129:(1935), the best-known of the five film versions, as the mutineers turn their captain and 18 others adrift in a small open boat in the south Pacific Ocean. The basic story is no doubt familiar to many of you from the movies and/or books: Captain Bligh is a tyrannical sadist in charge of a "hell ship"; Fletcher Christian proclaims "We'll be men again if we hang for it" and heroically leads the men to freedom. What resemblance has this to the historical events? Not very much. The records show that Bligh actually gave out an exceptionally low number of floggings for the time, though he was given to thunderous rages and humiliating put-downs. His harsh treatment of his former favourite Christian, whom he had made second-in-command during the outward voyage, combined with other psychological stressors to bring the younger man to a state of brooding, suicidal desperation that boiled over into mutiny on the morning of 28 April 1789. The rest, as they say, is history.
202:– Another peer reviewer checking in. I was impressed then and am impressed again at a second reading. A fine piece of work that meets all the FA criteria for the text. I am glad to learn the facts of the case after a lifetime vaguely believing the myths. I don't usually comment on images, Knowledge's arcane rules being beyond me, but I thought this article particularly well illustrated. –
2124:
articles with which I have not had any involvement, so I would be glad for help if I am not performing the review as required. I have done a spot check of five citations that reference sources that are available online, as I do not have access to the offline sources. Of these five citations, four matched up perfectly and one only partially. Citation 29 sources the following statements:
639:, but I have to say your phrasing above is crude to say the least, and your description of Brian and me as "instant Google experts" with no actual knowledge of the mutiny is frankly very offensive. If the article is as terrible as you seem to think it is I am mystified as to why it has garnered so much support from staid FAC regulars above. My co-nominator Brian has authored the
856:: "Strains were showing within the party; following a heated disagreement with Purcell, Bligh grabbed a cutlass and challenged the carpenter to fight. Fryer told Cole to arrest their captain, but backed down after Bligh threatened to kill him if he interfered." What happened next ? Has there been a duel between Bligh and Purcell or did the captain regained his composure ?
696:
approach reviewing, and unproductive ways. To avoid landing one in Column B, it's best have evidence something is wrong, rather than just words. I'm not sure whether the claim that the
Tahitian liaisons were all female is based on actual evidence, assumption, or something else. More to the point, no one does. Please don't bring words to an evidence fight.--
1362:, some discussion has been held on the subject. Cliftonian has argued that there is a need for demystifying clarification on the affiliation of the crew. My point is that it is not normal account for the non-notable elements of a set in a navbox in this way. I don't know how many template people will be viewing this, but maybe
2158:
source review usually includes a look at the formatting and consistency of the footnotes, bibliography, etc—do you think you could find a minute or two to have a look at that too? I'm fairly sure it's all okay but another set of eyes couldn't hurt. I'm glad you like the article. Cheers and I hope you're well. —
453:
I thought the word "consorts" was well-chosen. They were, after all, the lords of
Pitcairn. And given the isolation and bleakness that they chose, the word "consorts" works in an ironic sense too. As for the Tahitians, I have never seen anything that suggested that the liaisons were all female. I
1560:
sounds like throwing the baby out with the bathwater and illustrates the previous point - just because it is the only article doesn't mean it's the only book (authors shouldn't be linked though, as they are only tangentially related to the topic of the navbox). With the books and films presented in
1406:
The unlinked added notes are for the benefit of readers who, unaware of WP template protocols, may wonder why, if there were 22 "loyalists" and 21 "mutineers", only 5 and 9 names respectively are shown. An alternative presentation might be to remove the unlinked notes and precede the lists of names
547:
signed up under naval regulations which bound them in obedience to their captain. "Loyalist" is the description used throughout the sources to describe those who followed Bligh in accordance with their duty under these regulations. Those that chose to follow
Christian were legally mutineers. There
535:
4. The word "loyalists" appears five times in the article. I really think this is the wrong word. I know what you're trying to say, but the word has unintended connotations. Some readers may feel that the "loyalists" were somehow morally superior to those who weren't "loyal". This kind of black and
434:
You cannot say the Oxford
Dictionary definition is "wrong" or that accepting it is silly. You can suggest alternative words which you think are better. The two you have suggested have a rather contemporary feel, and I'm not convinced that either is an improvement. If other reviewers wish to support
1579:
matter what impression we give with the navbox, which is an inherent part of the article page and will be seen by many readers who are not au fait with what navboxes are supposed to do or not do. These readers, as
Cliftonian argues, will be misled unless we give them a slight helping hand, and for
1511:
book on the Mutiny, which it obviously isn't (I added a couple more with links to the authors, but TonyTheTiger protested so I removed the whole section). I'm not sure why you think it is better to remove context by taking all the years out—the titles are all so similar it really helps to have the
2157:
I've put an inline reference to McKinney in after "having yielded the great cabin" and expanded the Dening ref at the end here. I think it's evident from the wording and the diagrams on the pages immediately following how small these cabins were. Thank you for this David, this has been helpful. A
2141:
The portions of this passage that are in bold are the portions that I did not find on the page indicated in the citation. I do not doubt that the information is accurate or that it is provided in somewhere in the sources used in this article. For example, the fact that Bligh had yielded the great
695:
saga. I've read a fair amount of the nonfiction as well as the classic trilogy. I don't come to the subject cold. I saw nothing unexpected or apparently wrong. This article represents hard work, uncompensated but for the satisfaction. Over the years, I've learned there are productive ways to
566:
I accept your arguments, but disagree with your terminology. In my opinion, the word "loyalist" has connotations which are inapplicable to this context. I suspect that many of those who joined Bligh did so out of fear of the consequences rather than any particular loyalty to crown and country; I
2123:
This is an impressive and extensive article written by two well-established editors. There has been plenty of support for its promotion to featured status already, so I thought my time might best be spent by performing a source review. I do not have much experience performing source reviews for
582:
I see that Mr Brian
Boulton discusses Captain Bligh's "social intercourse". At this point it's time to call it a day. The article is very obviously the work of an "instant Google expert" rather than someone who's lived with the subject matter for an extended period and has a proper, academic
505:
Oh God! Did you notice I didn't use the term "fuck buddy"? What is a "legal spouse"? Do you believe a non-legal spouse is somehow inferior to a legal spouse and thus warrants quotation marks? Try to drop your
Anglocentric view of what is right and what is wrong. Try to to understand that many
478:
3. RE: "Mutineers divided" and the phrase 'Others, such as
Stewart and Heywood, settled into quiet domesticity with their "wives"'. Why put quotation marks around the word "wives"? I really don't get all this old-fashioned prudishness. A bunch of English sailors met some girls, fucked them,
1594:
If you're adamant, as a compromise I'd suggest removing the numbers and adding a simple "among others" at the end. We don't need to quantify, that's what articles are for. Note that in bibliographies, discographies and the like we'd include the notable books and records (per
567:
suspect too that those who sided with
Christian were motivated by their hatred of Bligh rather than anti-British sentiments. I also suspect that pussy may have been a motivating factor, but I shan't pursue this point as I don't wish to offend your Victorian sensibilities.
