300:
I have no plans to do anything to fulfill silly rules or appease people who think they can improve
Knowledge by deleting the most comprehensive freely available account of this species in existence. In any case, it already cites independent sources (none were written by the rats, as far as I'm aware)
168:
This rat has only once been collected live, but we know from subfossils that quite recently it was fairly widely distributed on
Madagascar. Its dramatic range shift may have been the result of climate change, and even its current tiny range is threatened by human activities. The article covers what
662:". This single coding method isn't accessible, and it has a notorious combination of red and green. It might help if the primary coding method used shape, e.g. squares, triangles, circles. It might also help if the relevant region was a higher proportion of the image.
644:". Image captions are useful when people that aren't accessing images. It might help to be more explicit and add something like '...in Madagascar'. This would give a better idea of the image when you haven't seen it.
117:
696:
The Mikea Forest is one of the largest remaining forests of southwestern
Madagascar, but it is not protected and is threatened by logging, pasture, and conversion to agricultural land.
40:
88:
83:
227:
The ordering of the lead seems backwards. I would think you'd want to describe the creature before detailing why it has had a shift in distribution.
92:
75:
30:
17:
754:
732:
722:
705:
687:
669:
651:
629:
605:
595:
571:
544:
501:
476:
442:
413:
386:
376:
353:
337:
305:
280:
253:
235:
205:
196:
173:
160:
665:
I'll look into it. What color combinations do you think would work best? I'll have to look into SVG syntax to create different shapes.
133:
680:". I think that 'will probably qualify' is better. Even better still, 'may qualify' has the same meaning and is more plain English.
586:
with regard to
Criterion 1a, but I would prefer "in addition to" instead of "coupled with". Thank you for an engaging contribution.
138:
625:
245:
Why is
Goodman, Vasey and Burney 2006 in the "Literature cited" section but not in the References? Can this source be used?
739:
292:
requirement for independent/secondary sources. You may want to hunt up a couple of such sources to keep this out of
79:
468:
It's pretty significantly bigger, actually (body weight is about 5 standard deviations above the average for
683:
Used "will very probably qualify". "May qualify" seems to weak; the source says it "almost certainly" will.
169:
little is known about the species and underwent a rigorous GA review by
Casliber. Thanks for your reviews!
750:
557:, where it's even more likely that a reader will know. Not enough of an issue to withhold support though,
71:
64:
323:
FWIW, it's standard practice on
Knowledge that all animal and plant species are notable by definition.
718:
591:
192:
566:
540:
I think we can assume readers of this article know what a bird of prey is. Thanks for your review!
456:
is being a bit bigger and a different tail tuft colour. Is that all? If so, why is this split from
408:
332:
619:
273:
Isn't there an image of the living specimen that could be presented? If not, how about a sketch?
698:". I think that sentence is quite a lot to take in and might be better as two or perhaps three.
743:
53:
514:— Is it actually worth red-linking? The concept is self-evident and barely merits an article.
729:
702:
684:
666:
648:
602:
554:
541:
498:
473:
439:
383:
370:
347:
302:
277:
263:
250:
232:
202:
170:
157:
714:
587:
188:
701:
I think the length of the sentence is fine; it's not even longer than the preceding one.
559:
401:
325:
615:
472:), and the tail tuft is quite distinctive (Goodman & Soarimalala, 2005: fig. 3).
293:
289:
435:
614:
was pretty good at GA review and I can't think of any other tweaks to improve it.
109:
660:
Red: find of a living animal; green: subfossil material; blue: subfossil material
366:
343:
259:
438:
article that the
English name was common enough, so I've also changed it here.
426:— why the French name instead of the English used in the site's own article ?
497:
It's placing it in the context of the small-mammal community it's part of.
601:
Thank you. I simply changed it to "and", which seems even better to me.
434:
Many
English sources use the French name. However, we decided with the
310:
Yes, I find the whole issue of "independence" to be a tad subjective.
221:—It looks pretty good to me, albeit brief. Here's a few observations:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
489:— can you clarify the significance of this with regard to the rat?
342:
That may be. I know it's true of geographical locations. Thanks.—
184:
Goodman 2010 in
References, seems to be 2008 in Literature
118:
Featured article candidates/Macrotarsomys petteri/archive1
143:
105:
101:
97:
57:
301:
and secondary ones (Garbutt, 2007 and Goodman, 2008).
249:
It is in the references (numbers 11, 14, 15, and 16).
487:
Other small mammals known from the Forêt des Mikea...
288:
Currently this article doesn't appear to satisfy the
296:. (I know, this seems daft. But it does happen. :-)
761:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
452:As far as I can see, the only differences fromm
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
767:No further edits should be made to this page.
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
460:on the basis of one specimen and some bones?
201:Goodman corrected. Thanks for the review.
122:
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
553:Well, I've just been asked to link it in
125:
115:
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
216:—My main concerns were addressed.
24:
642:Range of Macrotarsomys petteri
1:
276:None are freely available.
31:featured article nomination
784:
733:02:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
728:Thanks for your comments!
