Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/Delaware Bay 1639 - Knowledge (XXG)

Source 📝

184:. High quality, high encyclopedic value in the three articles. I know this isn't a formal FPC requirement, but since the image text is in Dutch, and presumably it adds significant value to the image, I'd like to see a translation on the image page. For the close reader of an image, the text is integral to its meaning and interpretation, particularly where the text forms such a large and important part of the image, as here. I know this text is in old Dutch, in cursive, so it probably needs a native speaker. I'm contacting some User_nl Wikipedians, and on the presumption that the text can be translated, this can be considered a full support. Without the translation I'll switch down to a weak support. 670:
one disputes that. But everyone already knows in a general sense that this was Delaware Bay under Dutch colonial rule: does that factor really merit outright opposition after similar maps by the same cartographer have been promoted? Do individual reviewers get to impose new criteria by personal fiat after consensus discussion fails to implement them? Gentlemen, this is an excellent way to drive off contributors. NuclearWarfare spent many long hours working on this restoration; it's his first nominee. I hope this doesn't become the norm because it is not easy to recruit and train people for this work.
510:
it is we are actually looking at. I am certain that the latter of these is true here, I am unsure of the former. Previous Vinckeboons images have not included such text, and have merely denoted placenames (which are themselves somewhat congruent with other maps, and useful as historical information in themselves). If I don't find anyone in the next few days, I'm going to get an old (18th C) Dutch dictionary and have a go at doing it myself - I'm in a history department where we do this kind of thing all the time.
34: 466:; the inability of modern native speakers to read historic manuscripts in certain languages was one of the reasons, and Gerard's attempts to decipher Vinckeboons were specifically discussed. The Vinckeboons restorations are the most time consuming and difficult we have ever produced at this project; these take 80 hours of labor. Please evaluate according to agreed criteria and discuss in a collaborative spirit. 390:) 06:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC) The language is seventeenth century Dutch and it is essentially a foreign language to contemporary Dutch. The characters are different, the spelling is different.. The notion of "spamming" is disrespectful for the massive amount of work in here. Given support by demanding a translation is also very much of a similar disrespect for important historic material om this subject. 669:
Surprised to see that notion gaining any traction at all--particularly with long time regulars. This cartographer's work was specifically discussed in advance when the proposal was put forward. Two native speakers have been unable to translate the caption. Certainly translation would be useful; no
590:
I have some experience in paleography, but my knowledge of obsolete Dutch is nonexistent. Nevertheless, I'll say that the first half of the text on the left seems to deal with the native inhabitants of the area; the two-column list there is clearly a list of the names of Indian tribes or settlements
537:
As a native speaker of Dutch, I would like to give it a try. I've tried to read it and could easily make out some words. My problem though is that I can't make out the handwriting. If someone could write it down for me, I'll try to translate it for you. The sentence "vrouwen als sij bevrucht sijn in
864:
It now has quite prominent placement. I also really want to know what the chart says. I have a friend who specializes in translating ancient languages, except that friend is currently in Iceland on a sabbatical. For some reason, he left his phone in a box on his desk in America when he left. So, if
509:
I like to think that I would like (but not require) translations of image texts where the request is both; reasonable: there are Wikipedians who can read it, doing so is not particularly time consuming (the text is limited), and is integral to the image and provides important information about what
628:
summarising in more detail exactly what would be expected, and what would be excepted. Eg, when it is possible to translate but hasn't been, why shouldn't we be able to oppose on the basis that the EV could be improved by a translation (even if just approximate)? This happens all the time - people
619:
For the record, I don't know if the proposal to make translations part of the FPC criteria was outright rejected. Looking back at it, it seems like there was more discussion than any actual conclusions, and some of the actual 'votes' of opposition were based on incorrect assumptions (like the fact
752:
Exactly. See what a reasonable effort toward translation will do for you? Precisely why I conditionally supported. The effort here has been reasonable and even though the language is old, we still got a rough idea of its content, even if the first translation "effort" wasn't even worth a try. I'm
650:
I think you've hit the nail on the head. Regardless of the outcome of that previous discussion or a further one, a reasonably argued oppose based on insufficient EV would be acceptable, as are other EV related opposes (note: I'm not making a specific comment on
488:
content that any native Dutch speaker can decipher. It has a lot of EV, and even more now after my edits, but the translation is key to EV. Translations may not be in criteria, but EV is subjective, and IMO, translations are essential for enough EV.