1561:
chronological order, in my opinion there is no need for the years - this is actually the subject of an ongoing debate elsewhere though, but it's the navigation vs information point, and quite frankly it looks a lot more pleasing without the plain text years present. --
1767:
2078:
I wasn't terribly surprised by the deletion, alas. I didn't take one that makes it relatively insignificant, and if copyright laws for Tahiti are those of France, well, it wouldn't make it. Possibly I'll get there again someday. Or a better photographer than me
536:
white portrayal of events is unacceptable in a Wiki article and raises question re: neutrality. Let's put things another way: what would readers think if we described those loyal to
Captain Bligh as scum and the mutineers as Fletcher Christian's loyalists?
426:
No, this is a silly argument. You know perfectly well that lots of words have multiple meanings, some of which are archaic or applicable to certain contexts only. Drop the word "consort" and use either "partner" or "girlfriend". The current wording is
486:
This seems a somewhat contrived effort to get a four-letter word into your argument, such as it is. The quote marks around "wives" merely indicate that they were not necessarily the legal spouses of the sailors with whom they cohabited.
360:
1. RE: "many of the men lived ashore and formed sexual attachments with native Polynesians". This is twee and wrong. Sex was heterosexual. The sailors screwed the local girls and had girlfriends. The phrase "sexual attachments" is
2132:
occupied private sleeping quarters with an adjacent dining area or pantry on the starboard side of the ship, and Fryer a small cabin on the opposite side. Huggan the surgeon, the other warrant officers and Nelson the botanist had
1453:
2142:
cabin appears to be sourced earlier in the article to the McKinney book; perhaps that citation could be added here as well. I hope this spot check his helpful; I would be glad to see this article up on the main page.
863:
Keep in mind they were all so weak each of them could barely lift a sword. Purcell showed no inclination of wanting to fight, Bligh shouted a bit more and eventually he threw his cutlass down and the crisis was over.
990:: "When Edwards gave the order to abandon ship, the armourer began to remove the prisoners' shackles, but the ship sank before he had finished." Is the armourer Joseph Coleman ? If so, why was he not also shackled ?
144:
over the past week from an all-star selection of FAC regulars and received very positive feedback. We hope you enjoy the article and look forward to hearing any thoughts you may have. All comments are welcome.
1906:
law like in Tahiti? When was this monument established? If French Polynesia is under French copyright law, then there is no freedom of panorama, and this is likely a derivative work of a non-free subject.
1407:
with the word "including". I would have no problem with that. The important factor is that the navbox shouldn't mislead or raise questions in readers' minds, which simple removal of the notes might do.
1999:
1935:
Are there any monuments in the UK? There's freedom of panorama there for both buildings and statues (and I'd expect the monuments to be quite a bit older, and thus possibly out of copyright anyways). —
1112:, thanks for this. I'm glad you like the article. First of all, please excuse my presumptuousness for moving your comments up, but I thought it better not to have them under the "source review" header.
963:
in a storm, and believed lost. Amazingly, the crew managed to sail it to Batavia, where Captain Edwards presented it to the Governor of Timor as a keepsake. This little story isn't really part of the
2180:
Thanks for addressing that concern. The footnotes and bibliography all seem to be formatted consistently and correctly. Thanks for inviting me to participate in this FAC! I hope you are well also.
640:
667:—who have authored at least 10 FAs each. I am bemused and disappointed by your decision to conduct yourself in this manner and hope for your sake that this is the exception rather than the norm. —
1552:
Thanks for responding, and good work on the article! It doesn't matter what impression we give with a navbox - the numbers of crew (and their loyalties, fates, etc, etc) can all be found at the
1425:
The numbers should be removed altogether, so readers wouldn't then be counting. Also, the years of the novels and films should be removed, except for disambiguation. I'd also like to see the
719:
1273:
occurred in the south Pacific, on 28 April 1789". I would not wish to change the article's title, as the event described in the article is universally known as the "Mutiny on the Bounty".
2046:
Reluctantly, I have withdrawn the image of the memorial stone. If it is later shown to be PD within the scope of these tortuous panorama regulations, then we can always reinstate it.
