Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured list candidates/Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles/archive1 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

308:
British thing? Anyway, happy to restore them now.) One question on the timing issue re: Colin Davis. Elsewhere in the table (for reasons of sorting and comparison, as well as having noticed that most record labels update, too), I use the most current title of the orchestra (e.g., for Ehrling in the 1950s, the Royal Stockholm Philharmonic Orchestra was called the Stockholm Radio Orchestra). If that's the case, then would consistency demand that all knighthoods be retroactively applied, too?
2707: 2257: 2180: 993: 935: 2442:– Thanks for the source review. I have fixed almost everything, and added missing sources for the Sfns with harv error (which were difficult to find, give that I know very less about this list). 3 of the 4 errors are now resolved, but I'm not able to find the source for the remaining one (Ref#117). Should I just remove it as the same info could be verified by other given sources too. Please suggest. – 190:
notes in their personal collections... in particular, Kiki was extremely helpful.) Moreover, citation templates have been used. I have also made use of the work of Sibelius biographers and musicologists, especially in relating the importance of the Sibelius cycle and the historical play-by-play. Thank you, in advance, for your comments and for having taken the time to give the list a read through.
1924:
distributor for Watanabe I rather than Nippon Columbia... thus, I thought it would be important to signal to them that the Nippon Columbia set was the same as the Epic set (I applied the same logic to the Mercury release of Metronome's Ehrling cycle; and, 3) oftentimes, the British distributor (again, along with the U.S., the most important market) was the original label, e.g., HMV/EMI."
1254:
to signal to them that the Nippon Columbia set was the same as the Epic set (I applied the same logic to the Mercury release of Metronome's Ehrling cycle; and, 3) oftentimes, the British distributor (again, along with the U.S., the most important market) was the original label, e.g., HMV/EMI. Is there a solution that would make you happy? I'm all ears!
2788: 2757: 2673: 2642: 2614: 2586: 2009: 1978: 1948: 1916: 1784: 1753: 1696: 1646: 1616: 1586: 1556: 1526: 1492: 1453: 1410: 1380: 1350: 1320: 1246: 1216: 1186: 1147: 1117: 1087: 1057: 1027: 901: 755: 599: 569: 535: 505: 471: 441: 406: 283: 606:. Yes, the appropriate phrasing here is}} something that I have struggled to find. As you indicate, the phrase "incomplete cycle" makes very little sense. And yet, "cycle projects that remained incomplete" seems, though most precise, quite laborious. What I know is this: between Karajan, Bernstein, Ormandy, etc. there are a number of 323:
Orchestra/Sir Edward Elgar". Hmm. Nobody, I think, is going to complain if you use your own discretion here. As to orchestras, I try to use the label current at the time, so that e.g. the Concertgebouw wasn't Royal until it was. But again, I don't think you'll get objections if you choose to standardise on the current title.
2172:
All column headers need colscopes (e.g. `!; rowspan=2 | Conductor` should be `!; rowspan=2 scope=col | Conductor`), including the "secondary" column headers (runtimes 1, 2, etc.). This, combined with the rowscopes you already have, lets non-visual screen reader software accurately read out what cells
941:
both Tawaststjerna and Layton write that it was the LSO, sneaky style. They hint at contractual issues that prohibited the orchestra from being appropriately identified. Could this also explain why the LSO's own history (which I haven't been able to open on my computer/slow internet) doesn't list the
307:
Ah, I can't believe I forgot about Gibson and Barbirolli! (I'm ashamed to admit that, in an earlier draft of this article, I had all Sirs properly knighted, but cut the titles after worrying that I wasn't including titles for other nationalities, you know, fairness and all... or are titles a uniquely
274:
Titles: it is usual to give British and Commonwealth conductors their titles, if knighted. This can be a bit of a pain for the editor, as e.g. Colin Davis recorded his Boston cycle when he was Mr Davis and his LSO Live one after becoming Sir Colin, but it's not too difficult to find out which applied
2500:
I think it must be to the same score, especially per the roman numerals in the preface, presumably SoJ accidentally cited it differently. The information for ref 32 also seems to be cited on page xi. Does that seems sound? On another note, I'm going to attempt to combine some of refs in a row to one
1706:
this request surprised me, because I had previously picked up on other editors switching from the format you requested to the (new?) alternative of, e.g., ]. The advantage of this method is that it looks much cleaner and avoids red links, but the obvious disadvantage, as you noted in your review, is
1253:
include the U.S. distributors for a couple of reasons: 1) along with Britain, the U.S. was the biggest market for Sibelius's music; 2) I figured many readers would be more familiar, e.g., with Epic as the distributor for Watanabe I rather than Nippon Columbia... thus, I thought it would be important
322:
Well, my practice is to apply the performer's title current at the relevant time. Some writers use the last current term, which is OK but can lead to e.g. a bizarre index entry for the Elgar Violin Concerto played by a teenage prodigy conducted by the composer: "Lord Menuhin (violin)/London Symphony
3031:
Fixed some minor table formatting issues, and addressed the "incomplete list" comment- the section has a form inclusion criteria (a conductor who recorded 3+ parts with the same orchestra (but not all 7)), but it was buried in a note instead of in the text. I've made it more prominent. With that, I
826:
a symphony. Is the problem that the citation chain appears after the first sentence of the paragraph but the "Symphony No. 0" phrase appears in the sentence after? If so, should I move the citation chain to after the second? Or is the solution that you would like to see the Breitkopf & Härtel
189:
to the CD (or in the case of one or two entries, LP) liner notes, rather than third party websites such as musicbrainz.org, discogs.com, or musicweb-international.com. (I'd like to here acknowledge, and thank, a handful of users over at talkclassical.com, who generously provided me scans of liner
2234:
Tables need captions- e.g. at the top of the table code put `|+ table_caption_text`. If this text would duplicate a nearby section header, you can hide it from visual browsers like |+ {{sronly|table_caption_text}}. This allows non-visual screen reader software to jump straight to a named table
2483:– Thanks for the link, but it appears that I have used the same booklet for Ref#32, which too appears to refer to this one. Are both the references same.... Silence of Järvenpää has made around 10 edits in last 30 days. Indeed this is an excellent list, and I want it to pass the nomination. – 1923:
The review above had the same thought. I will cut and paste my response to him here: "Include the U.S. distributors for a couple of reasons: 1) along with Britain, the U.S. was the biggest market for Sibelius's music; 2) I figured many readers would be more familiar, e.g., with Epic as the
303:
I apologise for wittering on about the minutiae of British forms of title, but (i) Colin Davis shouldn't be "Sir" for the Boston cycle though he is rightly Sirred for the later two; (ii) Barbirolli and Gibson were both knighted at the time of their cycles and should be Sirred.