723:00:08, 27 April 2011 (UTC)
706:02:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
688:02:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
670:02:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
652:02:22, 28 April 2011 (UTC)
630:12:58, 24 April 2011 (UTC)
606:12:11, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
596:08:38, 22 April 2011 (UTC)
572:10:07, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
545:22:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
502:22:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
477:22:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
443:22:37, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
414:12:13, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
387:17:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
377:17:01, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
354:17:02, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
338:15:42, 18 April 2011 (UTC)
306:17:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
281:17:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
254:17:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
236:17:11, 17 April 2011 (UTC)
206:02:33, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
197:02:10, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
187:Images are unproblematic.
174:01:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
161:01:44, 16 April 2011 (UTC)
740:Petter's Big-footed Mouse
764:Please do not modify it.
738:There is no redirect at
658:The image caption says "
640:The image caption says "
382:Thanks for your review!
36:Please do not modify it.
755:17:16, 1 May 2011 (UTC)
647:Added "in Madagascar".
399:Just a few quibbles,
72:Macrotarsomys petteri
65:Macrotarsomys petteri
365:Thank you. Regards,
678:will likely qualify
179:Source/Image review
56:18:13, 1 May 2011
231:Lead rearranged.
164:
151:
150:
775:
766:
747:
713:Hope that helps
569:
562:
555:Fiji Parrotfinch
411:
404:
335:
328:
154:
123:
113:
95:
48:The article was
38:
783:
782:
778:
777:
776:
774:
773:
772:
771:
762:
745:
567:
560:
424:Forêt des Mikea
409:
402:
333:
326:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
781:
779:
770:
769:
736:
735:
711:
710:
709:
708:
692:
691:
690:
674:
673:
672:
656:
655:
654:
609:
608:
581:
580:
579:
578:
577:
576:
575:
574:
548:
547:
535:
534:
527:
526:
525:
524:
518:
517:
507:
506:
505:
504:
492:
491:
482:
481:
480:
479:
463:
462:
448:
447:
446:
445:
429:
428:
417:
416:
390:
389:
363:
362:
361:
360:
359:
358:
357:
356:
316:
315:
314:
313:
312:
311:
285:
284:
283:
271:
270:
269:
256:
241:
240:
239:
238:
211:
210:
209:
208:
185:
166:
165:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
780:
768:
765:
759:
758:
757:
756:
752:
748:
741:
734:
731:
727:
726:
725:
724:
720:
716:
707:
704:
700:
699:
697:
693:
689:
686:
682:
681:
679:
675:
671:
668:
664:
663:
661:
657:
653:
650:
646:
645:
643:
639:
638:
637:
636:
632:
631:
627:
624:
621:
617:
613:
607:
604:
600:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
585:
573:
570:
565:
563:
556:
552:
551:
550:
549:
546:
543:
539:
538:
537:
536:
532:
531:birds of prey
529:
528:
522:
521:
520:
519:
516:
515:
509:
508:
503:
500:
496:
495:
494:
493:
490:
488:
484:
483:
478:
475:
471:
467:
466:
465:
464:
461:
459:
455:
450:
449:
444:
441:
437:
433:
432:
431:
430:
427:
425:
421:
420:
419:
418:
415:
412:
407:
405:
398:
397:
392:
391:
388:
385:
381:
380:
379:
378:
374:
373:
368:
355:
351:
350:
345:
341:
340:
339:
336:
331:
329:
322:
321:
320:
319:
318:
317:
309:
308:
307:
304:
299:
298:
297:
295:
291:
286:
282:
279:
275:
274:
272:
267:
266:
261:
257:
255:
252:
248:
247:
246:
243:
242:
237:
234:
230:
229:
228:
225:
224:
223:
222:
220:
215:
207:
204:
200:
199:
198:
194:
190:
186:
183:
182:
181:
180:
176:
175:
172:
163:
162:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
763:
760:
737:
712:
695:
677:
659:
641:
634:
633:
622:
611:
610:
583:
582:
558:
530:
513:
512:'trap-nights
511:
486:
485:
469:
457:
453:
451:
436:Mikea Forest
423:
422:
400:
395:
393:
371:
364:
348:
324:
287:
264:
244:
226:
218:
217:
213:
212:
178:
177:
167:
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
54:SandyGeorgia
49:
47:
35:
28:
588:Graham Colm
568:talk to me?
410:talk to me?
334:talk to me?
258:Ah, sorry.—
715:Lightmouse
189:Nikkimaria
694:It says "
676:It says "
561:Jimfbleak
470:M. ingens
403:Jimfbleak
327:Jimfbleak
626:contribs
616:Casliber
523:Removed.
396:Comments
394:Support
219:Comments
134:Analysis
50:promoted
746:Georgia
635:Comment
612:Support
584:Support
533:— link?
214:Support
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
730:Ucucha
703:Ucucha
685:Ucucha
667:Ucucha
649:Ucucha
603:Ucucha
542:Ucucha
499:Ucucha
474:Ucucha
458:ingens
454:ingens
440:Ucucha
384:Ucucha
303:Ucucha
294:WP:AfD
290:WP:GNG
278:Ucucha
251:Ucucha
233:Ucucha
203:Ucucha
171:Ucucha
158:Ucucha
93:delete
744:Sandy
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
751:Talk
719:talk
620:talk
592:talk
372:talk
349:talk
265:talk
193:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
742:.
367:RJH
344:RJH
260:RJH
52:by
753:)
721:)
628:)
594:)
564:-
406:-
375:)
352:)
330:-
195:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
749:(
717:(
623:·
618:(
590:(
510:'
369:(
346:(
268:)
262:(
191:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.