1599:) without this annotation, without worrying whether the reader would think that was all the books and records made by the author/artist, so I still maintain this is unnecessary. --
1236:
Cliftonian is correct in his reasoning, but looking at the current first sentence I find myself agreeing that the wording is not altogether satisfactory. Currently it reads: "The
1773:
586:
And now -- if you'll excuse me -- I shall take my leave and drive my consort to a local restaurant. I look forward to a well-cooked steak and some engaging social intercourse.
141:
1531:
621:
Thank you, Brian. Unfortunately steak was off the menu so my consort and I ordered fish instead. Social intercourse was fine, however. Good luck with your nomination!
1138:. If the articles were the same then the other would have to be worded "The sinking of the Titanic occurred to the RMS Titanic". Does that help show the difference?
2005:
1645:
Thank you, Rob, for this compromise. I would prefer to see "and 17 others" and "and 12 others" stay instead of "among others", but I will accept this version. —
166:
I could find very little wrong with it at the peer review to the point that I felt useless reviewing it! An excellent account which clearly meets FA criteria.♦
1198:
Regarding your second point: "RMS" requires "the" before it while "HMS" does not. This is because "RMS" stands for "Royal Mail Ship"—"the Royal Mail Ship
40:
2028:
stone at Tahiti, which presumably comes under French law regarding freedom of panorama, unfortunately. Is there anything that can be done, you think? —
479:
established pair bonds, settled down and started families. Words and phrases such as "sexual attachments" and "consorts" seem horribly inappropriate.
959:, which used it as a tender. During Edwards's search for mutineers in the vicinity of Samoa, the schooner and its scratch crew was separated from
1958:- Needs a US PD tag (PD-100 works, though you need to fix the link to the artist, and I'd provide his YOD on the information template as well).
1755:
1258:, we don't have to work the article title into the first line when the title describes an event, and I think a smoother version might be: "The
2218:
1302:
occurred in the south Pacific on 28 April 1789."? I've gone ahead and made this change provisionally to make it easier to gauge in context. —
30:
17:
793:
395:
2 RE: "descendants of the mutineers and their Tahitian consorts would live on Pitcairn into the 21st century". The word "consorts" is wrong.
2229:
2252:
2203:
2189:
2171:
2151:
2106:
2088:
2069:
2055:
2041:
2017:
1978:
1944:
1926:
1890:
1852:
1830:
1802:
1746:
1711:
1696:
1658:
1640:
1626:
1608:
1589:
1570:
1547:
1490:
1466:
1442:
1416:
1397:
1329:
1315:
1282:
1231:
1189:
1147:
1102:
1049:
1030:
1014:
976:
946:
910:
877:
838:
820:
801:
779:
760:
736:
705:
680:
630:
612:
595:
557:
522:
496:
463:
444:
416:
377:
353:
337:
318:
291:
277:
258:
236:
217:
193:
174:
158:
101:
1761:
1380:
368:
How do you know that all the sex was heterosexual? There's nothing silly about the phrase, although "relationships" may be better.
1899:
1702:
I have reverted him. He does not have the authority to override discussions in this way just because he disagrees with the outcome.
1358:
there seems to be some unusual presentation of unlinked encyclopedic content in the form of "and 17 others" and "and 12 others". At
249:
saga, having read several of the books on it, though not recently, and having been to several of the relevant sites. Well done.--
402:
No it isn't. The word is defined in the Oxford dictionary as "a wife, husband or companion" which seems to fit the bill exactly.
282:
I echo my colleague's thanks to the above, and my appreciation for the parts they played in raising the quality of the article.
1683:
has just removed the "among others" text again on the grounds that the crewmen without articles are supposedly "not notable". —
386:
Yes, the word "relationships" works. You could also talk about "bonds". And trust me, the phrase "sexual attachments" is twee.
1556:
article. The navbox only exists for navigation between existing articles, not encyclopedic information. The removal of the
1143:
1098:
1062:
The opening sentence of the lede ought to be worded differently, as it's tautologous currently. Perhaps: "On 28 April 1789 a
2194:
I add my thanks to Cliftonian's for your sources review. Please feel welcome to participate in any future FAC nomination.
1779:
1355:
506:
marriages around the globe are sanctioned by religious authorities and cultural norms rather than faceless legal entities.
1553:
1811:
1987:
1839:
was broken, but the actual source information was okay. I've fixed the broken links anyway—thanks for this David. —
1723:
1120:
1075:
922:: "One group, led by Morrison and Tom McIntosh, began building a schooner" Did they succeeded in their enterprise ?
890:: In the first, Thomas Hall and Robert Lamb died in Batavia whereas they returned safely in England in the second.
1139:
1109:
1094:
751:, all per the MoS. An excellent and extremely well-put together article that I have no hesitation supporting. -
2002:- Not sure the date is correct, but that seems to be the standard for this uploader. No problem copyright wise.
887:
302:– This is certainly one of the best articles I have read over the last few years. In fact, I liked it so much,
1457:
seems to have been inexplicably removed at some point. The removal of the animations seems valid though. --
603:
I am sure that the FAC co-ordinators will give due weight to your insightful observations. Enjoy your steak.
1123:", seems to me to follow this guideline and to closely mirror the opening sentence we already have for this
2024:
Great. Thank you for all of this Chris, you've been very helpful. It seems the only issue is regarding the
1119:, the subject of the opening sentence should be the title if this is possible. The article you linked to, "
2199:
2165:
2100:
2051:
2035:
1972:
1920:
1884:
1846:
1796:
1740:
1707:
1690:
1652:
1636:
1631:
Thank you. I will go along with this version, and if Cliftonian is likewise happy we'll leave it at that.
1585:
1541:
1429:
link removed from the left side (maybe to the title), giving that over to just the "Complement..." link.
