40:
35:
403:
335:
I think the reason we are talking about sets is because this image isn't the greatest resolution whereas each individual one is. I'm not particularly impressed by the usage of the uncut cards in the balloon article, but I am very impressed by the whole set and how they are used throughout
Knowledge
58:
Two sets of late 19th
Century collecting cards, depicting historical events in ballooning and parachuting history from 1783 to 1846. The cards show first flights, military accomplishments, triumphs and tragedies, such as the death of Tom Harris in 1824, who sacrificed his life when his balloon lost
441:
I'd support promoting all 20 images, but only tagging for the front page one or both of combined images (so I guess that would be 22 images promoted). These images are well scanned, historical illustrations. They not only illustrate ballooning, but they have art historical significance.
254:, what exactly is supporting as a set? Do we have a way to deal with that... feature picture sets? I would support as that if there is a way to deal with it... because I don't think having this many entries of the same type into FP is a good way of dealing with it.
39:
34:
325:
and
Comment: there are only two images here, Tomtheman and Grenavitar. There are 20 cards, but there are two uncut sets of 10, and so only two pieces of paper and two images. Support because they illustrative, historical, and fun to look at.
27:
384:
By having the individual cards available, the event they portray can be illustrated without 9 other distracting images. As for the "lead" image, it should be the first card (chronologically).--
271:
224:- I agree, but the individual cards won't make the size requirements... are we ok to waive that since it's a set? If there's consensus in that direction, then I'll support.
299:
The featured set template wasn't around when the
Mandelbrot set set (ha ha) was nominated. That's not to say it couldn't replace the generic template we have on it now.--
494:
356:", this is easier to see on Commons). The only reason why I had to downsample the cards is because in the 13 megabyte version it wouldn't create thumbnails. ~
267:
484:
17:
489:
92:
169:
165:
124:
108:
470:
446:
432:
420:
396:
376:
360:
343:
330:
311:
294:
282:
261:
244:
235:
214:
205:
193:
100:
120:
137:
274:
has just been promoted as the first official featured set, although by all accounts the
Mandelbrot set one was our first
353:
141:
210:
So who's gonna tag them all.. :-) ? I'm ok with it, but even featured sets need "lead pictures" that get the FP tag. ~
49:
Another find from the
Library of Congress archives in high quality, with high enc (used in 20+ articles and today's
201:
Looks good but I think it should be prmoted as a set of all the individual cards, not 2 overviews of the cards. --
465:
145:
116:
372:: It doesn't matter to me if the pictures are grouped or not--it's more applicable to the article this way.-
149:
373:
112:
104:
388:
357:
340:
303:
291:
279:
258:
241:
230:
211:
190:
84:
157:
153:
77:
349:
161:
65:
413:
393:
385:
337:
308:
300:
288:
255:
225:
133:
96:
202:
478:
461:
443:
429:
402:
88:
410:
327:
64:
For the accuracy of the depicted events, I recommend reading the article on
456:
50:
240:
They're 972 × 1422 pixels each, that's far above minimum size. ~
59:
altitude and threatened to kill Harris and his fiancée.
28:Events in early ballooning and parachuting history
53:) and high entertainment value. Proposed caption:
8:
348:There are two versions to the full cards ("
18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
495:Featured picture nominations/April 2007
453:Promoted as a set of individual images.
199:Support as a set of individual images
7:
170:Timeline of aviation - 19th century
166:Timeline of aviation - 18th century
125:Timeline of aviation - 18th century
485:Ended featured picture nominations
24:
409:either together or individually.
