183:) were the impetus for some of the class' many innovations, but they also led to their uselessness during the First World War—their comparatively slow speed limited them to convoy escorting and home defense, the tasks also assigned to completely obsolete battleships from years before. Their ignominious careers were ended alongside dozens of other warships by the
498:"it provoked enough thought that Proceedings published comments on the story from Captain W.M. Folger, Professor P.R. Alger and David W. Taylor, the former the foremost gunnery expert in the Navy, the latter an up-and-coming officer and future chief constructor." -- you've got three names and two descriptions. I'm not sure who is who here.
473:
Also, it might be worthwhile to introduce HMS Dreadnought in the text, rather than in the quote box. I for one frequently skip over such things and it seemed rather jarring to have
Dreadnought mentioned in the text with no introduction or explanation for why we should care about some random ship and
562:
I've been far busier recently than I expected to be, and the holiday shenanigans haven't helped. If I haven't gotten back to this by Sunday, please archive it—I can always renominate it in the future after addressing the excellent points above. Thank you all for your patience.
284:
I could have sworn that I'd responded to a peer review that you started for this article. Only had time to comment on the first couple of sections, but I don't recall any response, so I didn't pursue it. I couldn't find any peer review, but maybe I'm just imagining
124:
119:
308:
My impression is that my comments there haven't been incorporated into the article, but I could be wrong. Let me know if that's correct or not and I'll work some more on it. BTW, fix any redlinks if they're typos rather than genuine missing
463:
Keep an eye on ENGVAR - the convert template for the 11-inch guns
Poundstone proposed produces "millimetres" for instance. And the tonnage conversion for said design should be rendered as "metric tons", rather than
251:
I've been waiting for other responses to fix all issues at once, but ... that hasn't happened yet. I'll fix these in the next couple days, whether there are more comments or not. Thanks, Nikki.
355:
90:
85:
94:
77:
572:
Okay, tks Ed. I think we've reached that point now, so I'll archive and hope to see it back at some later date once the extant comments are actioned. Cheers,
40:
637:
590:
581:
567:
557:
542:
520:
486:
442:
363:
339:
318:
303:
294:
268:
255:
246:
204:
167:
56:
140:
607:
30:
17:
396:
Stick with either inches or pound when describing armor thicknesses; don't mix them together. That will allow you to get rid of one note as well.
179:
fielded by the United States Navy. Congressionally-mandated weight restrictions (some two to three thousand tons less than the earlier
British
618:
81:
508:
Maybe a line or two about why the Treaty of
Washington required the major sea powers to scrap capital ships would be useful to the reader.
145:
501:
Is USS Possible ever going to be an article? I'm all for redlinks where future expansion is likely, but the article suggests that
415:
The propeller blade required 1000 hp more to rotate at the same speed, or did it cause the relevant engine's output to increase?
73:
66:
200:, where I made the same style choices (including the collapsed infobox). My thanks in advance for all constructive criticism.
548:
Yeah, I'm not sure where Ed is or when he's due back; if not this weekend, say, we'll probably have to archive... Cheers,
191:
264:
and probably a few others. Not sure what you mean by alphabetization and formatting? Poundstone added. Thanks, Nikki.
477:
Why is the citation for the quote in the service history section a parenthetical reference rather than a footnote?
378:
What do you mean by standard in the displacement entry? Washington Treaty definition? Or some other US standard?
438:
314:
290:
184:
351:
538:
242:
516:
482:
611:
299:
I think I asked you via email and you went through a small part of it. It was awhile ago, though.
633:
577:
553:
434:
310:
286:
387:
Coal capacity really isn't of much interest to a casual reader; I relegate it to the main body.
260:
Doublechecking the infobox. (Washington, DC) is there because it can be confused with at least
261:
413:
damaged propeller blade made the starboard engine run at 1,000 horsepower more than the other
534:
238:
610:
has been archived, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
512:
478:
359:
335:
629:
587:
573:
564:
549:
530:
460:"final determinant in a naval battleship" - as opposed to what, an aerial battleship?
300:
265:
252:
201:
164:
53:
111:
418:
412:
405:
399:
625:
176:
408:
Seems kinda redundant, n'est-ce pas? Doesn't completed mean "in all respects"?
197:
384:
Fix the damn red link in
Propulsion and add the boilers to that entry.
470:
Link HMS Dreadnought in the text (as opposed to just the quote box).
125:
Featured article candidates/South
Carolina-class battleship/archive2
120:
Featured article candidates/South
Carolina-class battleship/archive1
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
216:
Draft differs between text and infobox, as do conversions for range
511:
That's all I have. Nice article, I look forward to supporting. --
467:
I believe the lead image should be set to 300px rather than 400.
454:
Agree with Sturm - I don't care much for the collapsed infobox.
231:
Be consistent in whether you include locations for periodicals
457:"a striking power only slightly heavier..." - drop the "only"
393:
Add a space after barbettes to match the other armor entries.
150:
400:
slightly more than the next three battleship classes had
107:
103:
99:
59:
381:
How about some rounding in the beam and draft entries?
433:
How about ISSNs for the journals where available?--
645:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
344:"20th century", "twentieth century": consistency
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
533:. I think reviewers are waitng for responses.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
651:No further edits should be made to this page.
624:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
375:Really, really hate the collapsed infobox.
129:
219:Check alphabetization of journal articles
132:
117:
175:These "epoch" warships were the first
7:
406:, and were completed in all respects
474:the speed at which she could steam.
402:The last word is unnecessary, IMO.
334:"began to believe": year? - Dank (
24:
419:placed into the US Atlantic Fleet
505:was just a design, never a shop.
