51:
248:
changing from one language to another doesn't bother me, and I'm reluctant to enforce rules that are not in writing, but I see your point that readers on
English who click on the image would benefit from a caption in English, so I'll edit the description on Commons. I'm also going to start a discussion on the talk page proposing that Criteria 7 include a requirement that the description must be in English. --
247:
I am nominating the image for its value on
English Knowledge, not Commons, but the description page is on Commons. I am wary of one Wiki such as English telling another Wiki such as Commons what to do with its pages such as the image's info page, I'm used to working in multilingual enviroments so
213:. While non-English speaking people are welcome to use it, it is not a multilingual Encyclopaedia, there are other versions if you want to use one in a language other than English and I'm quite happy for you to nominate this at
291:
after taking another look at the image, the quality is not good enough when viewed full size, and after looking more at
Criteron 7 I think this file could use a fuller description. --
205:
For crying out loud the criterion is "Has a descriptive, informative and complete file description". That can hardly apply if an
English speaking person can't read it! This is
164:
As with a couple of noms last week, description page needs to be in
English for enwiki as per Criterion 7 (is it that much to ask that nominators please take to checking this
353:
343:
229:, so why don't you go ahead and nominate something there written in a foreign language and see what happens? Let's have a bit of commonsense please! --
95:
138:
186:
Criteria 7 says nothing about requiring the description page to be in
English. Also, the description page is on Commons, not English Knowledge. --
348:
17:
222:
134:
328:
315:
301:
283:
258:
238:
196:
177:
156:
142:
124:
50:
83:
133:: Although it illustrates tree branches nicely, I don't see anything particularly special about it.
217:
without an
English description. What do you think would happen to an article that was nominated at
152:
79:
279:
234:
173:
298:
255:
193:
121:
337:
325:
312:
103:
71:
218:
275:
230:
169:
87:
293:
250:
188:
116:
75:
65:
Large and aesthetically interesting image used in several articles
49:
150:
has good EV showing the structure of branches on a tree.
321:
35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
221:
that was written in say French? Well funnily enough
225:also doesn't specify it has to be written in
8:
214:
354:Featured picture nominations/January 2013
96:Knowledge:Featured pictures/Plants/Others
18:Knowledge:Featured picture candidates
7:
68:Articles in which this image appears
223:Knowledge:Featured article criteria
344:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
135:Pirated windows 7 install disc
1:
349:Featured picture nominations
329:18:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
316:18:34, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
302:18:11, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
284:03:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
259:17:58, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
239:03:01, 3 February 2013 (UTC)
197:20:22, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
178:02:56, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
157:18:13, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
143:17:55, 1 February 2013 (UTC)
125:20:09, 31 January 2013 (UTC)
370:
92:FP category for this image
58:
39:Voting period ends on
274:Fails Criterion 7. --
53:
322:Withdrawn nomination
112:Support as nominator
84:Pinus classification
209:Commons, it is the
127:
59:
219:Featured Articles
211:English Knowledge
110:
47:
361:
300:
257:
215:sk.wikipedia.org
195:
123:
80:Plant morphology
38:
36:
369:
368:
364:
363:
362:
360:
359:
358:
334:
333:
292:
249:
187:
168:nominating). --
115:
57:– Tree branches
37:
34:
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
367:
365:
357:
356:
351:
346:
336:
335:
332:
331:
309:Not Promoted
307:
305:
304:
286:
268:
267:
266:
265:
264:
263:
262:
261:
242:
241:
200:
199:
181:
180:
159:
145:
128:
107:
106:
101:
98:
93:
90:
69:
66:
63:
45:20:09:26 (UTC)
33:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
366:
355:
352:
350:
347:
345:
342:
341:
339:
330:
327:
323:
320:
319:
318:
317:
314:
310:
303:
299:
297:
296:
290:
287:
285:
281:
277:
273:
270:
269:
260:
256:
254:
253:
246:
245:
244:
243:
240:
236:
232:
228:
224:
220:
216:
212:
208:
204:
203:
202:
201:
198:
194:
192:
191:
185:
184:
183:
182:
179:
175:
171:
167:
163:
160:
158:
155:
154:
149:
146:
144:
140:
136:
132:
129:
126:
122:
120:
119:
113:
109:
108:
105:
102:
99:
97:
94:
91:
89:
85:
81:
77:
73:
72:Branch collar
70:
67:
64:
61:
60:
56:
52:
48:
46:
42:
29:
26:
19:
308:
306:
294:
288:
271:
251:
226:
210:
206:
189:
165:
161:
151:
147:
130:
117:
111:
54:
44:
40:
32:
27:
338:Categories
88:Scots Pine
41:9 Feb 2013
326:Armbrust
313:Armbrust
289:Withdraw
162:Comment.
104:Teslaton
55:Original
28:Branches
272:Oppose.
227:English
153:Calhoun
148:Support
100:Creator
166:before
131:Oppose
76:Branch
62:Reason
276:jjron
231:jjron
170:jjron
16:<
295:Pine
280:talk
252:Pine
235:talk
190:Pine
174:talk
139:talk
118:Pine
207:not
43:at
340::
324:.
311:--
282:)
237:)
176:)
141:)
114:--
86:,
82:,
78:,
74:,
278:(
233:(
172:(
137:(
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