184:
Having checked the nominated list against the six FL criteria, I believe it's ready for FLC. As the main editor, I have sought to be neutral and comprehensive in my writing, and the list includes extensive citations. All recording dates, venues, and runtimes are sourced
777:... The volumes of the Complete Edition edited by Glenda Dawn Goss now offer a musicologically accurate music text for the first time. This music text forms the basis for the performance material. The complete edition 'Jean Sibelius Werke' intends to pave the way for a 1832:
It seems to me that the only quibble left undealt with is the one about the LSO recording dates in 1932, a matter so minor as to be barely discernible with the naked eye. Do sort it out if you can, but I'm not delaying my support on that account. So, I'm adding my
1858:
Thanks, Tim. I have long admired your work on the English/British classical music scene; indeed, their quality is what encouraged me to, when I have time, work hard on the Sibelius/Finland classical articles. Glad you enjoyed this one and found it a good read.
658:
Ha! This is my first time every using "cheeky", and I had to look up the term to make sure it wasn't offensive! Okay, well... then I'll merely change the article to "an" (and make sure there are no other "the incomplete cycles" elsewhere in the article).
128: 610:(oops! we're avoiding that word now) recording projects that encompass 3 or more Sibelius symphonies and, in my opinion, need to be mentioned by this article. Can you perhaps help me brainstorm an alternative to "incomplete cycle"? I'm all ears. 742:
Such a perspective thus conceptualizes Kullervo as Sibelius's de facto "Symphony No. 0" and accordingly expands his completed contributions to the symphonic canon from seven to eight" – here and in the main text: says who? Looks like
1677:
Note G: your link to Julius Ruthström takes the reader to a page in Swedish Knowledge (XXG). You shouldn't spring surprises like that on your readers, but should make it clear that it is a cross-Wiki link. One way is like this (from
1109:"According to Robert Layton, Sibelius is said to have referred to Beecham's Sixth as "his favorite recording of any of his symphonies" – did Layton – an English writer, and a good one too – really misspell "favourite" as "favorite"? 923:"the orchestra was credited as the "Royal Philharmonic Orchestra", the musicians were "largely drawn from the London Symphony , which could not be named for contractual reasons" – not according to the LSO's official discography: 1807:
That seems like a longish list of quibbles, and so let me conclude by saying that this seems to me an impressive article, thoroughly researched and scrupulously cited. I look forward to supporting its elevation to FL. –
1970:"With the Schnéevoigt recordings lacking favour" - last word uses the British English spelling, but elsewhere you have words like "conceptualizes" which use the US English spelling - pick one or other and be consistent 954:) says "Royal Philharmonic Orchestra" on the back cover, but in the liner notes: "London’s Royal Philharmonic Society (the pre-Beecham 'old RPO')". The new release of 'rarities' by Warner Classics ( 2461:. I'm not sure where Silence of Järvenpää has gone, but they were awfully excited about this list, so it would be a shame to see all this work fail FLC. I'm thinking the ref in question is for 99: 94: 103: 86: 2200:
Basically, whenever you define a column you should include a "scope=col" in the code, so in your case it would be (in full) "!; rowspan=2 scope=col | Conductor". Check out what I did
2845: 2108: 1608:"the orchestra he led for over three decades" – a usage best avoided, as in British and Commonwealth usage the leader of the orchestra is the principal violinist (Konzertmeister). 2713:
Not sure what you mean here. I see Neeme in the article referenced as Neeme. Is it perhaps that you saw Paavo Järvi, his son, and thought it was an error? Clarification welcome!
497:" – you need to say what the date is, and the later statement "As of 2021, an additional four projected cycles are in progress, according to press releases" is pushing your luck. 955: 1837:
for the elevation of this article to FL. It seems to me to meet all the criteria, and I found it a pleasure to read and to review. A first rate piece of work, in my view.
271:– I'm not sure whether English or American spelling/vocabulary is intended. "Program" for "programme" suggests AmE, but "gramophone" rather than "phonograph" suggests BrE. 841:
As long as there is a citation the contention that Kullervo can be seen as Symphony No 0 (which is after all hardly a very contentious contention) that's fine with me.
2388:
Refs 32, 117, 119 and 127 aren't connecting to their respective Sources (check for typos or incorrect years and then make sure they connect when you hover over them)
144: 2462: 2111:) that Karajan did two recordings of Symphony 5, thats why 2 runtimes. The nominator is not very active on Knowledge (XXG) from last month, still pinging them @ 90: 3045: 3019: 3001: 2973: 2954: 2935: 2916: 2897: 2878: 2857: 2838: 2773: 2736: 2722: 2689: 2658: 2566: 2548: 2524: 2510: 2492: 2474: 2451: 2430: 2416: 2400: 2361: 2331: 2307: 2286: 2272: 2248: 2223: 2195: 2156: 2124: 2102: 2088: 2074: 2056: 2040: 2024: 1994: 1963: 1940:"Karajan left three incomplete cycles, one with the Philharmonia Orchestra and two with the Berlin Philharmonic respectively" - no reason for that last word 1933: 1895: 1868: 1852: 1823: 1799: 1736: 1716: 1661: 1631: 1601: 1571: 1541: 1507: 1468: 1425: 1395: 1365: 1335: 1297: 1283: 1263: 1231: 1201: 1162: 1132: 1102: 1072: 1042: 1012: 979: 916: 873: 856: 836: 725: 707: 668: 653: 633: 619: 584: 550: 520: 486: 456: 421: 372: 352: 338: 317: 298: 255: 230: 199: 176: 65: 343:
Okay. Thanks for permitting me freedom of choice. I think I'll go the route of standardizing on the current title. Ergo, Davis–Boston will have a 'Sir.'
40: 275:
at the time of recording/release. At all events, you ought to avoid a hit-and-miss approach, e.g. giving Beecham his title or not, seemingly at random.
1548:"Nos. 4–5, recorded in 1952; and, Tapiola, 1953]" – two things here: "4–5", rather than "4 and 5" looks odd and the comma before Tapiola looks odder. 963: 357:
Permitting you freedom, forsooth! As if I had authority to permit anything! FAC and FLC reviewers can recommend, but insisting is not on the agenda.
82: 75: 2800: 2769: 2718: 2685: 2654: 2626: 2598: 2268: 2191: 2052: 2020: 1990: 1959: 1929: 1864: 1795: 1764: 1712: 1657: 1627: 1597: 1567: 1537: 1503: 1464: 1421: 1391: 1361: 1331: 1293: 1259: 1227: 1197: 1158: 1128: 1098: 1068: 1038: 1008: 975: 912: 869: 832: 721: 664: 629: 615: 580: 546: 516: 482: 452: 417: 348: 313: 294: 195: 172: 1238:"(the U.S. distributor was Epic)" – here and elsewhere you mention American distribution but not that of other countries. Why single out the US? 959: 149: 943: 591:
Ormandy twice tackled the incomplete cycle" – what is "the incomplete cycle"? I suppose this means Ormandy twice recorded an incomplete cycle.
