51:
147:– I'm beginning to wonder if it's wise to select so many works of famous late 19th century Impressionists and Post-Impressionists as FPs. Of course one is a fan of Van Gogh and many others from the era, but I'm thinking it might be more interesting (and educational) to feature more obscure artists. Just a thought.
244:
does not affect how interesting or educational an image is; it actually has very little effect on readers. The POTD process is what draws attention, and I or whoever is in charge at the time can handle that when it comes time for it. We have 43 FPs of map projections, but no complaints yet (even
65:, who hold the painting, note “The model's immobility contrasts with the undulating hair and beard, echoed and amplified in the hallucinatory arabesques of the background”, but I think the secret is in the rather haunted eyes.
211:
be FPs, only that it would be refreshing to vary the mix with talented but often ignored artists (not from France or the Low
Countries), such as Baluschek, Liebermann, Corinth and various Scandinavian and Russian painters.
190:
No, they remain what they are. My thinking is, they're familiar to many people, whereas less-well-known artists would be a learning experience – and perhaps intriguing as something new to viewers/readers.
226:
I agree entirely that there should also be lesser-known artists work here, but my original point still stands: that does not affect the inherent notability of the works or images themselves. -
530:
95:
520:
525:
17:
168:
But does that affect the inherent notability of the works or images themselves? There may be an embarassment of riches for the late C19th
61:(1853–90); this is one of 43 self portraits by van Gogh; he would often paint himself because it was cheaper then paying for a model. The
330:– The painting merits its own article, instead of only a spot in an image gallery, and this would solve the issue of the EV. – Editør (
207:, and his late style, while often entrancing, is familiar to most culturally literate people. I'm not suggesting his works should
50:
374:
283:
83:
79:
240:
It doesn't matter how many works from a single artist we feature, so long as they all have the proper EV. Being featured
506:
493:
476:
455:
437:
416:
399:
386:
353:
335:
322:
299:
254:
235:
221:
181:
159:
139:
122:
290:
isn't really that high. Enough to feature one self-portrait (which we have), but not enough for a group of them. —
344:
There's one written and ready to go live once I can sort out the right format for the title... Any suggestions? -
135:
295:
250:
407:– well done Schro. So you discovered that it was his last, eh? Because it was - and that's heavy EV.
203:
In this instance, Van Gogh is arguably the most famous personality in
Western art of the Modern Era
412:
395:
331:
451:
382:
370:
349:
231:
177:
118:
489:
131:
62:
362:
310:
291:
287:
246:
103:
87:
58:
472:
408:
514:
503:
447:
433:
425:
378:
345:
318:
227:
217:
173:
155:
114:
485:
468:
172:, but other eras or movements will have their moments in the spotlight. -
429:
366:
314:
213:
151:
500:
Promoted File:Vincent van Gogh - Self-Portrait - Google Art
Project.jpg
282:- With so many self-portraits by van Gogh to choose from, the EV in
49:
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
149:(There are four Van Goghs in the FPC queue right now.)
96:Knowledge:Featured pictures/Artwork/Paintings
8:
531:Featured picture nominations/February 2015
245:after 10 or so have already been run). —
205:(though others could be argued as well)
73:A great copy of a very well-known work
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
7:
76:Articles in which this image appears
521:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
1:
494:03:56, 25 February 2015 (UTC)
477:16:38, 23 February 2015 (UTC)
456:22:14, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
446:Cheers, Sca - many thanks! -
438:22:10, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
417:22:01, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
400:21:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
387:20:22, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
375:Van Gogh self-portrait (1889)
354:17:54, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
336:17:43, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
323:15:57, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
300:00:18, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
284:Portraits of Vincent van Gogh
255:00:12, 22 February 2015 (UTC)
236:17:20, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
222:17:15, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
182:15:43, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
160:15:37, 21 February 2015 (UTC)
140:19:51, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
123:08:39, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
84:Portraits of Vincent van Gogh
80:Van Gogh self-portrait (1889)
526:Featured picture nominations
373:, an article now exists at
57:– Self portrait (1889), by
547:
92:FP category for this image
507:08:47, 2 March 2015 (UTC)
66:
39:Voting period ends on
53:
424:– Nice, quick work,
111:Support as nominator
67:
206:
150:
47:
28:A van Gogh selfie
538:
288:Vincent van Gogh
204:
148:
104:Vincent van Gogh
88:Vincent van Gogh
59:Vincent van Gogh
38:
36:
546:
545:
541:
540:
539:
537:
536:
535:
511:
510:
428:. Interesting.
