297:
And then "16,020 long tons (16,280 t)"..... looks like an inconsistent conversion is being used, or truncation of division not be used consistently. On second thoughts, it might be a sourcing issue. Either way, (and especially now I've seen 20,000 long tons (20,000 t)) the inconsistency needs to be
667:"Most of the heavy cruisers were used as commerce raiders during the war," – Is this referring to the Spanish Civil War, the only war mentioned in this paragraph, or World War II? Presumably the paragraph switches to World War II at some point if not there, and this needs to be made clear.
715:"The O-class ships were significantly larger, faster, and more powerful. These ships, however, were also not built." – If they were never built, they couldn't be larger, faster OR more powerful. They "would have been significantly larger, faster and more powerful." Or something similar.
387:"Admiral Graf Spee was meanwhile scuttled after the Battle of the River Plate" this sentence troubles me. "was meanwhile" doesn't read brilliantly i would remove meanwhile, also what was scuttled mean? As I'm not aware of this term, if there is a wikilink to it that would help
718:"to build 50,000 long tons (51,000 t) of heavy cruisers, enough for five 10000-long ton ships." – Inconsistent displacement notage. "10000-long ton ships" appears to be the only time in the whole list that a conversion isn't given, and no comma is used in a long number.
174:
709:
Actually, both should have hyphens - when used with a noun (like battlecruiser, ship, etc.) the name of the class is treated as a compound adjective. The only time hyphens aren't used is when the class name is used by itself, (i.e,. the ships of the O
117:
729:
Navies at this time, especially the German Navy, were routinely violating treaty restrictions - the treaty system had largely fallen apart in 1937 when Japan backed out, anyway. That said, this article really isn't the place to discuss
396:"Admiral Hipper was scuttled by her crew after having been heavily damaged..." not keen on 'after having been' reads awkwardly, would change to "Admiral Hipper was scuttled by her crew due to heavy damage sustained by RAF bombers."
569:
D class, "In 1933, Hitler authorized...". Although I have a hard time believing anyone might not know who Hitler was, I would suggest giving his full name, position and linking to his article on the first occurrence of his
677:
The prose states that "The treaty limited large German warships to a displacement of 10,000 long tons (10,160 t)" but in the table, the displacements are all around 15,000 long tons: could the reason for this be stated
185:
once this article makes FL. I feel this list is very close to FL quality, and I look forward to working with reviewers in ensuring it meets the criteria. Thanks in advance to all who take the time to review the list.
735:
In the "Deutschland class" section, you use a lower case 't' for treaty, but in "Admiral Hipper class" you use a capital "T". I don't really have a preference either way, but you need to be consistent.
173:
Another list of German warships, this one comprises all of the heavy cruisers built or designed by
Germany in the 1920s through 1940s. The list has already passed a MILHIST A-class review (see
693:
Incidentally, the ship's page and the class page both have the "10,000 long tons (10,000 t)" problem, so it might be worth having a look around all the articles in the proposed GT for this!
706:"..three O class battlecruisers. The O-class ships.." – remove the hyphen from the second use of O class here. The lead also uses a hyphen in the third paragraph, remove that too!
88:
83:
789:
It just seems inconsistent that on the ship's article it states that "The ultimate fate of Lützow is unclear" but in this article no allusion is made at all to the uncertainty.
92:
420:- the MOS actually says that any number that can be expressed in one or two words can be either spelled out or in Arabic numerals. I prefer to spell out numbers less than 50.
390:
You relink a few terms in the
Deutschland class that were linked in the lead such as the Spanish Civil War, yet World War II is not linked in that section, any reason why?
75:
384:
states numbers over nine should use their numerical form and not be spelled out. twenty-two needs in the first para needs to be in numerals, can see a few more as well.
703:
In the D class section the prose states "20,000 long tons (20,000 t)" presumably this needs to change to "20,000 long tons (20,321 t)" as is used in the table.
133:
681:"Lützow was re-floated by the Soviet Navy and expended as a target in July 1947." – I have no idea at all what that means. Some explanation would be nice.
40:
211:
For the ships with 10,000 t displacement, the lead shows them as having 9,800 long tons of displacement, but the body shows 10,000 in multiple places.
826:
799:
766:
752:
613:
599:
585:
555:
530:
504:
482:
440:
408:
369:
344:
327:
279:
258:
235:
195:
165:
79:
30:
17:
240:
I don't really like messing with alt text, since, as far as I'm aware, they still haven't figured out what exactly is useful for alt text.
138:
783:
article suggests there is some disagreement about the final fate of the Lützow; but only one fate is listed in this list as "fact".
246:
A result of a disagreement over the eventual fate of the ship - one source says 1958-59, another says 1960. Updated to reflect this.
71:
64:
813:- It all looks quite solid to me, and I'm not seeing any issues- Harrias's above point looks to be settled in the article. --
726:
Again for the
Admiral Hipper class, is there a reason that the displacement is so much higher than the Treaty allowed them?