822:
a lone wolf: as I have tried to demonstrate, many other Sibelius writers (e.g., Tawaststjerna, Rickards, Barnett, Hurwitz, etc.) have called
818:; this article has a subsection under Analysis that addresses the is-it-or-isn't-it-a-symphony back-and-forth.) Nor is Sibelius musicologist 3055: 30: 17: 2982:– The nominator is not very active on Knowledge (XXG) since last month, so I have addressed all your remaining comments, except one about 3010:– Just a courtesy ping for any follow-ups. The nominator has no edits since late August. I have made almost all the remaining changes. – 893:"then in his seventy-fourth year), writing of the septuagenarian conductor" – need we be told a man in his 74th year is a septuagenarian? 2263:
Sorry, I learn by example and am not that great at the technical elements of Knowledge (XXG) code. Would you be kind enough to help me?
2186:
Sorry, I learn by example and am not that great at the technical elements of Knowledge (XXG) code. Would you be kind enough to help me?
2826: 2796: 2765: 2714: 2681: 2650: 2622: 2594: 2264: 2187: 2112: 2048: 2016: 1986: 1955: 1925: 1860: 1791: 1760: 1708: 1653: 1623: 1593: 1563: 1533: 1499: 1460: 1417: 1387: 1357: 1327: 1289: 1255: 1223: 1193: 1154: 1124: 1094: 1064: 1034: 1004: 971: 908: 865: 828: 717: 660: 625: 611: 576: 542: 512: 478: 448: 413: 344: 309: 290: 191: 168: 3070: 2349:
Generally page ranges are "pp." and single pages are "p." this is by no means required, but is the standard, if you are so inclined
970:: I did just purchase the Warner Classics set, and once it arrives in the mail I can see if the liner notes shed any light for us.) 463:
recorded from 1952–55" – alas the eccentricities of the Manual of Style require us to say 1952–1955. God knows why, but there it is.
2093:
Sorry, one more question from me. How come symphony 5 in the incomplete Karajan cycle has two different runtimes listed......? --
1268:
As long as you are happy that you have presented a good global balance, rather than one confined to the US, I have no objections.
1707:
that it surprises the reader. I have changed them, but I would be curious to know what the policy is on this according to MOS.
624:
Ah, I realized you may have been being cheeky... haha, are you just asking me to change the article "the" to the article "an"?
946:) lists the ensemble for Nos. 1–2 as "Symphony Orchestra" (playing it safe, I suppose), whereas the Naxos Historical release ( 2204:
and try to replicate it for the other tables. This is one of those new accessibility things we've been trying to incorporate
1139:"to guest conduct the BBC Symphony Orchestra at Queen's Hall" – it is usual to give the Queen's Hall its definite article 1514:"Karajan (then in the employ of Legge's EMI)" – Karajan contracted with EMI to record for that company but was never an 1178:"conducted many of Sibelius's symphonies on gramophone" – not normal English usage. "For the gramophone" would be normal 815: 1721:
Well, well! I may be out of date on the WP policy on this, and would welcome comments from better-informed editors.
2968: 2949: 966:) says "London Symphony Orchestra". Thus, I admit to being perplexed, but as always, tend to trust Tawaststjerna. ( 2322:
Well I already looked at the sources when we were discussing at my talk page, but let's see what I find now...!
1985:
Oops... Changed to "favor" (not having "favourite", however, since it is a direct quote from a British author).
1688:. I haven't checked, but if there are any other links to non-English Wikipedias you should do likewise for them. 3015: 2997: 2986: 2931: 2912: 2893: 2874: 2853: 2834: 2812: 2732: 2544: 2520: 2488: 2447: 2426: 2396: 2357: 2303: 2219: 2120: 2070: 677:
in Paris, the home of tuneless composers, stood for I Really Can't Abide Music. Kindly do not mention this to
398:
one of the most significant symphonists" – what did he signify? Perhaps you mean most important or best-known.
2634:"in the U.S.)." I would say United States to avoid that awkward full stop/parenthesis/full stop construction. 1680: 2515:
I have merged both the short footnotes. Hopefully, that addresses all the comments of the source review. –
2152: 2098: 2084: 2036: 1891: 1208:"both Metronome … and Decca each began cycles" – either "both" or "each", but not the two of them at once. 1000: 1908:"(released by Mercury Records in the U.S.)" why mention the US? Why not Britain, or some other country? 1079:"would knock Schnéevoigt's Sixth from its perch" – rather slangy for the formal prose of an encylopaedia? 958:) calls the group "The Orchestra of the Royal Philharmonic Society", and and earlier re-release by Koch ( 3007: 2979: 2963: 2944: 240:
Booking my place. Looks top class after first quick read-through. Comments after closer second perusal.
827:
product description cited immediately after the phrase "Symphony No. 0"? Happy to fix how you see fit.
2079:
Sorry, I completely forgot about this one. I'll give it another proper look over the weekend..... --
1685: 802:
completed symphonies by Sibelius is certainly "new", a fact that makes Knowledge (XXG)'s content on
3011: 2993: 2927: 2908: 2889: 2870: 2849: 2830: 2728: 2540: 2539:– Just a courtesy ping the previous concerns were resolved. Is the source review passed? Thanks! – 2516: 2497: 2484: 2458: 2443: 2422: 2392: 2353: 2299: 2215: 2116: 2066: 1845: 1816: 1729: 1288:
Thanks. I am happy, i.e., I think there is global balance due to the natural emphasis on Britain.
1276: 1003:, I cannot get the link you sent about the LSO's own records to open on my computer/slow internet. 849: 700: 646: 365: 331: 248: 223: 3063: 773:"By the time Sibelius was celebrating his major international triumphs in the early 20th century, 268: 2047:
Thanks!! I appreciate your time. I do hope that the article will now have your support. Warmly,
1745:
Note H: "he also recorded the Second two times" – strange English. "Twice" would be normal here.
494: 2829:– can you please clarify the above two points. I have taken care of rest all of the issues. – 2148: 2094: 2080: 2062: 2032: 1887: 951: 947: 712:
Haha... well you have a fellow traveler in me, then. Don't even get me started on Leibowitz's
689: 2368:
The linear notes look fine, there is a lot so hopefully I didn't miss any inconsistencies....
1442: 819: 61: 1772:
Note J: "comprise" is exactly the wrong verb here: the cycle comprises the programmes, not
558: 3039: 2562: 2506: 2470: 2412: 2327: 2282: 2242: 924: 744: 2697: 1840: 1811: 1724: 1271: 844: 695: 641: 360: 326: 243: 218: 2706: 2256: 2179: 992: 934: 682: 673:
The last time anyone called me "cheeky" in Knowledge (XXG) was when I suggested that
862: 763: 2848:) that Karajan did two different recordings of Symphony 5, thats why 2 runtimes. – 2746: 2749:, non-breaking space before the ellipsis in this case. Check all other instances. 1019:"Each of Kajanus's recordings were world premieres – "each" takes a singular verb 120: 1049:"prevented these from coming to fruition – a lot of words to say "prevented it". 287:
Knighted Sirs Thomas, Colin (sans Boston cycle), Simon, Mark, John, and Alexander
3077: 1372:"ten are Finns" – as some of them are dead "are or were" might be advisable here 57: 3034: 2558: 2536: 2502: 2480: 2466: 2439: 2408: 2323: 2278: 2237: 1578:"other notable incomplete Sibelius cycles" – another unsubstantiated "notable" 678: 53: 1441:"Notably, Kullervo eschews obvious categorization" – we could do without the 2407:
Ewen and Goss could do with an identifier or some sort, ISBN or OCLC maybe?