1412:
1376:
1359:
1325:
1309:
1278:
1225:
1183:
1043:
1026:
1008:
972:
940:
904:
871:
834:
814:
773:
674:
608:
553:
518:
492:
440:
412:
373:
331:
287:
271:
230:
187:
152:
95:
1214:
for article titles, which, because of the popular novel and film accounts, is undoubtedly "Mutiny on the
2247:
2065:
2013:
1940:
789:
643:
of any Wikipedian; the FA reviewers here supporting the article's promotion are the all-time FA leader,
1523:
1473:
2160:
2095:
2030:
1967:
1955:
1915:
1879:
1841:
1791:
1735:
1685:
1647:
1536:
1347:
1304:
1220:
1211:
1178:
1038:
1003:
935:
899:
866:
809:
768:
669:
326:
266:
225:
182:
147:
90:
72:
2130:
Living space on the ship was allocated on the basis of rank. Bligh, having yielded the great cabin,
1993:
1903:
1622:
1617:. I've left the years in, although I'm personally against them, but I think it's a bit tidier. --
1604:
1566:
1486:
1462:
1438:
729:
314:
210:
1596:
756:
110:
513:
I will delete the words "with their wives", which seem to be causing you such pain and anguish.
2060:
Unless the sculptor's been dead for 70 years, there probably isn't. K, images look good now. —
2195:
2084:
2047:
1703:
1680:
1632:
1581:
1408:
1388:
1371:
1351:
1321:
1274:
1022:
968:
830:
701:
626:
604:
591:
549:
514:
488:
459:
436:
408:
369:
349:
283:
254:
137:
85:
2240:
2222:
2185:
2147:
2061:
2009:
1936:
1826:
1392:
967:
mutiny, but since it has been raised here, I will fashion a footnote with the bare details.
656:
167:
122:
61:
53:
1863:
1768:
File:William Hodges - Tahitian War Galleys in Matavai Bay, Tahiti - Google Art Project.jpg
1116:
2221:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
1866:- Fine, though apparently the "Conditions of Use of Astronaut Photographs" link is dead.
1618:
1600:
1562:
1527:
1482:
1458:
1434:
1384:
1363:
1255:
797:
724:
652:
648:
309:
205:
1367:
752:
664:
118:
2080:
715:
697:
644:
636:
622:
587:
455:
345:
250:
1499:
one gets the hugely misleading impression that there were less than 20 men aboard
583:
understanding of the cultural and historical nuances; the prose is just stupid.
109:"I'll take my chance against the law. You'll take yours against the sea." So says
2236:
2181:
2143:
1822:
114:
57:
1575:
Sorry to disagree, and I realise you are trying to be helpful, but I think it
1451:, the crew count and the years of the novels are recent additions anyway. And
1354:
seem to have done a highly respected job of presenting this topic. However, at
1513:
1478:
1426:
1296:
1292:
1267:
1263:
1248:
1244:
1074:
occurred on 28 April 1789"? This is the wording of, for instance, the article
1156:
Someone reading about the subject for the first time might not know that the
1081:
Is there a particular reason why the article is not named "Mutiny on the HMS
1913:
Hmmm. This seems to be correct. We may have to lose this one in that case. —
1770:- With PD-100 we don't need a separate template for the US. I've removed it.
660:
1580:
this purpose I think it's perfectly acceptable to bend the rules slightly.
718:
has a history of, to put it kindly, inexplicable interventions at FAC: see
1495:
You see, this is what Brian and I mean. Looking at your proposed version
245:
could find little to criticise at the PR. I have some knowledge of the
264:
Thank you very much Gary for your help at PR and the kind words here. —
1558:
The Eventful History of the Mutiny and Piratical Seizure of HMS Bounty
1505:
The Eventful History of the Mutiny and Piratical Seizure of HMS Bounty
1454:
The Eventful History of the Mutiny and Piratical Seizure of HMS Bounty
1063:
829:
My thanks added to SchroCat and Dan for their support, most welcome.
1782:- Needs a template that applies to the US. PD-100 will do the trick.
180:
Thank you Doctor for your help at PR and for your very kind words. —
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
1733:
OK, removed the second one (dead link anyway so far as I can see) —
691:
A brief comment, if I may. I won't pretend to be an expert on the
792:. I've looked at the changes made since I copyedited this for PR.
548:
is no question of any breach of neutrality in these descriptions.
1127:
article. So I'm afraid I don't quite understand your point here.
2008:- Fine. I dare say the uploader is a handsome rascal as well. —
1836:
324:
Thank you very much for the help and the kind words Cassianto. —
223:
Thank you for all your help and the extremely kind words, Tim. —
2000:
File:BOUNTY RUDDER FROM THE FIJI MUSEUM. SUVA, FIJI ISLANDS.jpg
1874:
1507:
was removed because having it there seemed to imply it was the
1176:" so there isn't the same necessity in my opinion to clarify. —
1172:
article says from the off that this is the "sinking of the RMS
766:
Thank you very much for the tweaks and the support, SchroCat. —
454:
think caution is the best path, given one thing and another.--
140:
and myself over the past couple of months. It has undergone a
1726:- Only one link should be in the "source/photographer" field.
578:. I've just looked through the article again. In the section
1202:"—while "HMS" stands for "His/Her Majesty's Ship". "The HMS
1996:- Looks like it could feasibly be the uploader's own work.
1115:
Regarding the first point about the opening sentence: per
807:
Thanks for this help and support, Dan. Hope you're well. —
720:
Knowledge:Featured article candidates/The Playboy/archive1
1130:
Currently the first sentence says that the mutiny on the
955:
Actually, they did complete it. It was requisitioned by
929:
Not really, or they wouldn't have still been there when
1776:- Fine, though personally I'd have used PD-100 instead.