483:
comes back with. After such pessimism regarding 19th century Japanese translations, I have a feeling a translation will be found here. I'll even settle for a "it most likely says...based on the current language". Not convinced there isn't at least
715:
Are you implying this is an unreasonable request? This image has a block of text more than 150 words long. An effort to get a translation only helps the encyclopedia. What does your preference do to help the encyclopedia? Why are we
60:. After a short time, the initial 32 inhabitants were murdered by local Indians and Godyn sold his land back to the West India Company. The Company kept the names of the local area, including Godyn's Bay, which eventually became 771:
I don't think there's any need to make a point of it; it's hard work, and I'd like to thank Massimo Cantarinella for having a go. I've put the partial translation on the image page, with appropriate caveats.
683:
I'm sorry, did someone oppose because of this reason? I know NuclearWarfare, and know that he is better than to be significantly wounded by reasonable requests for more information. Apparently you doubt him?
176: 463: 922: 81: 289:. Prominence in an article is not a requirement. What is is that the image adds to the section it is placed in, and relates well to the text it illustrates. 912: 422:
The language used is what is at issue. This is important material, even important historic material with or without translations and it deserves respect.
624:
on all documents with any non-English text, which isn't true - there would be common sense exceptions). IMO, it would be worth asking the question again
330:
upon a reasonably effort to find a translation (and only then). I'm also updating the caption, having done some work on New Netherland related topics.
458:(ec) Wadester, Gerard is a native Dutch speaker. Two previous maps by this same artist have been promoted to FP without translation. Translation is 17: 917: 572:
why a translation can be so helpful! Anyway, I did my best on interpreting the the text. You can see it at Massimo Catarinella's talk page.
738:
It is in old Dutch, and to that extent it's difficult. Still we now know that it talks about female cannibalism, which increases the EV.
204: 112: 57: 865:
you can wait three months, I might be able to help, if not, well, here's to hoping that the rest of you can tell me what this means.
848:
First rate restoration. I also agree a translation would add to it's EV, it already has good EV but a translation would be better. —
85: 786:
Agreed. Nice work. All I ask is for a reasonable effort be made to try. This now makes the map that much more interesting.
629:
oppose images because there is room for improvement in the composition/colour balance, sharpness, etc, so why not EV too?
543: 898: 880: 856: 840: 799: 781: 766: 747: 733: 710: 697: 678: 664: 645: 600: 585: 564: 556:
interesting sentence to have on a nautical chart, makes me want to know what the whole block of text says even more! —
547: 532: 519: 502: 474: 451: 431: 417: 399: 372: 343: 320: 298: 281: 244: 226: 212: 193: 161: 138: 538:
kinderen" (which I can make out) means women who are pregnant or literally: women who are fertilized with children. --
404:
I'm sorry that I removed it one from article it added almost nothing to, but added to two articles that required it?
171: 777: 743: 539: 515: 294: 189: 154: 53: 208: 894: 240: 793: 760: 727: 691: 579: 496: 445: 411: 366: 337: 314: 836: 773: 739: 511: 480: 290: 259: 185: 147: 104: 890: 874: 304: 275: 120: 108: 41: 258:
My my now, quite the nomination team. Here's the thing. It's only real exposeure is on the page
427: 395: 387: 236: 33: 717: 788: 755: 722: 686: 639: 574: 491: 440: 406: 361: 332: 309: 753:
glad another Dutch speaker gave it a shot. The content turned out to be very interesting.
660: 222: 56:, in 1629. Godyn made his land claim to the West India Company under jurisdiction of the 832: 596: 356: 352: 95: 77: 45: 831:: I strongly agree that a translation would be nice, even if only for the image page. 355:
as it was essentially spamming the article. Only "home" location in the article is at
906: 867: 268: 423: 391: 383: 263: 100: 73: 61: 266:
page. Good image though. Fix this then click on the golden phone to get my vote.
704: 672: 630: 526: 468: 382:
This is a great restoration of "a map of the "Svydt" river in "niew nederland".
132: 49: 850: 656: 558: 218: 592: 262:. The others have higher placed, larger images. At least up the size in the 438:
I'm speaking of your spamming reference. Please re-read if necessary.