2164: 129:
Featured list candidates/Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles/archive1
3062:, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see 1001:
https://www.naxos.com/SharedFiles/pdf/rear/8.111395r.pdf#.Unfortunately
986:"Fifth (22–23 June) symphonies" – 22 to 24 June according to the LSO 39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
2001:
Notes r and s are not full sentences so should not have full stops
1342:"43 times across 30 conductors" – unexpected choice of preposition 674: 2808:"Select incomplete Sibelius cycles:" does that mean that it's an 781:
and, in particular, of this hitherto editorially neglected work,
2578:"Sibelius cycle" no idea why "cycle" has to be in italics here. 2235:
without having to read out all the text above it to find it. --
1308:"with Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra" – normal usage would be " 2885:
In fact, check all multiple page sources are using pp. not p.
2065:– Just a courtesy ping that your concerns were addressed. – 1638:
Table: poor old DG is misspelled again in the Bernstein row.
747:
without a citation for the supposed expansion of the canon.
2992:, which I'm not sure. Do you have any further comments? – 527:
Notably, a number of conductors" – who say's it's notable?
154: 2665:
43 : The ordinal suffix (e.g., th) is not superscripted.
1484:
Somewhat tendentious title. "Notable" according to whom?
2338: 2295: 2211: 2201: 557:
all titans of twentieth century record" – come come! –
116: 112: 108: 68: 2943:
A prodigious piece of work. Just a few points above.
1905:
Note I haven't read through all the above comments :-)
1402:
Table: entry 30 misspells the recording company's name
2904:"Sibelius: Symphonies Nos. 1-7 " should be en-dash. 2780:"runtime " no spaces between headings and footnotes. 999:
to the liner notes of the Naxos Historical release:
2606:Also no really good reason to bold the symphonies. 493:the Sibelius cycle has, to date, been recorded" – 3086:The above discussion is preserved as an archive. 638:Cheeky! Moi? But yes, that is just what I meant. 2962:Are you going to respond to the other comments? 2107:Well, I am not 100% sure, but it appears to me ( 1477:Notable incomplete Sibelius cycles: 1952–present 942:Kajanus No. 1 and No. 2? The Finlandia release ( 764:Breitkopf & Härtel's own product description 762:. The "Symphony No. 0" turn of phrase is}} from 433:the gramophone" would be a more familiar usage. 43:. No further edits should be made to this page. 3092:No further edits should be made to this page. 3076:template in place on the talk page until the 41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates 29:The following is an archived discussion of a 8: 1881: 211: 133: 2923:" OCLC ????" is there any point to this? 939:Hmmm... well, as I cite in the article... 1884: 692:seem peculiarly allergic to Sibelius. – 214: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates 861:Okay, then I will add the reference to 775:his Symphony 'No. 0' was long forgotten 136: 126: 83:Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles 76:Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles 1704:I would like to note, however, that... 927:" – see note at the end of entry : --> 810:: I am working on an expansion of the 779:new evaluation of the Finnish composer 2501:to hopefully help things move along. 2277:Have added these myself, no worries! 1496:Changed to "Select incomplete cycles" 1434:Complete cycles that include Kullervo 7: 2115:if then could clarify further.... – 794:So, yes... the conceptualization of 2649:3/3 U.S. changed to United States. 1250:This is a good point; however, I... 783:the composer's only choral symphony 2031:That's all I got - great work! -- 1091:De-slanged; changed to "displaced" 816:User:Silence of Järvenpää/Kullervo 24: 2821:Why two runtimes (32:28, 30:46)? 2727:This appears to have been Done – 2457:Many thanks for stepping in here 2786: 2755: 2705: 2671: 2640: 2612: 2584: 2255: 2178: 2007: 1976: 1946: 1914: 1782: 1751: 1694: 1644: 1614: 1584: 1554: 1530:Changed to "under contract with" 1524: 1490: 1451: 1408: 1378: 1348: 1318: 1244: 1214: 1184: 1145: 1115: 1085: 1055: 1025: 997:Hmmm... well, here's the link... 991: 933: 899: 753: 597: 567: 533: 503: 469: 439: 404: 281: 3032:think we're good to promote. -- 1312:Bournemouth Symphony Orchestra" 1220:Deleted "both", retained "each" 3002:17:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 2936:19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2917:19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2898:19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2879:19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2858:17:01, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 2839:19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2737:19:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2525:17:09, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 2511:06:14, 18 September 2021 (UTC) 2493:06:06, 18 September 2021 (UTC) 2475:05:37, 18 September 2021 (UTC) 2452:18:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2431:18:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2401:18:43, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2362:17:31, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2308:16:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2224:16:57, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2157:16:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 2125:16:50, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 2103:16:40, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 2089:18:15, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 2075:17:02, 17 September 2021 (UTC) 1896:16:52, 19 September 2021 (UTC) 509:Added month and used {{As of}} 429:conducted … on gramophone" – " 1: 2974:09:24, 6 September 2021 (UTC) 2680:Removed 1/1 instances found. 