the
Metropolitan Police but Director of Public Prosecutions. (I'd capitalise Commissioner, but that's just my
2213:
Quality and reliability: The sources include books, reports, articles and online sites, and appear to be very comprehensive. In my view they meet the required FA criteria for quality and reliability.
1676:"the Peach case is an example where "compensation is ... paid in tacit admission that a wrong had been committed." As the quote is not a full sentence, the full stop should be outside the quote marks.
150:
Many thanks David. I've added a sentence to link the
Tomlinson death and release. Does that look OK to you as is? It may be that others would prefer it in the later paragraph, but we'll see. Cheers -
2015:
Most had an SPG, even if they were only 11 officers (like
Derbyshire's). The source I have says Glos, Norfolk and Notts were the only English forces without one, and neither did Central Scotland. -
1816:
I was a bit surprised by it too. I think it's something that happened with the release of some works as ebooks - not entirely sure, but I was looking for the oclc number when I came across this. -
2117:"In 2010 Andy Hayman, the former assistant commissioner for Specialist Operations at the Metropolitan Police wrote..." -- is there a closing comma missing from the end of Hayman's introduction?
1682:"The journalists Mark Hughes and Cahal Milmo see that the action of the SPG "became a symbol of police corruption"." Grammar issues. 'The journalists Mark Hughes and Cahal Milmo considered
503:
I don't press the point, but there is a certain amount of in-and-out running in singular-v-plural for groups: e.g. "The SPG was disbanded .. the National Front announced that they would..."
2121:
That's my lot. A very balanced article, and a good read, albeit a difficult one at times (emotionally, you understand, and by no-means a slur on your shoddy prose), executed sensitively.
532:"Despite statements by the police and the Labour government" – it seems a touch tendentious to say "the Labour government", as if a Tory one would have been sans peur et sans reproche.
536:
Those are all my points on the prose. The content of the article seems to me balanced, comprehensive and well-referenced. I shall look in again to, I hope and expect, add my support.
765:"In 1978 there were 204 members of the SPG in the Metropolitan Police Service." "in the Metropolitan Police Service" is redundant, the first sentence of the section covers this.
331:
Thanks Nikkimaria. I don't know, I'm afraid. I went with what the newspaper say it is (the press are normally excellent about ensuring the licencing is correct for images). -
2164:
2034:"Approximately 1,200 police officers were on duty along the five-mile (eight-kilometre) route, at which 19 people were arrested." -- Is it possible to be at a route or on it?
1841:
Caption: "Ian Tomlinson, just after being struck to the ground by police. His death was the catalyst for the release of the Cass report" There should be a terminal full stop.
1486:
1756:
The second para is a bit too far away for many to remember, so I've left it as full in the final section, but tweaked so it is not repeated twice in quick succession. -
1744:"to commemorate the former NUT member" If you are going to use an abbreviation, you should put it in brackets after the first use of the in full of the term abbreviated.
1368:
He'll pipe up shortly, but as the text is extant and the opinion not withdrawn, it is still the "current" position of the author. All allowable in grammatical terms. -
1878:, Again, many thanks for these comments - I am very grateful indeed. If there are any that I have missed, or you think need more work on, please let me know. Cheers -
576:, I think I've covered these now (although I'm not sure I've made it worse in doing so!) Could you cast your eye over and see if I've brushed it up sufficiently? Ta -
746:"During local elections of the 1960s anti-immigration rhetoric was used by some candidates, successfully in many cases." Can you cite "successfully in many cases"?
883:
659:
now. I see a source review is wanted. If no-one more expert volunteers I'll have one of my occasional goes at source reviewing, using BB's wise guidance.
40:
286:
Thanks Noswall59. I've tweaked the text just a little to reflect the sources a bit more closely and turned the citations into the right forms. Cheers -
1715:
Apologies. I put the emphasis in the wrong place. I was attempting, ineptly, to suggest that 'considered' might convey your meaning better than "see".
354:
269:
1936:
A magnificent article. Well-written, solidly cited to a wide range of sources, neutral, even in trying circumstances, and comprehensive. Happy to
1255:"Southall" The second and third sentences start with "Many", as does the last clause of the first sentence. Would some variation be possible?
788:"After bad press" It may just be me, but that does not read as encyclopedic. If only for want of a verb. Possibly 'After receiving bad press'?
2253:
1629:
1610:
1591:
1569:
1550:
743:"Southall" The second and third sentences start with "Many", as does the last clause of the first sentence. Would some variation be possible?