1614:
1496:
1448:
1430:
748:
303:
65:
1320:
That looks OK to me (Naval → Navy no real difference)
635:
You are entitled to your opinion and I respect that,
435:
your choices, I will of course accept the consensus.
136:
has been a collaborative effort between the esteemed
1774:
File:John Webber - Poedooa, the Daughter of Oree.jpg
1835:The links to the "Online Map Creation" software at
886:There is a contradiction between this article and
2260:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
1522:worth mentioning, so I have added it—good catch.
1218:". Thanks and I hope this is all okay. Cheers, —
1160:in the title is a Royal Navy warship called HMS
1070:", or "A mutiny aboard the Royal Navy ship HMS
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
1613:Okay, I've made some changes, so now it is at
2266:No further edits should be made to this page.
2235:template in place on the talk page until the
2006:File:Poster - Mutiny on the Bounty (1935).jpg
1254:in the south Pacific, on 28 April 1789". Per
1085:?" (again thinking of the example of the RMS
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
1821:The source links for this image are broken.
1360:User_talk:TonyTheTiger#Bounty_navigation_box
132:This account of the real life Mutiny on the
1530:and as such I've nominated it for deletion
1093:Excellent article, great work both of you.
41:Knowledge talk:Featured article candidates
1066:occurred aboard the Royal Navy ship HMS
1756:File:HMS BOUNTY II with Full Sails.jpg
1503:and that most of them were mutineers.
1210:" is wrong. In any case, we go by the
18:Knowledge:Featured article candidates
7:
849:Impressive work but a few remarks :
1764:- Fine as is, but PD-100 also works
1762:File:Portrait of William Bligh.jpg
24:
1900:File:Bounty stone Venus Beach.jpg
1164:(indeed they might not even know
747:. A few minor tweaks undertaken
1877:; have rectified, good catch —
1:
1837:http://www.aquarius.geomar.de
1780:File:Mutiny on the Bounty.jpg
1356:Template:Mutiny on the Bounty
1206:" or "the His Majesty's Ship
1554:Complement of the HMS Bounty
1512:years given for everything.
1036:Thanks for this, Corbiers. —
2230:featured article candidates
1812:File:Bounty Voyages Map.png
1433:would be my suggestion. --
997:No, it was the armourer of
641:third-highest number of FAs
31:featured article nomination
2283:
1988:File:Admiral Hood 1783.jpg
1873:Link was apparently moved
1724:File:Mutiny HMS Bounty.jpg
1121:Sinking of the RMS Titanic
1076:Sinking of the RMS Titanic
2253:14:43, 21 June 2015 (UTC)
2137:cabins on the lower deck"
1330:08:42, 18 June 2015 (UTC)
1316:22:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1283:22:41, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1232:16:03, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1190:20:49, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1148:20:26, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1103:15:24, 17 June 2015 (UTC)
1050:18:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
1031:15:35, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
1015:18:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
1001:. Coleman was shackled. —
977:23:22, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
947:18:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
911:18:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
878:18:11, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
2263:Please do not modify it.
2204:16:41, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
2190:16:00, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
2172:03:35, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
2152:02:36, 6 June 2015 (UTC)
2119:Source review spot check
2107:16:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2089:17:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
2070:16:37, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2056:16:28, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2042:15:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
2018:14:53, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1979:15:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1945:16:00, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1927:15:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1891:15:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1853:01:52, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
1831:01:43, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
1803:15:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1747:15:03, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1712:19:22, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1697:19:15, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1659:16:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1641:16:23, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1627:15:54, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1609:15:42, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1590:15:35, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1571:14:48, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1548:14:39, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1491:11:41, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1481:be worth adding too? --
1467:09:30, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1443:09:25, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1417:09:14, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
1398:05:31, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
897:Ah! Good catch. Fixed. —
888:Complement of HMS Bounty
854:Bligh's open-boat voyage
839:09:01, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
821:01:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
802:01:18, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
780:01:53, 3 June 2015 (UTC)
761:22:07, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
737:18:55, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
706:17:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
681:18:20, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
631:19:41, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
613:16:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
596:09:44, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
558:16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
523:16:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
497:16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
464:17:33, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
445:16:34, 4 June 2015 (UTC)
417:16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
378:16:20, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
354:15:44, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
338:20:17, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
319:19:07, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
292:15:48, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
278:15:36, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
259:13:22, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
237:09:39, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
218:08:29, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
194:06:47, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
175:06:33, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
159:01:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
102:01:51, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
36:Please do not modify it.
1758:- Fine. Beautiful shot.