466:
The sentence is grammatically fine (past perfect rather than simple past), though there is a passive voice issue. How does "
540:: All used images appear to be free and are properly tagged as such. By the way, the lead image could use some cropping.
393:"but Hitler allowed only increases to..." swap allowed and only round so it reads, "but Hitler only allowed increases..."
786:
Prager is based on the declassified Soviet archives, the others are works from the 60s-80s, and thus less reliable.
780:
323:
275:
576:
This comment does not effect my support, as it is quite minor. Prose, sourcing and images all look solid.
178:
243:
The tonnage discrepancy was a convert template error, should have been 10,000 long tons, not metric tons.
609:
581:
319:
294:"10,000 long tons (10,000 t)" but "50,000 long tons (51,000 t)", so should 10,000 long tons be 10,200 t?
271:
229:
417:
762:
595:
548:
478:
340:
254:
191:
161:
306:
797:
750:
640:
605:
577:
526:
500:
436:
404:
365:
820:
223:
53:
182:
758:
591:
543:
474:
336:
250:
187:
157:
652:. Is there a reason for them being different (I speak no German), or is one a typo?
791:
744:
721:
10,000 long tons is converted above, you don't need to convert a number every time.
634:
473:
s crew scuttled the ship after she sustained heavy damage from RAF bombers" sound?
291:"panzerschiffe " my German is rusty but shouldn't that be Panzerschiffe throughout?
109:
685:
522:
496:
432:
400:
381:
361:
815:
454:
216:
The text says Lutzow was scrapped in the 1950s, but the table says 1960.
671:
302:
39:
Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in
118:
Featured list candidates/List of heavy cruisers of
Germany/archive1
590:
That's a fair point - added first name, link, and position.
779:
In fact, going a little bit deeper on this last point, the
143:
335:
Should all be addressed, thanks for reviewing the list.
105:
101:
97:
57:
648:, but in the third paragraph, and again in P-class:
305:
for row and col spans (to assist screen readers per
738:Why no reference in the table for the fate of the
696:Why no reference in the table for the fate of the
834:The above discussion is preserved as an archive.
221:Ref 10 should give the page range as pp., not p.
43:. No further edits should be made to this page.
840:No further edits should be made to this page.
41:Knowledge (XXG) talk:Featured list candidates
29:The following is an archived discussion of a
8:
315:"in Bikini Atoll" or "in the Bikini Atoll"?
622:
355:
265:
122:
431:Fair enough, hadn't noticed that before.
625:
565:- Overall looks good, just one comment:
358:
268:
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured list candidates
125:
115:
604:Thank you! Everything looks good now.
207:Alt text for the images would be nice.
181:, which will be ready to head over to
757:Everything else should be addressed.
7:
644:In the first paragraph you spell it
674:in the "Deutschland class" section?
24:
72:List of heavy cruisers of Germany
65:List of heavy cruisers of Germany
627:Resolved comments from Harrias
1:
614:12:22, 23 February 2012 (UTC)
600:23:41, 22 February 2012 (UTC)
586:17:24, 19 February 2012 (UTC)
556:23:34, 18 February 2012 (UTC)
531:10:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
505:10:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
483:00:06, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
441:10:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
409:23:34, 16 February 2012 (UTC)
370:10:56, 17 February 2012 (UTC)
280:11:07, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
345:02:14, 9 February 2012 (UTC)
328:11:06, 8 February 2012 (UTC)
259:12:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
236:02:54, 26 January 2012 (UTC)
196:01:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
166:01:49, 17 January 2012 (UTC)
857:
781:German cruiser Deutschland
312:"canceled" or "cancelled"?
177:), and is the capstone to
827:19:39, 9 March 2012 (UTC)
800:12:44, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
767:12:28, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
753:11:18, 4 March 2012 (UTC)
837:Please do not modify it.
309:) in each of the tables.
298:resolved or explained...
36:Please do not modify it.
31:featured list nomination
495:That sounds fine to me
360:Resolved comments from
270:Resolved comments from
457:, removed "meanwhile"
56:21:10, 12 March 2012
776:
775:
516:
515:
354:
353:
169:
151:
150:
848:
839:
823:
818:
794:
747:
684:Does linking to
637:
626:
623:
554:
551:
546:
472:
359:
356:
320:The Rambling Man
272:The Rambling Man
269:
266:
232:
226:
154:
123:
113:
95:
38:
856:
855:
851:
850:
849:
847:
846:
845:
844:
835:
821:
816:
792:
745:
670:Could you link
635:
632:;Comments from
549:
544:
541:
470:
460:No real reason.