30:
17:
2264:
1162:
The point is that the relocation of 10 million+ people meant that many lost land and property and ended up coming to the UK as a result. -
921:"radioed to the central control that there was a riot in progress" This seems to need a word after "control": 'point', 'room', whatever.
133:
In 2009 Ian Tomlinson died after he was struck from behind by a member of the Territorial Support Group, the SPG's successor organisation
2287:
2240:
2222:
2191:
2176:
2154:
2135:
2090:
2075:
2050:
2024:
1987:
1966:
1951:
1926:
1887:
1868:
1853:
1825:
1804:
1765:
1727:
1702:
1520:
1445:
1403:
1377:
1338:
1302:
1274:
1237:
1201:
1171:
1141:
1120:
1101:
1063:
1034:
1009:
984:
967:
933:
914:
895:
870:
841:
810:
778:
758:
733:
698:
674:
646:
628:
585:
568:
551:
523:
491:
445:
427:
389:
367:
340:
322:
295:
281:
235:
211:
197:
170:
159:
141:
120:
90:
1075:
Note g: "A sample list of the weapons found in the lockers of Unit 1-1's members, included" I don't think that the comma is necessary.
1433:
OK. In which case how about 'Cass considered that he had identified the individual whom he considered most likely to have hit Peach.
718:
a single event, but not "a" catalyst - that would imply that it is one of several which is not chemically nor grammatically allowed.
2058:"It reconvened on 25 May 1979 and again was adjourned" -- "It reconvened on 25 May 1979 and was again adjourned" is a bit crisper.
1408:
Thank you Tim. As muddy as a very muddy substance. In brief SC, it would seem that you can go for whichever variant you prefer.
514:
I've followed your suggestion. I go round in circles trying to work out what the MoS are saying on whatever day of the week. -
436:
I've emailed the pictures department to ask on what basis they show it as PD. I suspect we may be in for a long wait! Cheers -
1582:
2081:
Excellent stuff, cheers. All done, except the one point where I've clarified the extent of the SPG 'model' at the time. -
276:
2103:"...but the calls were turned down by the government." -- I should imagine the calls weren't, but the public inquiry was.
1859:
Covered, except where commented on. Thanks again - although I know I need to cover a couple of points from further up. -
1489:
officers which supported local areas, particularly when policing serious crime and civil disturbances. The SPG comprised
710:"the parallels in the deaths proved to be a catalyst in the release of the Cass report to the public." Something can be
1957:
That's very kind of you, thank you. I am most indebted to you, and will return the reviewing favour shortly. Cheers -
1590:
sfn error: no target: CITEREF"History_of_the_Metropolitan_Police:_Special_Patrol_Group"._Metropolitan_Police_Service (
248:
353:
That has... very much not been my experience. The same image appears to have been used in contemporary protests (eg
1072:"the eve of Peach's funeral" Redundant, given that the following sentence starts "The following day he was buried"
185:
2061:"PC Raymond White, PC James Scottow and PC Anthony Richardson" -- could we get away with PCs and then the names?
262:
106:
where he received a blow on the head that killed him. This was, in all probability, from one of a possible six
2167:, and the considerable degree of fine tuning that has occurred during this FAC. A source review will follow.
2110:"...including the BBC, of producing what he described as "biased propaganda" -- The BBC, who'd have thought!
1753:
Which would be either the last line of the lead, or the second paragraph of the main article. Your choice.
817:
Caption: "the green arrows shows Peach's direction of travel while trying to leave the area" "shows" -: -->
2218:
2172:
1947:
1849:
1116:
963:
202:
Many thanks, Wehwalt - I'm much obliged to you for your time and comments at PR and again here. Cheers -
2282:
1423:"Cass considered that he had identified the likely individual who hit Peach" Is "likely" necessary here?
1085:"Cass considered that he had identified the likely individual who hit Peach" Is "likely" necessary here?
749:
It was part of the Karapin reference at the end of the next sentence, but split out now for clarity. -
1993:"During his studies he visited Britain and liked the country." -- Not List or Rutherford, presumably?
1466:
500:"After bad press, they were replaced" – "they" being District Support Units? It isn't crystal clear.
423:
363:
318:
107:
72:
944:"Beachcroft Avenue and as the SPG vans of Unit 3 drove to the junction" Delete either "and" or "as".
1653:
The original name was the Special Patrol Group Unit; this was renamed Special Patrol Group in 1965.
1470:
1396:
667:
621:
603:
544:
231:
103:
1917:
Good spot. I may tweak to "considered", but either of them are better than the duplicated word. -
1293:
Given the MoS's often bizarre approach to capitalisation... either way, it should be clear now. -
1214:"meant easily obtainable jobs" IMO this would read better as 'meant jobs were easily obtainable'.
