239:. There is no indication that there are site editors who review contributions by the fan club members to ensure accuracy, verifiability and neutrality. Some of the articles from other publications and reprinted on the site, authored by specific persons, might be all right as references. But the site is clear that it is not an "official site". —
100:
This article was an FA promotion from 2005. It was previously at FAR, but closed early on a good faith assumption that improvements would continue to be made on the article. Although some improvements were made, the article still has a number of issues:
21:
81:
289:
44:
265:
Suggested FA criteria concern are citations, reliables sources, prose, comprehensiveness, balance, alt text. Also note the recent change to
85:
34:
17:
373:
352:
331:
314:
292:
252:
231:
206:
184:
111:
Other RS issues – reliance on Indian
Railway sources, aboutpalaceonwheels.com, triptoindia.com, self-reference to Knowledge (XXG) (!)
57:
138:
215:
130:
68:
270:
282:
93:
134:
347:
202:
179:
150:
Costs? economy compared to road or water freight? pro/con of rail compared to road/water transport
327:
248:
218:
not a reliable source? Their content is peer-reviewed on their mailing list, and can they not be
266:
105:
More than 60% of the references are from Indian
Railway Fan Club, which is quite clearly not a
274:
227:
89:
194:
368:
106:
360:—this is a great pity, but there's nothing much we can do about it. Way below standard.
114:
The article is not representative of the published body of work on Indian rail transport
341:
310:
198:
173:
323:
240:
220:
generally regarded as trustworthy or authoritative in relation to the subject at hand
126:
R&D section: What about private investment? What exactly has it done since 2003?
223:
361:
305:
171:
To summarize, there are numerous issues with FA criteria 1a, 1b, 1c and 3.
165:
Technical specifications in lots of detail but other things are neglected
43:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
123:
This article focuses too heavily on listcruft, rather than prose
153:
Safety? People hanging off the trains without proper seats?
144:
There are a number of areas where the article lacks info:
61:
381:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
47:). No further edits should be made to this page.
387:No further edits should be made to this page.
33:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
133:is tagged at Commons as missing permission,
45:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured article review
120:A number of unsourced paragraphs/sentences
322:per above; a rewrite would not be amiss.
137:does not have a fair use rationale, and
269:(1c) requiring "high-quality" sources.
162:Complete lack of historical development
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured article review
7:
28:
339:Issues have not been addressed.
141:might be a copyright violation.
193:. Images need alt text as per
1:
348:Make articles, not wikidrama
303:, per FA criteria concerns.
180:Make articles, not wikidrama
117:Inconsistent capitalization
404:
374:11:17, 1 August 2009 (UTC)
353:02:51, 31 July 2009 (UTC)
332:20:02, 24 July 2009 (UTC)
315:04:41, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
293:01:55, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
253:17:23, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
232:18:08, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
207:08:22, 16 July 2009 (UTC)
147:Freight railways in India
139:File:IR sample ticket.jpg
384:Please do not modify it.
185:12:58, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
159:Technology? Good or bad?
40:Please do not modify it.
131:File:Budgam Station.jpg
69:Rail transport in India
35:featured article review
22:Rail transport in India
284:cricket calendar poll!
58:YellowAssessmentMonkey
60:02:24, 3 August 2009
86:WikiProject Trains
82:WikiProject India
75:Review commentary
395:
386:
371:
366:
344:
290:paid editing=POV
285:
277:
245:
176:
52:The article was
42:
403:
402:
398:
397:
396:
394:
393:
392:
391:
382:
369:
362:
351:
340:
283:
275:
261:
259:FARC commentary
241:
183:
172:
156:Train terrorism
107:reliable source
77:
72:
38:
26:
25:
24:
12:
11:
5:
401:
399:
390:
389:
377:
376:
355:
345:
334:
317:
297:
296:
260:
257:
256:
255:
234:
209:
177:
169:
168:
167:
166:
163:
160:
157:
154:
151:
148:
142:
135:File:Bholu.png
129:Image issues:
127:
124:
121:
118:
115:
112:
109:
76:
73:
71:
66:
65:
50:
49:
29:
27:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
400:
388:
385:
379:
378:
375:
372:
367:
365:
359:
356:
354:
349:
343:
338:
335:
333:
329:
325:
321:
318:
316:
312:
308:
307:
302:
299:
298:
295:
294:
291:
286:
281:
279:
278:
272:
268:
263:
262:
258:
254:
250:
246:
244:
238:
235:
233:
229:
225:
221:
217:
213:
210:
208:
204:
200:
196:
192:
189:
188:
187:
186:
181:
175:
164:
161:
158:
155:
152:
149:
146:
145:
143:
140:
136:
132:
128:
125:
122:
119:
116:
113:
110:
108:
104:
103:
102:
98:
97:
95:
91:
87:
83:
74:
70:
67:
64:
62:
59:
55:
48:
46:
41:
36:
31:
30:
23:
19:
383:
380:
363:
357:
336:
319:
304:
300:
287:
276:YellowMonkey
273:
264:
242:
236:
219:
211:
190:
170:
99:
79:
78:
53:
51:
39:
32:
222:? Regards,
94:Dwaipayanc
342:Nishkid64
214:. How is
199:Eubulides
174:Nishkid64
80:Notified
324:Dabomb87
267:WP:WIAFA
243:Mattisse
20: |
237:Comment
224:SBC-YPR
212:Comment
191:Comment
90:Nichalp
54:removed
370:(talk)
358:Delist
337:Delist
320:Delist
301:Delist
195:WP:ALT
216:IRFCA
16:<
364:Tony
328:talk
311:talk
306:Cirt
271:FAQ?
249:Talk
228:talk
203:talk
92:and
56:by
330:)
313:)
288:)
251:)
230:)
205:)
197:.
88:,
84:,
63:.
37:.
350:)
346:(
326:(
309:(
280:(
247:(
226:(
201:(
182:)
178:(
96:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.