3046:14:21, 16 October 2021 (UTC) 3020:12:16, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 2567:06:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC) 2549:12:11, 10 October 2021 (UTC) 806:about a decade out-of-date ( 798:as the first in a series of 66:00:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC) 2955:09:44, 26 August 2021 (UTC) 2774:00:39, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 2723:00:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 2690:00:22, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 2659:00:20, 27 August 2021 (UTC) 2553:Definitely, splendid work. 2417:21:13, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 2332:21:06, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 2294:– I have addressed this in 2287:21:05, 23 August 2021 (UTC) 2273:23:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 2210:– I have addressed this in 2196:23:24, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 2057:23:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 2025:23:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 1995:23:21, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 1964:23:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 1934:23:18, 13 August 2021 (UTC) 3109: 2378:No issues, great sourcing! 1788:Changed to "correspond to" 681:, particularly as fans of 2249:16:42, 18 July 2021 (UTC) 2041:20:40, 15 July 2021 (UTC) 1878:Support from ChrisTheDude 1869:18:30, 10 July 2021 (UTC) 1013:18:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC) 980:18:27, 10 July 2021 (UTC) 726:18:35, 10 July 2021 (UTC) 3089:Please do not modify it. 3071:featured list candidates 2969:Keep wearing the mask... 2950:Keep wearing the mask... 1853:13:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 1824:09:46, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1800:22:13, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1737:22:42, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1717:22:21, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1662:14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1632:03:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1602:03:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1572:03:57, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1542:03:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1508:14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1469:14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1426:14:52, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1396:03:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1366:03:53, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1336:15:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1298:13:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 1284:23:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1264:23:04, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1232:04:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1202:15:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1163:15:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1133:04:00, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1103:23:07, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 1073:15:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 1043:15:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 917:15:18, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 874:13:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 857:13:19, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 837:12:58, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 708:17:04, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 669:13:36, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 654:13:25, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 634:13:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 620:13:10, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 585:15:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 551:15:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 521:03:44, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 487:15:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 457:15:12, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 422:15:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 373:13:23, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 353:13:15, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 339:23:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 318:23:14, 6 July 2021 (UTC) 299:15:06, 5 July 2021 (UTC) 256:22:50, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 231:13:34, 9 July 2021 (UTC) 200:18:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 177:18:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC) 36:Please do not modify it. 31:featured list nomination 2764:5/5 instances changed. 1886:Resolved comments from 1681:Carnival of the Animals 603:Article changed to "an" 216:Resolved comments from 2696:Our article calls him 2163:Accessibility review ( 1620:Changed to "conducted" 1121:Changed to "favourite" 410:Changed to "important" 208:Support from Tim riley 2173:go with what columns. 886:Precursors: 1930–1951 716:Sibelius commentary. 2827:Silence of Järvenpää 2797:Silence of Järvenpää 2766:Silence of Järvenpää 2715:Silence of Järvenpää 2682:Silence of Järvenpää 2651:Silence of Järvenpää 2623:Silence of Järvenpää 2595:Silence of Järvenpää 2465:, would you concur? 