559:
Many thanks Tim. Only the singular-v-plural point to deal with, but I'll go over those shortly. -
2236:
2187:
2150:
2086:
2046:
2020:
1962:
1922:
1883:
1864:
1821:
1800:
1761:
1723:
1698:
1516:
1441:
1373:
1334:
1298:
1270:
1233:
1197:
1181:
1167:
1137:
1097:
1059:
1030:
1005:
980:
975:
All done, except where commented on above. Thank you for all these: they are excellent. Cheers -
929:
910:
891:
866:
837:
806:
774:
754:
740:"meant easily obtainable jobs" IMO this would read better as 'meant jobs were easily obtainable'.
729:
694:
642:
581:
564:
519:
487:
441:
385:
336:
291:
207:
155:
116:
86:
1977:
I am so sorry, I completely forgot about this. Reading through tonight...(not John Cass, obvs)
724:
I've re-written this several times, and deleted them all! How does this current version look? -
2214:
2168:
1943:
1875:
1845:
1180:
In which case perhaps something like: 'As a result of the population transfers after the 1947
1112:
959:
313:
site as attribution rather than release. Any idea what the original source of this image was?
193:
1473:; In 1978 it consisted of 204 members, divided into six units, each of which contained three
1092:
I think so. Cass put a list of six and said "in order of likelihood" or something similar. -
2275:
2257:
1078:"including for Officer F and Officer G and Officer I" Should the first "and" not be a comma?
165:
136:
61:
53:
1430:
I think so. Cass put a list of six and said "in order of likelihood" or something similar.
613:. Not a matter of grave import, but it would be as well to stick to the same form for all.
1498:
1494:
419:
377:
359:
314:
1365:
Mr Riley is a renown semi-literate. Ask him if he would care to reconsider his position.
2256:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
470:
I think I shall be supporting, but a few minor points first, as I ducked out of the PR:
2142:
2128:
2106:"...concern at the way Burton conducted the inquest. One concern..." -- concern/concern
2068:
1980:
1490:
1391:
1359:
1051:
662:
616:
573:
539:
254:
227:
1313:
Instead of holding the trials locally, they were held 25 miles (40 km) away in Barnet.
2232:
2183:
2146:
2082:
2042:
2016:
1958:
1918:
1897:
1879:
1860:
1817:
1796:
1757:
1719:
1694:
1512:
1437:
1369:
1330:
1294:
1266:
1229:
1193:
1163:
1133:
1093:
1055:
1026:
1001:
976:
925:
906:
887:
862:
833:
802:
770:
750:
725:
690:
638:
577:
560:
515:
483:
437:
381:
332:
287:
203:
151:
112:
82:
1290:
If it had had upper case Cs in the article I wouldn't have queried it. Just saying.
951:"25 members of the public were also injured, of which Peach was one." "which" -: -->
597:
189:
924:
I think it was just called "Central Control", but I've added "unit" to clarify. -
132:
2271:
794:"The police decided to make a sterile cordon around the town hall" "make" -: -->
111:
thorough re-write recently, and any further comments are most welcome. Cheers –
99:
57:
1283:
I think it was just called "Central Control", but I've added "unit" to clarify.
1667:"Cass finished the investigation fully in February 1980" "fully" is redundant.
886:). I've moved one of the citations adjacent to make the quote clearer too. -
821:"between 5:30 and 6:30 pm violence rose" Possibly a personal preference, but
261:
nothing, I think SC is out raising money for the Police Benevolent Fund atm.
1502:
1482:
1478:
609:
2206:
Links: all links to sources are working, per the external link checker tool
1693:
What are you saying to change? The sentence already has "that" in there. -
2182:
Many thanks Brian. You PR comments were very helpful, as always. Cheers -
1838:
Ideally Gilroy should have the page range of the article or chapter given.
689:
Many thanks Tim. As always, your comments are extremely helpful. Cheers -
1474:
825:
violence 'rise'? 'the violence increased'? the level of violence rose'?
801:
Both, according to the police report! I've tweaked to put all plural -
414:
publication cited, although the original source is unclear. Might the
410:
The use of the image in those protests suggests that it predates the
309:
File:Blair_Peach.jpg: I read the statement re: public domain on the
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
2031:"...meeting hall. The day before the meeting..." -- meeting/meeting
1778:
Note g: "Figures for the actual number vary. "actual" is redundant.