401:
181:Romanet & cie., c. 1890–1900
109:Aviation accidents and incidents
93:Jean-François Pilâtre de Rozier
38:
33:
101:Louis-Bernard Guyton de Morveau
121:History of military ballooning
73:Articles this image appears in
1:
138:List of early flying machines
490:Featured picture nominations
511:
471:12:22, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
447:17:32, 20 April 2007 (UTC)
433:08:30, 13 April 2007 (UTC)
421:18:31, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
397:13:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
377:11:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
361:07:45, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
344:06:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
331:05:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
312:13:32, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
295:06:29, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
283:05:30, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
262:05:01, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
245:04:48, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
236:04:27, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
215:04:56, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
206:03:38, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
194:03:28, 7 April 2007 (UTC)
142:Louis-Sébastien Lenormand
117:Battle of Fleurus (1794)
150:Joseph Louis Gay-Lussac
382:Support cut up version
146:André-Jacques Garnerin
61:
113:Surveillance aircraft
105:Jean-Pierre Blanchard
56:
187:Support as nominator
85:Montgolfier brothers
83:1st Series – 1,2,4:
268:thread on talk page
158:First French Empire
354:highest resolution
154:Jean-Baptiste Biot
78:Balloon (aircraft)
469:
173:
128:
502:
459:
405:
162:Sophie Blanchard
132:2nd Series – 1:
131:
82:
66:Sophie Blanchard
42:
37:
510:
509:
505:
504:
503:
501:
500:
499:
475:
474:
358:trialsanderrors
280:trialsanderrors
242:trialsanderrors
233:
212:trialsanderrors
191:trialsanderrors
134:Battle of Mainz
97:Jacques Charles
51:"Did you know?"
31:
22:
21:
20:
12:
11:
5:
508:
506:
498:
497:
492:
487:
477:
476:
450:
449:
436:
428:- see above --
423:
399:
379:
367:
366:
365:
364:
363:
320:
319:
318:
317:
316:
315:
314:
249:
248:
247:
231:
219:
218:
217:
196:
183:
182:
179:
175:
174:
129:
123:; 2,4,5,7,10:
80:
74:
70:
69:
62:
54:
47:
30:
25:
23:
15:
14:
13:
10:
9:
6:
4:
3:
2:
507:
496:
493:
491:
488:
486:
483:
482:
480:
473:
472:
467:
463:
458:
454:
448:
445:
440:
437:
434:
431:
427:
424:
422:
419:
418:
417:
412:
408:
404:
400:
398:
395:
392:
391:
387:
383:
380:
378:
375:
374:129.170.50.27
371:
368:
362:
359:
355:
351:
347:
346:
345:
342:
339:
334:
333:
332:
329:
324:
321:
313:
310:
307:
306:
302:
298:
297:
296:
293:
290:
286:
285:
284:
281:
277:
273:
272:Bezier curves
269:
265:
264:
263:
260:
257:
253:
250:
246:
243:
239:
238:
237:
234:
229:
228:
223:
220:
216:
213:
209:
208:
207:
204:
200:
197:
195:
192:
188:
185:
184:
180:
177:
176:
171:
167:
163:
159:
155:
151:
147:
143:
139:
135:
130:
126:
122:
118:
114:
110:
106:
102:
98:
94:
90:
86:
81:
79:
75:
72:
71:
67:
63:
60:
55:
52:
48:
45:
44:
43:
41:
36:
29:
26:
19:
452:
451:
438:
425:
415:
414:
406:
389:
381:
369:
322:
304:
287:Ah, thanks.
275:
251:
226:
221:
198:
186:
168:; 5,8,9,10:
57:
32:
89:Gas balloon
76:Both sets:
479:Categories
203:antilived
466:contribs
444:Andrew c
276:de facto
439:Support
435:penubag
430:Penubag
426:Support
407:Support
370:Support
352:" and "
336:(XXG).
323:Support
278:set. ~
252:Comment
222:Comment
178:Creator
164:; 2,4:
91:; 4,8:
416:/talk/
350:higher
115:; 10:
46:Reason
411:—dima
394:oHelp
328:Enuja
309:oHelp
227:tiZom
160:; 7:
156:; 6:
148:; 5:
144:; 4:
140:; 3:
136:; 2:
111:; 9:
107:; 8:
103:; 7:
99:; 6:
95:; 5:
87:; 3:
16:<
462:talk
386:Here
338:gren
301:Here
289:gren
266:See
256:gren
232:(2¢)
457:KFP
341:グレン
292:グレン
259:グレン
481::
464:|
455:--
270:.
189:—
152:,
119:,
468:)
460:(
442:-
390:T
305:T
172:.
127:.
68:.
Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.