2318:Source review – Pass 2265:Silence of Järvenpää 2188:Silence of Järvenpää 2113:Silence of Järvenpää 2049:Silence of Järvenpää 2017:Silence of Järvenpää 1987:Silence of Järvenpää 1956:Silence of Järvenpää 1926:Silence of Järvenpää 1861:Silence of Järvenpää 1792:Silence of Järvenpää 1761:Silence of Järvenpää 1709:Silence of Järvenpää 1654:Silence of Järvenpää 1624:Silence of Järvenpää 1594:Silence of Järvenpää 1564:Silence of Järvenpää 1534:Silence of Järvenpää 1500:Silence of Järvenpää 1461:Silence of Järvenpää 1418:Silence of Järvenpää 1388:Silence of Järvenpää 1358:Silence of Järvenpää 1328:Silence of Järvenpää 1290:Silence of Järvenpää 1256:Silence of Järvenpää 1224:Silence of Järvenpää 1194:Silence of Järvenpää 1155:Silence of Järvenpää 1125:Silence of Järvenpää 1095:Silence of Järvenpää 1065:Silence of Järvenpää 1035:Silence of Järvenpää 1005:Silence of Järvenpää 972:Silence of Järvenpää 909:Silence of Järvenpää 866:Silence of Järvenpää 829:Silence of Järvenpää 718:Silence of Järvenpää 661:Silence of Järvenpää 626:Silence of Järvenpää 612:Silence of Järvenpää 577:Silence of Järvenpää 543:Silence of Järvenpää 513:Silence of Järvenpää 479:Silence of Järvenpää 449:Silence of Järvenpää 414:Silence of Järvenpää 345:Silence of Järvenpää 310:Silence of Järvenpää 291:Silence of Järvenpää 192:Silence of Järvenpää 169:Silence of Järvenpää 2557:for source review. 785:" (emphasis added). 2844:It appears to me ( 2745:"gesture... " see 2337:Version reviewed: 1650:Corrected spelling 1414:Corrected spelling 2972: 2953: 2573:Comments from TRM 2140: 2139: 1830: 1829: 1560:Both changes made 928:0139 on page 243. 180: 162: 161: 3100: 3091: 3075: 3069: 3066:, and leave the 3042: 3037: 3008:The Rambling Man 2991: 2985: 2980:The Rambling Man 2966: 2964:The Rambling Man 2947: 2945:The Rambling Man 2817: 2811: 2794: 2790: 2789: 2763: 2759: 2758: 2709: 2679: 2675: 2674: 2648: 2644: 2643: 2620: 2616: 2615: 2592: 2588: 2587: 2463:this publication 2259: 2245: 2240: 2182: 2015: 2011: 2010: 1984: 1980: 1979: 1954: 1950: 1949: 1922: 1918: 1917: 1885: 1882: 1850: 1848: 1843: 1821: 1819: 1814: 1790: 1786: 1785: 1759: 1755: 1754: 1734: 1732: 1727: 1702: 1698: 1697: 1652: 1648: 1647: 1622: 1618: 1617: 1592: 1588: 1587: 1562: 1558: 1557: 1532: 1528: 1527: 1518:of Legge or EMI. 1498: 1494: 1493: 1459: 1455: 1454: 1416: 1412: 1411: 1386: 1382: 1381: 1356: 1352: 1351: 1326: 1322: 1321: 1281: 1279: 1274: 1252: 1248: 1247: 1222: 1218: 1217: 1192: 1188: 1187: 1153: 1149: 1148: 1123: 1119: 1118: 1093: 1089: 1088: 1063: 1059: 1058: 1033: 1029: 1028: 995: 937: 907: 903: 902: 854: 852: 847: 820:Glenda Dawn Goss 761: 757: 756: 705: 703: 698: 651: 649: 644: 605: 601: 600: 575: 571: 570: 541: 537: 536: 511: 507: 506: 477: 473: 472: 447: 443: 442: 412: 408: 407: 370: 368: 363: 336: 334: 329: 289: 285: 284: 253: 251: 246: 228: 226: 221: 215: 212: 165: 134: 124: 106: 38: 3108: 3107: 3103: 3102: 3101: 3099: 3098: 3097: 3096: 3087: 3073: 3067: 3040: 3035: 2989: 2987:incomplete list 2983: 2926:No, removed. – 2815: 2813:incomplete list 2809: 2787: 2785: 2756: 2754: 2672: 2670: 2641: 2639: 2613: 2611: 2585: 2583: 2575: 2320: 2243: 2238: 2169: 2143:Works for me - 2008: 2006: 1977: 1975: 1947: 1945: 1915: 1913: 1880: 1846: 1841: 1839: 1817: 1812: 1810: 1783: 1781: 1752: 1750: 1730: 1725: 1723: 1695: 1693: 1645: 1643: 1615: 1613: 1585: 1583: 1555: 1553: 1525: 1523: 1491: 1489: 1452: 1450: 1409: 1407: 1379: 1377: 1354:Changed to "by" 1349: 1347: 1319: 1317: 1277: 1272: 1270: 1245: 1243: 1215: 1213: 1185: 1183: 1171:Complete cycles 1146: 1144: 1116: 1114: 1086: 1084: 1056: 1054: 1026: 1024: 900: 898: 850: 845: 843: 754: 752: 701: 696: 694: 647: 642: 640: 598: 596: 568: 566: 534: 532: 504: 502: 470: 468: 440: 438: 405: 403: 366: 361: 359: 332: 327: 325: 282: 280: 249: 244: 242: 224: 219: 217: 210: 97: 81: 79: 34: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 3106: 3104: 3095: 3094: 3082: 3081: 3029: 3028: 3027: 3026: 3025: 3024: 3023: 3022: 3012:Kavyansh.Singh 2994:Kavyansh.Singh 2941: 2940: 2939: 2938: 2928:Kavyansh.Singh 2921: 2920: 2919: 2909:Kavyansh.Singh 2902: 2901: 2900: 2890:Kavyansh.Singh 2883: 2882: 2881: 2871:Kavyansh.Singh 2864: 2863: 2862: 2861: 2860: 2850:Kavyansh.Singh 2846:per the source 2831:Kavyansh.Singh 2819: 2805: 2804: 2782: 2781: 2777: 2776: 2751: 2750: 2742: 2741: 2740: 2739: 2729:Kavyansh.Singh 2702: 2701: 2693: 2692: 2667: 2666: 2662: 2661: 2636: 2635: 2631: 2630: 2608: 2607: 2603: 2602: 2580: 2579: 2574: 2571: 2570: 2569: 2541:Kavyansh.Singh 2534: 2533: 2532: 2531: 2530: 2529: 2528: 2527: 2517:Kavyansh.Singh 2498:Kavyansh.Singh 2485:Kavyansh.Singh 2459:Kavyansh.Singh 2444:Kavyansh.Singh 2436: 2435: 2434: 2433: 2423:Kavyansh.Singh 2405: 2404: 2403: 2393:Kavyansh.Singh 2391:Done 3 of 4 – 2385: 2384: 2380: 2379: 2375: 2374: 2370: 2369: 2366: 2365: 2364: 2354:Kavyansh.Singh 2346: 2345: 2341: 2340: 2319: 2316: 2315: 2314: 2313: 2312: 2311: 2310: 2300:Kavyansh.Singh 2252: 2251: 2231: 2230: 2229: 2228: 2227: 2226: 2216:Kavyansh.Singh 2175: 2174: 2168: 2161: 2160: 2159: 2138: 2137: 2136: 2135: 2134: 2133: 2132: 2131: 2130: 2129: 2128: 2127: 2117:Kavyansh.Singh 2109:per the source 2067:Kavyansh.Singh 2044: 2043: 2028: 2027: 2003: 2002: 1998: 1997: 1972: 1971: 1967: 1966: 1942: 1941: 1937: 1936: 1910: 1909: 1906: 1899: 1898: 1879: 1873: 1872: 1871: 1828: 1827: 1805: 1804: 1803: 1802: 1778: 1777: 1769: 1768: 1747: 1746: 1742: 1741: 1740: 1739: 1690: 1689: 1672: 1671: 1667: 1666: 1665: 1664: 1640: 1639: 1635: 1634: 1610: 1609: 1605: 1604: 1580: 1579: 1575: 1574: 1550: 1549: 1545: 1544: 1520: 1519: 1511: 1510: 1486: 1485: 1479: 1478: 1474: 1473: 1472: 1471: 1447: 1446: 1436: 1435: 1431: 1430: 1429: 1428: 1404: 1403: 1399: 1398: 1374: 1373: 1369: 1368: 1344: 1343: 1339: 1338: 1314: 1313: 1305: 1304: 1303: 1302: 1301: 1300: 1240: 1239: 1235: 