301:Need to follow
230:
224:
86:
70:
68:
34:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
854:
852:
843:
842:
830:
829:
807:
806:
805:
804:
803:
802:
774:
773:
772:
771:
770:
769:
736:
733:
732:
731:
724:
723:
722:
716:
713:
712:
711:
704:
701:
698:Admiral Scheer
694:
691:
690:
689:
679:
675:
668:
665:
664:
663:
629:
628:
621:
620:
619:
618:
617:
616:
574:
573:
572:
559:
558:
534:
533:
514:
513:
512:
511:
510:
509:
508:
507:
488:
487:
486:
485:
468:Admiral Hipper
464:
461:
458:
448:
447:
446:
445:
444:
443:
424:
423:
422:
421:
398:
397:
394:
391:
388:
385:
373:
372:
352:
351:
350:
349:
348:
347:
317:
316:
313:
310:
299:
295:
292:
283:
282:
264:
263:
262:
261:
247:
244:
241:
218:
213:
208:
201:Quick comments
171:
170:
156:Nominator(s):
149:
148:
147:
146:
144:External links
141:
136:
128:
127:
121:
120:
67:
62:
61:
46:
45:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
853:
841:
838:
832:
831:
828:
825:
824:
819:
812:
809:
808:
801:
798:
796:
795:
788:
787:
785:
784:
782:
778:
777:
768:
764:
760:
756:
755:
754:
751:
749:
748:
741:
737:
734:
728:
727:
725:
720:
719:
717:
714:
708:
707:
705:
702:
699:
695:
692:
688:clarify this?
687:
683:
682:
680:
676:
673:
669:
666:
661:
657:
656:Panzerschiffe
654:
653:
651:
647:
646:Panzerschiffe
643:
642:
641:
639:
638:
631:
630:
624:
615:
611:
607:
603:
602:
601:
597:
593:
589:
588:
587:
583:
579:
575:
571:
567:
566:
564:
561:
560:
557:
553:
552:
547:
539:
536:
535:
532:
528:
524:
521:
518:
517:
506:
502:
498:
494:
493:
492:
491:
490:
489:
484:
480:
476:
469:
465:
462:
459:
456:
452:
451:
450:
449:
442:
438:
434:
430:
429:
428:
427:
426:
425:
419:
415:
414:
413:
412:
411:
410:
406:
402:
395:
392:
389:
386:
383:
380:
379:
378:
375:
374:
371:
367:
363:
357:
346:
342:
338:
334:
333:
332:
331:
330:
329:
325:
321:
314:
311:
308:
304:
300:
296:
293:
290:
289:
288:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
267:
260:
256:
252:
248:
245:
242:
239:
238:
237:
233:
227:
222:
219:
217:
214:
212:
209:
206:
205:
204:
202:
198:
197:
193:
189:
184:
180:
176:
168:
167:
163:
159:
153:
152:
145:
142:
140:
137:
135:
132:
131:
130:
129:
124:
119:
116:
114:
111:
107:
103:
99:
94:
90:
85:
81:
77:
73:
66:
63:
60:
58:
55:
51:
48:The list was
44:
42:
37:
32:
27:
26:
19:
836:
833:
814:
810:
790:
743:
739:
697:
662:is singular.
660:Panzerschiff
659:
655:
650:Panzerschiff
649:
645:
633:
568:
562:
542:
538:Image review
537:
519:
467:
399:
376:
318:
286:
220:
215:
210:
200:
199:
179:this project
172:
155:
139:Citation bot
69:
49:
47:
35:
28:
686:target ship
658:is plural,
606:Dana boomer
578:Dana boomer
382:MOS:NUMBERS
678:somewhere?
453:Linked to
418:WP:NUMERAL
225:Giants2008
54:Giants2008
759:Parsecboy
592:Parsecboy
475:Parsecboy
455:Scuttling
337:Parsecboy
307:WP:ACCESS
251:Parsecboy
188:Parsecboy
158:Parsecboy
377:Comments
287:Comments
134:Analysis
50:promoted
811:Support
793:Harrias
746:Harrias
740:Blücher
710:class).
672:caliber
636:Harrias
563:Support
520:Support
303:MOS:DTT
249:Fixed.
126:Toolbox
89:protect
84:history
523:NapHit
497:NapHit
463:Fixed.
433:NapHit
401:NapHit
362:NapHit
93:delete
730:this.
570:name.
550:raise
183:WP:GT
110:views
102:watch
98:links
16:<
817:Pres
763:talk
610:talk
596:talk
582:talk
545:Good
527:talk
501:talk
479:talk
437:talk
416:See
405:talk
366:talk
341:talk
324:talk
276:talk
255:talk
231:Talk
192:talk
175:here
162:talk
106:logs
80:talk
76:edit
52:by
765:)
742:?
612:)
598:)
584:)
529:)
503:)
481:)
439:)
407:)
368:)
343:)
326:)
278:)
257:)
234:)
203:–
194:)
164:)
108:|
104:|
100:|
96:|
91:|
87:|
82:|
78:|
59:.
33:.
822:N
761:(
700:?
608:(
594:(
580:(
525:(
499:(
477:(
471:'
435:(
403:(
364:(
339:(
322:(
274:(
253:(
228:(
190:(
160:(
112:)
74:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.