581:
to the public at a premium. In the case of the
Pilgrim Tercentenary half dollar, the enabling legislation did not name an organization, but it was the Pilgrim Tercentenary Commission; profits from the coin were to go towards financing the observances in honor of the 300th anniversary of the Pilgrims' arrival."
587:
Good question. Although most bills designated an approved purchaser, for several years from 1918 to 1922, commemorative coin bills copied from each other, basically, and did not state who was to buy them from the mint. I haven't been able to trace specifically what event caused this to change. I've
580:
I'd recast the fourth paragraph by flipping two passive-voice constructions and making a few other tweaks, as follows: "In 1920, the government did not sell commemorative coins—Congress, in authorizing legislation, usually designated a specific organization to buy them at face value and to vend them
98:
This article is about... I think the title speaks for itself. It's a coin, issued for the 300th anniversary of the
Pilgrims' landing. It did start a trend of ripping off coin collectors by being issued in multiple years, so that's not exactly in its favor.
362:
I've cut that image and re-arranged them. The one illustrated on the
Plymouth museum site has somewhat different colors and I think we can make do without this one.--
228:
impeccable quality and consistently formatted. My only question is in the two
Congressional Record refs is "page" spelled out and in the rest it's "p." Why is that?
605:"Smoot, however, stated if the bills had not been reached by" – This phrase uses "reached" in a way unfamiliar to me. Is it a legal term? Are some words missing?
133:
men signed the
Mayflower Compact, whereby all agreed to submit themselves to the will of the majority, and one of the foundation documents of American democracy.
40:
135:— I don't think that quite makes sense as written, although it's clear what you intend, perhaps split off the importance of the doc as a separate sentence
785:
738:
724:
710:
694:
655:
641:
513:
495:
472:
454:
423:
409:
371:
357:
337:
311:
297:
277:
244:
186:
172:
108:
90:
602:"Missouri's William L. Nelson moved that the committee approve the amended bill, and this was carried" – Maybe "this carried"? Is "was" really needed?
755:
30:
17:
766:
632:"sculptor member" seems to be terminology used by the CFA to designate the member representing sculptors, and I'm reluctant to alter it.-
342:
Yes but go to that file, click on the source\photographer link, and the photo that comes up is in no way the source for that painting.
72:
701:
I think I've caught all of what you suggested, though I in a couple of cases used my own words. Thank you for the comments.--
235:
It's as generated by the template. I could, I suppose, do it manually but I imagine the templates are there to be used.--
629:"referred the designs to sculptor member James Earle Fraser" – Perhaps "sculptor James Earle Fraser, a CFA member"?
386:
383:
127:
123:
614:
491:
150:
142:
382:
3) Bradford and
Springfield photos....I can't recall the law on statue photos, I posted a question here:
677:
by
Augustus Saint-Gaudens on the right so that Bradford looks into the page instead of away from it.
781:
720:
690:
651:
538:
It might be more clear to say, "(This side of the coins struck in 1920 does not include the date.)"
165:
759:
555:
551:
487:
554:," – I'd flip this to active voice and add a descriptive adjective for Fraser, thus: "Sculptor
734:
706:
637:
509:
468:
447:
419:
402:
367:
350:
333:
307:
290:
282:
Could add the "Information" template so they have full info like date, author, source, etc?
273:
240:
182:
104:
86:
118:
Usual impeccable stuff, although I'll never get used to "harbor", Just a couple of thoughts
61:
146:
138:
758:
has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see
777:
716:
686:
647:
201:
159:
53:
177:
Much obliged for the support and the review. I've made those changes, more or less.--
211:
730:
702:
633:
505:
464:
440:
415:
395:
363:
343:
329:
303:
283:
269:
236:
222:
Earwig's tool shows no issues; in fact the score is 0.0% !!! mostly offline sources
178:
100:
82:
773:
57:
577:
Maybe "who spoke limited
English" instead of "who spoke at least some English".