1234: 1210: 1209: 1205: 1204: 1180: 1179: 1173: 1172: 1168: 1167: 1166: 1165: 1141: 1140: 1136: 1135: 1111: 1110: 1106: 1105: 1081: 1080: 1076: 1075: 1051: 1050: 1046: 1045: 1021: 1020: 1016: 1015: 988: 987: 983: 982: 969: 930: 929: 920: 919: 895: 894: 888: 887: 883: 882: 881: 880: 879: 878: 877: 876: 809: 801: 792: 791: 790: 789: 788: 787: 786: 784: 780: 776: 759:Citation added 749: 748: 739: 738: 737: 736: 735: 734: 733: 732: 731: 730: 729: 728: 715: 690:René Leibowitz 593: 592: 588: 587: 563: 562: 554: 553: 529: 528: 524: 523: 499: 498: 490: 489: 465: 464: 460: 459: 435: 434: 426: 425: 400: 399: 393: 392: 388: 387: 386: 385: 384: 383: 382: 381: 380: 379: 378: 377: 376: 375: 277: 276: 272: 263: 262: 235: 234: 209: 203: 188: 182: 181: 167:Nominator(s): 160: 159: 158: 157: 155:External links 152: 147: 139: 138: 132: 131: 78: 73: 72: 46: 45: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 3105: 3093: 3090: 3084: 3083: 3080:goes through. 3079: 3072: 3065: 3061: 3057: 3053: 3050: 3049: 3048: 3047: 3044: 3043: 3038: 3021: 3017: 3013: 3009: 3005: 3004: 3003: 2999: 2995: 2988: 2981: 2977: 2976: 2975: 2970: 2965: 2961: 2960: 2959: 2958: 2957: 2956: 2951: 2946: 2937: 2933: 2929: 2925: 2924: 2922: 2918: 2914: 2910: 2906: 2905: 2903: 2899: 2895: 2891: 2887: 2886: 2884: 2880: 2876: 2872: 2868: 2867: 2865: 2859: 2855: 2851: 2847: 2843: 2842: 2841: 2840: 2836: 2832: 2828: 2823: 2822: 2820: 2814: 2807: 2806: 2802: 2798: 2793: 2784: 2783: 2779: 2778: 2775: 2771: 2767: 2762: 2753: 2752: 2748: 2744: 2743: 2738: 2734: 2730: 2726: 2725: 2724: 2720: 2716: 2712: 2708: 2704: 2703: 2699: 2695: 2694: 2691: 2687: 2683: 2678: 2669: 2668: 2664: 2663: 2660: 2656: 2652: 2647: 2638: 2637: 2633: 2632: 2628: 2624: 2619: 2610: 2609: 2605: 2604: 2600: 2596: 2591: 2582: 2581: 2577: 2576: 2572: 2568: 2564: 2560: 2556: 2552: 2551: 2550: 2546: 2542: 2538: 2526: 2522: 2518: 2514: 2513: 2512: 2508: 2504: 2499: 2496: 2495: 2494: 2490: 2486: 2482: 2478: 2477: 2476: 2472: 2468: 2464: 2460: 2456: 2455: 2454: 2453: 2449: 2445: 2441: 2432: 2428: 2424: 2421:Added OCLC – 2420: 2419: 2418: 2414: 2410: 2406: 2402: 2398: 2394: 2390: 2389: 2387: 2386: 2383:Verifiability 2382: 2381: 2377: 2376: 2372: 2371: 2367: 2363: 2359: 2355: 2351: 2350: 2348: 2347: 2343: 2342: 2339: 2336: 2335: 2334: 2333: 2329: 2325: 2317: 2309: 2305: 2301: 2297: 2293: 2290: 2289: 2288: 2284: 2280: 2276: 2275: 2274: 2270: 2266: 2262: 2258: 2254: 2253: 2250: 2247: 2246: 2241: 2233: 2232: 2225: 2221: 2217: 2213: 2209: 2206: 2205: 2203: 2199: 2198: 2197: 2193: 2189: 2185: 2181: 2177: 2176: 2171: 2170: 2166: 2162: 2158: 2154: 2150: 2146: 2142: 2141: 2126: 2122: 2118: 2114: 2110: 2106: 2105: 2104: 2100: 2096: 2092: 2091: 2090: 2086: 2082: 2078: 2077: 2076: 2072: 2068: 2064: 2060: 2059: 2058: 2054: 2050: 2046: 2045: 2042: 2038: 2034: 2030: 2029: 2026: 2022: 2018: 2014: 2005: 2004: 2000: 1999: 1996: 1992: 1988: 1983: 1974: 1973: 1969: 1968: 1965: 1961: 1957: 1953: 1944: 1943: 1939: 1938: 1935: 1931: 1927: 1921: 1912: 1911: 1907: 1904: 1903: 1901: 1900: 1897: 1893: 1889: 1883: 1877: 1874: 1870: 1866: 1862: 1857: 1856: 1855: 1854: 1851: 1849: 1844: 1836: 1826: 1825: 1822: 1820: 1815: 1801: 1797: 1793: 1789: 1780: 1779: 1775: 1771: 1770: 1766: 1762: 1758: 1749: 1748: 1744: 1743: 1738: 1735: 1733: 1728: 1720: 1719: 1718: 1714: 1710: 1705: 1701: 1692: 1691: 1687: 1683: 1682: 1676: 1675: 1674: 1673: 1669: 1668: 1663: 1659: 1655: 1651: 1642: 1641: 1637: 1636: 1633: 1629: 1625: 1621: 1612: 1611: 1607: 1606: 1603: 1599: 1595: 1591: 1582: 1581: 1577: 1576: 1573: 1569: 1565: 1561: 1552: 1551: 1547: 1546: 1543: 1539: 1535: 1531: 1522: 1521: 1517: 1513: 1512: 1509: 1505: 1501: 1497: 1488: 1487: 1483: 1482: 1481: 1480: 1476: 1475: 1470: 1466: 1462: 1458: 1449: 1448: 1444: 1440: 1439: 1438: 1437: 1433: 1432: 1427: 1423: 1419: 1415: 1406: 1405: 1401: 1400: 1397: 1393: 1389: 1385: 1376: 1375: 1371: 1370: 1367: 1363: 1359: 1355: 1346: 1345: 1341: 1340: 1337: 1333: 1329: 1325: 1316: 1315: 1311: 1307: 1306: 1299: 1295: 1291: 1287: 1286: 1285: 1282: 1280: 1275: 1267: 1266: 1265: 1261: 1257: 1251: 1242: 1241: 1237: 1236: 1233: 1229: 1225: 1221: 1212: 1211: 1207: 1206: 1203: 1199: 1195: 1191: 1182: 1181: 1177: 1176: 1175: 1174: 1170: 1169: 1164: 1160: 1156: 1152: 1143: 1142: 1138: 1137: 1134: 1130: 1126: 1122: 1113: 1112: 1108: 1107: 1104: 1100: 1096: 1092: 1083: 1082: 1078: 1077: 1074: 1070: 1066: 1062: 1053: 1052: 1048: 1047: 1044: 1040: 1036: 1032: 1023: 1022: 1018: 1017: 1014: 1010: 1006: 1002: 998: 994: 990: 989: 985: 984: 981: 977: 973: 967: 965: 961: 957: 953: 949: 945: 940: 936: 932: 931: 926: 922: 921: 918: 914: 910: 906: 897: 896: 892: 891: 890: 889: 885: 884: 875: 871: 867: 863: 860: 859: 858: 855: 853: 848: 840: 839: 838: 834: 830: 825: 821: 817: 813: 807: 805: 799: 797: 793: 782: 778: 774: 772: 771: 770: 769: 768: 767: 765: 760: 751: 750: 746: 741: 740: 727: 723: 719: 713: 711: 710: 709: 706: 704: 699: 691: 688: 684: 683:Pierre Boulez 680: 676: 672: 671: 670: 666: 662: 657: 656: 655: 652: 650: 645: 637: 636: 635: 631: 627: 623: 622: 621: 617: 613: 609: 604: 595: 594: 590: 589: 586: 582: 578: 574: 565: 564: 560: 556: 555: 552: 548: 544: 540: 531: 530: 526: 525: 522: 518: 514: 510: 501: 500: 496: 492: 491: 488: 484: 480: 476: 467: 466: 462: 461: 458: 454: 450: 446: 437: 436: 432: 428: 427: 423: 419: 415: 411: 402: 401: 397: 396: 395: 394: 390: 389: 374: 371: 369: 364: 356: 355: 354: 350: 346: 342: 341: 340: 337: 335: 330: 321: 320: 319: 315: 311: 306: 305: 302: 301: 300: 296: 292: 288: 279: 278: 273: 270: 267: 266: 265: 264: 260: 259: 258: 257: 254: 252: 247: 237: 236: 233: 232: 227: 222: 213: 207: 204: 202: 201: 197: 193: 186: 179: 178: 174: 170: 164: 163: 156: 153: 151: 148: 146: 143: 142: 141: 