Knowledge (XXG)

:Featured picture candidates/Komodo dragon - Knowledge (XXG)

Source πŸ“

322: 51: 356:
Having taken both photos, I can explain further. The full length picture is good for the header photo as it illustrates the whole animal. But it cannot do justice to this most fearsome of reptiles. For that you need the nominated image. Think about human portraits. Do we reject all of them? Think
181:
Naturally the harsh shadows are intentional to show menace with the extended tongue. I took other photos of the whole animal and of males fighting, but I chose this one to feature. The animal is so large, if you show it all you don't get the menace, nor the detail of head, tongue and front leg.
318:
I can clarify. The main function of a photo on wikipedia should be encyclopedic: does it accurately portray the animal? In this case, having more than half the animal out of frame, and the half that is in frame obscured by shadow does not fit this description. It certainly is articistic, and
225: 146:- I'm sorry to vote against this one, but the combination of harsh shadows, and the fact that most of the animal has been cut off (the image looks like the animal is very wide, but in reality is quite long) means low EV. 200:
Oh yeah, I get the menace. My issue is that this choice, though very appropriate for a more aesthetics-oriented site like Commons (not to mention hard to avoid this close to the equator), limits the image's EV in the
380:
I took the liberty to replace the old version with a gamma-corrected one, please see if this might fare better... If you don't like it, feel free to revert it on the file page! --
341:
But it shows its forked tongue very clearly, the role of which is discussed in the article; and it's the only picture in the article showing its tongue. So there's EV. β€”
504: 99: 494: 163:- Very striking and aesthetically pleasing picture of a komodo dragon. I'm not keen on the shadows for EV purposes, however. They seem almost black Β β€” 298:– The dramatic, constrasty sidelighting makes for a striking image and doesn't detract at all from the EV. Genuinely not sure what the problem is. – 17: 499: 134:– Impressive with good EV; I'm not too fond of the black shadow (a little too harsh), but it doesn't detract from the picture quality. β€” 460: 455: 480: 467: 444: 427: 406: 388: 366: 345: 336: 309: 290: 273: 254: 237: 210: 191: 172: 155: 138: 126: 402: 362: 187: 122: 321: 440: 307: 233: 206: 168: 50: 87: 423: 418:. This is a great photo of the Komodo dragon because it is a close-up and is very crisp and clear. 332: 319:"menacing", however it's not encyclopedic. For example, would you know that it is shaped like this 151: 398: 358: 183: 118: 107: 436: 300: 250: 229: 202: 164: 385: 286: 270: 62: 419: 328: 147: 69:. A reptile's forked tongue allows it to sense from which direction a smell is coming. 488: 477: 342: 135: 83: 357:
about education. Which image would you use to talk to children about this creature?
246: 381: 282: 266: 91: 66: 320: 49: 245:
I think shadow isnt good option here, to strong contrast. --
77:
Through to second round of Commons Picture of the Year 2017
435:- I think the shadow is a bit too strong on its right. 35:
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.
397:
Thanks for the effort, but I prefer the dark shadows.
100:Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles 8: 18:Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates 505:Featured picture nominations/April 2017 7: 80:Articles in which this image appears 495:Ended featured picture nominations 24: 454: 1: 500:Featured picture nominations 521: 481:12:46, 29 April 2017 (UTC) 468:06:52, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 445:05:33, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 428:01:12, 28 April 2017 (UTC) 407:09:08, 27 April 2017 (UTC) 389:14:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 367:09:47, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 346:06:25, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 337:01:09, 26 April 