325:
322:
2) On the
Landing-Bacon photo, the link goes to a photo of modern boston
214:'s Yellow-faced honeyeater FAC and this looks like the same high quality.
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
613:"Smoot's attempt to bring up an anti-dumping trade bill" – Link to
571:
265:
1) The two photos in the infobox could use better formatting/info
608:
Reached is the word Smoot used. I've changed it to "considered".
145:). It think the point of this is clearer if you skip the pipe
486:
I caught one typo, but I just fixed it myself. Nicely done.--
715:
Looks good to me. Switching to support, as noted above.
65:
206:
I'll never get used to "harbour", "colour", etc. HAHA
793:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
584:If Congress did not designate a vendor, who did?
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article candidates
673:I'd suggest tinkering with the layout to place
550:"Some aspects of the design were criticized by
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
799:No further edits should be made to this page.
772:template in place on the talk page until the
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
588:revised this a bit and added another source.
124:Definitions of Puritanism#Separatist groups
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article candidates
504:Thank you for your review and support.--
558:criticized some aspects of the design,"
268:Not sure what you are looking for. --
7:
24:
253:I find no issues with the writing
73:Pilgrim Tercentenary half dollar
414:Much obliged for the reviews.--
392:4) no issues with other photos
1:
473:04:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
455:20:34, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
424:19:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
410:12:27, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
372:20:07, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
358:19:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
338:19:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
312:20:18, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
298:19:33, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
278:19:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
245:19:15, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
187:22:37, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
173:15:30, 15 February 2017 (UTC)
109:23:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
91:23:35, 13 February 2017 (UTC)
767:featured article candidates
31:featured article nomination
816:
729:Much obliged, thank you.--
574:' in the second paragraph?
439:now. Very nice article.
786:22:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
739:16:31, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
725:14:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
711:09:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
695:18:16, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
656:14:55, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
642:09:34, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
514:11:43, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
496:16:17, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
128:Definitions of Puritanism
796:Please do not modify it.
615:Dumping (pricing policy)
36:Please do not modify it.
151:Plymouth, Massachusetts
143:Plymouth, Massachusetts
122:I'd suggest linking to
64:) 22:31, 6 March 2017
389:was pre-1923 is fine.
195:Comments from HalfGig
463:Thank you indeed.--
556:James Earle Fraser
552:James Earle Fraser
94:
807:
798:
771:
765:
762:, and leave the
452:
445:
407:
400:
355:
348:
295:
288:
210:I just reviewed
205:
170:
114:Support from Jim
79:
48:The article was
38:
815:
814:
810:
809:
808:
806:
805:
804:
803:
794:
769:
763:
528:
448:
441:
403:
396:
351:
344:
291:
284:
199:
197:
166:
147:Plymouth Colony
116:
76:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
813:
811:
802:
801:
789:
788:
776:goes through.