140: 135: 130: 127: 125: 122: 118: 114: 110: 105: 101: 96: 92: 88: 84: 77: 74: 71: 69: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 48:The list was 44: 42: 37: 32: 27: 26: 19: 3088: 3085: 3059: 3052:Closing note 3051: 3033: 3030: 2942: 2824: 2791: 2760: 2747:MOS:ELLIPSIS 2710: 2676: 2645: 2617: 2589: 2554: 2437: 2321: 2291: 2260: 2236: 2207: 2183: 2149:ChrisTheDude 2144: 2095:ChrisTheDude 2081:ChrisTheDude 2063:ChrisTheDude 2033:ChrisTheDude 2012: 1981: 1951: 1919: 1888:ChrisTheDude 1875: 1838: 1834: 1831: 1809: 1806: 1787: 1773: 1756: 1722: 1703: 1699: 1679: 1649: 1619: 1589: 1559: 1529: 1515: 1495: 1456: 1413: 1383: 1353: 1323: 1309: 1269: 1249: 1219: 1189: 1150: 1120: 1090: 1060: 1030: 996: 938: 904: 842: 823: 811: 803: 795: 758: 693: 686: 639: 607: 602: 572: 538: 508: 474: 444: 430: 409: 358: 324: 286: 241: 239: 229: 205: 183: 166: 150:Citation bot 80: 49: 47: 35: 28: 2698:Neeme Järvi 2373:Reliability 2296:these edits 2212:these edits 814:article at 2866:Ref 4 pp. 2344:Formatting 1902:;Comments 1774:vice versa 1445:"notably". 687:a fortiori 679:User:Dmass 573:De-puffed! 238:;Comments 3064:WP:FLC/ar 3058:has been 3056:candidate 2621:Removed. 2593:Removed. 1842:Tim riley 1813:Tim riley 1726:Tim riley 1443:editorial 1324:Corrected 1273:Tim riley 1190:Corrected 1151:Corrected 1061:Corrected 1031:Corrected 846:Tim riley 697:Tim riley 643:Tim riley 475:Corrected 445:Corrected 362:Tim riley 328:Tim riley 269:WP:ENGVAR 245:Tim riley 220:Tim riley 3060:promoted 3054:: This 2795:Removed 2711:Doing... 2261:Doing... 2184:Doing... 2165:MOS:DTAB 1876:Comments 1516:employee 824:Kullervo 812:Kullervo 804:Kullervo 796:Kullervo 495:WP:DATED 206:Comments 187:directly 145:Analysis 50:promoted 2907:Done – 2888:Done – 2869:Done – 2352:Done – 2145:support 1835:support 1757:Changed 1590:Deleted 1457:Deleted 1384:Changed 962:) and ( 905:Trimmed 714:asinine 608:notable 539:Deleted 261:General 137:Toolbox 100:protect 95:history 1686:Turban 559:WP:PEA 104:delete 58:FACBot 2559:Aza24 2537:Aza24 2503:Aza24 2481:Aza24 2467:Aza24 2440:Aza24 2409:Aza24 2324:Aza24 2279:Aza24 1700:Done, 1670:Notes 800:eight 745:WP:OR 675:IRCAM 121:views 113:watch 109:links 54:PresN 16:< 3036:Pres 3016:talk 2998:talk 2932:talk 2913:talk 2894:talk 2875:talk 2854:talk 2835:talk 2801:talk 2792:Done 2770:talk 2761:Done 2733:talk 2719:talk 2686:talk 2677:Done 2655:talk 2646:Done 2627:talk 2618:Done 2599:talk 2590:Done 2563:talk 2555:Pass 2545:talk 2521:talk 2507:talk 2489:talk 2471:talk 2448:talk 2427:talk 2413:talk 2397:talk 2358:talk 2328:talk 2304:talk 2298:. – 2292:Done 2283:talk 2269:talk 2239:Pres 2220:talk 2214:. – 2208:Done 2202:here 2192:talk 2153:talk 2121:talk 2099:talk 2085:talk 2071:talk 2061:Hi @ 2053:talk 2037:talk 2021:talk 2013:Done 1991:talk 1982:Done 1960:talk 1952:Done 1930:talk 1920:Done 1892:talk 1865:talk 1847:talk 1818:talk 1796:talk 1765:talk 1731:talk 1713:talk 1658:talk 1628:talk 1598:talk 1568:talk 1538:talk 1504:talk 1465:talk 1422:talk 1392:talk 1362:talk 1332:talk 1294:talk 1278:talk 1260:talk 1228:talk 1198:talk 1159:talk 1129:talk 1099:talk 1069:talk 1039:talk 1009:talk 976:talk 968:Note 964:here 960:here 956:here 952:here 950:and 948:here 944:here 925:here 913:talk 870:talk 851:talk 833:talk 808:Note 722:talk 702:talk 685:and 665:talk 648:talk 630:talk 616:talk 581:talk 547:talk 517:talk 483:talk 453:talk 418:talk 391:Lead 367:talk 349:talk 333:talk 314:talk 295:talk 250:talk 225:talk 196:talk 173:talk 117:logs 91:talk 87:edit 62:talk 56:via 3078:bot 2147:-- 1684:): 1310:the 431:for 52:by 3074:}} 3068:{{ 3018:) 3000:) 2990:}} 2984:{{ 2934:) 2915:) 2896:) 2877:) 2856:) 2837:) 2816:}} 2810:{{ 2772:) 2735:) 2721:) 2688:) 2657:) 2565:) 2547:) 2523:) 2509:) 2491:) 2473:) 2450:) 2429:) 2415:) 2399:) 2360:) 2330:) 2306:) 2285:) 2271:) 2222:) 2194:) 2155:) 2123:) 2101:) 2087:) 2073:) 2055:) 2039:) 2023:) 1993:) 1962:) 1932:) 1894:) 1867:) 1798:) 1715:) 1660:) 1630:) 1600:) 1570:) 1540:) 1506:) 1467:) 1424:) 1394:) 1364:) 1334:) 1296:) 1262:) 1230:) 1200:) 1161:) 1131:) 1101:) 1071:) 1041:) 1011:) 978:) 915:) 872:) 864:. 835:) 766:: 724:) 667:) 632:) 618:) 583:) 549:) 519:) 485:) 455:) 420:) 351:) 316:) 297:) 198:) 175:) 119:| 115:| 111:| 107:| 102:| 98:| 93:| 89:| 70:. 64:) 33:. 3041:N 3014:( 3006:@ 2996:( 2978:@ 2971:) 2967:( 2952:) 2948:( 2930:( 2911:( 2892:( 2873:( 2852:( 2833:( 2825:@ 2818:? 2803:) 2799:( 2768:( 2731:( 2717:( 2700:. 2684:( 2653:( 2629:) 2625:( 2601:) 2597:( 2561:( 2543:( 2535:@ 2519:( 2505:( 2487:( 2479:@ 2469:( 2446:( 2438:@ 2425:( 2411:( 2395:( 2356:( 2326:( 2302:( 2281:( 2267:( 2244:N 2218:( 2190:( 2167:) 2151:( 2119:( 2097:( 2083:( 2069:( 2051:( 2035:( 2019:( 1989:( 1958:( 1928:( 1890:( 1863:( 1794:( 1776:. 1767:) 1763:( 1711:( 1656:( 1626:( 1596:( 1566:( 1536:( 1502:( 1463:( 1420:( 1390:( 1360:( 1330:( 1292:( 1258:( 1226:( 1196:( 1157:( 1127:( 1097:( 1067:( 1037:( 1007:( 974:( 911:( 868:( 831:( 720:( 663:( 628:( 614:( 579:( 561:! 545:( 515:( 481:( 451:( 424:, 416:( 347:( 312:( 293:( 194:( 171:( 123:) 85:( 60:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates
featured list nomination
Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates
PresN
FACBot
talk
00:25, 17 October 2021 (UTC)

Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles
Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles
edit
talk
history
protect
delete
links
watch
logs
views
Featured list candidates/Discography of Sibelius symphony cycles/archive1
Analysis
Citation bot
External links
Silence of Järvenpää
talk
18:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Silence of Järvenpää
talk
18:21, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Tim riley

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.