1351:"writes that while initially 90% of the defendants" "writes" -: -->
1043:"writes that while initially 90% of the defendants" "writes" -: -->
1904:
then please feel free. I learnt this shameless approach from Tim.)
2145:. All your suggestions taken on board and duly sorted. Cheers -
1784:: Butler and King 1965 and 1966 are too early to have had ISBNs.
1185:
to know may help, as might spreading it out over two sentences.
1686:
the action of the SPG "became a symbol of police corruption".'?
1670:"during that time" You haven't given a time , just an end date.
1458:
Why not reorder the first paragraph of Special Patrol Group as:
418:
have more information on where the photo came from originally?
2231:
Many thanks once again Brian. All now de-italicised. Cheers -
1813:
Well, well; live and learn. I am astonished and enlightened.
1081:"shaved off his moustache which he had that day" "his" -: -->
1583:"History of the Metropolitan Police: Special Patrol Group".
879:"'peaceful English hamlet'" Why the additional quote marks.
798:"a sterile cordon"; "The cordons were". Singular or plural?
940:"There were a group of 100 to 150 protesters" "were" -: -->
1469:(SPG) was formed in 1961 as a specialist squad within the
850:"which triggered the reaction from the crowd" "the" -: -->
1999:"...many of them relocated again." -- do we need "again"?
1485:. It provided a mobile, centrally controlled reserve of
1225:
1189:
65:
1493:capable of working as disciplined teams preventing
637:Many thanks Tim - duly tweaked to be consistent. -
2295:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
1497:, targeting areas of serious crime, carrying out
1188:That's better. I've added a slight variant to it
1996:"From the late 1950s on..." -- do we need "on"?
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
2125:unconditionally, with regards to my comments.
1576:
2301:No further edits should be made to this page.
2270:template in place on the talk page until the
1628:sfn error: no target: CITEREFWaddington1994 (
1265:Ditto - swapped out one of them for "some" -
947:"He was rapidly operated on" "rapidly" -: -->
832:Personal or not, I've gone with it anyway. -
358:), though of course without any attribution.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
2002:"Many Sikhs and Hindus left..." -- Many/many
1128:Again, all done except where commented on.
795:'set up' or similar? 'create'? 'establish'?
1623:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
2096:Continuing with coroners inquest down...
1609:sfn error: no target: CITEREFBrain2010 (
1568:sfn error: no target: CITEREFRollo1980 (
1549:sfn error: no target: CITEREFJoyce2010 (
1646:
1537:
2041:Bloody snowflakes, the lot of them! -
1256:
1215:
1000:swapped for "incumbent government". -
882:That's how they are in the quote (see
1604:
1563:
1544:
1246:I am clearly going senile. Apologies.
102:attended a demonstration against the
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
1130:I'll dig out the court info shortly
257:, that's all useful stuff, cheers;
1718:Ah, OK - swapped for "consider" -
1257:Neither commented on nor actioned.
1216:Neither commented on nor actioned.
380:, What are you suggesting here? -
24:
851:'a'. (Or specify what "the" was.)
1481:. Each unit was commanded by an
1:
2065:Stopping for now, more soon.
1501:, or providing a response to
1224:Yep - it was already done in
2265:featured article candidates
1791:Retrospectively provided –
1585:Metropolitan Police Service
31:featured article nomination
2318:
98:Just over forty years ago
2203:No spotchecks carried out
167:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
138:Der Wohltemperierte Fuchs
2298:Please do not modify it.
2288:11:37, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
2241:19:45, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
2223:19:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
2192:10:32, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
2177:10:18, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
2155:13:57, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
2136:18:29, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
2091:20:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
2076:20:31, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
2051:20:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
2025:20:51, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
1988:19:46, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
1967:11:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1952:10:21, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1927:11:57, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1888:09:45, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1869:23:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1854:22:45, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1826:09:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1805:23:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1766:09:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1728:09:44, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1703:23:01, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1521:07:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1446:07:34, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1404:07:37, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1378:23:03, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1339:22:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1303:22:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1275:22:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1238:22:28, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1202:09:26, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
1172:22:46, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1142:20:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1121:19:17, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1102:20:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1064:20:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1035:20:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
1010:20:20, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
985:20:06, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
968:18:27, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
948:'promptly' (or similar).
934:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
915:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
896:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
871:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
842:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
811:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
779:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
759:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
734:20:05, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
699:10:32, 24 May 2019 (UTC)
675:08:24, 23 May 2019 (UTC)
647:11:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
629:10:46, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
586:09:33, 14 May 2019 (UTC)
569:19:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
552:21:26, 12 May 2019 (UTC)
524:19:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
492:19:32, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
446:14:06, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
428:20:26, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
390:19:29, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
368:15:25, 18 May 2019 (UTC)
341:19:34, 13 May 2019 (UTC)
323:21:13, 11 May 2019 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
2165:my peer review comments
1150:Carried down from above
705:Support by Gog the Mild
296:07:41, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
282:13:13, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
253:, but if i may say so,
236:12:52, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
220:Comments from Noswall59
212:07:41, 9 May 2019 (UTC)
198:05:01, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
171:21:44, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
160:19:01, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
142:17:10, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
121:08:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
91:08:33, 7 May 2019 (UTC)
2210:list of News articles.
1902:Battle of Cape Ecnomus
861:Much better, thanks -
126:Comment by David Fuchs
1054:suggests "writes". -
188:at the peer review.--
1467:Special Patrol Group
1329:Done this already -
186:my detailed comments
108:Special Patrol Group
73:Death of Blair Peach
1471:Metropolitan Police
1362:suggests "writes".
604:The Daily Telegraph
1973:Comments from Cass
1914:different change.
1182:partition of India
2111:
2053:
1499:stop and searches
252:
94:
2309:
2300:
2285:
2280:
2274:goes through. --
2269:
2263:
2260:, and leave the
2163:on the basis of
2133:
2131:
2109:
2073:
2071:
2040:
1985:
1983:
1740:"Sus law" -: -->
1654:
1651:
1634:
1633:
1621:
1615:
1614:
1602:
1596:
1595:
1580:
1574:
1573:
1561:
1555:
1554:
1542:
1401:
1399:
1394:
1109:Taking a break.
956:More to follow.
672:
670:
665:
626:
624:
619:
549:
547:
542:
279:
274:
267:
246:
168:
139:
134:
79:
48:The article was
38:
2317:
2316:
2312:
2311:
2310:
2308:
2307:
2306:
2305:
2296:
2283:
2276:
2267:
2261:
2200:
2129:
2127:
2069:
2067:
1981:
1979:
1975:
1664:
1659:
1658:
1657:
1652:
1648:
1639:
1638:
1637:
1627:
1624:Waddington 1994
1622:
1618:
1608:
1603:
1599:
1589:
1581:
1577:
1567:
1566:, pp. 174, 204.
1562:
1558:
1548:
1543:
1539:
1495:public disorder
1491:police officers
1397:
1392:
1390:
1152:
707:
668:
663:
661:
622:
617:
615:
545:
540:
538:
468:
306:
277:
270:
263:
166:
137:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2315:
2313:
2304:
2303:
2291:
2290:
2246:
2245:
2244:
2243:
2226:
2225:
2211:
2207:
2204:
2199:
2198:Sources review
2196:
2195:
2194:
2158:
2157:
2119:
2118:
2115:
2112:
2107:
2104:
2101:
2094:
2093:
2063:
2062:
2059:
2056:
2055:
2054:
2035:
2032:
2029:
2028:
2027:
2009:
2006:
2003:
2000:
1997:
1994:
1974:
1971:
1970:
1969:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1930:
1929:
1908:
1907:
1906:
1905:
1891:
1890:
1872:
1871:
1843:
1842:
1839:
1835:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1831:
1830:
1829:
1828:
1808:
1807:
1786:
1785:
1779:
1775:
1774:
1773:
1772:
1771:
1770:
1769:
1768:
1746:
1745:
1742:
1737:
1736:
1735:
1734:
1733:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1708:
1707:
1706:
1705:
1688:
1687:
1680:
1677:
1674:
1671:
1668:
1663:
1662:Act 2, scene 1
1660:
1656:
1655:
1645:
1644:
1640:
1636:
1635:
1616:
1597:
1575:
1556:
1536:
1535:
1531:
1530:
1529:
1528:
1527:
1526:
1525:
1524:
1523:
1460:
1459:
1455:
1454:
1453:
1452:
1451:
1450:
1449:
1448:
1425:
1424:
1420:
1419:
1418:
1417:
1416:
1415:
1414:
1413:
1412:
1411:
1410:
1409:
1354:
1353:
1348:
1347:
1346:
1345:
1344:
1343:
1342:
1341:
1315:
1314:
1310:
1309:
1308:
1307:
1306:
1305:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1279:
1278:
1277:
1260:
1259:
1252:
1251:
1250:
1249:
1248:
1247:
1241:
1240:
1219:
1218:
1211:
1210:
1209:
1208:
1207:
1206:
1205:
1204:
1175:
1174:
1157:
1156:
1151:
1148:
1147:
1146:
1145:
1144:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1087:
1086:
1083:
1079:
1076:
1073:
1069:
1068:
1067:
1066:
1046:
1045:
1040:
1039:
1038:
1037:
1020:
1019:
1015:
1014:
1013:
1012:
995:
994:
990:
989:
988:
987:
954:
953:
949:
945:
942:
938:
937:
936:
919:
918:
917:
905:Yes, better -
900:
899:
898:
876:
875:
874:
873:
856:
855:
852:
847:
846:
845:
844:
827:
826:
819:
815:
814:
813:
796:
792:
789:
786:
783:
782:
781:
763:
762:
761:
744:
741:
738:
737:
736:
719:
706:
703:
702:
701:
686:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
679:
678:
677:
650:
649:
632:
631:
589:
588:
571:
534:
533:
529:
528:
527:
526:
509:
508:
504:
501:
497:
496:
495:
494:
476:
475:
467:
466:from Tim riley
460:
459:
458:
457:
456:
455:
454:
453:
452:
451:
450:
449:
448:
431:
430:
399:
398:
397:
396:
395:
394:
393:
392:
371:
370:
346:
345:
344:
343:
326:
325:
305:
302:
301:
300:
299:
298:
284:
240:
239:
217:
216:
215:
214:
178:
177:
176:
175:
174:
173:
164:Works for me.
145:
144:
128:
127:
104:National Front
96:
95:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
64:) 5 June 2019
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2314:
2302:
2299:
2293:
2292:
2289:
2286:
2281:
2279:
2273:
2266:
2259:
2255:
2251:
2248:
2247:
2242:
2238:
2234:
2230:
2229:
2228:
2227:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2212:
2208:
2205:
2202:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2189:
2185:
2181:
2180:
2179:
2178:
2174:
2170:
2166:
2162:
2156:
2152:
2148:
2144:
2140:
2139:
2138:
2137:
2134:
2132:
2124:
2116:
2113:
2108:
2105:
2102:
2099:
2098:
2097:
2092:
2088:
2084:
2080:
2079:
2078:
2077:
2074:
2072:
2060:
2057:
2052:
2048:
2044:
2039:
2038:
2036:
2033:
2030:
2026:
2022:
2018:
2014:
2013:
2010:
2007:
2004:
2001:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1991:
1990:
1989:
1986:
1984:
1972:
1968:
1964:
1960:
1956:
1955:
1954:
1953:
1949:
1945:
1941:
1939:
1928:
1924:
1920:
1916:
1915:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1903:
1899:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1892:
1889:
1885:
1881:
1877:
1874:
1873:
1870:
1866:
1862:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1851:
1847:
1840:
1837:
1836:
1827:
1823:
1819:
1815:
1814:
1812:
1811:
1810:
1809:
1806:
1802:
1798:
1794:
1790:
1789:
1788:
1787:
1783:
1780:
1777:
1776:
1767:
1763:
1759:
1755:
1754:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1748:
1747:
1743:
1739:
1738:
1729:
1725:
1721:
1717:
1716:
1714:
1713:
1712:
1711:
1710:
1709:
1704:
1700:
1696:
1692:
1691:
1690:
1689:
1685:
1681:
1678:
1675:
1672:
1669:
1666:
1665:
1661:
1650:
1647:
1643:
1631:
1625:
1620:
1617:
1612:
1606:
1601:
1598:
1593:
1587:
1586:
1579:
1571:
1565:
1560:
1557:
1552:
1546:
1541:
1538:
1534:
1522:
1518:
1514:
1509:
1508:
1507:
1506:
1504:
1500:
1496:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1476:
1472:
1468:
1464:
1463:
1462:
1461:
1457:
1456:
1447:
1443:
1439:
1435:
1434:
1432:
1431:
1429:
1428:
1427:
1426:
1422:
1421:
1407:
1406:
1405:
1402:
1400:
1395:
1386:
1381:
1380:
1379:
1375:
1371:
1367:
1366:
1364:
1363:
1361:
1358:
1357:
1356:
1355:
1350:
1349:
1340:
1336:
1332:
1328:
1327:
1324:
1323:
1321:
1320:
1317:
1316:
1312:
1311:
1304:
1300:
1296:
1292:
1291:
1289:
1288:
1287:
1286:
1282:
1281:
1276:
1272:
1268:
1264:
1263:
1262:
1261:
1258:
1254:
1253:
1245:
1244:
1243:
1242:
1239:
1235:
1231:
1227:
1223:
1222:
1221:
1220:
1217:
1213:
1212:
1203:
1199:
1195:
1191:
1187:
1186:
1183:
1179:
1178:
1177:
1176:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1160:
1159:
1158:
1154:
1153:
1149:
1143:
1139:
1135:
1132:Now added. -
1131:
1127:
1126:
1125:
1124:
1123:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1110:
1103:
1099:
1095:
1091:
1090:
1089:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1074:
1071:
1070:
1065:
1061:
1057:
1053:
1050:
1049:
1048:
1047:
1042:
1041:
1036:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1023:
1022:
1021:
1017:
1016:
1011:
1007:
1003:
999:
998:
997:
996:
992:
991:
986:
982:
978:
974:
973:
972:
971:
970:
969:
965:
961:
957:
950:
946:
943:
939:
935:
931:
927:
923:
922:
920:
916:
912:
908:
904:
903:
901:
897:
893:
889:
885:
881:
880:
878:
877:
872:
868:
864:
860:
859:
858:
857:
853:
849:
848:
843:
839:
835:
831:
830:
829:
828:
824:
820:
816:
812:
808:
804:
800:
799:
797:
793:
790:
787:
784:
780:
776:
772:
767:
766:
764:
760:
756:
752:
748:
747:
745:
742:
739:
735:
731:
727:
723:
722:
720:
717:
713:
709:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
687:
676:
673:
671:
666:
658:
654:
653:
652:
651:
648:
644:
640:
636:
635:
634:
633:
630:
627:
625:
620:
612:
611:
606:
605:
600:
599:
593:
592:
591:
590:
587:
583:
579:
575:
572:
570:
566:
562:
558:
557:
556:
555:
554:
553:
550:
548:
543:
531:
530:
525:
521:
517:
513:
512:
511:
510:
505:
502:
499:
498:
493:
489:
485:
480:
479:
478:
477:
473:
472:
471:
465:
461:
447:
443:
439:
435:
434:
433:
432:
429:
425:
421:
417:
413:
409:
408:
407:
406:
405:
404:
403:
402:
401:
400:
391:
387:
383:
379:
375:
374:
373:
372:
369:
365:
361:
357:
355:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
342:
338:
334:
330:
329:
328:
327:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
303:
297:
293:
289:
285:
283:
280:
275:
273:
268:
266:
260:
256:
250:
244:
243:
242:
241:
237:
233:
229:
224:
223:
222:
221:
213:
209:
205:
201:
200:
199:
195:
191:
187:
183:
180:
179:
172:
169:
163:
162:
161:
157:
153:
149:
148:
147:
146:
143:
140:
131:In the lead,
130:
129:
125:
124:
123:
122:
118:
114:
109:
105:
101:
93:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2297:
2294:
2277:
2250:Closing note
2249:
2215:Brianboulton
2169:Brianboulton
2160:
2159:
2141:Many thanks
2126:
2122:
2120:
2095:
2066:
2064:
1978:
1976:
1944:Gog the Mild
1942:
1937:
1935:
1846:Gog the Mild
1844:
1781:
1683:
1649:
1641:
1619:
1600:
1584:
1578:
1559:
1540:
1532:
1389:
1384:
1129:
1113:Gog the Mild
1111:
1108:
960:Gog the Mild
958:
955:
822:
715:
711:
660:
656:
614:
608:
602:
598:Daily Mirror
596:
537:
535:
469:
463:
415:
411:
310:
304:Image review
272:SerialNumber
271:
264:
258:
219:
218:
181:
97:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2278:Laser brain
1896:No problem
1436:Now done -
100:Blair Peach
54:Laser brain
1741:'sus law'.
1605:Brain 2010
1564:Rollo 1980
1545:Joyce 2010
1533:References
1479:constables
420:Nikkimaria
378:Nikkimaria
360:Nikkimaria
315:Nikkimaria
2258:WP:FAC/ar
2254:candidate
2130:Cassianto
2070:Cassianto
1982:Cassianto
1547:, p. 186.
1505:threats.
1503:terrorist
1487:uniformed
1483:inspector
1475:sergeants
1393:Tim riley
1360:Tim riley
1226:this edit
1052:Tim riley
714:catalyst
664:Tim riley
655:Happy to
618:Tim riley
610:The Times
541:Tim riley
255:Noswall59
228:Noswall59
2252:: This
2233:SchroCat
2184:SchroCat
2147:SchroCat
2083:SchroCat
2043:SchroCat
2017:SchroCat
1959:SchroCat
1919:SchroCat
1898:SchroCat
1880:SchroCat
1861:SchroCat
1818:SchroCat
1797:SchroCat
1758:SchroCat
1720:SchroCat
1695:SchroCat
1626:, p. 26.
