Knowledge

:Featured article review/Restoration spectacular/archive1 - Knowledge

Source 📝

175:
Oh goodness, this is just a mess. Large quantities of uncited text, there's some points where statements don't seem to be supported by the citation (see reference 9), the whole thing is written like an essay. This is far from even a GA. 2005 promotion where no significant comments other than
199:
feels like doing a lot of work integrating the huge number of academic sources used into inline citations, it's probably best to leave this alone, allowing it to slip beneath the FA waves. The results of today's generation of nit-pickers crawling all over it are unlikely to be beneficial.
148:, while not an FA, is much better written in that I could more easily deduce that a type of play is the subject of the article. While I don't entirely oppose flowery language in an FA, there's a way to do it ( 143:
This writing is just atrocious for an encyclopedia article. Leaving aside neutrality, I could barely understand what was being discussed from the lead, and to the extent that I could this is more an essay.
152:) and a way not to do it (this). Notwithstanding all that, the last two paragraphs are completely uncited. Overall, this needs work to even be a Good Article. – 40: 161: 289: 250: 230: 209: 185: 165: 133: 259: 30: 17: 270: 110: 102: 106: 157: 72: 285: 226: 153: 181: 145: 94: 205: 129: 82: 61: 281: 246: 222: 53: 196: 177: 86: 201: 98: 277: 125: 90: 57: 242: 176:
categorization were brought up. Definitely not an FA under modern standards.
266:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please leave the 149: 124:
Nominating due to unresolved problems with tone and flowery language. --
39:
Further comments should be made on the article's talk page or at
221:
Issues raised in the review section include prose and sourcing.
65: 241:. Tagged for unsourced statements and style issues. 297:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 303:No further edits should be made to this page. 276:template in place on the talk page until the 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 41:Knowledge talk:Featured article review 7: 195:A vintage piece from 2004. Unless 24: 18:Knowledge:Featured article review 166:02:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC) 134:00:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC) 64:) 0:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC) 1: 111:Knowledge:WikiProject England 103:Knowledge:WikiProject Theatre 290:00:18, 8 November 2020 (UTC) 251:10:47, 31 October 2020 (UTC) 231:19:27, 17 October 2020 (UTC) 107:Knowledge:WikiProject London 210:17:14, 8 October 2020 (UTC) 186:18:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC) 320: 300:Please do not modify it. 36:Please do not modify it. 271:featured article review 73:Restoration spectacular 31:featured article review 146:Restoration comedy 95:User:Bunchofgrapes 260:removal candidate 115: 311: 302: 275: 269: 83:User:Finnusertop 79: 48:The article was 38: 319: 318: 314: 313: 312: 310: 309: 308: 307: 298: 273: 267: 217: 184: 122: 76: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 317: 315: 306: 305: 293: 292: 280:goes through. 253: 235: 234: 216: 213: 193: 192: 180: 173: 172: 154:John M Wolfson 141: 140: 139:John M Wolfson 121: 120:Review section 118: 117: 116: 75: 70: 69: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 316: 304: 301: 295: 294: 291: 287: 283: 279: 272: 265: 261: 257: 254: 252: 248: 244: 240: 237: 236: 233: 232: 228: 224: 219: 218: 214: 212: 211: 207: 203: 198: 197:User:Bishonen 190: 189: 188: 187: 183: 179: 170: 169: 168: 167: 163: 159: 155: 151: 147: 138: 137: 136: 135: 131: 127: 119: 114: 112: 108: 104: 100: 96: 92: 88: 87:User:Bishonen 84: 78: 77: 74: 71: 68: 66: 63: 59: 55: 51: 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 299: 296: 263: 256:Closing note 255: 238: 220: 215:FARC section 194: 174: 142: 123: 99:User:Rjensen 80: 49: 47: 35: 28: 91:User:Geogre 282:Nikkimaria 223:Nikkimaria 81:Notified: 54:Nikkimaria 262:has been 150:Chartwell 264:delisted 258:: This 178:Hog Farm 171:Hog Farm 162:contribs 50:delisted 202:Johnbod 191:Johnbod 239:Delist 126:Beland 58:FACBot 243:DrKay 182:Bacon 16:< 286:talk 247:talk 227:talk 206:talk 158:talk 130:talk 62:talk 56:via 278:bot 52:by 288:) 274:}} 268:{{ 249:) 229:) 208:) 164:) 160:• 132:) 109:, 105:, 101:, 97:, 93:, 89:, 85:, 67:. 33:. 284:( 245:( 225:( 204:( 156:( 128:( 113:. 60:(

Index

Knowledge:Featured article review
featured article review
Knowledge talk:Featured article review
Nikkimaria
FACBot
talk

Restoration spectacular
User:Finnusertop
User:Bishonen
User:Geogre
User:Bunchofgrapes
User:Rjensen
Knowledge:WikiProject Theatre
Knowledge:WikiProject London
Knowledge:WikiProject England
Beland
talk
00:41, 27 September 2020 (UTC)
Restoration comedy
Chartwell
John M Wolfson
talk
contribs
02:16, 28 September 2020 (UTC)
Hog Farm
Bacon
18:03, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
User:Bishonen
Johnbod

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.