2017 (UTC) 310:17:11, 24 April 2017 (UTC) 291:14:50, 21 April 2017 (UTC) 274:20:14, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 255:08:31, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 238:04:35, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 211:01:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC) 192:06:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 173:01:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC) 156:23:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 139:12:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 127:09:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC) 96:FP category for this image 226:the Commons FP discussion 325: 70: 57:– Male komodo dragon ( 39:Voting period ends on 327:based on this image? 324: 53: 281:per other opposes.-- 115:Support as nominator 88:Komodo National Park 224:per my comments at 59:Varanus komodoensis 466: 326: 264: 263:per other opposes. 71: 28:Male Komodo dragon 453: 259: 47: 512: 465: 463: 303: 38: 36: 520: 519: 515: 514: 513: 511: 510: 509: 485: 484: 461: 301: 37: 34: 31: 22: 21: 20: 12: 11: 5: 518: 516: 508: 507: 502: 497: 487: 486: 474:Not Promoted 471: 470: 447: 430: 412: 411: 410: 409: 392: 391: 374: 373: 372: 371: 370: 369: 351: 350: 349: 348: 313: 312: 293: 276: 257: 240: 222:Strong support 218: 217: 216: 215: 214: 213: 203:Chris Woodrich 195: 194: 176: 175: 165:Chris Woodrich 158: 141: 129: 111: 110: 105: 102: 97: 94: 81: 78: 75: 45:09:37:05 (UTC) 33: 30: 25: 23: 15: 14: 13: 10: 9: 6: 4: 3: 2: 517: 506: 503: 501: 498: 496: 493: 492: 490: 483: 482: 479: 475: 469: 464: 459: 458: 451: 448: 446: 442: 438: 437:Γ‰tienne Dolet 434: 431: 429: 425: 421: 417: 414: 413: 408: 404: 400: 399:Charlesjsharp 396: 395: 394: 393: 390: 387: 383: 379: 376: 375: 368: 364: 360: 359:Charlesjsharp 355: 354: 353: 352: 347: 344: 340: 339: 338: 334: 330: 323: 317: 316: 315: 314: 311: 308: 305: 304: 297: 294: 292: 288: 284: 280: 277: 275: 272: 268: 262: 258: 256: 252: 248: 244: 241: 239: 235: 231: 227: 223: 220: 219: 212: 208: 204: 199: 198: 197: 196: 193: 189: 185: 184:Charlesjsharp 180: 179: 178: 177: 174: 170: 166: 162: 159: 157: 153: 149: 145: 142: 140: 137: 133: 130: 128: 124: 120: 116: 113: 112: 109: 108:Charlesjsharp 106: 103: 101: 98: 95: 93: 89: 85: 84:Komodo dragon 82: 79: 76: 73: 72: 68: 64: 60: 56: 52: 48: 46: 42: 29: 26: 19: 473: 472: 456: 449: 432: 415: 377: 302:Juliancolton 299: 295: 278: 260: 242: 221: 160: 143: 131: 114: 58: 54: 44: 41:29 Apr 2017 40: 32: 27: 230:Daniel Case 201:article.Β β€” 161:Weak oppose 489:Categories 462:Spider-Man 457:Marvellous 420:Bmbaker88 329:Mattximus 148:Mattximus 92:Indonesia 67:Indonesia 478:Armbrust 343:Bruce1ee 136:Bruce1ee 65:Island, 55:Original 416:Support 378:Comment 296:Support 132:Support 119:Charles 104:Creator 450:Oppose 433:Oppose 279:Oppose 261:Oppose 243:Oppose 144:Oppose 74:Reason 63:Komodo 382:Janke 283:Jobas 267:Janke 61:) on 16:< 452:- -- 441:talk 424:talk 403:talk 386:Talk 363:talk 333:talk 287:talk 271:Talk 251:talk 247:Mile 234:talk 207:talk 188:talk 169:talk 152:talk 123:talk 43:at 491:: 476:-- 443:) 426:) 405:) 384:| 365:) 335:) 306:| 289:) 269:| 265:-- 253:) 236:) 228:. 209:) 190:) 171:) 154:) 125:) 117:– 90:, 86:, 439:( 422:( 401:( 361:( 331:( 285:( 249:( 232:( 205:( 186:( 167:( 150:( 121:(

Index

Knowledge (XXG):Featured picture candidates
Male Komodo dragon

Komodo
Indonesia
Komodo dragon
Komodo National Park
Indonesia
Knowledge (XXG):Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles
Charlesjsharp
Charles
talk
09:37, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Bruce1ee
12:15, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Mattximus
talk
23:00, 19 April 2017 (UTC)
Chris Woodrich
talk
01:01, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Charlesjsharp
talk
06:59, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
Chris Woodrich
talk
01:41, 22 April 2017 (UTC)
the Commons FP discussion
Daniel Case
talk

Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License. Additional terms may apply.

↑