359:, which already has an image that does a better job than this would. 80:
colony. Very high resolution; see also compressed courtesy copy at
32: 217:
Please sign in to vote, and ensure you address the criteria. --
303:
Added to more appropriate articles (i.e. now it's in its
82:File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14 courtesy copy.jpg 462:an FPC criterion; the proposal to require it was 702:Unreasonable requests are a different matter. 307:); this should fill your need for better use. 887:Promoted File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14.jpg 8: 64:. Ink and watercolor with pictorial relief. 52:founded by Samuel Godyn, a director of the 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 923:Featured picture nominations/October 2009 357:New Netherland#South River and New Sweden 72:Nautical chart of seventeenth century 7: 203:per nom. My house is in the map! 913:Ended featured picture nominations 113:Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions 58:Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions 44:("Swanendael") and Godyn's Bay in 24: 86:File:Delaware_Bay_Vinckeboons.jpg 591:(as they sounded to the Dutch). 76:during its time as part of the 91:Articles this image appears in 1: 918:Featured picture nominations 899:20:49, 25 October 2009 (UTC) 881:21:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 857:16:30, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 841:10:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 800:15:42, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 782:05:26, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 767:04:45, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 748:03:55, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 734:02:37, 23 October 2009 (UTC) 711:20:18, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 698:20:00, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 679:19:42, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 665:12:26, 22 October 2009 (UTC) 646:10:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 601:15:23, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 586:21:24, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 565:19:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 548:18:36, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 533:14:59, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 520:07:56, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 503:06:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 475:06:30, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 452:06:49, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 432:06:22, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 418:06:15, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 400:06:13, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 373:06:02, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 344:05:32, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 321:05:52, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 299:04:39, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 282:04:17, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 245:22:32, 20 October 2009 (UTC) 227:10:57, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 213:04:01, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 194:03:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC) 177:17:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC) 162:16:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC) 139:16:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC) 939: 54:Dutch West India Company 231:, Sorry, this was me. 84:. Restored version of 479:I'd like to hear what 167:Support as conominator 144:Support as conominator 128:Support as conominator 65: 36: 48:. Zwaanendael was a 540:Massimo Catarinella 524:Thank you, Mostly. 