748:
747:
746:
745:
744:
743:
742:
741:
699:
698:
697:
679:
678:
670:
669:
663:
662:
661:
660:
659:
658:
626:
625:
619:
618:
611:
610:
609:
603:
599:
598:
592:
591:
590:
589:
582:
578:
575:
567:
566:
560:
559:
547:
546:
540:
539:
535:
534:
527:
520:
519:
518:
517:
516:
499:
498:
478:
477:
476:
475:
458:
457:
433:
432:
431:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
390:
380:
379:
378:
377:
376:
375:
374:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
302:That's done.--
260:
259:
254:
250:
249:
248:
247:
230:
229:
223:
216:
215:
196:
193:
192:
191:
190:
189:
155:
154:
136:
130:
115:
112:
96:
95:
81:Nominator(s):
75:
70:
69:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
812:
800:
797:
791:
790:
787:
783:
779:
775:
768:
761:
757:
753:
750:
749:
740:
736:
732:
728:
727:
726:
722:
718:
714:
713:
712:
708:
704:
700:
696:
692:
688:
685:
684:
683:
682:
681:
680:
676:
672:
671:
668:
665:
664:
657:
653:
649:
645:
644:
643:
639:
635:
631:
630:
628:
627:
624:
621:
620:
616:
612:
607:
606:
604:
601:
600:
597:
594:
593:
586:
585:
583:
579:
576:
573:
569:
568:
565:
562:
561:
557:
553:
549:
548:
545:
542:
541:
537:
536:
533:
530:
529:
525:
521:
515:
511:
507:
503:
502:
501:
500:
497:
493:
489:
488:Sturmvogel 66
485:
484:
483:
482:
474:
470:
466:
462:
461:
460:
459:
456:
453:
451:
446:
444:
438:
435:
434:
425:
421:
417:
413:
412:
411:
408:
406:
401:
399:
394:
393:
391:
388:
384:
381:
373:
369:
365:
361:
360:
359:
356:
354:
349:
347:
341:
340:
339:
335:
331:
327:
324:
323:
321:
313:
309:
305:
301:
300:
299:
296:
294:
289:
287:
281:
280:
279:
275:
271:
267:
266:
264:
263:
262:
261:
258:
255:
252:
251:
246:
242:
238:
234:
233:
232:
231:
227:
224:
221:
220:Copyvio check
218:
217:
213:
212:User:Casliber
209:
208:
207:
203:
194:
188:
184:
180:
176:
175:
174:
171:
169:
163:
162:
157:
156:
152:
148:
144:
140:
137:
134:
131:
129:
125:
121:
120:
119:
113:
111:
110:
106:
102:
93:
92:
88:
84:
78:
77:
74:
71:
68:
66:
63:
59:
55:
51:
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
795:
792:
752:Closing note
751:
674:
666:
622:
595:
563:
543:
531:
526:by Finetooth
523:
480:
479:
449:
442:
436:
404:
397:
352:
345:
292:
285:
256:
226:Source check
225:
219:
198:
167:
160:
132:
117:
97:
80:
49:
47:
35:
28:
675:The Puritan
623:Preparation
596:Legislation
257:Image check
168:talk to me?
126:instead of
564:Background
158:Good luck
778:Sarastro1
760:WP:FAC/ar
756:candidate
717:Finetooth
687:Finetooth
648:Finetooth
202:Jimfbleak
161:Jimfbleak
54:Sarastro1
754:: This
524:Comments
522:Support
139:Plymouth
50:promoted
731:Wehwalt
703:Wehwalt
634:Wehwalt
532:Infobox
506:Wehwalt
481:Support
465:Wehwalt
443:HalfGig
437:Support
416:Wehwalt
398:HalfGig
364:Wehwalt
346:HalfGig
330:Wehwalt
304:Wehwalt
286:HalfGig
270:Wehwalt
237:Wehwalt
179:Wehwalt
149:(today
141:(today
101:Wehwalt
83:Wehwalt
667:Design
572:guilds
387:answer
385:; the
99:Enjoy.
58:FACBot
570:Link
326:This?
16:<
782:talk
735:talk
721:talk
707:talk
691:talk
652:talk
646:OK.
638:talk
544:Lede
510:talk
492:talk
469:talk
450:talk
420:talk
405:talk
368:talk
353:talk
334:talk
308:talk
293:talk
274:talk
241:talk
183:talk
105:talk
87:talk
62:talk
56:via
774:bot
52:by
784:)
770:}}
764:{{
737:)
723:)
709:)
693:)
654:)
640:)
512:)
494:)
471:)
422:)
370:)
336:)
328:--
310:)
276:)
243:)
185:)
164:-
107:)
89:)
67:.
33:.
780:(
733:(
719:(
705:(
689:(
650:(
636:(
617:?
508:(
490:(
467:(
418:(
366:(
332:(
306:(
272:(
239:(
204::
200:@
181:(
153:)
103:(
85:(
60:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.