130:But of course.
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
544:
542:
534:
533:
528:
523:
513:
512:
497:
496:
479:
461:
460:
459:
458:
441:
440:
419:
402:
389:
359:
358:
357:
356:
339:
338:
325:
302:
274:
273:
272:
271:
270:
269:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
258:
257:
196:
195:
194:
193:
192:
191:
185:
184:
163:
162:
142:
125:
107:
106:
101:
98:
93:
90:
77:
74:
71:
45:08:39:03 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
543:
532:
529:
527:
524:
522:
519:
518:
516:
509:
508:
505:
501:
495:
491:
487:
483:
480:
478:
474:
470:
466:
463:
462:
457:
453:
449:
445:
444:
443:
442:
439:
435:
431:
427:
423:
420:
418:
414:
410:
406:
403:
401:
397:
393:
390:
388:
384:
380:
376:
372:
368:
364:
361:
360:
355:
351:
347:
343:
342:
341:
340:
337:
333:
329:
326:
324:
320:
316:
312:
308:
307:
303:
301:
297:
293:
289:
285:
281:
280:
276:
275:
262:
261:
260:
259:
256:
252:
248:
243:
239:
238:
237:
233:
229:
225:
224:
223:
219:
215:
210:
202:
201:
200:
199:
198:
197:
189:
188:
187:
186:
183:
179:
175:
171:
170:at the moment
167:
166:
165:
164:
161:
157:
153:
146:
143:
141:
137:
133:
132:Étienne Dolet
129:
126:
124:
120:
116:
112:
109:
108:
105:
102:
99:
97:
94:
91:
89:
85:
81:
78:
75:
72:
69:
68:
64:
63:Musée d'Orsay
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
499:
498:
481:
464:
421:
404:
391:
327:
305:
304:
278:
277:
241:
208:
169:
144:
127:
110:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
363:Crisco 1492
292:Crisco 1492
247:Crisco 1492
41:2 Mar 2015
515:Categories
394:– Editør (
409:Hafspajen
504:Armbrust
448:SchroCat
379:SchroCat
346:SchroCat
228:SchroCat
174:SchroCat
115:SchroCat
55:Original
486:Godot13
482:Support
465:Support
422:Support
405:Support
392:Support
328:Comment
145:Comment
128:Support
100:Creator
371:Editør
311:Crisco
309:– Per
306:Oppose
279:Oppose
242:per se
70:Reason
469:Jobas
426:Schro
209:never
16:<
490:talk
473:talk
452:talk
434:talk
413:talk
396:talk
383:talk
377:. -
350:talk
332:talk
319:talk
296:talk
286:and
251:talk
232:talk
218:talk
178:talk
156:talk
136:talk
119:talk
430:Sca
367:Sca
315:Sca
214:Sca
152:Sca
43:at
517::
502:--
492:)
475:)
467:-
454:)
436:)
415:)
398:)
385:)
369:,
365:,
352:)
334:)
321:)
313:.
298:)
253:)
234:)
220:)
180:)
158:)
138:)
121:)
113:–
86:,
82:,
488:(
484:-
471:(
450:(
432:(
411:(
381:(
348:(
317:(
294:(
249:(
230:(
216:(
176:(
154:(
134:(
117:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