1287:Hmmmm. How about "The
796:are my edits. - Dank (
344:Comments from Singora
64:) 14:43, 21 June 2015
2093:Thanks again Chris. —
1956:File:HMS Pandora.jpg
1370:could take a look.--
1243:occurred aboard the
1140:MasterOfHisOwnDomain
1134:occurred aboard the
1110:MasterOfHisOwnDomain
1095:MasterOfHisOwnDomain
304:I supported it twice
127:Mutiny on the Bounty
1994:File:Bounty bay.jpg
1904:freedom of panorama
790:standard disclaimer
647:, and five others—
111:Fletcher Christian
1681:User:TonyTheTiger
1396:
1168:was a ship). The
920:Mutineers divided
105:
2274:
2265:
2250:
2245:
2239:goes through. --
2234:
2228:
2225:, and leave the
2170:
2168:
2163:
2105:
2103:
2098:
2040:
2038:
2033:
1977:
1975:
1970:
1925:
1923:
1918:
1889:
1887:
1882:
1851:
1849:
1844:
1801:
1799:
1794:
1745:
1743:
1738:
1695:
1693:
1688:
1657:
1655:
1650:
1546:
1544:
1539:
1526:appears to be a
1524:Quaff distillery
1474:Quaff distillery
1374:
1314:
1312:
1307:
1230:
1228:
1223:
1188:
1186:
1181:
1048:
1046:
1041:
1013:
1011:
1006:
945:
943:
938:
909:
907:
902:
876:
874:
869:
819:
817:
812:
778:
776:
771:
734:
732:
727:
714:to mention that
679:
677:
672:
336:
334:
329:
316:
312:
276:
274:
269:
235:
233:
228:
215:
213:
208:
192:
190:
185:
172:
157:
155:
150:
123:Charles Laughton
117:) to Lieutenant
100:
98:
93:
82:
48:The article was
38:
2282:
2281:
2277:
2276:
2275:
2273:
2272:
2271:
2270:
2261:
2248:
2241:
2232:
2226:
2166:
2161:
2159:
2121:
2101:
2096:
2094:
2036:
2031:
2029:
1973:
1968:
1966:
1921:
1916:
1914:
1885:
1880:
1878:
1864:File:Tubuai.jpg
1847:
1842:
1840:
1797:
1792:
1790:
1741:
1736:
1734:
1720:
1691:
1686:
1684:
1653:
1648:
1646:
1542:
1537:
1535:
1344:
1310:
1305:
1303:
1226:
1221:
1219:
1184:
1179:
1177:
1044:
1039:
1037:
1009:
1004:
1002:
941:
936:
934:
905:
900:
898:
872:
867:
865:
815:
810:
808:
774:
769:
767:
730:
725:
723:
675:
670:
668:
332:
327:
325:
310:
308:
272:
267:
265:
231:
226:
224:
211:
206:
204:
188:
183:
181:
168:
153:
148:
146:
96:
91:
89:
79:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
2280:
2278:
2269:
2268:
2256:
2255:
2211:
2210:
2209:
2208:
2207:
2206:
2175:
2174:
2139:
2138:
2120:
2117:
2116:
2115:
2114:
2113:
2112:
2111:
2110:
2109:
2091:
2073:
2072:
2062:Chris Woodrich
2021:
2020:
2010:Chris Woodrich
2003:
1997:
1991:
1984:
1983:
1982:
1981:
1960:
1959:
1952:
1951:
1950:
1949:
1948:
1947:
1937:Chris Woodrich
1930:
1929:
1908:
1907:
1896:
1895:
1894:
1893:
1868:
1867:
1860:
1859:
1858:
1857:
1856:
1855:
1816:
1815:
1808:
1807:
1806:
1805:
1784:
1783:
1777:
1771:
1765:
1759:
1752:
1751:
1750:
1749:
1728:
1727:
1719:
1716:
1715:
1714:
1678:
1677:
1676:
1675:
1674:
1673:
1672:
1671:
1670:
1669:
1668:
1667:
1666:
1665:
1664:
1663:
1662:
1661:
1611:
1469:
1445:
1420:
1419:
1401:
1400:
1343:
1342:Navigation box
1340:
1339:
1338:
1337:
1336:
1335:
1334:
1333:
1332:
1238:Mutiny on the
1196:
1195:
1194:
1193:
1192:
1151:
1150:
1113:
1091:
1090:
1079:
1053:
1052:
1020:
1019:
1018:
1017:
992:
991:
984:
983:
982:
981:
980:
979:
950:
949:
924:
923:
916:
915:
914:
913:
892:
891:
883:
882:
881:
880:
858:
857:
844:
843:
842:
841:
824:
823:
783:
782:
742:
741:
740:
739:
688:
687:
686:
685:
684:
683:
633:
616:
615:
573:
572:
571:
570:
569:
568:
561:
560:
538:
537:
532:
531:
530:
529:
528:
527:
526:
525:
508:
507:
500:
499:
481:
480:
475:
474:
473:
472:
471:
470:
469:
468:
467:
466:
448:
447:
429:
428:
406:
405:
404:
403:
397:
396:
392:
391:
390:
389:
388:
387:
381:
380:
363:
362:
341:
340:
297:
296:
295:
294:
240:
239:
197:
196:
107:
106:
84:Nominator(s):
78:
73:Mutiny on the
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
2279:
2267:
2264:
2258:
2257:
2254:
2251:
2246:
2244:
2238:
2231:
2224:
2220:
2216:
2213:
2212:
2205:
2201:
2197:
2193:
2192:
2191:
2187:
2183:
2179:
2178:
2177:
2176:
2173:
2169:
2164:
2156:
2155:
2154:
2153:
2149:
2145:
2136:
2131:
2127:
2126:
2125:
2118:
2108:
2104:
2099:
2092:
2090:
2086:
2082:
2077:
2076:
2075:
2074:
2071:
2067:
2063:
2059:
2058:
2057:
2053:
2049:
2045:
2044:
2043:
2039:
2034:
2027:
2023:
2022:
2019:
2015:
2011:
2007:
2004:
2001:
1998:
1995:
1992:
1989:
1986:
1985:
1980:
1976:
1971:
1964:
1963:
1962:
1961:
1957:
1954:
1953:
1946:
1942:
1938:
1934:
1933:
1932:
1931:
1928:
1924:
1919:
1912:
1911:
1910:
1909:
1905:
1902:- What's the
1901:
1898:
1897:
1892:
1888:
1883:
1876:
1872:
1871:
1870:
1869:
1865:
1862:
1861:
1854:
1850:
1845:
1838:
1834:
1833:
1832:
1828:
1824:
1820:
1819:
1818:
1817:
1813:
1810:
1809:
1804:
1800:
1795:
1788:
1787:
1786:
1785:
1781:
1778:
1775:
1772:
1769:
1766:
1763:
1760:
1757:
1754:
1753:
1748:
1744:
1739:
1732:
1731:
1730:
1729:
1725:
1722:
1721:
1717:
1713:
1709:
1705:
1701:
1700:
1699:
1698:
1694:
1689:
1682:
1660:
1656:
1651:
1644:
1643:
1642:
1638:
1634:
1630:
1629:
1628:
1624:
1620:
1616:
1612:
1610:
1606:
1602:
1598:
1593:
1592:
1591:
1587:
1583:
1578:
1574:
1573:
1572:
1568:
1564:
1559:
1555:
1551:
1550:
1549:
1545:
1540:
1533:
1529:
1525:
1521:
1518:
1516:
1510:
1506:
1502:
1498:
1494:
1493:
1492:
1488:
1484:
1480:
1477:
1475:
1470:
1468:
1464:
1460:
1456:
1455:
1450:
1446:
1444:
1440:
1436:
1432:
1428:
1424:
1423:
1422:
1421:
1418:
1414:
1410:
1405:
1404:
1403:
1402:
1399:
1394:
1390:
1386:
1382:
1378:
1373:
1369:
1365:
1361:
1357:
1353:
1349:
1346:
1345:
1341:
1331:
1327:
1323:
1319:
1318:
1317:
1313:
1308:
1301:
1300:
1294:
1290:
1286:
1285:
1284:
1280:
1276:
1272:
1271:
1265:
1261:
1257:
1253:
1252:
1246:
1242:
1241:
1235:
1234:
1233:
1229:
1224:
1217:
1213:
1212:WP:COMMONNAME
1209:
1205:
1201:
1197:
1191:
1187:
1182:
1175:
1171:
1167:
1163:
1159:
1155:
1154:
1153:
1152:
1149:
1145:
1141:
1137:
1133:
1129:
1128:
1126:
1122:
1118:
1114:
1111:
1107:
1106:
1105:
1104:
1100:
1096:
1088:
1084:
1080:
1077:
1073:
1069:
1065:
1061:
1060:
1059:
1057:
1051:
1047:
1042:
1035:
1034:
1033:
1032:
1028:
1024:
1016:
1012:
1007:
1000:
996:
995:
994:
993:
989:
986:
985:
978:
974:
970:
966:
962:
958:
954:
953:
952:
951:
948:
944:
939:
932:
928:
927:
926:
925:
921:
918:
917:
912:
908:
903:
896:
895:
894:
893:
889:
885:
884:
879:
875:
870:
862:
861:
860:
859:
855:
852:
851:
850:
848:
840:
836:
832:
828:
827:
826:
825:
822:
818:
813:
806:
805:
804:
803:
799:
795:
791:
788:on prose per
787:
781:
777:
772:
765:
764:
763:
762:
758:
754:
750:
746:
738:
735:
733:
728:
721:
717:
713:
709:
708:
707:
703:
699:
694:
690:
689:
682:
678:
673:
666:
662:
658:
654:
650:
646:
642:
638:
634:
632:
628:
624:
620:
619:
618:
617:
614:
610:
606:
602:
601:
600:
599:
598:
597:
593:
589:
584:
581:
577:
565:
564:
563:
562:
559:
555:
551:
546:
543:All on board
542:
541:
540:
539:
534:
533:
524:
520:
516:
512:
511:
510:
509:
504:
503:
502:
501:
498:
494:
490:
485:
484:
483:
482:
477:
476:
465:
461:
457:
452:
451:
450:
449:
446:
442:
438:
433:
432:
431:
430:
425:
424:
423:
422:
421:
420:
419:
418:
414:
410:
401:
400:
399:
398:
394:
393:
385:
384:
383:
382:
379:
375:
371:
367:
366:
365:
364:
359:
358:
357:
356:
355:
351:
347:
339:
335:
330:
323:
322:
321:
320:
317:
315:
313:
305:
301:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
279:
275:
270:
263:
262:
261:
260:
256:
252:
248:
244:
238:
234:
229:
222:
221:
220:
219:
216:
214:
209:
201:
195:
191:
186:
179:
178:
177:
176:
173:
171:
165:
161:
160:
156:
151:
143:
139:
135:
130:
128:
124:
120:
119:William Bligh
116:
112:
104:
103:
99:
94:
87:
81:
80:
77:
76:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
2262:
2259:
2242:
2215:Closing note
2214:
2196:Brianboulton
2140:
2134:
2129:
2122:
2048:Brianboulton
2025:
1718:Image review
1704:Brianboulton
1679:
1633:Brianboulton
1615:THIS version
1582:Brianboulton
1576:
1557:
1519:
1514:
1508:
1504:
1500:
1472:
1452:
1449:this version
1409:Brianboulton
1372:TonyTheTiger
1352:Brianboulton
1322:Brianboulton
1298:
1288:
1275:Brianboulton
1269:
1259:
1250:
1239:
1237:
1215:
1207:
1203:
1199:
1173:
1169:
1165:
1161:
1157:
1135:
1131:
1124:
1092:
1086:
1082:
1071:
1067:
1055:
1054:
1023:Les3corbiers
1021:
998:
987:
969:Brianboulton
964:
960:
956:
930:
919:
853:
846:
845:
831:Brianboulton
798:push to talk
785:
784:
744:
743:
722:
716:User:Singora
711:
692:
605:Brianboulton