328:Conditional Support 260:History of Delaware 172:Shoemaker's Holiday 105:History of Delaware 40:-Nautical chart of 121:Johannes Vingboons 109:Zwaanendael Colony 66: 644: 620:that it would be 28:Delaware Bay 1639 930: 879: 877: 872: 796: 791: 763: 758: 730: 725: 709: 707: 694: 689: 677: 675: 642: 638: 637: 633: 582: 577: 531: 529: 499: 494: 473: 471: 448: 443: 414: 409: 369: 364: 340: 335: 317: 312: 280: 278: 273: 175: 157: 137: 135: 938: 937: 933: 932: 931: 929: 928: 927: 903: 902: 875: 868: 866: 794: 789: 761: 756: 728: 723: 705: 703: 692: 687: 673: 671: 640: 635: 631: 580: 575: 527: 525: 497: 492: 469: 467: 446: 441: 412: 407: 367: 362: 338: 333: 315: 310: 276: 269: 267: 169: 155: 133: 131: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 936: 934: 926: 925: 920: 915: 905: 904: 884: 883: 859: 843: 826: 825: 824: 823: 822: 821: 820: 819: 818: 817: 816: 815: 814: 813: 812: 811: 810: 809: 808: 807: 806: 805: 804: 803: 802: 774:Mostlyharmless 740:Mostlyharmless 700: 617: 616: 615: 614: 613: 612: 611: 610: 609: 608: 607: 606: 605: 604: 603: 512:Mostlyharmless 481:Mostlyharmless 456: 455: 454: 377: 376: 375: 353:New Netherland 325: 324: 323: 301: 291:Mostlyharmless 251: 250: 249: 248: 247: 196: 186:Mostlyharmless 179: 164: 141: 124: 123: 118: 115: 96:New Netherland 92: 89: 78:New Netherland 70: 46:New Netherland 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 935: 924: 921: 919: 916: 914: 911: 910: 908: 901: 900: 896: 892: 891:Makeemlighter 888: 882: 878: 873: 871: 863: 860: 858: 855: 854: 853: 847: 844: 842: 838: 834: 830: 827: 801: 798: 797: 792: 785: 784: 783: 779: 775: 770: 769: 768: 765: 764: 759: 751: 750: 749: 745: 741: 737: 736: 735: 732: 731: 726: 719: 714: 713: 712: 708: 701: 699: 696: 695: 690: 682: 681: 680: 676: 668: 667: 666: 662: 658: 654: 649: 648: 647: 643: 634: 627: 623: 618: 602: 598: 594: 589: 588: 587: 584: 583: 578: 571: 568: 567: 566: 563: 562: 561: 555: 551: 550: 549: 545: 541: 536: 535: 534: 530: 523: 522: 521: 517: 513: 508: 507: 506: 505: 504: 501: 500: 495: 487: 482: 478: 477: 476: 472: 465: 461: 457: 453: 450: 449: 444: 437: 436: 435: 434: 433: 429: 425: 421: 420: 419: 416: 415: 410: 403: 402: 401: 397: 393: 389: 385: 381: 378: 374: 371: 370: 365: 358: 354: 351:Removed from 350: 347: 346: 345: 342: 341: 336: 329: 326: 322: 319: 318: 313: 306: 302: 300: 296: 292: 288: 285: 284: 283: 279: 274: 272: 265: 261: 257: 256: 252: 246: 242: 238: 234: 230: 229: 228: 224: 220: 216: 215: 214: 210: 206: 205:71.59.123.169 202: 201: 197: 195: 191: 187: 183: 180: 178: 174: 173: 168: 165: 163: 160: 158: 151: 150: 145: 142: 140: 136: 129: 126: 125: 122: 119: 116: 114: 110: 106: 102: 98: 97: 93: 90: 87: 83: 79: 75: 71: 68: 67: 63: 59: 55: 51: 47: 43: 39: 35: 29: 26: 19: 886: 885: 869: 861: 851: 849: 845: 828: 787: 754: 721: 685: 652: 625: 621: 573: 569: 559: 557: 553: 490: 485: 459: 439: 405: 379: 360: 348: 331: 327: 308: 305:home article 286: 270: 264:Delaware Bay 254: 253: 237:Spikebrennan 232: 199: 198: 181: 170: 166: 152: 148: 143: 127: 101:Delaware Bay 94: 74:Delaware Bay 62:Delaware Bay 37: 27: 50:patroonship 42:Zwaanendael 907:Categories 655:image). -- 235:per nom. 833:J Milburn 570:Precisely 870:Nezzadar 622:required 552:Thats a 464:rejected 271:Nezzadar 38:Original 862:Support 846:Support 829:Comment 790:upstate 757:upstate 724:upstate 720:again? 718:WP:HERE 688:upstate 576:upstate 493:upstate 442:upstate 424:GerardM 408:upstate 392:GerardM 384:GerardM 380:Support 363:upstate 334:upstate 311:upstate 287:Comment 255:Neutral 233:Support 200:Support 182:Support 117:Creator 706:Durova 674:Durova 641:(Talk) 632:Ðiliff 528:Durova 470:Durova 134:Durova 69:Reason 852:raeky 657:jjron 626:after 560:raeky 349:Note: 219:jjron 16:< 895:talk 837:talk 795:NYer 778:talk 762:NYer 744:talk 729:NYer 693:NYer 661:talk 653:this 597:talk 593:Deor 581:NYer 554:very 544:talk 516:talk 498:NYer 486:some 447:NYer 428:talk 413:NYer 396:talk 388:talk 368:NYer 339:NYer 316:NYer 295:talk 241:talk 223:talk 209:talk 190:talk 156:Talk 460:not 909:: 897:) 889:-- 839:) 780:) 746:) 663:) 636:«» 599:) 546:) 518:) 430:) 398:) 297:) 243:) 225:) 211:) 192:) 149:NW 146:-- 130:-- 111:, 107:, 103:, 99:, 893:( 876:☎ 835:( 776:( 742:( 659:( 595:( 542:( 514:( 426:( 394:( 386:( 293:( 277:☎ 239:( 221:( 207:( 188:( 159:) 153:( 88:.

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Delaware Bay 1639

Zwaanendael
New Netherland
patroonship
Dutch West India Company
Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions
Delaware Bay
Delaware Bay
New Netherland
File:Delaware Bay Vinckeboons 14 courtesy copy.jpg
File:Delaware_Bay_Vinckeboons.jpg
New Netherland
Delaware Bay
History of Delaware
Zwaanendael Colony
Charter of Freedoms and Exemptions
Johannes Vingboons
Durova
16:11, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
NW
Talk
16:17, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Shoemaker's Holiday
17:27, 18 October 2009 (UTC)
Mostlyharmless
talk
03:19, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
71.59.123.169

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.