74:South Carolina-class battleship
67:South Carolina-class battleship
1:
638:22:27, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
591:05:16, 30 December 2013 (UTC)
582:22:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)
568:05:23, 28 December 2013 (UTC)
558:04:36, 27 December 2013 (UTC)
543:17:43, 19 December 2013 (UTC)
521:13:31, 17 December 2013 (UTC)
487:21:39, 16 December 2013 (UTC)
443:00:14, 10 December 2013 (UTC)
364:04:22, 30 November 2013 (UTC)
340:17:04, 29 November 2013 (UTC)
319:15:55, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
304:05:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
295:22:15, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
269:06:37, 28 November 2013 (UTC)
256:05:03, 22 November 2013 (UTC)
247:19:52, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
228:Washington: should specify DC
205:03:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
168:03:57, 11 November 2013 (UTC)
57:10:02, 31 December 2013 (UTC)
586:Thanks, Ian. It'll be back.
430:Fix the link for deck armor.
421:How about simply "assigned"?
237:No citations to Poundstone.
619:featured article candidates
190:This is my first FAC since
31:featured article nomination
668:
424:When was the naval review?
222:FN1, 21: title formatting
648:Please do not modify it.
36:Please do not modify it.
185:Washington Naval Treaty
358:are my edits. - Dank (
212:- spotchecks not done
493:Comments by Coemgenus
225:FN16: capitalization
427:Link light cruiser.
411:This is confusing:
352:standard disclaimer
262:The Navy (London)
171:
158:
157:
659:
650:
623:
617:
614:, and leave the
420:
414:
407:
401:
234:FN23: formatting
161:
130:
115:
97:
48:The article was
38:
667:
666:
662:
661:
660:
658:
657:
656:
655:
646:
621:
615:
495:
88:
72:
70:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
665:
663:
654:
653:
641:
640:
628:goes through.
600:
599:
598:
597:
596:
595:
594:
593:
524:
523:
509:
506:
499:
494:
491:
490:
489:
475:
471:
468:
465:
461:
458:
455:
446:
445:
431:
428:
425:
422:
416:
409:
403:
397:
394:
391:
390:Enlisted what?
388:
385:
382:
379:
376:
367:
366:
345:
342:
326:
325:
324:
323:
322:
321:
276:
275:
274:
273:
272:
271:
235:
232:
229:
226:
223:
220:
217:
173:
172:
163:Nominator(s):
156:
155:
154:
153:
151:External links
148:
143:
135:
134:
128:
127:
122:
69:
64:
63:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
664:
652:
649:
643:
642:
639:
635:
631:
627:
620:
613:
609:
605:
602:
601:
592:
589:
585:
584:
583:
579:
575:
571:
570:
569:
566:
561:
560:
559:
555:
551:
547:
546:
545:
544:
540:
536:
532:
531:User:The ed17
528:
522:
518:
514:
510:
507:
504:
500:
497:
496:
492:
488:
484:
480:
476:
472:
469:
466:
462:
459:
456:
453:
452:
451:
450:
444:
440:
436:
435:Sturmvogel 66
432:
429:
426:
423:
417:
410:
404:
398:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
377:
374:
373:
372:
371:
365:
361:
357:
353:
350:on prose per
349:
346:
343:
341:
337:
333:
332:
331:
330:
320:
316:
312:
311:Sturmvogel 66
307:
306:
305:
302:
298:
297:
296:
292:
288:
287:Sturmvogel 66
283:
282:
281:
280:
270:
267:
263:
259:
258:
257:
254:
250:
249:
248:
244:
240:
236:
233:
230:
227:
224:
221:
218:
215:
214:
213:
211:
210:Source review
207:
206:
203:
199:
196:
194:
188:
186:
182:
178:
170:
169:
166:
160:
159:
152:
149:
147:
144:
142:
139:
138:
137:
136:
131:
126:
123:
121:
118:
116:
113:
109:
105:
101:
96:
92:
87:
83:
79:
75:
68:
65:
62:
60:
58:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
647:
644:
604:Closing note
603:
526:
525:
502:
448:
447:
369:
368:
360:push to talk
347:
336:push to talk
328:
327:
278:
277:
209:
208:
193:Pennsylvania
192:
189:
180:
177:dreadnoughts
174:
162:
146:Citation bot
71:
50:not promoted
49:
47:
35:
28:
535:Graham Colm
309:articles.--
181:Dreadnought
239:Nikkimaria
198:battleship
612:WP:FAC/ar
608:candidate
513:Coemgenus
479:Parsecboy
464:"tonnes".
285:things.--
630:Ian Rose
606:: This
574:Ian Rose
550:Ian Rose
503:Possible
449:Comments
370:Comments
329:Comments
279:Comments
141:Analysis
54:Ian Rose
527:Comment
348:Support
133:Toolbox
91:protect
86:history
195:-class
95:delete
356:These
112:views
104:watch
100:links
16:<
634:talk
578:talk
554:talk
539:talk
517:talk
483:talk
439:talk
315:talk
291:talk
243:talk
108:logs
82:talk
78:edit
626:bot
52:by
636:)
622:}}
616:{{
588:Ed
580:)
565:Ed
556:)
541:)
519:)
485:)
441:)
362:)
354:.
338:)
317:)
301:Ed
293:)
266:Ed
253:Ed
245:)
202:Ed
187:.
165:Ed
110:|
106:|
102:|
98:|
93:|
89:|
84:|
80:|
61:.
33:.
632:(
576:(
552:(
537:(
529:@
515:(
481:(
437:(
313:(
289:(
241:(
114:)
76:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.