585:
580:Towards home
579:
575:
574:
550:Brianboulton
544:
515:Brianboulton
489:Brianboulton
437:Brianboulton
409:Brianboulton
407:
370:Brianboulton
343:
342:
307:
299:
298:
284:Brianboulton
246:
242:
241:
203:
199:
198:
169:
163:
162:
138:Brianboulton
133:
131:
126:
108:
86:Brianboulton
83:
74:
49:
47:
35:
28:
2243:Laser brain
1597:WP:EXISTING
1447:Looking at
1264:Royal Naval
988:HMS Pandora
710:I think it
657:Dr. Blofeld
170:Dr. Blofeld
142:peer review
115:Clark Gable
54:Laser brain
2162:Cliftonian
2097:Cliftonian
2032:Cliftonian
1969:Cliftonian
1917:Cliftonian
1881:Cliftonian
1843:Cliftonian
1793:Cliftonian
1737:Cliftonian
1687:Cliftonian
1649:Cliftonian
1619:Rob Sinden
1601:Rob Sinden
1563:Rob Sinden
1538:Cliftonian
1483:Rob Sinden
1479:Bounty Day
1459:Rob Sinden
1435:Rob Sinden
1427:HMS Bounty
1389:WP:CHICAGO
1348:Cliftonian
1306:Cliftonian
1293:Royal Navy
1245:Royal Navy
1222:Cliftonian
1180:Cliftonian
1040:Cliftonian
1005:Cliftonian
937:Cliftonian
933:arrived. —
901:Cliftonian
868:Cliftonian
811:Cliftonian
770:Cliftonian
671:Cliftonian
576:Conclusion
328:Cliftonian
268:Cliftonian
227:Cliftonian
184:Cliftonian
149:Cliftonian
92:Cliftonian
2223:WP:FAC/ar
2219:candidate
1393:WP:WAWARD
1364:Robsinden
726:Tim riley
653:Cassianto
649:Tim riley
311:Cassianto
207:Tim riley
2217:: This
1368:Frietjes
1266:vessel
1117:WP:BEGIN
1056:Comments
847:Comments
753:SchroCat
665:SchroCat
50:promoted
2081:Wehwalt
2079:will.--
1385:WP:FOUR
1295:vessel
1291:on the
1262:on the
1256:WP:LEAD
1200:Titanic
1174:Titanic
1170:Titanic
1089:above).
1087:Titanic
999:Pandora
961:Pandora
957:Pandora
931:Pandora
786:Support
745:Support
698:Wehwalt
645:Wehwalt
637:Singora
623:Singora
588:Singora
456:Wehwalt
346:Singora
300:Support
251:Wehwalt
243:Support
200:Support
164:Support
2249:(talk)
2182:Neelix
2167:(talk)
2144:Neelix
2102:(talk)
2037:(talk)
2026:Bounty
1990:- Fine
1974:(talk)
1922:(talk)
1886:(talk)
1848:(talk)
1823:Neelix
1814:- Fine
1798:(talk)
1742:(talk)
1692:(talk)
1654:(talk)
1543:(talk)
1515:Bounty
1501:Bounty
1471:Could
1311:(talk)
1299:Bounty
1289:mutiny
1270:Bounty
1260:mutiny
1251:Bounty
1240:Bounty
1227:(talk)
1216:Bounty
1208:Bounty
1204:Bounty
1185:(talk)
1166:Bounty
1162:Bounty
1158:Bounty
1136:Bounty
1132:Bounty
1125:Bounty
1108:Hello
1083:Bounty
1072:Bounty
1068:Bounty
1064:mutiny
1045:(talk)
1010:(talk)
965:Bounty
942:(talk)
906:(talk)
873:(talk)
816:(talk)
775:(talk)
712:ad rem
693:Bounty
676:(talk)
545:Bounty
427:wrong.
361:silly.
333:(talk)
273:(talk)
247:Bounty
232:(talk)
189:(talk)
154:(talk)
134:Bounty
97:(talk)
75:Bounty
58:FACBot
1247:ship
794:These
125:) in
16:<
2200:talk
2186:talk
2148:talk
2135:tiny
2085:talk
2066:talk
2052:talk
2014:talk
1965:OK —
1941:talk
1875:here
1827:talk
1789:OK —
1708:talk
1637:talk
1623:talk
1605:talk
1586:talk
1577:does
1567:talk
1532:here
1528:hoax
1509:only
1497:here
1487:talk
1463:talk
1439:talk
1431:THIS
1413:talk
1366:and
1350:and
1326:talk
1297:HMS
1279:talk
1268:HMS
1249:HMS
1144:talk
1099:talk
1027:talk
973:talk
835:talk
757:talk
749:here
731:talk
702:talk
663:and
661:Dank
627:talk
609:talk
592:talk
554:talk
519:talk
493:talk
460:talk
441:talk
413:talk
374:talk
350:talk
288:talk
255:talk
212:talk
62:talk
56:via
2237:bot
1534:. —
1517:Day
1476:and
1058::
306:😉
88:, —
52:by
2233:}}
2227:{{
2202:)
2188:)
2150:)
2087:)
2068:)
2054:)
2016:)
1943:)
1829:)
1710:)
1639:)
1625:)
1607:)
1588:)
1569:)
1520:is
1489:)
1465:)
1441:)
1415:)
1391:/
1387:/
1383:/
1379:/
1328:)
1281:)
1146:)
1101:)
1029:)
975:)
837:)
800:)
759:)
704:)
659:,
655:,
651:,
629:)
611:)
594:)
556:)
521:)
495:)
462:)
443:)
415:)
376:)
352:)
290:)
257:)
67:.
33:.
2198:(
2184:(
2146:(
2128:"
2083:(
2064:(
2050:(
2012:(
1939:(
1825:(
1706:(
1635:(
1621:(
1603:(
1584:(
1565:(
1485:(
1461:(
1437:(
1411:(
1395:)
1381:C
1377:T
1375:(
1324:(
1277:(
1142:(
1097:(
1078:.
1025:(
971:(
864:—
833:(
755:(
700:(
625:(
607:(
590:(
552:(
517:(
491:(
458:(
439:(
411:(
372:(
348:(
286:(
253:(
145:—
121:(
113:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.