1607:, p. 13.
1513:SchroCat
1438:SchroCat
1370:SchroCat
1331:SchroCat
1295:SchroCat
1267:SchroCat
1230:SchroCat
1194:SchroCat
1164:SchroCat
1134:SchroCat
1094:SchroCat
1056:SchroCat
1027:SchroCat
1002:SchroCat
977:SchroCat
926:SchroCat
907:SchroCat
888:SchroCat
863:SchroCat
834:SchroCat
803:SchroCat
771:SchroCat
751:SchroCat
726:SchroCat
691:SchroCat
639:SchroCat
578:SchroCat
561:SchroCat
516:SchroCat
484:SchroCat
464:Comments
462:Support
438:SchroCat
416:Guardian
412:Guardian
382:SchroCat
333:SchroCat
311:Guardian
288:SchroCat
249:watching
204:SchroCat
152:SchroCat
113:SchroCat
83:SchroCat
50:promoted
2161:Support
2123:Support
1938:support
1793:example
1782:Sources
1477:and 30
1385:Orpheus
1352:'wrote'
1044:'wrote'
952:'whom'.
818:'show'.
657:support
259:Apropos
190:Wehwalt
182:Support
2284:(talk)
1319:this.
941:'was'.
601:, but
507:view.)
58:FACBot
1642:Notes
1082:'the'
278:54129
245:Only
16:<
2237:talk
2219:talk
2188:talk
2173:talk
2151:talk
2143:Cass
2087:talk
2047:talk
2021:talk
1963:talk
1948:talk
1923:talk
1884:talk
1865:talk
1850:talk
1822:talk
1801:talk
1795:. -
1762:talk
1724:talk
1699:talk
1684:that
1630:help
1611:help
1592:help
1570:help
1551:help
1517:talk
1465:The
1442:talk
1398:talk
1374:talk
1335:talk
1299:talk
1271:talk
1234:talk
1198:talk
1190:here
1168:talk
1138:talk
1117:talk
1098:talk
1060:talk
1031:talk
1006:talk
981:talk
964:talk
930:talk
911:talk
892:talk
884:here
867:talk
838:talk
807:talk
775:talk
755:talk
730:talk
695:talk
669:talk
643:talk
623:talk
607:and
582:talk
565:talk
546:talk
520:talk
488:talk
442:talk
424:talk
386:talk
364:talk
337:talk
319:talk
292:talk
232:talk
208:talk
194:talk
184:per
156:talk
117:talk
87:talk
62:talk
56:via
2272:bot
1876:Gog
823:can
716:for
712:the
574:Tim
376:Hi
52:by
2268:}}
2262:{{
2239:)
2221:)
2190:)
2175:)
2153:)
2089:)
2049:)
2023:)
1965:)
1950:)
1940:.
1925:)
1886:)
1867:)
1852:)
1824:)
1803:)
1764:)
1726:)
1701:)
1519:)
1511:-
1444:)
1376:)
1337:)
1301:)
1273:)
1236:)
1228:-
1200:)
1192:-
1170:)
1140:)
1119:)
1100:)
1062:)
1033:)
1008:)
983:)
966:)
932:)
913:)
894:)
869:)
840:)
809:)
777:)
757:)
732:)
697:)
645:)
584:)
567:)
522:)
490:)
444:)
426:)
388:)
366:)
339:)
321:)
294:)
265:——
234:)
210:)
196:)
158:)
119:)
89:)
67:.
33:.
2235:(
2217:(
2186:(
2171:(
2149:(
2085:(
2045:(
2019:(
1961:(
1946:(
1921:(
1882:(
1863:(
1848:(
1820:(
1799:(
1760:(
1722:(
1697:(
1632:)
1613:)
1594:)
1588:.
1572:)
1553:)
1515:(
1440:(
1372:(
1333:(
1297:(
1269:(
1232:(
1196:(
1166:(
1136:(
1115:(
1096:(
1058:(
1029:(
1004:(
979:(
962:(
928:(
909:(
890:(
865:(
836:(
805:(
773:(
753:(
728:(
693:(
641:(
580:(
563:(
518:(
486:(
440:(
422:(
384:(
362:(
335:(
317:(
290:(
251:)
247:(
238:.
230:(
206:(
192:(
154:(
115:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.